Politics
Gingrich Now Reportedly to End Presidential Bid on Wednesday
- Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:06am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
Newt Gingrich will now end his campaign for president on Wednesday, according to CNN, despite initial reports the former House Speaker would suspend his bid on Tuesday.
A senior campaign staffer had said Gingrich would “more than likely” endorse Mitt Romney when he drops out. The two spoke by phone last week, a Gingrich spokesman told CNN.
Gingrich previously said he would remain in the presidential race until the GOP convention in August. Despite a surge in late 2011, he failed to capture any real momentum once primary season began.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (115)
Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:20pmRon Paul wins Louisiana
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03q1mCVLltc
soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:37pmi’m afraid it is too late. the republican establishment was able to crown mitt romney right before these state conventions got underway
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:56pmguess will be chaos then…
Report Post »all ready?
soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:57pmnot sure what you mean
i am ready for the wheels of socialism to tear this economy apart, so yes i am ready for a little political tussle
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 2:20pmby ‘ready’ i mean prepared
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 2:48pmsame.
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 2:50pmtho, i am not ready for a little political tussle…
Report Post »i am ready for a revolution…as in hanging the corrupt worthless bastids…
soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 3:00pmthe revolution of ideas is underway. its too bad the republican party isnt behind us like the democrat party is behind the socialists
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 3:07pmsad.but true.
repub/dem no difference.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 4:20pmDoes this little conversation mean that we have the Republican convention to set off our anarchist crowd ? Is this where are little hoodie dudes plan to make an appearance ? Not the Democrat Convention ? Not the May 1 fun ? Or do you plan to do all three..if you aren’t in jail ? Curious minds want to know. Oh, and please do NOT associate yourself with conservatives. We believe in the rule of law. Not in anarchy. You sound like escapees from the OWS Crowd. You seem to share their values..or lack thereof…
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 4:46pmlmao Barber… If you all love the rule of law why do you support candidates who don’t follow it?
Report Post »ozz
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 5:14pm@barber2 And when they pass a law repealing the bill of rights……are you still down with that?
When they pass a law ordering you to the camps and then the gas chamber………how about that?
Ron Paul seeks to bring us back as close to the constitution as possible more than any president has in over 100 years. How exactly do you get more conservative than that?
Report Post »But you would actually have to read his platform to know that. It is so much easier to be spoon fed by the lying heads. You know…….the ones that have said nothing about the last FIVE states he has won. The ones that claimed everyone won Iowa but Paul……..yeah he won Iowa (most delegates).
You go ahead and live you life like a mushroom (left in the dark and fed $h!7).
“As for me give me liberty or give me death.”
dollar341
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:43pmI got elected as a Louisiana Delegate Saturday! Pretty Cool. And nobody is reporting that Ron Paul took the STATE OF LOUISIANA. How cool is that! I guess The Blaze is in the tank for Romney too! Just listened to the first half hour of the GB radio show from Friday and there they were shilling for Romney! Talking about how he sounds so Reaganesque. Glen, Glen, Glen. Reads the books, writes the books, connects the dots and still doesn’t get it! It’s all about having the right fool sitting in the White House when they crash the dollar. Obama and Romney are interchangeable shills in this respect. The last guy they want in the Oval Office when the Dollar self destructs is Ron Paul, he would know exactly what to do and they just can’t have that now can they.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:30pmLook, do not count Paul out yet. Victory in Alaska, Wins Louisiana, Sweeping in Massachusetts and preparing for a takeover in Nevada. All these things are good news for Paul. Romney does not have the 840 some delegates as the MSM reports. Paul has more than the 79 they report. Paul is set to pick up the majority in several caucus states yet. We still have a ways to go and we still could be looking at a brokered convention. If we have that, all bets are off the table. I know a lot of you do not like that scenario, but anything is possible at this point. To see how the delegate system works, because it matters not if you win the straw poll in these caucus states, watch this video from a Fox affiliate: http://www.fox19.com/story/17768724/reality-check-infighting-at-more-gop-caucuses-and-what-the-msm-wont-tell-you-about-iowa-and-minnesota
There are Paul supporters in the ranks of the bound delegates for Romney, they have to cast for Romney first vote at the convention, if Romney does not get 1144 at the first vote, the delegates are free to vote for anyone. At that poiint, I believe Paul will get over 1144 on the second round. That is just the way it is.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:14pmWell…….I guess that leaves us with this then:
—————————
Mitt Romney – “I like mandates. The mandates work.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhx8e9j7r0w
A Republican and an Democrat that both support the individual mandate……
Who woulda’ thunk it?
Report Post »Saltygi
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:47pmNot voting for Romney ensures Obama win. And the choice is ????
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:51pmvote your conscience
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 12:27pm“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.” John Quincy Adams
Decide now, Ron Paul or another 4 years of Obama. What’s it going to be?
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:42amRomney vs Paul now. A liberal vs a constitutionalist. Poll after poll shows that Paul does better against Obama than Romney does. A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama!
Report Post »Naps
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:12amRon Paul is gonna P!SS in Romney’s cheerios when he keeps him from getting 1144him delegates. Brokered Convention Here We Come!
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012
Churchill
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:37amRomney has already started moving towards the left now he thinks he’s got the republican nomination in the bag. Romney can’t be trusted.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:07pmromney has been crowned the nominee without ever having to embrace constitution or tea party ideas. game over for constitutional conservatives
Report Post »stang289
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:45amOff Topic but important : Reduction in air pollution from coal fired power stations due to environmental regulations since the 1980s has increased regional global warming in the Central and Eastern United States. Climate scientists from the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) found that particulate pollution, particularly from coal fired power stations, caused a global warming hole, or a large cold patch reducing temperatures by up to 1 degree C in the region, particularly lowering maximum temperatures in Summer and Autumn.
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:31pmthanks for the info…
Report Post »WTSpike
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:21amAnd so ends the campaign of the only candidate who brought forth real ideas, real solutions, and real intellect to an election cycle that desperately needed someone who could actually make a difference. We needed wine, and again we settled for Welchade. We needed steak, and we settled for hamburger. Gingrich has my gratitude for at least trying to make real change. Romney now has my full support, but my hopes are not high that he’ll make any real difference.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:46amThe Constitution was a good idea. Moon colonies when we’re 16 trillion in the hole… not so much. The GOVERNMENT can’t fix anything EVER!!!
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:53amright……..because the first thing that comes to mind when i think of real ideas and real solutions is a moon colony
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:56am@just
“The GOVERNMENT can’t fix anything EVER!!!”
Your correct, but then you want us to believe that Ron Paul (Career Government) is the only one who can fix EVERYTHING.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:31amLike you said, he has 30 years. 30 years of votes you can look at. Take a chance and look.
Report Post »Captain77
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:42am@therealconservative Ron Paul wasn’t simply a career politician, but also a Doctor who owned his own business and delivered over 4,000 babies without ever doing one abortion procedure. Also, he’s a constitutional scholar who understands it so well, even Romney defers to him in debates over constitutional issues. Ya, Ron Paul has the answers for this nations ill simply because he knows the constitution. RON PAUL 2012
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:45am@therealfake
Ron Paul,
As a junior in High School, he was the 220-yard dash State Champion. After High School Paul when on to earned a Doctor of Medicine degree from Duke University‘s School of Medicine. Relocating with his wife to Michigan, Dr. Paul completed his medical internship at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit. He then served as a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force and in the United States Air National Guard, making him the only Veteran running for President. After serving his country, he became an OB/GYN and began his own private practice delivering over 4000 babies. In between this. Dr Paul has been a renowned defender of the Constitution and served 12 terms as Congressman for the Texas’s 14th congressional district.
Ron Paul:
*Medical Doctor
Report Post »*Veteran
*OB/GYN
*Small Business Owner
*Congressman
*Defender of The Constitution
therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 12:15pm@capt
We’ve heard the story before “Paul delivered babies”. That doesn’t change that he is a career politician and a pacifist who would sell the country out faster than Obama, just to avoid any ‘conflict’. Way to support the country and Constitution
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 12:18pm@recover
You left off
career Politician
Report Post »Pacifist
dissentnow
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 12:39pm@Thereal
“pacifist who would sell the country out faster than Obama, just to avoid any ‘conflict’”
He voted to give the president the authority to get Bin Laden after 9/11 and proposed a letter of marque and reprisal to kill members of Al Qaeda. He did the same for the Somali pirates.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:52pm@diss
Everyone know that he voted to go to Afgan, becuase it would have ruined his political career if he voted againist it. And I just know that Al Qaeda and the Somali pirates would have surrendered at the thought of a letter of marque and reprisal.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 2:15pmThe letter of marque and reprisal is used to KILL, not to scare. It was the republicans and the democrats that worked together to go to war with Iraq, a country that didn’t attack us, instead of killing the people who really did attack us. It was Ron Paul who proposed killing those who attacked us on 9/11. It was the republicans and the democrats, working together, that helped further our national debt by getting us involved in a war against a country that didn’t attack us.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 2:51pm@dis
“It was Ron Paul who proposed killing those who attacked us on 9/11″
Actually, that was Pres. Bush. Remember Ron Paul was the one all upset when the U.S. killed Osama Bin Laden and Ahmed Hijazil
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 3:02pm@Dis
Forgot that Paul had a fit when Al-Awlaki was killed
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 3:15pmi dont like when the president assinates american citizens either
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 3:31pm@soy
Al-Awlaki and Ahmed Hijazil were terrorist dedicated to the destruction of the U.S., they forfited their right of citizenship long ago.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 3:47pmnobody forfeits constitutional rights – every american citizen retains rights (because they are human and a child of God). yours is the attitude of a dictator
when the next socialist president starts ‘eliminating’ threats to the government (ie: critizing the government), where will you be?
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 4:36pm@soy
So you think that U.S. citizens who become terroists, disavowing the U.S. and the Constitution, planned the murder of Americans and dedicated their lives to the destruction of the U.S. still have rights. Ron Paul and his pacifist followers, such as yourself, would sell this country out to our enemies faster than Obama has already done.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 4:50pmi feel bad for you
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 4:55pmWow… Do you realize that you’re arguing that Obama (a man you have NO TRUST in) should have the right to be judge, jury and executioner of American citizens, based on allegations? Where do you draw the line? Oh and I take it, you‘re not going to look at RP’s 30 year voting record.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 4:59pm@the real
Report Post »“Actually, that was Pres. Bush”
Neither Iraq nor Afgahnistan attacked us on 9/11. Paul was the one who said lets kill Al Qaeda; not Bush. Bush/Chenney lead us into a pointless war in Iraq that cost us billions of dollars and nearly 5,000 service men and women.
Al-awlaki was an American citizen and, as such, he was afforded due process under the constitution. It doesn’t matter how evil he was. We are all innocent until proven guilty. Allowing the president to assassinate American citizens without due process sets a horrible legal precedent that might be, one day, used against people who speak out against the government or a particular administration. Being a knee-jerk neo-con, you wont understand the implications until it is too late.
therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 5:48pm@dis
Sorry to bust your illusion of Paul, but Pres. Bush had made that call on day one. Also where was Al Qaeda leadership located on 9/11, in Afgahnistan. Also after the Taliban lost control of Afgahnistan, many Al Qaeda members fled to Iraq. Among them was Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who became the Al Qaeda leader in Iraq.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 5:56pm@dis
Maybe you can tell the families of the sailors who died on the USS Cole how, Ahmed Hijazil should have been given his constitutional rights.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 6:35pm@just
“based on allegations?”
Osama Bin Laden – Leader of Al Qaeda, ordered 9/11 attacks.
Al-Awlaki – Recruiter for Al Qaeda. Gave spiritual ‘advice’ to Mohammond Atta and two other 9/11 terrorists. He was also the individual that Maj. Hasan was e-mailing with prior to the Ft. Hood attack.
Ahmed Hijazil – Planner of the USS Cole attack.
Where do I draw the line? I don’t believe in giving terrorist a pass, reguardless of where they were born.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 6:48pmYou’re a lost soul man.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 7:00pm@just
Sorry, but I refuse to kneel at the altar of Ron Paul. I choose to live in the real world, maybe sameday the Paul “Followers” will also.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 7:21pmI have no illusions for you to bust. You said that Paul was a pacifist. I offered proof that you are wrong.
a) he voted to give the president the authority to take out Al-Qaeda in Afgahnistan
b) he put forward a letter of marque and reprisial to kill members of Al-Qaeda
c) he put forward a letter of marque and reprisial to kill Somali pirates.
Someone who proposes a means to kill can NOT, by definition, be a pacifist.
If you have a problem with due process, do NOT ever call yourself a constitutionalist. You are either a constitutionalist or you are not, and YOU are not a constitutionalist. Sometimes in defending the constitution, you must take the unpopular side of an issue. Freedom isn’t always pretty. You must be willing to defend the freedoms that you agree with AND the freedoms that you don’t agree with. If you deny one person their due process you are setting a precedent for a future administration to deny others of their due process.
Report Post »DaveOregon
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:10pmAgree – the best man is down and we are left with “flipper” – a 2nd rate knock off of Obummer the “rubberband” man. As for moon colonies – jeezus – the man has a vision – we can do it – do you have any clue as to ALL the innovations and gadgest that came out of NASA from the space program? It was a suggestion – at least Gingrich has ideas and will allow the States to try things out before the stupid Fed’s just make a blanket rule that “one size fits all” mentality that got the Soviets “shvim weqar (remember those ad’s? They had a point). Note that some of the left stream media is beginning to “question” some of the Feds’ like Bernecke and Geitner, etc. Know why? – Because Spain is about to go the way of Greece – and then the EU is in full financial collapse and it will be WORSE for the US then the supposed financial crisis in 2008. So – the powers that be in the Socialist/marxist “weekend commies” that own NBC, ABC, CBS, etc – have to look like they were not the problem – that they were on top of it and calling Obummer on it – because when the real depression comes – there will be rioting in the streets and they don;t want the rioters coming for their head s too. Course – too late – but they are beginning the CYA mode. Funny actually.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:28pm@Dave
Report Post »How do we pay for the moon colony?
Also, didn’t Newt support the individual mandate?
therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:33pm@dis
“I offered proof that you are wrong.”
No, you offered your opinon on what you think is the truth, as provided to you by Ron Paul.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:57pm@Thereal
No, i gave you facts…..you just don‘t like them because they don’t fit your agenda. Are you saying that he didn’t vote to give the president the authority to get Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan? Are you saying that he didn’t propose a letter of marque and reprisal? Are you really saying that? Unlike you, i am not blinded by party loyalty.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:46pm@Real, Don’t bow to the altar of Paul. None of us really are, despite the misperception. But you are arguing that the ends justify the means, and that usually ends badly.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 11:21amI think it’s best if we just let “therealflake” comment, and don’t responded to it. He reminds me a lot of Time aka yepimaConservative. example:
therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:56am
@just
“The GOVERNMENT can’t fix anything EVER!!!”
Your correct, but then you want us to believe that Ron Paul (Career Government) is the only one who can fix EVERYTHING.
In response
recoveringneocon
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:45am
@therealfake
Ron Paul,
As a junior in High School, he was the 220-yard dash State Champion. After High School Paul when on to earned a Doctor of Medicine degree from Duke University‘s School of Medicine. Relocating with his wife to Michigan, Dr. Paul completed his medical internship at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit. He then served as a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force and in the United States Air National Guard, making him the only Veteran running for President. After serving his country, he became an OB/GYN and began his own private practice delivering over 4000 babies. In between this. Dr Paul has been a renowned defender of the Constitution and served 12 terms as Congressman for the Texas’s 14th congressional district.
Ron Paul:
*Medical Doctor
*Veteran
*OB/GYN
*Small Business Owner
*Congressman
*Defender of The Constitution
and it’s response
therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 12:18pm
@recover
You left off
career Politician
What is the point? Did it even read
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 11:25amIt must have not even read the comment or is just to ignorant to comprehend . Lets just try ignoring it.
Report Post »llotus
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:03amI always thought that his reason for staying in was to help Romney. He made racket like he was helping Santorum……..but look at what the results are. He had a job to do and he got it done. He may even end up being vp or something else he realy wouldnt be good for. He needs to retire and get out. He manipulated the process. He pulled a roper doper. Lotus.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:34amThat leaves Ron Paul as the only “Anti-Romney” left.
Ron Paul suppoters aren’t going anywhere, and I, for one, refuse to vote for Romney. I’ll write in Ron Paul, if I must.
See here.
Actually, Ron Paul Is Secretly Winning A Lot More Delegates Than You Think
http://www.businessinsider.com/ron-paul-winning-delegates-missouri-minnesota-colorado-washington-2012-4
And here.
Ron Paul Wins Louisiana!
http://www.dailypaul.com/229567/ron-paul-wins-louisiana
Romney is a Corporatist, guys. He is not for the free market. He pays lip service to it, but holds similar views about the economy as Obama.
See here.
Mitt Romney Open To Value Added Tax (VAT) !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsMIa6E_KUk
And here.
Romney supports automatic hikes in minimum wage
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/01/romney-supports-automatic-hikes-in-minimum-wage/
And here.
Romney Obama the Same?
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38
Mr. Oshawott
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:46amWell, with Newt Gingrich’s campaign nearing its end, the primary race is now between Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, in which we now have a clearer choice between a candidate that’ll allow himself to be beholden to big banks and giant corporations or a candidate that will take the oath of abiding by the Constitution seriously and put an end to the wars that have been erasing the lives of U.S. soldiers and civilians of foreign countries for over a decade.
Report Post »justafollower
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:40amAfter showing his ugly mug at the White House Correspondents Dinner and sitting through that disgraceful sham of a speech by the president, he damn well should. Gingrich lost every shred of respect and benefit of the doubt I would have given him. Straight up loser! Go back to lobbying!
Report Post »Oldphoto678
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:39amWell, looks like you’re stuck with Willard. I guess if the tea party had any real power there would be a CONservative running against President Obama.
Report Post »Simonne
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:30amNewt was actually a lobbyist for Fanny although he called it by another name.
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:19pmIt’s funny, but without tea party voters, Romney wouldn’t be where he is now, I keep wondering why you very few Paul supporters don’t get that.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:35amA vote for Romney is a vote for Obama, hes no different what so ever.
Report Post »hillplus
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 12:46pmFoolish statement not based on reason or fact.
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 1:26pmMittvMitt.com: The story of two men trapped in one body
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9njHHyRI7g
same big corp backers as barry, bush , clinton etc…
now…your proof?
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:29amNewt Gingrich he would have been better than boring robot romney who is boring and will lose to obama but he still would expand goverment and financially collapse the country so goodbye, have fun writing books.
Report Post »Simonne
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:31amNewt had no chance to beat Obama but Mitt does. Will he do it, it will be a tough fight. They don’t want voter ID for nothing.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:49amWell here is why i think Mitt Romney will lose, not because Obama is super strong but because the Republican party is so divided and many folks cannot stand Romney, to much of the party, lets say you have 20-25% party are Libertarians aka Paul Supporters most of them will never vote for Romney because they see him as Obama which i think he is to. Also the Mormon thing is still an issue with value voters probably 30-40 percent of the party and 1/4 of the country in polls will not vote for one, some polls show 1/5-1/4 of gop is considering to back Obama over Romney. Romney is not a good candidate, he doesn’t connect with people, he can’t distinguish himself from Obama so many voters will just stay home and focus on other elections.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:27amNow for Mitt Romney to drop out, because he will lose to Obama because nobody likes him because hes boring and arrogant. for all the votes hes getting hes getting allot less delegates to match up for it. If some bs happens and Romney gets nomination ignore presidential election and focus on the state and local elections, there more important anyways, states can nullify federal laws anyways and impact your lives daily., you could also focus on GOP take over of senate if you want.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:45amIf you want to vote in presidential election and Ron Paul is not on there you can vote libertarian and its likely a great candidate Gary Johnson will get the nomination, hes worth voting for, he has Paul’s positions and hes been a Governor and a Businessman better record the Rombot.
Report Post »WTSpike
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:25amSir, you live in a fantasy world of your own making. While Paul and Johnson have an admirable respect for the Constitution, neither has any chance of beating 0bama in the general election. The Libertarian Party simply does not have the backing or the money to compete. Unfortunately, a vote for either one only splits the conservative vote, guaranteeing the reelection of the worst President in modern history.
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:53amWhen they get a chance in the general election lets see Ron Paul has the young vote in the hands, he beats Obama in some general election polls, He appeals to minorities like Hispanics, Independents and Democrats like him some, Older folks would be happy with someone not trying to take away their entitlements, many folks like an anti war candidate and with Johnson add experience and social liberalism. all it takes is 15 percent to be on the national state and either of the 2 can reach that to boost themselves for a chance.
Report Post »Captain77
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 11:47am@WTSPIKE, you‘re showing your ignorance on the issue if you believe Ron Paul can’t beat Obama. Currently, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate beating Obama in the Polls, not Romney. But then, if you subscribe to main stream media and don’t do your own investigation, you probably wouldn’t realize that.
Report Post »TWO BITS
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:23amI hope Gingrich will endorse Romney. Newt was quick to defend Palin during the last election, and it was greatly appreciated. His stinging rebuttals of liberal talking points will be an asset until November…provided he doesn’t over do it.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:21amI was going to say ‘when is Ron Paul’ going to drop out, but I get a kick out reading the comments of his “FOLLOWERS”.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:33amhe was the only candidate who fights for anything – it makes sense he is the last one standing
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:58amYeah, being a follower of an honest individual fighting for freedom is much worse than being a follower of corrupted party who sends your brothers (if you’re legit) off to kill and die for…. what exactly again? Oh yeah the freedom that your beloved GOP keeps giving away to Obama.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:07ami told you guys for the last 2 months that gingrich was working for romney. once he realized he couldnt win it, his goal was to take away votes from santorum and make sure romney makes it through. if newt was serious all along, now would be the time that he refuses to get out (since he is the last ‘conservative’).
the whole primary was a joke
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:18amHe is in the CFR. Globalists do not want anyone in there who could mess up their plans of world domination.
Report Post »Razlord
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 3:13pmnewt also loves playing with the boys at tthe bohemian grove…
Report Post »Newt Gingrich, Bohemian Grove and media lies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jD6TJNflGk
disenlightened
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:02amI’ll miss Newt, but I‘ll miss Callista’s sacred golden helmet so much more. Callista has the hair every liberal male dreams of.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:37amnot me. those two together looked like a seaseme street number 10.
Report Post »Naps
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:16amCallista needs to go back to the lab on Jekyll Island where she was assembled.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:55amGood! More delegates for Ron Paul.
If anyone thinks I’m voting for either Romney or Obama, they are out of their frickin’ minds.
I am voting my conscience. The best man for the job is Ron Paul. Period. End of story.
Whine to your mothers you big babies. Next time you might try endorsing a candidate with principles.
Report Post »The Eleventh Doctor
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:06amI agree I’d like Ron Paul over Romney or Obama, but I think we’re gonna have to hold our noses and vote for Romney for the sake of trying to get Obama out. Romney’s a terrible candidate, but if we divide the Republican vote, we’re bound to lose.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:13amIf you cast a write-in vote for Ron Paul, you WILL be voting for 0bama. You can spout things like “principles”, “vote my conscience” and all the other typical hand-fed Paulbot sound bites but the fact is, if your vote helps 0bama, you’ll be voting for 0bama.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:19amromney has divided the republican vote. therefore i blame the establishment since they are the ones that catapulted his campaign
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:25am@The Eleventh Doctor
The Paulbots don’t think 0bama is any worse than Romney. If they can’t have Ron Paul, they couldn’t care less if 0bama gets reelected.
Good luck with trying to have a sensible conversation with them.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:02amOk Willy, Let’s be sensible… What IS the difference?
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 12:11pm@qpwillie
Bachmann
Cain
Santorum
Newt
The only one left to disappoint you is Romney. Must eat you up inside seeing the dedication and loyalty of the Paul Campaign. You know its not to late to be on the side of Freedom and Liberty. Crow is really not as bad as you think.
“May Future Generations Look Back On Our Work And Say That These Were Men And Women Who, In A Moment Of Great Crisis, Stood Up To Their Politicians, The Opinion-makers, and the Establishment, and Saved Their Country” -Ron Paul
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:37amIt’s between Mittshake and Muttburger now.
Report Post »Like Theodore Bikel said in 200 Motels; HOT DOG broth or hot DOG broth. Which do you choose ?
RJJinGadsden
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:37amAs big of a disappointment as Newt has turned out to be and I am happy to see him go. But, for the fun of it I would love to see him debate 0bama. With an army of typists the WH staff could not keep up with the teleprompter.
Report Post »countryfirst
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:35amWell it very simple now, Romney 2012 “at least he’s not a communist”
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:21am“yet”
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 10:01amWhat exactly is the difference between a communist and a “progressive-conservative”?
Report Post »NewBee
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:34amIt would have been nice if he got out and we could have Rick Santorium what a jerk thanks Newt!
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 9:21amthat was his plan all along. now that santorum is out, newt has no incentive to stay in
all those people who voted newt were fools
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:16amYa. There’s an all-you-can eat chicken buffet at the hotel where he‘s staying on Tuesday night and he doesn’t want to miss it for some silly press conference.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on April 29, 2012 at 8:14amOkay, as long as he doesn’t push it all the way back to Thursday. That would be unacceptable!
Report Post »