Politics

Gingrich: Voting for Either Ron Paul or Obama ‘Would Be a Very Bad Choice for America’

Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:03pm by Tiffany Gabbay
Print »
Email »

Video follows below.

Speaking to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday, GOP presidential contender Newt Gingrich said he wouldn’t vote for Ron Paul if the libertarian-leaning candidate won the 2012 GOP nomination. The former House Speaker clarified, however, that he does not believe it likely that Paul would secure the nomination in the first place.

Gingrich‘s critiques of Paul included the Texas congressman’s stance on Israel, Iran, and the September 11 attacks.

“I think Ron Paul’s views are totally outside the mainstream of virtually every decent American,“ Gingrich said on ”The Situation Room.”

“He’s got to come up with some very straight answers to get somebody to take him seriously. Would I be willing to listen to him? Sure. I think the choice of Ron Paul or Barack Obama would be a very bad choice for America.”

When asked if he would be able to vote for Paul if the congressman secured the Republican nomination, Gingrich said unequivocally “No.”

“I think it’s very difficult to see how you would engage in dealing with Ron Paul as a nominee,” Gingrich said. “Given the newsletters, which he has not yet disowned. He would have to go a long way to explain himself and I think it would be very difficult to see today, Ron Paul as the Republican nominee.”

CNN adds:

Paul’s role in writing newsletters with racist remarks came under increased scrutiny last week as polls showed the Texas rising in popularity among Iowa voters. The most recent, from the American Research Group, shows Paul, Gingrich and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in a dead heat for first place. Paul has indicated he did not write all of the content in his newsletters and had not read some of it before publication.

In responding to negative ads Paul‘s campaign has released slamming Gingrich’s record as a conservative, the former House speaker said the spots were inaccurate.

“You look at Ron Paul’s record of systemic avoidance of reality, his ads are about as accurate as his newsletter,” Gingrich said. [...]

“He’s not going to get the nomination. It won’t happen,” Gingrich said. “The people in the United States are not going to accept somebody who thinks it’s irrelevant if Iran gets a nuclear weapon.”

Meanwhile, Paul‘s campaign called the GOP frontrunner’s comments “childish.”

Paul Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton stated:

“Frustration from his floundering campaign has Newt Gingrich showing who he really is: a divisive, big-government liberal. Newt has a long record of standing against conservatives dating back to his support for liberal Nelson Rockefeller over Barry Goldwater, so this sort of childish outburst is nothing new.”

Watch the provocative interview below:

Meanwhile, in a follow-up panel discussion, CNN’s Blitzer heaped praise on Gingrich, saying “it took guts” for the Contract with America author to criticize Paul as strongly as he did.

Mediaite adds:

There was a lot to unpack in Wolf Blitzer‘s interview with GOP presidential contender Newt Gingrich, but one thing that stood out was a panel discussion that Blitzer conducted following a clip of Gingrich’s attack on Rep. Ron Paul over his newsletters, among other things. The ostensibly objective Blitzer said he thought “it took guts” for Gingrich to come out against Paul so strongly, David Frum accused Paul of racism, and panelist Jonathan Prince said Paul was “racist by design.”

Watch Blitzer and the rest of the panel weigh in on Paul‘s history and Gingrich’s remarks below, courtesy of Mediaite:

This post has been updated.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (456)

patriot4ever
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:37pm
Gingrich is a Progressive and can’t be trusted
…
Paul needs to read the Koran and Hadith so he understands that the enemy will not stop trying to kill us if we take our toys and go home
…
The POTUS is a Communist and should be on trial for treason
…
Congressman Allen West would be my pick, but I’m kinda partial to staying alive long enough to travel to Israel…so I can pray in the most Holy places on the planet.
…
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:43pm
  I’m sure Newt would not vote for Ron Paul and would vote for Obama. Where are all the people crying that Newt won’t support the nominee? Ha! Of course a Progressive will not support a Constitutionalist.
  
  Newt is a progressive and this is why he hates Ron Paul. Progressives hate the Constitution and anyone standing for it. This is why Newt continues to try and label Ron a racist or anti-Israel which both are untrue.
  
  Newt similarities to Obama
  -global warming
  -mandated healthcare
  -globalism
  -intervention
  -spending
  -UN
  -Agenda 21
  -Transforming government
  -patriot act
  -holding citizens as terrorist
  
  No wonder Newt would not vote for Ron Paul. Newt likes Obama better because Obama and Newt have a lot in common. .
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:55pm
  @Patriot4ever
  
  Allen West sucks. He voted to raise the debt ceiling and for the detention of US citizens if deemed a terrorist by the president. West sucks.
  
  If you did read a Koran you would see what you said is completely wrong. Whether right or wrong, Jihad is only allowed against invaders on holy land per the Koran and thus the reason we are attacked there by jihadists. If you’d like the verses I can provide them. I am not Muslim but truth is truth. You and half America would wage war in the name of God if Saudi Arabia built a base in Texas to defend the US border with Mexico. You and half America would rise up to rid the USA of the Muslim invader. Same principle Muslims have in the middle east.
  
  Islam cannot survive under a Constitutional Republic.
  Islam will thrive under a progressive democratic US.
  
  Newt is more dangerous in regards to allowing Islam to thrive here because he is progressive.
  Report Post »
- patriot4ever
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:57pm
  I, Thomas Cook, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
  …
  I would think that the POTUS would have to be an Oathkeeper that takes threats seriously enough to defend our Constitution in the most literal sense of the word.
  …
  Could Ron Paul be the Commander in Chief and do what is required and not what he ‘thinks’ is required? I doubt it.
  Report Post »
- KeystoneState
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:57pm
  With a strong possibility of a republican house and senate, who would do more damage to the country, a 75% progressive republican Newt with strong support, or a 100% progressive democrat Obama with weak support? So much for the lesser of two evils argument! I’m voting for the Constitution following Ron Paul.
  Report Post »
- Gold Coin & Economic News
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:57pm
  Paul would let Iran get the bomb. Multiply Hitler by 10 and you have a nuclear Iran, and Ron Paul thinks if we just play nice, Ahmadinejad will shave his beard, take a bath and peace will come to the Middle East.
  
  That‘s why I can’t vote for Ron Paul. It doesn’t have anything to do with hating Ron Paul. It has everything to do with letting wackos go nuclear.
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:59pm
  Let me repeat yet again, Ron PORKY Paul has never accomplished anything SIGNIFICANT except for publishing a racist newsletter and taking all the pork he could get his hands on. He is therefore a liar about not knowing the content of HIS newsletter and a hypocrite for grabbing all the pork he could and then voting against the bill that contained his pork, knowing full well that the bill would pass and he would get his pork.I still challenge all you Paulbutz to come up with just ONE, only ONE SIGNIFICANT thing PORKY has ever accomplished besides all his complaining talk. Betcha can’t.
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:00pm
  GOLDCOIN IS A TROLL AND A FEARMONGER
  Look at his posts.
  Report Post »
- KTsayz
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:02pm
  Newt who?
  
  Ron Paul warns us of the dangers of the UN in this 1998 video
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X554O6TwiYM&feature=player_embedded
  
  Ron Paul for our Constitution, liberties and economic freedom 2012
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:04pm
  This plays right into Pauls hand again, Nobody is voting or listen to Newt, He cant draw a enough people for a Tango or even get on the ballot in the state he lives. Just grasping for straws here.. Bachmann, Perry, Cain, and Trump have all tried to attack the Dr. Look at them all now. We are going to take Iowa in a Landslide and they know it. It Revolution time.
  Report Post »
- The10thAmendment
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:06pm
  @ patriot4ever
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:57pm
  
  I, Thomas Cook, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
  …
  I would think that the POTUS would have to be an Oathkeeper that takes threats seriously enough to defend our Constitution in the most literal sense of the word.
  …
  Could Ron Paul be the Commander in Chief and do what is required and not what he ‘thinks’ is required? I doubt it.
  ——————————————————————————————————————————–
  The first order and only true allegiance is vested IN THE CONSTITUTION. ANYONE who would order them to act AGAINST the rights and liberty of the people is an enemy. That includes the president.
  
  The Patriot Act is criminal, period. Detaining American citizens because a tyrant deems them dangerous, is criminal, period.
  
  AS a citizen of the United States, and the Military’s real boss, I request the Military defend the Constitution and arrest the president to stand trial for treason against the Constitution he swore to support and defend.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:09pm
  @Gold Coin
  
  If Iran wanted a bomb they could have bought one from Russia who “hates” us too.
  
  UAE has nuclear technology which is Muslim and we just gave UAE bunker busting bombs too!
  Saudi Arabia just said they are building Nuclear reactors and wanting a bomb.
  Pakisan was funded by Saudi Arabia in when getting nuclear technology.
  
  Bush did nothing to stop Iran
  Obama has done nothing to stop Iran
  
  Arab armed by the USA will be the ones stopping Iran so as to not heighten or legitimize more jihad with foreign US troops being brought in.
  
  Are you saying we must go to war with Iran? If so clearly say that. Either you are for war to stop Iran or you are not.
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:10pm
  Patriot4ever, First you were for Cain, now you would be for West (but West isn’t even running) but you could not vote for Ron Paul? This is because you do not understand Paul and you have not researched him. Paul is the only candidate running that would adhere to the Constitution. The Constitution does not give the President the right to attack anyone without first getting a declaration of war from Congress. He can give an order to fight back immediately if our troops are being attacked before going to Congress, but going into another country because you suspect them? No. Paul would be strong on National defense if there was a clear and present danger. He would take all intelligence gathered to Congress, make his case for war, get approval and then go in with guns blazing. He would get the job done quickly, then get out and not do nation building afterwwards. No wonder the establishment does not want him, there is big taxpayer money for the croni’s to make after war that Paul would not allow. Is it that hard for all you progressive followers to understand? Paul 2012.
  Report Post »
- The10thAmendment
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:10pm
  A vote for Gingrich is a vote for a mixture of Stalin and Mao, with a little Pol Pot on the edges.
  Report Post »
- Drakkhanlord
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:15pm
  you better search again…Alan West voted FOR dam near everything obama pushed…
  
  how did he vote on the NDAA…? better ask him a few questions.
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:18pm
  Gold Coin, This is why we call you progressive thinkers names. You do not have a clue about history and the present situation. Hitler was the leader in Germany that had a huge army, air force and navy. They had the technology to threaten the world. Iran has NOTHING. They cannot even refine gasoline from all that oil they have. They have no army, air force or navy to speak of and all they do is threaten, threaten and threaten some more. Now if Isreal was like Iran in its ideology and was talking about leveling the U.S., we would have to take that seriously as they do have one of the strongest military forces in the world and sit on 3-400 nuclear weapons. Get real man. Do your own research and stop listening to the establishment that wants a OWO. Paul 2012.
  Report Post »
- KeystoneState
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:19pm
  Israel is more then capable of cleaning the floor with Iran and not even leaving a heavy waxy buildup, and the Russians, and Chinese billionaires like their stuff too much to stick their necks out and risk getting nuked themselves for piss-ant Iran, though that’s not to say they enjoy watching the west squirm! This BS about the Mideast blowing up if Paul is elected is just that, B.S!
  Report Post »
- bristoltrucker
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:30pm
  Anyone that says Muslims are only attacking us is because we have bases in the middle east are ignorant of the history of when Muslims began attacking Americans and our ships. It began almost immediately upon our country winning it’s freedom from the British. And we had absolutely no military bases anywhere on foreign soil. Where do you think that part of the Marine Corps anthem that mentions the “shores of Tripoli” came from? When we had to send our troups into the middle east to stop them from attacking our citizens and ships. That is why Ron Paul shows he is out of touch with reality when he claims that our having soldiers on their land is why they are attacking us. They are attacking us because we do not convert to Islam. You know Ron Paul supporters keep telling those who oppose him we need to read a book or look into history, but it is they who refuse to know the true history of Islam and their attacks on the U.S.
  Report Post »
- WireWizard
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:31pm
  I, John Holmes, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
  
  I’ll join you in that pledge. I did it in 1974 and it still applies today.
  
  As for Newt, he’s gonna have to give up the “smartest guy on the stage” creds. He just blew it.
  Report Post »
- patriot4ever
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:31pm
  @ West Coast Patriot – Yes, I have studied up on Ron Paul and have spent countless hours debating the bots that infiltrated the TEA Party group (That by the way was NOT started by Ron Paul) that I founded.
  …
  The conclusion I’ve come to after a few years of studying this phenomenon is that I could never vote for him. I don’t consider him a psychologically stable enough human being to be the President of the United States.
  …
  Decisions based in reality would have to made that affect the lives of every US Citizen and I wouldn’t trust him with that responsibility. In short, I think he’s too mentally unstable to fit the job description of POTUS.
  …
  We’re all entitled to our own opinion and I have derived mine through a few years of research and countless hours of political discourse with Ron Paul supporters, reading the Constitution and the Federalist Papers and yes, the Anti-Federalist Papers.
  Report Post »
- ZengaPA65
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:35pm
  I was wondering where the daily bash Ron Paul article was on the “no agenda” Blaze today. I saw the daily “no agenda” obsess over what Muslims are doing. No other conservative site online posts these stupid articles.
  Report Post »
- Cause4Liberty
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:43pm
  Here is one more example of Newt’s Hypocrisy:
  
  http://2012.republican-candidates.org/Gingrich/Marijuana.php
  
  From Advocate to mandatory death penalties. Tisk tisk, why the change of heart? Money perhaps? For all, ANTI-paulists, who say only “potheads” are Ron Paul supporters, how do you feel about supporting Newt the ‘pot head?’ LoL@ ________. I bet liked GwB, an ex-coke fiend. How about Bill clintons brother? Ya’ll keep voting for more corruption.
  
  Why has Afghan gone from 10% opium exports, to 90+% opium exports? Why are we protecting their poppy plants? Who is profiting from these actions?
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:50pm
  @BristolTrucker
  
  The Barbary Wars is what you speak of. What you do not list is why they attacked us: we were FOREIGN ships in their trading waters. The Moroccans viewed us as invaders and began attacking and kidnapping US ships until we either paid ransom to pass and stop attacks, which we did, or leave. The war was waged after becoming tired of paying ransom and soon after war we established a treaty in which attacks were stopped.
  
  You are using revised history and are not being fully honest.
  
  If you do not know who you are fighting and why, you will never ever win.
  
  Ron Paul is correct on why they attack us. Muslims themselves say the exact same thing. “We will attack you thru jihad until you leave the holy land.“ ”We will attack you here and abroad until you leave the Holy Land.” What part of that are you having a hard time understanding?
  
  Are you saying the enemy is wrong about why they attack us? WOW!
  
  http://www.nonintervention.com
  Report Post »
- techengineer11
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:56pm
  Patriot4ever: Dr. Manning made this video a few short weeks ago just for you. Enjoy and Learn. lol
  
  http://youtu.be/PNbElwyOToY
  
  This video is not as funny as many of Dr. Manning’s videos. It has a sort of serious nature to it but evenso it still will leave you laughing and for the most part it’s so true.. These supposed Tea Party patriots are running from one black man to another… lol
  Report Post »
- The-Real-Enrico
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:59pm
  This just shows us who and what Newt is. I don’t believe Paul is a racist. People just try to use that to shut Ron down. I think those letter were just a bad investment on Ron and is still paying for it.
  
  I do agree that his foreign policy is wack. But to vote Obama over Paul! That truely is crazy. I would vote Paul over RomNewtey anyday.
  
  Bachman/Santorum 2012!
  Report Post »
- Captain77
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:01pm
  Patriot4Ever, most veterans and active duty military, myself included, disagree with you. Ron Paul has more support from active duty military than any other republican presidential candidate combined. I also took that oath, and it is for that oaths sake that Ron Paul is so appealing to the military. HE ACTUALLY PROTECTS AND DEFENDS THE CONSTITUTION, from enemies foreign and domestic. All other candidates are on the record attacking it. And if you have taken that sacred oath, perhaps you should study more of the constitution, then perhaps you will see that you allegiance should lie with the true champion of the constitution.
  Report Post »
- techengineer11
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:04pm
  Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:43pm
  I’m sure Newt would not vote for Ron Paul and would vote for Obama. Where are all the people crying that Newt won’t support the nominee? Ha! Of course a Progressive will not support a Constitutionalist.
  
  Newt is a progressive and this is why he hates Ron Paul. Progressives hate the Constitution and anyone standing for it. This is why Newt continues to try and label Ron a racist or anti-Israel which both are untrue.
  
  Newt similarities to Obama
  
  Ole wise one. The world is in good hands as long as you are around. I simply don‘t understand why so many supposedly Conservatives can’t see these very obvious contradictions.. Anyway thought I’d copy and paste because it most definitely needs to be stated over and over again until some of the less mentally nimble may absorb it… lol
  Report Post »
- DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:11pm
  Allen West voted to extend the patriot act and voted for indefinite detention of American citizens. As a Jew I stand with Israel and therefore I support Ron Paul. As an American I support INDIVIDUAL liberty and therefore I stand with Ron Paul. West is a traitor to this country and you are certainly no patriot.
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:47pm
  More on Paul being a Racist. Another Aid comes forward. Not looking good.
  http://www.haaretz.com/news/u-s-elections-2012/u-s-presidential-hopeful-ron-paul-isn-t-anti-israel-former-aide-says-1.403946
  Report Post »
- techengineer11
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:48pm
  DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:11pm
  Allen West voted to extend the patriot act and voted for indefinite detention of American citizens. As a Jew I stand with Israel and therefore I support Ron Paul. As an American I support INDIVIDUAL liberty and therefore I stand with Ron Paul. West is a traitor to this country and you are certainly no patriot.
  
  Doesn’t get any more clearer than that folks. Please some of you Constitution loving Conservative Patriots please please tell me why you allow support and condone your elected officials to pass laws such as the Patriot act and the new DAA containing a provision which allows the US Military to lock up American citizens whom the “President” declares a terrorist? Please justify that Conservative Americans on Glenn Beck’s “The Blaze”. Do you have any answers? Why do you forfeit our Liberty and Freedom?
  Do you put that much confidence in your current and future Presidents? Do you think they will never abuse this language? Oh my god. Is there anyone on the Blaze who will defend these actions? I call you out if you are there.. All of you Newt fans Romney fans Santorum Bachmann? They all support it too. Please explain yourself.
  
  There’s no explanation and no justification. You have most certainly struck out against the spirit of the US Constitution! The Oath Keepers group is calling for a recall of the Senators and Congressman that supported the DAA recently and I agree with them wholehear
  Report Post »
- jzs
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:48pm
  If I were voting in a Republican primary, I’d vote for Paul for two reasons. One, because he is the only decent, honorable, principled politician in national politics. He has a moral, solid backbone as far as his political philosophy, whether you agree with it or not. The other candidates either have no real beliefs (hence, the flip flops) or are simply nuts (Bachmann? Seriously?). And two, because I’m a Democrat and Paul has no chance of winning a general election.
  Report Post »
- Julz
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:55pm
  Gives a golf clap!!!
  Report Post »
- SacredHonor1776
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:57pm
  Reading Jefferson‘s involvement with the Moslems in the Barbery Wars couldn’t hurt…
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:57pm
  @Tech
  
  When you line up Obama with Newt and Mitt it’s astonishing how much they have in common. They may disagree on say where/how much to spend or where/how to intervene with war but all are for more spending and more intervention.
  
  All 3 supported individual mandates.
  All 3 supported cap n trade
  All 3 support foreign aid (redistribution of wealth internationally)
  All 3 support the UN
  All 3 support socialistic domestic policies
  All 3 are elitists
  All 3 supported bailouts
  All 3 support defending Muslim tyrant Saudi Arabia
  All 3 support the patriot act and detention of US citizens
  All 3 are backed by wall street
  All 3 support bigger Government
  All want to tell Israel what to do
  All 3 are Progressive
  
  Ron Paul does not support any of those and that is the reason they hate Ron Paul. Ron Paul stands against everything the progressives want.
  
  Hope you are doing well man!
  Report Post »
- Babeuf
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:12pm
  Okie,
  
  Seems to me that Ron Paul has more in common with Hitler!
  
  http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/top-10-racist-ron-paul-friends-supporters/
  
  Glenn, you got some splainin to do!
  Report Post »
- booger71
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:15pm
  I will only vote for anyone NOT named Obama. If that happens to be Ron Paul, that is fine by me. A question to the “Paul Only” crowd. Will you say the same, what say you?
  Report Post »
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:17pm
  @CommonSense:
  
  Did you even READ the article you linked?
  
  Because I did.
  
  And you’re trying to characterize what this man said, ALL of which is favorable to Paul, as somehow detrimental, simply shows either a dementia so complete as to render you unable to breathe, or a sore lack of ability with regards to your reading comprehension, for which you should seek immediate and comprehensive remediation.
  Report Post »
- SacredHonor1776
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:21pm
  “we were FOREIGN ships in their trading waters. The Moroccans viewed us as invaders and began attacking and kidnapping US ships until we either paid ransom to pass and stop attacks, which we did, or leave. The war was waged after becoming tired of paying ransom and soon after war we established a treaty in which attacks were stopped.”
  
  You do realize, that the Mediterrian didn’t belong to “Morocco” right? That the ‘pirates’ were attacking any ship across the entire Mediterrian… Most seas do not belong to a single nation… Before the US became a nation, American ships were protected by the Navies of Britain and France. When it became sovereign it had to defend itself.
  
  Adams didn’t want to cause a international ruckus or get too involved, so he chose to pay the tributes…
  
  Jefferson and Adams came back to US after talking to the Tripoli ambassador;
  
  “It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.”
  
  Jefferson decided defend the US, he went
  Report Post »
- Crazy Times
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:24pm
  TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE IS A TROLL AND A FEARMONGER
  Look at his posts.
  Report Post »
- chicago76
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:25pm
  Too bad Gingrich is not a decent American and would not know what a decent American is. He is just another I will rip off as much as I can get from America before it goes down type. They are all over the place getting money from Fannie etc. Believe me they like the system as it is. Political types are making money hand over heals helping to destroy our country.
  Report Post »
- SacredHonor1776
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:26pm
  Thomas Jefferson may have favored “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.”
  
  In which he meant free enterprise and trade with all nations… But when it came down to another nation attacking American citizens and British allies, he intervened…
  
  I suppose some might see that as hypocricy on his part, or accuse him of being a ‘neocon’ or ‘progessive’?
  
  As I understand it, after Barbary Wars, the United States even published a version of the Quran, in which had a warning on the front cover as well. Warning of dangerous beliefs in the Koran… I guess the publishers were “Neocons” as well (even if Neocons didn’t actually exist back then).
  Report Post »
- chicago76
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:28pm
  Patriot4ever is deluded or intoxicated. Can’t tell what the heck he is talking about.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:28pm
  @BabeUF
  
  Really? How long did you think to come up with that slander?
  
  Good try but failure!
  
  To be truthful, the ones most like Hitler are Progressives. Remember, Hitler studied and learned a lot from Progressives including Propaganda (which you just shared) as well as Eugenics. The ones wanting to tell Israel what to do are the most like Hitler because they do not respect Israel and her desire to live Self reliant and Independent.
  
  Ron Paul is for Israel determining her own fate and being her best friend by respecting that.
  
  I bet you think Glenn is a racist anti-Semite like every body was saying too…….
  
  Get your facts straight and stop repeating Progressive propaganda otherwise you are only being a useful idiot as they would call you.
  Report Post »
- Babeuf
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:50pm
  Okie,
  
  Idiot? Maybe. Useful… I HOPE so!
  
  White Supremacists Rally Around Ron Paul’s Newsletter Scandal
  
  http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/white-supremacists-rally-around-ron-pauls-newsletter-scandal/46579/
  
  Muchos Gracchus where it itches
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:51pm
  @Sacred Honor
  
  First, I hope you are doing well.
  
  Before I add some info you left out, I will simply ask a few questions:
  
  do you believe Muslims want to kill anyone who isn’t of Islam?
  
  Would you send your military to defend a Muslim Nation?
  
  Would you send American tax dollars to a Muslim Nation?
  
  If Muslims hate us and want to kill all infidels why do Bachmann, Santorum, Newt, and Romney want to continue sending American tax dollars to Muslim Nations? Doesn’t logic say they are enabling and protecting the enemy you say wants to kill us no matter what?
  
  No Moraccans do not own the whole M Sea. If they simply attacked us for not being Muslim why did they stop? If they are commanded to kill all infidels no matter what, how did they make a treaty to stop the attacks?
  Report Post »
- AhLeahIris
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:58pm
  Well, I‘m not sure what to think about Ron Paul and Newt’s comments, but I think I finally understand Ron Paul on the question of WWII: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1O4
  Report Post »
- KICKILLEGALSOUT
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:58pm
  So now the Blaze is becoming a mouthpiece for Gettinrich? Ever since Dr. Paul has gained traction and is clearly the only real contender against Obama there has been non-stop hit pieces that are all Anti Ron Paul and Pro establishment, New World Order candidates. You got them on the run Dr. Paul, the corrupt media saw they couldn’t ignore you so now they have no choice but to run non stop smear campaigns. It‘s just too bad they don’t have nothing more than hearsay to try to damage your good name. The primaries are coming soon, get ready to show the world that you refuse to compromise your vote by choosing their pre chosen candidate for you and instead choose Dr. Paul.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:00am
  @BabeUF
  
  As long as you know what you are, progressive useful idiot, I’m happy.
  
  You can post all the propaganda you wish. It shows how similar to Hitler you are.
  
  Here is another great racist clip of Ron Paul:
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY&feature=related
  Report Post »
- TheBMT
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:08am
  Where is going to be the uproar from Fox and such from the right with Gingrich comments about not voting for Paul? Paul says he wouldn’t vote for certain people and Fox goes nuts. Will they do the same for Gingrich?
  Report Post »
- JohnnyinthePedros
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:08am
  Of course Newt would never vote for Paul. Ron Paul actually believes that the Constitution and Bill of Rights still mean something.
  Report Post »
- Babeuf
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:15am
  Okie,
  
  The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable.
  What did Glenn say? Show me your friends and I will show you your future.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:16am
  @Sacred honor
  
  Yes, Jefferson wanted to know what was in the Koran to make Muslims fight they way they did. Adams was a sissy and paid ransom and Jefferson manned up and said no we will fight until we get a truce and he did.
  
  What is left out was there was conflicts between Catholics (Christians) and Muslims in the M Sea and this helped lead to our vessels being attacked as well. This is why in the treaty of Tripoli it says we are not a “Christian” Nation, meaning not a Nation of Rome and Christian meaning Catholic as they call themselves. It was to distinguish the US from Europe.
  
  Our foreign vessels were first seen as European vessels, invaders and trespassers in the eyes of those on the Barbary coast.
  
  Christians believe if you do not recognize Jesus you are a sinner.
  Catholics encouraged “Christians” to wage crusades for Holy Land.
  Catholics said if you die fighting for God you go to Heaven.
  Catholics tortured and enslaved all those they captured.
  
  What is the difference? Nothing.
  
  Ron Paul is much like Jefferson. Don’t go meddling in other Nations but if attacked bring the full scope of the military and make your opponent submit. Jefferson didn’t rebuild tripoli nor did he prop up a dictator. He DEFENDED Americans until a treaty was setup.
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:25am
  The Blaze silenced me again. Tried to put Patriot4ever in his place by pointing out the obvious twice with the same message, but post is not on here. I am guessing that Patriot4ever is a Blaze moderator. Shame on you Blaze. I have the post saved in a doc. so I will continue to try to post even if I have to post on another story.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:34am
  @BabeUF
  
  Yes truth is powerful and this racial clip of Ron Paul keeps the record straight.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY&feature=related
  
  You cannot defeat Ron Paul’s Constitutional stance so you try to discredit him as a “racist”.
  
  For all I know you could have made that racist site. You could make a racist site tomorrow and donate $500 dollars to Romney and would that make Romney a racist? NO
  
  You don’t see Ron Paul at racist events. You see Ron Paul fighting for minorities.
  
  So does that mean the USA is Muslim since we are friends with Muslim Nations?
  
  Is Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum Muslims since they want to send money and be “friends” with Muslim Pakistan?
  
  Are all the candidates who want to send Muslim nations tax dollars anti-Semitic because they are friending Muslims who hate Israel?
  
  Sounds like you got some explaining to do….
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:44am
  Patriot4ever, So, you think that you started the Tea Party? The Tea Party is much bigger than one group. With this said, I would say that you are too mentaly unstable to run a Tea group and a Tea group is not every U.S. patriot. I am a U.S. Navy Vet and I too read the Constitution, Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers and I believe in the words and arguments in those papers and I have made my decision based on those principles set down by our Founding Fathers, do you? You didn’t say in your last post. I do not expect you to change your opinions as you cannot change mine, but I hope that you wake up to what has been happening for decades and come to my side. That is what debate is all about. I take the office of the President seriously, therefore, I will not make a decision on who I vote for based on political discourse from a candidates supporters. I will vote on Pauls record. Anyone that has to move to the center, left or right are lying to you. Paul stays on course and always has. Ron Paul 2012.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:47am
  @Bristol Trucker
  
  Here is the correct link: http://non-intervention.com/
  
  Everyone should check that site out if you want to understand our military engagements and what we are fighting as well as why.
  
  Mike is a great man. Trust him with my life! All or nothing—-
  Report Post »
- GUNNSUP
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 1:37am
  Gold Coin, gear up and head over to Iran and kick some ass for us. Let us know if you locate that nuke lab. When you do, blow it to smithereens for us eh?
  Report Post »
- ConstLaw
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 1:45am
  “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results” (Albert Einstein). Obama, Romney and Gingrich are the “same thing” (progressives) we have had for a long time, but Ron Paul is “something different.” if you want the course of our country to change, then choosing anyone other than Ron Paul is insanity.
  Report Post »
- Dcjones
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 7:56am
  I used to not like Ron Paul’s vision on Foreign Policy. But the more I read about it, the more I agree. I think that these other countries need to defend themselves for a change. Why are we spending trillions to defend Europe, Asia, and the Middle East? Don’t they have their own money? The only reason they don’t build their own defense is because they know that we will do it for them using our hard earned capital and blood. And what do we get?? Nothing but pissed off people because we are the world “police”. And yes there are a lot of pissed off people around the world at us justified or not, it’s the truth.
  Well guess what….. We are BROKE! BROKE! BROKE! And the fact is that even if we wanted to continue the policy, we can’t because we are BROKE! BROKE! BROKE!
  
  It is like we are issuing out military welfare. If we defend other countries because they need us, we should at least get paid for it. I propose they pay say $200,000 per infantry a year + expenses + equipment and transportation costs. Let us see how quick they want us to defend them then?
  
  How safe will the world be if we need to precipitously leave the military posts because we are BROKE! It would be a disaster. Its better to wind down slowly, this is Ron Paul’s policy. Understand it!
  Report Post »
- V-MAN MACE
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 11:21am
  Newt Gin-grinch is crashing and burning in Iowa, Romney is going to crash with him, and Ron Paul is going to take this election.
  
  Make Neocons and Liberals foam at the mouth when you vote for Ron Paul 2012!
  
  There’s nothing they can say or do at this point! Just LAUGH AT THEM as you check Ron Paul or write his name in!
  
  RON PAUL 2012
  
  PRESIDENT PAUL!
  
  NO MORE NEOCONS!
  
  NO MORE LIBERALS!
  Report Post »
- DrFrost
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 11:38am
  Newt should not have included “decent” in his statement. Then the statement would simply been a statement of fact and not a moral judgement. Regarding those topics: Iran, Israel and 9/11, Ron Paul’s views are definitely not mainstream.
  
  If Dr. Paul doesn’t get the republican nomination, I wonder how many of his base will vote for Gary Johnson. Gary has always been my personal favorite but I fear that running as a third party candidate he’s only going to be helping Obama get reelected.
  Report Post »
- Roaran
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:35pm
  Here’s the problem with RINO foreign policy. First, let’s assume we can round up EVERY SINGLE terrorist/jihadist/muslim in the world. Now that we have them all in one place, let’s again assume we can dispose of them, either banishment or execution. The objective of RINO foreign policy is to eliminate all such threats either imprisonment or execution. The problem is…. you will not stop more people from becoming terrorists, jihadists, and/or muslims. YOU’RE FIGHTING A TACTIC THAT USES ADHERES TO AN IDEOLOGY.
  
  If you kill all the communists on the planet, you will not eradicate communism. If you kill all the terrorists, you will not eradicate terrorism. It’s a continual campaign that drains freedom and prosperity from the innocent.
  
  THE ONLY WAY to defeat an ideology is to make it SO OBVIOUS that our beliefs are superior, that it becomes effortless to join us. AND I’M AFRAID BOMBING OTHER COUNTRIES, KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE, AND IMPOSING OUR WILL ON THEM, IS NOT GOING TO ACCOMPLISH THAT!
  
  Ron Paul has the answer, bring home our troops, MAKE US SAFE, and stop giving two $%@#s about people killing other people in other countries.
  
  Again, whether you like it or not.. Ron Paul speaks the truth and he has the answers… America will only fail when its people have given up or forgotten freedom.
  Report Post »
- Amarath01
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:38pm
  @bristoltrucker
  “Muslims began attacking Americans and our ships. It began almost immediately upon our country winning it’s freedom from the British. And we had absolutely no military bases anywhere on foreign soil”.
  
  You mean piracy ? You know this occurred in most areas, where is the argument about Buddhist war against the US i mean Buddhist people attack our very few ships in Pacific at this time also.
  
  Wait let me guess then next thing you’ll tell em is that they were state sanctioned (or let to be by the gov of that area). Sure they were, just like most pirates were 100 years before that (sorry if they failed to socially progress, ie they were just doing what they had learned from Europe yet lack the social and technological advancements to change they systems of governance such as the “west” had).
  See history is one of those things if you pull a fact out from it it may seem to suggest something , but taken in context you learn that most often it supports the opposite proposition.
  Report Post »
- Kara_ite
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 1:15pm
  Please watch the video
  http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/101565.html
  Report Post »
- Knight Templar
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 3:57pm
  Okie from Muskogee—–I have read enough of the quran to know patriot4ever is not wrong. The muslims have said the only want us to leave the middle east. They have said they want to change the world to islam. I think I’ll believe their history(ancient and recent) of treacherous, murdering barbarians.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 4:19pm
  @Knight Templar
  
  You can believe a tree is a dog but it doesn’t make it true.
  
  As long as you support a candidate that sends tax dollars to Muslim Nations, sells arms to Muslim Nations, and defends Muslim Nations you are doing nothing but supporting Islam.
  
  Jihad is used only to fight invaders in Muslim land. That’s straight from the Koran and is legitimized every time a foreign Nation tries to intervene in Muslim land as seen against Russia in Afghanistan and against USA in Iraq.
  
  Sure, Islam wants to spread their religion all over the world just as Christianity wants to spread it’s religion all over the world. That doesn’t mean Islam wages Jihad to spread Islam because they do not. You are mixing the two.
  
  Islam will never survive under a Constitutional Republic.
  Islam will thrive in the US under a Progressive “democracy”.
  
  Believe as you wish but it doesn’t make it true.
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 5:00pm
  Gingrich is such a liar. Here is a small one:
  “I took that vacation to Greece because I needed to see the fiscal crisis up close”
  
  Gingrich: I took that vacation to Greece because I needed to see the fiscal crisis up close
  
  http://politicalwire.com/archives/20…to_greece.html
  
  (He went on a cruise to the Greek Islands not the mainland)
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 5:55pm
  Want someone to beat Obama?
  
  PPP: w/ 24% of electorate that’s non-GOP: Paul leads Mitt 39-12!
  
  https://twitter.com/#!/AbolishTheFed…43982502219776
  Report Post »
- SaraD
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:08am
  Newt just signed his third fidelity pledge, that beside the one most of us took when we said “To forsake all others in our wedding vows”. After presenting his wife with divorce papers in the hospital Newt didn’t pay his child support and ran her finacially into the ground as he bought gifts for his mistress turned wife at the time. She had to borrow money to pay her light bill.
  This man should hold no office in the US. If he can’t make moral decisions in his life how would he make them for us?
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:32am
  Here‘s a black man talking about Ron Paul in the early ’70 (regarding racist):
  
  http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/checkmate-video
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 10:42am
  Racism is collectivism — Dr. Paul surely isn’t THAT!
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmGcoUbi6Ec
  Report Post »
- Trading_barracuda
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 4:12pm
  2012 Is About Abolishing Slavery In America
  
  We’re on the verge of abolishing slavery in America.
  
  Ron Paul’s aim is to abolish the debt slavery & tax bondage of the FED/IRS Complex.
  
  Over the last 100 years of slavery we have gradually lost most of what America set out to be, do and have.
  
  We are not free. We are slaves.
  
  Put aside all of the non-essential issues and focus on abolishing slavery.
  
  Let’s start there.
  
  Our first priority is to regain our liberty, peace and prosperity.
  
  This is the narrative, the context for all of my campaign communications with others. It shuts down all of the nattering and competitiveness over the flavor-of-the-month candidates.
  
  No other candidate is cognizant of, or focused on abolishing the crushing debt slavery and tax bondage as a social issue.
  
  Without our liberty, nothing else matters.
  
  None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
  - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  Report Post »
MCDAVE
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:35pm
If RON PAUL is elected Washington is going to have to answer to WE THE PEOPLE..that really scares them in Washington…Please go to his website and read…
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- qpwillie
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:45pm
  @MCDAVE
  We‘ve all went to Ron Paul’s site and read. Where we differ from you is that we read other materials also.
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:51pm
  @tp
  the “other” materials being psy ops manuals ha spooky.
  Report Post »
- Detroit paperboy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:52pm
  Ron Paul is completly NUTS, and thats why i like him, why didnt Bush – Cheney stop Iran from getting a bomb? Seems it woulda been easier than now ! And about his foriegn policy , i will tell you this… BANKRUPT NATIONS IN COMPLETE COLLAPSE DONT HAVE A FOREIGN POLICY, so if we dont fix our DOMESTIC CRISIS, we aint even gonna have a damn foreiv policy to worry about, all together now , lets chant … We r broke we r broke we r broke, !!!!! Ron paul will cut one trillion the fist year from our CRIMINAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, and thats a good start, and Newt, news flash you fat Nancy Pelosi lovin walrus… Ron Paul wont vote for u either !!!
  Report Post »
- SFYMP
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:57pm
  Unfortunately quarter pound willy you flunked comprehension. Please tell us why you think your so smart in the ways of the world.who is your constitution loving best candidate please, Oh there are none. My bad as every other candidate is a joke. America First. It is time for a third party. I don’t trust either D or R…
  Report Post »
- bristoltrucker
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:34pm
  I am more concerned about what Ron Paul says when he is on conspiracy radio central, AKA the Alex Jones show. When Ron Paul openly endorses whacked out conspiracies and talks about how the Jews control all of the big banks and that they are intentionally destroying our economy. Listening to him there is where I found out that he is both psychotic and an anti-semite.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:05pm
  @BristolTrucker
  
  You sound like Cass Sunstien, label every one who disagrees with a conspiracy theorist…..
  
  Glenn Beck is all about conspiracy theories yet you come post at the Blaze…..Weird….Maybe it’s a conspiracy…..
  
  You stand for nothing and only preach Obama doctrine….Buzz off…
  Report Post »
- MCDAVE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:59pm
  I have been to all the websites as well…Spent the last three years organizing groups of people to call there congress men on voting issues..working with the Tea party..Ron Paul looks the best to me…But i will vote republican no matter who is nominated
  Report Post »
- MCDAVE
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:02am
  QPWILLIE Maybe I read more than you and understand issues you don’t…The world is chasing a 700 trillion dollar deficit down the drain..They just keep printing more robbing us out of our equity..We fight wars over no noble causes;just oil …We live under the stranglehold of government interference in our lives and our businesses…. all this is going to bankrupt us…I think its already too late to stop the bankruptcy of half the world ..its happening now…But maybe if we can save our constitution and solve the problems as free people we will be better off than other countries..Ron Paul is not crazy..he understands this..its time for the people of the world to stop killing each other…How much war can there be if no banks would finance it..The USA has vast energy reserves right here on our soil lets get to work on solving our problems and we will prosper again…Energy is going to continue to get more expensive;;it will force our economies to become more local.. the jobs will come home because it will to expensive to transport goods worldwide..so much opportunity in the future ,,,All we need to do is turn this county in the right direction…A big socialist government is not going to solve any of these problems; a free people working together will..
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 9:59am
  QPWILLIE and others have compared Dr. Paul to Obama — even called Dr. Paul “liberal’
  It’s a lie.
  
  Want to see a chart, listing Congress by their ranking as conservative or liberal? It has everyone since 1937. Scroll to the very bottom (representing the most-conservative representative since 1937 and you’ll find Ron Paul).
  
  Ron Paul, the most conservative since 1937! http://www.voteview.com/is_john_kerry_a_liberal.htm
  Report Post »
- SaraD
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:15am
  Ron Paul is an unelectable racist. When asked about these publications he plays the “I am old and confused” bit. BS! He takes full credit for them, in a film that is circulating everywhere. If he can’t run a publication with his name on it, how could he run a country?
  I like the benifits of civil rights. I really enjoy eating where I like for lunch and being able to take out a loan on my own merit for schooling or a home. I would hate to think if RP had his way, I couldn’t do these things because I am a female. I also like that other races have rights as well, thank goodness. He may have a finacial plan that is pure magic, but he will never get my vote for where he stands morally, and ethically.
  Report Post »
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:33pm
Wow, the progressive warthog hates our Constitution so much he wouldn’t even vote for Ron Paul if he wins as a republican??? Talk about us really seeing the true character of these NWO shills, he does serv a purpose for them still, they will keep him alive politically until the last minute when they can corral his herd of sheeple over into romneyconSS pastures for the sake of “the party”.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- SFYMP
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:46pm
  That’s when the third party will take off, and it is beyond time folks. I will not vote republican to toe a line. Dr. Paul for President! Fight for Independence once again patriots.
  Report Post »
- chewfatlip
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:49pm
  If Paul gets the nomination, I will not vote for him. If barry wins, so be it.
  Report Post »
- SFYMP
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:02pm
  Thanks phatlip for proving you are as intelligent as newt. All you anti-paul bots show your subpar IQ with your pewling and whining. Would you like some cheese with that Ma’am. America First.
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:06pm
  Hey TRUTH I’m still waiting for just ONE, only ONE, just a little ONE significant ACCOMPLISHMENT that can be credited to Ron PORKY Paul. Not being able to name just ONE relegates your posts and opinion to useless.
  Report Post »
- Detroit paperboy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:12pm
  So let get this straight, we are borrowing 4 billion dollars a day , to keep trrops in 138 countries….. And thats a good foreign policy ??? Gimme a break, bankrupt nations dont have foreign policies. Period. And let israel , protect israel, and for that matter , South Korea, Japan, Germany, afghanistan etc. Etc….WE Are Broke… Period !!!!
  Report Post »
- BetterDays
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:27pm
  @monkeyspanker ( is that what you call that lil oldthang?)
  How about supporting an honorable man, one who diligently supports the constitution, whom gets “pork” for his constituency because the Hovernment robs them blind, he just gets as much of THEIR money back as he can. I WISH my congressmen had 1/10 the honor and integrity of Ron Paul and 1/10 the ability to get my tax money back in my district!
  But go ahead and vote for Obama or Obama lite and THINK your doing a good thing, you self engrandizing, sanctimonious, pernicious, insipid twit of uninspired electoral malfeasance to the detriment of the olfactory upon you own facade as well as that upon the facade of others.
  Just goes to satisfy my inquirery, America is too long in the pop up bread browning device and has long since past the point of being a palatable republic, and has slipped into being only fit for the carrion birds.
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:37pm
  @spanky
  Ron Paul has many accomplishments…One of his biggest is educating us on the evil of the federal reserve, another BIG accomplishment is UNITING millions of people to get back to the principals that have made this country great…Do you have any followers? What have you done besides eat bananas?
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:21pm
  BITTERDAYS – What a moron, major moron. Can’t even get the name right. Typical Paulbutz child trying to defend Ron PORKY Paul’s hypocrisy. You missed the part about voting against a pork laden (his pork) bill knowing full well that the bill would pass and he would get his pork. And, of course, your defense is he wanted to get the money for his district. Nice try. He wanted the money to buy his re-elections.
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:26pm
  TRUTH, again, all talk from PORKY. Can’t you get that? I was well aware of the FED situation and didn’t need Paul to tell me. Try again for a SIGNIFICANT accomplishment that is other than talk. Maybe you should pull the banana out of your A$$.
  Report Post »
- Stopit
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:45pm
  Hey Spanky, why in the world did Rick Perry say that he attributed Ron Paul to opening up his eyes to the federal reserve? And why is it that for the first time, some of the other candidates have finally said something in support of opposition to it. Even Michelle Bachmann finally joined in on the chorus duing a Beck interview. And it was partially audited already recently, with quite telling revelations.
  
  That, my friend, is a significant accomplishment of national consequence.
  Report Post »
- Crazy Times
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:36pm
  truthie, is that you? with your new pic? oh gee how nice breaking your chains from S&M? And I thought I flushed you away…
  
  TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE – “IS A TROLL AND A FEARMONGER
  Look at his posts.
  
  It must suck to be a scavanger bird looking for anyone to feed off of, dirty, unkempt birds you are, destined for a life of roadkill, supporting progressive clowns with your crioked beaks.
  
  nice try but no cigar, Your a fake and we know it, You got caught off gaurd and are crawfishing as usual, buying surplus uniforms doesn’t make you ex military.
  
  my definition of a spook troll is exactly what you are”
  
  your attacks show the “REAL TRUTH” about you truthie.
  Report Post »
- WD0331
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:54pm
  @ spankyourmonkey:
  I got one for ya. Ron Paul single handedly force the partial audit of the fed for the FIRST time ever. They even uncovered a TON of fraud and waste before they re-closed the books out of fear. That’s a pretty big accomplishment man!
  Report Post »
- BetterDays
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:00am
  Monkey shines
  Here, I will dumb down my speach so you can GET IT, okay?
  If you vote for anyone but Paul, you are supporting the systematic destruction of the Republic.
  In legal terms, that makes you an accessory after the fact. But don’t worry, I’m sure the new world order will eradicate you as well as your entire nation despite your piddling, UNeducated support of their agendas, thanks…..for absolutely nothing. Now, I realize there arena garuntee’s in life, save death, but must you continue to vote us into oblivion with you?
  Report Post »
- KICKILLEGALSOUT
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:05am
  Remember how many were writhing in agony over the fact a few months ago that Ron Paul said that if he did not win the Republican nomination he would not support the one who won it. Now that Dr. Paul is the front runner and is looking to win, why aren’t they asking Gettinrich and Romney the RINO if they will support Dr. Paul if he wins the nomination?
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:28am
  @crazy
  you must really like my quotes to copy them and repost them…that’s good to know, aI’ll keep them coming for you crooked beak buzzards.
  Report Post »
- SamIamTwo
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 7:03am
  chewfatlip
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:49pm
  
  If Paul gets the nomination, I will not vote for him. If barry wins, so be it.
  
  __________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Now that’s a great ideal, eh? If it were my dog, my dog would get the bloody vote!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 9:48am
  I wish all you moron Paulbutz could get my moniker right. There is nothing about “monkey” in it. Spankamonkey is someone else who occasionally posts here. As for PORKY’s big accomplishment of exposing the FED, nice but very weak. The FED is still around. Had PORKY really gotten rid of the FED, I would gladly credit PORKY with that SIGNIFICANT accomplishment. But, alas, again it’s another case of ALL TALK no walk for your boy PORKY.
  Report Post »
stewie12
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:33pm
Newt is an Idoit I will vote for Ron Paul or a third party and that is it. NO Newt, No Romney, No Bachman, And no other so called mainstream Republican and not Obama. I hope if he dose not get the nomanation he files to be a write in in my state or runs as an independent. Ron Paul 2012
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Baddoggy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:43pm
  Agreed. I would rather slit my wrists than vote for Gingrich. He is no different than Obama, just a progressive fool that does not understand the Constitution, but likes to use it’s words to be popular. Thomas Jefferson would @itch slap Newt.
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:09pm
  Typical cultist Pulbutz living in mommies basement and smoking dope or worse.
  Report Post »
- circleDwagons
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:13pm
  Agreed, voting for evil is evil. Ron Paul or true Libertarian. hopefully the Libertarian, Constitiution and Republican parties can agree on the same candidate.
  Report Post »
- The-Real-Enrico
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:58pm
  Whats the beef with Bachman? She wants to end the FED the department of education and etc.
  
  Other than I would Assam some of her foreign stances?
  
  Wouldn’t she be some of the closest things to most of Rons views?
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:17pm
  @The Real Enrico
  
  Bachmann, as well as Santorum, want to send your tax dollars to Pakistan, a Muslim Nation who doesn’t like Israel and did not tell us bin Laden was in their country.
  
  How is Bachmann or Santorum Pro-Israel if they are for sending OUR tax dollars to Muslim Nations?
  
  How is Bachmann or Santorum against redistribution of wealth if they advocate sending OUR tax dollars over seas?
  
  How is Bachmann and Santorum going to control our debt if they send our money overseas to Nations who really don’t like us?
  
  Why would either want to send OUR tax dollars to Muslim Nations but not want to spend it here at home? That’s a complete contradiction.
  
  I like both on their stances of Abortion but they contradict their platform in the instances above so I cannot support either.
  
  I could list more but that’s enough for me to say no way to both.
  Report Post »
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:37pm
  USA PATRIOT Act. NDAA ‘12. Need I say more?
  Report Post »
- SamIamTwo
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 7:06am
  stewie12
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:33pm
  
  Newt is an Idoit I will vote for Ron Paul or a third party and that is it.
  ________________________________________________________________________________
  
  THIRD PARTY, is another great ideal that will put Obama in office for a total of EIGHT years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  
  Wait till the 1st of Jan 2012 to see what ObamaCare takes away from you and recant your foolishness.
  Report Post »
- guido.cavalcanti
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:02pm
  She has some of the same views as Ron Paul as Ron Paul but isn’t too big on the 4th ammendment. She voted to extend key provision of the Patriot Act. Anyone who is a true defender of liberty wouldn’t have done that. Her foreign Policy is very in line with that of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Have a dozen simultaneous wars going on in the Middle East, continuing Predator Drone attacks in countries we haven’t declared war with, maintaining all of our foreign military bases, etc., etc. So in a way she has gotten on board with some of Ron Paul’s positions, way after the fact all be it, which, she does deserve some credit for but her foreign policy is very much the status quo, John McCain style, “lets go get em” that both the right and left endorse.
  Report Post »
pwatkins
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:33pm
Ron Paul is a nut…Newt Gingrich is a mutt…and Barrack Obama…Well..I we will take anybody but….. enough said.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:34pm
  Hello NSA troll
  Report Post »
- qpwillie
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:41pm
  @THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  
  So the definition of an internet troll is someone who has an opinion that differs with yours? Hmmm, I’ve always heard it means something else.
  Report Post »
- YepImaConservative
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:47pm
  Watch it QP… TRUTHER might call you a SPOOK besides a troll too, lol.
  
  Wanna‘ bet he see’s black helicopters circling above his room at night, spooks peering out with night vision apparatus?? Lol.
  Report Post »
- qpwillie
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:51pm
  @YepImaConservative
  
  Yeah, and cry all night when some goofy little Paulie calls me names. LOL
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:58pm
  @tp
  my definition of a spook troll is exactly what you are, I have no problem with people not agreeing with me, I have a problem with you clowns posing as WE THE PEOPLE when your not. You ignore the facts, twist the truth, mock those that have facts, avoid answering questions that prove your wrong, let’s be real, some of you are here to do exactly that? It’s really easy to spot you NSA trolls becuse YOU claim to suport OTHER canidates BIT YOU NEVER support their posotions, all you do is attack THE ONLY CONSTITUTIONALIST among them and cry foul when your called on it.
  Report Post »
- SFYMP
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:10pm
  Nice job Truth, Any one that only has one agenda with their derogatory/inflamatory comments is a NWO loving Troll. AKA sorosbutts
  Report Post »
- Go-rin-no-sho
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:26pm
  @PWATKINS’s
  “Ron Paul is a nut…Newt Gingrich is a mutt…and Barrack Obama…”
  is a SLUT!
  Report Post »
- Detroit paperboy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:40pm
  @pwatkins
  Hey, it rhymes ; ))
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:12pm
  Truth
  Try to play nice with the Trolls. They are entertaining to have around. The old man used to tell me ” When an fool is speaking , always have manners, never be rude and interrupt”
  Report Post »
BlazingChance
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:31pm
This coming from a guy that thought RomneyCare was a great idea. Newt Gingrich is morally bankrupt in just about every way possible. His record and his personal life speaks for itself.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- The-Real-Enrico
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:10pm
  Hmmm. I thought he he was only going to be positive and not attack other candidates. Serial hypocrisy anybody?
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 8:12am
  Newt has no supporters willing to give him time to get him on the Ballot in his home state of VA, let alone any money, He cant run adds + or – . Newt is just running from the mouth.
  Report Post »
SFYMP
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:31pm
We can’t ***** foot around and head down the NWO path people. The only candidate for me, is Dr. Paul. I want us to be self sufficient as a nation. I want our borders closed. Iran’s going to get nuclear no matter what we say or do. I agree on not meddling in anybodies business. Y‘all better pay attention and get rid of All politicians who ain’t rockin the boat. Dr. Paul has common sense that most college educated folks under 60 do not possess. Hence my entire family of 5 will vote for a constitutionalist. FTW, America first!
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:37pm
  YOU are what the establishment fears…someone that is and can think like an individual, impoosible to herd or control….
  Report Post »
- Baddoggy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:53pm
  Count me in too. The Constitution or nothing for me.
  Ron paul 2012
  
  I thought Ron Paul was a nutjob 4 years ago. then i listened to him. he does the WORST job of explaining positions because he is TRUTHFUL and non deceptive. Once you listen and realize what he is sayiing it makes sense. But you have to LISTEN…not a thing most people are willing to even try.
  Report Post »
- Love_John_Galt
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:04pm
  Ditto… Go Constitutional or go bust! DC is scared to death of the Constitution.
  
  Ron Paul 2012
  Report Post »
- Partygirl
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 1:24am
  Ron Paul 2012. He is a constitutionilist. Maybe if more people read the constitution and Thomas Paine and the Federalist papers they would realize that fact. He is not a nut! He wants to take back our country for our people. Gingrich is just as bad as Obama and any other progressive out there.
  Ron Paul 2012
  Report Post »
bajasurfer
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:30pm
Ha ! Gingrich is koo koo for coco puffs . Hey Newt , what do you have to say about that video that‘s going around showing you saying you’re in favor of the individual mandate ? Oh wait , you‘ll just lie and say it’s not really you in the video .
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
qpwillie
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:29pm
LOL!! I just had to come to this article and be entertained by the Paulies ranting and raving about the name of their god, Ron Paul being blasphemed. Although at this point, I cringe every time I read or hear the phrases, “Status Quo”, “Neocon”, “The lesser of two evils”, “Bilderberg”, etc. they still otherwise provide a lot of entertainment.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:38pm
  Never will WE THE PEOPLE vote for the warwhore BACHMANN.
  Report Post »
- qpwillie
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:48pm
  @THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  
  Sorry, you only make up a minute portion of “we the people”.
  Report Post »
- recoveringneocon
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:55pm
  Willie
  You just got your answer as why the Paulist will not vote for anyone but Paul. What good for the Goose is good for the Gander.
  Report Post »
- WAKEUPUSA2012
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:56pm
  LOL Thats right
  
  QP thinks that george soros is behind Paul and his campaign! Thats the most ridiculous thing I ever heard. Everyone know us crazy people who believe in Bilderberg actually want to elect a candidate they dont pick and choose.
  Report Post »
- Churchill
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 4:49am
  Since I first started visiting the blaze the number of “paulies” or “paulbots” have increased dramatically and the attacks from the neo-cons are getting more and more desperate. People all over the country are looking at Ron Paul and liking what they see. People want their liberty back. Socialism is a disease, and Dr Paul’s the cure!
  Report Post »
- His_Way
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 9:06pm
  Dr. Micheal Savage, again rocked the airwaves tonight.
  
  Should we vote for the Iranian, China, Islamist sympathizer?
  Report Post »
- SaraD
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:29am
  I was cracking up over that one myself. People talk about Ron Paul as if he’ll make it to the ballot. It will never happen. Either he can’t control the content of a publication in his name, or he’s a racist, either way he’s unelectable.
  Thomas Paine was an athiest by the way. His works practically a bible for atheists.
  Report Post »
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:28pm
To my fellow Americans, these are the tactics being employed by our precious MIC to ram romney con on us… How to recognize false opposition (NEUTRALIZERS)NEUTRALIZERS are people who distract patriots from defending freedom.AMONG MANY OTHER TACTICS, they do this by:1. Deceiving patriots into supporting hoaxes.2. Dividing patriots into fighting each other, creating strife among patriots3. Deceiving patriots into creating class struggle by promoting ethnic hatred.4. Wasting the time of patriots, by forcing them to respond to personal attacks.5. ABOVE ALL: Accusing the most effective patriots of being false oppostionRather than wasting time responding to personal attacks, it is better to respond quickly to this foolishness, basically by sending a “form letter”;which addresses anything worthy of comment.Then go back to work opposing tyranny.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- MCDAVE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:38pm
  I totally agree
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:54pm
  Romney was promised the Presidency this election cycle by the establishment. They just did not anticipate the American people waking up the way they have. Gingrich’s role always was to get support to Romney. They knew he had too much baggage from the beginning. Are you going to just follow along with the establishments plan this time? I, for one, am not. I am for changing the status quo (there’s that word again) once and for all back to what made this country great, the people back in charge. If you vote for the establishment, you will kill your future generations of liberty. Do you really want to be the one that is responsible for that? Ron Paul, even after the worlds economy crashes, will fight to regain our individual liberties and Constitutional principles. Only someone who truly believes in these principles will fight for them. I am sure that Paul would sacrifice his life to keep freedom from leaving the U.S. Vote for a true Patriot of freedom, vote Ron Paul 2012.
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:24pm
  Hey TRUTH, we the people know you are a Paulbutz and no one is paying attention to you except other sorry Paulbutz.
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:42pm
  @spanky..your to funny,You must be a paulbot than because you sure pay attention…lol
  Report Post »
Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:27pm
Guess who!? This person is a dangerous choice for the POTUS, This person likes individual mandates on healthcare, wishes to combat climate change, wants to bailout major corps, profits from the corrupt dealings in washington, ‘likes’ Romneycare, has an adultery problem, and agrees with ‘one’ global economy. A Hypocrit that would smile in your face while selling you down the river.

You would think this is Obama… But, its Grinchgrinch.

Sorry grinch… you try, but you just LiE.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:32pm
  the establishment is running scared of ron paul. they tried to show him as weak on foreign policy, but that isn’t workng because the country is broke and we want to END THE WARS (and the fed).
  Report Post »
- Baddoggy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:01pm
  I cannot fully grasp the thinking of the people who are against a strict Constitutionalist like Ron Paul. The progressive movement had brainwashed the masses to thinking a Newt, Romney, Santorum or Bachman is any different that Obama.. They are all the same!! Just a slower road to absolute ruin.
  
  I hate to think what Thomas Jefferonwould think if he could see us now. He would say, the Republic is lost….sad, really sad.
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:27pm
  @texasfireguy
  Our beloved corrupt government ( the same one actively trying to destroy us from within) employs “ spooks” to flood conservative forums and pose as normal people while they push the MIC and elite agenda..most people don’t realize that their are many of these spooks that have been given the task of , distraction, confusion, fearmongering, lying, regurgitating talking points ( like nut, crazy, old, dangerous,nule,iran,) they are not sincere about the TRUTH, their job is to herd the people back into the government pens. These trolls NEVER change their positions when confronted and given facts, they only attack with no proof or facts…watch for them, they ate not hard to see. Not everyone is a spook troll but there are some around here that have proven they are.
  Report Post »
- ArmedPrincess
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:27am
  @Baddog
  
  What I think Thomas Jefferson might say to us, all from his own words:
  
  ” I think myself that we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious. Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread.The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government. God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty….
  Report Post »
- ArmedPrincess
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:34am
  @BadDog
  
  “…. And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure. I have sworn on the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Honor, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them if we basely entail hereditary bondage on them.” Thomas Jefferson
  Report Post »
barber2
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:26pm
Am sure the Obama people are trying their hardest to divide the Republican vote ! Read the crazed Paul comments here! Trolls galore. The Democrats would like nothing more than to create a second conservative Party and candidate to divide the conservative votes. The Alinski Democrats are evil but clever. Other than Character Assassination – last one was done on Cain so that they could use the Race Card again in 2012- the Democrats need to divide the conservatives which they think are dumber than the people who have bought the Democrats ” 99% / 1% ” bad math baloney !
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- texasfireguy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:37pm
  Hopefully, after the primary is settled, the vote won’t be divided. I plan on voting on whoever is running against Obama. Will it be my first choice candidate? I’m not really excited about any of the candidates but any one of them will be better than Obama, aka jimmy carter 2.
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:41pm
  Look what we have here, the NSA trolls our on for another “shift” right barber?
  Report Post »
- texasfireguy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:50pm
  So what exactly is a ‘NSA troll’ ?
  Report Post »
- barber2
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:57pm
  TRUTH: I do not want to see the conservative vote divided and I know that the Left will try to do just that. Whomever the Republicans choose, must be supported. Unless you are ready to start calling people ” comrades,” and joining the ranks of Obama and the Left’s Marxist Third World America… Fine to debate the issues but when I see someone say they will “ write in Ron Paul” if he isn;t chosen, it makes no sense to me ! That is simply throwing away a vote to Obama. VERY BAD MOVE.
  Report Post »
- texasfireguy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:22pm
  I agree Barber but I’m afraid that logic is wasted here these days. This site has become nothing but nuts ranting about FEMA camps, secret police state and the jack booted thugs. And the most important thing here now is whatever you do, don’t you dare say anything that even remotely might be construed as criticism of His Holiness The Ron Paul. The Paulbots and loons (one and the same) will pounce and ruin any chance of intelligent conversation.
  Report Post »
- Mr. Oshawott
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:27pm
  @Barber2
  
  “…but when I see someone say they will “write in Ron Paul,” if he isn’t chosen, that makes no sense to me! That is simply throwing away a vote to Obama. VERY BAD MOVE.”
  
  Nope, voting for the candidate based merely on party line instead of principles is throwing away your vote. Have you not forgotten about the election in 2008, in which John McCain, the NEO-conservative Republican, lost to Barack Obama?
  Report Post »
- circleDwagons
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:31pm
  hey barb, let the republicans nominate a Conservative then we will support him/her. no romney, no newt, no bachman, no santorie, NO Obama
  Report Post »
- texasfireguy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:43pm
  So circle, if they don’t nominate Paul, what do you think will happen?
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:45pm
  @texasfire
  
  That logic you speak of is nothing more than the old gaurd progressive leash.
  Report Post »
- texasfireguy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:11pm
  And what logic is that?
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:11pm
  @ texasfireguy
  ” I agree Barber but I’m afraid that logic is wasted here these days”…This is your quote regarding thecfact WEVTHE PEOPLE will no longer support the lesser of two evils like you were advocating. Electing somebody that is a republican but yet is a progressive is just as bad as voting for obama.
  Report Post »
- barber2
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:46pm
  The Truth: If any conservative allows America to be placed in the hands of the Obama Marxists again in 2012 , they are both fools and a destroyers of the lives of our young . American Survival : means NoBama 2012. ANYONE is better than these jack-booted, Lefty Union Thugs… anyone… United we Stand…Divided THEY win…again….
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:42am
  @barber
  There is no greater destroyer of our young than progressive politicians like newt,romneyconSS, michelle, and santorum which are ALL anxious to have ANOTHER war in Iran. Whose ki? dsvwill be dying over there like in Iraq? Surely not one of romneycons 5 boys. How many THOUSANDS of our sons and daughters have died….for corporate profits disguised as Freedom?
  Report Post »
WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:24pm
Again,
The economy is going down the drain. Our country has been given to off shore mega banks, and congress let it happen.
But the people are waking up. People have noticed, people are talking about liberty again. Not giving our money to the banking cartel. Personal freedom. They have noticed that we have a two party dictatorship. The establishment is freaking out. The governor of Iowa told the nation that if Ron Paul wins, Iowa will be discredited. LOL That is total brain washing. Thats the establishment telling you, that you are trendy and we set the bar for what trendy is. Go along with what we have said. Vote for Mitt, never mind hes been pro choice, never mind hes been for open boders, never mind he was the model for Obama care. Just forget as the govenor he saw over same sex marriages. Vote for Newt the syatem says. Forget that he was pro carbon taxes, pro big goverment. Lobbied for Fanni and Freddy. Hes WAY worse than Mitt. Forget what they are saying now people. They are trying to get elected. Look at what thy have supported at other times in their lifes. Ron Paul is the onl one who is solid. He has been unwaivered for YEARS. He was the one telling us about the Federal Reserve. 5 years ago everyone called you crazy for talking about the Fed. Now people are starting to see. See that this is not our goverment. We have been sold out. Dont let the main stream media control you. Think for yourselves.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- KeystoneState
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:28pm
  Well said Wakeupusa!
  Report Post »
- AZindependent
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:33pm
  Ron Paul won’t lie to you. He has a hard time gathering support from those whom want to hear everything is going to be ok, if you vote for me. Newt wants to be king of the world and would take us to a world government in a heartbeat. He is also crazy enough to think we could win WW3. I will vote for Obama over Newt, if it comes down to those two.
  
  Ron Paul 2012, Restore America (and our Constitutional Republic) Now.
  Report Post »
- Mr. Oshawott
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:49pm
  @WakeUpUSA2012
  
  Absolutely right! The establishment knows all too well that if Ron Paul wins the Presidency, they’ll be facing the beginning of their end. It’s Ron Paul 2012 or bust!
  Report Post »
- spankadonkey
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:31pm
  Absolutely right – the people of IOWA and the state will be completely discredited and disgraced if they select Ron PORKY Paul as their candidate. I have faith they are smarter than that.
  Report Post »
- WAKEUPUSA2012
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:52pm
  Oh so you dont think that the tax payers of his distrect should try and get as much of that TAXED money back? lol your ok with the government taking all our money? sure……
  Report Post »
MCM
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:24pm
Oh Newt! Did your CFR buddies tell you who the real threat to their oligarchy was? You make a very pretty puppet… We know who you are and who you represent… Newt, there is still time to get your soul back…
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Koz469
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:23pm
This is pretty funny because I was thinking that if Newt got the nomination it would be about the same as voting for Obama. Thier views are very similar. I couldn’t bring myself to vote for either of them.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:14pm
  Ron Paul’s newsletters
  “Martin Luther King Jr. earned special ire from Paul’s newsletters, which attacked the civil rights leader frequently, often to justify opposition to the federal holiday named after him. (‘What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it!’ one newsletter complained in 1990. ‘We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.’) In the early 1990s, a newsletter attacked the ‘X-Rated Martin Luther King’ as a ‘world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours,’ ‘seduced underage girls and boys,’ and ‘made a pass at’ fellow civil rights leader Ralph Abernathy. One newsletter ridiculed black activists who wanted to rename New York City after King, suggesting that ‘Welfaria,’ ‘Zooville,’ ‘Rapetown,’ ‘Dirtburg,’ and ‘Lazyopolis’ were better alternatives. The same year, King was described as ‘a comsymp, if not an actual party member, and the man who replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration.’
  “While bashing King, the newsletters had kind words for the former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke. In a passage titled ‘The Duke’s Victory,’ a newsletter celebrated Duke’s 44 percent showing in the 1990 Louisiana Republican Senate primary. ‘Duke lost the election,’ it said, ‘but he scared the blazes out of the Establishment. Paul is unelectable
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:28pm
  Republicorp, Is that all you got? The-Same-Old-Newsletter-That-Everyone-With-Half-A-Brain-Knows-It-Is-All-BS? Hahahahahahahahahahaha. You progressives are really getting desperate.
  Report Post »
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:47pm
  WEST COAST PATRIOT debunk it….. or go away
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:03pm
  Republicorp, Ron Paul is an honorable man. That debunks it in itself.When you look at his record, which I doubt you ever have, you can see that he is not what you evil progressives make him out to be. If he actually was racist, like the evil establishment would like to make everyone believe, you would have a video or some type of recording that could be played. So I put this back on you. Besides the newsletter, which he did not write, what proof do you have that he has even racist tendancies? You don’t so this conversation is moot.
  Report Post »
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:27pm
  WEST COAST PATRIOT did he profit from those newsletters?
  Report Post »
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 12:23am
  Did he vote to make MLK day a national observance?
  
  To me, that was a vote which went against the grain of Constitutionality — but, then, I don’t think the FedGov should have anything to say about that stuff, either. Usually, Paul tacks the same line as I. He must have thought, for some reason, that there was real value in MLK’s accomplishments, or in the symbol and ideals that the man represented.
  
  If you think he wrote that stuff in the newsletter, then square that with the earlier vote in favor of MLK day. I highly doubt that that would have been a vote which would have mattered, one way or the other, with his constituency, so I doubt he would have voted in favor of MLK day, if he didn’t truly believe in the vote.
  Report Post »
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 6:06am
  NORM D. PLUME Lets see Paul’s name on the banned, many written in the first party and his signature at the bottom….. Newt wrote them! I get it. Where do I pick up my tin foil hat and a campaign button?
  Report Post »
Geo Buds Old Lady
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:22pm
Although I have not made up my mind yet on who’ll get my vote during the Primary, it definately won’t be Ron Paul. I did hear Gingrich speak last year while he was promoting jobs and his book. I liked what I heard. Clear plans and strong eviction. If there are staffers out there reading – I want someone that is conservative, believes in strong defenses and smaller governments. I want a Leader, not a politician. Say what you mean and mean what you say.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:26pm
  Hello NSA troll…we see you are always first on the threads to sway opinions aren’t you?
  Report Post »
- KeystoneState
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:31pm
  Reread your last two sentences Geo, and take another look at Paul vs Newt!
  Report Post »
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:36pm
  By all means don‘t vote for Paul no wouldn’t want to do that,he’s the only candidate who comprehends the constitution and more importantly understands the constitution acts as a chain on government power,to keep it from becoming tyrannical. So vote for a progressive or even a Marxist there isn’t much difference.
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:36pm
  I bet 10,000 that “Geo Buds Old Lady” is from VA.
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:44pm
  Geo, “Although I have not made up my mind yet on who’ll get my vote during the Primary, it definately won’t be Ron Paul. I did hear Gingrich speak last year while he was promoting jobs and his book. I liked what I heard. Clear plans and strong eviction. If there are staffers out there reading – I want someone that is conservative, believes in strong defenses and smaller governments. I want a Leader, not a politician. Say what you mean and mean what you say.”
  Gingrich: Will say what he thinks you want to hear to gain your trust.
  Paul: Will tell you the truth even if the truth is something noone wants to hear. Says what
  he means, means what he says.
  
  Gingrich: A true politician who breaks promise like, “I will not let any 2nd amendment
  legislation pass through the House while I am speaker. Votes for two.
  Paul: A country doctor who runs for office because he was concerned about the course of
  our country. Presents a bill to Congress to get the 2nd amendment back to its
  original state but progressives fight against it.
  
  Any way you put it, it sounds as though you are actually for Paul.
  Report Post »
- Scottsman
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:47pm
  @Geo Buds Old Lady, like KeystoneState said, ” re-read your last two sentences.”
  
  You just described Ron Paul.
  Report Post »
Donttredonme
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:21pm
Ron Paul 2012! Newts just upset that Paul’s add blew him out of the water..
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:51pm
  Do you really think Paul will become president once the 10yrs of racist filth that Paul published hits every Lib newspaper in the country? No one is going to buy he didn’t know. But lets say he didn’t know, tell me how can run a country if he cant manage a simple newsletter with a few employees?
  Report Post »
- barber2
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:11pm
  Am sure the Left would LOVE to see Paul as the Republican candidate. I can see the issues for Character Assassination ! ( And you think the Left did a number on Cain ?? Just you wait for what they will do to Paul !! ) The Left is salivating over these comments !
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:54pm
  Republicorp, Read my reply above to you. Paul was working to pay the bills as a doctor at the time, he did not pay much attention to the newsletters except the financial newsletter. He had given permission to others to do this and did not write any of the racial parts. Being the honorable man he is though, he said he takes responsibility for the newsletters even though he hardly ever read them until years later. This is an honorable man. If this is all you have, you are going to lose. To throw the race card against an honorable man is what dishonorable evil people do. Your family should be so proud of you mingling with evil.
  Report Post »
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:21pm
  WEST COAST PATRIOT
  It was only 10yrs of newsletters……. understandable
  I will cut him some slack
  Question, did he return the money that he collected from those newsletters? I would think an honorable man would do that.
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:43pm
  If you had listened to his interview on CNN, he said he would like to see that money himself. Knowing Dr. Paul as I know him, I believe what he says. He is not a typical politician that all of us are used to. If a candidate has to move to the center, left or right in order to get your vote, they are lying to you. I do not know anyone personally, that changes their mind that often. Paul warned of an attack on our soil by terrorists before 9/11 and people said he was a kook. He warned of the housing bubble burst way before it happened, they said he was crazy. The same people you want to elect in are the ones who called him a kook and crazy then, and are now still calling him a kook and crazy now. I think I will look at history and Pauls record in making my choice for POTUS. He is an honorable man, always was and always will be. He is not just thinking about his rights, but yours and mine and everyone else that cherishes Liberty. Ron Paul, and like minded representatives in Congress 2012.
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:48am
  @WestCoast
  If a candidate has to move to the center, left or right in order to get your vote, they are lying to you.
  
  Nice quote..Never heard it put that way.
  Report Post »
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 6:32am
  Ron Paul published a newsletter containing racist and anti-Semitic rhetoric including a claim that the 1993 World Trade Center bombing may have been carried out by the Mossad: Paul is a ahead of his time and a dumb neo-cons like me just cant see it…. but thanks for trying to show me the light! By the way, so if someone that is libertarian moves from his party to republican party ..is he a liar? There I go again :)
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 2:25pm
  Republicorp, A Consercative Libertarian is what the Republicans used to be when they had their act together. Get a clue would ya.
  Report Post »
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 11:37pm
  I get it,.when…. Paul does it for ***votes*** it’s okay
  (If a candidate has to move to the center, left or right in order to get your vote, they are lying to you) < so you didn't read what you wrote? And now you are telling Republican = libertarian…cute move but if you had an honest bone you just labeled Paul a liar…your words not mine. Check and Mate
  
  http://www.alternet.org/news/153551/ron_paul_and_libertarianism's_dirty_secret_–_pandering_to_racist_%22rednecks%22_to_get_ahead
  Report Post »
- SaraD
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 9:44am
  @west coast patriot.
  It is a valid point that RP either was unable to manage a paper in his name, or is a racist, either way it makes him unelectable. It is hard for me to believe that he had no idea what the content was when he defended it, and took credit for it in the 90′s (yes, he even brags about it on film). Even if that weren’t the case, even if he had no idea what was printed for over a decade. For a decade or more did not read his own publication once, he is a very poor manager, isn’t he? so how could he run our country?
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 29, 2011 at 7:32pm
  Republicorp, Thank you for showing us proof of who you really are. Alternet is a subsidiary of Independent Media Institute and is a progressive/liberal activist news organization. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlterNet Oh, and who funds Independent Media Institute? None other than George Soros, Tides Foundation, Open Society etc…. http://www.mrc.org/bmi/articles/2011/_Million_from_Soros_Aids_Groups_That_Support_Promote_Occupy_Wall_Street.html (6th paragraph)
  
  Checkmate to you you progressive piece of, well you know.
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:46am
  Sarad, just had to get my two cents in on your idiotic take. Paul gave permission to some others to do these news letters, he paid attention a little to the investment letter but was busy being a doctor. He was not trying to manage anything. You guys are just freaking out now and will continue to lie (my father raised me that lying is the worst moral thing you can do in life) because you are Progressive Marxists and Anti-American in your values and ideas.
  Report Post »
Churchill
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:19pm
What was Newt saying the other day about being positive? I guess the sight of Dr Paul leaving him in the dust got him rattled! Ron Paul is the exact opposite of Obama. Newt on the other hand is very similar, they’re both big government progressives. Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
riseandshine
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:17pm
Progressive’s favorite phrase….“Out of the mainstream”….reminds me of Chuck Schumer.
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
dissentnow
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:15pm
……Because Newt is a muuuch better choice, right?

Go away, Newt, and take the rest of the neocons with you!
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Churchill
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:14pm
Newt is getting desperate. He’s done! The fact that some conservatives even considered voting for that progressive is depressing!
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Scottsman
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:11pm
Newt is done. Stick a fork in him.
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
martinez012577
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:09pm
Of course Gingrich thinks that, his views are for global government. Ron Paul is for America.

Ron Paul 2012. Even if I have to write his name in.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- American Soldier (Separated)
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:13pm
  Outside of mainstream views? HELL YES! Mainstream = Status Quo and what the hell has that gotten us?
  
  Straight answers? When has he ever NOT given straight answers?!
  
  He has disavowed the newsletters. What more is there to do?
  
  I love seeing Ron Paul’s name more and more. Keep trying to smear him! Just more publicity.
  Report Post »
- Cause4Liberty
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:19pm
  Grinch says Paul is a bad choice? Ha. The dangerous choice is for the candidate who likes individual mandates on healthcare, who wishes to combat climate change, who wants to bailout major corps, who profits from the corrupt dealings in washington, who ‘likes’ Romneycare, and someone who has an adultery problem. A serial Hypocrit that would smile in your face while selling you down the river.
  
  I’ll stick to Ron Paul. How many supporters did you, Mr.Grinch, speak to in VA? 10? maybe 15 people? LoL. I think maybe Republicrap, Yepimanazi, and irrationalboy were the only ones there. They didnt even bother to put out chairs, cause the ‘small grouping’ could stand. LoL
  
  NO more PROGRESSIVES! NO more GLOBALISTs! NO 2 GRINCH! NO 2 ROMNEY!
  
  R[3VOL]UTION
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:21pm
  So much for Gingrich “staying positive” and running a “clean campaign.
  
  Did you hear Wolf Blitzer ask Gingrich if he would run third party if he didn’t get the nomination? He wouldn’t answer.
  
  Blitzer asked him if he would support Dr. Paul if Dr. Paul got the nomination. Gingrich said ‘no’ — so I guess that means he will vote for Obama! That’s sick!
  Report Post »
- YepImaConservative
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:29pm
  “I love seeing Ron Paul’s name more and more. Keep trying to smear him! Just more publicity.”
  
  Okay here‘s Ron Paul’s name for you… I’ll include in this little Story I read about today.
  
  LIBERTARIAN RON PAUL SUPPORTER CALLS FOR THE ASSASINATION OF OBAMA AND FAMILY.
  
  AND his last name is Manson! Well, not Charles but Jules Manson from California, lol.
  
  You’re welcome for my mentioning Ron Paul and giving him some publicity there [SEPERATED] AMERICAN SOLDIER. Btw, which Chap were you seperated under? Jus‘ askin’. Nothing bad I hope. Jus’ find it strange you have your screen name as “SEPERATED” and not ” former Soldier, Retired Soldier, or even ex-Soldier. Like I said, jus’ askin?
  Report Post »
- barber2
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:32pm
  AMERICAN: just write in Obama because that is what your vote will amount to.
  Report Post »
- YepImaConservative
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:34pm
  >VECHORIK. Who will Paul supporters vote for if Gingrich is the nominee? Well, Obama of course… one way or the other. That’s sick!
  Report Post »
- SFYMP
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:36pm
  It really is time for a third party The peoples party. I follow MY conscience, my conscience says that D and R are the root of the problem. Don’t contribute to the problem. My vote and my families will be for Dr. Paul. I want nothing to do with any NWO…America First!
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:49pm
  Yes, the NSA trolls ( yepimafake and barber2 ) circle in like buzzards EVERYTIME Ron Paul is mentioned, it’s funny to see them sitting side by side trying to grab any bits of carcase to eat, big long beaks, small brains, in fact NEITHER of them do anything but distract from the message of Liberty..hhmmmm..Ask yourself why?
  Report Post »
- Cause4Liberty
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:52pm
  @yepimanazi. Let me get this right, you accuse Paul of saying/doing something that he has NO CLUE of who the hell that person is. You say that somehow paul is involved in that deranged way of thinking because of someone he NeveR knew?
  
  Just because he is for individual liberty, DOES NOT mean he condones or endorses what individuals say or do. Get it?
  Report Post »
- YepImaConservative
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:52pm
  Who is the most negative candidate in the 2012 election race for Republicans? Ron Paul is the dirtiest and most negative campaigner in the 2012 Republican race for president.
  
  Ron Paul has gone negative since day one. He has lied. He has smeared. He has distorted. Ron Paul has so much dirt in his past, he was hoping the dirt he throws will distract everyone from his dirt. But it doesn’t seem to be working. Paul’s dirt is a “chicken coming home to rosst.” Btw, that’s Malcom X, Rearend Jeremiah Wright AND a RON PAUL used phrase. The company that Paul keeps eh?
  Report Post »
- American Soldier (Separated)
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:54pm
  Apparently you’ve never served if you question what separated means. Retired implies I severed 20+ which I didn’t. Ex implies that I’ve left my integrity of my service behind. I am proud that I volunteered to serve my country and don’t consider myself and EX-soldier. I know it’s more known for the Marines, but to me, I’ll always be a soldier. I served my country with pride, even though the overall motives I discovered was wrong.
  
  I was separated after serving my entire contracted term under a full honorable discharge. Infantry, 101st Airborne Division.
  
  What have you done for your country?
  
  Ron Paul opened my eyes from apathy back in 2007 as I prepared to go to war for the first time. I have since spread his message among my fellow soldiers with great effectiveness. There are truly a lot of Ron Paul supporters in Active Duty, including some of my commanders from my last deployment.
  
  Continue to believe what you want to believe. History will prove us to be on the right side of the fight for freedom.
  Report Post »
- YepImaConservative
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:59pm
  No CAUSE, like I said… was just mentioning Paul’s name for the requested publicity purpose asked for by AMERICAN SOLDIER (SEPERATED) in his posting. Jus‘ tryin’ to help the Paul campaign by adding his name to the mix there. Any publicity is good publicity for Paul right? Isn‘t that the way it’s being spun? Jus‘helpin’Paul’sall.
  Report Post »
- YepImaConservative
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:06pm
  God Bless ya’ (HONORABLY-SEPERATED), God bless.
  
  You’re a little misguided regarding Paul, but God Bless ya’ AMERICAN SOLDIER.
  
  Like I said was jus‘ askin’? Thought you may have been seperated due to Combat related injuries or the like… per my Chap question? Was a harmless question from a Retired Senior Non-Commissioned Officer. TY for your Service.
  Report Post »
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:10pm
  @AMERICAN SOLDIER (SEPARATED) Very good post and I commend you for your service,I‘m retired USAF and I don’t know about you but it seems that the politicians constantly calling for war never fought in one and never will.ie the loudest mouth is usually the softest cup cake.
  
  The hubris of politicians using our military as the world’s police force is disgusting and Rep.Paul would put an end to the nonsense of nation building.Good luck to you Sir/Mam
  Report Post »
- THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:50pm
  @seperated
  I salute you SIR! You probably don’t realize this but you have just exposed the fakeconservative. He “claims” to have served and pulls that out on everyone here but you just pulled the rug off of him. yepimafake is ALSO fake military…Imagine that.
  Report Post »
- YepImaConservative
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 10:08pm
  >TRUTH. I like to keep an eye out for frauds and phonies. Always looking for “Stolen Valor.”
  
  You’re right… I’ve been exposed, lol. Sometimes asking a simple question identifies the wannabe’s, but you probably can‘t deduce that from my post as you’re just a “spook detector” right? LMAO!!
  
  I’ve caught a few Ron Paul supporters who were full of dookey doo and disappeared as quickly as a “ghost writer” when identified for the BS service they claim.
  
  You wouldn’t know the truth TRUTH if it spilled all over your GED.
  Report Post »
- barber2
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 11:57pm
  TRUTH ( and I use that word with serious reservations) : What the heck is a NSA troll ? I know I am not a buzzard, despite your poetic analogy. “Distract from the message of liberty?” How about you with your rants? You guys” distract from the possibility of winning in 2012 .” Thus, you are either a Democrat Troll or a wacko conservative which the Democrats hope will divide and conquer the Republican vote…. Well, sticks and stones…
  Report Post »
inblack
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:09pm
Fail + Desperate = Newt
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
soapbox55
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:08pm
I do wish the republican boys and girl would simply promote themselves and their ideas.
We don’t need mud slinging within the party. It can’t help.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- barber2
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:35pm
  Agree. Tired of the Ron Paul Trolls here : crazy Lefties trying to divide the conservative vote. Charlatans: go away.
  Report Post »
- Baddoggy
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:55pm
  I assure you, I am not a F’ing liberal!! I am a libertarian. You would do yourself a great service to find out the difference. Go ahead, vote for the eye of Newt…I will call you a dumba@@
  Report Post »
- chewfatlip
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 8:56pm
  It‘s the Republican’s election to lose in 2012 and it appears that they are trying real hard to lose to obama. The worst president ever and the right are in a circular firing squad
  Report Post »
- barber2
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:00pm
  CHREW: Totally agree with you. After reading some of these comments, am beginning to fear that Maybe some conservatives ARE as dumb as the Obama Lefties think they are ! Could it be the marijuana ?
  Report Post »
- inblack
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:14pm
  Wow – Newt is pretty angry here.
  
  I guess those RP ads have gotten under Newt’s skin.
  Report Post »
- BetterDays
  Posted on December 27, 2011 at 9:31pm
  Barber
  If you think Paul is left, then your thinker is broken beyond repair.
  I’ll say a prayer in the name of Christ Jesus that he heal you obviously broken mind.
  Have a pleasant evening.
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 28, 2011 at 10:35am
  Headline on Drudge
  “Gingrich will make half of the number of Iowa stops announced last week”
  The Bus is out of Gas.
  Report Post »

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.