Politics

Gingrich to Romney: The Only Reason You Didn‘t Become a Career Politician Is Because You Lost to Ted Kennedy in ’94

Gingrich Says Romney Didnt Become a Career Politician is Because You Lost to Ted Kennedy in 94

Saturday night’s GOP presidential debate in Iowa was certainly animated, and got particular feisty when the campaign’s two frontrunners went at each other. Within the first twenty minutes of the two hour debate former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich were exchanging blows.

After being asked by ABC moderator George Stephanopoulos about Romney’s specific disagreements from Gingrich that make him more conservative, Romney took a moment before presenting his opposition to the former Speaker’s “idea to have a lunar colony that would mine minerals from the moon,” statements that some have said look to knock down child labor laws, and views on the capital gains tax that the former Massachusetts governor disagrees with.

“I spent my life in the private sector,” Romney said. “I understand how the economy works. I believe for Americans to say goodbye to President Obama and elect a Republican; they need to have confidence the person they’re electing knows how to make this economy work again and create jobs for the American middle class.”

Shrewd as ever, Gingrich responded “Let’s be candid, the only reason you didn’t become a career politician is you lost to Teddy Kennedy in 1994.”

Following the cutting observation, Gingrich defended his support of the space program and providing early work opportunities for children in poverty, and said he was “astonished” that a businessman of Romney’s stature disagreed with his stance on the capital gains tax.

Romney later responded to the Ted Kennedy line: “with regards to the idea that if I’d beaten Ted Kennedy, I could’ve been a career politician, that’s probably true.  If I would’ve been able to get in the NFL liked I hope when I was a kid, why, I woulda  been a football star all my life too.

“I spent my life in the private sector,” said Romney following applause and laughter. “Losing to Teddy Kennedy was probably the best thing I could have done for  preparing me for the job I’m seeking, because it put me back in the private sector.  I worked in the private sector, I learned lessons that are desperately needed in Washington.”

The full back and forth from Mediaite:

Comments (225)

1 2 3
  • LIBS-ARE-DINGLEHEADS
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:05am

    Here’s the problem(s) – candidate by candidate.
    (Using the criteria of the “typical US voter” – as deep as a mud puddle in thought – and 47% of them are on the Obama dole). Think about this as you go down the list.

    1. Santorum. Unelectable. OUT of touch. Too “faithy” for the dumbed down masses.

    2. Bachmann: Too churchy. Too whacked out. Too whiny. “I don‘t like her as she’s against gays”…(again….think like a trailer dweller, who has an “Uncle Steve, who is light in his boots…but we love him!”)

    3. Rick Perry. Too “Bushy” (Hey…he sounds like Bush……bleeech!)

    4. Newt Gingrich. He looks sinister. Scary. Talks above me. “What did he say????”….and his bird-looking wife can use her hair as a helmet (an aside..she IS butt-ugly – plus the name….Callista….Oi!)

    5. Ron Paul. Too old. Squeaky voice. Too bald. His son has a poodle sleeping on his punkin head.

    6. Mitthew Romney. Looked too “Tasered”. Too “canned”. Too rich. “He ain’t one of us”.

    7. Jon Huntsman. Who?

    THAT is the way the masses think. Sorry to say. AND…to THEM….Oblamer seems “Presidential”…..

    PRAY that Obummer has a massive stroke…..

    Report Post » LIBS-ARE-DINGLEHEADS  
    • cao
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:54am

      So that Biden can be president? Are you nuts?

      Report Post » cao  
    • loriann12
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:01am

      That’s pretty good. But I keep hearing that Romney “looks presidential” from the media, as if that should be the only requirement. Heck, it was for Obama. Newt offends the less intelligent because they can’t follow him, and they THINK he‘s rubbing his intelligence in everyone’s faces. But, he knows history, and knows that anyone who doesn’t know history is doomed to repeat it. I’m a breast cancer survivor (stage 4, which means I WILL eventually get it again) and IF Newt was having problems with his wife before her cancer, I can tell you this: I would rather my husband leave me than stay with me only because I got cancer. Staying would have put even more stress on her with a bad marriage and stress slows your recovery.

      Report Post »  
    • bolsen00
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:20am

      With this snipe…the REAL Gingrich showed up! He‘s such a liar that he’s changed at 68! Right there is why he was kicked out of Washington! Say anything! Gingrich is so dirty! He does it all under the bologne of “let’s be candid?” If people continue to let Gingrich getnawaynwith his same old garbage way he talks to people…they deserve to be talked to like garbage by him…and they will be!

      Report Post »  
    • TRUTHandFREEDOM
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:27am

      Can’t pray for harm to others, but we can pray for him to be enlightened with enough Christian principles that he denounces all that his administration and all that progressivism has done to harm our freedom and that he then advocates for Constitutional adherance, individual rights and liberty and individual salvation, clearly pointing out the LIES (Bible teaches socialism”?) spewed by his religeous czar Jim Wallis.

      Yeah, I know it’s a huge prayer, but we have to think big in difficult times.

      To defeat progressivism is the answer.

      Report Post »  
    • dissentnow
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:39am

      “PRAY that Obummer has a massive stroke”

      It’s nice to see all of the loving, peaceful, pro-life Christians here at the blaze in action.

      Report Post »  
    • Rayblue
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:17am

      Obama can’t have a stroke. There’s a bicycle pump where his heart should be.
      Maybe if he had a sudden enlightenment. That life isn’t a game for his enjoyment.
      That’d do him in sure as anything.

      Report Post » Rayblue  
    • whereareyourbrains
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:34am

      Think about this…the comie-socialist-drunken sailor spending president we have now who really only likes Muslims and any country but ours. Who has done nothing but divide us with class warfare and blame everyone but himself for doubling down on our debt (so he can collapse us). I will take any one on that list that you so cynically described each one like they are useless. WE already have the worst in power…anyone is an approvement..

      Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:48am

      bolsen00

      I think you have Newt confused with Obama

      I don‘t know what debate you were watch but sure wasn’t the one I saw. What lie did Newt say?

      Report Post » Miami  
    • Luke21
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:11am

      @Libs,

      Good analysis on image the media is painting each by. For now, they prop Gingrich & Romney up (they will “Cain” Gingrich, & Romney will be portrayed as the same as Obama in the general – for now both are useful). The have to marginalize/character kill (ala Cain) the others now – lest you get an unpredictable/wildhorse (Paul, Santorum, Bachman) in the general, and run the risk of having the marxist train derailed. Even if Gingrich (a serial philanderer, inside trading, pathologically lying, global warming, beltway pol)/Romney (a double-talking socialist) were to win the WH, in the end, they are just more of the same (maybe slow the train – but it will still go off the same cliff).

      Yes, we do need to be praying to the Living God, to forgive us for our individual sins, our national sins (removing Jesus Christ/Word of God from society, for abortion, rampant sexual immorality, electing wicked leaders), & perhaps maybe He’ll turn from His coming judgment of this nation.

      2 Chronicles 7:14: if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

      When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn. – Proverbs 29:2
      Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, But such as keep the law contend with them. – Pro 28:4

      Report Post »  
    • Luke21
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:19am

      @Miami,

      Newt’s actions belie his words. He has a historical pattern of saying one thing & doing another (e.g. his ties to fannie/freddie, his Global Warming spots, multiple affairs, etc, etc.). He cannot be trusted. He knows exactly what to say – what conservatives/TEA partiers/Christians, etc want to hear, – but he’s a serpent, don’t be fooled.

      Report Post »  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:54am

      That was a rather shallow run down, eh?

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • espiegle
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:06am

      you base all your statements on “looks” is that how you vote? because we see how that worked out in 2008.

      Report Post »  
    • AhLeahIris
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:08am

      You’ve got that just about right. Seems like we’ll be stuck with a progressive: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1FO

      Report Post » AhLeahIris  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:12am

      21

      Did you even hear what he said in the Nancy ad..?

      Or did you just block off after seeing him on the same screen as her?

      The Ad was made in early 2008 which was before anyone new about the scam the “scientist ” were running. He countered AL Gores testimony in congress, if anything he lobbied against the cap and trade bill.

      As he had put it we can be part of the conversation or we can be drowned out by the liberal medial and progressive political maneuverings. I don’t know about you but I rather take part in the debate than be left out.

      You speak of actions and he has taken action to fight against Obama care, he was leading the house that stopped Hillary care, welfare reform, Medicare reform, balance government budgets four times that left the country with a positive balance that could have been used to pay down the debt.

      Regardless he cannot pass any law that is not presented to him which is why we must fight to regain the senate and build on the gains in the house.

      Do you really believe he would veto a conservative reform bill?

      Report Post » Miami  
    • bhohater
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:30am

      I agree, this election was over before it began. Republicans can’t overcome the huge “stupid factor” in this country. All Obummer has to do to win is stay alive—and on vacation. I’ve given up on Sickle Cell, but still holding out hope that he’ll slip on a well placed camouflaged banana peel while skipping down the ramp of Air Force One.

      Report Post » bhohater  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:45am

      bhohater

      You mean like allowing the Iranians to capture Drone in next to perfect condition after having the opportunity to retrieve it or destroy it and did nothing.

      Report Post » Miami  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:53am

      Government is NOT a business, and shouldn’t be run as such:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq0kv4n5Yfs

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:06am

      There are many reasons that Beck is anti-Gingrich, and Blaze readers would be wise to do their homework and find out why!

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:14am

      If you want to know why Beck dislikes Gingrich so much, just take a glance at this Australian site re: Newt

      http://www.newtexposed.com/

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:19am

      If you like Newt, then you like the Tofflers. Do you even know who they are?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=moFsABsJNL4#t=23s

      Report Post »  
    • sawbuck
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:33am

      @libs
      I agree ..Where toast…!
      When Obo drops Biden and puts Hillary in the VP seat, the “trailer dweller”
      will be think‘n Hillary 2016’
      It’s over and they know it…!

      Lets see…Another two feet deeper , in my bunker ,ought a do it ..!

      Report Post » sawbuck  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:17pm

      5. Ron Paul. Too old. Squeaky voice. Too bald. His son has a poodle sleeping on his punkin head. Are you kidding? That’s why your not voting for him? I don’t care if the guy is 4 feet tall, green and has red hair. As long as he says what I want to hear.

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:19pm

      @Miami – People knew about that scam in 2001. And Newt knew it was a scam. He banked off it.

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:24pm

      Open prayer for the election of Godly leaders:

      “Father, I desire to vote intelligently in all elections. I pray that You will bring to light the things I need to know so I may vote in line with your plan, will and purpose. May things not only come to light for the Christian community, but may things be made clear to the unbelieving community as well. I pray that what is right would be so clear that even unbelievers would vote using wisdom and demanding honesty and uprightness from their politicians. Dear Father, in the name of Jesus, may the citizens of our nation become so weary of sin and degradation in our nation’s leaders that they will begin to seek out godly leaders to represent them on every level of government. Give such leaders favor with the public and the media.”

      Luke 12:1-3
      John 16:13
      ..

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:34pm

      I’ve been looking at the Gallup daily polls and the RCP average nationally. I think Gingrich has peaked. He was 37% on the 6th and now down to 33% today. He’s on the downside of the curve now. This trend should put him in the high 20′s by the end of next week. Flavor of the week, gone just like the rest.

      It’s time to look at Ron Paul and Mitt Romney for the Presidency. They’re the only 2 standing. Both can defeat Obama, so say national polls.

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:56pm

      @bhohater
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:30am
      I agree, this election was over before it began. Republicans can’t overcome the huge “stupid factor” in this country. All Obummer has to do to win is stay alive—and on vacation. I’ve given up on Sickle Cell, but still holding out hope that he’ll slip on a well placed camouflaged banana peel while skipping down the ramp of Air Force One
      *****
      This election was only over before it began in the eyes of the ‘king makers’ in the lsm and the republican party. We don’t yet have a “NewStates Constitution” (Google it) and { ARE } under our US Constitution, when a Presidential term is 4 yrs, (Not 9 see above) AND THE PEOPLE NOT THE GOVERNMENT ELITE HAVE THE FINAL SAY!
      So put up your polls, your columns by the elites and turn of the lsm, We haven’t yet begun the primaries, AND LIKE MARK LEVIN SAID, ” IF THE CONTEST IS BETWEEN OBAMA & A DOORKNOB, I’LL” (ME TOO & MILLIONS OTHERS) “VOTE FOR THE DOORKNOB!” Millions of dems who love their country, and independents who love their country are with us there, SO: SMILE, PRAY FOR YOUR NATION, THEN GO ON KNOWING THERE STILL IS A GOD, AND { HE HASN’T CEDED CONTROL OF THE UNIVERSE TO ANYONE INCLUDING THE CABAL FOR AGENDA 21!!! }

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:37pm

      @sawbuck
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:33am
      @libs
      I agree ..Where toast…!
      When Obo drops Biden and puts Hillary in the VP seat, the “trailer dweller”
      will be think‘n Hillary 2016’
      It’s over and they know it…!
      ***
      Biden‘s b o ’s Life insurance policy, he knows the conservatives DON’T WANT AN IDIOT LIKE BIDEN, MORE THAN THEY DON’T WANT HIM! (And believes ALL conservatives are assassins awaiting the proper OPPURTUNITY.) If he’d drop biden and replace him with hillary, NO INSURANCE COMPANY OR CASINO, OR EVEN NY OR CHICAGO BOOKIE would EVER take the risk of giving Him LIFE INSURANCE!!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • rslamd
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:01pm

      Ron Paul has some good ideas and I hope several are taken to heart. However his foreign policy is the last thing we need. Of what is left even with all of his baggage Newt has the best record of accomplishments and working with members of the other party to get things done for this country. We have go to get Obama and at least 13 Democratic Senators of the 26 up for re-election out of office and hold the House. That has to be the goal of all republicans. We cannot go with a third party because that will mean Obama wins again. I am not a Newt fan…I prefered Herman Cain but this is what is best for the country.

      Report Post » rslamd  
    • Clara88
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:39pm

      Please support Gov Rick Perry for President…a conservative AND a veteran..GOD BLESS
      http://www.rickperry.org/

      Gov. Rick Perry…

      “The idea this president now, with Iran getting one of our predator drones in their possession, and he had opportunities — he had two choices. Actually, he had three. He chose the worse. And those two opportunities he had was to either retrieve that drone or to destroy it. And he did the worst of the three. And he did absolutely nothing. And the Russians and the Chinese will have our highly technical equipment now. This president IS the problem,” Perry said at the ABC News debate in Des Moines, Iowa

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • ramburner
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:55pm

      Does this country have any REAL issues? Is this election about looks and sounds? These republicrats have taken topics off message, driven by the media. Let us get back to the REAL ISSUES of the day, rather than follow the media driven crap that leads us like high school sheep! Perry, Newt and Romney ARE NOT the man! Newt is a polished Romney in sheep’s clothing. He is really a democrat. Why do you think they are surging in the polls? Why are the media pushing all that they say? Something is NOT right when the media are actively promoting their message and slamming Bachmann and Santorum. The media finally wore a hole in Cain and he burst! WAKE UP America! If we elect Newt or Romney or Perry, we get Obama light! Whatever the media is doing, RUN the other way! We will only have this last chance to elect someone who will even try to bring us back to where we were before Wilson and FDR. Other than Potus; the 2012 election is a good time to clean house and get rid of ALL the Progressives in each party! Don’t know who they are? Then use this rule of thumb; if they have been in office for more than 2 terms – GET RID OF THEM! We MUST have Term Limits in order to keep this problem at bay and controllable in the future; otherwise this country is lost! Research the Candidates background on the web BEFORE voting. If they have voted for Progressive laws and pushed Progressive policies; chances are – THEY ARE PROGRESSIVE! Return to God and the Constitution.

      Report Post »  
    • Clara88
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:13pm

      Veterans are supporting a VETERAN….Gov Rick Perry
      Our military deserves a Commander In Chief they can be PROUD of and RESPECT
      GOD BLESS OUR BRAVE MILITARY AND OUR BELOVED BRAVE VETERANS
      http://www.rickperry.org/veterans/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • jzs
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:12pm

      LIBS-ARE-DINGLEHEADS says, “PRAY that Obummer has a massive stroke.“ Frankly you sound like a ”lib” but assuming you’re not, I doubt God much appreciates or acts on prayers to kill people. I guess if God wanted to kill someone He/She could do that easily enough. I don’t imagine He takes a poll of who wants to kill whom and then acts on the majority vote.

      Okay, you were kidding. But your assessment is decent although I could probably add a few additional negatives if I were of that mind.

      Mostly though, I want to offer, as a liberal, my sincere condolences to Tea Party members. Your guys, Santorum, Palin, Trump don‘t have a chance and haven’t really ever had a chance. Ron Paul doesn‘t have a chance although I think he’s the most decent and honest man in politics today. I don‘t agree with him on many things but I’d trust him with my life.

      Sorry, you’re stuck with Romney or Gingrich. You have my heartfelt and sincere condolences.

      Report Post » jzs  
  • The Third Archon
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:34am

    “GINGRICH TO ROMNEY: THE ONLY REASON YOU DIDN’T BECOME A CAREER POLITICIAN IS BECAUSE YOU LOST TO TED KENNEDY IN 94″
    …says the career politician…?

    Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:37am

      Ron Paul is way ahead in all the polls I have seen so far on who won the debate. He has more support than any of you Progressives here on the Blaze want to admit. He will win. Ron Paul 2012.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • burnteye86
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:12am

      I was starting to lean toward Ron Paul a couple years ago, then I started listening closer to him and his supporters and they reminded me of The Borg.

      burnteye86  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:22am

      The Blaze, Progressive?

      Now THAT is COMEDY, my friend.

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • cao
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:57am

      LOL…pot. kettle. black.

      Report Post » cao  
    • Love_John_Galt
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:24am

      Ron Paul is awesome! It’s hard to argue with his consistent stance on the Constitution.

      If all politicians honored their oath to uphold the Constitution our country would not be on the brink of collapse right now.

      The poll numbers show people are tired of these guys making up the rules as they go along!
      Judge a man on his proven principles – not his ‘promises’.

      Report Post » Love_John_Galt  
    • Emrys
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:46am

      I LOVED it! I‘ve been saying it for months to my television every time Romney says he’s an outsider. It ain’t for lack of trying! He just keeps losing most of the elections he runs for, including Senator and President last time around. He’d Love to be in power, but he just can’t win often enough. Newt said it right after I said it for the umpteenth time to the t.v. About time someone called Romney on that.

      Report Post »  
    • Duddio
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:45am

      Emrys,
      That’s one of the things I love about Newt. He says things no other politician will say, but that a lot of us are feeling, and he does it with a smile and flair. The stuttering of Mitt Romney, “Mr. Composure” after Newt’s quip was priceless.
      Newt’s invented Palestinians, for example, I wondered 20 years ago why a nation and people group that didn‘t exist historically was bombing Israel for something that wasn’t theirs. I love that Newt isn’t afraid to point that out. The land of Palestine under the Roman Empire was known as the “region of the Jews.“ The ”Palestinians” in the West Bank and Gaza are displaced Jordanians that the Arab world uses as a foil against Israel. Anger should be directed at Jordan for not welcoming them and settling them, but that wouldn’t help the agenda.

      Report Post »  
  • moonpeace
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:29am

    @mad_hatter_
    You’ll see! Watch all the conservatives run to support whichever candidate is decided upon…Romney, Gingrich, whoever…either of them is better that Obama. My God, can you see our debt and unemployment after another four years of the current borrow-and-spend-now administration? Another four years will bring fighting in the streets. Things might look bad now, but four more could be our end.

    Report Post » moonpeace  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:35am

      So let’s put Newt or Mitt in and have the worse come, what, a couple years farther down the road than what Obama would do?? No thank you.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • blue_sky
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:43am

      Newt Gingrich is good as a history tenured professor, but he sucks as a person who claims to be a conservative.

      Newly found facts expose how Newt lied about Reagan.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCQCsugd0h8

      (Send to all Newt’s supporters)
      .

      Report Post »  
    • EM1956
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:11am

      Frankly, I look forward to more fighting in the streets, there are many liberal enemy that need to be utterly destroyed. LET’S ROLL!

      Report Post » EM1956  
    • aLinedog
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:51am

      West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:35am
      “So let’s put Newt or Mitt in and have the worse come, what, a couple years farther down the road than what Obama would do?? No thank you.”

      I agree, however Mr. Paul has some views on Foreign policy that are simply untenable. That being said, those views are so ‘out there’ that he’d meet resistance left and right -no pun intended. So, how much harm could he do -when compared to his Constitutionalist convictions it’d clearly be a net gain.
      Moot Point: The lame-stream would bar-b-que him, and post-primary he’d quickly become unelectable. -Line

      EM1956
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:11am
      “Frankly, I look forward to more fighting in the streets, there are many liberal enemy that need to be utterly destroyed. LET’S ROLL! ”
      You have no idea the utter misery and fatal uncertainty that would bring to the future of our Republic.
      -line

      Report Post »  
  • ProudTeaPartyMember
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:32am

    Wow, can Newt hit the nail on the head.

    Report Post » ProudTeaPartyMember  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:41am

      I can just see him play with Zero

      Report Post » Miami  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:43am

      Zero’s stutters will kick into overdrive,

      Report Post » Miami  
  • SHOWMESTATEGUY
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:00am

    Anyone but BO. I hope after the primaries we all coalesce around the Republican candidate. For the future of the country BO must GO.

    Report Post »  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:17am

      Totally agree

      Report Post » Miami  
    • mad_hatter_
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:23am

      Why is it that we forget history. Why is it that we let the media choose our candidate? What we forget about Massachusetts is that Romney turned around the economy there by over $5 billion dollars ($3 billion deficit to a $2 billion rainy day fund). He did this without raising any taxes and fighting to lower taxes every year. Yes he did make people, who were asking for state services, to pay their own way instead of the tax-payers paying for them, these are called fees (payment for services rendered by the govt to individuals, should not be subsidized by taxpayer funding), and these were only done after spending was cut by each department. They forget that Romney dissolved two whole state agencies and shrunk many more, laying off hundreds of govt workers, which cut hundreds of millions. Also turned around the Olympics and then returned to Bain Capitol, the company he stated, to fix it because it turn for the worse after he left. He turned it around and made it thrive once more, all for a salary of $1.

      The Tea Party, which I belong to, started one group in Alaska and one in NY, is all about shrinking govt overreach, cutting spending, cutting taxes, and getting the govt out of our lives, Romney did this many times over, more than any other candidate. And if you remember, Romney’s health care plan was all about deregulating the insurance industry, making it easier on the people to buy, cutting the $1.3 billion paid to free loaders. This is why Romney is so needed right now!

      Report Post »  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:56am

      Mad, If you were real Tea, you would vote for the only Tea candidate on stage, Ron Paul. You might be able to get away with putting Michele or Santorum in that category, but Paul is the one who started Tea. All the others are Progressives. If you vote Progressive, you are against everything the Tea is for. Wake up. Ron Paul 2012.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:55am

      I support this man’s/person’s (the OP) comment.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:13pm

      This IS TOO IMPORTANT!! We know BHO will not be re-elected. No one has the independant vote like Ron Paul. Even many of the OWS crowd will support Ron Paul because he all about ending the FED (the godfather of banks and the banking industry as it is) and putting an end to the progressive agenda all together. No big government agency will survive his presidency and the people will be untethered by any U.N. influence or demands on our society.

      We have to get it RIGHT THIS TIME!! We cannot afford to elect a progressive again. Ron paul is the only one on the stage that is not a progressive stooge. Ron Paul is the REASON there is a TEA PARTY!!! It started with him and it will succeed with with him not because he has some pie in the sky plan. He will win because he uses the CONSTITUTION as his playbook and would die for those principals that originated with the founders of our great nation!.

      WAKE UP!!!

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:18pm

      @West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:56am
      Mad, If you were real Tea, you would vote for the only Tea candidate on stage, Ron Paul. You might be able to get away with putting Michele or Santorum in that category, but Paul is the one who started Tea. All the others are Progressives. If you vote Progressive, you are against everything the Tea is for. Wake up. Ron Paul 2012
      ****
      Okay, let’s point out the difference between TEA and TEA PARTY, Taxed Enough Already, wasn’t started by either Ron Paul, or any OTHER Candidate. It was the agenda spelled out in the Declaration of Independence, and BEFORE THAT, EVERYWHERE COLONISTS MET TO DISCUSS THERE LOT IN DEALING WITH THE ENGLISH CROWN (Dutch, French, Spanish, or ANY OTHER MONARCHY which would attempt to rule over this land.) The TEA PARTY was started BY A GROUP OF COLONISTS, (disodents or activists in todays parlayance.) IN BOSTON HARBOR, BEFORE THE DECLARATION WAS WRITTEN! Ron Paul, and his ilk, have tapped into the STATE OF HEART, WHICH WAS BORN INTO EACH SUBSEQUENT GENERATION OF AMERICANS, BUT SO HAVE MICHELLE BACHMANN, RICK SANTORUM, RICK PERRY, AND HERMAN CAIN, AND “NEWT ROMNEY” IS TRYING HARD! (Maybe if they’re really progressives, before this is over, they’ll progress to actually achieve this state of heart, we CAN keep on praying!)
      Maybe NOT QUITE ABO, but BO must GO, ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE CABAL, AND TOTUS, THE Grand Puppeteer!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • marion
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:34am

    Listen to yourselves sometimes. First you complain the person doesn’t have enough political experience to become President, then you turn around and say a person has too much experience, so which is it?

    Newt was in when things worked, he mentions them all the time, and when he wasn’t in, well, thing went bad. Seems his experience was a good thing, his private sector time was conservative organizational work groups and institution work, along with his consulting business (whatever it is), so even though he was in the know (as any good retired military person is [I know]), he wasn’t responsible for the bad times, just personal comments, of which reflection is, he pretty much had it right more times than not.

    He may be bloviating at times, but truth of the matter is, isn’t that what we are missing right now???

    Report Post »  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:57am

      That’s how I see it

      Report Post » Miami  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:36pm

      We are missing a consistant conservative constitutionalist. We are, and have been missing a president that understands the intent of our founders! One that uses the constitution as his authorization and guide! We are missing a true uncorruptable patriot in the office of the POTUS!

      I believe the person we are all looking for is Ron Paul!!

      WAKE UP!!

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
  • RonPaul
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:24am

    Here is the Ron Paul coverage that you probably won’t see the Blaze posting.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTfu2g-8RtE

    Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:51am

      Watch Saint Paul aka Lew Rockwell lie
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKBlk1Vpeuw

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • YepImaConservative
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:28am

      > REPUBLICORP. Paul supporters will never talk about Paul‘s connection to Lew Rockwell as they know it will be devestating to Paul’s advancing forward in the nomination process if it’s widely known and researched. Anyone who supports Ron Paul knowing his long time personal and political relationship with Rockwell and STILL supports Paul IMO deserves to be marginalized and mocked. Which I like to do to them often. Paul supporters right after Obama supporters are the most disingenous of human beings walking the planet and should be treated as mere clowns and court jesters which they excel at. Not to be taken seriously, but fun to watch.

      Report Post » YepImaConservative  
  • Eric Simpson
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:13am

    Pandering Romney took the Democratic line on the moon issue. The entitlements have sucked up all the $, and relatively few are needed, that could get us back to the moon. There are natl security, industrial & inspirational reasons to go back, and Obama stopped the plan in its tracks. Newt is right on this. Shame on Romney.

    Also, see China will Own the Moon by 2026: http://digitaljournal.com/article/313103

    Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter_
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:16am

      So he is also right about the huge mirrors in space in order to save us from Global Warming. It’s in his book. Romney is right about not saying stupid things outloud, its called tact and you need it to be President. You need to know when to say something and when to keep your mouth shut, Perry learned that one with “you don’t have a heart.”

      Report Post »  
  • bolsen00
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:32am

    Gingrich’s statement was pure Gingrich ugliness! That’s the louse that everyone in Washington hates and everyone else in the country too! We’re tired of his mouth! He’s just some old geezer looking down on everyone else as younger and stupid so he justifies saying anything thoughtless and irresponsible! Romney is still the frontrunner against Obama…not newt!

    Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:37am

      Sctually Dr Ron Paul is the front runner.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • mad_hatter_
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:49am

      Romney in the polls is still the front runner in the independents category. Gingrich is in the Republican Party, because they are still learning about him. And against Obama, Romney is the front runner and it is all because of his conservative history that is in a reply to the post below, the long one that states his history.

      And about RomneyCare, people forget that it was mandating potential freeloaders to buy private insurance not government insurance, like ObamaCare. It was to deregulate the insurance industry and to get people covered. It is about States rights, which we have no say in because we do not live in Massachusetts and 63% of them support it. Sadly Romney’s original mandate was not held, which was libertarian in nature: “Buy insurance or pay your own bill.’ Getting the govt out of the business, that is Ron Paul’s stance and according to Heritage, before the bill was even passed, was the original intent. Remember that the Dems made huge changes and Romney vetoed 7 whole sections of the bill, just to have the legislature override his veto. Even those parts that hurt businesses which Romney didn’t want to do.

      THIS IS WHY THE TEA PARTY ARE STARTING TO SUPPORT ROMNEY (The Tea Party Caucus is supporting him more than any other candidate) , THEY ARE WISING UP ABOUT GINGRICH.

      Report Post »  
    • marion
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:14am

      Once again, the truth, had not the result been told, would be a true statement. Since Romney did lose to Kennedy he was not a politician over the past 17 years. It‘s kind of one of those facts that is one reason he probably isn’t more electable than the other candidates and why his numbers remain a constant flat 20ish percent. It‘s not that Romney doesn’t try, he just can’t come through in a pinch.

      Believe it or not, this is the kind of thinking that makes Newt actually appealing. Each time a Liberal or Progressive turns around and lies about something, Newt will point out the truth to clear the issue up once and for all. Pick a topic, whether it is global warming, EPA rules and regulations, Palestinians wannabes, or the payroll tax cuts, I am sure he can explain what the results of doing one thing over another will result in.

      Report Post »  
    • Todd P
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:12am

      I think either of these two would make excellent presidents – and BHO has got to go! They all got in their respective zingers. But at the end of the day, polls show that Newt trails BHO while Mitt is beating him. That may be something worth considering.

      Report Post »  
    • Todd P
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:20am

      I think either of these two would make an excellent president, and BHO has got to go! But Mitt is leading BHO in the national polls, while Newt is trailing him. That just may be something worth considering.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:08pm

      Bachmann isn’t as conservative as most think:

      She co-sponsored pro-Union bill HR 980 (http://www.thefreemanonline.org/colu…-union-bosses/).

      In 2005, as a State Senator in Minnesota, she broke her No-Tax Pledge to the Taxpayers’ League of Minnesota by voting YES to a $400 million dollar tobacco tax.

      In that same year, she voted to double the ethanol content of Minnesota’s gasoline from 10% to 20%.

      Voted YES to the $192 Billion “Anti-Recession Stimulus Bill” in July 2009.

      The most ironic aspect of Michelle Bachmann has to be the fact that she prosecuted tax payers on behalf of the IRS

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:28pm

      The TRUTH HEARTS! but people who really LOVE others, LOVE THEM ENOUGH TO BE HONEST WITH THEM, SO THEY CAN DO SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE INSTEAD OF LIVING THEIR LIES, AND KILLING OTHERS BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE THEM!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 6:54pm

      re : Gingrich looking down his nose at…

      Come On now! Every picture you see of b o, he’s either Literally looking down his nose at people, or staring up toward the Heavens, Gingrich, at least, speaks Real People, without putting the people who made this nation great down as stupid, selfish, fools, and biggoted blundering idiots. In camparison, Gingrich IS THE REAL THING!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:09pm

      You Newt Gingrich is a real PROGRESSIVE, LIAR, WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING!! He is a professional fluffer. He will send a blast of hot air up your backside and make you feel like he’s on your side then turns around and does what he feels is in his best interest and says “You don’t know whats good for you“ ”The way I see it”. He is only in it for the money and POWER! This backstabing progressive represents everything that is wrong in this government right now! Why would you consider continuing this hypocracy!

      WAKE UP!!

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
  • brian8793
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:19am

    Fat-freaking 2 time adulterer, and that’s all we know for sure. HOW CAN YOU GUYS SUPPORT THIS SHMUCK?

    Please! I’m begging you not to throw it away because you hate Mormons. It’s not worth it!

    Report Post » brian8793  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:25am

      Never will I vote for either schmuck…It says someting about you when you belong to a cult. It shows you are misguided for one, for two it shows the bigger the lie the more you will believe it and for three it shows he is a follower

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:27am

      It‘s not about Romney’s religion, it’s about his record. How can you not see that him and Newt are the same? It‘s just like everyone understanding that we shouldn’t regulate food choices or control people’s lives, but then turn around and support the Patriot act like Bachmann, Santorum, and Newt.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:30am

      honestly man, if paul doesn’t get the nomination, i think i am going to leave. everyone else sounds exactly the same to me. we are on the precipice of complete disaster. financially, morally and our liberty is being infringed upon in very ostentatious ways. they are flaunting their utter disdain for US AS AMERICAN CITIZENS openly.

      people need to wake up or they will find themselves in a very dire situation in the near future.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:32am

      The Patriot act was 2000 pages long, but we are supposed to believe that it was put together in one week after 9/11? They were waiting for the opportunity to use fear to spring it on us. The only time american’s would be so blinded by fear to give up our liberty to do as we wish so that the government could grab our crotches. Big Government is now in control.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • mottdahoop
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:38am

      How quaint. You are assuming our lack of support for Romney is simply because he is Mormon?

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter_
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:41am

      I disagree completely that you hate Mormon‘s if you don’t vote for Romney, some may, but that is not the reason for not voting for Romney, its because of, and I say this respectfully, ignorance. They forget that in Massachusetts, Romney turned around the economy there by over $5 billion dollars ($3 billion deficit to a $2 billion rainy day fund). He did this without raising any taxes and fighting to lower taxes every year. Yes he did make people asking for the state for services to pay their own way instead of the tax-payers paying for them, these are called fees, and these were only done after spending was cut in each department. They forget that Romney dissolved two whole state agencies and shrunk many more, laying off hundreds of govt workers. He also turned around the Olympics and then returned to Bain Capitol, the company he stated to fix it because it turn for the worse after he left. He turned it around and made it thrive once more, all for a salary of $1.

      The Tea Party, which I belong to, started one group in Alaska and one in NY, is all about shrinking govt overreach, cutting spending, cutting taxes, and getting the govt out of our lives, Romney did this many times over, more than any other candidate. And if you remember, Romney;s health care plan was all out deregulating the insurance industry and making it easier on the people, and cutting the $1.3 billion paid to free loaders. This is why Romney is so needed for our economy.

      Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:53am

      @bradley
      Dear Patriot and fellow American,
      Remeber this: Dr Ron Paul is the front runner…The media has perfected the art of manipulating the American people for many years, it is called psyops ( psychological operations) they have been using ALL forms of this warfare to control us, The American people are finally waking up to this for one reason, that reason is the internet, They no longer have a complete stranglehold on the American people, remember most people have been trained all their life to completely believe everything they are told through the msm. This is changing, it is a slow process but everday more and more people are realizing for the first time that they have been lied too and decieved for so long, that is why Dr Ron Paul has garnered more and more support, When people really find out who he is and what he stands for they decide to throw off the shackles of slavery and ignorance.THIS is why the msm and establishment blacklist him, He is the only one that is a threat to the almost complete control the government has on WE THE PEOPLE, They know psycholigy and it is true that if you tell a lie long enough the people will believe it, We are fighting a war against this, WE THE PEOPLE only have eachother, they have unlimited money, all the mainstream media, establishment liberals and rinos and politicians that have betrayed us and not kept their oath of office, ?We will only get stronger as long as we are willing to fight these treasonist terrorists with truth!

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • marion
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:26am

      It takes two to make a marriage work. And it has absolutely nothing to do with being a Mormon, it has to do with the fact that after watching politicians for the past 20 years or so, I saw President Obama speak at his acceptance speech for senator, and after listening to him for five minutes, I walked to the kitchen to get another cup of coffee and said to myself, OK, I liked half the speech and I kind of disagreed with half but what did he say. what was he representing? At that point, without knowing anything else, I knew he was just hot air.

      You have to ask yourself, do you disown your friends and family which have had a divorce? Would that disqualify a person from being a good person, or in this case, not only run the country better than it has been over the past three years, but actually bring us back? Newt has been in the position over the past 25 years during the better times over the past 25 years, and not there during the bad parts of the last 25 years. I can see a whole lot better time with Newt over President Obama, and on top of that I think Barry is afraid of him because Newt will call him on his attacks, Mitt won’t know how to, not in his DNA.

      Report Post »  
    • thefnshow
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:24am

      how could people vote for bill clinton with cheating multiple times and having a rape charge levied against him,people gave him a second term…oh wait ,he’s a democrat so that makes it ok…i forgot silly me

      Report Post » thefnshow  
  • brian8793
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:17am

    Don’t you guys know that the Libs want Gingrich to get the nomination? CBS is Liberal, and they were ALL OVER GINGRICH’S NUTS TONIGHT.

    Nominate Romney or suffer another 4 years of Barry the socialist. His next four years aren’t going to be as “pretty” I assure you. I’m an athiest btw, and I’m still scared s#!tless by what he will do.

    ROMNEY 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Report Post » brian8793  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:22am

      Notice how not one word in post debate about Paul who is polling 2nd in Iowa???? Maybe that should tell you who the big government liberal media is really afraid of. You are right on, they are pushing Newt first, Perry second, would push Huntsman more but everyone has him pegged, would push Bachmann but they know she can’t win the general election, and are trying to act like they aren’t for Romney, all the while always talking about him.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:28am

      We know that, what we dont know is how many times your mom slammed your head into the floor? She must have been playing wack a mole with you, because your the only one here that can’t figure out there is no difference between them.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:52pm

      @jmiller
      My last post was to brian not to you.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
  • freejan1776
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:15am

    That whole thing with Pelosi threatening to expose Newt was pure theater. He probably asked her to do it to distance himself from her. So many people are so easily fooled. Please! Please! Pray before you making a choice on who you will vote for.

    Report Post »  
  • snowdrop
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:09am

    I like some of Ron Paul’s views, but you can’t just forget about the rest of the world. With his policy we would have ignored Hitler and let him murder all the Jews and rule half the world.

    Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:18am

      With the other’s foreign policy we would be broke and Hitler would rule the WHOLE WORLD! Your fear tactics are so juvenile. Jesus taught us to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. That is all Paul is trying to implement. We should not treat anyone else how we would not want to be treated. What is so wrong with that?

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • batteredyoungpatriot
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:19am

      we did ignore Hitler. after WW1 America took an isolationist stance towards the world. That was how we became so prosperous. During WWII we maintained that isolationist stance til nearly the end of the war, and we only joined in WWII because we were directly attacked. This is why we were in the position we were to rebuild almost all of Europe after the war was over. Which in turn lead to Europe becoming dependent on the united state for protection, so they used their money to fund giant and expensive positive rights for it’s people which is why they are in the mess they are in. Ron Paul just wants us to take our medicine, FINALLY. You don’t let a sick child not take his medicine just because it tastes bad, you force him to take it, because as the adult, you know that the short term mild unpleasantness far outweighs the consequences of not taking it. if we continue down this road and keep kicking the can and keep spending fake money that we don’t have we will never again have a prosperous and strong America.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:02am

      What the Paulbot don’t want you to know about Saint Paul
      http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:35pm

      Who’s Hitler? If you ask me, Obama looking more like a dictator day by day.

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
  • Kiba
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:50am

    This is a real conundrome (idoubt thats spelled right but dont really care) on one hand everyone is saying “we dont want a career politician” anywhere anymore but when you put someone somewhere that doesnt have any knowledge we get someone like Obama who doesnt know his a$$ from a hole in the ground. And I hate to be the one to break it to some of you but 99% of the non-politician tea-party people that made it to D.C. (that I happen to like) are messin a lot of stuff up because unlike they thought they cant just jump-in-there and all of a sudden straighten a 100 yr. old mess out that easy either. Yes Newt has been there for awhile but he hasnt really been in elected office for how long now? He has made mistakes and Im sure he has learned from them, how do you think he went up so fast? Because he knows what he’s doing thats why, in the debates when they were all going after eachother like kids fighting over a girl he knew better than to get involved in it, and when he did attack someone it was either the media or Obama. People (like myself) was getting tired of seeing that crap all of the time, and its the desperate and scared look they are all getting on their faces now a days since they apperantly started figuring out they aint gonna win. First it was that Pawlenty “look” he started getting just before he hit the bricks, Santorum has always had that look and I can see it in Huntsmans eyes too altho he’s better at hiding it than some and now Bachmann is getting it. &

    Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:58am

      There is nothing wrong with a career politician IF he votes 100% percent of the time with the Constitution and He serves WE THE PEOPLE. Only Dr Ron Paul has done that and is Qualified for the office of the President.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:06am

      Ron Paul is that consistency you are looking for. He has schooled us all on the Fed, and it won’t be long until we realize the golden rule is the best foreign policy as well.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
  • Miami
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:46am

    Newt is right

    The truth has no agenda

    Report Post » Miami  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:55am

      that was low class. but, i guess that’s what newt is all about huh? i can’t beieve people actually fell for this charlatan.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • brian8793
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:12am

      If you guys nominate Gingrich, I’m done with The Repubes. I’m done with politics. If you elect this CAREER POLITICIAN, you guys are brain-freakin-dead, or anti-Mormon. Either way, I‘m done if Romney doesn’t get the nod. Obama will spank Gingrich.

      Report Post » brian8793  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:19am

      ROMNEY? sir, ron paul is the only GOP candidate worth a damn.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • brian8793
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:22am

      Um Bradley sir, you don‘t understand that it’s going to either be a choice between Newt and Mitt? Did you miss something? You not up on the news here?

      I love Ron Paul too. This Country isn’t smart enough to elect him. So let’s make the best choice with what we are givin, like real men do when they HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE.

      Report Post » brian8793  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:36am

      @brian
      You have three problems..the first one can’t be fixed, and that is you have very low intelligence, Second problem is you actually believe the news , that shows you dont use your brain to think you let them think for you and third problem you have is that you don‘t know the Constitution and you don’ t know history..without them two things you might as well go vote for obamma again because romney is no different. AND SINCE YOU THINK HE IS tell us where he is different? Other than he is white.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:53am

      Br@dley

      Yes and repeating the Liberal myth about his Xwife in the hospital isa what…? All you have to do is listen to the truth his daughters said back then, His wife had filed for divorce but go ahead and be a good little minion. It’s just what the left wants.;..!

      Report Post » Miami  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:13am

      brian8793

      Mitt has been on the left of most of these issues by signing and lobbying for them. Newt has had conversations but when its has come to brass tax he has pushed for the right answer and gotten results.

      While I agree with Paul’s financial vision and position on the Fed, I even agree with recalling many of our bases but not all as he does. The world is not the world he would like it to be or believes it is. No matter what we do Islamist will try to convert or kill us, it’s written into their faith and nothing we say or do will change that. Paul does not understand that or refuses to believe it.

      Do you really believe that Newt would veto any conservative Bill that came before him?

      What we must concentrate on is expanding the gains in the House and taking control of the Senate.

      As for not voting for Newt or Mitt, you might as well vote for Zero, at best Paull would get 10 to 15% in a third party run handing the race to Zero…!

      Wet Dog

      Report Post » Miami  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:05am

      Talking about charlatans
      http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
  • A Conservatarian
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:45am

    LMAO! One career politician that had his career ended when the entire house was lost to the democrats on his watch, tells another politician why he’s not a career politician without explaining why he himself is no longer a career politician – but a commentator on Fox and a paid lackey for F-Mae and F-Mac. It’s official, Newt is hypocritical jack-ass. And please don’t take me as defending Romney, I’m voting Ron Paul. :-)

    Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:49am

      This whole story is pure distraction from the issues, Why don’t the mental mind midgets write a story on which canidate has actually kept his oath of office?

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:52am

      Conservatarian

      What’s that, a new liberal twist on language

      Report Post » Miami  
    • brian8793
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:14am

      Who cares if you’re defending Romney. What the hell is wrong with him?

      You have a problem with a business genius and a good family man?

      I bet you hate that he’s MORMON. Forget about f-n Ron Paul. You guys are insane about this anti-Romney anti-Mormon(my freakin fairy tale faith is better than your fairy tale faith crap)

      You guys want Obama to win? Doesn’t that put the fear of your “God” into you? IT SHOULD!

      Report Post » brian8793  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:29am

      Ooooo good one Miami such a zinger… liberal twist! Hah! Why didn’t I think of that?!
      No, I’ll tell you where the idea came from, your mother and myself were chatting in bed the other night… XD GFYS :D

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:35am

      Oh ya, the Romney thing… some of my good friends growing up were Mormon, went to a few of those mormon dances as a kid, some good times. Romney owned a company some of my family members worked for, I actually like the guy for what he’s done for my family and he has had benefit from the toil of those near me – good trade. As far as President, well, I do not agree with his stances. I have my own relationship with God. As far as the idea of God you are trying to communicate with me? As soon as you give me an acceptable definition of God we can have that discussion and if you don’t, then we don’t discuss God, fair?

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:19am

      Gee I guess I hit a nerve, my mom is eighty two so that makes you some kind of sicko, which fits right in with my first thought. You must be some kind of Liberal…

      Report Post » Miami  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:43am

      I see I got the reply I wanted. The thought crossed my mind that the person giving me crap about my awesome name, might have an aged or not alive mother; fortunately, yours is still alive :) My comment is only made all the more ridiculous in that case. C’mon throw some more liberal zingers at me, I’ll get even more ridiculous, though your liberal crap will get old the next time you use it up.

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:55am

      You framed yourself, I just call it as I see it

      Report Post » Miami  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:02am

      Yes and trumped your lame fun poking with the lamest of them all. You do kinda remind me of a kid that came by my house some 15 years ago stumping for a local campaigning tree-hugger (when I used to be a libertarian) that since I was a libertarian I should listen to him since liberal is like the word libertarian. I just laughed at the kid and shut the door in his face. At least I’m having fun with you, no?

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:35am

      A Conservatarian

      Sounds like you are having fun with yourself. I have no Idea how you’ve trumped my observation on your liberal interpretation of the language. Or you self diagnosed ridiculous fascination with octogenarian women which is disturbing to say the least. You speak of a kid who came to your door, when you’re the one making the elementary attack. All I can say is, does your mom know you are using her computer and what’s it like living in a basement…?

      Understanding how you all are, I’d bet it was you that had the door closed on his face…

      PS; You gave yourself away with txt-speak

      Report Post » Miami  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 4:04am

      I’m not trying to hide text speak, or age. Here’s another LOL cuz (oops another) that’s what I did when I read your comment. I am having fun with myself and I see you aren’t. Though you’re using an awful lot of big words there, I think I may be a little intimidated.

      But, my good $20-dollar-word-man, better to utilize speech, rather than use it I figure. I spoke of a kid that came to my door, because he took the libertarian word – much like you took a part of ATARIAN (from the epithet I thought up that mixes up the categorization of two concepts that blend well together in conservatism and libertarianism – think classical liberalism) – and made the quick equivocation based on similar spelling of libertARIAN and liberal OR if my epithet displeases you as a literal liberal usage of language and you used that pun to mud sling, ho-boy, that’s super low and no contest you win the petulant child award.

      Hence the figurative door shutting with ‘Your Mom’ joke since you were so childish on a conservative website to sling the usual ‘Liberal’ mud at me. As far as whatever you’re thinking about your mom and me? Stop, it was a joke. Annnnd as far as “I’d bet it was you that had the door closed on his face…”. Uh no, yet again you are so BIGTIME with your comebacks, seriously stop it already, you‘re killin’ me.

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:04am

      I’d qualify you as a proud Moron-atarian

      You can beat around your lack of class as long as you like but does not change the fact you behave like a childish liberal. Like a third grader who falls back to mother jokes. It sounds like you have alot of mommy issues. Grow up and get a life, oh yea take a bath….

      Report Post » Miami  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 5:33am

      Ok big boy. You were seriously asking me if my name was a liberal new twist in language? Academically, you were serious because you are so classy you don’t make idiotic or even dare I say, classless, jokes – ever. Further you have no clue what an epithet is or a cognomen. Yes. I see this is the case now and you are enjoying identifying what you consider is liberal and it‘s edifying when you pinpoint those rascally little liberals isn’t it!

      Wait wait wait, you weren’t being snide with me because I commented badly about your preferred candidate were you? Call the supporter of the candidate standing against your candidate a liberal “that’ll show him!”. Take a shower, goodness gracious me, like one of those stinking OWS liberals.

      You‘re one of the most banal folk I’ve run into on the blaze. Next time, don‘t start making fun of someone when you simply don’t like what they commented about, think up something better than calling them a liberal. Have you seen me call you a neo-con loving stinky douche? No. do I tell you that you should shower and stop backing your favorite pretenda-republican? No. But, I will tell a your mom joke when I see someone post something as stupid as you did about a nickname I thought up. Cuz “See, look I can do it too!”

      Oh please, oh please ask me if I’d jump off the bridge if my friend Miami jumped first.

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 7:52am

      Interesting use of a thesaurus, I don’t think the those words mean what you think they mean unless Conservatarian is actually your given name If so I can understand your mommy issues but truly you should just let it go. You can change your name legally once you turn 18.

      You just seem to be picking fights with people and making nonsensical statements that are not based in reality or fact but you seem to repeat what self indulgent talking heads keep regurgitating moronic talking points.
      You almost seem like one of those people who defend their cult flowing trying to rationalize the tin foil hat

      http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_E4nB9I9HSIw/ScB9TUnuoxI/AAAAAAAAAl0/Nk6zFToMDI0/s400/RonPaulTinFoilHat2.jpg
      Brother I wish you well and I will pray for you

      Report Post » Miami  
    • YepImaConservative
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 11:07am

      > CONSERVATARIAN. Anyone who supports Ron Paul is a Qausi-Conservative at best, Thrifty-Liberal at worst. A Libertarian (Libertine like Bill Maher) is not a Conservative and definately not a Republican (Ron Paul carpet bag’gng into the GOP). You might want to spin it thata’ way, but the fact is that Ron Paul and Ron Paul supporters (no matter what moniker they come up with) are 1/4 Conservative- 3/4 Liberal progressive. The economy is the only place Paul talks like a Conservative… somewhat (when he isn’t sounding like an Anarcho-Capitalist), but the rest of his platform is leftist and Liberal Progressive.

      Report Post » YepImaConservative  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:55pm

      See?! Look even YepImaNeoCon knows how to actually try to shoot down someone’s candidate with whys and what fors. He doesn‘t just stick to the point finger and say ’liberal’. Go ahead and pray for me, we all can use more of that. And yet again, you’re being so literal: an epithet can be a nickname, cognomens ditto and if you’re only looking at Ancient Roman history, where they constantly turned the foregoing into legal names, uh ya, you‘d be correct I’d have to change my actual name to Conservatarian. Do you think they had internet back then where people thought up epithets to use as screen names for an internet magazine – do you think they had to change their names legally to post? Strange questions come from improper assumptions,.

      YepImaNeoCon – why does Ron’s insistence on having only Congress declaring war not conservative? To have the constitution followed in all matters domestic but when it comes to foreign policy you drop the constitution and say he’s liberal? Ally with none and trade with all so conservative it’s founding father style. That Iran is not nearly the magnitude of a threat that Soviet Russia was, super liberal! Why is letting Israel have its sovereignty not conservative? Why is telling Israel they can fight for the borders they want; they can control their own foreign policy; they can punish those who attack them as they see fit all a liberal stance now? Nice try YepImaNeoCon, go play with Kaydee and sing war songs k? :)

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 2:38pm

      Truth is YepImaNeocon I‘ve seen other fellow Paul supporters put you in your place multiple times and I’ve done it myself. Go ahead, do the comeback… there, you did it. I’ve seen all your BS about Ron Paul, we all have, you don’t shut up ever about it. It always takes your usual format: assertion = truth. Sorry, don’t work that way sugarplum. You can’t substantiate one of your claims how Ron Paul ACTUALLY is not conservative without myself or other Paul supporters drilling you on your miss-use of comments, misunderstanding of what he said and many many many other little tricks of the neo-con trade. Kudos for actually bringing up Anarcho-Capitalism. Tell me all the benefits and drawbacks of that system over our current Fasci-Capitalism. Do tell me why you’re such a knob-slobber on the Keynesian Economics – you do realize Lord Keynes renounced his own economics in old age right? Soon enough you’ll come over to the Austrian Economist camp, oh ya, we‘re so liberal over here we wouldn’t allow the government to touch the market. Course your idea of conservatism is… who’s your candidate? Doesn’t matter, that candidate would allow government tampering with the market if it’s Romney, Perry (though Perry is quickly becoming a Paulbot), Gingrich, Santorum and if it’s Bachman well, for the patriot act are ya then? Good little laddy. And if you like Huntsman, well right on, though he has less of a shot than Paul by far.

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
  • Kangana
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:44am

    Pot. Kettle. Black.

    Report Post »  
  • DRSAVAGE24
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:38am

    Bachmann hit it right on the head: Newt Romney. There’s no real difference between the two. They’re both advocates for big government. Like Ron Paul said, do we really want to go through the campaign having a candidate who has to explain whether he’s for or against the individual health insurance mandate? We have a lot better choices in this race than Newt Romney. Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann…all clearly against government-run health care. Any of them would be better than the Newt Romney circus.

    What really separates Ron Paul from Michele Bachmann to me is the Patriot Act. She’s for it, he’s against it. The Patriot Act is a trampling of the 4th and 5th amendments of the constitution. Bachmann is willing to steal our liberty for the promise of keeping us safe. Our Founders warned against that. I’ll trust the Founders on this one. With all of the government power seized with the Patriot Act, who will protect us from the government when it becomes criminal? Some, like myself, would say our government is already criminal. And we want to trade our constitutional rights so our criminal government can protect us? That’s a joke. Next thing you know they’ll be scooping Tea Partiers off the street and hauling us to Gitmo without even seeing a judge because, after all, VP Biden said we’re “terrorists”. Careful about trampling others‘ rights because in doing so you’re jeopardizing your own.

    Report Post »  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:46am

      So, I’m listening to the song The Gael (The theme song from The Last of the Mohicans) and it’s some good theme music for your comment!

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:47am

      @DR
      I agree with you, I am a Dr Ron Paul supporter for the same reasons, I really like Michelle Bachmann but she is dead wrong on the unpatriot act, also Dr Ron Paul has educated alot of people on the danger and evil of the unfederal reserve, that and his 100% percent consistency on standing with the Constitution is why I will vote for him, with that being said she really is a classy, intelligent, and even attractive. I would not mind seeing her as vp undercDr Ron Paul, I do admit out of all of them Dr Ron Paul , Mrs. Bachmann and Mr. Santorum are alot better choices then newt romney.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:49am

      Facts and truth might make difference. Newt never sign or voted for a mandate nor did he lobby for it.

      Report Post » Miami  
    • I Love Freedom
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:54am

      @DR

      Well said sir! you nailed it

      Report Post » I Love Freedom  
    • DRSAVAGE24
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:59am

      @Miami: Newt’s problem is that he is not only very intelligent, he‘s very arrogant in that he thinks big government can work as long as it’s implemented by someone as brilliant as himself. When he was first accused of being for the individual mandate (either by Paul or Bachmann), he denied it. Then other candidates like Santorum chimed in agreeing with the accusation and Newt had to backpedal and admit to being for it back in 1993 because “all conservatives agreed” the individual mandate was the better alternative to Hillarycare. Santorum promptly stated that he was around back then, was a conservative, and was against the mandate. The facts are right there. Newt was in favor of the individual mandate before he was against it. Like I said, I don’t want to spend the next 11 months listening to Obama attack him on this and Newt having to explain himself. Will Bachman, Paul or Santorum have to explain such an inconsistency in their record on health care? I think not.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:08am

      Dr Savage,

      I wish there were a retweet button for that one. Brilliant points.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • garyM
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:18am

      You better brace yourself for one of them if you vote for the GOP because it will be Newt Romney, one of the two! You may have to vote for Huntsman or Trump on the Independent ticket and help put Obama back in! I’m predicting Newt will be the nominee although we have a long time to go, anything could happen! They might not be here or we might not be here to worry about an election, none of us are promised tomorrow!

      Report Post »  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 3:16am

      DRSAVAGE24
      But you want to hear how Paul is weak on or wrong on world affaires and lets not even bring up the UFOs. As for Bachmann who has already categorized as “crazy and a religious zealot” or the Husband factor.

      Everyone has flaws I just believe Newt has the skills to answer his positions and how he came to the right answer.

      Report Post » Miami  
  • garyM
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:31am

    It’s a lot easier to present your case and be smooth in doing it if you admit your mistakes, answer the questions in the clearest shortest possible answer, If canidate is spinning a lie, the people that spin lies forget which thing they spun last. You can always tell who is lying if you listen to them, they will eventually contradict themselves!
    The people that have no outstanding individual governmental accomplishments will constantly repeat themselves about their life, like I’m a former federal tax attorney, raised 5 kids and 23 foster kids. My husband adn I have a small business,,,,bla blab bla!!!!!! Don’t get me wrong I like her,I’m glad we got her as representative. I think she is a classy lady, presidential, NO!

    Report Post »  
    • DRSAVAGE24
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:42am

      She’s far less presidential than Newt Romney, right? Boy, it’s interesting to see the nitpicking of certain candidates, like with Bachmann her always repeating that she’s a tax attorney. You’re going to tell me that makes her less presidential than two guys who are in favor of the individual health insurance mandate, climate change legislation, and the wall street bailouts to name a few things? You’re smoking something. Who is your candidate? I’d like to know because surely they can be ripped to pieces as well, unless you’re supporting Ron Paul.

      Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:55am

      Garym, your brain has failed you again, Since when do you need “ outstanding government accomplishments” to be president? What we need to demand they need is honesty, integrity, standing with the constitution 100% of the time, faithfulness to their spouse, no flip flopping for votes, And they need to understand that they serve WE THE PEOPLE not we serve them or corporations.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • DRSAVAGE24
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:06am

      @Truth: Exactly. Bachmann’s rebuttal of Santorum was great. It wasn’t what she accomplished legislatively. It was that she had the courage to stick her neck out and fight. What she did may have been more important than any legislation. She rallied Americans to stand up for the constitution and fight Obamacare tooth and nail. She may have failed in that the legislation passed, but not without arm-twisting and bribery among Democrats that completely exposed what a corrupt and unjust law they were passing. Without her being front and center, maybe we would have never heard about the Cornhusker Kickback, the Louisiana Purchase, or Gator-Aid. Her putting this issue front and center may ultimately save this country because the chances now are much better that the law gets overturned because of how the left had to twist itself into a pretzel to pass it and now they’re tripping over themselves, contradicting themselves as they defend the law in federal court.

      Santorum may have been in the minority back in the 90′s, but the Democrats weren’t nearly as radical back then as they are now. Anyone with a brain knows that Bachmann was never going to get constitutional legislation passed with the communist Pelosi as speaker of the house.

      Report Post »  
  • lukerw
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:27am

    And, it’s PROGRESSIVE Nite… at the Roman Circus!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:24am

    A career politician would be a good thing if they voted for the Constitution 100% percent of the time like Dr Ron Paul does!

    Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • KangarooJack
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:43am

      Dang it! Don’t I know it! But I still stick to my vote. “anybody but Obama” and that is SAYING VOLUMES!!! It hurts. Just like I voted for Perot in the past…this time I have an agenda. “ABO”

      Report Post » KangarooJack  
    • Miami
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:53am

      KangarooJack

      I would vote for a wet dog before voting for Zero

      Report Post » Miami  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:37pm

      @Miami – Miami is just the biggest clown on this forum. Your by far the biggest waste of space. & I wouldn’t be surprised if you some socialist Obama supporter that wants Newt to win because he has no chance of beating Obama. Nice try, but I see people like you every where and I laugh right in your face and none of you do NOTHING.

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
  • SUMTHINSTINKS
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:23am

    ONCE AGAIN…Newt tells it like it is!

    http://www.NotMittRomney.com

    Report Post » SUMTHINSTINKS  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:48am

      Mitt Gingrich 2012! I kiiiiiiid, I joke!

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • I Love Freedom
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:57am

      Tells what like it is? His stand on health care? How he didn’t support auditing the Fed, but now he is for it?

      Report Post » I Love Freedom  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 9:58am

      I Love Freedom

      You didn’t listen to the debate did you…you did not hear that before the fire and after the flood that the conservatives at the time were thinking progressively and then they realized as did Newt that it was wrong…

      The grace of God should extend further than the one who receives it directly from God…

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:38pm

      @SUMTHINSTINKS – Sheep man

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
  • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:21am

    @ Chris Santerelli ( the moron who wrote this story)
    What planet are you living on? The planet of the apes? Dr Ron Paul is one of the two frontrunners yoy lying maggot, you and the rest of the lying media are trying to ressurect romneycon when he is clearly in 3rd place! Get a life and a real job you sleazebucket..

    Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • bullcrapbuster
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:32am

      I understand your frustration if the facts are being tampered with.

      Report Post » bullcrapbuster  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:02am

      yes, Team GB is raising up a ranch to herd the masses to who they think are the red heifer calf without blemish.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • TEXASGRANNY73
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:12pm

      @Chris Santarelli Your report was exactly the quote I heard. Brought out some sort of anger problem though.

      Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:59pm

      @grandma..
      You must have been listening to karl the potato head rove.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
  • Kiba
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:12am

    I gotta say Newt is right on it once again. If Romney hasnt been a career politician its not because he hasnt tried thats for sure! Sorry there Mitt but you gotta win first! lol!

    Report Post »  
    • bullcrapbuster
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:29am

      Yes but as Romney said…regardless of that,or anything else, he has spent his life in the private sector. Gingrich spent his life in government steeped in the problems that he helped to bring about. A career politician is something that has been said many times here, would mean another disasterous President. I am not for either of these rino’s, but Gingrich’s statement is meaningless and cheap.

      Report Post » bullcrapbuster  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 1:06am

      True bullcrap… doesnt matter that HE MIGHT HAVE been, the fact that he wasnt is what IS.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • football lady
      Posted on December 11, 2011 at 10:42am

      He was right on this, absolutely! Haven’ made up my mind who I will vote fore yet. I know who I will NOT vote for and that is Obama! I will support wholeheartedly whoever runs against him unless it would be Ron Paul, then i would have to hold my nose and vote. If he (Paul) wasn’t so scary on foreign policy, he’d have my vote. I am leaning toward Newt. I like Santorum a great deal though. Again, whoever gets the nomination will definitely have my vote. I pray whoever wins the primary will pick an VP candidate that knocks it out of the park.

      Report Post »  
  • KangarooJack
    Posted on December 11, 2011 at 12:10am

    Lou Abbot and Bud Costello .

    Report Post » KangarooJack  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love