Faith

‘Gendercide’: Anti-Abortion Group Releases Undercover Expose Purportedly Showing Planned Parenthood‘s Complicity in ’Sex-Selection Abortion’

Live Action Releases Sex Selection Abortion Planned Parenthood EsposeLive Action, a pro-life group based in San Jose, California, went undercover to discover a troubling trend that is occurring across the globe — sex-selection abortion (the process of purposefully terminating a pregnancy based solely on the child’s gender). While this phenomenon is known to be occurring in China, among other nations, the organization claims that it’s also happening here in the United States of America.

In part one of a new video series entitled “Gendercide: Sex Selection in America,” the group, which also launched ProtectOurGirls.com to accompany the sting operation, visits an Austin, Texas, Planned Parenthood for an undercover investigation. The findings may disturb you.

“This was a multi-state, national investigation demonstrating that this is a widespread problem across our country,” Live Action president Lila Rose said in an interview with The Daily Caller on Monday. “First of all, the statistics and studies indicate that we are adding to the growing problem across the world of sex-selective targeting of unborn girls for abortion. We are going to be demonstrating — starting with this video from Texas — that the abortion industry in the United States is aiding and abetting this horrific problem.”

It was in April 2012 that Rose’s group investigated these abortion clinics to see what would happen if employees were asked about aborting based on gender. In part one, which was released this week, a Planned Parenthood employee named “Rebecca” can be seen speaking with the undercover woman, who makes it clear that she only wants to abort her child if, indeed, it is a female.

Live Action Releases Sex Selection Abortion Planned Parenthood Espose

"Rebecca," a counselor at a Planned Parenthood in Austin, Texas

“In this video, what is astounding is that Rebecca, the Planned Parenthood counselor, starts arranging with the actor about how to get a late-term abortion,” Rose continued in her interview with the Daily Caller. “To wait until her pregnancy is so developed that — and using Medicaid for this, using the state to pay for the ultrasound to determine the gender, and then to do a late term abortion if it was a little girl.”

As Rose notes, the employee seems completely unfazed by the woman’s gender-based plans and proceeds to discuss the legalities of abortion, specifically the time-frame during which the baby’s sex is detectable and how much time the woman has to go through with the procedure.

Live Action Releases Sex Selection Abortion Planned Parenthood Espose

The conversation between Rebecca and the actress also turns to Medicaid, which the employee claims can be used to help the potential patient determine the sex of her baby so that she can later abort if it is a female. This, of course, would purportedly be done covertly (i.e. without telling doctors of the intent to abort) so that the sonograms can be covered by government insurance before letting doctors know of the intention to abort.

“I have actually applied for Medicaid — got on Medicaid — as if I was going to continue my pregnancy. Went through the OB/GYN and then me and my husband decided that we were going to go ahead and terminate,” Rebecca explained, recounting her own experience. “We terminated, and I still stayed on Medicaid and just got on birth control. Right after I got on birth control, I just stopped using it.”

Then, the faux patient asked, “So, um, so then I could, um, then we could probably, you’re thinking, if we did that, we could probably get pregnant again soon after?”

Rebecca answered affirmatively and said that she has had four children and two abortions and that getting pregnant again soon after is absolutely permissible.

Watch the disturbing clip, below:

(H/T: HotAir.com)

Comments (140)

1 2 3
  • VTPatriot44
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:42pm

    I don’t want to believe there are really people in this country who are that deplorable, but I guess I’m being naive. Just sad that this will likely go no further than the Blaze.

    Report Post »  
    • lantzh
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:00pm

      yes, its that kind of “ blindness”that has gotten us to the point of near revolution.

      There are many like this, and they dont care about anything but their money and power.

      Report Post »  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:36pm

      Don’t feel bad. Human beings tend to “project” on to others. That’s why people like you and I generally assume most people are “good”, and generally want to do the right thing.

      It’s also why Progressives generally assume most people are stupid, lazy, racist and looking for the easy path, because that’s how those Progressives go through life.

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • Marci
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:47pm

      And yet, the left will still defend PP to the bitter end, knowing FULL well what they do. They defend it not because they believe otherwise, they defend it and scream you down to silence you so they don’t have to have the argument. And of the most deplorable things, calling abortion “women’s health” is ranking right up there.

      Report Post » Marci  
    • ozchambers
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:44pm

      This is so nauseating to see. I suspect that when God’s wrath descends, these clinics of death will burn a bit hotter.

      Report Post » ozchambers  
    • Alessandre
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 7:18pm

      @Lantzh – this report originated w/ Live Action, is on Hot Air, was picked up from there by 16 sites thus far, including the Blaze, I posted it on my FB page, others here have probably posted it too, you may post it – this can go far beyond the Blaze if we each continue exposing it. The Blaze won’t be as far as it goes. Rather than believing there’s no hope, we can choose to act & then we see there is hope because others are acting too.

      Report Post »  
  • Chet Hempstead
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:41pm

    This is all good. In terms of curbing population growth, the number of women is the number that really matters (3 men + 2 women = 2 babies; 2 men + 3 women = 3 babies). And anyway, Planned Parenthood isn’t telling anyone to abort girls, they’re just minding their own business and providing these women with a service that is equally their right to seek whether they have a good reason for wanting it or a bad.

    Report Post »  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 1:25pm

      Like virtually all “modern liberal thinking” your premise is false, hypocritical and leads you to a conclusion based in moral relativism.

      The false..
      Population is a problem,,, Population growth is levelling and not a problem. It is a false flag to subvert the West.. If it were a problem who decides who shall live and who shall not…

      The hypocrisy..
      Immigration is necessary to have workers… Yet, population growth is a problem…

      The ignorant..
      Planned parenthood came from the Progressives and the Eugenics movement.. While informing women of their reproductive rights is a good thing. In pragmatic application, Planned Parenthood is using taxpayer funds to promote Eugenics, like all “social” programs they need to justify their existence for funding and that is only achieved with a pro abortion bias, they just aren’t neutral. If they were, they would fade away.

      The reality..
      The problem with the “modern liberal mind” is context. They just can’t separate the idealism from the pragmatic.

      Socialism/Progressivism sounds wonderfully utopian in theory. but the only pragmatic socialist/progressive is one that runs out of other peoples money.

      Modern Liberalism is an ideology of dreams, change, illusions, future, stories, from lies deceit and manipulation and as it progresses, increasingly enslaves the individual psychologically, economically and physically.

      http://vimeo.com/18090616

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • Hunrodr
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 1:34pm

      are you an idiot or just another slobbering dog of the left. abortion is not an altenative to over-population. determinting who gets aborted according to sex is immoral. you CANT really believe what you just typed.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 1:43pm

      Immigration slows down population growth because it separates families for years at a time. Even if they weren’t here they would still exist, and we all live on the same planet in the long run.

      How the hell is Planned Parenthood of today promoting eugenics? They don’t recruit from one group or another and encourage them to not reproduce. They just make their services available to anyone who wants them and mind their own business. Unless you mean that all people who get pregnant when they don’t want to are stupid and so are their partners, but stupid people self-selecting to not reproduce is the one kind of eugenics I find it really hard to have a problem with.

      Report Post »  
    • notsodeepthoughts
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:27pm

      Re: Chet Hempstead: “How the hell is Planned Parenthood of today promoting eugenics?”

      Would you please do some research on the founder of Planned Parenthood??? Margret Sanger was an active proponent of eugenics (”against black, yelllow and unfit persons”) and it was written into the original charter of the American Birth Control League, before it was changed to Planned Parenthood. So you ask; that was then, this is now and they (Planned Parenthood) have changed for the better right? Would you prefer if they were now an “Equal Opportunity Abotion Advocate”?

      I suspect I could never convince you that Planned Parenthood was a vile organization, but please do some research before you fall in line with their supporters next time.

      Report Post » notsodeepthoughts  
    • tzion
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:29pm

      So your solution to a potential future problem should society continue to advance and progress is stagnation? Just maintain the status quot for the rest of time? Everyone’s life would be predetermined because further advances are unsustainable?

      Why don‘t we do what we’ve always done throughout history? We actually fix the problem and bring about a new era of prosperity. Or maybe you‘d like to see our entire health care industry die in flames so that overpopulation won’t be a problem?

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:29pm

      Hunrodr
      If determining who gets aborted according to sex is immoral, then the result of that abortion is that there will be one less child in the world raised by an immoral parent. People’s intentions are their own business. In terms of results doing the right thing – minding your own business and letting other people exercise their rights, yields the best outcome.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:34pm

      notsodeepthoughts
      So what? Margaret Sanger is dead. Lots of people were racist back then – sociologists, anthropologists, Ford Motors. I asked, “How the hell is Planned Parenthood of TODAY promoting eugenics?” You told me a bunch of crap I already knew and never answered the question.

       
    • Jaycen
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:40pm

      Chet’s another Malthusian Progressive. “The world is on the brink of over-population.”

      People have been saying that since before the 1800′s. Well? If we were on the brink back then, and 200 years later the population is immensely larger, where’s the crisis? Where are the cannibals?

      Where are the millions of starving people – aside from those in 3rd world hell holes who are starving, because of their tyrrants, and not their lack of land and farming aid?

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:57pm

      @CHET

      CHET, CHEET, CHEEET, think, the argument form the left is that the US needs increased immigration for workers and “national” population growth at the same time they promote the false crisis of too many people. The population crisis is a scam by the left, socialists who want to engage in social engineering.

      As said above, look up Progressivism “aka modern liberalism aka Socialism” Margaret Sanger and Eugenics. Eugenics is social engineering and comes from the socialist elitist left.

      If you can understand this concept you might figure out that true Conservative values empower the individual not the State. Socialism seeks to transform and socially engineer based on the diktat of elitists. All socialism will ultimately progress toward increased coercion of the state to transform society into what can be described as Social Darwinism. Man will shape man. It sounds like a better world but it is not.

      Eugenics can be based on religion, race or class…

      Elitist and Fabian Socialist George Bernard Shaw the hero to Progressives and “modern liberalism”
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgpaKkrZex4

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:04pm

      tzion
      I am for progress and advancement.

      Jaycen
      The world isn’t on the brink of overpopulation, it is overpopulated. Population growth is the root cause of environmental problems. I do not believe the view that the greedy class tries to instill in the masses – that if we’re not all dead already, there must not be any such thing as environmental problems, so we can all do whatever the hell we want forever.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:08pm

      If “true Conservative values empower the individual not the State,” then I’m a Conservative, because I want to empower the individual to be able to get an abortion for any stupid damn reason she wants, without having to explain her reasons to anyone, and disempower the state to interfere with her rights.

      Report Post »  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:09pm

      @CHET
      How the hell is Planned Parenthood of TODAY promoting eugenics?

      ——————————————————————————-

      “More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
      Margaret Sanger

      Because it is promoting abortion for those who are in the lower classes. Eugenics by class…

      Planned Parenthood profits from legitimization of abortion for the lower class in society, more specifically called NEGATIVE EUGENICS..

      They advocate and promote abortion…. perhaps the term Eugenics is stumping you. It is not necessarily forced, can be by persuation.

      Publicly Planned Parenthood presents itself a an advocate for Women’s health but pragmatically they promote abortion to the “lower class” NEGATIVE EUGENICS

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:25pm

      @CHET

      You are a Conservative but just don’t realize it,,,, you have been lied to, population is NOT a problem… this is Elitist propaganda..

      You must acknowledge the unalienable rights of the individual yet to be born.. not aborted…

      This is a moral question, who decides or influences life and death of others?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RAAhTL4Arg

      As I said, informing women is good, but Planned Parenthood has a bias and an agenda… this posted vid and their history show that.

      Informing is one thing, promoting is another…

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:51pm

      Sue Dohnim
      Poor people traditionally reproduce at a higher rate than rich people anyway. Giving them a choice about it even after they screw up is just helping poor people to not make themselves even poorer, I don’t see that as a tragic crime against humanity. Like I said, Margaret Sanger doesn’t run Planned Parenthood any more. I don’t care if they were founded by Dr. Moreau and originally dedicated to surgically turning dogs into humans; that’s got nothing to do with a woman in a medical center today minding her own business and respecting a patient’s right to make choices about her own care.

      Sorry, until you stop relying on somebody else’s bloodstream to feed you, you’re not an individual with rights of your own.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:54pm

      Sue Dohnim
      Virginia Ironside doesn’t run Planned Parenthood either, and they don’t smother sick children.

      Report Post »  
    • FFTyranny
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:26pm

      Chet Hempstead, oh I would so much love to have your address. I am so sicken by your comments and your Satanic morals that I think it would be worth it to spend time behind bars, you sick bastard.

      Report Post » FFTyranny  
    • isur5ed
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 6:52pm

      @Chet
      You said “Sorry, until you stop relying on somebody else’s bloodstream to feed you, you’re not an individual with rights of your own.”
      Did you know that when carrying multiples – doctors want the babies to stay in utero for at minimum 23 weeks. After that they can help them pretty well in NICU. But in NICU they are dependent upon feeding tubes and oxygen. This is the point when abortions are still being performed. Inside the uterus it is acceptable, outside it is a crime. Doesn’t make sense. You’re deceiving yourself. Just because a baby is dependent upon its mother‘s bloodstream shouldn’t preclude it from individuality. You sound like one who would just as likely pull a feeding tube from the baby in NICU or from your grandma in the nursing home. After all, it‘s your money that’s keeping her in there and she is essentially relying on your bloodstream . . . therefore she’s no longer an individual with any rights (according to you) . . . Maybe you don’t take it to that extreme . . . but where do you draw the line. Once the cord is cut?

      Report Post » isur5ed  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 7:32pm

      @CHET

      You don’t seem to understand the difference between valid reproductive education and the Gov (taxpayer funded) activities of Planned Parenthood.

      It is the context. They are not unbiased, they promote abortion, that is their purpose, their ideology, their history, their financial incentive, their structure, their personnel. You need to separate the idealistic from the pragmatic..

      This is how people get fooled by “Modern Liberalism”, look beyond the propaganda.

      Ironside is a “modern Liberal” Fabian Socialist who admits her intentions freely. This is the ideology that permeates Planned Parenthood. They just won’t say it openly.

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 7:54pm

      isur5ed
      But where do you draw the line. Once the cord is cut?
      Yeah, that’s it exactly before that you don’t have free will and you aren’t perceiving the world through your senses and beginning to form a human mind. Then we need to do what we can to keep you alive. At the earliest, I would consider that it is preferable not to abort a fetus at after the point when it becomes truly viable – meaning it could stay alive by drinking milk and breathing air without any of this NICU crap. We’re talking about people not opossums, so they aren’t supposed to be born until all you have to do for them is feed them and keep them warm.

      As for Grandma in her nursing home, if she can’t say “Hey, don’t do that,” then she ain’t your Grandma any more. Back when she still was, she had plenty of time to make up her mind about what she wanted to happen when things got to this point, and that’s what we should go by. If she didn’t make up her mind when she had the chance, and I’m really footing the bill for this vegetable garden, then hopefully I have some old letters and other handwriting samples that will enable me to suddenly discover that she “did” make clear her intent.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 8:03pm

      Sue Dohnim
      I don’t know if they’re really promoting abortion just because you keep saying they are, but even if they were, as long as public funds don’t go directly to doing it, then that would still make them no better or worse than any of the numerous faith-based organizations who take public money for providing social or medical services while using private funds to produce anti-abortion propaganda,

      Report Post »  
    • Furretpdx
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 11:00pm

      The only thing REALLY wrong with what they are doing is using tax money. I agree that tax payers should have a choice where money goes for serious moral issues. If you believe abortion is wrong you shouldnt have to pay for it, but you have no right to tell someone they have to follow your morals. Want to fix the problem? Draw the line at when a fetus can 100% live outside of the mother’s body WITHOUT HUMAN interference. A true Christian can not say they are leaving it in gods hands if they are keeping someone alive artificially.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 30, 2012 at 2:32am

      Tax payers aren’t paying for abortions. Personally, I think we should pay for them, because anyone who can’t afford an abortion sure as hell can’t afford a baby, and we’ll end up paying a lot more if they have it.

      Report Post »  
    • bigspike
      Posted on May 30, 2012 at 5:47am

      anyone who would publicly approve of ‘gender selection abortion’ is a moral midget; anyone who would publicly approve of using tax money for this purpose is a Nazi

      Report Post » bigspike  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 30, 2012 at 2:04pm

      I don’t actually think gender selection abortion is okay morally, I’m just saying that it yields a good result. I think a lot of us have an unrealistically exaggerated view of how much people’s good and bad intentions affect the results of their actions. I’m for using tax money abortions, I couldn’t care less why anyone is getting one.

      Report Post »  
  • Psychosis
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:37pm

    helloooooo

    where all the trollies go??????

    i find it amusing how they avoid commenting on some articles

    Report Post » Psychosis  
  • Depressed_American
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:36pm

    I honestly don’t understand how anyone can be a liberal (Democrat) in this country. I don’t mean to sound like I am picking on the Democrats, I am not. I totally don’t understand the mindset of the Liberals. Where is the responsibility for your actions, your sense of right and wrong; your conscience . This is wrong and very digusting!!! And Don’t give me that “Pro-Choice” crap……..

    Live and let live, and take no responsibility??? Civilized societies don’t function or survive with this mindset!!!! America is doomed if we don’t re-find our Morals!!!

    Report Post » Depressed_American  
    • JimL
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:49pm

      That’s the plan.

      Report Post »  
    • Therightsofbilly
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:55pm

      Where, you ask?

      They have none.

      None whatsoever.

      No sense of right and wrong.

      No conscience.

      None.

      Report Post » Therightsofbilly  
    • JimL
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 1:53pm

      So Right Billy.

      Report Post »  
    • ICEDRAGONNITE
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:29pm

      I say if abortion is allowed start with those that commit abortion. I cannot wrap my mind around killing my children. May these people burn.

      Report Post » ICEDRAGONNITE  
    • trtmntdude
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:28pm

      We are indeed doomed. There has been a steady decline in our moral fabric since the founding. When your starting point is freedom and a conservative mind, the only way to go with “compromise” is to the left. And the right is the only side expected to compromise. Our problem is not with the liberals. Our problem is with the conservatives who say they represent our interesst but only represent the interests of themselves and their career.

      Report Post »  
    • Depressed_American
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:31pm

      trtmntdude

      I am a conservative. I am not rich, nor do I have the desire to be rich. I am content with what I have in life. I don’t want my neighbors things, nor do I want my government to take my neighbors things, to redistribute to others. I know what is right and what is wrong. I try to teach my children what is right and what is wrong. I ALSO try to teach them responsibility and that there are consequences to the choices that they make. Blaming others for YOUR mistakes is not how you go through life. It is called taking responsibility for YOUR actions.

      If you deside to have sex, then the consequence is a possible pregnancy. Killing the innocent baby in the womb is NOT the responsible thing to do. You findout you are going to have a baby girl, Killing that innocent is NOT the responsible thing to do. It is reprehensible……. Life is the gift from God, and we should cherish it always…….

      Report Post » Depressed_American  
    • Thatsenough
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:16pm

      The less control people can exercize internally, the more the State steps in to regulate it. St Augustine was right about being enslaved to our vices (sin.). I believe that’s what the progressive elites want, so they can control every aspect from the cradle to the grave…because only the properly educated can be trusted to regulate their own behavior.

      Report Post »  
    • bigspike
      Posted on May 30, 2012 at 5:49am

      right and wrong, responsibility for your actions, conscience…those are all alien concepts to Liberals

      Report Post » bigspike  
  • The-Monk
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:36pm

    Sounds like China….

    Report Post » The-Monk  
    • Bluebonnet
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:01pm

      Just what I thought too. Give the people free stuff and they take advantage of it.

      Report Post »  
    • Furretpdx
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 11:02pm

      No, china forced women to abort female fetuses… This woman was choosing to abort her female fetus.

      Report Post »  
  • Poliyuck96
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:34pm

    Disgusting

    Report Post »  
  • Noah Noel
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:27pm

    No, Rebecca had six children. She chose to kill two of them with our help (meaning our tax dollars).

    Report Post »  
    • Bluebonnet
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 2:08pm

      Not only do they do late term abortions, Obama voted in favor of it. Can you imagine putting scissors through the brain of a baby when only the head shows, and killing it before the rest of body is born?
      If the baby lives through the drugs to abort it, this is what they do, and if it live through that, they are thrown into a closet until they die on their own. A nurse told this story, she at least rocked it until it died after she found it in a closet. Then she quit her job at the hospital who allowed this kind of murder against babies.

      Report Post »  
  • inblack
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:24pm

    Why is this surprising?

    Planned parenthood is pro-abortion for ANY reason. They do not care.

    If it is your choice, you can kill your baby at 9 months for any reason.

    In fact if they passed a law that said you can kill your children up to the age of 20 years old, planned parenthood would gladly kill your girls for you.

    I expect they will spin off a Planned Exit business where you can bring mommy and daddy and have them killed off.

    The culture of death has no conscience.

    Report Post »  
    • Ghandi was a Republican
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:35pm

      Correction. Not choice. As a profit motivated organization PP will use fear tactics and pressure/urgency steering. They could also be called pregnancy farms because of their unwillingness to teach simple abstinence a few days a Month. They will provide (at taxpayer cost) a battery of precaution material. One of PPs tactics is to exploit insecurity of ‘a fetus’ as it regards to a woman/child’s relationship prospects. They will be encouraged to leave the man out of the process. THIS is murder. THIS is homicide with malice. No taxpayer should be forced too contribute to these heretics.
      IF ( a big IF) PP were a conscionable entity it might be a little different. They are not. they are a progressive hi-jacked entity exploiting an agenda.

      Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • Free2speakRN
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:44pm

      Hey, you forgot. If they ‘breach’ the coming birth, leave the head inside the ‘mother’, and only then…scramble the ‘thing’s’ brain,….It ain’t a baby! …I didn’t see no head!? D’you?

      I thought everybody knew that. It’s progressive. What’s wrong with progress?

      Report Post »  
  • Ghandi was a Republican
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:24pm

    This is what minorities have to look forward to if they keep voting for this sloth. Not because the white man will do it. It will happen because the State will naturally go with whatever serves the State best. That will no longer be the dependency class. A productive collective is a happy collective. “Serve the State” All hail the collective. Women will be regulated according to population and productivity control. This is not theory. This is the sort of ‘progress’ the progs have envisioned since day 1. Groupthink, political allegiance to ‘the man’. Regulating humankind…. First out- blacks, Jews, cripples and feebs. Sick and twisted to the core.

    Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:32pm

      Your right! Its the State not the White man who is incharge! The White man is long dead in the USA for having any power or control. If he did, he would not tolerate this!

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
  • girlnurse
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:22pm

    We have no business talking about ANY other country and acting like we are better than ANY of them!
    We are blatant murderers in this country!

    Report Post » girlnurse  
  • DamocleAurelius
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:21pm

    And we are funding these monsters WHY!?

    Report Post »  
  • rebelwuf
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:21pm

    It is the left that is TRULY waging a war against women.

    Report Post »  
  • Noah Noel
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:20pm

    Should we expect less from these cold-hearted murderers!
    “If we ever forget we are one nation under God, then we are one nation gone under” Ronald Reagan
    Since our country’s laws currently support killing babies in the womb, I would say we are well underway gone!

    Report Post »  
  • HKS
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:18pm

    Could it be? this is the real war on women by the liberals, extra, extra read all about it, Obama declares war on girl babies.

    Report Post » HKS  
  • biohazard23
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:14pm

    Disgusting. These women facilitating this kind of garbage should be grateful that their own mothers didn’t choose to murder them before they were born due of the “inconvenience” of having a baby girl. THIS is the REAL war on women, but liberals will still violently cling to abortion as a perverse badge of honor of some sort…..

    Report Post » biohazard23  
    • oldguy49
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:21pm

      love to see the positive influence my tax dollars have

      Report Post »  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:30pm

      The most dangerous place to be in America is inside the womb of a female liberal. Now they decide how they can do population control through birth selection. Limit the available female wombs in the country by only allowing males to be born and thus reduce the population. Man was not meant to be without his God made companion. Thousands of Chinese men have no mates because there just are not enough women to go around. Just think about that real hard. The social engineers have made men worthless in society. The state provides for females who are single parents and many by design. Women are now the dominant species in our society. They call all the shots.

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:34pm

      You don’t see the tragic and ironic twist? They were subjugated by men and now they subjugate themselves all in the name of womens rights. You can’t make this stuff up!

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:50pm

      @ChiefGeorge, at this point, the liberal mantra probably goes a little something like this:

      “Woman, thy name is Julia.”

      Report Post » biohazard23  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:43pm

      More like….Woman thy name is godess!

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
  • Yorzaxt
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:13pm

    Hardly surprising considering Margaret Sanger was a Eugenics advocate that founded Planned parenthood to rid the world of people she deemed undesirable. Its just liberals going back to their roots. I have a little 6 year old myself and if anyone tried to harm her I would kill them.

    Report Post »  
    • JimL
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:38pm

      Joy Gene and new determinates to terminate.

      Report Post »  
  • Temporal
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:13pm

    Why are we so shocked? When abortion on demand becomes a “constitutional right” equal to freedom of speech, then we must accept abortion on demand in all its forms.

    “On demand” means it’s OK to kill your baby because it might interfere with your vacation plans, might be gay, or might have red hair!

    Then, since we’re being taught “rights” can conferred by the government, the government will determine when we must exercise them.

    Baby born with a disease? Kill it. Baby born to an impoverished family? Kill it. Baby might contribute to global warming? Kill it!

    Report Post »  
    • Kitkarr
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:19pm

      They’ll use any convenient reason whatsoever to justify killing a child, but throw a living fit if a terrorist is brought to justice…or a mass murderer is given the death penalty…or a polar bear is moved 10 feet from his home. Priority management is the problem, stemming from a lack of true love.

      Report Post » Kitkarr  
  • AvengerK
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:13pm

    And the lefties keep scratching their heads and ask..”what could go wrong?”.

    Report Post »  
  • Yorzaxt
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:12pm

    Hardly surprising given that Margaret Sanger, the founder of planned parenthood and hero to the left, was a Eugenics advocate that founded planned parenthood to attempt to rid the world of people she personally deemed undesirable.

    Report Post »  
  • venrooy
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:07pm

    Wow… a legitimate war on women – and I’ll bet not a single network will pick it up.

    Report Post »  
  • FeliciaJewel
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:06pm

    Feeling sick to my stomach. :(

    Report Post » FeliciaJewel  
  • Kitkarr
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:06pm

    Shouldn’t the lefty “women’s rights” groups be up in arms about this?

    Report Post » Kitkarr  
  • EqualJustice
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:05pm

    Progressives have the NERVE to say Conservatives are waging a war on women? This is just horrifying and these people care more about baby seal than the life of a pre-born CHILD! Sickening. God help us.

    Report Post » EqualJustice  
  • 00gabooga
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:00pm

    The Final Solution was planned with less efficiency and callousness.

    Report Post » 00gabooga  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:35pm

      @TuckerRichard

      Say goodbye to your brand new Blaze account. : )

      Report Post » The-Monk  
  • Walkabout
    Posted on May 29, 2012 at 11:59am

    The Liberals War Against Women continues!

    Report Post »  
    • HKS
      Posted on May 29, 2012 at 12:25pm

      If you wanta know what a liberal is up to, just listen to what they are bitching about, you guessed it, that’s what there doing.

      Report Post » HKS  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love