Glenn Beck to O’Reilly: Ron Paul Needs to ‘Shhhh,’ Gingrich is ‘Big Government Progressive’ and ‘Romney Scares Me’
- Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:05pm by
Becket Adams
- Print »
- Email »
While Glenn Beck was on FOX’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” he had some criticism for the Republican presidential candidates. Beck starting by “shushing” Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and said he sounded like Osama Bin Laden.
“Ron Paul needs to shhhhhh on foreign policy,” Beck said. “You sound a little like Osama Bin Laden at times.”
Wait a minute. Glenn Beck said Rep. Paul sounds like Osama Bin Laden? How does Beck justify that comparison? The following discussion on Ron Paul’s foreign policy between Glenn Beck and his radio co-hosts Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere might clear things up a bit (via GBTV):
“It’s not America’s fault,” Beck said to O’Reilly, “and I don’t think Ron Paul gets that.”
“And he never will,” O’Reilly agreed.
After the Paul criticism, Beck and O’Reilly went through the list of the other GOP candidates and offered their critiques.
Beck said that while former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is the “the best at a debate,” he is also a “big government progressive.” Beck also slammed Gingrich for quoting Andrew Jackson during Monday’s debate.
“This guy has quoted and loved every President I think is despicable!” Beck said.
However, despite what Beck thinks about Gingrich’s shortcomings, he believes that the former Speaker is “right on the Middle East.”
And as for the current frontrunner and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, Beck has this to say: “Mitt Romney scares me because I don’t think he sees the Fed as a problem.”
Watch Glenn Back and Bill O’Reilly via Mediaite:
(H/T: Mediaite)
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 692 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 491 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 343 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 327 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 315 Comments- Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More
- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 327 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 234 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 315 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (632)
LogicalMetaphysician
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:20pmWe are long past the point where the existing system can be repaired. There is no such thing as “reformed Nazism”, just as there is no such thing as “benevolent progressivism”. There is only one candidate who has a consistent history of fighting this corrupt, anti-Constitutional aberration, and that is Ron Paul. He is the only candidate who stands a chance of fatally wounding the evil monstrosity that has over-run DC.
Report Post »NoTalkStink
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:43amRon Paul has some amazing ideas and some really crazy one’s. He will not be the nominee no matter how many posts the Paulettes make. Stop wasting your time and ours and get behind a candidate living in the real world
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:42am@NoTalkStink There is a God that governs in the affairs of Nations. The hell with what the MSM thinks and the hell with what the elites want. I trust in God, not manufactured, agenda driven propaganda. We should find common ground and resist tyranny wherever presented.
The Marxists are out to destroy any Small Government candidate that stands on Constitutional principles, limited Government, free market solutions, private rights, individual liberty, and a strong national defense. MARK MY WORDS, these principles will expose and destroy their agenda. Although, the MSM, radio talking heads, the left, the right, the state run media, and Establishment have tried their best to trash Paul, he has still been able place 3rd in Iowa (loosing by only 3%), place 2nd in NH (leaving the rest in the dust), place within top three in SC, and tie with Santorum in FL.
Report Post »thriceconcussed
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:32amMetaphysics falls short on most logical proofs, odd na me, but good statement.
Report Post »TJeff1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:00amYou would think that all of these media outlets and Repub establishment would want to embrace Ron Paul’s supporters. But they try to outcast him and them. This is a HUGE mistake. Fox’s rating will go down because of this. Also Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity’s ratings have already dropped precipitously because of the RP bashing. About 1/3 have dropped for Rush and 1/4 dropped for Sean. Levin has lost about 1/3 of his listeners as well he has gone absolute bonkers against RP..
They should embrace these RP supporters because they come from all political spectrums. They are economic types that like his economic policy, they are Libertarians that like his freedom messages, they are Republicans that like his small gov. message and low taxes, they are also liberals that like his foreign policy, and finally a lot of people like him because he is a “non political” type of politician that basically stands on principle..
Like it or not he gets a lot of support and these people are young and enthusiastic. The establishment needs his supporters. And yet I read these comments and watch the Fox news debate and get turned off from these groups (like fox and rebub. establishment) that I used to be so fond of..
They can either embrace Ron Paul’s supporters or hand the election back to Obama, your choice..
Report Post »drago
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:17amI think we could all agree that none of these “repub” candidates are perfect, or even what this country needs.But until everyone wakes up to whats going on in DC, and we have an unknown, honest, patriotic person as a potential president, this country will remain by Einstein’s definition, “insane”.Stop looking in the same barrel of rotten apples for someone to lead this nation, its truely not that hard.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:33amI know Glenn has been busy with his new business venture, he never got around to learning anything about our middle-eastern foreign policy.
Pathetic.
He is as clueless as all the Neoconservatives about foreign policy.
Yet they still run their pie-hole, as if they are informed.
Maybe one day he and other ignorant conservatives will learn that ‘Blowback’
means repercussions that occured due to CLASSIFIED operations that the PUBLIC was NOT AWARE of !!!!
Maybe eventually you ignorant people will look into our foreign policy and learn that we befreinded the Taliban, Armed , Trained and Financed them to fight the soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980′s.
The Taliban stated well before 911 that they had a SERIOUS problem with our military bases in SAUDIA ARABIA !!!!
The Hi-Jackers came from Saudia Arabia, NOT IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN or IRAN !!!!
Saddam Hussein was an Allie of the U.S.
WE SUPPLIED ARMS and FINANCING to Hussein before they turned on him.
Nato is responsible for overthrowing “dictators”.
This is how this all started in IRAN in 1952, when Our CIA overthrew their ELECTED leader and installed a SHAW.
Too bad we can make a phone call and have our Dictators Overthrown.
RON PAUL 2012
End the FEDERAL RESERVE, IRS, DHS, Patriot Act, NDAA, EPA and much more !!!!!
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:41amDr. Paul’s advice to Glenny Beck…“shhhhhhhhhhh”…let the people decide for themselves. the people understand Glenny’s motives are evangelically driven, thus, supporting Santorum (’cuz the Beck team cannot openly support their fellow mormon…yet). The evangilcals cannot win…a roman catholic and a mormon…those are Becky‘s guy’s. Gingrich/Paul 2012
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:43amBoth O’Reilly and Beck are in the tank for Romney….this is obvious from their previous statements. I wish the media big mouths would get out of our face if they don’t want to play it straight…but they never do.
Dcjones
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:44amLooks like NEWT IS DONE!! I think his ex wife is outing him tonight about this:
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/317440
“””Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein. “”””
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:47amWhat baffles me the most about evangelicals not supporting Paul is that besides Perry (who will be out soon), Paul is the only Evangelical Christian in the race. There are two Mormons and two Catholics (and very slimy ones at that), and evangelical Christians are supporting them?!?!
I think it should be pointed out that Paul is the only evangelical in the running. Also, most Christians are not aware of the fact that Ron Paul will be, in his own words, the most pro-life President in history. It’s also important to point out that by cutting all foreign aid, Paul will be helping Israel, since we currently give more money to Israel’s enemies than we give to Israel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wnj-5z9NJoY
Report Post »young conservative
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:53am@NOTALKSTINK
Which of his ideas are crazy?
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:58amSo I take this as an endorsement of Rick Santorum by Glenn?
Report Post »Wat Tyler
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:03amRon Paul’s foreign policy ideas are crazy if your views are those of international Zionism.
Otherwise, they’re the views of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison…absolutely insane indeed.
His domestic views are also crazy if you support the police state and are an enemy of the Constitution. Another radical view.
Report Post »Jackers
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:11amRight On! The American people are finally waking up and realizing that our government and our so-called “mainstream” media work hand-in-hand simply to maintain and further the status quo…
These FOX and other “Conservative” pundits calling Ron Paul dangerous are right! As Paul said, “I’m dangerous all right. Dangerous to the status quo.”
Ron Paul is truly our only hope to break up this corrupt two-party/one-party massive monopoly of a government.
Report Post »fangbanger
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:20amif it comes down to romney, santorum, or gingrich vs obama then im not voting. i wont vote for a progressive, be they republican or democrat. hell if obama wins ill at least benefit from someone else getting screwed. if a big government picking winners and losers guy is going to be in office it may as well be someone like obama. ron paul isint perfect but hes definately heads above the crowd on the issues that really count. its a good thing we arent electing a dictator (yet) and we have a congress that could (if they took their positions seriously) temper his actions.
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:36amNOTALK – Let’s hear a big amen to that. FRAUD Paul has one or two good ideas but he has shown no ability to get anything done – all talk and no walk. Talk is cheap and Paul is a FRAUD.
Report Post »CptStubbing
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:52amObama mainly won in 2008, because of his anti-war stance. As soon as Ron Paul is out of the race, he is going to start adopting Ron Paul policies and talking points on foreign policy. It will start to solidify his base, and Obama will win again. A pro-war candidate won’t beat an Anti-war candidate, when we still have soldiers dying in a war. Especially, when you are looking for the youth vote; the ones who are going to be dying.
You can keep wishing and hoping and praying for a GOP victory to oust Obama, but it isn’t going to happen. Be as delusional or hateful as you want against Ron Paul, and his foreign Policy, which none of you seems to truly understand, but your guy isn’t going to win. Your delusion is just carrying over.
The Paul Doctrine
Report Post »hwcmo4
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:53amRomney “scares” you Glen? Santorum openly talks about not believing in individual liberty and legislating morality for the good of the collective… that’s scary.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:03amDr. Paul is the only real candidate. It is amazing to me that people are concerned with foreign policy when we are over $15 Trillion in debt and about to suffer economic collapse. I wonder how strong our national defense will be when we go BANKRUPT? Mitt the flipflop RINO Romney is already bought and paid for by the big banks, just look at his campaign contributions and he is a bailout supporter. Now Perry is dropping out and supporting Gettinrich, I guess they will join forces to support their precious illegal immigrants at the expense of the American people, and Santorum the fake conservative who was defending his anti-Second Amendment in the debate proudly stating he supported and worked to create anti-gun legislation to avoid something worse coming along.
Dr. Paul WILL fight to:
CUT $1 trillion in federal spending his first year in office;
*** ELIMINATE five federal departments and return power to the states;
*** BALANCE our out-of-control budget in only three years;
*** FIGHT gun grabbers, Big Labor, and the reckless spenders at the Federal Reserve each time they try to ram through another powergrab;
*** MAINTAIN a fighting force that is second-to-none while refusing to surrender our national sovereignty to carry out the UN’s decrees.
He will lead on principle in the White House just like he has stood firm for liberty, limited government, and the Constitution in Congress.
If you’re ready for a President who will reject any scheme tha
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:17am@spankadonkey
Tell us, just what does it feel like to be forced to admit your view on foreign policy are much closer to Obama’s, the Democratic party, and the CFR, than they are to Jefferson’s, Washington’s, and Adams?
Speaking of frauds…look in the mirror.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Roy Baty
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:28amRon Paul 3012
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:38amI can’t recall ever needing the guidance of a radio personality to decide who I should vote for, and further, I can’t recall any candidate ever needing the advice of a radio personality in order to speak as they will.
Beck is all about “Hey, just say what you believe, that’s better than lying to me”, but the moment somebody does, he shushes them.
Oh well. Not like I let my decisions on values and ethics ride on the shoulders of another man.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:41amSomeone needs to tell the CIA that Glenn and O”Rielly know better than they do..Guess Paul needs to start listening to them instead.
Report Post »joe conservative
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:50amWhile I love Glenn, it is disapointing seeing him act much the same way as a Karl Rove. I never thought I would have someone like Glenn telling me who to vote for. I think I can figure it out for myself Glenn, but thanks for all the hit peices on every candidate except your choice. You vote your way, I’ll vote mine. It’s an American thing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BVPyIXZzRg
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:50amWat Tyler: Another wise man.. Slowly but surely America is waking up to their most unfortunate situation.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:02am1) thriceconcussed
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:32am
Metaphysics falls short on most logical proofs, odd na me, but good statement.
__________________
Oh I’ve just got to respond to that one – Are you a grammatically inclined? Do you have respect for the fact that 2+2=4? Do you know why two parallel lines can never meet to Euclid but to Lobachevsky they can? Can I really say a statement like “This sentence is false” (the liars paradox) and think its sound. No. All one need answer is “What sentence?”
Why? the different rules of logic say so, like how grammar works: a demonstrative (this or that) is not ever intended to be a referent. Demonstratives only identify that an as-yet-unidentified-thing is part of the sentence. If one uses a demonstrative as a referent – literally defining a demonstrative as a referrent – then tries to make a logical statement without a qualifier about what that demonstrative-referent ill-logic beast is… then one can only fail. Without metaphysics, I‘d think I’d found a big scary paaaaarrraaadox and should get an award. An award of failure is all that is due. This is the case for every single paradox from the religious to the political, to the scientific to philosophical: all paradoxes are examples of ill-logic. Identification and degree of accuracy are the keys. (cont.)
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:03am2) Identity, specifically, the law of Identity, known as the law of non-contradiction on its flip side is what gives rise to the First Science (Metaphysics). Aristotle discovered logic, I can‘t say he invented it as we still can’t define what logic is more precisely than saying it is the process/art of confluent and non-contradictory identity-integration. Metaphysics was the name given to the book Aristotle wrote on this topic; he really called it his First Science; it is that structure within which one utilizes logic (lain out in prior and posterior analytics) to identify things, substance, existence, thoughts and experience. This same First Science gave rise to categorization as we know it in all the different sciences
It’s also why Aristotle is the father of Science and the Scientific Method. Aristotle found that if one utilizes first science/metaphysics – the body of knowledge (and its study) born from Metaphysics – or Epistemology, would be integral to Philosophy.(cont.)
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:04am3) Without Epistemology a philosopher is like a scientist without scientific method. They become a psuedo-philosopher and will do nothing but flounder and make ill-logic:
Report Post »Plato – words are used in a game, knowledge is a shadow, we can never really know anything (one may wonder why he wanted to tell anyone that at all while keeping a straight face);
Descartes – existence is the product of thinking (sorry, I am, therefor I think); Kant – a full system of reason in its ‘pure’ form is needed (sorry, that assumes everything has been identified);
Marx – man is an economic unit, nothing more (no response needed, this is a conservative website);
Sarte – existence is nothingness (nihilism is the final product of Plato’s pseudo-philosophy: if we can know nothing certainly, then all around us is nothingness and there is nothing to identify, nothing to say or write to differentiate thoughts and sounds … it’s interesting Sarte and Camus wrote and spoke so much then.) (cont.)
A Conservatarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:07am4) Those mathematicians/scientists without the First Science: POSITIVISTS. These guys are the liberals of science, the atheists, the ethical relativists and chump intellectualists etc.
Steven Hawkings – We can know the mind of God with a theory of everything (in an ever expanding universe and with relative time, identifying everything as knowing how all particular events happen is illogical; Roger Penrose recently destroyed most of Hawkings life work with some new findings, check it out);
Richard Dawkins – We can’t prove the existence of God (trying to be logical, identify and integrate a non-concept like God, into the intellect is impossible);
every Sociologist and Anthropologist (both widely recognized as pseudo-study/science);
ll Keynesian economists – Man is an economic unit whom can be predicted (flat out wrong and worse than Marx, he at least knew people could not be predicted but stayed mute on that topic).
Last – if it can’t be said in a clear statement and can only be said in a meta-language seperate logic-sign system – it’s not logical. This is why Goedel is wrong and many mathematicians falsely think all of mathematics is bounded by his law of incompleteness – nope! As, if the law incompleteness is true then the law of non-contradiction is no longer indubitable, which will never be the case…
Report Post »I know this was long, but, Philosophy is my passion :)
guido.cavalcanti
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:40am@ NoTalkStink The mistake I made in 2008 that I won’t make again is showing up to vote for a progressive Republican (i.e. every candidate besides Paul). Four more years of Obama is just as palatable as four years of Romney or Santorum.
Report Post »oldjackpinesavage
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:20pmFor Ron Paul to put through his agenda he would first need to be elected. However you think of Ron Paul or any of the other candidatesthey all have some good ideas that should seriously be considered and implimented. to do that acongress is needed preferably one with a super majority (2/3 control of both houses) then this would have the effect of checkmating the overeach of any president. Istead of attacking each other concentrate on gaining that super majority.
Report Post »Trading_barracuda
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:27pmEven slow learners like Beck & OReally should be able to eventually understand that if Saddam ran bombing runs in America for 10 ears, cut off our ability to get food imports and medical supplies and cause the deaths of 500,000 children (on record RE: Madeline Albrite) we would want to get even any way possible.
So this fear they have of the truth is sick and insane.
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:28pm@PROBlEMSOVER We were allies with the Soviets in WWII. The Indians were allies with the British during the revolutionary war. We sided with Iraq when they were fighting against the Iranians. It’s called strategy. This is why you people can’t be trusted in military affairs. You don’t get it.
Report Post »Georgia4RonPaul
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:37pmhttp://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-introduces-legislation-to-strike-ndaas-unconstitutional-section-1021/
What was Ron Paul doing yesterday? Saving our Freedom!!! The only man to stand up to the latest tyranny to be harnest to USA citizens.
While becky and billy scold him. Yall haters better hope this Bill makes it or we all in trouble. If you cant see it, I don;t see you.
Paul the President 2012
Report Post »lrgon
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:38pm“I don’t think he [Romney] sees the Fed [ Central banking cartel known as the Federal Reserve] as a problem.” —GB
Paul need to“shhhh” on “foreign policy.” —GB
Interpretation: MR.Beck told Ron Paul during his short-lived TV stardom that he would kiss Ron Paul on his economic policy. GB likes Paul’s views on economic polic and hsi views on how damaging the “Fed” is to America’s economy,particularly the Fed’s inflationary policies.
On foreign policy Beck seems to be saying to tone down the non-interventionism and maybe you’ll get the hawks on defense on board.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:46pmSquidVetOhio
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:28pm
@PROBlEMSOVER We were allies with the Soviets in WWII. The Indians were allies with the British during the revolutionary war. We sided with Iraq when they were fighting against the Iranians. It’s called strategy. This is why you people can’t be trusted in military affairs. You don’t get it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We were allies with the Russians, but are no longer.
Report Post »The Indians were allies with the British, but are no longer.
We were allies to the IRAQIs, but are no longer.
We sided with IRAQ to Fight IRAN.
Why would we Fight IRAN?
They never attacked America.
Why would we side with IRAQ ???? Was someone Nuts ?????
Sounds like whoever had been conducting Foreign Affairs, should not have.
What a bunch of Disasters.
ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:13pmAddendum
Educated People know these Wars are for Global Elite’s Military / Industrial Complex.
They make Trillions from WARs. Then Their World Banks make Trillions in Rebuilding and Construction Loans.
No Sheeple here !!!!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:33pmSantorum can‘t win because he didn’t qualify for the ballot in several states. I don’t know why the media/and Santorum pretend that he can.
Just read this”
Report Post »Independent Study: Santorum tax plan swells deficit by $900B
http://www.foxcarolina.com/story/16551574/study-santorum-tax-plan-swells-deficit-by-900b
Susan Harkins
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:08pmWell stated by WAT Tyler, who posted:
“Ron Paul’s foreign policy ideas are crazy if your views are those of international Zionism. Otherwise, they’re the views of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison…absolutely insane indeed. His domestic views are also crazy if you support the police state and are an enemy of the Constitution. Another radical view.”
Cannot be better said. I would also add that this Middle Eastern war is not a happenstance, it was planned out 20 years ago by the Elites, to support Israeli interests in the planned wealth consfiscation initiative that is occurring right now.
If you push for heavy involvement in the Middle East and buy this phony war on terror, then you support the Elites agenda for a New World Order Police State. Beck and O’Reilly seem to be doing just that — as well of you Paul-bashing fake conservative Republicrats.
Republican Spend-thrift idiots — don’t wizz down our backs and say that its raining.
Conservative means “one who conserves”. Does supporting a 3 trillion $ U.S. taxpayer-funded paintball war in the Middle East sound like you are a CONSERVATIVE?
You spendthrift war-mongering spoiled idiots make me want to puke. You would be the first one screaming if they raked out 20% of your paycheck to be redirected to the DOD. Spoiled children, you are — pathetic.
Ron’s message of Conservativism, Maximum Liberty, and Minimal Govt are getting out. His base is building — in my book, he is al
Report Post »Anamah
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:15pmBut he is too nasty… too Islamic friendly, so much that is suspicious and there you begun to investigate and search …and booom! you find his relation with the Soros network… and there everything is clear. So please, choose another candidate because this one really stinks!!!
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:23pm@Anamah There is no Soros relationship. Paul has never met the guy, or worked for him. The group created had people from the CATO Institute also. The Institute’s stated mission is “to increase the understanding of public policies based on the principles of limited government, free markets, individual liberty, and peace. The Institute will use the most effective means to originate, advocate, promote, and disseminate applicable policy proposals that create free, open, and civil societies in the United States and throughout the world.” The group was intended for the purpose of eliminating wasteful military spending, not Defense spending.
How is building a 4 billion dollar embassy in a wasteland beneficial to National Defense?
“The 104-acre compound, bigger than the Vatican and about the size of 80 football fields, boasts 21 buildings, a commissary, cinema, retail and shopping areas, restaurants, schools, a fire station, power and water treatment plants, as well as telecommunications and wastewater treatment facilities. The compound is six times larger than the United Nations compound in New York, and two-thirds the size of the National Mall in Washington. It has space for 1,000 employees with six apartment blocks and is 10 times larger than any other U.S. embassy.” Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,476464,00.html#ixzz1jBfHQ7Jm
Paul has never supported any globalist or Marxist agenda, especially one initiated by Soros.
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:24pmWhy was the O’Reilly video removed? It’s not even on foxnews.com
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:25pm@young conservative
Try all of his foreign policy.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:32pm@NoTalkStink – LOL Nice try, but NEWT isn’t on 12 states ballots. Sorry to break you the bad news, but your progressive Newt is unelectable. And who are you to tell me what i can and cannot do. It’s Ron Paul or nobody at all. You bum.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:34pmNotalkstink,
“Stop wasting your time and ours and get behind a candidate living in the real world”
Never, if this is possibly the last round before it is all over, might as well go “all in” on what is right. If you are pretty wounded, and you see the enemy come at you do you try to talk them into letting you live so you can go be a prisoner where you know they will END YOU ANYWAYS?? Or do you take your chance and try to get him before he gets you??
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:38pmThe problem is people would rather real safe and have there liberties stripped away. But me? Nothing scares me and it seems that these muslims scare you neo cons.
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:45pm@ Anamah
Too recap…
But he is too nasty [ how so Anamorph. breaks too much wind? nose dripping? bad odor? -- DUMB STATEMENT]
… too Islamic friendly, [you mean he is befriending them by not using my tax money to kill them? -- DUMB STATEMENT]
so much that is suspicious… [you mean he might be a serial killer? he sneaks about in the shadows? He gives you an evil eye? -- DUMB STATEMENT]
…and there you begun to investigate and search [are you even capable of doing that? Where did you "investigate"? What did you find? Googled it? Keeping a manila file folder full on him? -- DUMB STATEMENT]
…and booom! << [Boom? You mean like a large explosion of truth? An avalanche of transparency? -- DUMB HOLLYWOOD PRETEND SOUND]
you find his relation with the Soros network [You mean, like he funnels money to Soros? That he is a closet liberal with a desire to assist with the NWO? You mean, like he is a double-agent who only appears to vote down unconstitutional bills? -- DUMB STATEMENT]
and there everything is clear. [You mean 'everything', but only in relation to how evil he is? You mean, 'clear' as in: as clear as you are being? -- DUMB STATEMENT]
So please, choose another candidate [ONLY CLEAR STATEMENT -- NOTHING DUMB HERE]
because this one really stinks!!! [Are we going back to odors again? breaking wind? Or evil suspicious double-agent kinda stuff? -- DUMB STATEMENT]
Anamah you sound like a true DUMB Republicrat. Poor you, if you really k
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:46pmHere is what you constitutional loving Paul haters (CLPH ones who claim to be about the constitution)
Sound like to me.
CLPH: Hey Doc. this tumor is killing me..
DOC: Well it is, you only have a 10% chance of survival, BUT we can fix this if we take action NOW. Granted it will cause some major changes in your life, there will be things you wont be used to, but your chances of survival will increase by 70%
CLPH: We are going to have to hold off on this Doc, the weather channel says there is a good chance it is could snow very soon. I think my investment would be better suited in a jacket. I don’t want to catch pneumonia.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:10pmAs for Beck telling Paul to SHHH I can agree with that at times….there are times where I listen to Paul speak and cringe……not at what he says….I totally agree with him…..but how he says it….Paul just calls it like he sees it, and that is great…..but I think he could explain himself better….
Is Glenn Jumping on the Paul wagon (giving him tips) since Rick #2 is going to be gone soon?? But he did compare him to OBL
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:42pm@Ballot_Box_Revolution True. Paul ain’t exactly an eloquent speaker. IMO, it might be because of his age. But I won’t discredit him for that. Heck, George Washington was in a much more bad state, emotionally and physically, while in his second term. Washington said that he found duty to country more important than to self, especially in such a time. If you watch videos of Paul speaking 20 years ago, he sounds great. Here’s one, a bit funny too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi1nxu-Sy-w LOL! In some debates, Paul wants to say a lot and is not able to really express himself, within 30 seconds. If you listen to his speeches, he is able to make more sense in what he’s trying to say, especially when given ample time. There are some things you already know he adheres to or holds principally, so its a given, at least to us, in what he means, while others are left wondering. For example, how many people actually know what he’s talking about when he refers to the Federal Reserve? Not too many.
Report Post »black9897
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:07pmYou’re right. Ron paul is the only one worth voting for. Anybody and it’ll be the same crap.
Report Post »spinwizard
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:30pm@ notalkstink
Report Post »Please understand, when we support the candidate, that we feel, has the best answers to reverse the “fundamental transformation” mess these progressives (D & R) have gotten us into, AND that HAS A PLAN, a good plan for Federal fiscal responsibility, we call that our Constitutional duty.
When you support a candidate, who the media says, “He’s the best chance the GOP has of giving Barry a run for his ($Billion) money, we call you lemmings, and you get what you deserve.
jm
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:02pmI agree with Logical,
Our well-meaning friend Glenn Beck has made a serious mistake in identifying Paul with a secular approach as contrasted with Santorum’s religious (?) moral approach. Did not Dr Paul invoke Christ’s Golden Rule in the last debate in suggesting that we should govern our behavior toward other nations in terms of the Golden Rule? Paul sounds like the Jesus candidate to me.
Message to Glenn Beck: The distinction between us and them is not that we are good and they are evil. As Alexander Solshenizen (sp?) put it, the line between good and evil runs through every human heart. THAT is the truly Christian position. You can‘t understand Dr Paul’s position until you grasp this moral insight that informs his thought.
Dr Paul is not part of the blame America first crowd. He is part of the blame big government crowd, and rightly so. It has not yet been proven that the US had justification for invading Iraq. How many beautiful young Americans were killed or maimed in order to prosecute this as yet unjustified war? Big government and big business (fascism) started and profited from this war. Since when is it anti-American to oppose American Fascism? I thought that was what Beck was saying?! It is not Americans in general whom Dr Paul is criticizing, but Fascists — get it?
In contrast, Beck supports Santorum just want’s to go to war to destroy those “evil” people. That does not sound like Jesus to me. It may get a cheer from a mob, but war is hell.
Report Post »Hossua
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:10pmAlright NoTalk, when you guys nominate your douchebag politician I will go vote for Gary Johnson, and we can watch the USA go further down the crapper under Obama. Wake up and smell the BS.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:11pm@A Conservatarian,
“Can I really say a statement like “This sentence is false” (the liars paradox) and think its sound. No. All one need answer is “What sentence?””
Very well done. :)
Report Post »nomnomnom
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:57pm@COLT1860
Marxism is just an industrial-age rehash of Jesus’s message of giving up material wealth for moral wealth. Jesus is an iron age rehash of the same message given by Buddha in the bronze age. The only thing separating the three is the cultural context the people were in and rebelling against. Buddha was in a Hindu culture and rebelled against the corruption inherent in the caste system. Jesus was in a Roman occupied Jewish culture and rebelled against the corruption in the priesthood and government. Marx was in a science and technology driven industrial culture and rebelled against the corruption of the industrial giants and sweatshops. It’s all about empowering the lower classes against the wealthy by giving them soothing lies and getting them organized.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:29pm@nomnomnom If anything, Jesus was against Marxism. He opposed any type of earthly centralized tyrannical Government. He despised the fierce and overbearing reign the Pharisees and Sadducees had over the people. Jesus encouraged the individual to give from his heart. He opposed the Government, or those in charge, who would oppress the people in order to do what they, those in charge, thought was right. Jesus was all about charity, love, and respect, coming from the individual. We were all created equal, and are commanded to love one another. This created a sense of equality, and rejected the idea of some men being born to rule over others, or being superior to others. Jesus was not against wealth, but against corruption and oppression. Jesus came to reform the heart of the individual man.
“The religion which has introduced civil liberty is the religion of Christ and His apostles, which enjoins humility, piety, and benevolence; which acknowledges in every person a brother, or a sister, and a citizen with equal rights. This is genuine Christianity, and to this we owe our free Constitutions of Government.” – Noah Webster
“In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government ought to be instructed… No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.” – Noah Webster
Report Post »AmericanSince1619
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:10amYou Ron Paul supporters are a piece of work, when Ron Paul repeatedly gets booed while making the same argument against America that terrorists are making.
Even, EVEN, if it was true, and not just a delusional result of Libertarian non interventionism, it is COMPLETELY ASININE for Ron Paul to say it in public. He is a bobble head.
Report Post »AmericanSince1619
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:28amAll it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing. While that is more slogan-ish than I typically like, in this case it is absolutely true.
And doing nothing, pull all troops out of everywhere, don’t care about anything going on in the world unless it happens within US borders is the Libertarian doctrine. Ron Paul would make surrender, and ass kissing of people who want to kill us national policy.
These particular enemies have waged war with anybody that didn’t submit to them for 1400 years. Do you really thing running home and hiding under the bed is a solution?
So how does this play out, let evil run rampant all over the world and when it comes knocking on our door say, gee wiz we left you alone aren’t you going to leave us alone too?
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:19amAmerican since 1619 I see your comments and raise you… just get all the rest of the warmongers together and lobby congress for a declaration of war, whatever nation you want, hell pick all your favorite little dirty nations and get that declaration. Successfully lobby the people and congress for war, make your war party so everyone can really finally identify you fake republicans and democrats… then you won’t have to hear Paul (or the growing populace tired of illegal wars) go on and on about unconstitutional wars, ok punkin?
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 8:39amThe simple fact that the video above was removed by FOX…….Proves a lot.
Report Post »Re: Candidates that I personally have spent my time vetting. My humble opinion is, there are only two options left. Being, Santorum and R. Paul. The rest are just more of the same, big Government and UN,NWO people. Media is taken over and filled with Marxist Bias.
So, I love RP for his Economics, but that he is ignorant to the threat of America, by the biggest threat in our History means he is just as dangerous. He could easily put us into total anarchy which is just as dangerous. If we survive Economically it will not matter, because we will fall anyway by our lack of knowledge to the real threat, which is that the Communists and Muslim Brotherhood have joined forces for different goals. So , I go with Santorum, who realizes we need small limited Government, with” We the people,” involvement and the Constitution being upheld, with our Military Defense strong. He has faith and respects human right’s for all and equality for all. We must have both or we will fall to either. Return back to the Founding Father’s greatest gift to America, is the only way out of this. God we do trust under one Nation and we will be Blessed. If we were to go by the Ten Commandments it would correct all the problems. It is simple and God given. Respect our God given Rule of Laws, which our Founding Fathers understood……God Bless America, United we will stand and divided we will fall.
TheBMT
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 9:31amIts so frustrating to hear ignorance from a source that I once thought was honest and truthful.
Report Post »altops
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 10:08amThen why in the blankety blank does Becks dumb butt strive to have us all reject RP?
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 10:58amWow, is all I can say. I have been trolling over the RP comments. I have to say that we are in for more trouble ahead. This is our youth…I am sad to see such hate and you have given me strength to vote for Santorum. I believe in the Constitution Restoration of America. Freedom for all and equality for all with the up most respect for human rights and life.
Report Post »These RP supporters are full of hate and a bunch of bullies. My way or the high way is what I see in them. People wanting to cast away their precious vote if things don’t go their way. Foolish ignorance is some one that would say that. Is this the ME, ME generation that has been so confused and the indoctrinated generations. You people scare me and could be worse for America than a true Conservative Republican. Who is not to be confused with an Elite progressive Republican that has been corrupted into the UN, NWO.
If you believe in the Constitution, yet attack others for their freedom of thought and threaten to give the vote to Obama. It brings huge suspicion upon your motives. Many of you act like the OWS Group, Is everything fine for you?? Drugs, abortion, atheism, if it feels good do it??? This way of thought will also destroy Americas History of values. It is part of the indoctrination given to you by communism, to destroy the greatness of America. Without morals and our belief on our God, we will fall. The problem is you all lack True American History and the values that set us above all other Nations. NO HOPE LEF
ccr
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:07pmLet me get this right……….Beck is ALWAYS advertising things that WE NEED/GOTTA HAVE for the doomsday, and Romney scares HIM??
Baloney!
Glenn is not very smart if he thinks his (lying, dishonest candidate) Santorum is gonna beat Obama.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:21pmPerhaps we need a “school” for conservative would-be candidates – it would be held very privately, it would keep them abreast of all news, educate them on foreign affairs, and, most importantly, pit them against one another in debate after debate after debate.
Report Post »They would each sign a non-disclosure agreement, which would keep everything confidential, and, disclosure would assure they did not get party backing. (though I am an independent, so I’m just thinking aloud for those who administrate parties.)
Why doesn’t the RNC do stuff like this?
Oh, and hire a tailor for candidates like RP whose clothes don’t fit.
It detracts from stage presence, and we want to WIN !
We’ve got to get better at this if we are going to get good, honest, sincere, conservative candidates, and not just those put forward by their major donors (special interests).
Also, we need to put aside a bunch of cash to back true conservatives.
We are losing the true conservatives from the race, in part, because we all waited to donate until we decided which one we wanted to back. In the meantime, those with deep-pocketed friends stepped to the front of the line, while conservative candidates were left behind, begging for money, while well-connected/funded candidates spent their time campaigning.
Susan Harkins
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:47pm@AmericanSince1619
Playing police with the world and having bases in every country is a red herring, my dear. We are already bankrupt as a country, and its only the borrowing of more debt that is keeping this paintball war in the Middle East going.
Its nice to play tough guy with other people’s money…its also nice to spread fears and create Arab monsters under the bed…however, this is simply the actions of a little spoiled boy, playing ‘army’ with his plastic army men that his mommy bought him.
When the Depression finally is upon you, and you realize that your little pipe dream of “World Conquest” is no longer viable, only then will you start becoming fiscally conservative and realize that you were behaving just as liberally as all of those progressives, that wanted to sling around other people’s money for their own eco-domestic “plastic army men” agendas.
You really sound like a lost cause, AmericanSince1619. I dont think you really understand the mean of “CONSERVE”. Sad, dear — American Taxes will not shelter you forever. Soon enough you will have to stand up and be a man about the world, and realize the things that you CAN and CANNOT change, and focus on what you SHOULD change, or preserve.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:36pmNewt Gingrich once spoke at an Alzheimer’s conference sponsored by PositiveID (PSID), the human microchip implant company that came under fire for injecting 200 Alzheimer’s patients with wireless chips in Florida without properly obtaining their consent.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-42848437/hey-remember-when-newt-gingrich-was-sponsored-by-a-human-chip-implant-company/
Report Post »mocnarf
Posted on January 26, 2012 at 1:01amSo let me get this straight:
Romney gets paid for speaking engagements but the is not “Earned Income”
Romney gets paid for serving on Boards Of Directors but that is not “Earned Income”
Romney gets paid to run the Olympics and that’s not “Earned Income”
Romney does work but does not have to pay “Medicare and Social Security Taxes”
I think Romney has found the perfect way to scam the tax system. I’ll bet there are plenty of other wealthy Mormons that have figured out how to scam the Tax system just like Romney. Though to be fair I am sure it‘s not just wealth Mormon that know Romney’s method of scamming the Tax system.
I wonder what would happen if the companies I worked for paid me money and called it interest instead of wages. Do you think the IRS might come calling on me?
Report Post »lhickma4
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:00pmBTW I think that the only person in the media that I can find supporting Dr. Paul is Judge Andrew Napolitano. I think he is now the most respectable person in media.
Report Post »LITTLESORREL
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:19pmHow about Michael Scheuer who was head of the CIA unit in charge of Bin Liden unit for the CIA. He has endorsed Ron Paul. Google it. How about Admiral Mullen when asked by congress what was the number one national security issue today. He said it was the National Debt. The only one with a plan for the debt is Ron Paul. Think before you talk.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:21pmGlenn 3:16 and the Lord sayeth “THe Golden Rule doesn’t apply to neo-cons”
Report Post »LITTLESORREL
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:29pmLook Michael Scheuer former head of the CIA unit in charge of Bin Liden has endorsed Ron Paul Google it.Also Admiral Mullen when ask by congress what was the number one issue to national security he said it was the national debt. Ron Paul is the only one with a plan for the debt. Case closed Ron Paul has my vote.
Report Post »LibertarianRight
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:06amAnd John Stossel.
Report Post »louise
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:42amLhickma4,
Here is a WSJ economist supporting Ron Paul.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=BjCq6woC_hg#!
This is really good
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:13amWhy does Beck even go on BillO. BillO stands against most of what Beckk believes unless Beck is now for trashing the constitution when there is a time of Crisis. BILLO certainly is for that – watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isd0FlGb_LY
Watch BillO defend his anti-constitutional stance … what a POS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICoiFBWGX4M&feature=related
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:34am@LHICKMA4
Report Post »I agree completely. I have never watched MSM on a regular basis until I ran into his show about a month ago. I have made it a point to catch it when I can now. He is honest and he knows the Constitution. The rest are almost a joke listening to them defend the progressive globalist agenda.
techengineer11
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:47amConsider what you said which is true and consider how much more educated and informed the Judge is than Oreilly Beck Hannity Wilcow and other shills. But Beck knows and understands foreign policy; yet the Judge and the Doctor are clueless.. lol
They are truly a disgrace to the Republic.
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:52amAgreed…
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:07amA leading South Carolina conservative and Tea Party champion, State Senator Tom Davis, will endorse Ron Paul.
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:39amNeil Cavuto came out the other day covertly backing him and saying its not wise for the GOP to belittle and marginalize his supporters.
Report Post »tmbell87
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:57amJohn Stossel also supports Ron Paul. If you want to find people on news channels that support Ron paul then watch the Fox Business Network.
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 9:36amI agree with that and as I said I love RP and the Judge is great, because our Constitution is most important and our biggest threat is Terrorist economic collapse.
Report Post »The second biggest is us being brought down to defenseless and that is also VERY important. Can we trust our CIA and the Highest in Military?? Or are they not telling us all we must know, to know our enemy. Is there a UN and NATO Alliance? I say that there has to be!!! So, I trust our Military, except those foreign infiltrators coming into our sacred Military.
As the Media proves on a daily bases, they hate our Military and they are part of the Illegal infiltrated alliances. Pentagon knew that the stock market crash of 2008 was a terrorist attack with a Soro’s and Osama Bin laden, yet it was buried? What that tells us is critical !!! RP must be put into a high positional economic place in our Government, I am all for that.
The fact that our top people in the Pentagon have been silent is a huge question for me as to the reason and who above them is in control. We need a huge clean out in WDC on election day, that means Senate Seats and Congressional seats, along with the Presidential seat. If our Military is infiltrated, then we must not ignore that and bring down our defenses. If we don’t pay attention to all sides of the corruption and ignore one side, then we will be in the same bad place. Choices are, deal with it all or only half of it. I want someone that deals with it all.
I am going with Santorum for
MCM
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:59pmHey Mr. Beck (and for that matter all Dr. Paul supporters)- great interview link with Dr. Paul’s wife on you tube: http://youtu.be/vBQQyAicXto I challenge you to tell me after watching this that there is any other republican candidate (definitely not M. Obama either) that has a wife of this humility and quality- talk about a great first couple! First impressions mean a lot and wow! Married for 55 years! Happy anniversary in February Dr. Paul!!!
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:30pmPaul’s wife …
Report Post »http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html
LibertarianRight
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:13amRepublicorp, that has got to be the biggest load of crap I have ever heard of. That’s your attack on Paul? Pathetic.
Report Post »NoTalkStink
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:46amDr. Paul has some amazing ideas and some really crazy one’s. He will not be the nominee no matter how many posts the Paulettes make. Stop wasting your time and ours and get behind a candidate living in the real world
Report Post »masters11111
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:25amYour right i have been waiting to hear her talk.His family is decent.Mr beck thats you are cut off.I truly think you need to do some soul searching rather to get people to believe you on your non-constuctive stance on ron paul.You mock a good familyman and does nothing for your credibility.You have become a flip flop.Good will prevail.When someone is doing right people know it in there hearts.
Report Post »LukeJ
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:12am@REPUBLICORP:
Report Post »This proves one thing: Even some virulent, ignorant racists can recognize common sense when they see it.
As for donations: I’d rather Dr. Paul use the money to do something good, than have him send it back so they can buy more crosses to burn or more ammo.
As to 9/11 Truth movement, the movement spans a wide variety of opinions. Many of the victims’ families support a new investigation, as they are not satisfied with the NON-ANSWERS given by the Commission. In fact, many of the Commissioners support a new, properly funded and impartial investigation as well. Not all of the “Truthers” are paranoid loonies. As for the Mossad’s possible involvement, it is a valid question, and people shouting ad hominem attacks like “Anti-semitic” don’t change that. Just because people are suspicious of the Israeli gov‘t and intelligence service doesn’t make them Jew haters.
If you have a rational argument to make, I’m all ears.
louise
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:05amMCM,
Report Post »Carol Paul is so genuine. I love her!
rollthebones
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:16am@RepubliCorp referring to your “Paul’s wife …” comment
Sometimes you have to “Embrace White Culture”….. right?
*wink-&-nod* @Glenn Beck
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:14amRepublicrap is your typical bottom feeder. He can‘t attack Ron Paul’s impeccable conservative record, so he tries the guilt by association method, which is laughable.
Report Post »His repeated attempts are similar to a babbling mental patient sitting on the corner mumbling, with people walking by paying no mind to his presence.
He is an attention starved moron. Let him do his thing. Hopefully a tornado will come and wipe out his trailer house..
Susan Harkins
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:59pm@NoTalkStink
So how do those pathitic anti-Paul posted notions fall out of your head, my dear? Do we just put a nickle in the empty slot behind your ear, and pull your finger, or what?
Report Post »BetterDays
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:56pm@Fellow Paul bots….beep
Report Post »The Judge is the ONLY FOX program I watch, my twenty something daughter watchs it with me and asks tons of questions, I’ve a bit of hope for our future if we can last long eneough.
She also recently accepted Jesus as her savior, man does that make my wife and I feel better for her! Plus since the Lord told me she would, it helps me in mynwalk too!
Any way, Ron or bust !
Arminianism
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:09pmUnfortunately Romney will be the nominee. I hope Paul supporters don’t bow out and sleep in on election day. The focus need to turn to getting Tea Party/Libertarian minded people elected into the house and senate where they can hold Romney’s feet to the fire and force their will. Starting with the progressive ***** here in IN, Lugar…..
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:21pmAmen Brother! I was one of the Neo-Cons in the last election, listening to Rush, Sean. little mark and “nnelG” before the 2 other stooges. Heard them all bash Dr. Paul and never give it a thought, Yep he is a Nut and that was that never even hearing him speak. I just hope I didn’t wake up to late. After listen to these tards bash him There is no way back. Its Paul or Bust for me too. They are pushing the Paulist right out of the Party. A vote for anyone else but Paul is a Vote for Obama, period
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:35pmWow, what a low, classless statement, Glenn Beck. Likening Ron Paul to Osama bin Laden…..wow, just wow.
Thank Ron for voting again the debt ceiling, speakng against SOPA, always voting to lower taxes (theft) and against indefinite detainment.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:00amhttp://www.theblogmocracy.com/2011/09/30/ron-paul-cair-and-the-aclu-agree-killing-al-awlaki-was-wrong-2/
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:48am@RepubliCorp Killing Asawamalaki Kaliyakidonki was not wrong. What was wrong was giving OBAMA exclusive power to order the ASSASSINATION (not capture or detention) of a US CITIZEN deemed under the DISCRETION OF THE EXECUTIVE an enemy of the state. Thanks to Napolitano, you TEA party folks are considered “home grown terrorists” also. Good luck with that.
Report Post »JJohnGalt2
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:53pmThe Blaze did it again. Dammit. Give the whole story rather than selective editting. Why in the he11 did you not put up what Beck said about Perry and Santorum. Like Beck is going to influence who I support.
Report Post »Since the Blaze wants Santorum, I got news for you blazers, Santorum will NOT be the GOP candidate. He is NOT a fiscal conservative. Get It??
Arminianism
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:05pmBeck has said that Paul is the only one that gets it fiscally… I agree
Report Post »Naps
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:03amNo Glenn,it is you and Bill who need to shut the F$%K up. Today Dr. Paul was fighting for our freedoms as he brought forth legislation to repeal the section of the NDAA Bill which will eventually turn our country into a police state. Shame on you Glenn! You are a sellout. Just another tool for the establishment. It makes me sick to my stomach to see what our country has become. To bash the only honest candidate who tells it like it is. Sometimes I think,maybe this country doesn’t deserve a President Paul. Maybe we deserve to evolve into a WarLoving,COMMUNIST,hate filled Land of ignorant brainwashed fools. 20 years from now,we will be praying for another Dr. Paul. But it will be too late. Please America,don’t be fooled by the slick talking heads on the TV qnd Radio. They are paid to divide us,with Fear and manipulation. I used to listen to Glenn and hear him out on issues. I like to give everyone a fair chance. But boy,ever since these primaries started,he has shown his true colors in full force. Now all I see is a pathetic,cowardly,obedient TOOL for the Elite. This country is Screwed if Dr. Paul doesn’t get elected. All I can do is Pray that I am Wrong. We The People Support You Dr. Paul.
Report Post »TeaBill
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:52pmGlenn Beck, I love you, but your bag has been opened. First Bachmann, now Santorum. I don’t even see those two relating other than their fear of the world, and their religious expression. Now I don’t mind the religion, but why you seem so scared of a Ron Paul Presidency is beyond me.
Unless of course you are the same as your 24/7 media background of CNN & Fox News, where their is a near blackout of Ron Paul as existing. I believe your business is also scared and fearful of a free society, as this will mean your business would be less successful with less of a need to view your shows.
I am a subscriber to GBTV, and have generally appreciated The Blaze. Now however, I find myself with limited desire to take the information you present with as much truth as I once had.
I mean this sincerely, but Ron Paul is so absolutely consistent and speaks long before the truth comes to fruition. You know, it is a lot like your programs of the distant and recent past. Come onboard the Ron Paul 2012 liberty train. We need you, and would welcome you.
Other that all that, your Shoe in hand while speaking of the next Presidential Election with Obama, who I believe more every day is a closet Muslim was kind of funny. I don’t care about a persons spirituality, but someone who is dishonest is troubling to be polite. Obama likely doesn’t like to see shoes in ones hand while speaking of him.
Report Post »Arminianism
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:11pmHe spent a lot of time on Monday and Tuesday’s GBTV shows talking about his problems with Dr Paul. I think they would be worth watching if you haven’t already. I think he made some great points…
Report Post »Average_Joseph
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:13pmI think I saw you in the movie “I, Ronbot”
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:29amTEABILL, why are you turning on Beck because he disagrees with you. He has always said that it is up to us to form our own opinion. How many times has he said “Don’t take my word”? So you twist and spin his point of view to justify your own? I don’t understand all of you Paul people bashing Beck. That is what scares the rest of us about you and Paul. No one else has a right to their choice of candidates if its not the same as yours? Paul creeps me out, he makes me feel uneasy. I am not hating him or you, he is just simply NOT the right candidate for me. Beck said tonight on O’Reilly that he would not support anyone but that he would vote for who ever gets the nomination, unlike many of you that would rather give Obama the election if Paul isn’t the one who wins the GOP nomination. Nothing Any of you can say will make me like Paul, but I would vote for him if he were chosen.You made allot of assumptions about Beck that you have absolutely no proof of. Are you forgetting who gave us the wakeup call? Who provided this site for us? Or who risked his life and that of his family to do so? I am sorry but some of the comments of late from the majority of Paul supporters are getting scarey. You know if you hate Beck so bad then maybe you should find some Paul site to get your news and info from. I guess I don’t understand why you stay here on the Blaze.
Report Post »Dutchracer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:46amWell Said PAMELA KAY!
I totally agree with you. Thanks God someone here has the maturity to put things into perspective.
Every Ron Paul supporter that is now bashing beck just because he does not agree with him is frankly being childish and you ate making Glenn’s point that you turn people away from you. Just because Glenn does not believe in your choice you ridicule him?
You‘re no different then the far left that ridicules those who don’t agree with them. This is the very reason why the majority if us that are hesitant of Ron Paul continue to stay clear.
I see statements from Dr Paul Supporters that are vicious and reckless. It seems that you’re hate filled remarks mirror those who we are trying to get out of the white house no matter how legitimate are concerns may be.
Your hatred has blinded you from the fact that Glenn tells you to choose for yourself, but when his choice does not reflect yours, you are the first to tear him to pieces like a bunch of rabid dogs!
So Sad… Wake up America! Open your eyes or we will have Obama for another 4 years!
Convince me and others to vote for Dr Paul by being reasonable and sensible. If we still don’t agree so be it! And if Dr Paul gets the nomination I will Gladly vote for him over Obama just AS GLENN SAID HE WOULD! Would those of you pledge the same if Dr. Paul does not get the nomination. Makes me wonder!
Report Post »You all need to check yourself before you truly reck yourself!
colt1860
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:03am@pamela kay @Dutchracer Thanks for your well intended opinions. I’ve noticed quite some bashing too. Some of the mean spirited comments come from both sides though. Although, I try to stay out of telling people what to post, or comment, I see what you mean. I usually ignore that kind of behavior (from either side) and stick to debating or discussing things that matter. I support Paul’s candidacy, but I have not resorted to personally bashing Beck or his staff, though I may disagree here or there. Even when I believe some articles are bias against Paul, I try to debate or confront the issues and topics at hand. I appreciate the open forum Beck has allowed on here. I know some of his staff doesn’t like Paul, but at least I’m allowed to state my opinions on here. Reason, respect, honest debate, and sincerity should guide us here. We’re all here because we love America. If we don’t find common ground this year, we will be divided and will loose the House and Senate. We must elect TEA party folks, and get TEA party folks to run!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:02amWiki definition of Tea Party (I agree) The Tea Party movement (TPM) is an American populist political movement that is generally recognized as conservative and libertarian,and has sponsored protests and supported political candidates since 2009. It endorses reduced government spending, opposition to taxation in varying degrees, reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit, and adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution. (adherence to the Constitution is the part I like best)
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:20ampamela kay: While Beck and other Neo-Cons are entitled to their opinions they are not entitled to the FACTS. The facts are on Dr. Paul’s side and there is a consistent effort to smear him each and every day in the Media in order to prevent the FACTS from being heard or either to twist his interpretation of the FACTS to the point that he seems as a wacko.
Propaganda can and does work. There’s a deliberate propaganda campaign out to distort and misrepresent Dr. Pauls views. The only problem is that many many Americans understand and are in his corner no matter what Beck, Hannity, Oreilly and other Lamestream Media says about him. We want our Freedom and we want our Liberty as was guaranteed in our Constitution. I don’t know why you and others hate that so much.. Actually I do know why and it’s because you have been brainwashed by FOX, Beck and Media in generaly into believeing that we must surrender some or all of our Liberty in order to keep us safe.
It’s an extremely dangerous proposition. One considered and dealt with even by our Founders but with such an ignorant deceived bunch today as we have in America many are taking the bait. Many like you are simply not able to comprehend the value and sacredness of Liberty. It trumps all. It trumps terrorists and it trumps Israel.
Hope you and others come around but if you don’t be it known the Liberty train is leaving with or without you.
Report Post »Anamah
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:09pmRon Paul is a poor candidate to confront Obama. Paul has a relation with Soros and that is why he seems almost naive almost ignorant denying the so obvious Islamist danger. I find Newt is our better candidate the only one to win Obama more we can have. We can have a conversation with Newt about the problem of progressives with him, we can talk and ask him to explain if he is committed to make a smaller gov. he must talk with Sarah Palin, about how to dismantle this suffocating way Obama has choose, and individual rights, and The Tea Party how to impeach the Obama care, and this Progressive Socialist nightmare we have in place. I think he understand that now. he know America deserve and need to return to her bases and be again the precious country of individual rights and free society to create wealth and happiness.
Report Post »Hossua
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:50pm@ Pamela I will allow Mr. Beck his opinion, but outright lies are not acceptable.
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:14pm@TeaBill
I completely agree. One has to ask, if Glenn supports the two candidates that are the most hawkish about the Middle East paintball wars, and the Elites are only carrying out their long-layed plans of starting a major war in the Middle East (part of the great global Israeli wealth confiscation/redistribution) then one must have to assume that a vote of confidence for Glenn, is a vote of confidence for the New World Order Elitists.
Scary as it might seem — its only fact. Would you trust a news article, opinion piece, or political persuasion coming from a Rothchild or Rockefeller? Go figure.
Report Post »broker0101
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:45pmWhen Beck invites you all to his new place in Guyana, for a reasonable price, of course, I hope you all jump at the chance. Trust me it (or something very much like it) IS coming.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:51pmCool, but only if Harry Reid flys in for a visit… There’s a perfect little Runway for him…
Report Post »BetterDays
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:59pm@Broker
Report Post »Glenn isn’t Jim Jones, and you aren’t Ghandi.
I‘m not Jesus and liberals are socialist utopian’s.
And Neocons are in love with war and control
There, get it? got it? Good!
livedasawsj
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:14amLol…….yes…koresh will be there too!
Report Post »DagneyJD
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:19amOmg, too funny! But I don’t think Beck is willing to part with his worldly possessions just yet. http://www.ideniselustafter.com/2012/01/18/newt-you-fox-are-you-trying-to-sweep-me-off-my-feet-dont-you-know-im-taken/
Report Post »modilly
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:45pmI lost interest in Beck a long time back when he trashed those who had earnest questions about Obama’s background and records. Sounds like O’Reily has managed a complete conversion.
Report Post »bullfrog1940
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:43pmI can judge the worth of a man by the number of enemies that he has. At Fox News, Ron Paul has many enemies who never say anything good about the man. Fox News is sounding more like MSNBC as time progresses. GB be careful what you say or I also will cancel my GBTV service.
Report Post »Arminianism
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:23pmI’m sure he will now watch his tongue now that he knows your upset…
Report Post »WiredRight
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:25pmNot only do they not say anything good, they straight out LIE. Check out this clip from the other day where they say that the primaries in South Carolina are closed and that Independents can’t vote. This is while they’re talking about the strong support Ron Paul gets from Independents.
FOX News is Falsely Reporting that South Carolina is a Closed Primary State
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTpC2seL0xg
girlnurse
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:47pmJesus had a bunch of enemies. “If you are a friend of this world, you are an enemy of God”.
Report Post »It is a true man who speaks the truth when he knows he will be hated for it. Ron Paul is NOT afraid to speak the truth and he’s not afraid of making enemies for stating the truth. Bill O’Reilly on the other hand, bends over backwards to kiss Obummer’s arse and so does MOST of the media. Remember John McCain telling us all how good Obama was as he campaigned against him? Gimme a break! White guilt Progressive cowards!
OlefromMN
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:34pmGlenn had mentioned a couple of weeks ago (when he berated the Ron Paul supporter on the radio show first call) that he is FOR things and not against things. Within minutes of that statement Glenn went on to thoroughly trash Newt, Ron Paul, and since is tearing up all other candidates.
Just who the heck is Glenn FOR? We have heard the agins over and over and it is getting tiring for a lot of us.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:47pmBeck is for the ones that can’t win — the under dogs — Bachmann and Santorum
Santorum can‘t win because he didn’t qualify in several states. Obama would defeat him soundly.
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:06pm@Vechorik
The weird part is that I am AGAINST Ron Paul. I am FOR Newt Gingrich, but caught how Glenn attacks his opponents and felt the need to stick up for Ron no matter how kooky I feel he is. Bachmann has withdrawn and Santorum is now Glenn’s pet. I guess Glenn should be more open in his agenda. He his stretching the truth if he claims to be a positive voice.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:15pmGlenn is for Santorum.. The articles are telling.. Sympathy articles for Santorums and smear for the others. Santorum wants to move the US Embassy to Israel..he wants to stay at war in the ME..He voted to enlarge NATO to include eastern Europe. Santorum is for sending foreign aid to Israel’s enemies..but no more than 12.7 billion. Rick is for policing the world..
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:20pm@OLEFROMMN How can you possibly be for Newt when his record speaks for itself..I could see it if you just went by how great a debater that he is..his historical knowledge and his brilliance..but Newt is a slease bag.. really…look at his record please..http://www.theblaze.com/stories/palin-admits-who-shed-vote-for-in-s-c-newt-gingrich/#respond
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:31pm@ashestoashes
Please pull your head out of talking points. The candidates all have smear campaigns against them. My comments on here are to question Glenn’s sincerity and to notate my support for the candidate of MY choice. Who was your’s again?
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:40pmWhat I get a kick out of is how “nnelG” has this restoring “Love” thing going on. and the Out right lies about all the Candidates except Ricky santorum. He has all of us at each others throats. While he and the stooges bash everyone and having a whoopee time doing it.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:51pm@OLE Did you go to the website which tells how Newt has alway voted for higher taxes..how he was behind the biggest federal land grab in history spanning millions of acres in 1979 ..how he is for the Global Warming Farse and Cap and Trade..how there is another big Federal Land Grab in the works spanning from NM to Montana? Newt is not for the people..he’e for Newt..I was just hoping you weren’t gettting swept away by his ricko swavae act.. As for me..I ‘m for the one who should be reclining in an armchair.the one who said he’d accept a salary of less than 40,000 a year and the one who has a record of supporting our Constitutional rights…I‘m voting the man’s record and his heart…Ron Paul..
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:40amNewt spoke with Al Sharpton, ONE DAY prior to Obama’s inaugaration. Newt is even on video Praising Obamas Historical win and claiming Obama well be great for this country. Not only that, but Obama assigned Newtie and Sharpton onto a team regarding education.
One example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UPuhr8eqn0
Another: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ44xpfSsFY
and another: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXwqYnBqJBI&feature=related
But guess what yall. The US Department of Education has now taken over all LOANs since 2009. Before that, it was mostly state funded loans. Now because of these big govt progressives. Many students now could have up to FOUR separate student loans. How does that help? Newt campaigned for Obama’s Education Agenda and benefited from lobbying for mal-investsments in the housing market!
You’re entitled to your opinions and i repspect that.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:08amOlefromMN
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:06pm
@Vechorik
The weird part is that I am AGAINST Ron Paul. I am FOR Newt Gingrich, but caught how Glenn attacks his opponents and felt the need to stick up for Ron no matter how kooky I feel he is. Bachmann has withdrawn and Santorum is now Glenn’s pet. I guess Glenn should be more open in his agenda. He his stretching the truth if he claims to be a positive voice.
Report Post »————————
I’m not for Newt, but I understand what you’re saying. Glenn Beck said, “I’ll never tell you who to vote for.” Yet, his show is constantly bashing people (and many times unfairly/dishonestly too).
I wondered how other supporters viewed it — ones who weren’t for Santorum/Bachmann. It‘s just like everything else in live EVERYONE has an agenda and it’s up to us not to just listen to talking heads, but to dig deep and search out the information we need.
jose wasabi
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:33pmBeck and O’Reilly need to admit they were and are wrong on their supposed choice of a candidate. I don’t care what they thing or who they choose, they are but one opinion. Which I think they should keep to themselves and just report. Ron Paul is by far the most conservative of all the candidates. Ron Santorum endorsed and campaigned for Arlen Spector for crying out loud. He’s a conservative?
Report Post »Puh-Leeze.
3monkeysmomma
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:54amand he voted for forced unionization….and he voted to raise the debt ceiling five times.
Report Post »JP16
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:26pmWe get it Glenn, you enjoy having Santorum suck up to you and say everything you want to hear. Nothing better than to get a possible critic to overlook obvious issues.
At some point, you have to open your eyes to the fact Santorum was against the TEA Party in it’s purest form. Now he goes on the show and praises it. Sorry, I can smell the BS from a mile away.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:49pmGlenn has never addressed these issues about Santorum either:
Voting for gun control;
Voting to give Social Security benefits to illegal aliens, while voting against an additional 1,000 border patrol agents;
Voting to give $25 million in foreign aid to North Korea;
Voting to send hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood – the nation’s largest provider of abortion – and hand out hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign aid to enemies of Israel.
If Santorum is so concerned about liberals, why did he make this 2006 “wrestling ad” bragging about working with 3 leading LIBERALS?
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCyU5I43_Hc
Average_Joseph
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:15pmVechorik – you are another one from the movie “I, Ronbot”
Report Post »TrueLibertarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:44amGlenn Loses all credibility when he supports a man who says this.
“One of the criticisms I make is to what I refer to as more of a Libertarianish right. They have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulations low, that we shouldn’t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn’t get involved in cultural issues. That is not how traditional conservatives view the world. There is no such society that I am aware of, where we’ve had radical individualism and that it succeeds as a culture.”
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:25amGlenn Beck is a anyone but Ron Paul NWO Rothschild agent just like the rest
Report Post »His mission was always to destroy the Patriot movement from with in.
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:24pmSomething I always notice around my town, I see the PAUL2012 stickers on cars that have COEXSIST, peace now, and one car had an Obama08 sticker. I think Paul would make a good treasury sect. but keep that crazy man from the button, and the oval office. It looks like Romney, but I still don’t like him.
Beck needs to stand up and say who he is backing, but right now, he is just taking shots at everyone. There is no perfect candidate, pick one and lets get behind him. If I had to vote right now, I would have to vote for Romney, I don’t like it, but I don’t see anyone else beating Obama. I wanted Cain.
I still need a noseplug and a shot of whiskey before I vote for him.
Why in a country of 300 million, this is the best we can come up with?
FireOBama2012.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:29pmDarmok
Report Post »“Beck needs to stand up and say who he is backing” are you trying to be funny?
Stopit
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:33pmHey, see there. Even some lefty loonies think that freedom/liberty is a very precious commodity. That only backs up that singular issue as a cross party drawing card, as exemplified by Paul’s beating Romney on all different types of voter blocks, except establishment Republicans.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:47pmI listen to Beck every day, he has jumped from Cain, to Bachman, to Santorum, He liked Romney for a while and was defending him, now, everyone is not right, not conservative enough, tell me who is Beck unequivocally behind?
Report Post »At some point, Beck needs to come out and endorse one of them, or is he going to back a third party candidate?
Not being funny for once, lately, just confused. And out of whiskey, dang.
5emerald29
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:47pmWhy does Beck, Limbaugh or anybody in the news media need to pick a candidate, I seriously doubt whomever they pick will change your mind, nor should it. Americans need to do their own research and come to their own conclusion….I think it is about time we remind Americans of the chicken little story, chicken little said the sky was falling and it caused massive panic in the barnyard, everyone believed what he said, instead of finding the truth….This is what America has become (chicken little believers) and that is a tragedy. The majority in America is allegedly conservative; however look where this country stands today. Is it the fault of the dirty politicians or the chicken little believers? I am sure the answer of whose at fault sits on both sides, however it’s Americans, who keep putting these people back in office. Instead of searching for the truth, people are just following Chicken Little blindly. Why is that?
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:10amFunny. Around here I see Paul stickers along with the NRA logo, Gadsden Flags, and COME TAKE IT stickers also. Some Paul supporters I meet are from TEA party rallies, gun ranges, or even Christian gatherings. IMO, I rather have Democrats support a Limited Government, Gun rights, private property, and free market candidate, than Obama and his Marxist agenda.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:11amConsidering that progressive Republicans are JUST LIKE Democrats, I can understand an Obama supporter (sick of his lies, his war, his intentional collapse of the dollar) to realize Ron Paul can save America via the Constitution. What’s wrong with that? About time America wasn’t totally divided by class warfare.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:24am@DARMOK We are 15 trillion in the hole..none of these candidates except for Ron Paul have any clue as to how to get us out of debt..All want to stay in these blood money wars in which we lose our best of the best and cost us one trillion a year..while giving loads of money to ours and Israel’s enemies.. We are being taken over here by foreign theocracies in our govenment and none of these candidates except for Ron Paul has an idea on how to get rid of them..We vote Ron Paul..bring our troops home to patrol our borders and rebuild our own infrastruture..we cut 5 government bureaucracies…improve healthcare and education and protect our own citizens..while stopping the funding to illegals by 338.3 a year..
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:03pmDarmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:24pm
Something I always notice around my town, I see the PAUL2012 stickers on cars that have COEXSIST, peace now, and one car had an Obama08 sticker
————
So where is this town again? Mars? Fantasyland? Or from your idiot mind?
Your statement would be equivalent to a car that has bumper stickers supporting freedom and communism at the same time.
Nice try, idiot. You have no credibility.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:23pmThe Gingrich ABC special Thursday night is supposedly going to stop Gingrich in his tracks. So curious as to what that’s about. Like I posted in another thread, maybe it‘s something related to Newt’s corruption?
Newt Gingrich was under FBI investigation for bribery
Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein.
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:56pm@vechorik. From the Miami Times. The feds had the Miami dealer feeding them information about the deal for years and got the go-ahead to record a Miami Beach fundraiser scheduled with Gingrich in 1997 where Soghanalian was supposed to get the politico himself to talk about the deal.
But the FBI called off the recording for reasons that aren’t clear, and the case was dropped.
The Public Education Center recently spoke with Marianne Gingrich, who admitted she had met with Soghanalian in Paris, but she claims the two only talked about raising money for a firm she was working for, the Israel Export Development Corporation
So, who was the FBI going after? If they thought they had a speaker of the house under a democratic administration, that would have been a prized turkey if they could have pulled that off. Clinton would have had a Matthews thrill up his leg.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:57pmThe killing tidbit is…………………he leaves the toilet seat up, and doesn’t pick up his underwear. And he snores.
Report Post »mac410
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:34pmAnd apparently there was nothing there or they would have not dropped the investigation.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:14amI think Gingrich made a deal and resigned.
Report Post »BetterDays
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:22pmTo think that Ron Paul would just roll over over and play dead, and that the rest of us would allow that if we were attacked, or our allies is just insane, just plain outright stupidity and so untrue.
Report Post »He wouldn’t even shrink the SIZE of our forces, he‘d just call them home instead of paying people who don’t like us our money. He’d reopen bases in States that desperately need the jobs that foreigners now have.
But you slander and besmirch him, because he’s not “handsome or well spoken”, that just makes the person who acts that way very shallow. And no one who I‘d care to have as a friend if that’s your motivation.
The fact that the TP was NOT about the constitution is obvious to me now, it was about money, it’s always about money.
Sigh, I‘m sorry but if Ron can’t earn our trust and get the nod, I will give you what you deserve, four more of Obama.
demint.disciple
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:37pm@No betterdays.. You’re only hurting yourself.. Bite your nose to spite your face..
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:50pmI think you’re the one ignoring reality:
Fox News panel unanimously agree: GOP can‘t win in 2012 without Ron Paul’s support
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_P4TwYmQ1oA
Ron Paul moves into 2nd place nationally 1/15/2012
Washington-Post/ABC News National Poll:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postabcpoll_011512.html
CNN Poll: Obama tied with Romney & Paul in November showdowns 01/16/2012
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/16/cnn-poll-obama-tied-with-romney-paul-in-november-showdowns/
Poll: Only candidates Romney, Paul Tie Obama January 9, 2012 | 7:02 p.m.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/poll-romney-paul-tie-obama-20120109
CNN Which Republican candidate is most electable?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=U7F3yt2Ot4U
Paul Gains Endorsements from 4 S.C. Senators
Report Post »http://springvalley.patch.com/articles/paul-gains-endorsements-from-4-s-c-senators
BetterDays
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:03pm@Demint
Report Post »Sorry, but let’s just agree to disagree then. I respect you as a person, but on this I’m steadfast.
please give to me what you expect from others, free will.
Average_Joseph
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:17pmanother from the movie “I, Ronbot”
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:16amMedia is dishonest in painting Ron Paul as “anti-war” and I see you bought it without checking facts:
What’s wrong with fighting wars via the CONSTITUTION? We haven’t won one since WWII
Ron Paul’s War:
Dr. Paul supports using “letters of marque and reprisal.”
These are, in effect, licenses to private parties to carry out acts of war. We used them against the Barbary pirates. Almost immediately after the attack on the World Trade Center, Dr. Paul introduced in the 107th Congress H.R. 2076, called the September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001, authorizing holders of the letters to go after bin Laden and other Al Qaeda leaders and seize them and their property. He also voted to give President Bush authority to use the military to go after Al Qaeda, but he has been pressing for letters of marque ever since.
Dr. Paul’s bill would have covered not only past attacks but any “planned future air piratical aggressions and depredations” against us. It would have given the president discretion to pay up to $40 billion in what were, in effect, bounties for the “capture, alive or dead, of Osama bin Laden or any other al Qaeda conspirator responsible for the act of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001.”
Dr. Paul said that one thing he wanted as to avoid a trillion dollar expedition when there was a simpler, constitutional approach of bringing the war to our enemy.
Report Post »MCM
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:22pmWhen is Glenn going to “Shhhhh”? Is this part of the “Truth without an agenda?“ What about the reality of ”Blowback” don’t you understand? Is it so beyond the possibility that you would not even consider it? Talk about needing to do you research- PLEASE! Mr. Beck, you have an agenda, and it looks as though you’d willing risk America for the preservation of Israel… why is that Mr. Beck?
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:18pmDid “nnelG“ just say “as a media person I’m not going to get behind someone”?? You have to be kidding me! And it sounds like he just Threw him under the bus.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:24pmBeck said, “I’ll never tell you who to vote for.” (many times)
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:32pmWhy whenever I see Glenn these days, I picture him and Bohner ,crying together on a golf course ..?? Bill, of course Glenn is doing good.. What, with all the fools that buy into his “ GBTV gibs me money ” bit how can he not be thick in green ?
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:59pmVechorik
Report Post »I swore I heard him say its either Bachmann or Santorum before Iowa. And has he not been Pushing Santorum? In the video it sounded as he said Mitt is going to be the man and Santorum is not going to make it. I know I have not listen to him in a while but, am I missing something here?
Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:31amYes, Beck told voters to choose Bachmann/Santorum — that’s why I quoted him as saying, “I’ll never tell you who to vote for.” My point was — Glenn has changed (and not for the better).
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:17pmi can’t believe i actually used to listen to glenn beck. it seems since early 2011, he has turned into this weird, pathetic cult leader guy.
sad really…
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:29pmPerhaps that’s because Glenn knows the only change to come is continued disintegration, regardless of which party take power. Glenn’s preparing for post collapse, just as he told his listeners some time ago.
Report Post »blackstone22
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:46pmThe only sad pathetic thing is you. Go play with the other loser trolls.
Report Post »Glenn rocks !
chewfatlip
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:03amCult leader? You mean like Paul and the Ronulans?
Report Post »RejectFalseIcons
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 2:54pmSo a post-collapse government is going to be in the position of supplying trillions in foreign and domestic aid and engaging in warfare 12000 miles away? Doubtful.
Post collapse, there will be no foreign policy. If we are preparing for a collapse, as Glenn tries to sell us on, doesn’t that sort of point us in the direction of the candidate who will ensure that, regardless of how bad it gets, that the constitution and the rule of law will be preserved?
Glenn is anti-Ron because Glenn is a neo-conservative. Glenn and Rick Santorum both have a dangerous, expensive, and imperial approach to foreign policy. By meddling in the affairs of other sovereigns and attempting to maintain an unsustainable hegemony against a phantom enemy, we make matters worse.
The progressives (republican and democrat alike) supported the Arab Spring because a caliphate will give them what they want – another cold war held on the brink of nuclear war. This is the endgame for progressives. If they truly did not want Iran to have a nuke, they would have put a stop to it years ago.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:17pmIt doesn’t matter what Fox or Beck thinks. It’s a two-man race: Romney and Paul
Fox News panel unanimously agree: GOP can‘t win in 2012 without Ron Paul’s support
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_P4TwYmQ1oA
Ron Paul moves into 2nd place nationally 1/15/2012
Washington-Post/ABC News National Poll:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postabcpoll_011512.html
CNN Poll: Obama tied with Romney & Paul in November showdowns 01/16/2012
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/16/cnn-poll-obama-tied-with-romney-paul-in-november-showdowns/
Poll: Only candidates Romney, Paul Tie Obama January 9, 2012 | 7:02 p.m.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/poll-romney-paul-tie-obama-20120109
CNN Which Republican candidate is most electable?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=U7F3yt2Ot4U
Paul Gains Endorsements from 4 S.C. Senators
Report Post »http://springvalley.patch.com/articles/paul-gains-endorsements-from-4-s-c-senators
V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:19pmIt‘s funny because I see people on this website saying they’re cancelling their Beck TV subscriptions more frequently.
I think Beck should “SHHH” before he finds himself looking like Olbermann.
Ron Paul 2012. The Gospel of Liberty.
Interject REAL issues Americans care about.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:47pmPaul is the ultimate anti status quo candidate. He apparently, if you pay attention to what his supporters say, has the answer to every problem under the sun facing our country. He is the ultimate conservative, and dang it if he isn’t correct on all the negativity created by war. Problem is, even if he had the chance, the only way he could get anything of his own agenda pushed through would be to utilize and potentially abuse the power of the presidency just like Obama but to the nth degree. Otherwise, his congress, even if it were majority Republican, will not fully support him. Everyone likes a lot of what they hear coming from Paul. His logic at times and on certain issues is flawless, but only a select few consider his intelligence to be sacrosanct. (As if it takes brilliance to deduce that spiraling debt is a threat to our existence, that Government is bloated, and that some politicians like to seek means of interfering in every aspect of American life.) In his moments he scares me. Drugs, a victimless crime? (Every motivation deficient pot smoking moron buys this line of tripe. No thanks.) Our allies are only friends in peace time, because when there is war, they are on their own? We brought the anger of the Middle East upon us by endlessly bombing them, without stopping, I mean relentlessly just bombing them into oblivion?
All I can say is pass it on down, its 4:20 somewhere, dude!
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:23pmIf you believe drugs, or specifically Marijuana, use is not a victimless crime you must believe that alcohol is a crime and should be made illegal. What’s the difference?
The only crime committed in drug use is the fact that it’s deemed a crime. Take the crime out of the production and use of weed, where’s the crime?
Just like alcohol, weed will be produced and distributed for resale. Have it only available to adults such as alcohol and tobacco. Where’s the crime?
If I purchase weed to go home and have a smoke after work every so often, or maybe just on the weekends, where’s the crime? Sure, you can commit a crime while high on weed but you can commit the same crime while smoking a cigarette or drinking a beer, where’s the crime of the actually use?
If you steal to acquire the drugs, you stole, that’s the crime and you go to jail. Just like if you steal to acquire alcohol, what’s the difference?
If you are irresponsible with anything, whether it’s drugs, alcohol, a car or a gun, you can commit a crime. If you commit a crime, regardless of what you have in your system or what tool you used to commit that crime, you go to jail. If you are able to be responsible with these substance and items, then who is there to say you aren’t allowed to do it (or have it)?
So tell me, where’s the crime?
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:24pmThis was suppose to be a response to READRIGHTHERE
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:33am@american soldier, logic does not work on these knuckleheads, psuedo-cons and progs cain’t think for themselves. but thanks for the attempt
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:43amHey American Soldier (Separated)
You do realize the entire war on drugs is predicated on the idea that humans are animals to be spayed and neutered like pets, forcibly injected with microorganism cocktails (vaccines), told what to eat, told what to drink, told when to have sex, told when to procreate, observed the entire time, brainwashed and indoctrinated/manipulated, etc?
All you have to do is an experiment with a cat and some catnip or a dog and a bowl of food. The results are the same. They’re using Pavlovian Dog Training on us to make us bow down and accept their “authority”. That’s why Public School is a wash, they aren’t teaching our kids, they’re dog-training them as prisoners in a Police State. Killing individuality, stifling “questioning with boldness”, causing real intellect to atrophy and allowing groupthink and doublespeak to reign.
Did anyone notice the Pavlovian Dog Training that was demonstrated when the people held a vigil on the 1-year anniversary of Gabby Gifford’s shooting? They actually pulled out bells and rang them. Straight-up Pavlovian dog training. Opening up those wounds so they never heal.
Remember, these type of people don’t consider themselves men to be treated the way they treat other men. They consider themselves Elite Illuminated Godmen.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:23amRe: drugs, porn, prostitution
The Republican National Committee pulled a dirty trick on Paul. According to the Times, Paul was running for Congress against fellow Republican Greg Laughlin, whom he eventually defeated in a runoff. During the campaign, an Austin marketing company called people and asked respondents who favored Paul if they would still support him knowing that he was in favor of legalizing drugs, pornography and prostitution. The real truth, the Times noted, was this: “Dr. Paul said he only favored repeal of Federal laws on drugs, pornography and prostitution, leaving states to prohibit them.”
———-
Report Post »Ron Paul won the Family Values Voter Summit 2011 — uses the Constitution and Bible to back his political positions (EXCELLENT)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wnj-5z9NJoY
cous1933
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:16pmI shhhh‘ed Beck and O’Reilly awhile ago by permanently tuning out their nonsense and instead paying attention to intelligent, honest conservatives like Tom Woods, Jack Kerwick, Andrew Napolitano, and Michael Scheuer (among others). What a huge upgrade. I’m actually ashamed and embarrassed that I ever listened to clowns like Beck, O’Reilly, Levin, Rush, etc.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:20pmSo did I. When O’Reilly comes on, I switch the channel to Fox BUSINESS News for “Freedom Watch” with Judge Andrew Napolitano. I learn how the government trashes the Constitution and news of the day. It’s my favorite TV program!
Love the Judge: He’s my friend on FaceBook and has lots of good posts to read/watch:
Report Post »His Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FREEDOM-WATCH-w-Judge-Andrew-Napolitano/98060777766?ref=ts
recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:23pmcous1933
Report Post »Ditto that. What was nice about this clip is that you can choose Audio only, so you don’t have to look at them while they are talking. It made it bearable. Don’t miss those fools what so ever.
lel2007
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:31pmWell that’s just wonderful. Have any of your new guy’s recommended a candidate?
Report Post »MCM
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:32pmDouble ditto! I guess now I’m getting really worried or should I say more determined to support someone like Dr. Paul when I see even these guys sell out to the establishment… just goes to show that the tentacles stretch further than we think!
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:38pmRecoveringneocon,
I have to admit I didn’t watch the video. As I said I’m honestly ashamed that I once admired these fools. On the few occasions these days when I inadvertantly hear even a small segment of Becks radio show, just hearing Pat Grays moronic “arguing with idiots” voice intensifies my embarrassment. Back then I thought people like Olbermann, Maddow, and Matthews were ignorant, lying, verging on evil, wastes of human flesh. While my view of them has softened only slightly, I now realize that Beck, Levin, O’Reilly, and Rush have much in common with them. Arrogant liars all.
Report Post »blackstone22
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:42pmGet a life loser ! Why are you on this site? Glenn is the man.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:13pmDid Beck teach you to call people names or are you a natural?
Report Post »Arminianism
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:19pmSo if someone doesn’t agree with you then they are fools huh? Beck makes very valid points regarding his problems with Dr Paul. You don‘t help Dr Paul’s cause by just calling everyone that has disagreements with him fools. Your just adding to the stereotype that Paul supports are wacko… If you can‘t admit any of Dr Paul’s faults then your just following blindly… There isn’t one politician that I agree with all their positions or beliefs….
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:30pmcous1933
Report Post »It was the name calling and the disrespect that made me stop listening. It started with Rush, then Sean, and move to “nnelG and his stooges. One by one I stop listening. I must admit I was to lazy to read the post so I listened. I hope the rest of the cult can forgive me. but the whole transcript of the video is not there. for some reason.
cous1933
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:42pmArminian,
My referring to them as fools is not because I disagree with their opinions, it is because they either completely misunderstand, or (more likely) deliberately misrepresent Pauls positions, principles, and character. For example, they call him isolationist, when in fact he is non-interventionist (if you don’t know the difference, look it up), they say he is in favor of Iran getting nuclear weapons, when in fact he is not, but we are not (or should not be) the policeman of the world, they try to imply that he is a racist and anti-semite based on some ghost-written newsletters that he disavowed repeatedly for years, they say he blames America for 9/11, when in fact he simply warns that our governments actions in other peoples countries have potential consequences, (the CIA, 9/11 Commission, and many military leaders agree), I could actually go on and on.
Report Post »It’s not at all the difference of opinion that bothers me, it’s the disingenuousness. I believe it’s intentional and it is a tactic that is used to fool people. While I very rarely resort to name-calling – “fools” seems like an acurate description for people who distort the facts in order to fool others.
cous1933
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:52pmBy the way Arminianism,
Report Post »Since you accuse me of making Paul supporters look “wacky” – please click on my user name and read all of my posts. They are almost always very civil and rational. In fact I think you are a little more out-of-line calling me, and other Paul supporters “wacko” than I am in calling these dishonest talking heads “fools”
cous1933
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:56pmRecoveringneocon,
As a recovered neocon myself, I’d say your recovery is coming along very nicely.
Report Post »Arminianism
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:10amCOUS,
Your point is well taken brother.. I do have to disagree with you on some of your points though. Before I get into it, know that my beliefs reflect MORE closely to Paul than any other candidate. BUT, I do have some serious problems with him…. I don’t think I have heard many people say that he is in FAVOR of Iran getting nukes. They say that he doesn’t believe that we should have a say in whether Iran gets a nuke, which is Paul’s belief. Some people find this crazy because they STRONGLY believe that Iran would use a nuke on at least Israel and possibly later down the road, us. You can disagree with that but I would argue that its still a valid point… On the racist issue, I mainly hear left wing nuts calling him a racist. It seems most conservative folks, Beck included, have a problem with the issue because Paul says he didn’t realize some of the comments in the letters for years, so how could we trust him to run our country? Valid point I believe.. Another big problem is that he seems to have a bit of a 911 truther in him. I don’t know how else you can explain this popular video of his answer to a truther.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cENpjWNIt-Y
Just know fellow libertarians that Paul is not the ONLY answer to save our country. I hate knowing that Romney will be our nominee but I’m not just going to lay down and let our country slide into the abyss and say “see I told you.” We need to fight on all levels of government to get our freedoms back.
Report Post »Arminianism
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:17amCous, I never said Ron Paul supporters are wacky. I said that kind of name calling was why some people think they are wacky. I’ve got a lot of respect for Glen but it does bother me when he gets on Paul supporters at times, even though I’m not one of them. I do think he has made some valid points against Ron Paul on GBTV on Monday and Tuesday’s shows. We need to understand that we have far more common ground between conservatives and libertarians and need to stop tearing each other down because of a handful of issues..
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:55am@blackstone
LOL so you dont like debate? Most of us now only come here to try and get people to understand what situation our country is in. Glenn opened my eyes to what was going on. He showed me how to do my own research and to keep digging. So I did, and what did I find. I found Ron Paul stood for everything that Glenn Beck talked about for 2.5 years on Fox. Now Glenn is a sell out. If Glenn had any backbone he would not be supporting a guy like Santorum.
Look, We are voting for Ron Paul regardless. You can either vote with us. Or who ever you pick will LOSE to Obama.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:28amBeck is how I found Ron Paul as well. I learned about United Nations Agenda 21.
Learned to recognize a progressive Republican (which is the same as a Democrat).
Learned to recognize those that want to trash the Constitution (Democrats and some Republicans).
Came to believe that the Constitution can save America.
Now, I hear Glenn Beck and I just shake my head and pray for him. He’s misguided when it comes to Ron Paul. That‘s doesn’t make me hate ALL of Glenn Beck, just the dishonest/or ignorant part that makes Beck misrepresent Ron Paul.
Report Post »Jude 4
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:15pmMr O’Reilly: “we’ve eliminated Ron Paul”. This is the objective reporter?! Astonishing pride.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:21pmO’Reilly bragged that his “loofa experience” hasn’t harmed his ratings. He thinks he can get away with anything. Loofa Bill will have his downfall one day. I hope I’m around to see it.
Report Post »BetterDays
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:40pmYea we’ve entered the “all spun zone”, we are well and truely toasted, with the Socialist Left seeking utopian failure on one side and the NeoCons seeking Fascist warmongering on the other.
Report Post »True conservatives don’t have many media outlets, and the ones we do have are overrun with federally funded whack jobs posing as conservative posters. They spew such fecal matter, I don‘t even bother to post when I read the articles because I’d feel tainted to be seen near them. You know, the government trolls spewing 77 lines of 7′s, or racist rants saying “ can we shoot them” like a psycho “ burn notice ” cast offs, sigh.
( GOD my Father I know your word, I try so hard to do your word, I have the testimony of your Son Jesus, please give us one Season of Freedom Lord so those who don’t know it will know it, but as you will Lord and not as I will. even so Lord come soon. Jesus, truely. )
Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:15pmWonder why Beck loves way so much? Doesn’t seem Christian to me.
James 1:25
Report Post »“Whoever looks into the perfect law of liberty,
and continues in it, he being not a forgetful hearer,
but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.”
Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:26pmsupposed to read: “Wonder why Beck loves WAR so much….”
Report Post »ralrecord
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:26pmBeck is a Mormon.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:48pm@vech, war makes more sense. whatever happened to logic? if Paul is of sound mind with the Fed and domestic issues why would he be off base with foreign issues? if romney and ginrich love big government why would they reduse it? let’s Pray for Glenn, oreilly is a lost cause
Report Post »Jude 4
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:11pmMr Paul has said repeatedly that the Osama attacks had nothing to do with the US citizens, but that Gov. policy played a part in the motive and incentive. To deny this is simply foolish and stubborn. Mr Beck claims to be a resonably objective person, but shows quite the opposite with regard to Mr Paul
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:25pm“Blowback” is a CIA term first used in March 1954 in a recently declassified report on the 1953 operation to overthrow the government of Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran. It is a metaphor for the unintended consequences of the US government’s international activities that have been kept secret from the American people. The CIA’s fears that there might ultimately be some blowback from its egregious interference in the affairs of Iran were well founded. Installing the Shah in power brought twenty-five years of tyranny and repression to the Iranian people and elicited the Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolution. The staff of the American embassy in Teheran was held hostage for more than a year. This misguided “covert operation” of the US government helped convince many capable people throughout the Islamic world that the United States was an implacable enemy.
Report Post »Stopit
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:25pmIt is really not Ron Paul saying that. He’s just repeating the federal government intelligence reports on the subject.
It really doesn’t matter. Sometimes it gets to a point of being a religious preference, and no amount of factual discussion will alter the opionion. It certainly appears the “religious” types opose Dr. Paul. Religion doesn’t do anything but damn self righteous people…it takes salvation by the grace and mercy of God to lift the blinders of he self-deceived.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:37pmAmerica’s government consists of representative for the people (at least that was the plan), there is no separation of a country’s people and its elected government. Osama didn‘t kill America’s government or its policies. He killed American citizens.
Report Post »passenger
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:17pmGreat points in both posts above.
There is a very long laundry list of countries where the U.S. – specifically by operation of the C.I.A. – has screwed over countries. We have disrupted them, destabilized them, supported despots in them and then, quite often, stabbed them in the back even when we were ostensibly ‘friends’.
Unfortunately, many Americans have either very short memories or don’t read their history. Beck claims to “know” history. I agree that he does seem to know quite a bit and at the very least is an eager student. However, when it comes to the more despicable parts of our recent history he seems all too quick to turn a blind eye to our sins.
As stated above, to deny what Paul says is either foolish or just stubborn. No credible claim can be made that the U.S. did not pursue misguided policies that were disastrous for many other nations. And then we beat our chests and wonder why they hate us?
Report Post »kwolfburg
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:10pmSo he is going to vote for Santorum? He is nothing more than another big goverment republican.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:13pmSantorum can’t win, no matter who endorses him.
It’s a matter of delegates. Santorum, didn’t get on the ballot in Virginia or the District of Columbia. His campaign also filed incomplete slates of delegates in Illinois and Ohio, which could limit his ability to win delegates in those key states. Obama would win against him.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/53297511-68/ballot-delegates-candidates-primary.html.csp
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:27pmkwolfburg
Report Post »Listen again, he just threw Santorum under the Bus. or maybe I heard it wrong. Listen again and report back, I just cant take listening to those 2 stooges again.
riseandshine
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:58amBeck wants Obama to get re-elected.
Report Post »Wdawg
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:09pmWhat’s new? Glenn loves to trash Paul.
Report Post »sambachico
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 11:41pmExactly. He does this day in, day out. I’d prefer at this point to not even give theblaze traffic except to defend Paul against many who absolutely hate him. While Beck rails for those on their flip-flopping and inconsistencies, I could say the same for Beck himself on foreign policy when he was with fox, and how poorly he treats a true constitutionalist versus a guy like Santorum who is 100% a remake of George HW Bush, without the texas accent. I feel Glenn left the reservation about a year ago and should probably just move to Israel, as it’s his chief concern anyways. Christians know that God never breaks his promise, and that God will always protect Israel. God also loves justice and humility, and honesty. The only guy running who has a good record (even if you agree that the newsletters are blown out of proportion) is Ron Paul. The remainder of these guys are simply part of the good-ole boy network who care about power and money. They don’t care about our constitution or rule of law, and it’s amazing how many people still plugged into the neocon matrix over at fox news believe that Iran is the biggest problem America faces and the rest of the world. They believe that Iran affects our freedom, liberty, way of life even more than our monetary policy. These issues are simply distractions that continue to deflect the real truth – that our own government is the greatest enemy of our way of life, freedom and our chidren’s future. Just look at SOPA/NDAA.
Report Post »