Politics

GOP Officials: Santorum Finished Ahead in Iowa After All

New Final Count Shows Santorum Won Iowa Caucuses

Rick Santorum (AP)

COLUMBIA, S.C. (The Blaze/AP) — Republican officials say the final count of the Iowa caucuses puts Rick Santorum ahead of Mitt Romney by 34 votes, but no winner will be declared because votes from eight precincts are missing.

Romney, the front-runner in the race for the GOP presidential nomination, initially had been considered the winner by 8 votes in the event’s closest finish ever.

Iowa Republicans are to announce the tally Thursday morning.

Republican officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to pre-empt the announcement, said Santorum would end up with 29,839 votes to Romney’s 29,805.

Foxnews.com has more:

“It’s a split decision,” the executive director of the Iowa GOP Chad Olsen said.

Officials discovered inaccuracies in 131 precincts, with changes in one precinct alone shifting the vote by 50.

Even before the new results were officially announced, Mitt Romney released a statement.

“The results from Iowa caucus night revealed a virtual tie. I would like to thank the Iowa Republican Party for their careful attention to the caucus process, and we once again recognize Rick Santorum for his strong performance in the state,” he said. “The Iowa caucuses, with record turnout, were a great start to defeating President Obama in Iowa and elsewhere in the general election.”

Comments (145)

1 2 3 4
  • DD313
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:33am

    Harvard beats Yale 29-29.

    Report Post » DD313  
    • ddg7
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:07am

      I get it and you’re absolutely right!

      Report Post »  
    • midwesthippie
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:09am

      and somehow the hot topic on the homepage is: rick santorum taxes gbtv …same as yesterday. really, santorum is the hot topic??? my throat is getting sore.

      Report Post » midwesthippie  
    • joe conservative
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:11am

      It will be interesting to see how his numbers cahnge with Perry out of the race. I think a number of Perry supporters will now turn to Santorum. Time will tell.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BVPyIXZzRg

      Report Post » joe conservative  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:41am

      I thought Iowans were the honest among us? Or was this another example of what happens when DEMOCRAT tactics invade our Party?? Or was it Headwinds ? Or ATM machines??

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • thegrassroots
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:03pm

      “Votes from eight precincts are missing.“ ”Inaccuracies.” And, Romney grandstanding an eight vote lead “EVEN BEFORE the new results were officially announced.”

      Sounds Like Fraud To Me!

      And, BECAUSE Romney was declaring a “win” before the official announcement; Romney KNEW The Votes Had Been Tampered With To Show Him Ahead.

      Thank God For The Information HiWay We All Have Access To; The Snake Oil Salesman / Corrupt Crook, Romney, Can Be Easily and Quickly Exposed.

      WHAT About The Cayman Islands, RomBama? IF You Persist In Your Efforts To Be Nominated; America Has The RIGHT To See Your Tax Returns and NOW! You, RomBama, Could End Up In Prison!

      “Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.” Matthew 10:26

      God Bless and Guide American, In Jesus’ Name!

      Report Post »  
    • JayCee
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:43pm

      How do you just lose the votes from 8 precincts?
      That should be a headline story.
      There is a real problem in Iowa.

      Report Post »  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:44pm

      As a 40 year Republican,, I guess i no longer qualify to be an R. Just after JFK, the last Patriot in the DEMOCRAT PARTY, the SocialistCommunist Cabal took over the DEMOCRAT Party.. Now that I am a Progressive at worst and a Neocon at best, according to our new Republican Pure Race Constitutionalist’s, where do I go?? I’ve never qualified to be a TAKER class DEMOCRAT, they wouldn’t want or let me be a DEMOCRAT. And I am not worthy enough, smart enough, or have any knowledge of why I have become so totally oblivious. As a 53%er for 40 years, I think I am taking my tiny piece of the ball and going off the grid,, and all you pure bloods can pay the confiscatory TAXES that your new elite attitudes will bring in with BARRY”S reelection.

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • thegrassroots
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:25pm

      @jaycee
      The “problem” isn’t Iowa! The PROBLEM Is Romney!

      Everywhere Romney Goes, Mud Oozes Out Of His Shoes.

      Time Will Tell! Those Tax Returns Romney’s Hiding, Could Mean Romney Has More To Fear Than Being Pulverized By Newt!

      MAYBE — Romney, like BHO, could find himself in prison somewhere down the road. We’ll See!

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:29pm

      Santorum can‘t win because he didn’t qualify for the ballot in several states. I don’t know why the media/and Santorum pretend that he can.

      Just read this”
      Independent Study: Santorum tax plan swells deficit by $900B
      http://www.foxcarolina.com/story/16551574/study-santorum-tax-plan-swells-deficit-by-900b

      Report Post »  
    • RebelElf
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:54pm

      Laugh out laude!

      Report Post »  
    • ConservativeCharlie
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:29pm

      Hey but Mitt says they are tied now. Bigger story is they are missing the results from 8 precincts, gotta wonder just how much they screwed the pooch on election night to give the appearance of a Romney Win. Just another reason to vote Paul. The Republican Establishment needs to be outed. Our system has become so corrupt that we cant even have elections without fraud.

      Report Post »  
  • midwesthippie
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:16am

    Santorum finished 5TH in NH primary…the first that really counts as a primary…5TH!!! the roman catholic-sweater vest thing isn’t working. he lost his last election by 20 points. his own state rejected him. let’s move forward. p.s. glenn and team: pull your noses from up inside the evangelical candidates ar$e…that’s not what America is looking for in a president. Gingrich/Paul 2012

    Report Post » midwesthippie  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:26am

      Looks like Gingrich will be biting the dust soon – real soon. The Lame Stream media can be thanked for that. Something definitely has to be done about the lame streamers. Might try a corporate takeover of one of the big three. Any other thoughts?

      Report Post »  
    • midwesthippie
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:41am

      people supported clinton after his personal failures were attacked by the media (probably at hillary’s command) and many people become galvanized against the big media machine for personal attacks. when they go after gingrich for things he did in his personal life over 15 years ago…it will probably not be effective in the way the MSM believes. of course, beck and the blaze are happy to help ABC in trying to take down newt.

      Report Post » midwesthippie  
    • Solzhenitsin
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:00pm

      NH doesn’t count- it’s far too liberal.

      Report Post »  
    • JRook
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:02pm

      Who would even consider the outcome from a state that can’t handle the simple act of counting. Although aprox 80,000 votes across 1,874 precincts, or roughly 43 votes per precinct is clearly an overwhelming task.

      Report Post »  
    • RadicalEdge81
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 3:34pm

      To the numb nut that said Santorum finsished 5th in New Hampshire.
      Big freaking deal. New Hampshire has an Open Primary which means Obama Bots
      can vote in it. And guess who they flocked too. Romney, Ron Paul, Huntsman, and Gingrich
      all the beatable Rino/Liberaltarians in the race.
      Go Santorum!

      Report Post » RadicalEdge81  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:04pm

      Midwest-
      Gingrich is a rotten apple and a hypocrite. We have already had too many of those in the white house. I really can’t understand how anybody could think to vote for this kind of trash. Is that the kind of ethic’s that represent you?

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 5:40pm

      @ Midwesthippie
      Santorum won Iowa (how did Newt do, again?) and Santorum got 9.4% of the vote in New Hampshire (how did Newt do? Oh, that’s right — 9.4% of the vote). In national polls, Santorum‘s positive rating is in the 30’s and his negatives are in the 30′s. Newt‘s positives are in the 30’s and his negatives are in the 50′s. Now, we a learning more of what a lecherous creep Newt is. And Perry endorses Newt? Well, we always new that Perry was never the shaprest tool in the shed. He flunks (two times) a required course for his preferred major in college. His latest move gets an “F” as well.

      Report Post »  
  • marvel
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:15am

    You guys are funny. Iowa was close. I think the New Hampshire Primary is a better indicator, and there is no sign of your conspiracies…

    Mitt Romney 97,532 39.3%
    Ron Paul 56,848 22.9%
    Jon Huntsman 41,945 16.9%
    Newt Gingrich 23,411 9.4%
    Rick Santorum 23,362 9.4%
    Rick Perry 1,766 0.7%
    Other 3,621 1.5%

    Report Post » marvel  
    • midwesthippie
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:23am

      GOP OFFICIALS: Other actually recieved 12 more votes…final tally= Other 3,633

      Report Post » midwesthippie  
    • marvel
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:26am

      LOL I take it back, it IS a conspiracy.

      Report Post » marvel  
    • samuelwcordrey
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:50am

      Actually they just announced Santorum was undercounted in New hampshire as well and that he beat Newt.

      Report Post »  
    • JRook
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 2:54pm

      How do we know they count any better in NH. I mean Iowa had to count an average of 43 votes for each of their 1,834 precincts. What a taunting task. Clearly the problem is voter id, as the people counting the votes have it nailed.

      Report Post »  
  • meeknotweak
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:11am

    This article is almost buried in the Blaze!!!! HMMM an agenda maybe? This should be TOP News, but nooo Gingrich and Romney are. I thought the Blaze was a conservative, constitutionalist, upright website, bringing the truth to conservatives. I guess they are no better /worse than the MSM, I guess if the “party” does not want Santorum, and the media does not want Santorum, then it does not matter that he outshines all the others in true conservatism and adhering to the constitution, I guess actually winning in Iowa – the pace setter of the caucuses, the tone setter. Then he is unimportant to them!! That this is now called a virtual tie, what a crock of deception, and lies. This is VERY Important. Very Important. And yet we all lie down and accept this! What a bunch of patsy‘s and *****’s we are. I came to america and became a citizen because of the constitution, because of the founding fathers, becuase of the war of independance, because of the assumed values still upheld by the people. Well I guess I have to move now, as this place is no better than a third world african pauper nation, (o you dont think so, lets talk in 20 years), standing only on the borrowings of lender nations and central banks, that will come and extract their collatoral. The army, airforce cannot run on a propped up fiat currency forever. The people were the last chance to clean house. & IF the people dont clean house and I mean CLEAN HOUSE, then we have no hope, so embrace your future drones.

    Report Post » meeknotweak  
  • piper60
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:10am

    They won’t change anything because of this. There was a story that at least one precinct was mis-counted before the caucus even ended. The powers that be want Romney in, so that’ll do what they have to.

    Report Post » piper60  
    • neverfinal
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:56am

      This proves that the Elites are as always doing their DIRTY Business everywhere.
      They have selected in order: Romney, Newt, Perry then Huntsman. Romney is their main guy!!! This proves it all. I have done my homework and intensely researched them all.
      The Elites do not want Santorum or Paul. Which means they are who we need to vote for.

      We stayed up late to watch the Iowa voting. There was no question to us that things were being lost at that time. The Media is our tell all. They were panicking that Santorum was winning over Romney.
      How obvious was their distortion of the truth, for the end result!!!! They jumped in and declared Romney as the winner, first thing in the morning News with an 8 vote lead. Now Santorum has a certified 34 vote lead and it is declared a tie??To top it off, 8 precincts have gone missing??This is proof to me that the powers to be (The self appointed elites, with UN and NWO alliances) are the cheaters and controllers with no intent for a true vote. Without a voting process that is trust worthy then we know Obama will win. All of this means nothing and we are being led down the gates of HELL. Proof that Newt and Romney are big Government is over whelming, Perry is dropping and Huntsman where back up.
      That only leaves our only chances to Restore this Country are Santorum or Paul. The rest have been presented to us and they don’t intend to loose. They will cheat and commit fraud. Don’t use those machines to vote. Only written form to vote.

      Report Post »  
  • acovenantinblood
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:05am

    Some where in a deep dark star chamber, George Soros is saying “ehh….ehhh…Here is 1 billion dollars. Ehh…ehhh….Go provoke an election crisis.”

    Report Post » acovenantinblood  
    • midwesthippie
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:04am

      STOP THE PRESSES!!! this is great big news to glenn and the blaze…pat and stu. now they can feel like kingmakers…powerful…influential. ricky santorum finished 5th in NH. Perry has dropped out of the race and is supporting Newt. glennpatstu cannot for the life of them figure out why??? it’s driving them insane with rage…hilarious! Gingrich/Paul 2012

      Report Post » midwesthippie  
  • GreatGu
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:02am

    Let me see, Romney over Santorum by 8 votes is a win. Santorum over Romney by 34 votes doesn’t count, and is seen as a tie. And the GOP wonders why we jump ship to the Conservative or Constitution Party.

    Report Post »  
    • Sion
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:55am

      My thoughts exactly!!

      Report Post »  
    • auntbea
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:35am

      Matt Strawn: An 8 point guesstimate lead is a “win.“ A 34 point point lead is a ”tie.” If you don’t like it, you are “spinning.” Mr. Strawn, nobody is spinning, you have a bias. So much for Iowa.

      Report Post »  
    • Joe Schmuck
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:50am

      @GREAT You got it!

      The Libs, dems, GOP, EVERYBODY seems to be scared to death of a True Conservative having a place in the race.

      Report Post » Joe Schmuck  
    • Skippy Toes
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:33am

      Guys- We are honest in Iowa. I’m appalled at Matt Strawn not declaring Santorum the winner when he declared Romney the winner with 8 votes. Yes, it is virtually a tie,but not really. Numbers count when it is this close. If this would have been a football game, you better believe there would be a winner. Those votes would have made the difference in a real election. Corruption and politics go together like hope and change.

      Report Post » Skippy Toes  
  • Choctaw1954
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:00am

    I’m not surprised, I think Rick S. should go to the White House but “they” will make sure he doesn’t! Both sides are as corrupt as they come….it’s not gonna change until the people of this country Draw a line in the sand….instead of having their heads in it!

    Report Post » Choctaw1954  
    • midwesthippie
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:08am

      GOP officials: Santorum finished fifth in New Hampshire after all.

      Report Post » midwesthippie  
  • Maxim Crux
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:57am

    virtual tie? What does that really mean anyway? It means that it is not real. How about giving us the real results and just saying what it is…a win for Santorum.

    Report Post »  
    • Joe Schmuck
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:40am

      @MAX

      Exactly! Why did Romney win when there was an 8 vote difference, but now with a 34 vote difference it’s a TIE???

      Report Post » Joe Schmuck  
    • MacPharlan
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:47am

      The problem is they can‘t find the ’real’ vote, 8 precincts cannot be verified, so this new recount does not matter, you did not count 8 pieces of the whole.

      Why is this a story? They both came out and said they pretty much won.

      Report Post »  
  • Arruba
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:54am

    Florida poll: Romney way ahead. What they didn’t report more than once is, they only polled 535 people. What about the other 200k Republicans? Polls are reported to tell you what to think! Stand up now for who has principals before it’s too late .

    Report Post »  
    • neverfinal
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:06am

      Agreed…..Don’t even listen to the polls. This is how they have controlled everything for so long. The Media is the Biggest problem to lead us to the slaughter. I say that if you are polled, don’t give answers. Refuse or just tell them undecided. Then that throws them all off.

      Report Post »  
  • hauschild
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:52am

    It was a RINO-RINO finish in Iowa.

    We’ve got big government progressives commandeering our party. Save Dodd-Frank and Obamacare and recess appointments, what would really change?

    Report Post »  
  • Arruba
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:49am

    The Republicans are making a huge mistake pushing Romney on everyone. Obama wants Romney because the campaign is already planned to be Marxist class warfare to avoid his record. Santorum is middle class and it won’t work on him. The Obama media will have to attack religion which will turn a lot of Democrats off. People have had enough of that crap. I’m beginning to think the establishment Republicans are just as dumb as Obama supporters and want to lose. Romney will lose an all out Marxist attack, he can’t even handle Newt!

    Report Post »  
  • thegoldman
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:41am

    Eight precincts are missing ?

    How do you loose that many votes ?

    The Dems want Mitt Romney to win are they helping him ?

    I can obama winning now more than ever…

    Report Post » thegoldman  
    • lukerw
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:52am

      Both Democrats and Repulicans… of the PROGRESSIVE ilk… will Cheat and Corrupt any Election… for the END “justifies” the Means!

      Report Post » lukerw  
    • midwesthippie
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:35am

      ???…Santorum does have a seedy italian family background.

      Report Post » midwesthippie  
  • truthb4fiction
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:37am

    #1. It was Romney Wins! When he was ahead, and now all the news outlets are talking Tie! Give me a break! Anyone NOT thinking that they are choosing for us?
    #2 Santorum, I didn’t think he had a chance, liked him (no body’s perfect) but just thought no way… At least over the last 6 months of “like’in him” I haven’t felt embarassed about it. Compared to having said I liked some of the other candidates too early on.
    #3. The best thing Newt ever said… “Why would you vote for the guy, who lost to the guy, who lost to Obama!….. Priceless
    #4 I don’t mind the process.. TELL IT ALL! let’s get the dirt out there right now! Spread this thing out give the nation a chance to vote not just the first few primary states (some of which moved their days up to favor the establishment candidate.

    that is all…

    Report Post »  
    • thegoldman
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:45am

      They got something on Romney.

      when they get him though the primary and close to the election the guillotine will come down on us…

      Romney is poison stay away from him…

      Report Post » thegoldman  
  • ThisIsCrowfeatheR
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:34am

    WHAT ?!?! Election fraud..errr sorry, I mean “discrepancies” that just happen to push the pre-chosen, inevitable candidate of the party machine to a so called “historic victory”? Then mysteriously more election fraud…. oops, there I go again, I mean, more “discrepancies” lead to votes being “lost”?

    I’m shocked !!! shocked I say !!! (eyes rolling) At least they kept that conspiracy nut Ron Paul from winning, jeez what would we do then?

    Report Post »  
    • ThisIsCrowfeatheR
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:48am

      In all seriousness, Rick Santorum was probably robbed of a win. I don’t support Rick at all, I consider him a bible wielding, hypocrite, but this was an obvious sham. Rick Santorum won Iowa, Mitt Romney won NH, if Newt wins SC then the pre determined narrative of a Romney sweep is blown up :)

      Report Post »  
  • flipper1073
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:31am

    An All this time I thought only Democrats liked VOTER FRAUD !
    seem Iowa Republicans do it too.
    WHO KNEW ?

    Report Post » flipper1073  
  • skiz
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:30am

    The truth is folks…we are being fooled at every turn from Washington. The polititians in this country (R & D) are nothing more than power hungry, money grabbers. Until we rise up ( and I mean RISE UP!!!) this will never change. We are lied to daily. They keep 1/2 the country pre-ocupied with chump change welfare checks and the rest off us work our asses off for very little. If we demand it, I mean really DEMAND it (with millions at the capital) we could once again have honest leaders and become a prosperous nation again. When will we wake up?

    Report Post » skiz  
  • cemerius
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:28am

    Santorum is the best candidate but he will unfortunately run out of money and you can’t be the POTUS if you are poor…….isn’t this a great and sad condition? Spend Billions or in Obama’s case TRILLIONS for a job that pays 400k? Anyone can be POTUS but, you gotta be rich first!!!

    Report Post » cemerius  
  • recoveringneocon
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:24am

    This is really irreverent, After Saturday “s’nnelG” little pet ricky will be history. He just can’t win without being on the ballot in Virginia or the District of Columbia. His campaign also filed incomplete slates of delegates in Illinois and Ohio, which could limit his ability to win delegates in those key states and the people know this.

    Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • Stuck_in_CA
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:28am

      And this is what we have ahead of us:
      Who’da thunk: Bias in new vote-counting system?
      A top director at a venture-capital firm that finances a controversial new online voting system donated to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and also contributed the maximum allowable amount to Obama’s inauguration, WND has learned.

      The foreign-headquartered company, SCYTL, previously faced questions about the security of its electronic voting technologies, which are now set to be deployed in 900 U.S. jurisdictions…
      http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-donors-company-funds-controversial-election-firm/

      Report Post » Stuck_in_CA  
  • Tomfang
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:18am

    What is the problem with our voting system??? In the computer age, this should be a no brainer! How do you “lose” votes with such a simple process? I think I could train a monkey to do a better job than some of these poll workers.

    Report Post »  
    • V-MAN MACE
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:25am

      I don’t believe them. I think they stole votes from Ron Paul and distributed them to Santorum and Romney.

      But it’s ok.

      Go ahead and steal an election. Create a constitutional crisis (as if we don’t already have one).

      I can’t wait to encounter the traitors in the collapse.

      Report Post » V-MAN MACE  
    • cemerius
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:26am

      Inconsititencies create chaos and where there is chaos there is profit….the “process” is this way so the door is open for operatives!!! It’s like the old west and poker you were EXPECTED to cheat but you better not get caught!!!!

      Report Post » cemerius  
    • RonmeyPaulBotsrOdd
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:30am

      When I participated in the 2008 Caucus – it was not even voting. Not one person checked to see if I was even registered. It is a waste of time to have the caucus – they need to switch to a primary vote and be done with it. Voting by raised hands and shuffling people around in groups is senseless enough and that influence bleeds over to the counting.
      I am more concerned with the buses that were brought in from Chicago to beat Hillary and how easily manipulated it is versus plain outright voting.

      Report Post »  
    • southernORcobra
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:35am

      it’s called cheating

      Report Post »  
    • Snidely
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:15pm

      RONMEYPAULBOTSRODD You are talking about the democrat caucus, not the republican caucus. At the republican caucus, there are actual ballots and you would have had to show your ID to get a ballot. Obviously there is room for improvement in the process. I have no doubt that the counting of the votes at the precinct was accurate and honest. A representative from each candidate can watch the ballot counting. The problem is the process used to report it to the state GOP office. Phoning the count in and relying on someone not to make an error entering it on the other side make it too easy for someone to make a typo or other error.

      Report Post » Snidely  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:11am

    Don‘t tell me the Republican elite aren’t in the bag for Romney. They successfully robbed Santorum of a lot of momentum despite having won in Iowa.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
  • aaott
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:11am

    I love RIck more and more whenever I hear him speak.

    Report Post »  
    • fatjack
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:54pm

      Well I wouldn’t go that far, but I intend on voting for him.

      Report Post » fatjack  
  • Cat
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:09am

    Here we go … Again
    Politics as usual … No change

    Report Post » Cat  
  • Stuck_in_CA
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:07am

    The Romney machine couldn’t quite finagle this one!

    My post from yesterday:
    Stuck_in_CA
    Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:47am

    Who REALLY won Iowa?
    …Now we are being told that the Iowa results “don’t matter.” They matter, regardless of any rent-an-expert who shows up in the press. Misreported results manipulated the candidate field from which the rest of America can choose.
    The Des Moines Register is now reporting an even greater malfeasance: that the final, certified Iowa result may “never be known.” There were several typos, they say. Some precincts will never be reported, they claim.
    That we got a heads up at all about bogus media results was due to an alert Iowa citizen, Edward True, who captured evidence of the 20-vote misreport in his Appanoose County precinct. That people like Edward True were stationed all over Iowa capturing results before they hit the state Republican Committee tabulation was due to Black Box Voting, where the need to do this was explained, and to radio hosts and sites like Bradblog and Facebook, where the word went out.
    Mainstream media then began its next act of theatre: They started spinning the false result that THEY THEMSELVES announced as — instead of their own foolishness — “making Iowa look foolish”…
    http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

    Report Post » Stuck_in_CA  
    • circleDwagons
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:23am

      we where told that Iowa did not matter before the caucus because Paul was polling so well. IA does not matter VA does not matter according to the elites We The People don’t matter. they know better, if only we listen to them Besides do you think it’s your money?

      Report Post » circleDwagons  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:26am

      Romney did “finagle this one” just fine. Look at the momentum he stole from Santorum.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
  • singleparent
    Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:05am

    Who cares ……They are all liars and unconstitutional….

    Report Post »  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love