Gingrich Makes it Official: ‘Today I Am Suspending the Campaign’
- Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:25pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

AP
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Wednesday officially ended his campaign for president, but did so without an endorsement of Mitt Romney.
“Today I am suspending the campaign,” Gingrich said during a 23-minute speech in Virginia surrounded by his family, exactly one week after sources first said he would drop his bid.
While Gingrich has said he would back the eventual Republican presidential nominee — and was expected to throw his support behind Romney — he stopped short of offering an official endorsement of the former Massachusetts governor.
“The question I’m asked sometimes, is Mitt Romney a conservative?” Gingrich said. “My answer is, compared to Barack Obama?”
Gingrich frequently criticized and drew into question Romney’s conservative credentials on the campaign trail.
“This is not a choice between Mitt Romney and Ronald Reagan,” he continued. “This is a choice between Mitt Romney and the most radical leftist president in American history.”
Following Gingrich’s announcement, the Romney campaign said in a statement: “Newt Gingrich has brought creativity and intellectual vitality to American political life.”
Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul are the only two candidates remaining in the race; Romney leads the delegate count with 847 to Paul’s 80. 1,144 delegates are needed to clinch the GOP nomination.
Gingrich said the campaign had been “an amazing year” for him and his family.
This post has been updated.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (144)
P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:45pmDear Paulbots:
Mitt Romney will ABSOLUTELY be the republican nominee. There is NOT some vast conspiracy to lie about the delegate count. There will NOT be a brokered convention. Romney was NOT made the nominee by some secretive “establishment” – he is our nominee because of the MILLIONS of American voters who picked him.
Seriously, leave the conspiracies to Art Bell and the midnight Coast to Coast AM crowd. Time to face reality – the American voters picked the other guy – NOT Ron Paul. Get over it!
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:56pmThat is what your hoping for. But reality will soon sink in for ya.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:04pmi give romney a 95% chance of winning nomination. still a chance for ron paul
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:33pm@SOYBOMB315 –
You’ve always been the most logical of the Paulistinians… but unfortunately, I don’t believe Paul even has a 5% chance.
Report Post »ImMormon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:41pm@ Mr. Crooks,
I wish there were someway to hold our comments to some sort of accountability… no necessarily to say rub it in when you are proven wrong, but so that your comments are discredited more and more over time.
Sorry to be blunt, but I’m tired of the ridiculous comments and tirades by some people on here!
Report Post »mrsuperpat
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:07pmRomney is a phony. He has no support, just money to try and buy votes. Paul has a huge grassroots following knocking on doors, giving money in small donations, and SHOWING UP AND TAKING THE DELEGATES that are supposedly Romney’s. He is nervous but can’t start campaigning heavy in the last 14 states because it would destroy the illusion of his “assumed nomination. Only 4 of these states are winner take all and Paul will bill getting most of the delegates in the other 10 despite what straw poll crap the media shows. We are the REAL R3VOLUTION, all other political movements are disorganized and a joke. Why do you people even proudly support Romney. HE is OBAMA!!
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38
Any support for Romney is support for Obama, the only difference is their complexion. Sorry you can’t read through the media or establishment lies but we are taking over. The next couple of election cycles we will have taken enough leadership positions in the GOP that it will be immposible for Rino’s. You Romney bootlickers will have to join the Democratic Party:)
Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:29pm5%? you obviously have no idea how many of Romney delegates stealth Paul supporters and they can abstain voting on first round and than vote for who they want on 2nd.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:34pmPaul is winning the majority of delegates in many states. He already has MORE than enough to get on the ballot for nomination in Tampa.
If the delegates in Tampa do not listen to the Paul delegates, and they go ahead a nominate Romney, then Romney is going to LOSE. Even if he picks a Rubio or some other RINO with nice hair.
Here’s why. Romney doesn’t have the appeal to Independents, Libertarians, and recovering Democrats that realized they got more of the same with Barry. Romney can’t even get the “R” base excited after millions and millions of dollars spent, and all the free airtime on Fox.
Paul polls BEST among those 3 parties, but you wont see that on Fox News. The most recent public policy poll in Montana, shows Romney getting TROUNCED by Barry, while Paul beats Barry by 8 percentage points.
Nominate another McStain part 2, and you will see 4 more years. Mark my words.
Many people who have principles and an IQ over 90, are not going to fall for another “Goldman Sachs vs Goldman Sachs” election. Hell, we don’t even know if our votes are being counted with these rigged electronic voting machines.
Report Post »“He who casts the vote decides nothing. He who COUNTS the vote, decides everything.”
Joseph Stalin (dude who killed over 40 million people)
Here’s Pac Man being loaded onto a E-voting machine, with a thumb drive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpMDCArdzwA
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:40pm@ImMormon – You must have no idea what is going on with delegates, because Paul is snatching a whole lot and Romney has no where near what they say he has. I’ll never vote a Mormon, Your all crazy
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:41pmron paul can get all the delegates he wants but if he doesnt turn the tide in the popular vote, the party will FIND A WAY to make romney the winner. Ron Paul winning Texas would be a huge step. Texas is his home state – there is no excuse not to win it.
If Ron Paul cant win texas in a one-on-one matchup, then it doesnt matter how many delegates he shows up to the convention with…the party will revolt
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:49pmthe reason why he ain‘t getting popular vote is because of rigged elections and election fraud otherwise Romney supporters would flock and take over all the conventions or are Romney supporters really don’t like him or are they that stupid not to know how to go to convention and learn rules, i mean come on.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:50pmIt really does not matter how many delegates Ron Paul has at the convention. Unlike the other Candidates, Dr. Paul has said he is going to run the race until the there is a 0% chance of winning and we will keep fighting along side him for Freedom and Liberty until and long after that sad day.
“May Future Generations Look Back On Our Work And Say That These Were Men And Women Who, In A Moment Of Great Crisis, Stood Up To Their Politicians, The Opinion-makers, and the Establishment, and Saved Their Country” -Ron Paul
Report Post »RonPaulOrNoOne
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:52pm@soybomb315 – If he doesn’t win Texas than it is a 100 percent rigged. So let me get this straight.. Romney can get hundreds of thousands of votes but he can’t get that 100 of thousand to become delegates for him? And I don’t want to hear how Ron Paul Supporters are more organized. If you got a multi billionaire candidate that can get a 100 plus votes but can’t get delegates to sign for him makes it seem like the voting system is rigged.
Report Post »RonPaulOrNoOne
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:53pm@recoveringneocon – It does too matter how many delegates he has. Because Romney doesn’t have what the media says he has. It’s a lie. He has around 600. So See you at the brokered convention and be prepared to be shocked.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 8:20pmthroughout this primary, people like gingrich, perry, and santorum attacked romney in many ways that were below the belt and usually in desperate ways. However, ron paul refrained from any of that and any criticism of romney has been based on fact and romney’s principles.
Now that it is just romney and paul, the republican party and the media wont give paul a fair shake out and pretends the primary is over (ron paul blackout). Ron Paul’s whole strategy was to be the last one standing against romney. He has made it and now the media/establishment has turned their backs on the primary.
Not very fair considered how statesmanlike ron paul has run his campaign….
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 9:31pm@Patriot, Romney’s views on civil liberties are not consistent with freedom. My daughter deserves better.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 9:51pm@Soybomb
Wanting the corrupt MSM to be “fair” to Paul, is like wanting a drunken abusive husband to stop beating his wife. It’s just in their nature. That’s why they call them “presstitutes or whorespondents”
I wouldn’t expect a “win” in Texas either. I was born here, and many Texans are as stupid as the rest of the country. Dr. Paul has been advertising here, but I have only seen a couple of commercials. We just don’t have the money to compete with Goldman Sachs and the rest of the special interests that are behind Romrhoid.
Report Post »Our only chance is working in the delegate process here, and we are doing pretty well. We’ll see how the dog and pony straw vote goes.
I know one of Dr. Paul’s brothers here, and have gotten to visit with Dr. Paul and his wife on a few occasions. They are some of the most quality people you would ever meet. This now cesspool of a country, almost doesn’t deserve a man of his economic experience and integrity.
I think Dr. Paul was America’s last chance to get it right, and they are blowing it by either letting the media do their thinking for them, or by just being apathetic. . At least we will have fought the good fight, and our consciences will be clear.
The blame will rest on the other idiots’ shoulders, not ours.
recoveringneocon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:22pmMy point was We are in this until the end and beyond. Unlike Cain, Bachmann, Santorum, Newt and others. No matter what the delegate count is. We are not going away, so get used hearing about Freedom, Liberty, The Constitution, Founding Fathers, Sound Money, etc
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 4:27amHere, Here for the Ron Paul supporters on this mostly Neoconservative, progressive news sight. I know all of you hate being called those names. The fact still remains that our country has been heading for the cliff of socialism for decades now, behind our back and not to our knowledge, at least most of our knowledge, and now we see that we are in deep trouble. I was one of you also. A lightbulb went off in my head one day, and I could see what was happening. These corrupt organizations, that have the money to pull the strings, have been leading all of us right to where they want. A place where they, and all their future family, will be in charge of all the world through minipulation of the worlds currencies. They put up candidate after candidate, on both sides of the aisle, knowing that they can get the majority of the people to believe them and vote for their chosen puppet for the next four years. Now, that more people are waking to this fact, they have to put in machines in order to control the vote as they cannot trust the public will pick their puppet. That is our present voting system and society. Shame on all of us.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 4:44amEVERYONE should read this. Stop listening to the main stream media, they are going to head all of you to four more years of Obama. http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/05/romney-leads-obama-narrowly-in-montana.html
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 5:46amActually, I know a bunch of the Santorum people have defected Paul’s direction. I don’t know what percentage. I don’t know it its over budgetary or prolife, or civil libery issues, but Paul is better on all of those than Romney.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:24pmnewt gingrich – the conservative imposter and rogue agent of the romney campaign. romney needed gingrich to stay in the race as long as possible to avoid a pure romney v santorum matchup
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:07pmI don’t think it was him being a rouge agent I just think he was just so ego centric that he wanted to claim to be the only conservative alternative.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:43pmSantorum was never going to Win the GOP nomination
Report Post »He was just the last in a long line of Anyone But Romney’s
(Bachman,Perry,Cain,Gingrich An Ron Paul)
but Guess who we ended up with.
RightPolitically
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:18pmSorry to see you go Newt. You were my guy!
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:06pmWell I hope you can now jump on board the Romney train and take the white house back. I recommend if you really liked newt and want him represented still you should run for house and make sure Romney stays on the conservative agenda.
Report Post »pghpatriot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 11:20pmII’m with you! To all those who discount and discredit Gingrich because of his past personal mistakes I believe you have taken you eye off of the prize.
Considering who currently is in office, Gingrich is an altar boy. Not to mention all those previously enamored with the white teethed, big grin Clinton who used the White House as a whore house.
Gingrich was the one who had the ideas, plans, and hutzspa to bring about the most decisive changes needed to set us back on the Constitutional track.
I still believe Romney is too moderate, and Paul, although he has some great intentions, he is too radical for women, dems, and indepndnts to vote for. Like it or not, a vote for him will be a vote for obama. I don’t like Romney any more than I did McCann. But I dispise obama.
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 3:03amI voted McCain because of Sarah Palin maybe Romney will pick someone you will like to get you to vote for him I do think however McCain was far more Moderate and progressive then Romney. Romney is a low tax guy and has actual evidence with how he governed to be socially conservative also maybe not his words but his actual actions show otherwise he veto’d abortion laws and gay marriage laws so that shows he is socially conservative in my book. Also his healthcare law if you remember when it was being discusses was actually considered conservative now everyone hates it of course but also by focusing only on individual mandate you are missing the bigger picture on why the Obamacare is actually bad because they can take that part out easy and get everyone to say okay we like it now. We need to focus more on the fact that it will put all insurance companies out of business and control our lives with everything we do Romney‘s law would never do that because it just said you get fined if you don’t purchace health insurance. I am not a supporter of his law but it was nothing compared to ObamaCare and to say it is is naive and isn’t based on facts especially since ObamaCare was over 2000 pages and Romneycare was 70 pages. Now putting liberals in control of this plan was a bad Idea for Romney but he had 80 percent democrat legislature he had to work with them to get things done. He would not of done this in texas or any red state.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 4:38amN8, So you think that any mandate is OK? Even in the states, laws have to pass the test of the constitution. The constitution is the supreme law of the land. If a state law is unconstitutional, it is moot. We the people have given into unconstitutional laws and are now paying the price. Our country is about to go under and everyone thinks that more of the same is the way to go. If you continue to do what you’ve always done, you continue to get what you’ve always got. Is it enough? If a candidate has to move to the center, left or right, they are lying to you. You cannot make them move their poositions anywhere. They will do what is in their heart, good or bad. Have you ever seen a couple where one tried to change the other? It always ends badly. It just does not happen. Wake up people. Take a short term psychology class and start seeing people for what they are and not just what they say they are.
Report Post »perchhound
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:56pmJOHNNY , The america we both want
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:54pmGuess its time to start donating to Ron Paul…Romney is NO conservative…barely a step above obama…barely!
Report Post »ImMormon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:29pmOh if you only knew! Real research will show you much… or you can continue to the same half truthed rhetoric constantly uttered by your beloved Newt, or your fellow Ron Paul’ers. Regurgitate or research? I choose to inform myself with my own research, you?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:48pmwhy doesnt romney talk about the constitution or freedom? why does he only see government as a business venture?
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:57pmChristians don’t vote for Mormons
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:21pm@POLITICIANSRCROOKS –
Why would you try to bring the “mormon issue” into this? By the way, saying Christians won‘t vote for a Mormon is like saying fish won’t vote for a trout.
Also, you moniker is Politicians R Crooks – isn’t Ron Paul a politician?
Report Post »ImMormon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:33pm@ Soybomb
You are just regurgitating… have you listened to one full speech he’s given? Have your read his platform and positions… no because he references the constitution and founding fathers throughout! Almost every victory speech he’s given, he references both the founding fathers and the constitution!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmR8UVcwhsA
That is just one, but listen to every full speech he’s given, the vast majority are about returning to the constitution! Quit spewing the regurgitated rhetoric.
@ Mr. Crook
I’m sorry you feel that way… but you have been sorely misinformed throughout your life regarding how you should treat other people.
God Bless America!
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:42pm@P8riot – I’m just stating the truth. If your a true Christian, you will never vote Romney. Mormons offend me as a Christian.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 8:45pm@POLITICIANSRCROOKS – Your more than entitled to your own opinion regarding my religion, but don‘t you realize that Romney’s religion has NOTHING to do with how he will govern as President?
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 9:18pmOkay IMMORMAN..I’ll bite…why I think Mr. Romney is no conservative…he WAS prochoice until it suited him otherwise…he was prohomosexual marriage…until it suited him otherwise…he was pro socialized medicine until it suited him otherwise…CLASSIC POLITICIAN…someone I heard the other day summed up Romney for me in a nutshell…whoever his audience is at the time…that‘s what he’s for…I was mistaken when I said he was barely above obama..I meant John Kerry…classic flipflopper…and though I don’t vote for the president based on religion..I don‘t like the fact he’s a mormon as I’ve never liked Glen for that reason..but that‘s between you and God isn’t it?…mormons are nothing special in my book, as all religions fall short…just so you know….you might want to do a little “research” on that religion you practice so boldly… ie..your avatar :)
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:53pmIMMORMON, Research what? His position on the NDAA? Federal Reserve? Patriot Act? DHS? TSA? Healthcare? War? Draft deferments? CISPA? Our sovereignty? Gun ownership? etc… Well, I kind of already done that and I don’t like where he stands on any of those issues.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:54pmOh and welcome aboard, Godlovinmom. Glad to have ya!
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:25amThank you…at least with Ron Paul…he’s pretty consistant on where he stands…unlike Romney…Dear God help us!
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 7:42am@godlovinmom
Report Post »keep researching ron paul. The deeper you dig, the more you will like him. That is the opposite of any other candidate
ImMormon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:49pmI kind of liked Newt at the beginning of the campaign season… but I got really frustrated with him. It’s my opinion that he did more to hurt our party than help it. He claimed a “clean” race, but he has more sound bites the DNC will use against us than any other candidate. He did have “some” great ideas, but he divided us!
Yes, I know there were attack ads from the Romney side, but 95% of them were from a Super Pac that he had no control over. Romney rarely ever attacked another opponent unless it was in a debate where they could hash it out back and forth. Newt loved to throw little twisted one liners when Romney had no way to defend himself.
If this election is so-called “the most important in the history of our country” as he says it is, he would back Romney in the fight against Obama… but in his normal classless and prideful fasion he cannot.
Report Post »perchhound
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:57pmWell said
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:19pmNewt’s arrogance is only outdone by his tendency to tell every audience what they want to hear (i.e. Moon base in Florida (NASA)). His setup attacks on the press and inflammatory statements were classic Newt trying to get some attention and traction. His exit is no loss for the race and the country.
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:49pmI’ve been watching and listening to Gingrich for many years-even before the contract with America, which I admired the GOP for, but Newts ego has always been a problem. He and he alone has all the answers. He is a brilliant man and a great elder statesman, and that is what he should remain. He needs a refresher in sandbox 101, and learn to play well with others. I hope he will put aside his ego and help the country out, and put it first.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:45pmThe Blaze is not the media outlet that they said they were going to be, as in the truth? They are as bad as the MSM in the primary race coverage. Nothing about Ron Paul. I mean Racheal Madcow does a better job of reporting on Ron Pauls success: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMtlah4Iec&feature=youtu.be
Where is this story about Ron Paul’s R3VOLUTION taking over the GOP? http://ivn.us/2012/05/01/forget-the-nomination-ron-pauls-revolution-is-taking-over-the-republican-party/
All of you that are still just watching Fox or any other MSM, stop and start getting real election coverage at http://www.dailypaul.com/
Ron Paul has the ability to keep Romney from getting the 1144 needed at the convention and is going to be on the ballot at the convention. This is a Ron Paul coup and we are winning. Do not take my word for it, research yourself at sites that tell the truth.
Ron Paul 2012! The R3VOLUTION continues.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:00pmYeah Ron Paul will be the nominee and will beat Obama, Paul/Johnson 2012
Report Post »ImMormon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:14pmAll I hear is whine whine whine! If you hate the blaze so much, then why do you keep posting? You obviously can’t get enough of it. Also, how can I expect to get “real” election coverage from a site run by Ron Paul supporters… the dailypaul? Seriously?
You have every right to voice your opinion and I won’t stop you from doing that, but I will say that you sound as desperate, as classless, and as prideful as Newt. That’s the one thing I have yet to understand is why Paul supports act so much like Newt?
Take a lesson from your Paul notebook… show a bit of class! I guarentee Ron Paul will be the first and only candidate to back Mitt after he drops out or loses at the convention. Ron has been classy from the get go. I like him, but can’t stand a lot of his supporters… they are what turn me off of Paul more than Paul himself. He’s got gumption, I’ll give him that, but he has been nothing but a class act in this campaign, especially toward Romney.
What are you going to do when he throws his support behind Romney? Please do share!
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:04pm@IMMORMON and Ron Paul supporters
Report Post »Besides Ron Pauls crazy leftist foreign policy I like him he is bringing forth great discussions on monetary policy and the fed and cutting the deficit. I like him but his supporters are in my opinion no worse then Obama supporters they think they know so much about constitution but all they do is watch compiriacy theory videos on the bildiburgs and how they are controlling everything and the Jews have all the money and pick all the candadites. The people that support Ron Paul are fake conservatives because they would rather this country get destroyed by Obama then vote for someone who will reverse all the crap Obama did. Yes there is much corruption in politics in both sides of the isle but Romney as a person and Romney‘s conservative platform even if its not as conservative as mine would be or yours would be is a hell of a lot better then Obama’s communist agenda that will destroy this country I will be suprised if he even allows the election to go foward if he knows he is going to get destroyed by Romney.
justangry
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 9:16pm@N8isgrate, All I hear you say is… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlg45UcomRI&feature=relmfu
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:24pm@N8ISGRATE
So believing that Congress is the only one that can declare war and that if they do declare war, he will strike with every might that the US military has to offer, win the war and come home… that’s a leftist foreign policy? Believing that we should END foreign welfare (read: foreign aid) is a leftist foreign policy? Believing that other nation has a thing called national sovereignty is a leftist policy?
Wait a minute…..
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 2:41amThe President has broad constitutional power to take military action in response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. Congress has acknowledged this inherent executive power in both the War Powers Resolution and the Joint Resolution passed by Congress on September 14, 2001.
The President has constitutional power not only to retaliate against any person, organization, or State suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks on the United States, but also against foreign States suspected of harboring or supporting such organizations.
The President may deploy military force preemptively against terrorist organizations or the States that harbor or support them, whether or not they can be linked to the specific terrorist incidents of September 11.
http://www.justice.gov/olc/warpowers925.htm
It was voted on in congress to allow president powers to preemptively strike. So the notion that its not constitutional or war has to be voted on by congress both Iraq and Afgansitan followed these guidlines and were eventually voted on and won in house and senate.
Ron Paul believes we were the reason we were attacted on 911 and alot of people who like Ron Paul also believe it was an inside job. So telling me he doesn‘t have a leftist agenda with foreign policy doesn’t stick with me. But you may think that not doing anything and leaving people alone will mean peace for us you are both naive and stupid that is not the world we live in
Report Post »AllAmericanGirl22
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:36pmI supported Santorum, and he would have got the nomination if it hadn’t been for Newt. Now we’re stuck with a moderate liberal candidate, oh well, at least he’s not a commie. I will admit, Newt had some good ideas (sort of) and I don’t mean the moon colony thing. And it was nice to have someone else bashing Obama…
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:44pmYeah he is
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:35pmromney is half commie. next
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:39pm@INDIVIDUALISM – oh friggin brother! did you seriously just claim that Mitt Romney is a communist? This is exactly why Ron Paul will never win – his followers. You guys claim to be the ultimate patriots yet blame America for 9/11. You guys claim that anyone who doesn’t support “Dr. Paul” is a left wing, progressive, “neocon.” Tell me I’m wrong.
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:10pmI actually don’t believe Santorum would of gotten the nomination because they did poll Newt supporters and it was almost half and half for either Romney or Santorum. Newt supporters didn’t like Santorum otherwise they would of voted for him instead knowing he had a chance to beat Romney.
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:16pmI conntend Ron Paul supporters just like Obama supporters are Utopia mindset people who dream of a world that will never exist or be sucessful. Ron Paul legalise drugs prostitution this that the other we will have anarchy there isn‘t enough morality in this country to sustain that policy also he believes if we stop intervening in the world everyone will like us yah freakin right thats the most idiotic foreign policy ever worse then Obama’s foreign policy. Obama people think that if we keep taking money from the rich and live off of welfare and work for the government they think money will never run out but eventually the rich join the poor because there is no longer an incentive to be rich now where does the Government get its money now. Both societies dont work so lets start back to what does work and that is capitalism and lets make it as pure as possible.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:23pmHave you taken a look at the book of Mormon there is communism written all over it and you can also take a look at who he associates with and what he did as governor.
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:37pmReally Book of Mormon is now the communist manefesto your a moron. Republicans are communist conservatives are communist unless you are a Ron Paul supporter you are a communist. Utah a highly Mormon state has some of the most conservative policies in America and is the most Red state in the United states when I say red I dont mean communist. So your logic again is wrong.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:13pmn8isgrate
Report Post »Ron Paul is the Closest thing to the Founding Fathers since at the very least Goldwater. You don’t know poop from applesauce about Dr. Paul , The Constitution, Mormons, Foreign Policy etc. In fact what are you educated in? Talking points? Try stating some facts with some data to back it up and someone here may take you seriously.
American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:40amThe point of the non-interventionalist policy is not that if we play nice with the middle east and they’ll like us. It‘s that if we don’t antagonize them, they have plenty of grudges and enemies within their region that if we didn’t bother them, they’d just fight among themselves. By antagonizing them, or siding with one or the other, puts us in their cross hairs or brings them together against a common enemy. Screw the middle east, let them fight among themselves. If they attack, then level their country so they don’t have the capacity to strike again. Nation building doesn’t fix anything. At one point, Republicans were actually AGAINST that sort of thing….
And they call us Liberals?
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 2:52amn8isgrate
Those statements are opinions of your on me and mine were opinions on people who like Ron Paul not necessarily Ron Paul himself who I actually do like but wouldn’t vote for him due to his foreign policy. I hear the same talking points from Ron Paul people anybody who doesn’t like Ron Paul= neocon, communist, progressive. So you state I am not educated well not by youtube like all the Ron Paul people who watch all the conspiricy theories created on the bildibergs and rothchilds and how they pick our candidates and control everything blah blah blah. You don’t know about mormons I actually am one so I think I would know a little more than you and there is no evidence that mormons are communists whatsoever they one of the most conservative group of people in the United States 80 percent of Utah vote Republican you may not like Republicans but they are not communist. I don’t like everything the Republicans do but I vote republican to make sure to get conservative tax policy, conservative judges, and less regulation. Libertarians require full on revolution to get what they want. Why not vote Romney now and 4 years vote for who ever you think is better we just need to get Obama out of office Romney is not even close to Obama and you thinking he is shows how ignorant and brainwashed you are by Alex Jones or any other Ron Paul lover host.
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 2:56am@AMERICAN SOLDIER (SEPARATED)
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 12:40am
The point of the non-interventionalist policy is not that if we play nice with the middle east and they’ll like us. It‘s that if we don’t antagonize them, they have plenty of grudges and enemies within their region that if we didn’t bother them, they’d just fight among themselves.
To me that is very naive to think if we play nice they will play nice back there is no evidence to support that will actually work. They will hate us no matter what we do they want the world covered with Islam they hate christians and jews and want to destroy them. They hate us because we support Israel and for Ron Paul to really get on their good side he would have to denounce Israel and let palestine take over he doesn’t want that from what I know so in the end his foreign policy will never ever work. Case closed think for once in your life.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 6:14am@N8… Case closed? Yeah right… All you’ve done is parrot what the lying-ass media says and then tell us to THINK. You‘ve swallowed the media’s propaganda hook, line and sinker. You talk about what the Muslims want to do to Christians and Jews, but ignore the “just war” theory of Christianity. Furthermore, you‘re arguing with two guys who were over there telling us that we don’t know what’s going on over there.
Report Post »jgad22
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:17pmScrew fox news and their snarky little comments, newt suspends his campaign, gives them what they want, and they still tear him apart. I’m a hardcore conservative, but sometimes fox makes me sick.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on May 3, 2012 at 5:52amDitto
Report Post »trueamerican40
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:15pmI like Newt. I also agree with a comment here about him being the new Secretary of State. He would be awesome at it.
Report Post »perchhound
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:48pmFox has it right, Newt can’t even pay his campain bills. This is who we have to chose from……
Report Post »ImMormon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:33pmNewt had some good ideas, but they were grossly eclipsed by his huge ego! I would not want someone with a volatile ego such as Newt’s as the secretary of state… though, I would take him over Hillary Rotten Clinton.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:13pmOK All of You who were saying Newt ,Rick, Ron need to get Out.
Report Post »You got your Wish Now all We‘re going to hear for the next 6 Month’s
is News Stories for Barack Obama.The Blaze has about 6
right now.
Nothing about Mitt Romney except one where He’s Praising Obama for
getting Osama Bin Laden an saying He whould have done the Same.
This is going to Work out so Well for the Republicans.
As long as there was a race for the Nomination Republicans got all
the News coverage Now they can’t even get a story on FOX .
Screwy Louie an Dan Savage (the Queer) get more Press than Mitt.
Tell Me Again how this is Good for the Party ?
The only time anyone talks about Mitt is
Guessing Who his VP pick will be.
Mitt Romney will get my Vote in Nov. because at least He’s not
A Communist.
But the TEA Party an Conservatives in General
soon after Jan of 2013 need to start a 3rd Party to challenge
Romney in 2016 because it‘s clear that the Republicans Don’t
Want them in the GOP they just want their votes.
Elect Mitt Romney in 2012 to save the Republic
Then Start the Conservative Party to actually CUT Spending
and Taxes in 2016.
Run Sarah Run
We can’t wait till 2020 for a Conservative in
The White House.
Thanks Newt for Trying
Johnny Cocheroo
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:37pmFlipper –
Dog bite you once…. dumb dog
Dog bite you twice….
I swear I heard the same thing about a better candidate after McCain….. Deja Vu anyone?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:41pm@flipper
i wish you were right but it aint gonna happen. if republicans get president, they will only be interested in keeping their power. They will do everything they can to prevent the constitution element of the party. Romney would have NO challengers in 2016 – that is wishful thinking
i know where this is headed and i will only vote for people worth voting for
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:21pm@ Soybomb315
Report Post »I was not calling for a challange in the GOP
I’m Asking for the Conservatives, Constitutionalist,an
TEA Party to form a 3rd Party an challange the GOP.
in 2016.
Although it probably wont happen because if Mitt Wins
He will put some of his former Rivals in his Cabinet.
To insure their loyalty
That would be like Hillary Running against Obama This year.
He bought her loyalty with the Sec.of State Position.
I Hate to sound so cynical but I Don’t Trust Most Politicians.
Ronald Reagan an Sarah Palin being the only 2 exceptions.
dalebrendan
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:10pmI REALLY would have loved to see a Newt/Obama debate. It would have been one of the best all-time smack downs in US political history.
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 8:11pmtoo bad he lost in the debate to romney when he was fired by romney for supporting a base on the moon. Romney will destroy Obama himself in debates he was very solid in every single debate.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:34pmDalebrendan
“I REALLY would have loved to see a Newt/Obama debate.”
Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38
Report Post »pap pap
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:02pmI was glad Newt was in the race. He brought a lot of ideas that others should pick up on. He sure could debate. I would have loved seeing him crush Obama in a debate.
Report Post »RANGER1965
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:00pmDespite his faults, and yes..they were many. Gingrich is at heart, an idea man. And some of them were awesome!
He wanted to completely take apart our State Department brick by brick, and put it together in a way that would serve our interests in a constitutional way, rather than it being a haven for liberal thought. I think Mitt Romney could do alot worse than having Newt as his Secretary of State.
RANGER
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:05pmtrue , but that whole bilderburg and bohemian grove thing freaks me out…
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 9:42pmI don’t trust any CFR members.
Report Post »MittensKittens
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:51pmNow it’s time to rally the troops…I am surprised that Santorum said he will not support Romney. Dumba$$ should put his money where his mouth was 2 months ago and get behind the candidate now.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:50pmThe guy did better than I expected, I’ll give him that.
Time for all conservatives, republicans, libertarians, independents, and yes – even democrats to rally behind Romney to beat Obama in 2012!
Romney/______ 2012!
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:07pmWe’d have a better chance against 0bama if Romney would shut up about what a wonderful guy 0bama is. He is turning people away with his moderate BS.
0bama is NOT a nice guy and he’s certainly not a hero for giving the OK to kill Bin Laden.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:40pmRomney = Obama. hell no
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:47pmQP, he does this because they are cut from the same mold. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38&feature=youtu.be
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:49pmP8triot, is not going to happen, sorry. Romney will not get hardly any Dem votes, youth vote, Paul supporter votes and will only get a handful of Independent votes. Romney will lose to Obama.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:24pmRomney hasnt won yet. He doesnt even have as many delegates as the media says.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 5:25pmOkay, I knew it was wishful thinking to presume that Libertarians would get behind anyone besides Ron Paul… but might as well try – right? :)
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:31pmnot true Gary Johnson would be fine anybody that wants to bring us back to the constitution and very little goverment. Not a big goverment person Obama with an R.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 9:39pmNo Libertarian is going to vote for a man who thinks it’s OK for Union thugs to grope their wives and children, spy on innocent Americans, indefinitely detain, torture or kill Americans or take away our 2nd ammendment rights. Demint gets it, the rest of the GOP had better wake up too.
Report Post »Seagal45
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:47pmAbout time! Good riddance.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:44pmThey hate him because he had a tangible message. Gingrich represents the medicine that had the potential to fix the disease in D.C.
People don’t like medicine, they’d rather just cover up the symptoms and live in denial.
You can deny reality, but you can’t deny the consequences of reality.
And what does the media do?, they give more importance to some dumbass NFL player who shot himself because that’s what the country feels is more important.
This country DESERVES to get flushed.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:56pmPersonally, I believe this country is the greatest country in the world and DESERVES to be restored to its fullest glory.
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:41pmYour campaign ended three months ago Newtie. Mmmm moonbases.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:58pmMoon bases are better than soup kitchens and food stamps and that’s what Barry has in mind.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:39pmFinally…now it’s time to get behind Romney.
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:52pmsorry , that dog don’t hunt.
just cannot see the difference…to many flips and questions.
has to be some way we can come together on this..?
yes , im for paul .
i want smalll govt , more freedom.
self control, no police state and the right to arm bears.
no victim , no crime kinda thing.
you?
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:13pmSo you don’t mind giving Obama four more years to do more harm to the country RAZLORD?
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:46pmsorry lost internet…
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:48pmexcuse me , who supports ndaa, war powers and more bs wars…romney.
get your facts right or …you know the rest.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 10:46pmReally… What would be the first thing Romney did if elected? LIE!!
Report Post »zzanggu33
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:38pmGood thing he clarified he is not suspending citizenship…like all those guys in the past that have suspended citizenship when the suspended prez campaigns…
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:37pmtime for all to get behind the true conservative liberty candidate Ron Paul
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:29pmRomney = Obama
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:35pmYay nobody will miss him Ron Paul 2012 or Gary Johnson 2012 or state and local elections to nullify the federal goverment and secede from union perhaps.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:52pmAll of the above = 4 more for Obama. I didn‘t vote for Romney and he’s not the conservative I want, but damn it, he’s better than Obama! If he gets four more this country is toast. Vote for whoever you want in the primary, but vote Romney in the general. A vote for Paul or Johnson is a vote for Obama and you know it.
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:04pmnobody is going to be elected if we keep cutting each others throats…
need to work something out or we are all toast.
ideas …anyone?
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:32pmRomney is more to the left than Obama actually and Obama would be better than Romney because it would help advance the cause for liberty and make people realize big goverment isn’t the answer giving Rand Paul a good chance in 2016 or some other liberty candidate. Maybe a financial collapse is what is needed to wake people up for good.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:39pmRomney is the same-thing as Obama as obama was the same thing as Bush.
Report Post »n8isgrate
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 7:47pmI contend these Paul bots are part of the Obama Re election payroll to try to divide our party. They would never vote for a republican in the first place so why listen to their crap.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 8:13pmThe party is divided that is why he will lose to Obama he cannot reunite the party being a big goverment guy like he is, we alone make up a quarter of the party and the 1/3 of party are value voters who can’t stand him. we don’t like Obama but we know Romney is no better its the same agenda.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:34pmWell than makes it 7 times in a row with a PROGRESSIVE President, don’t think freedom will survive.
Report Post »perchhound
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:34pm3 million in debt….How can we trust Any of these people..
p.s. first post
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:48pmDid it hurt?
Report Post »perchhound
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 3:57pmno, thanks
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:11pmActually, I’ve read that he “finished March with $4.3 million in debts, an alarming increase from $1.5 million at the end of February, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission.”
http://news.yahoo.com/newt-gingrich-4-million-debt-staffers-creditors-fume-002208567–abc-news-topstories.html
This guy never should have even ran for office.
Report Post »Johnny Cocheroo
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 4:31pmSo Perch……
Who you rooting for?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:07pmperch
16 trillion in debt to boot. cant trust any of them – especially the ones that have the good looks and smooth delivery
Report Post »