Gingrich Tells Supporters on to ‘Florida and Beyond’ in South Carolina Victory Speech
- Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:29pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
Newt is back with a vengeance.
In Gingrich’s speech following his stunning victory in Saturday’s South Carolina GOP primary, the former Speaker of the House made it clear that his roller coaster campaign was back in gear and that foes in the news media, White House and ‘elites in Washington and New York,’ better take cover.
“The American people feel that they have elites who have been trying for a half century to force us to quit being American, and become some kind of other system,” Gingrich said in his victory speech in Columbia. “People completely misunderstand what is going on, it is not that I am a good debater. It is that I articulate the deepest-felt values of the American people.”
The Associated Press notes that Gingrich’s victory marks a remarkable turnabout for the former House speaker, who has battled back twice from near political oblivion. Gingrich’s speech focused on opposition to the President and his plans if elected, for the most part avoiding direct attacks at other Republican candidates.
“We don’t have the kind of money that at least one of the candidates has,” Gingrich said, referring to Romney. “But we do have ideas, and we do have people and we proved here in South Carolina that people power with the right ideas beats big money.”
Obama is “the most effective food stamp president in history,” the former Speaker went on to say. “I would like to be the best paycheck president in American history.”
Gingrich had suffered disappointing finishes in both Iowa and New Hampshire, going into South Carolina with his campaign on life support.
AP reports that Gingrich won Saturday with solid support from conservative and evangelical voters as well as those worried about the economy, according to exit polling. Gingrich was also helped with the endorsement of Texas Governor Rick Perry, who dropped out of the race on Thursday, as well as Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who said if she was South Carolinian she would vote for Gingrich.
Gingrich encouraged his supporters to come along with him for his campaign’s next stop at Florida’s January 31 primary. “With your help, we are now moving on to Florida and beyond,” he said.
Highlights of Gingrich’s speech:
Gingrich’s full 24-minute speech:
Comments (74)
Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 691 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 491 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 343 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 314 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 327 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 233 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 314 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Jubie
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:50pmZzzzzz….Zzzzzzz…Zzzzzz
Did anyone else want to fall asleep during this speech? 24min to say what he had to say, dose bloviating come to mind. Good in debates terrible in a speech. Remember everyone when you are president you don’t debate anymore. You are an orator. I am sorry to all the people who like him but he is going to have to setup up his game if he wants to win.
As a side note. Listen to the crowd’s reaction as the speech wares on. The applause gets less and less, and their enthusiasm goes down.
Report Post »imsteph
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:22pmbelieve the primary result was more of a rejection of the msm than it was really for newt.
Report Post »the American people are tired of the games the media plays and they were telling them to shove it.
however-the liberals got what they wanted anyway–the republican party looking like they can’t get their ducks in a row and back one candidate….they would like to see this thing go down all the way to the convention with animosity, vitriol, and venom until the ‘last man standing’ is so abused, beaten, and the party fragmented that it would look obvious that the ‘boy who would be king’ would be re-elected.
of course they already have their pollsters in place to make that happen one way or the other.
isn‘t it fun being pawns in someone else’s childish, evil, game?
Trance
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:34amGingrich is starting to say the right things. It reminds me of Reagan. I’m just surprised people are buying it.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:31amRomney has experience rounding up New England Liberals for more Socialist Progressive legislation and cronie capitalism.
Gingrich has led a nation into true lower unemployment, less dependency on welfare, balanced bugets
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:40am@TheBlaze Moderators
Just STOP with your silly little “your profile” loop game. FYI: I’ll be emailing Glenn for the third time.
ANYONE experiencing indescretions from TheBlaze Moderators, ie: Their “your profile” loop “game, “selective censorship, or whatever, contact Glenn via:
me@glennbeck.com
NEWT 2012
Report Post »Thevoice
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:36amPeople again your going to be looking at least a 16 year fight to undo generations of “Progressive” unconstitutional legislation. It will be a fight right from your local state to federal. There is so much uncommon sense to unwrap in our Federal government. The important thing is we get started. But remember we will be doing this in a time wear there is a growing foreign enemy that already once hit us with a decapitation strike. Which basically worked because of our self gratification and greed. and lack of faith that we could bring our enemy to surrender and victory in this age. None even Ron Paul is going to get to Washington and bring the moving trucks for the desk squatter , entitlement society . Time and a true game plan is what will restore America. If the American people have a leader that can clearly covey what will restore our society that’s who you go with.
Report Post »Scrap-Diversity
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:43amHuh ? wear , where , weir what the hell it’s only a word, wright ?
Report Post »Thevoice
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:53amSorry unless Ron Paul has given you the information on the moving company he hired. Until then his words are just that . None of these people are going to be able to come in and close up and shut the lights off on the Washington desk squatter company it will take years. In the mean time Ron Paul would be the last guy you would hire to guard a 7/11 …So sorry we will need a major strong national defense to protect our liberties and we restore them.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:59amNewt Gingrich will always be the smartest man in the room, therefore he is the candidate of choice from those who are running. He has experience and the knowledge to undo much of Obama and the Socialist agenda.
What is the policy of comparing Gingrich’s sins to others who have sinned?
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:20amI can hardly bear to watch MSNBC/Maddow – but I’ve forced myself lately to see their take of the GOP elections. They are thrilled at the prospects of a Mitt or Newt candidate going against Obama. They continually run clips of Mitt and Newt’s own words that make Obama look like a saint. These clips are ready made campaign endorsements for Obama.
Ron Paul may not be the best ‘grandstander/actor’ but his principles run circles around Obama any day and his steady Constitutional record cannot be disputed by Obama.
Liberals, Independents, and Libertarians will NEVER vote for Mitt or Newt. Those, plus the ABO people, would vote for Ron Paul in the general. Republicans had better do the math or we’re in for another 4 years of Obama!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:20amNewt the SMARTEST man in the room? NO…The most manipulative…Explain his foriegn policy in light of the Constitution please…
ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8
The Congress shall have Power:
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress….
Where does it say the PRESIDENT has any power to declare a war, send in drones, to nation build or to assasinate anyone anywhere that we as a Nation do not like? Newt is a NEOCONSERVATIVE that does not follow our Constitution…
Restore LIBERTY and FREEDOM…
Report Post »Ron paul 2012
poverty.sucks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:44amEh Dog, you’re as intelligent as a K9, go fetch the Paul Ball, good boy!
Gingrich has demonstrated the ability to lead a republican controlled congress into prosperity.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:06amALL One or Two [with many monikers] Of You Holier-Than-Newts are becoming TOO Redundant and TOO Boring!
It’s gotta be hard, maintaining all that Holier-Than-Thou perfection. That’s a Mighty-Slippery-Slope you’ve chosen!
What will you do when you revert to being human and make some bad choices and fall off of there? THAT would be the time to do what Newt and a Whole Lot of Us have done = Take Up Jesus’ Offer Of Being Your Lord and Savior and Redeemer. :-)
Keep Going Newt! Keep Ignoring The Smear Guns! You Are America’s Standard Bearer With The Look Of Eagles! Almighty God Is With You!
God Bless and Guide America and Newt, In Jesus’ Name!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:07amWhy does a dog hump a leg, after licking himself its the only alternative.
Going to war and overcoming aggression is required in order to remain prosperous. Having a dog that runs from strangers is useless.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:19amYou do know that Newts hero’s are all progressives? TR,Wilson and FDR,he thought FDR was our greatest president,the man who expanded the size of the federal government almost as much as our current Marxist president.He also supports the individual mandate so if you‘re a conservative I don’t see how you could support a progressive like Newt,or am I missing something? If you care to explain go ahead and sound off,I’ll read it.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:31amCan someone…ANYONE debate Newts foriegn policy based on the Constitution? ANYONE? Just one comment…anyone? No you cannot because his positionis that of perpetual Unconstitutional wars….Wake up America you have been duoed by the war machinne!
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:32amWhat’s there to debate, you mess with USA and there’s hell to pay. The world is full of people who desire to kill us.
Go lay down down, Bad Dog…
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 1:21am@ Baddoggy
Report Post »I’m not for Newt — I consider him the worst of the 4 remaining.
That being said, you are looking at the wrong part of the U.S. Constitution if you are looking for the President’s powers. Article I deals with Congress. Article II deals with the President and Section 2 of that article provides that “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.” This power includes armed conflit without a declaration of war — the undeclared war with France in the late 1700′s is the earliest (and therefore the best, because of its temporal proximity to the ratification of the Constitution) example of the application of that executive power.
GulfPeg
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:35amI sure hope that the Floridians aren’t “B I G O T S” like the South Carolinians. The S.C just can’t handle Mormons.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:32amYou sound just like MSNBC. Eat ****. You will never understand the rebel yell. MF right SC
Report Post »Ronin Gael
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:37amMormanism? Bigots?
Reasoned opposition is the exact cerebral opposite of bigots who think with their weenies. Deal with the facts not ad homenim slander. Don’t be a bigot yerself, eh?
I am agin the Big Mitt because I have watched him and known him since 1994. He is a RINO defined and a lip service limp wrist in his own faith. His conscience is one of convenience. His principles formed of putty, not steel.
Like a Kennedy, he has been groomed first by his big city liberal Daddy then himself for the “big slot”. A Rockerfeller/Bush establishment/country club Republican that needs the Jethros and and cousin humping Hillbillies like me to get elected…..then we never hear from the bastards again except when they come to close our factories, collect our guns, steal our gold and to then mock our women and our God.
The eternal list of ever the changing Mitt….can anyone dispute this…..
Baby killing? He was for it now agin it?
Gun grabbing? He was for it now agin it?
Nazi style health care? He was for it….now agin it…except in MA where it works? Where it works?…..give me a flipping break.
Voting agin a flip flopping timid little weenie is not being a bigot….it is being a real republican in defense of the Republic.
Pick ur poison….he is not the kind a warrior chief the Republic needs now to survive for another few years, let alone thru this coming century.
The Constitution and Liberty. Now and forever. Make it count. Vote bold. Time is s
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:44amSarah Palin / Tea Party / 9-12ers have complexly abandoned their principles by supporting an unethical/crook like Newt! They will hand Obama another 4 years on a silver platter! What a joke!
Liberals, Independents, and Libertarians will never vote for Mitt or Newt.
Come on Florida Republicans – prove you understand the importance of this election. Stand with the Constitution! Don’t just talk-the-talk!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:06amSouth carolina must have been smoking Palmetto last night. Or they have never got their meth problem under control. But what can you expect from a bunch of inbreds anyway?
Report Post »Scrap-Diversity
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:46am@Baddoggy. Point ?
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:32am“I’m not going to say anything bad about my ex-wife Marianne”
With that said, I have nothing further to say.
Report Post »Scrap-Diversity
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:48am@Baddoggy.. Nice comment , you Paulies are as much or more of a kook as he is..
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:33amScrap…I know you either hate the Constitution or have not read it…Or you maybe are a Marxist. My hunch is that you are a Neoconservative that shuns the Founders principles for self worth..Have a nice murderous life…
Report Post »cassandra
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:51amNewt always quotes the progressives his favorite presidents, woodrow willson,FDR,Andrew Jackson come on people Newt will destroy our Constitution what little is left, he is just another obama, posing as a republican
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:35amClear example of a Beckbot here folks. Many stupid accusations out of context and zero truth.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:10amMSGT…
Please try to explain Newt’s position on war using the Constitution. Can you do it? Can anyone? Hell no they cannot!!
ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8
The Congress shall have Power:
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress….
Where does it say the PRESIDENT has any power to declare a war, send in drones, to nation build or to assasinate anyone anywhere that we as a Nation do not like? You are ignorant in Constitutional law my friend…
Restor LIBERTY and FREEDOM…
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:02am@Baddoggy You’re using the constitution to prove your position is correct on a progressive like msgt?
Report Post »We both know you‘re right but msgt is a drone who’ll believe anything a progressive says.I‘ve tried talking to people like msgt and it’s a lost cause,they‘re obtuse and simply won’t listen
camericanc
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:50amHow Dr.Paul won the race.
Report Post »http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/12/ron-paul-delegates-president-barack-obama_n_1202586.html
Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:17amThis article will open some eyes to the strategy. Wow, is it going to shock a lot of people when RP is their President! ROFL
Report Post »Scrap-Diversity
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:57am@Baddoggy.. Why are you on the blaze ? lmao he reads and agrees with an article on the huffpo ONLY because it’s a pro Ron Paul article.. But ANY OTHER article he wouldn’t believe if the truth of it smashed him on his head, literally. After this he will go back to using the huffo as some sort of ammunition to the people who‘s comments he doesn’t like or agree with, With : GO BACK TO THE HUFFPO IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT YOU LIBERAL NUT.<< Or something to that effect…Now I've seen it all the blaze has come full circle. It's no wonder why I left in the first place. Because of the stupid people and their stupid comments..
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:39amTYhere is no liberal neocon bone in my body. I am smart enough to read all articles and do not blindly follow anyone. I see the nuts at Huffpo. I also see there is an air of truth to some articles though very very rare…
You on the other hand listen to the lamnestream media and FOX and Glenn and do not use your own brain to know what is Constitutional and what is not. You have nothing more than a lemming soul…Even Glenn says to do your own homework..I have. You have not! So who should leave?
I stand for the constitution and liberty. You stand for what ever Fox News tells you…
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:44amJim Demint on RP…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA_dIaF1nrQ
Report Post »pandora
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:49amIt’s hard to trust anyone, period. All of the candidates have conflicts. But we must consider that we do have one known quantity – and that’s Barack Obama. We know that he is and will destroy America. If we are to go on as a country we have to be as logical as we can. During the primaries, we all need to vote for the person who we believe is the best candidate. But when the primaries are over, we will be left with a single person and whether we like it or not that person must beat Obama. We have to believe they cannot be worse. So, I say that anyone who is even entertaining the idea of writing in a candidate in the general election will actually be voting for Obama. Think a bit about that and see how you would feel if Obama wins.
Report Post »eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:49amEXACTLY!
And….THAT’S the bottom line….TO GET OBAMA OUT!
Visualize this:
Ron Paul debating Obama – A GIFT TO OBAMA – OBAMA WINS!
Santorium debating Obama – Santorium’s head explodes – he goes into a hissy fit.
Romney debating Obama – BOTH of them suttering, stammering, flip-flopping and lieing.
Newt debating Obama – Obama slings Personal attacks –
NEWT repeatedly and successfully attacks OBAMA”S POTUS RECORD.
Obama can‘t run ON his Record AND can’t run FROM his Record.
Obama brings up Newt’s Congressional Record –
ALREADY KNOWN TO EVERYONE- THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY.
NO LONGER MATTERS –
Newt attacks Obama’s CURRENT POTUS RECORD –
Obama CAN’T tell the truth about it, can’t answer truthfully, can’t tell, can’t explain
AND CAN’T STAND ON IT.
NEWT WINS!
Report Post »MrMagoo
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:13amHe’ll never be a President.Obama wasn’t supposed to be either,but did.Time to buckle down and stop the madness.47 States to go.
Report Post »skiziks20453
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:21amNewt is smart enough to tap into the ANGER that is huge in the electorate. he will win with that strategy.
Report Post »camericanc
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:16amFlorida is an all Delegates or nothing state with a flawed voting process.
Report Post »-
Are YOU ALL INSANE!!! The ignorance on this board is appalling. Do any of you use the internet to research candidates or are you addicted to being spoon fed by paid personalities on the MSM?
-
Here are some facts for those late to the game. Gingrich is not on the ballot in several states. He cannot win. Santorum is not on the ballot in several states, has no money and he cannot win. America is NEVER going to elect a mormon, never mind a flip-flopping you’re just jealous 1%er, I have my magic underpants like Romney. He cannot win. Dr. Paul is the only one with the grassroots, money, 50 state ballot access (even as third party!) He will win and force a brokered convention. Or force the GOP to bend over and capitulate like Ron Reagan did against Gerald Ford. I know (You can’t handle the truth) How can you be pro Constitution yet anti Dr. Paul?
-
Keep saying Ron Paul has no chance,
Ron Paul has no chance,
Ron Paul has no chance,
while clicking your heels!
And Dr. Paul supporters will work even harder to change the discussion of politics today. After all what has happened to the Republicans WAR rhetoric this year? They know America is running out of blood to give.
Obama is loved by the bankers and their corporate whores. Why would they swap him? Romney might be buddies with a few but there is more profit to be made in Americas destruction and Obama is the perfect fall guy. Obama! FOUR MOR
Baddoggy
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:25am@CAMERICANC…
Very well put. The Republican party will go back to the Founders principles or we will die as a Nation. We have to take them back kicking and screaming. They want to control the world and we want Freedom and Liberety and the restoration of our Constitution.
You Constitution haters are going to be happy when it is restored. You can thank us Paulbots later…
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:01amWait a minute. If you’re in South Carolina, and you go to Florida and beyond, you end up in Cuba. Newt is defecting to the Communists!
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 1:05amGood one, Chet.
Report Post »Trading_barracuda
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:05amAll I know is we better get rockin‘ in Iran before the taxpayers know what hit ’em.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:46amWow, I am talking Wow, Wow , Wow … I found an hour long video from the Birch Society talking about Newt Gingrich and how he completely disdained the constitution. No, I mean this man is responsible for growing government, extending the powers of government, called my a great number of sources an Internationalist. Even Clinton supported and called him this. I am not kidding, this is a must see, your Jaw will drop. I will take the time tomorrow and break this video down and put it into a list form and send it to the Romney camp. If not for Newts vote, there would be no Federal Department of Education. It would have only takin 3 votes to stop it, but Newt voted with the Democrats. Another bright idea by this jag -off, like the one that cost my Mom her job. BLAZE, YOU NEED TO GET ON THIS… This man’s past is very scary, I mean, vot5ing for and setting up for the lost of American sovereignty. I can go on and on, but you have to watch video, I mean, you will be shocked that this man has even made it to the place he has in the candidate. He is for NWO, I believe he is one of their boys. He started the sending of foreign aid> I am shaking as I write this, this is some messed up stuff. PLEASE BROTHERS AND SISTERS, WATCH THIS VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq4lde9wghI
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:14amHobbs…I’ve seen that video. I know I won’t be voting for Gingrich.
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:18amThe Birch society? all i can say, is WOW
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:25am@ California – Are you mocking me or have you seen the video ? I don‘t know who the John Birch Society is but the information laid out here really doesn’t matter. I had fact checked a great deal of it and everything is true so far. Very disturbing this man has made it into the race for president, but I find it especially disturbing so bigots voted for him in SC considering the ignorant pick of a progressive this man is. Are you a Newt fan ?
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:43amTruth is truth, no matter where you find it.
Report Post »Scrap-Diversity
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:07am@Hobbs57.. lmao an hour long cut and paste job and you’re shaking as you write.. WOW !!
Report Post »You’ll believe anything , huh ?
progressiveslayer
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:00amHobbs I know Gingrich is a big government progressive who‘s hero’s are all progressive presidents,TR Wilson and FDR.He’s a member of cfr and believes in the individual mandate where the federal government can force us to buy a good or service.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:59amROMNEYCARE DOESN’T EQUAL OBAMACARE, GINGRICHCARE EQUALS OBAMACARE…
You guys are all funny. If you think RomneyCare created ObamaCare, then by that logic, GingrichCare birthed RomneyCare, but instead Romney’s Health Care plan had a state run individual mandate, which is constitutional under their constitution. Gingrich on the other hand wanted a federal individual mandate and he praised Romney for RomneyCare. He doubled down on it on May 15 2011, 7 months ago for an individual mandate and that is why Gingrich fell the first time.
ObamaCare has a federally controlled individual mandate and so does GingrichCare, much different than RomneyCare.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:20amYep, The Center for Healthcare Transformation is the group who brought the fir pilot program for Medicaiade to my mother company. A practice run for Obamcare, if you will. This lead to the company losing 23 million dollars. Should be no surprise that like all government programs designed with claims of saving massive amounts of money, only to triple the costs. These smarty pants intellectual elites like New Gingrich are the great reason our nation is being ripped apart at the seams. 110 to 206, Vote to create the Department of Education that would have only required 3 votes to stop. Well, Newt’s vote was on of the three that ensured we got the Department of Education. The constitution doesn’t allow for such a program, as it also doesn’t allow for land grabs, but Newt sponsored a huge Alaskan land grab. Guess which land this is in Alaska that Newt voted to get established as untouchable land ?? Yes, the land we can’t drill on now. Yet there is Palin supporting Newt… Wow, seriously, does anybody research ? I mean Palin was the governor of Alaska, shouldn’t she know it was Newt who voted for the land grab of Jimmy Carter ? She has to know, so why then is she supporting him ? Even more scary to think about, who is Sarah Palin ?? I don’t know people, but Newt Gingrich is a very scary person. You Paul people should know all about this, but, why haven’t I seen your attack on Newt ? only on Romney.Here is the video to support this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq4lde9wghI
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:30pm@ TeaPartyForRomney
The Tea Party is not for Romney; he is a big government progressive.
Romneycare is the foundation of Obamacare. It is big government on display.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:57amFor all that the Tea Party stands for, please do not vote for Newt Gingrich. These are videos of him, in his own words praising the progressive FDR as the greatest president in the 20th century, not Reagan. He calls himself a ‘real politic Wilsonian’ after the progressive Woodrow Wilson, and praising the progressive movement as a greatest movement in our time. These are not just clips taken out of context, they are full quotes. We need to fight to keep progressives out of our government, for he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Report Post »Remember that he also wanted a FEDERAL individual mandate as early as May 2011 on Meeting the Press. Then he changed his rhetoric after his campaign fell apart, which fell apart because of his praise of the IM and against conservative social engineering, most likely because of political necessity. Remember also that he admitted that he had changed his book, removing the section on Global Warming, because of political pressure, this within the last few months. Even his scientist friend that wrote the chapter as his ghost writer, for his book, is speaking out against his change. If these are true changes, why would they have changed within the last few months. Remember also that he admitted that he had changed his book, removing the section on Global Warming, because of political pressure, this within the last few months. Even his scientist friend that wrote the chapter as his ghost writer, for his book, is speaking out against his change.
Hobbs57
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:36amI just located a very interesting piece of data about Newt Gingrich, as identified by the Birch Society. Did you know the when the Federal Department of Education was formed, it would have only taken 3 votes to have stopped it, but guess what. Newt wasn’t one of those men. Newt votes YEAH, and ensures the forming of our wonderful Department of Education. Now isn’t this interesting. You think this is bad, there is much much more about this communist minded fool pushing for a world government. Wow, this is a must see. They are asking the same questions we are hearing about him today. This ***** was a loser and jerk even as he was speaker, campaigning for Nelson Rockefeller, while taking student deferments for the Vietnam War. The Third Wave, the book by Newts buddie that he heavily endorsed calling for the constitution to be replaced. O h yes, this is the book he recommended to his new recruits as they became house members. The book calling the what the “Founding Parents”, is dangerous. To renew America, by Gingrich, is whole revealing mess in itself. Newt was announced by Europe as Internationalist. Newt , having Clinton agree Newt was on his side as an Internationalist. Warren Christopher announced asked on word to describe Newt, he said Internationalist. Interesting how the council on foreign relations was a part of Newt, suggesting we need to rethink our constitution and need a strong central government.WOW – must see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq4lde9wghI
Report Post »peteto1
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:55amJust goes to prove what a bunch of PHONIES Palin, Rush, Chuck Norris, Hannity, etc. are. Nobody that’s a TRUE Conservative votes for a dishonorable and dishonest man. Gingrich has a history of being emotionally abusive and dishonest to past wives, ethics violations professionally, and multiple examples of being a proponent of “Big Government” and weakened sovereignty (e.g.- NAFTA, GATT). Apparently, they have no problem with a sleazy man representing them. They must really be looking forward to setting a new standard: “the President and First ‘Ho”…………
Report Post »Lighthearted
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:47amOpen letter to Glenn Beck:
Report Post »I have been a listener of your radio program for years now. I believe you have America’s best interests at heart, but I am personally turned off by your obsession with taking down Newt Gingrich. He has gained the support of so many of us because he is the only one who will take on the MSM and Republican establishment. He is imperfect, but I will go with the candidate who has the stones to fight for us. Did you hear Santorum’s speech tonight after the primary? He is posturing himself as the candidate who will bring in the so-called Reagan Democrats. How will he do this? By making sure everyone has an “equal chance to succeed, with access to education, training, manufacturing jobs” etc. Sounds like a big government progressive to me. Prove me wrong. But stop berating your listeners who have taken a look at the field of candidates and concluded that Newt is the only one who will take it to Obama and fight to win.
camericanc
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:37amIf you have really looked at Newt’s long record? You are well aware Newt has more to fear from himself then anything Glenn the clown could say. Get a grip with reality. Newt has no chance! He doesn’t have the money or ballet access. It’s all a horse and pony show, Santorum is out next handing delegates to Newt. Then Newt will be gone, handing his delegates to Romney. Even with all the delegates given by other candidates given to Romney he will not have the required 1440. This could lead to a brokered convention that Ron Paul supporters have been preparing for the last 5 years by learning and participating in the delegate process. Welcome aboard the Ron Paul r3VOLution!
Report Post »-
I know your thinking the media told you Ron Paul can’t win! I hope you don‘t expect them to print a retraction or say i’m sorry?
KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:24amI wonder if Newt will tell the chronically unemployed in Florida that he helped to cause the housing collapse??:
——————————————–
“Gingrich Backed Freddie in 2007 Interview
DECEMBER 2, 2011
His Comments in Support of the Mortgage Giant’s Business Model Came as Housing Bust Was Dragging Down Company
By NICK TIMIRAOS and PATRICK O’CONNOR
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich touted the virtues of Freddie Mac’s business model in an interview published by the company in April 2007, remarks that contrast with the candidate’s recent statements that he had warned the company of impending financial disaster.
The interview was featured on Freddie Mac’s website for several months in 2007 when he was a paid consultant to the company and Freddie Mac was struggling to address mounting financial problems as the housing boom was turning to bust.”
Report Post »http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204012004577072502921422584.html
Hobbs57
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:03amThere is much much more on Newt Gingrich. This man has literally determined the Constitution needs re-written. He is seriously a socio-path and I am quite frightened that this man has even made it to the place of being candidate after watching this video by the birch society (sp). Must see, over an hour long explaining just how off the hook Newt Gingrich is. Seriously, he is all about world government, just like all progressives, he imagines he come up with these wonder ideas using the government institution to makes things operate more efficiently and effectively. Newt and Dole sold our party out. While Newt was the leader, the single largest tax. Mr I balanced the budget, also taxed the crap out of us. I am going to buy his book, To renew America, so I can find out more on this man before it is to late. The ideas he fosters are the likes of internationalist and this is where the money supporting him is coming from. Newt campaigned for Nelson Rockefeller, the whole NAFTA thing, and they keep talking about this Gaf Accord or something with Dole ?? I can’t find anything on it or maybe I am not hearing the name right, but this accord seriously empowered federal government, as Newt is certainly for a strong central government. Sorry about my grammar, but my mind is racing from watching this video. Newt is every single thing Glenn warned us about. How does he stay under the radar on this stuff ? Please watch – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq4lde9wghI
Report Post »hogtrashhd
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:17amI see Newt’s onto fox… he’s going on all the sunday shows except abc and fox.. i can smell crap a mile away and it looks like Newt can too.. fox’s “conservative” talking heads have all fell in line with mitt.. man why did reupurt have to get caught hacking phones.. he’s stupid… now obama and soros have him by the short hairs.. and they are pulling the hairs on that one.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:28amHe may be “on to Florida” .. but I can tell you that I have been invited to 3 Santorum events, 1 Newt event, and no Romney event .. if they are coming to the area I get the information .. from the candidate, Republican Party ,and or TEA Party. Shows that Santorum is the HARD WORKER in the lot.
Report Post »Scrap-Diversity
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:11am@CatB.. Yeah because you’re so impotant , huh ?
TEA
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:43pmThe eventual nominee always wins SC
Romney and Santorum supporters it’s time to rally behind Newt and build a machine to defeat Barack Obama
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:19amI will destroy this progressive global elite minion in the infowar. I will not turn my back on principals.
I will write-in RON PAUL if I have to.
I think if RON runs INDEPENDENT, he would beat the RepubliCONS and DemocRATS !!!!!
How can educated people not see this slimeball is more of the same?
Another slick-talking career politician, posing as a conservative.
He is a Communist that doesn’t like gays or abortion, so that makes him a Conservative. lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6n_-wB154
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:28amPROBIEMSOIVER everyone is this or that… You talk freedom but the will of the people is meaningless to the Bots. It is only what you want that counts… and you wonder why Dr Ron doesn’t get any traction. His supporters are his worst enemy
Report Post »Be Arrogant
Be Condescending
.Be self-important
Be self-righteous
When that doesn’t work, I’m taking my ball and going home.. Well, shut up and go!
ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:37am@REPUBLICORP
Let me explain something to you.
If we don’t go back to a Currency based on gold or silver printed by our treasury under authority of congress, and Quit the United Nations, IT is GAME OVER for civil discourse !!!!!
RON is the only candidate that is anti-establishment and would end Progressive Terrorists such as the FED and their little collection agency; the IRS. In addition to the EPA, DOE, (Education and Energy, both of which, produce none of the implied).
Regarding your comment about odious and disparaging remarks, it is painfully obvious that the right wingers use the terms Paulbots, Paulistinians, Tin-foil hat wearers, etc., more than PAUL supporters comment on the lack of substance or intelligence of Neocons.
I find your moniker interesting.
Report Post »Were you aware that our once Sovereign Republics (States) became Subsidiary Corporations of the Mother Corporation; They trademarked the name “United States” and the corporation was est. in 1871. They created Washington D.C. to be their head office
This Corporation still operates posing as a representative republic government of the people for obvious reasons.
lol. I tell people daily. For my main objective at this time in my life, is to destroy the Global Elite that
have seized my Country by nefarious and clandestine means.
ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:50am*Sovereign Republics (States) became Subsidiary Corporations of the Mother Corporation ( the federal government ); The Global Elite (yes, they go way back) trademarked the name “United States” and the corporation was est. in 1871. They created Washington D.C. to be their head office.
http://www.teamlaw.net/history.htm
http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:26amDr Ron can’t claim purity when it comes to corporate subsidies. The Washington Post reported that he pressed the U.S. energy secretary in 2008 to approve a federal loan guarantee to expand a nuclear facility in Texas.
This contradicts statements Paul made in his 1981 book “Gold, Peace, and Prosperity,” in which he slams federally guaranteed loans, calling them “the most significant contributing factor to our inflation.”
Paul insists that the government should let the free market determine how energy is produced. He told the left-leaning Grist magazine in 2007 that research and development subsidies “are bound and determined to always misdirect money to political cronies,” and he criticized the federal government for providing ethanol subsidies.
But Paul tried to help certain industries by co-sponsoring legislation that included tax credits. One bill from 2011 promised $5 billion in credits to the natural gas industry. Another measure from 2009 promoted fuel efficiency with a $2,000 deduction for individuals who swapped gas guzzlers for fuel-efficient cars.
Report Post »As for earmarks, the congressman requested at least $157 million for fiscal year 2011, and another $398 million for fiscal year 2010, according to his congressional Web site. The provisions included $2.5 million for a “Historic Downtown Redevelopment Project” in Baytown, Texas; $8 million for replacing recreational fishing piers damaged during hurricanes; and $18 million for ship canal operation
RepubliCorp
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:47am“RON is the only candidate that is anti-establishment” 30yrs on the government dole is establishment! . Gold/silver, you don‘t get anything out of a gold standard that you didn’t bring with you. If your government is a credible steward of the money supply, you don’t need it; and if it isn’t, it won’t be able to stay on it long anyway. (See Argentina’s dollar peg). Meanwhile, the limitations on the government’s ability to respond to fiscal crises, the necessity of defending against speculative attacks in times of crises, and the possibility of independent changes in the relative price of gold, make your economy more unstable. It’s a terrible idea, which is why there are so few economists willing to raise their voices in support of it.No Ron Paul supporter (or other gold standard advocate) has managed to articulate to me what problem the gold standard solves.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:04amNo, a Global Elite with a monopoly money printer is a bad idea.
Report Post »Imagine for a minute that you can print up as much money, as there is ink.
You going to surrender that power easily? No way.
We DO NOT have to trade currencies with other Nations. WE can BARTER !!!!
It’s time to close the “shop” for renovations.
We must grant authority back to the U.S. Treasury to print REAL AMERICAN MONEY based on a standard to prevent inflation and criminal activities !!!!
I want to go to a bank one week and trade in a check for gold, like the old days !!!!!
I provide a service. I Accept GOLD !!!!!! I DO NOT NEED MONOPOLY MONEY printed from thin air by a PRIVATE BANK !!!!!!!
In regards to your comment about free market electric.
I would love to see lots in Neighborhoods become electric companies.
It would be easy. Simply purchase a lot install massive generator. Landscape to disquise.
Call the Gas co. for a delivery. Run some wires to the neighbors that want to do business with you. DONE.
He may have to compete with a competitor in the area. This would end a electric monopoly and bring prices down.
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:30pmExcellent speech; off to FLORIDA. Should be very interesting.
Go get ‘em Newt!
Report Post »