Genealogists’ Shock Claim: Obama Is Likely a Descendant of the First American Slave (Through His Mother!)
- Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:05pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
This week, genealogists have come out with a shocking claim — that President Barack Obama is likely a descendant of John Punch, the first documented American slave. According to Ancestry.com, the nation’s first black president is potentially Punch’s 11th great-grandson.

Ancestry.com's family tree of Obama's alleged connection to Punch
As NPR notes, this first informational tidbit is shocking enough in itself, but the story doesn’t end there. To add to the intrigue, Obama‘s connection to America’s first slave comes through his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who was caucasian. The New York Times has more about Punch’s past history:
In 1640, Mr. Punch, then an indentured servant, escaped from Virginia and went to Maryland. He was captured there and, along with two white servants who had also escaped, was put on trial. His punishment — servitude for life — was harsher than what the white servants received, and it has led some historians to regard him as the first African to be legally sanctioned as a slave, years before Virginia adopted laws allowing slavery.
Historians say there was a trade in human labor, of both whites and blacks, during this period in American history. There were also some free African-Americans. Beginning around 1617, indentured servants were bought and sold, as were debtors, in the Chesapeake Bay region, said Ira Berlin, a University of Maryland professor and expert in the history of slavery. But while those people were in an “unfree condition,” he said, historians cannot pinpoint a date for the beginning of the slave trade.

Interestingly, Obama‘s status and Punch’s past historical context create a fascinating picture, especially if the connection is legitimate.
“Two of the most historically significant African Americans in the history of our country are amazingly directly related,” Ancestry.com genealogist Joseph Shumway said in a statement. ”John Punch was more than likely the genesis of legalized slavery in America. But after centuries of suffering, the Civil War, and decades of civil rights efforts, his 11th great-grandson became the leader of the free world and the ultimate realization of the American Dream.”
While genealogists told The New York Times that the study is accurate, it can’t be determined with full-proof certainty that Obama is Punch’s relative, because the paper trail doesn’t reach back far enough. Still, DNA evidence seems to corroborate the connection. Based on the attained information, Obama’s mother was tied to African ancestors. Then, to further advance the connection, experts looked at marriage and property records to the time and place where Punch resided, NPR reports.
A press release from Ancestry.com provides more information about the research:
The discovery is the result of years of research by Ancestry.com genealogists who, through early Virginia records and DNA analysis, linked Obama to John Punch. An indentured servant in Colonial Virginia, Punch was punished for trying to escape his servitude in 1640 by being enslaved for life. This marked the first actual documented case of slavery for life in the colonies, occurring decades before initial slavery laws were enacted in Virginia.
In the 372 years since, many significant records have been lost – a common problem for early Virginia (and the South in general) – destroyed over time by floods, fires and war. While this reality greatly challenged the research project, Ancestry.com genealogists were able to make the connection, starting with Obama’s family tree.
The documents have been published on the Ancestry.com web site and are entitled, “Obama-Bunch Key Documents.” You can read the Times piece for more extensive information on the alleged connection.
(H/T: NPR)





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (624)
Seth Patriot
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:28pmMaybe he’s related to Elizabeth Warren too and is part Cherokee.
Report Post »sdeakins
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:39pmHe does have high cheeks.
Report Post »RamonPreston
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:50pm@ sdeakins Go ahead and say it. Don’t beat around the bush. MOOshell has a big ar$e.
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:53pmLies Lies and more Lies.
Report Post »orkydorky
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:55pmOh, Please! My guess is he is the descendant of the first snake!
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:58pmTwo commies went to Harvard. One claimed she was an Indian and one Claimed he was born in Africa. The Female Commie has Zero Cherokee blood, and in fact her family persecuted the Cherokee Indians.
Report Post »The Male Commie has Ozero Slave Blood from a white Mother, but it might help him politically to have 1/82 Slave blood. I see, huh, this isn’t commie propaganda is it? Naw..both Commie said, “You didn’t build that….
NHwinter
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:02pmbecause she never wanted the government involved in our lives.
I mention this bit of personal history to help you understand that millions of Americans, including your parents and grandparents, grew up like me during the Great Depression and never expected nor wanted the government to offer them anything other than an opportunity – - and now to see what Obama is trying to do to our country tends to make you crazy.
As some of you know, my “Scare Me” letter went viral with millions of hits on the internet during the past 3 years. I have now written a follow-up letter, which I will now share with you.
To the editors:
“In April 2009, I sent President Obama and the New York Times a letter titled “You Scare Me” because, as a candidate, he promised to “fundamentally transform America .” Now, after observing his performance for over three years, he no longer scares me – - he terrifies me for the following reasons:
FIRST: He has done more to damage America ‘s standing in the world, to lower
the standard of living in America , to impoverish future generations, and to shake our faith in the country’s future than any other American president in history.
SECOND: With a compliant Democrat congress, a lapdog media, and a weak,
Report Post »almost nonexistent Republican opposition, he has shattered the American dream of job security, home ownership, and rugged individualism for millions of Americans and has poisoned and divided our civil society with his politics of en
NHwinter
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:07pmof envy, class warfare, race warfare, and religious warfare – - which he is using as fundamental building blocks for his ‘socialist’ agenda.
THIRD: Culturally, he remains totally out of touch with traditional American
values. This has absolutely nothing to do with race or where he was born, rather it has everything to do with where, how and with whom he was raised, schooled, educated, trained, and associates with – - still today.
FOURTH: He has surrounded himself with naive academicians, lawyers, politicians, bureaucrats, and socialist leaning czars who arrogantly think and behave exactly as he does. People who offer no balanced suggestions, or devil’s advocate positions, and think in lock step with him that big government is the answer to all our problems.
FIFTH: He not only encourages, but aids and abets the unionization of all American industry, the albatross around the neck of the free market. In turn, they provide the money and muscle to intimidate his opponents.
SIXTH: He has increased the national debt by over 30% in just three years. If re-elected, and this rate of increase continues, America will be burdened with an unsustainable 20 trillion dollar debt which will result in the country’s financial death.. Recovery will be impossible – - America will be the Greece of 2016.
SEVENTH: Given his fanatical beholding to the ‘environmental’ and ‘man-caused global warming’ fringe, he has deliberately discouraged U.S. fossil fuel exploration
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:09pmSEVENTH: Given his fanatical beholding to the ‘environmental’ and ‘man-caused global warming’ fringe, he has deliberately discouraged U.S. fossil fuel exploration and production, while wasting billions of tax payer dollars on solar, wind, and algae experiments. He refuses to accept that oil, gas, and coal are not America ’s enemies, they are America ’s assets – - which, properly managed, could make us energy independent within a generation.
EIGHTH: He views the U.S. as a power in retreat which abused its World dominance. Therefore, he systematically apologizes round the world. This past March, he whispered to Russian President Medvedev – - “This is my last election. After my election, I will have more flexibility”. Just what is the secret that Obama and Putin are concealing from the American people until after the election? With what other leaders has he made similar secret agreements?
NINTH: And finally, after all his miss-steps, bad decision-making, poor management, and zero leadership, the fact that he has the audacity to seek
re-election should terrify every American.
I predict that if re-elected, future historians and political interpreters will look back at the eight-year period 2008-2016, and conclude “the 44th President of the U.S. allowed the takers to overpower the payers, which resulted in the greatest economy in history vanishing from the face of the Earth”. Farewell America , the World will really miss you!!”
Lou Pritchett April 1
Report Post »VoteBushIn12
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:43pmThe isn’t as surprising as you think.
If you go back 13 generations, as they did here, you will find that you have over 8 thousand grand parents at that level of your family tree. (2^13)
You’re bound to find someone noteworthy – maybe not the first slave, but at least SOMEONE.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:49pmThe first person to legally own a slave was Anthony Johnson, a black man.
http://guides.wikinut.com/Anthony-Johnson%3B-American-s-First-Slave-Owner/20va9y_5/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnsjiIHGkbc
The first salve was John Casar who was declared a slave belonging to Anthony Johnson and not an indentured servant by a court of law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casor
Report Post »scootervanneuter
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:58pmOh God that’s funny
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:59pmThe first person to legally own a slave was Anthony Johnson, a black man.
http://guides.wikinut.com/Anthony-Johnson%3B-American-s-First-Slave-Owner/20va9y_5/
The first salve was John Casar who was declared a slave belonging to Anthony Johnson and not an indentured servant by a court of law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casor
MCDAVE
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:04pm@NHWINTER here is the rest of the list It goes to 8000 of what obama and the politicians have done to us..It is as complete a list as I have ever seen. http://american-trojan-horse.blogspot.com/ we have every cause to through most of them out of office and into prison
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:09pm…we don’t know jack about this guy due to the secrecy of his recent past…unvetted…but NOW some group of “scientists” can trace his ancestry back to THE first slave…i’m sickened.
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:12pmNice one OrkyDorky.
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:18pmI’m not even going to read this b.s. They must really think we are idiots!
Just remember this when you hear about this: GLOBAL WARMING SCAM And they have the crooked scientists to prove it too.
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:01pmHis name IS NOT obama you IDIOTS !
Maybe that is what they are trying to do, make you forget his other three names, Geezzzz ..
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:23pmThe “Idiot” comment is for we’ll rob you and lie . com I mean ancestry .com ..
AH’s
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:26pmI could really give a “flying flip”
Report Post »hatchetjob
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:55pmThe ones on his bottom are high too.
Report Post »BlazingBob
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:08pmI agree with MIDWESTHIPPIE (”We don’t know jack about this guy due to the secrecy of his recent past but NOW some group of “scientists” can trace his ancestry back to THE first slave”) Hmm..There is something very sinister going on here. Why would they start preempting his ancestry unless a scandal is about to break and they want to soften the blow back…any ideas?
Report Post »Wolfgang the Gray
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:09pmI don’t believe if one bit. The Obama regime has been nothing but a propaganda mill, churning out lies. I don’t trust BHO further than I could throw the Hoover Dam. That’s right, Hoover Dam. Muhahaha /8-).
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:35pmI call bullsh@t let’s see ALL the birth certificates.
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:38pmNot to be a spoil sport, but who paid for this fantastic bit of geneologic fiction???
Report Post »historyguy48
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:52pmAnd here I thought he was directly related to Caesar. You know the one in Planet of the Apes!
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 9:29pmIm sure of one thing. He was born of a Jackal
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 9:56pmThis guy is Rosemarys Baby. Notice how they all gather around to protect their annointed one
Report Post »ThatsJustCrazyTalk
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 9:56pmThis story brought to you by the same people who brought you, “Obama’s Official(ly fake) Birth Certificate.”
In tune Christians can see what is happening here. Obama is making himself even “more black” to African-Americans who already voted 95% Obama, while those voting off the “white guilt” impulse will also connect more, too.
What’s astonishing to me are these “genealogists” can excavate this ancestry on Obama, but can’t find out where he grew up, or his college transcripts. I call Bull-Shnikes!
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 10:00pmBFD. So, what else is new? Warren is Cherokee, why can’t obama be whatever?
Report Post »rawmilker
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 10:43pmWOW, what a story! Just so happens that this one guy from Kenya is related to the very first slave, whew, now thats something, really something. These people can sure come up with some good lies to try to get some sympathy, i wonder if they sit around at night and concoct these tall tales. Man o man, this takes the cake. lololol
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 10:54pmWhen it come to Bolsheviks and their Communist Party (Democratic Party) there is no level they won’t swoop down to. Propaganda works no matter how ridiculous it sounds. The end justifies the means. In this case, it‘s to make you feel like a slave owning racist if you don’t reelect for this son of slaves (through his white family-that’s now actually black). As the genius Al Gore once said, “everything that is supposed to be down is up and everything that is supposed to be up is down.” Brilliant words and so fitting for the times we live in.
Blacks kept saying Barry Soreto or Obama or whatever his name is wasn’t an “authentic” black. He had no slave blood in him. Well, low and behold-now he is a former slave. Just like magic his white family is now actually black and not just any black, but the black of the first slave in America. That’s some pretty fancy propaganda. Why stop at just saying Obama now has slave blood in him? Go out all out and say he is the descendent of the original first slave in America-slave #1. Go big or go home. Joseph Goebbels would have to be proud as they took a page right out of his book.
This propaganda is no different than the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 30s. All great communist leaders make up fantasy stories about where they came from to help justify their dictatorship. Who would have guessed the 1930s would be repeating all over again 80 years later? Only this time the US is the Soviet Union.
Report Post »http://english.pravda
db321
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 11:57pmObama thinks he is God’s only begotten son! Part the sea and all that.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 1:52amAncestry.com: “Thus, there is no doubt that John Bunch II and Paul Bunch share a common ancestor. One of John Bunch II’s 5th great-grandsons (through his son David Bunch, Samuel’s brother) has a yDNA profile that matches all but two of 67 markers, with a 5th great-grandson of Paul Bunch. This is a very tight match.”
Report Post »——–
Tight match, my @ss. That blood sample was TAMPERED WITH by Van Jones or Jarrett or one of the Bunches. You think I’m stupid? I followed the OJ Simpson trial.
maverick4harlot
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 2:39amThe strongest reason 4 the people 2 retain the right 2 keep & bear arms is, as a last resort, 2 protect themselves against tyranny in government.
“Was the government to prescribe to us our MEDICINE & DIET, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now.”
“I would rather be exposed 2 the inconveniences attending too much liberty than 2 those attending too small a degree of it. ”
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted & better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson one of the most intelligent men in our past history. But by todays standards somehow one our most intelligent forfathers is considered stupid
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try 2 take it.. THOMAS JEFFERSON
THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NOT BE NEEDED UNTIL THEY TRY 2 TAKE IT. THOMAS JEFFERSON
THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NOT BE NEEDED UNTIL THEY TRY 2 TAKE IT. THOMAS JEFFERSON
HE WROTE THE CONSTITUTION THAT MADE U FREE & HATED SLAVERY. DO YOUR HOMEWORK. PROVE ME WRONG.
CHRISTOPHER L CLARK
5886 AZALEA STREET
PORT ORANGE FLORIDA 32127
Dont come 2 my house. Lets argue instead. U beat me so be it. I will a
Report Post »RobMac03
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 2:43amWasnt he supposed to be irish a couple of weeks back?
Report Post »maverick4harlot
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 2:43amOMG THAT MEANS WE OWE HIM THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, NOT, BULL SHEET, WHO GIVES A SHEET. i WILL BE GLAD TO TELL YOU WHAT MEANS MORE.
“The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
“ THE BEAUTY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT IT WILL NPOT BE NEEDED UNTILL THEY TRY TO TAKE IT” THOMAS JEFFERSON
Report Post »maverick4harlot
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 2:53amHe’s only this stupid because he is the brother of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. It’s the ONLY way to be so stupid.
Report Post »Armed Patriot
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 6:25amJoseph Shumway was asked in a CBS news interview, How confident are you…” Shumway said, Exteremly confident”. He didnt say positive. I call POPPYCOCK.
Hey Glenn… what is Joseph Shumway’s background???
Report Post »Macman1138
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 7:24amSeems that burning coal goes way back in the fambly.
Report Post »grudgywoof
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 8:19amMy great great great so on and so forth grandparents were Adam and Eve. So I’m related to this guy some how right? I guess when the Lord comes back then we will all see we are all related. More foolishness of man.
Report Post »MidwestRay
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 8:29amSo according to ancestry.com claims, Obama’s branch from the first slave was the “white” branch that would have belonged to the plantation owners. This would obviously mean that for generations, Obama’s ancestors were the original slave owners until Abe Lincoln, a Republican, came in and put an end to slavery.
Report Post »poorrichard09
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 8:34amPssst…and he won’t show his birth certificate cuz Frank M Davis is his biological daddy. Any bets?
Report Post »MidwestRay
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 8:35amThe company said records suggested that Mr. Punch fathered children with a white woman, who passed her FREE STATUS on to those children, giving rise to a family of a slightly different name, the Bunches, that ultimately spawned Mr. Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. Obama was a slave owner!
Report Post »jandersn
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 8:44amI am so relieved to know that Obama’s mammy was not the first white woman in the family to be smitten by a severe case of black snake fever.
Report Post »rickc34
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 10:12amFirst gay President now first slave President?
Report Post »Krutch
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 10:41amI can’t wait to hear bama walks on water too!
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 11:59amMy last post was CENSORED, for whatever reason. Here it is rephrased:
This research is based on conjecture, which Ancestry.com conveniently labels “negative disprove.” BUT as Carl Sagan noted, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” Here’s an example:
=> “Studying and understanding the chronology of John Bunch II and Paul Bunch is critical in reducing the number of candidates who MIGHT be their father and discovering the identity of the original Bunch progenitor.” (emphasis added)
Ancestry.com contends that doKumented evidence is not required:
=> “Negative disproof” means eliminating or disproving alternative hypotheses, often based on the argument of what DOES NOT occur in a record. Conclusions about the Colonial South are often reached by building cases from a body of evidence, rather than finding one doKument [spelling edited] that conveniently ‘proves’ a point.” (emphasis added)
Notice that scientific rigor is depreciated by their use of the phrase “conveniently ‘proves,’ ” in reference to doKumented evidence. This is convoluted BS, folks.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 12:33pmANCESTRY.COM: “Due to the destruction of records, no one can definitively prove or disprove the conclusion that John Punch was President Obama’s immigrant ancestor.”
Report Post »—–
We don’t have to DISPROVE anything. The burden of prove lies on you, MORONS. This is one case where Russell’s teapot DOES apply. In other words, the fact that a conjectural claim cannot be disproven does NOT NOT NOT shift the burden of proof on those who do not believe said claim/BUNCH OF CROCK.
woodruff
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 1:58pmMaybe, just maybe he’s the King of England as I know his Queen wishes she thad a royal title as well.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 3:26pmit just doesn’t get any sillier than this.
Report Post »coachsteve
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 5:54pmLet me see if I get this straight… We can’t get a real look at his Birth Certificate, or his school transcripts, and so forth – but suddenly, less than 100 days before the election, we now KNOW he is a DIRECT DESCENDENT of the first slave? Good thing, Mr. Obama, he wasn’t a GAY slave!
Report Post »KYHighlander
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 6:48pmDid anyone else notice that Allred was one of his ancestors, wonder if that is a link to Gloria? LOL
Report Post »ilduce
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 7:36pmYes, high cheekbones and he speaks with forked tongue.
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 8:58pmApparently, we can all make the same claim as it cannot be verified. This is news? And what does it matter…..
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 11:05pmAnd they know the name of the first slave in this country how?
Report Post »RocksCryOut
Posted on August 1, 2012 at 10:29amAccording to university professor…there’s your sign.
Report Post »Realist4U
Posted on August 1, 2012 at 11:31amHahahahaha! Let me get this right….they can trace Soetoro back to the first slave, but, they can’t get a real birth certificate from him? Uhhhh…I don’t believe this can be topped. They are far into the “fourth stage Liberalism.”
Report Post »sixtysix
Posted on August 1, 2012 at 1:08pmOn the other hand, there’s a ***** man. Wonder why Oboma so mistrusted his white mother and grandmother seeing that they must, at one time have love (literally) a black person. Besides, since the name slave comes from Slav because of the number of those people the Romans enslaved, I doubt Mr. Oboma can be descended from the “first” slave.
Report Post »tucanofulano
Posted on August 1, 2012 at 3:10pmNot possible for “The Immaculated One” to be related to any human.
Report Post »IMD14DFN
Posted on August 2, 2012 at 11:16amHe is also related to Shawn Hannity(he won’t admit , though!) , Phyllis Diller , Keith Richards , and the creature from the black lagoon .
Report Post »IMD14DFN
Posted on August 2, 2012 at 9:07pmHe is also related to Mr. Magoo , Shawn Hannity (though he won’t admit it) , Keith Richards , and the creature from the black lagoon .
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:27pmI don‘t care if he’s a decendent of an eel. He sucks and he is gone this November.
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:36pmOle chicken legs has no shame ..
Report Post »right-wing-waco
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:42pmI couldn’t agree more. I like the button worn by someone at the “Restore Love” gathering. It said something like “Mormon not Moron”
Report Post »myway
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:46pmAmen! Amen!
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:53pmLou Pritchett is one of corporate America ’s true living legends — a former P & G executive, an acclaimed author, a dynamic teacher, and one of the world’s most highly rated speakers. It was he who changed the way America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to be known as “Partnering”.
You may remember a previous letter he wrote in 2009 to Obama and the New York Times, which went viral.
From a speech given by Lou Pritchett April 15, 2012
“I was born in year two of the Great Depression (1931) and spent the first 10 years of my life, influenced by the extreme hardships of the depression. –By today’s standards my family was about a mile below today’s so called ‘poverty level’; but if you never ‘had’ – - doing without was not so ‘bad’. Borrowing shoes to graduate from the 8th grade didn’t seem at all demeaning because most of the 8th graders did the same thing.
In June 1944, my only brother, Joe, was killed in action on Utah Beach in Normandy , France during the D-Day landings. Exactly one year later, my father died and left me, my mother, and my sister to go it alone – - and alone we went. My mother went to work at a department store, my sister dropped out of school and joined her, and I went to work shining shoes on the streets of Memphis for a dime a shine. Government assistance was not available, and if it were, I am confident my mother would have refused it, because she never wanted the government invol
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:11pmThis continues in the first section. Sorry it is out of order, but thought it was important to share.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:36pmI don’t know Tron, this changes everything for me. I think I’ll vote for him this time! NOT!
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:53pmThe first person to legally own a slave was Anthony Johnson, a black man.
http://guides.wikinut.com/Anthony-Johnson%3B-American-s-First-Slave-Owner/20va9y_5/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnsjiIHGkbc
The first salve was John Casar who was declared a slave belonging to Anthony Johnson and not an indentured servant by a court of law.
Report Post »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casor
Gonzo
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:14pmMonk, it’s really racist of you to point out the truth. :-)
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:24pmHi Gonzo,
I guess if Ancestry.com went back far enough they might find Adam and Eve. : )
CNN just did a story on this and the Ancestry.com lady said that the birth records were destroyed in the Civil War so they “used” other records like Church and land owner records. Too freaking funny!
Report Post »subic
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 10:37pmhahahahahahahaha….what a load of crap! the dude won‘t even produce a real birth certificate and now they’re saying hes a decendant of a slave? hahahahahahahahahhaha… this clown is a real joke.
Report Post »tweetybird
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:24pmRight……..they must be trying to get the black vote again. Everything with Obama = Politics. Nothing more.
Report Post »ErinLindsey
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:34pmI thought it was kind of funny that the headline says “Obama Is Likely a *Decedent* of the First American Slave”
Umm…Blaze…you’re doing it wrong again.
Definition of “decedent” is ‘a person who has died.’.
I think you meant to use the word “descendant”.
Other than that, I liked this article. It shows Obama’s desperation to hold onto the presidency. I dont believe the genealogists “research”. Faking a genealogical history is probably easier than faking a more recent birth certificate.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 10:24pmIf his relative was the 1st slave, it was his own people who captured him and sold him to the slave traders. Slaves were used all over the world, but America get the shaft. We all know the blacks in America have had a better life than the majority of them in Africa.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 11:14pmThat’s pretty funny .. since his FATHER’S side was most likely loading up the boat with people (slaves) they had captured .. I find it amazing that people don’t understand that those in AFRICA are the ones who sold people INTO slavery .. the whites didn’t go round em up!
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 12:09pm@TWEETYBIRD
Report Post »Don’t be cynical. This study proves he can fix the economy, now that he knows he descends from Indentured Servant 1.
bobby12
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:21pmThey can trace back to 1680 but can’t find his college transcripts!!
Report Post »dawghowse
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:43pmWhere’s the like button! Well said!
Report Post »spirited
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:51pmYep!
Report Post »BoyScout_Mom
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:35pmLol
Report Post »sallyredneck
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:53pmYou took the words right out of my mouth, can’t believe any search till they show us the current info.
Report Post »right field
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:55pm“Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.” –
Report Post »Sir Walter Scott (Marmion, 1808)
So right you are to point out the “new vetting” scenario that is being dished out by the Marxist Media and the useful idiots.
thegreatcarnac
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:00pm……and we can’t really say his birth certificate is not a fake….
Report Post »Logistician
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:11pmBingo. Or his non-digitized birth certificate.
Report Post »RaymondofCanada
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:30pmI am so amused! I can’t stop laughing!
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 4:16amMythology in making. Fake as a three dollar bill. Stanley Ann Dunham‘s identity is as synthetic as Obozo’s. Granted, she was his mother, but Dunhams weren’t her birth parents. Se was “assigned” to them by fellow travelers higher in hierarchy and all the stuff before 1948 (actually, not much of it, there is a sheer paucity of any data, except alleged birth date/place) was simply made up and greased through.
Report Post »pirate052
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 6:51amOr a Birth Certificate, go figure
Report Post »Dobodura
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 10:53amI’ve dabbled a bit in genealogy tracing my own family history. If they can trace his family history back to the first slave (supposedly) they certainly should be able to tell which country he was born in. Of course, his fake birth certificate says Hawaii, but shouldn’t the genealogists be able to figure out whether or not that was even possible my looking at various passenger lists?
Report Post »Torey
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:20pmSo he has a Ancestor that was a Slave…. So does Thousands of other African-Americans in this country… Sorry but that doesn’t change my opinion about him… He has done a Horrible job as president n needs to be replaced along with Congress as-well.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:12pmAnd Stanley Dunham was white.
Report Post »Metalstr8jckt
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:20pmSince verifiable DNA must be present in the male descendant, the DNA of the original Mr. Punch must be used as the control. Otherwise any claim of “DNA’ match is just communist spin.
Same B.S. as the Jefferson descendant myth. DNA tests proved he did not sire males through his slave.
Report Post »Commies do not like the genuine application of science because it shows them to be liars.
Metalstr8jckt
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:40pmHELLO! Look at the top two entries in this “family tree” the name changes from Punch to Bunch. The researcher is assuming that no one will notice this ‘small’ change.
Insulting to everyone’s intelligence who can read. Obama; I would fire this spin doctor. A 3rd grader can read a flow chart.
Report Post »wboehmer
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:07pmHey, remember this is Øbama we’re talking about, so this all most likely is a bunch (punch??) of baloney.
Either way, who cares?
Report Post »Taquoshi
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 8:58pmTo MetalStraight -
Just a word of caution about the spelling of the surnames Punch/Bunch. As an amatuer genealogist, I’ve spent significant time with old records, including those from the 1600′s. The scribe who wrote the record may have spelled it incorrectly, since P and B sound very similar. Or the original scribe spelled it correctly and a subsequent transcription mis-read it. Unlike the French, the English did not codify their spelling until much later and here in America, Noah Webster’s Blue Backed Speller and his Dictionary helped move that forward. But that was much later in history. I do not believe that this was an attempt by anyone to pass off a false genealogical line.
Names often change. My father in law changed his first name, and the spelling of his last name. My own name has changed four times. While things like this are confusing, they are also common. I would not read anything political into the early portion of the genealogy.
The scary part for me is the attempt to link B.O. to our earliest history.
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:19pmDoes this mean someone has released his records?…This is truly Laughable.
Report Post »Obama Snake Oil Co
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:27pmIf he were re elected…..would he be blaming the economy on the last presdient Barry Soetoro?
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:56pmNo, he will blame our founding fathers and their constitution
Report Post »Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:19pmHe’s Omni-Racial, Omni-religious, and savior of us all. He’s everything we need. Geesh, why is this so hard for y’all to understand?
Report Post »IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:19pmSo, we all have an ancestor and we don’t have to make things up.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:18pmA sentance of lifetime servitude…..Makes a lot more sense than modern punishment – sitting around a jail cell watching Ricki Lake
Report Post »carpee
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:17pmnone of this changes the fact that hes a commie…
get the hell out of the oval office
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:17pmWhat the article fails to tell is that Anthony Johnson who took possession of John Punch through the courts system was himself black.
Report Post »happ77
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:51pmI was going to point that out, glad someone did.
Report Post »First black slaveowner was himself black.
spirited
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:56pmHmmm, was Anthony Johnson a distant relative of Sharpton, Jesse and/or Sheila Jacskon, James Clyburn… ?
Report Post »Zipit
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 7:40amI for one believe it. Someone just showed me a copy of Obama’ birth certificate! It said right on there, “descendant of first slave”. How can ya argue?
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:16pmI‘m really surprised we are not covered with GOD’s vomit!
Are these people NUTS???????
Report Post »jake-spoon
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:12pmGranny, you so crazy.
Report Post »Chevalier
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:15pmWho cares?
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:15pmObama is desperate. Unbelievable.
Report Post »ssanda
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:14pmOh brother! What next? Is going to be the 300th great-grandson of Noah?
Report Post »TheBurningTruth
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:41pmCan’t be. One has to believe in the Bible to believe in Noah. No, we‘ll hear next that he’s a cross between the 60th grandson of the profit mohammad and the latest reincarnation of the Dali Laima. But certainly NOTHING Christian.
Report Post »Constructionist
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:14pmSHOCK CLAIM: The Blaze fails to proof read another headline!
Report Post »mils
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:17pmditto..
Report Post »Steve28
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:10pmNoticed that also. Also got the last name wrong. Kind of shoddy work guys!
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:13pmKnow what a Kenite is ? That is who he is a decendent of ..
Report Post »JohnLarson
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:13pmSome of you need a John Punch to the face..
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:17pmQuiet little boy ..
Report Post »Torey
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:23pmYou can try but you prolly wont like what happens after.
Report Post »Sargent12
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:24pmway to go its so ridiculous they are reaching for something
Report Post »DimmuBorgir
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:24pmi thought it was funny
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:32pmOr, a John Punch Line…oh wait…I guess that would be 0bama after all.
Report Post »Sy Kosys
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:54pmBut coming from a Democrat, wouldn’t that be a donkey-punch?
Report Post »MODEL82A1
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:13pmAnd, let me guess, the same “genealogist” will next “find” that Mitt Romney is a descendant of John Punch’s Owner, right?
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:36pmNo, Anthony Johnson who ‘owned’ John Punch was a free black man.
Report Post »MODEL82A1
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:47pmRJJ, And that fact eliminates Mitt Romney from Mr. Johnson’s Family Tree how, exactly?
Report Post »spirited
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:00pmNext they’ll infrom that Barack Obama is Abraham Lincoln reincarnated (litter-aly).
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:53pmOkay, I’ll change that to I seriously doubt it. Just an humble opinion, but you do have a point.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:15pmHi RJJ,
I guess if Ancestry.com went back far enough they might find Adam and Eve. : )
Also, it wasn’t John Punch, it was John Casar, who Anthony Johnson was awarded the first slave by a court of law. See my other posts above.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:28pmHi MONK, Dang, you’re right. That was John Casar. I knew that it was Anthony Johnson who actually did own the first black slave, but he did begin his servitude as an indentured servant. He and two white servants escaped from Johnson and were later recovered. The two white servants received more time as servants in court, but Casan was ordered to serve the rest of his life to Johnson making him the actual first black slave in the Americas. When I attempted to look up John Punch to see if he was Johnson’s slave, all that I found were one story after another regarding 0bama. Thanks for that correction. Punch must have been the first black brought to this country as a slave from the beginning.
Report Post »carolewash
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 2:10pmActually Mitt’s family tree is probably correct and complete all ready. It won’t be done by Ancestry.com, thats for sure.
Report Post »wendybar
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:11pmWhy of course he is. The msm needs something for him to run on. He still isn’t a good president.
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:11pmOkay, getting ridiculous now, people.
Report Post »TheLeftMadeMeRight
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:11pmAnd they just discoveed this now? Total load of BS….
Report Post »Wool-Free Vision
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:10pmPropaganda from NPR? You don’t say! Ancestry.com must have gotten some stimulus money.
Report Post »jharper
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:33pmIt’s obvious it is a “SHOVEL READY JOB”.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:44pmAncestry.com is trying to get back in the Progs good graces after they failed to provide the lineage to support Fauxchohantas Lizzie being a full-blooded Cherokee.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:47pmIt won‘t support their agenda but I’m guessing if they tried hard enough they could also find Stanley Ann’s genealogy likely also traces back to a slave owner.
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:09pmO Brother ..
Trying the sympathy route ? This is truely laughable, Idiots ..
Report Post »