Politics
GOP Debate #20 in 100 Seconds
- Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:34am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Keep in mind this montage is assembled by the sincerely left-leaning and friendly folks at Talking Points Memo:





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
ambrosia
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:55pmHa!
“Cheerful” Gingrich !
He’s got ALL the attributes of a GREAT leader-
Wisdom
Strength
Wit
Resolve
The answer is so simple, America-
in order to beat Obama, we need to nominate Gingrich.
He connects with the American people.
Willard Romney is a clumsy clod, a blithering idiot, a rich man’s fool & the RNC’s tool.
NO Willard, NO Romney, NO Way !
Something tells me, Gingrich will be, one of the greatest presidents, EVER !
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:04pmAre you serious?
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:27pmShow me the connection with the Bishop….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHaMqHh5NZ4
What part of this real life Romney do you connect with?
I know you connect with the Teleprompter Speeches
I know you connect with the rehearsed attacks at the debates
I know you connect when Newt answers first at the debates and Romney says he agrees with Newt
I know you connect when he says he spent his life in the private sector
I know you connect with Willard Saving i.e. Bailing Out the Olympics.
This is Willard off teleprompter like Joe Biden and Obama…. Where do you connect with Willard.
Do you love Cars
Do you think the trees are the right height
Maybe you love Lakes and not just the Great ones but the little ones dotting the state.
You want to know who Romney is watch the link above..
Romney will not go on Rush
Romney will not go on Mark Levin
Romney will not go on Beck’s shows… (don’t know why Glenn Fat and Stupid would never disrespect at Bishop!)
Romney will not go on any show where they have not had planned questions.
Very active in his church, he served as ward bishop and later stake president in his area.
Report Post »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney
justangry
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:53pmI really like the idea of a draft. No more deferments for college kids though. That ought to shake the neoconservatism out of some folks. Besides I’m tired of the government sending kids with PTSD, on anti-depresants, back into combat and having them off themselves. All you Ricky supporters should think about what his warmongering will do to the family unit. 62% of military marriages are ending in divorse these days. Not to mention all the other psycological issues and other disabilities they have to deal with once that get home. You think the VA is helping these people out, but your dead WRONG there. We’re discarded like every day garbage.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:07pmNo, I disagree with a draft even if would make American’s look at war in a less enthusiastic manner. I served willingly and the things I’ve seen and done is something I would never want to FORCE on anyone else. We need to bring back our spending, our budget on military adventurism. We need to make war an absolute last resort not a first strike option. If we minded our own business, we wouldn’t need so many people in the military….
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:41pmI don’t really want anyone to have to go through it either. I just want the madness to end and I don’t know how else to get people to realize how much it sucks though.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:41pmIt has been a long time since I learned something about Romney…. You know… Something new.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHaMqHh5NZ4
A little History, I, I, I was born and raised here, I love this state, it seems right here the trees are the right.. height…. uh I like uh… I like seeing the uh…. I like seeing the lakes, I love the lakes, there’s something very special here… The Great Lakes, but also, all the little inland lakes, that,… that… dot the uh.. uh.. the parts of Michigan uh… I love Cars I don’t know I mean I grew up i i u… totally in love with Cars I it it used to be in the 50‘s and 60’s if you showed me one square foot of all most any part of a car, I could tell you what brand it was the model and so forth, now now with all the Japanese Cars I’m not quite so good at it but I still know the American cars pretty well and uh Drive a Mustang uh Iife I Love Cars, I love American Cars and long may they Rule the world I want to do well……..
Now I know why so many people like him… He’s totally in love with Cars….. Long may they rule the world….
He is electable dreamy and presidential. Don’t you think. Ha ha
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:09pmIf that doesn’t define the phrase “Pandering to the Crowd” I don’t know what does…
Report Post »unworthy
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:47pm100 seconds make the debate look pretty funny…lots of smiles and laughter…looks like everyone had a good time! Each and everyone of them would be better than president we have now!
Report Post »SychinLegacy
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:17amI just don’t get it. How many times do people have to point out how Santorum is the OPPOSITE of a “REAL CONSERVATIVE”. How many times do we have to cite all the big government progressive legislation he voted for? How many times do we have to link youtube clips of him saying libertarians and the tea party crowd are dangerous and he stands against them? And yet people just don’t get it.
Report Post »SychinLegacy
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:28amhttp://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/02/22/santorums-big-government-record/ Just take a look people and try to deny it some more. Ricky boy is no better than Obama.
Report Post »Obeckian1984
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:37amwhy not have each candidates answers in writing for all to read ?
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:16pmI love the Ron Paul connection to Mitt Romney… I’ve said from the beginning that the two Democrats in the race (moles) were Romney and Paul…
The two sets of Supporters could not have gotten a better gift than each other. Romney and Paul
Hey PaulBOTS let me introduce you to RoBOTS RoBOTS let me introduce you to PaulBOTS.
I wonder if that Wookiee Pat will now embrace the Ron Paul supporters……. Ha Ha!!!
I love Trees
I love Cars
I love Lakes
Mitt RoPaul
Mitt Romney is so well spoken… listen here. Sounds just like that breathalyzer quote…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHaMqHh5NZ4
Mitt Romney is so conservative that he has teamed up with Ron Paul… This is too funny.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/23/joe-scarborough-ron-paulmitt-romney-alliance-is-bizarre/
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:40amRon Paul may not win the GOP nomination. He didn’t in 2008 either. That’s how we got Obama. And anyone with half a brain can see that the GOP is repeating its past mistakes. The desire to have a man who will grease all the wheels of the elite is just too powerful to allow the man in the street his vote.
You see, you can’t “work with congress”. You have to bitch-slap them until they wake up. 50 consecutive vetoes will wake them up. There is only ONE MAN who will do this.
Honestly, does anyone think America is going to get out of this mess with “just another politician”? You need a doctor to remove this cancer, and that doctor’s name is Dr. No.
Report Post »Obeckian1984
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:34amRon Paul’s answers
Report Post »in 20 mins
http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-highlights-from-2222012-debate/
Obeckian1984
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:38amis that the Jon Stewart version ?
Report Post »Delores at CH WV
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:38amWhat a waste of time.
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 7:02amProud to say that I’ve watched zero seconds of the 20 debates, yet I know everything I need to know about what is happening. Romney get‘s the nomination and somehow get’s Ron Paul to take the Sec. of the Treasury and/or Rand Paul as VP in a brokered convention.
Again, I just listened to a snipet from the commie networks (ABC, CNN et al) that is all and this is what my gut is telling me….. The establishment doesn’t want it to be Santorum or the Grinch.
Report Post »Obeckian1984
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:36amDeception is the key to keeping the NWO in play.
Report Post »Malcom0983
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:00amThis video only showed Ron Paul saying “congratulations” and the stooges bickering for the entirety of the video. At least the blaze is consistent. Not fair or objective but consistent. Ron Paul is being robbed. When Romney, Santorum or Gingrich loses to Obama, I can’t wait for the articles on “liberal media bias help Obama win re-election.”
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:25amMalcomo983…
Report Post »While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I must point out the obvious.
If your candidate, clearly Dr. Paul, cannot convince even the true conservatives,
HOW IN THE HELL is he going to convince enough moderates or liberals to win the election?
I’m not even talking about whether he is right or wrong about anything.
Somewhere out there, there are thousands of men who are right about every single topic. But, they are not well funded, or well connected, or they are not good public speakers, or they wear purple and orange polkadot suits.
My point is, just having all the answers is NOT enough to get one elected.
So, stop blaming those who are not jumping on board with Ron Paul.
Personally, I like most of his ideas, ESPECIALLY his Constitutional stances and fiscal policies.
And, I don‘t think Congress would LET him ’devastate the military’ or whatever the boogie-man tells us RP wants to do. (Besides, CONGRESS holds the power to declare war, not the President)
Just stop ATTACKING people for not supporting him.
ATTACKING people will ONLY serve to ALIENATE them. If you want to WIN THEM OVER, you need to CALMLY and CLEARLY, discuss WHY Dr. Paul is a better candidate.
midwesthippie
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:52am…back at you TOM. (by your own logic) how will romney or santorum win without the independent vote. at least gingrich has a chance with independents. we all know lib’s will vote for Oblameless.
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:34amTom:
The irony is that Ron Paul may not be able to win the GOP nomination, but he is the only one that can beat Obama. Even though GOP folks dislike Ron, he is their salvation. They are currently seeking to loose. Imgaine Romney running against Obama, how’s he going to argue against Obamacare? He invented it! We will hear never-ending stories about his magic underwear. Imagine Newt running against Obama. Newt, while holding many very good positions, is abrasive and can never influence the independent voters, who demand more purity in a candidate. Imagine Santorum against Obama – Obama will tear him apart in milliseconds and the race will be over. We will never hear the end of him taking his dead baby home and playing with it. All three of them wish to WORK WITH CONGRESS. Trust me, that is a prescription for disaster.
There is only one logical choice for the GOP, and they refuse to accept it. They did this last time too, and that is why Obama is president today.
Independents love Ron Paul. He is honest. When’s the last time we had a totally honest president? Can anyone even remember?
If you hate his foreign policy, consider this: 3 candidates claim they will bomb Iran, but we all know they are lying. One says he won’t, and we know he is telling the truth. Same outcome, but in one case we aren’t being lied to. How refreshing. And who wants to send billions to these middle eastern countries anyway? They will gladly hate us for free!
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:52am@Tom:
Another thing, Ron Paul WILL go to war if congress declares it. He would be more than happy to unleash the hounds of hell on ANY country, if only congress would have the stones to do their duty and make it a legal constitutional war. He’s not against war any more than the rest of us are, he’s just against using the constitution like toilet paper. THAT’s where he is different from all the others.
Also, the military overwhelmingly supports Ron Paul, with his “wacky” notions about what the military is supposed to be doing. The military takes an oath to the country, the nation, the flag, the constitution. That is WHY they are pro-Paul, they are simply upholding their oath.
No matter what, Iran WILL get a nuclear weapon. If you have even the slightest doubt, imagine a country even worse than Iran getting a nuclear weapon – North Korea. And what did our conventional politicians do about it? Same thing they are doing now to Iran. And what was the outcome, again?
Misunderstand Ron Paul at your own peril.
He loves peace and tranquility, but he is no coward by any stretch of the imagination. He WILL stand up to the evils in this world, you can tell it just by how he stands up for his principles publicly in spite of some of them them being VERY unpopular. That’s a sign of courage. No one else dare be so honest.
Report Post »Airgun
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:58amRP supporters are robbing the voters by loading the delegate selection process; waiting until the people who vote in the straw poll leave, and then electing each other as delegates no matter how the actual vote count came out.
Report Post »I guess the end justifies the means doesn’t it, puppet.
endgamer
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:26am@ Airgun.. DELEGATES are what counts and hoe you win elections. Ron Paul is doing what everyone has done over the past 230 years. Why is the process a problem now? There is election fraud Ron knows it and the people know it. As Stalin once said, “Its not the votes that count, It’s who counts the votes.” The delegate system balances that out. This is the way to beat election fraud.
http://youtu.be/icccJdoyP2M
If you have a problem with Alex Jones, keep this in mind, Glenn Beck uses Alex Jones/prison planet information VERBATIM on a daily basis and spins it with the Religious Right perspective.
Report Post »bambam1800
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:58amI see this montage was assembled in a way to make Santorum look bad. I watched the debate and he did OK. Newt definately won the night. If a left-leaning organisation put this together though, it tells me that Santorum is the guy they dont want running against Odumma, and to me… that makes him the guy.
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:26amThey don’t need to make a montage to make Santorum look bad, he can do that by himself quite easily.
Report Post »ianmc002
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:40amIt’s the economy stupid. Without a robust economy we have NOTHING. No military, no education, no abortion, no yada, yada, yada.
Our foreign policy DIRECTLY affects our economy. We can NOT continue on this path.
Iran? What did we do when North Korea was securing a nuclear weapon? What about India? China? What about the missing arsenal of nukes from the fall of Russia? And were concerned about Iran getting ONE nuke? That is utterly ridiculous.
Report Post »Matt
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:04amWell, you would be right in thinking that….except that North Korea, India and China would only use a nuke if they thought it was in their best economic interests and they could do it without being nuked back, which they obviously can’t.
Ahmadinejad however, has said, and says regularly on live television, that even if millions of his own people die it is worth destroying Israel, and more importantly to him, destroying the “Great Satan” the United States.
China, North Korea and India developed nukes to try to help further secure their economic interests.
Iran is developing a nuke for the express purpose of intentionally murdering millions of Americans. And again, they have stated this goal on live television dozens of times.
So if you wouldn’t mind explaining to me again why taking a VERY hard stance against Iran is “ridiculous”?
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:48amAs I tell my friends… I can survive tough economic times.
I CANNOT survive a nuclear bomb.
You can’t sell the locks, the doors, and the windows off your house, just so you can afford to keep all your flatscreen tv’s, your ipads and your dvd collection.
I.E., you don’t sacrifice your security just for some TEMPORAL STUFF (MONEY).
HISTORY PROVES ME RIGHT !
IT IS TIME TO STOP SPENDING !!!
Report Post »WhiteFall
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:02amThe Drudge Report; COULTER: WHAT’S THEIR PROBLEM WITH ROMNEY? She makes perfect sense.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:28amSadly, Drudge and Coulter are turning all msm on us. What they are putting out for Romney reminds me of Debbie (Wasserman Schultz). It’s artificial commentary. Its called advertising.
Report Post »I have not read a Coulter column since she started with it. Hopefully her insight will come back after the elections.
Conservative Punk
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:31amI agree with Getlife. I love Coulter, Demonic is probably her best, ( I have all her books but 1) but I have no idea where her head is at with Romney or Christie. If Romney wins the ticket he gets my vote, but there are (were) much better candidates.
Report Post »cantbelieveallthisgarbagecouldhappenwhodoislap
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:33amKNOCK IT OFF !
Report Post »You guys need to stop hacking each other!
TAKE THE FACTS ABOUT obama and his 57 states or 59,the fact that the day of prayer was canceled,he preyed with muslims beside the white house,we have none of his records,his father and mother were comunist,he bypasses congress and senate by bluring the constitution,or just ignoring it,he parties his but off,when hard working people cant buy food,and gas has nessisarilly sky rocketed under his energy plan,he has picked companies to live or dye in the private secter,he has already hired 16,000 NEW IRS agent to impliment his health care bill fines/or jail,he has admitted to his muslim fath,he has said he will back muslims before america(read his book),and Im done typing,cause I can go on with really bad FACTS till my fingers bleed.
GETLIFE
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:16amJust what I think everytime I hear them debate. But you can’t blame them for wanting to win.
Report Post »They should have a different kind of competition: who can dig up the most Obama facts. These guys are all infinitely cleaner than the “dark” one. They should force his vetting by doing it themselves.
jsDway
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:08amI thought Santorum did a great job! I believe he got Romney on the healthcare issue and on the ear mark issue. Romney didn’t understand what Santorum was even talking about on ear marks and then came back and repeated what Santorum had basically said – not knowing that he was even agreeing with Santorum. Romney also didn’t get the last question – the moderator had to restate the question – it was suppose to be the biggest misconception we have of him and he started his stump speech! Santorum did fine!!!!
Report Post »Grannie4news
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:23am@JSDWAY: I disagree, I think Romney put him in his place. Rick received the most boos. He is far
Report Post »too arrogant for my taste and does not look the least Presidential. I guess that is what makes the world go around, we all see things differently The only thing we have to agree on is that whoever is the nominee, we must ALL get behind them and turn out the vote in November. I think they all did basically well tonight.
SychinLegacy
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:23amYeah let’s all get behind white Obama. That way we only have ourselves to blame when two years later WE ARE EVEN FURTHER DOWN THE SAME PATH.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:52amThis was not Santorum’s night. It was more Gingrich’s but because of that Romney was propelled.
If you haven’t seen the whole debate, here it is in its entirety: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2012/feb/gop_debate_20.html
Report Post »cantbelieveallthisgarbagecouldhappenwhodoislap
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:59amThank you.
Report Post »It doesnt seem I am able to veiw the debates on my local COM CAST basic basic cable,not sure why this is? I always thought debates were important,but if you cant veiw them because you cant pay the big money,what do you do,i remember when I was younger and didnt think about politics,you couldnt find a station to see anything ,but the debates.
I get plenty of foreign stations,lots of pbs,one c span,and home shopping network WEEEEE!!!!!
Just seems strange to me.
Yep I would rather watch those rich b kardasions,brittny,low dawg or high dawg,paris,al sharpton,some other retarded money rich loud mouth skin tick on this earth.
I just have a problem paying money to watch crap and not get the debates.
doesnt make since,sorry I was using commen since