Environment

Gingrich Says He’s Scrapping Climate Change Chapter From Upcoming Book

GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich said Thursday he’s axing a chapter on climate change from his forthcoming book — though the intended author of the section said that was news to her, according to National Journal.

The Los Angeles Times reported earlier this month the book will more or less be a sequel to the former House Speaker’s 2007 book, “A Contract with the Earth,“ describing it as a ”collection of essays by various businesspeople and scientists.” The Times said it would include a chapter on climate change by Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech who has said there is “no debate” about the reality of climate change and “the fact that humans are the primary cause.”

A woman expressed concern to Gingrich about the chapter during an Iowa campaign stop Thursday, saying she’d heard Rush Limbaugh talking about it on his radio program.

“That’s not going to be in the book,” Gingrich said to her in a video of the exchange. “We didn’t know that they were doing that — we told them to kill it.”

After the woman stepped away, Gingrich beckoned to a staffer and said, “Remind me when we get back to the bus about Rush and global warming.”

Watch the exchange below, via National Review:

National Journal had Hayhoe’s reaction to the news:

Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech, confirmed in an e-mail interview that she had been asked to write a chapter on climate change for the former House speaker’s book. She said she was approached by former Palm Beach Zoo CEO Terry Maple, Gingrich’s coeditor, at an annual meeting of Republicans for Environmental Protection. Asked to confirm her chapter was dropped, she replied, “I had not heard that.”

Limbaugh had hit out at Hayhoe on his Dec. 19 program, saying she would be contributing to Gingrich’s book and calling her “one of Newt’s experts” who believes in man-made global warming.

In 2008, Gingrich appeared in a now-infamous ad with then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying the two agree “our country must take action to address climate change.“ He has since called it ”the dumbest single thing I’ve done” in recent years.

Comments (112)

1 2
  • nowhereman
    Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:14am

    Things are happening to the climate! Some of the changes are part of a natural cycle. However, I can‘t belief man hasn’t had a part in it. We have, just by interacting with the environment, effected the environment. Depending on the level of our interaction there are measured consequences. Earth systems were created by God to function certain ways, we have corrupted some of those with overuse and exploitation. We have not been good stewards.
    Climate change should be an important chapter of a book that’s, “more or less”, a sequel to one called “A Contract with the Earth.“

    Report Post » nowhereman  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:24am

      Actually only Republicans, Conservatives or other very bad people affect climate change. No DEMOCRATS,, Chinese, Indians, or any European or African have ever affected the climate as they feel so much about how the bad people (See Above) wreak havoc on the earth. Only Republicans poison water, pollute the air, contaminate the soil, air-raid villages or otherwise do tremendous damage to the earth.
      Is that what you really meant to say?? Al??? Al??? Is that You?? AL??

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • Detroit paperboy
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:22am

      Newt , you are the weekest link….. Goodbye.

      Report Post »  
    • tajloc
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:58am

      We are not good stewards??? I grew up in LA. It is nicer there now (smog wise). Now we just ship our messed up problems to the middle East. With new technology we can drill now and still have a beautiful earth. ALL our middle East problems would dim if we had our own energy…and it won’t be solar (I for one need light in the night).

      Report Post »  
    • nowhereman
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 1:44am

      Just saying we shouldn’t compromise our air and water for the sake of energy. The former we CAN’T live without, the latter we can learn to live with a little if we have to. Our population (313 mil) will double by the year 2050 so we need ALL we can come up with: clean coal, nuclear (not going to happen), natural gas, biomass, hydro, geothermal, solar thermal, PV, wind, and whatever else can be dreamed up.

      Report Post » nowhereman  
  • conservativewoman
    Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:10am

    Wow, now you’re attacking Mrs. Gingrich’s hair! How very bitchy and petty.

    Report Post » conservativewoman  
  • LovingAmerica
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:59pm

    Newt may as well keep the chapter in his book. It’s too late.

    Report Post »  
  • Maxim Crux
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:58pm

    Newts first thing on the agenda is signing a cap and trade treaty. Someone should see if he has made any money off the scheme thus far.

    Report Post »  
    • mamatango
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:41pm

      Hey Newt–Just do or say whatever seems most Politically Correct so you can get what you want from the voters–right? We’re onto you, Bud!

      And BTW, tell your people to quit calling my house! I have Caller ID, and never answer, and never will! I did think about answering this morning when I saw “Newt2012” on the ID. I considered telling your flunkies what I thought of voting for a lousy CFR member. Maybe they should know…

      Report Post »  
  • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:54pm

    Twisting, lying,pandering,flip flopping, decieving,backpedaling,crawfishing, whitewashing, ALL ON DISPLAY BY NEWT.

    Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
  • hauschild
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:41pm

    Seriously folks, we’ve got one of our top dogs hedging his bets so that he may remain relevant with the “in” crowd until his time passes. Our other top dog is no different. Our third dog is so thin-skinned that he cannot take even the slightest critical question without huffing and puffing and storming out of interviews….and I’m supposed to choose amongst these jokers???

    This country is toast.

    Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:48pm

      Your memory of events is seriously clouded…you need to exale and put down the lightbulb.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • KangarooJack
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:00pm

      Thats why this year, I’m gonna buy a generator. lol lol….acutally not really laughing here, not even a chuckle…frankly, getting depressed…Sheet! Sheet! that’s what I have to vote for. A choice between sheet and diarhhea .

      Report Post » KangarooJack  
  • Workforit
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:34pm

    That Gingrich, He is one smart Neocon, politician, Wall street buddy, FED supporting more of the same (just branded a little differently) kind of Republican candidate That would make both Bushes and Teddy Roosevelt proud! I really like the way he snuggles with Nancy Pelosi on the “green couch” !

    Ron Paul 2012!

    Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:08pm

      “That’s not going to be in the book,” Gingrich said to her in a video of the exchange. “We didn’t know that they were doing that — we told them to kill it.”

      After the woman stepped away, Gingrich beckoned to a staffer and said, “Remind me when we get back to the bus about Rush and global warming.”

      Rush Limbaugh may be a blowhard mouthpiece for the fringe right, but one thing he knows, and has expertice in given his high school education, is climate science. He’s the “go to” guy on science in any area, despite not having a college education, especially in either climate science or global warming. But he’s made a fortune supporting the 1% and opposing science if it speaks against corporation trading off human welfare in favor of profits.

      Rush says the climate isn’t changing, or if it is, it’s not due to human activity. Nuff said!

      Report Post » jzs  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:30am

      Actually Al Gore is your version of a Climate Expert?? Right? You know ,that great family man Al Gore . PHD in Climate Science> Didn’t he gradiate from East Anglia Univeristy , the Man_Made, Man-made Global Warming Statistics unerversity.??

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:53am

      JZS, get your head out of your a$$ and take some time to do some real research, if you are serious about finding the truth about GW, global warming, which is an utter hoax. Have done extensive research on the various proponents and opponents of GW. The opponents have it hands down both in their honesty, integrity, reliability of scientific data and were not paid to “cook the books”, nor hired with a definite agenda to come up with a certain result regardless of the true findings, which was not only the case with the United Nations “teams of experts”, but also with various American as well as British university teams hired through government grants to falsify or skew the results of the “scientific” research. Sad but profoundly true. I have a plethora of data showing such to be exactly the case. If you are going to comment in this arena, learn the facts or don’t show your ignorance by opening your mouth.

      Report Post »  
    • JustMeHere_01
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:18am

      @JVS

      You are quick to denounce anyone that disagrees with global warming it appears. I do have one question for you though. It seems that there is one person that has made millions of dollars on the prospect of global warming. That person is Al Gore who loves flying around the country preaching about this thing called global warming and warning everyone that we are doomed if nothing is done.

      I doubt that has anything to do with him selling carbon credits or anything like that. We all know that this thing called global warming has netted him millions and millions of dollars. Now, my thoughts are that if I had this much money and I really believed in what I was preaching to the rest of the world then I think I would have installed solar panels and a wind mill or two on my personal property and be completely independent of outside sources.

      If I believed in global warming and had the finances to do something about it then that is the first thing that I would have done. Has Al Gore done this. Not to my knowledge.

      So, JZS maybe you should be preaching your antics to Al Gore and not on this forum. Just my humble opinion.

      Report Post » JustMeHere_01  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 3:30am

      Al also bought a multi-million dollar house on the ocean. Kinda dumb if you ask me, if he really believes the oceans are going to start to rise and flood the entire east and west coast regions because of “Global Warming.” Why would anyone listen to someone that stupid.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • hypnos
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:05pm

      @jzs the jury is still out your climate change sham. You should realize hot topic sensationalism and the money it generates ie Al Gore and his faux science. Read Richard Lindzem MIT proff of climatology and watch cool it. It is more complex than you propose. Both these sources says the main reason to pursue this cause is mainly financial. Occupy that hypocrisy.

      Report Post » hypnos  
  • Zen Patriot
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:30pm

    Too little, too late loser, we’re already on to you.

    Report Post »  
    • conservativewoman
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:19am

      @ZEN PATRIOT
      “We?” I am voting for Newt Gingrich for President. Yes, read it again. I am voting for Newt Gingrich for President.
      After reading so many of the terrible, petty, mean-spirited posts from so many people on the Blaze forum about any little thing, just so they can bitch, I will make sure my choice is not associated in any way with theirs.

      Report Post » conservativewoman  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:24am

      @ Zen

      And that’s how its done folks. If you don‘t like someone’s conversation style, or brand of complaint, then by all means vote against whatever they are voting for. Surely picking the opposite of your pet peeve opponents is the healthiest and most logical way to make a decision.

      Hopefully there aren’t too many who think as pettily as you do. We can only hope. If you are going to vote for Gingrich, do so because you have studied his positions and find yourself in agreement with the most important issues he represents.

      I won’t vote for Newt, and not because those I find stupid are planning to vote for him. His political wit, though refreshing at first has become scary. I have seen and read too much to be able to put an ounce of trust in his candidacy.

      Report Post »  
    • Detroit paperboy
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:15am

      @jzs
      Hey bro, be nice, not everyone can major in liberal arts, with a minor in drama like you, and we all know how in demand your degree is…… I mean employers gotta be beatin your door down, lookin for… Uhhhh liberal artists… Uhhh who can dance to braodway showtunes …. You are the man !!!

      Report Post »  
  • sundance_sp
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:25pm

    I have to say, I have been watching and following Newt since the late 1980′s. I really liked him. I kind of saw him as the next Reagan in the future back then. He really seemed well principled, stuck to those principles and was very well spoken. I knew he had a good future in politics and would have followed him to the ends of the earth. Then came Clinton, well, while still being a huge Newt fan, I knew that his (along with other good Republicans) “Contract with America” was an ingenious idea. The country rallied behind him, and the “contract” and one control of the Senate for the first time in over 40 some odd years, which brought Clinton’s legacy to a screeching halt. Not entirely, but it did help in keeping Clinton from ushering in more socialism. The sad thing is, while the “Contract” was touted by the Republicans as being a huge success, it really wasn’t. Yes, the Republicans did live up to most of the “Contract”, some of the more important things were quietly swept under the rug… funny, it seems that nobody noticed. What really turned me off on Newt, was that after the so called “Contract”, Newt, who was being constantly bombarded with negative press, started to try and play the middle road. I will never forget it. I remember watching a news piece on TV where he was touted as being friendly with Clinton, public enemy number one at the time. After that, it seemed that not only he had issues of his own, but, he seemed to be only looking out for himself… s

    Report Post »  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:24pm

    Well, Mrs. Gingrich’s tin hair is bloody frightening.

    Report Post »  
  • KangarooJack
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:15pm

    Yep, I’m that old!
    Gee, I really DO remember Newt. {sigh}

    Report Post » KangarooJack  
  • c0mm0nsense
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:13pm

    Tron
    Its a custom Tinfoil hair hat. You have to sell a lot of books for a baby like that.

    Report Post » c0mm0nsense  
  • babylonvi
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:11pm

    Never be mistaken, Newt is and always has been a globalist Neocon, not a true conservative. He will move us toward cap & trade Globalist tyranny just as if he were a Progressive, all while spouting how he maintains constitutional values. You don’t get to be Speaker and not be in bed with the Globalist Elite.

    Report Post » babylonvi  
    • Dumbwhiteguy
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:39pm

      He‘s probably drank the goat’s blood with the bush’s. His wife looks like a high maint. zombie.

      Report Post »  
  • garyM
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:11pm

    Off Topic.
    Jon Huntsman said we need to get the regulatory monkey off our back, I don’t see how we can get all the democrat regulatory monkeys off our back all at once and he is one of the lead Monkeys. Him and all the democrats and a few RINOS are that type monkey! Romney is also a lead Monkey, he has a 59 step regulatory plan to keep the monkey on our back!

    Report Post »  
  • ThankBabyJesus
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:08pm

    Save the polar bears newt! Actually they are thriving. oh.

    Report Post » ThankBabyJesus  
    • Anamah
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:24pm

      If Newt can believe that, I can not trust him. He should know that is a complete fabrication in the making A mega business gaining power and money and depressing capitalism and freedom. He must know that because is not stupid. What a terrible revelation at the same time we are sinking to the deep!

      Report Post »  
    • mbriz
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:16am

      No, actually they are not.

      Report Post » mbriz  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:59pm

    LOL! @COMMONSENSE! Either a book or a video.

    I have a very serious question to all who have seen it. I‘m speaking of Callista Gingrich’s hair. It’s just plain weird, man! I have never seen such a do–is it real? It looks like metal. Does Trump know about it? I just had to get that out of my system. I thank you for listening.

    Report Post »  
  • garyM
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:52pm

    Newt made a feeble attempt to show his good nature and to portray himself a friend of those who he should of kept at arms length as an enemy has cost him dearly. I think he sat on the couch with Pelosi to show some kind of non partisanship, not to promote global warming regs! It doesn’t matter what his motive was now, he might as well hang it up after the sheep herders have herded the sheep up into the pen and fed them a bunch of BS!

    Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:02pm

      @WIRE Some of the sheeple may have bought into it..but the government did not..In the Cap and trade deal they were doing nothing to stop “Global Warming” THey were merely going to sell credits to pollute.for industry and had it in the makings to charge each individual household 300-350 dollars for electricity alone..not to mention all the other energy sources that they intended to rob us for..It was always about money..Tax you to breath..

      Report Post »  
  • abbygirl1994
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:47pm

    Yo Newt, its to late to think that will help… why don’t you close up shop.. we know the real you now! God help us!

    Report Post » abbygirl1994  
  • markcooper
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:46pm

    Screw all the scientists! If Rush says it’s not real then I trust him! Those pesky scientists don’t know as much as Rush!

    Report Post »  
    • hauschild
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:19pm

      Especially those scientists that get compensated by governments, right?

      It’s amazing how propaganda continues to work its black magic.

      Report Post »  
  • Stoic one
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:44pm

    Hmn socialism cloaked as climate control to mitigate global warming will not work….

    “Next pile of crap to feed the masses? How about a war with Iran!?!?

    Report Post » Stoic one  
    • piper60
      Posted on March 17, 2012 at 2:20am

      more likely they’ll ho back to predicting a new ice Age.Just pull the old lie sot of their folders, put on a white lab coat and announce a new scientific consensus!

      Report Post » piper60  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:39pm

    I cold only vote for Newt if he were the nominee. I’m not exuberant about any of them but I will vote GOP nonetheless.

    Report Post »  
    • hauschild
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:19pm

      I will not.

      Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:35am

      @ child

      Right. If we can’t find the perfect, true to the cause, never deviating from the script, Republican candidate, then we should go ahead and let Obama keep his current address for another four years, because we can’t sit idly by and blow this chance at having the ideal conservative (none exist, no not one) prop his feet on THE DESK.

      Report Post »  
    • Cosmos102
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:42am

      Hauschild’s response made me crazy too. It’s a poster for the saying “…cutting one‘s nose off to spite one’s face.”

      ANYBODY BUT OBAMA should be our goal.

      Report Post » Cosmos102  
  • garyM
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:32pm

    I think Newt might as go ahead and scrap his campaign, he had a good chance of beating Obama until the talking heads started talking crap. Romney is in front now but you probably won’t see any negative stories on him, he’s already been anointed the nominee. The main problem is he can’t beat Obama, the next problem is he’s a democrat, I guess that would be better than what we got now if he could win, I don’t think he can! Anyone who couldn‘t beat McCain hasn’t got much going on for them. The only difference is in 08 Romney didn’t have all the talking heads trashing all his competition to keep him from being run out of the race. He hasn’t done that well even with all the trashing of his opponents!

    Report Post »  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:35pm

      Once again we see how much of a true Progressive he is.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:36pm

      yes, he should.

      i like how you are scraping your ideals for what others want you to say… pathetic.

      Report Post »  
    • abbygirl1994
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:46pm

      Anyone who votes for Obama over Mitt Romney, has a death wish for this country.. I am sick to death of people sayig Mitt can’t beat Obama.. he can if people will stop beating up Romney for his religion.. he has 100% nore values, morals and character than Obama ever will have.. It is childish and ignorant to hate another for their faith.. Your right, you won’t hear any negative stories about Mitt, because there are none.. He is a God fearing man, who stands on principle.. screw Romneycare, there were so many factors in that you can’t even count them.. and I can honestly say this.. Romney will never ever take this country down a socialist, communist far left path.. People had better wake up.. because if it comes down to Romney and Obama to vote for.. then I will choose Romney.. never in a million years would I want another 4 years of Obama, and those who do.. don’t love America and its freedoms! God help us!

      Report Post » abbygirl1994  
    • hauschild
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:21pm

      @abbygirl1994

      I used to think like you do because I thought every republican after Ronald Reagan was the second coming. It’s obvious I was wrong.

      Report Post »  
    • abbygirl1994
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:03pm

      HAUSCHILD In no way do I think all Republican’s are like the second coming.. in 2007 we had squat to choose from.. McCain is laughable.. Obama ignorant.. and Ron Paul.. possibly dangerous.. I have seen the writing on the wall with Perry, Cain, Newt.. etc… I was leary of Mitt.. even though we have the same faith… but if it one thing I know about a good Mormon is this, they have principles, character, morals and values… So far Romney has shown all of them.. other Mormon’s I would scorn vehemnately is Harry Reid.. There is good and bad in all people.. the bad seeped from Obama and people did not see it.. if anything this country needs it is those qualitites in a Presdient.. and I believe Romney has them all. God help us!

      Report Post » abbygirl1994  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:11pm

      @garym
      I use to think you wete a nsa troll spook… But I’ve changed my mind…you are just a special olympics hero.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • KidCharlemagne
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:31pm

      abbygirl1994
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:46pm
      Romney will never ever take this country down a socialist, communist far left path..
      ======================================

      Oh no….not again (~sigh~):

      “In the video Romney compares and contrasts the healthcare plan he signed into law as Governor of Massachusetts with the one President Barack Obama approved shortly before this appearance. He ends by saying that he wants “to eliminate some of the differences, repeal the bad, and keep the good” in ObamaCare.

      What is perhaps most interesting about the video, says Klein, is that in it Romney “does something you’ll never hear him do these days — note the similarities between” RomneyCare and ObamaCare.”
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFtUO-z-r48

      Report Post »  
  • sWampy
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:29pm

    Republicans for Environmental Protection what the hell, sounds like RINOS, conservatives are the most environmental friendly people on earth, it’s the liberals that **** where they eat.

    Report Post »  
  • Exrepublisheep
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:28pm

    Dumb it down Newt, your party doesn’t understand science.

    Report Post » Exrepublisheep  
    • sWampy
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:32pm

      It’s not science, it’s fable. Man made global warming theory takes more faith than believing in the tooth fairy does. I have spent the last 10 years working for one of the most respected environmental labs in the world, and not a day passes we don’t laugh at the clowns trying to peddle this poop.

      Report Post »  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:42pm

      SWAMPY I have to agree man made global warming is a fraud designed to make a few people very wealthy.I know the ‘green’ BS gave Spain 20% unemployment so our Marxist president must be going for that figure.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:44pm

      i’m not a professional “Weather man”, but i can tell you, from living and observation, that the climate operates on cycles…

      and these shmucks best stop polluting our air, with chemicals in the jet fuel, all in the name of correcting man made global warming. does anyone know what happens if you countersteer when you don’t need to? i’ll tell you… you crash into the ditch.

      nature is the master of adaptation… don’t F with it…

      Report Post »  
    • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:55pm

      When the climate scientist can explain what the correlation between solar activity and the rise in earth temperatures. Plus, why did the temperature on Mars rise at the same time Earth rose? Maybe the sun?

      Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
    • hauschild
      Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:37pm

      @Exrepublisheep

      How‘s it feel to be Al Gore’s useful idiot? You’re making him rich beyond his wildest dreams, but what do you get for it, a warm and fuzzy feeling like you’re really doing something for your country?

      If that’s what does it for you, by all means. But, you’ll pardon me if I sit this one out?

      Report Post »  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on December 31, 2011 at 7:10am

      EXREPUBLISHEEP, you and JZS ought to get together, make a fine couple – Dumb and Dumber.

      Report Post »  
  • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 9:24pm

    Newt, maybe not a good idea, really, you need to put the climate change chapter back in your book, right after the Birther chapter and your theory on Big Foot.

    Maybe you could also put a chapter in your book on how Obama really isn’t such a bad guy and how Pelosi saved Congress. That would really help your campaign.

    Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
  • babylonvi
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:04pm

    So I guess you’ll be voting for Obama again next year Wireman, right? I personally don;t want to return to the 19th century so I won’t be voting for Obama OR Newt.

    Report Post » babylonvi  
  • Howyinthehills
    Posted on December 30, 2011 at 10:56pm

    I don’t know about the 19th century, I think the 17th century would be a little closer to the muck which these Gaia worshippers would return us. I hate to think of the starving millions around 2050 if we stop producing CO2 fertilizer for increased crop yields.

    Report Post » Howyinthehills  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love