Greta Queries Cain: ‘Gotta Roamin’ Eye at All?’
- Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:29pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
In a much-anticipated interview with Fox News’ Greta van Sustren Monday evening, GOP front-runner Herman Cain denied allegations of sexual harassment that were leveled against him by two former National Restaurant Association employees back in the 1990′s. Cain acknowledged knowing about one of the allegations made at the time by a woman whose name he did not recall, but said he was unaware that a second woman had ever made a harassment claim against him.
(Related: Cain denies sexual harassment claims)
Cain described his recollection of what lead to one of the allegations:
“I can’t even remember her name, but I do remember the formal allegation she made in terms of sexual harassment,” Cain said of one of his accusers who he recalled was a writer in the association’s communications department. “She was in my office one day, and I made a gesture saying, and I was standing close to her, and I made a gesture saying, ‘You are the same height as my wife.’ And I brought my hand up to my chin saying my wife comes up to my chin.”
Cain asserted that the exchange took place in an office where the door was wide open, and in view of his secretary.
Cain acknowledged that one of the two women received some sort of settlement, equal to two-to-three months’ salary, and that the amount was roughly the same as a typical employee severance package would have been at the time. Cain recalled that several members of the restaurant association’s board of directors vouched for his character, and that, after an investigation by the organization’s general counsel was completed, the accuser’s allegations were “found to be baseless.”
During the “On the Record” interview, which rang much like a cross-examination, van Sustren asked Cain if he has a “roamin’ eye at all” when it comes to women. Cain replied that while he “enjoys flowers” like anyone else, he does “not at all” have a roaming eye.
Cain believes the allegations now surfacing are an attempt to discredit him because he is surging in the polls and because he is “likeable.” He asserted that his rivals cannot attack his plans, so instead are attempting to attack his character.
When asked why he waited until now to acknowledge that he knew about a settlement with one of the women, Cain said that he wanted to be clear on the details of the claims being made against him before addressing them directly. He also said that since Politico broke the story, three former board members of the restaurant association have spoken out in his defense and “confirmed my integrity.”
“I am glad I waited,” concluded Cain.
Watch a portion of Cain’s interview below. The “roamin’ eye” comment comes at around the 2:12 mark:
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 692 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 496 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 346 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 331 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 315 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 331 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 239 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 315 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (435)
whatthehellbook
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:18amMake way for Ron Paul in 2012, even if he has to run as a third party candidate…
http://www.whatthehellbook.com/the-book/
libertytreecaretaker
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:29amCoocoo!
Report Post »FoxNewsLies23
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:41amok he’s crazy because he believes in Freedom. Really whos crazier?
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:48ami’m coocoo for Liberty and Freedom. Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:49amIf Ron Paul runs as third party and keeps Obama in the White House .. his name will go down in history right next to Benedict Arnold!
goobert
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:59amId rather have Ron Paul over any republican. This guy is introducing a value added tax (aka national sales tax) and not introducing a single spending cut.
Report Post »Yuri_Bezmenov
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:59amPAUL is a nut job. USA needs to have a foot on the throat of certain countries around the world or there will be world wide meyhem. Fiscaly smart guy. International issues the mans not all there.
Report Post »PCDoctors4u2
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:07amBennedict Arnold and Ross Peirrot …
They would make a mighty fine team
Cain&Paul or Paul&Cain it really does not matter who takes the lead, flip a Coin,
Because as Obamawho has let the world know…“The Job is too Big for just one Man”
Will letting go of all of the CZARS and their staff creat a flux in the unemployment numbers?
Report Post »Let’s hope so!
A Conservatarian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:18amThe united states is not the police of the world. The united nations is, lmfao, let the world have the U.N. while we look to our own. This does not mean Paul would turn his back on allies, there are many instances of him saying he’d support and defend allies needing assistance. The all too used nation is Israel. Israel has in the past pounded on all it’s neighbors simultaneously, they will again. I’m not a war advocate here, but, they have been fighting for thousands of years, they ain‘t stoppin’ any time soon. Israelis in large part don’t want our money, they do not need financial support. They are the only republic and democracy in the middle east, they will never be abandoned yet do not mistake them for a week country. Without the united states telling them they can’t fight their neighbors, mmmmmmmm, they will finally beat down some of those nations that you say need our boot on their throat. China? If we get rid of federal reserve notes……well let‘s just s ay I’d love it if china was left with a trillion + of worthless paper while only new real currency, not fiat, is issued to the citizens. Oh. Happy. Day.
Report Post »Alfred F. Jones
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:23amIf Ron Paul runs as a third candidate, then Obama will win because Ron Paul will split the vote within the republican party. If you are okay with that, then you might as well vote for Obama and shove our country in sewage ditch.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:36amNice try Alfred, but at least you’re covered now, if your guy loses it‘s Paul’s fault, if Obama makes more commie machinery if he wins, it’s Pauls fault. Last time around I voted for my grandmother and will again if I have too because a vote is precious. It’s the most precious thing we have in this republic as it signifies our freedom and those who fought for it. I will not use that precious right of ours to pick a lesser of two evils, neither should you.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:39amYou folks comparing Benedict Arnold to Ross Perot and Ron Paul are pathetic. Although Perot has a different set of values than Paul (pro choice, anti gun, anti drug) Perot and Paul stood up for what they believed in, and ran based on their own set of principles. They tried to break the two party system, but it has been taken over by the two parties, and new laws have made it nearly impossible to win as third party. If they pull votes away from the lesser evil, good; that means that people voted on principle instead of voting for the status-quo or my personal favorite, “the one who can win”… Terrible, terrible terrible, after 4 years of Obama you would think you’d want to get the RIGHT guy in this time, instead of another Obama-light…
Vote on principle and what you believe in, not who’s going to win, not who’s going to make you look less racist, not who said the right things at the right time, but the person who has a consistent record of standing up for your rights, and fighting for your liberties. For me, it’s Ron Paul. 30 years of voting against everything unconstitutional: bailouts, tax increases, gun control, tax payer funded abortion, debt ceiling increases and a hatred for the fiat federal reserve system mean an awful lot to me. He is a veteran as well.
Our founders knew that a two party system was asking for corruption, but they hoped that there would be enough small parties to keep each other in check. Unfortunately that did not happen.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 3:53am@A CONSERVATARIAN
Report Post »I will not use that precious right of ours to pick a lesser of two evils, neither should you.
——————
What you SHOULD do, though, is write your candidate and tell him to stop using the EVIL Republican machine for political gain.
A Conservatarian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:24amKryptonite, last election was a choice between crap and worse crap. Ditto since Reagan. The party isn’t evil cuz of that, though I get your assumption.
Report Post »Diggyme
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:40amWell you Ron Paul people really are just retreads of the Ross Perot days and like in the Ross Perot days their man didn’t win did he….no instead we had four more years of Lewinski , and Broaderick, and that big good ole boy with the rummy nose….who brought us this housing crises and this depression and set the stage for the riots in our streets and finally the BO man…..so just get your guy to run independent and watch your country go down the drain…now I know you don’t really care about your country because you are so _____ed stuck on your little hobby horse….well that little hobby will destroy you….and frankly if it didn’t hurt so bad to see the country of Madison, and Washington and Franklin falling so low….I would say it serves you and those like you right.
Report Post »platitude
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:59amcriticize obama and the left calls you racist. Now, criticize cain and the right calls you a racist? I think I am going to undergo pigment alteration surgery so I can become a protected class.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:02amHow could anyone vote for a thug who threatens to run as a third party candidate and throw the election to Obama if we don’t choose him. What a conceited brat! Why would we want another one of those? To those who don’t agree with EVERYTHING they say, Paul and supporters answer “you just don’t understand….” Sound familiar?
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:14amHaha, Ron Paul is the one who will return us to small government, cut spending drastically, return us to real capitalism not the state run socialist economy we have today, restore the powers of the Constitution, restore States rights and powers and focus on our huge internal problems and imbalances and people call him coocoo? I guess it is coocoo to those who love their Socialist big government welfare utopia America has become.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:32am“…the one (Paul) who will return us to small government, cut spending drastically, return us to real capitalism not the state run socialist economy we have today, restore the powers of the Constitution, restore States rights and powers and focus on our huge internal problems and imbalances….”
–KICKILLEGALSOUT
Let’s see– smaller government, cut spending, get back to capitalism, the Constitution, and strong states, correct internel problems and imbalances….
Report Post »Gee… them those sure are some gud original ideas Mr. Paul has there. Sure am glad I stopped to take a gud look at yer post here….
Obama Been Lauding
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:41amUnless Ron Paul makes a significant move, he will not get the Republican nomination.
Report Post »With that said, I would ask that he put all his knowledge and resources behind whoever gets the nomination, and not run as a third party candidate. If he does, he will likely hand the office of president to Obama again. He must think this over, but for the good of the country, and our kids, we must remove this scourge from the White House!!!!
Please, no third party in 2012!!!! Or we are doomed!!!!
Rob
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:45amPaul is the little Keebler Elf no one but nuts take seriously. He WANTS Iran to have nukes….nuff said.
Report Post »Raider1
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:12amRon Paul will not win the nomination. As third party he will ensure Obamas victory. I like Ron but ….I’m voting for the republican even if it was you…just to keep the marxist dictator from another term in office.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:43amIt was probably Ron Paul supporters who brought this to light. It means nothing. Everyone, including the establishment Republicans are afraid of an intelligent, conservative, successful black man. I’m a white female, and I’ll be voting for Cain. And I‘m not doing it to prove I’m not a racist like everyone did last election cycle. Remember, Obama is only half white. They did that on purpose. If he succeeded, they could use the excuse that Republicans only accepted him because he’s half white, thus are racists. Now that he’s NOT succeeded (or let’s use the real word: FAILED) in his policies, they can use the excuse that he was held back because he’s black, thus Republicans are still racist. It deflects from the fact that Democrats are the racist ones. Establishment Republicans are afraid a true conservative will rock the establishment boat too much.
Report Post »Obama_Sham
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:43am“value added tax (aka national sales tax)”
A VAT and national sales tax are not the same thing… Not even close to being the same thing… Stop making yourself look like a fool… Maybe take Macro and/or microeconomics?!? Either will thoroughly explain the difference between a VAT and a sales tax!!!
Report Post »Obama_Sham
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:47amAnyone but Barry in 2012… Even though he is only slightly better, I would vote for Romney over Barry… Keep in mind, better is better even though only by a slight amount…
Either way, if the primary was tomorrow, I would be torn between Cain and Paul… Both have their fatal flaws and both have their strong points…
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:34amCAT, that is absolutely the truth! The last thing we need is one of these GOP candidates muddying the waters in this election. Hopefully they love what is left of this country and are smarter than that.
Report Post »TEA4Me
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:38amListen Ron Paul fans. I actually wish I could vote for Ron Paul. I think that he is EXACTLY who we need when it comes to domestic policy for the most part. But his foreign defense policy is just DANGEROUS and it could bring down this country faster than anything. He is an isolationist who is just WRONG on foreign defense policy. Period. I am not saying we shouldn’t be moving troops out of the middle east, but we also need to keep our finger on the trigger, ready to go back in a moments notice if need be. For example, if Iran moves much closer to Nuclear weapons, we are going to have to go in there and kick their butts. Sorry, we just cannot let what amounts to a terroist organization arm themselves with nuclear weapons. Imagine if the planes of 9/11 were actually nuclear bombs. Guess what? NYC and DC would be EXTINCT!!! Think about that.
I even agree with him on some of his other foreign policy. I don’t think we should be sending foreign aid to most of the governments we now support, especially when we have a financial crisis at home, but his military foreign policy is an ABSOLUTE DEAL BREAKER. Period.
And buy the way, if he runs as a third party, which he will not for the exact reason that follows, HE WILL GUARANTEE OBAMA’S RE-ELECTION. Same goes for Donal Trump… We cannot have a fracture of any kind in the ABO voting block because the liberial zombies are going to vote for the guy even if he told them point blank he ultimate goal was to enslave th
Report Post »TEA4Me
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:44amO_Sham,
Let‘s don’t get carried away. Romney isn’t a staunch conservative, but he isn’t just “slightly” better than Obama. He is VASTLY better than Obama. And again, I will vote for WHOEVER is the Republican Nominee, even if it is Ron Paul. And that should be EVERYONE’s attitude (including the Ron Paul fans). We must defeat Obummer at any cost if we are to save the Union. Sadly that is not hyperbole, that is truth.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:49amI like Greta … watch her show all the time but I thought Greta’s questioning was very accusatory.
Report Post »Not usually her style.
endgamer
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:49amRon Paul – Peter Schiff 2012 BTW my dad admittedly had a “roamin Eye” too.. He got more A$$ than a toilet seat. That’s why a parents were divorced. The ramifications. Nothing wrong with appreciating beauty, acting upon it is another.
Report Post »MrObvious
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:05amRon Paul fails to see the Iranian threat for what it is.
Report Post »He thinks it’s ok if they get nukes.
The leaders of that country are 12ers (a doomsday cult).
I will never vote for a somebody who’s willing to give nukes to a doomsday cultist.
That alone completely disqualifies Ron Paul for Prez.
It does not matter how good he is on defending freedom, if there is nobody left to protect.
endgamer
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:16amMr Obvious.. It’s obvious that Israel has a far superior military than anyone in the middle east and does not need our military assistance. It is obvious that Israel can afford to stand on it’s own merit without our “strings attached” Foreign AID! Third and most obvious: Israel has over 300 nuclear weapons and can make Iranian Fritters any day of the week.
Report Post »Ron Paul will END our restrictions on Israel so they can take action as they choose. It‘s the current US involvement in their affairs that’s the problem.. BOOM!!! Anybody like a fritter?
Gonzo
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:17amThen make way for another 4 years of Obama.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:21amThat idiot believes the government was behind 9-11. Yeah we need an idiot like Ron Paul.
Report Post »Watchingtheweasels
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:21amRon Paul wants to shut down 5 federal departments, including that hive of Stalinist indoctrination the department of education. How many departments is your favorite republican candidate willing to clo down?
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:43amI believe the progressives that have infiltrated our government were behind the 9/11 attacks. Ever hear of a false flag attack? There have been many in our history. Lets have the list: http://911review.com/articles/anon/false_flag_perations.html
Report Post »John 3:16
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:51amOkay can Ron, the kook, Paul just go away please. Ronnie will only help OBAMA not conservatives. He is a kook with some good ideas but you can’t take the Kook out of him.
Report Post »robinakilt
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:07amA third party Ron Paul means a second term of Barrack Hussien Obama. Everyone against Hussein need to come together behind the Republican candidate no matter who that will be, going third party just looks like he is throwing a fit. Hussien must go!
Report Post »randerson503
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:09amYou must be CooCoo to support Ron Paul as president. He has no leadership ability and the personality of a cement block. As President you are Commander in Chief, as well as, Chief Ambassador for the nation. I know his supporters are for freedom (mostly freedom to smoke weed) but there is more to the office of the President than ideas.
Report Post »Curtman41
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:15amRon Paul running as a third party candidate and misguided, uninformed voters like whatthehellbook who will vote for him will GUARANTEE Obama’s reelection. As a third party candidate, Paul would more than likely draw enough votes away from the Republican nominee. If Paul doesn’t get the Repub nomination (which he won’t), he needs to go away.
Report Post »jihadazzkicker
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:20amFor all of you Paul zombies…one of my pet peeves is TERM LIMITS. Your hero has made a career out of his gobment job, 30 years & counting ….. yea we needed Paul for 30 years. If he runs as a third party guy, as he has stated, that tells you that he does NOT put this county first. He alone will put odumbo back in the WH. He is an ego maniac, proof …. he states he will run as a third party guy, he has been on the gobment payroll for 30 F-ing years…..wake up out there.
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:31amI feel sorry for him on this one. Sexual harassement laws being what they are-if a woman FEELS harassed she is-doesn’t matter the intent of the “perpertrator”.There is no objective criteria in sexual harassment law. if telling someone you’re the same height as my wife-FEELS bad to the woman-it IS legally harrassment.hence If he said those words he was guilty[because she FELT harassed]. So he had to settle.He should have taken a pre-emptive strike and disclosed this up front when he announced he was running. -That he thought a legal settlement would go undisclosed -shows poor judgement.
Report Post »We’ve become a nation of feminized men.Those muslims are anti -woman -we claim[they might claim they're protectors of women] but we have become anti-men. The only place men can show “strength” is in the military and war. Hence we glorifiy the military and war mongers.We spew all our agression on dehumanized targets['terrorists" ,muslims ], where we get a pass-everywhere else -men have become wimps [lacking in integrity,honest and authenticity].Men willingly stay in line to not reap the wrath of feminist women whose anti-male ethos dominates the culture..There is government promotion of an anti-male agenda when because someone says she was harassed she was harassed..Men are spineless in the face of such skewed anti-male legislation.
rifradio
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:54amEnough with the Ron Paul crap. He’s not even a conyender. He’s barely in the double digits. What? Is there 12 of you who have nothing to do but sit and flood every blog that you can find all day long? He‘s got a few good ideas but he’s far from presidential!
Report Post »James83940
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:55amA vote for Ron Paul will always be a vote for the Democratic nominee. ALWAYS.
Report Post »beckisnuts.
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:00amBeck is trying to get Herman Cain to appear on his radio show, but does Cain realize that Beck’s website The Blaze has allowed a participant named “BIGLIPNAGGER” on here since June 3rd? He may have, since I emailed his campaign the info and the links a while back. In any event, The Blaze has never taken any action on this racist forum member.
Report Post »Bubbakittysmom
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:05amIf Ron Paul runs as a third party candidate, we will have Barack Obama for four more years. Does anyone really want that?
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:26amMore Paulistas Posting on a thread about Herman Cain and threatening a third party run. Rules apparently mean nothing to these imbeciles.
Ron Paul said on Sunday he would not launch a third party run, but on last Thursday night he said he would consider it. Flip flop? Lie?
Ron Paul is a Libertarian who is trying to hijack the GOP, despicable. Run in your own damn party Doctor Paul, like that traitor Bob Barr did in 2008.
You idiotic paulbots will give us a second BO term and cut of your nose to spite your face, dooshebags!
Every RP supporter I have ever met is also a 911 truther among other dubious associations. Flippin morons, truly deranged individuals all of them.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:29amCatB
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:49am
If Ron Paul runs as third party and keeps Obama in the White House .. his name will go down in history right next to Benedict Arnold!
===========================================
Sounds like you‘d be better off getting behind Ron Paul then if you don’t want that to happen!
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:33amOokspay
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:26am
Ron Paul is a Libertarian who is trying to hijack the GOP,
======================================================
Ron Paul is a conservative who is trying to move the GOP back to its conservative roots and away from the liberal, Marxist direction that it began following roughly 25 years or so ago.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:57amRon Paul is preferable to another statist running against the socialist in chief.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 11:02amLIBERTYFADING – Do you notice that most of the rhetoric in opposition to Ron Paul is similar to the socialists we have in office now? It’s time to expose the socialist element within the Republican Party as it is obvious within the Democrats.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 11:24amPaul tried that before as a libertarian……FAIL. Even being a registered libertarian, I would not vote for Ron Paul as President…his foreign policy is too naive….and I sure and heck wouldn’t let the Iranians develope a nuclear weapon (if they don’t have one already!).
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:11pmI love how all of you Ron Paul supporters suggest the executive branch has that much power that he could actually implement his plans. Sorry folks, but it takes time for change that radical to happen, not with out a revolution. At which time, if one does come to be, I will be side by side with you and Ron Paul can lead the way, but until then, I will try my hand pulling the lever for a candidate to first get Obama out, then move a bit more to the right on the next round.
Report Post »Lastly, you Pauli-ans tell me this. If Paul was to get elected, what would you do with all these radical Lefty’s beant on Socialism, who will have a coronary as Paul tries to eliminate all the social programs in place ?? He will need to bring the entire military home as he suggests, just so he can fight the millions of people who rise up in anger against him from the left. What will he do, put them all in jail ?? Wipe them out with military ?? How do you think the rest of the US will respond to that considering these are there brothers, sisters, mothers and father’s ??
Look, I agree with you guys and the policies Paul would love to implement, if he ever really could considering we are republic. However, that is just as crazy as the looney lefties who think world peace and the end of starvation being possible. Interesting how both of you two have so many things in common. Gob Bless you though for your spirit.
Charles Curtis
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:22pmOFF TOPIC – So tell us why you HIJACK the tread just to run an AD for RON?
Report Post »tankyjo
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:39pmDefinitely the end of the world in 2012, if so. Waiting to see a bump for Cain, Paul/Fudd, 2012 won’t cut it.
Report Post »hebronhick
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:40pmThe only thing that Ron Paul will accomplish by running as a third party candidate is to insure the election of President Obama. Paul does not have support among centrists and swing voters to win even a three way split election. Every vote that Paul would get would be taken directly from the side of the Republican. No true Dem would ever vote for Paul (as would no true Republican vote for Obama…now) so a vote for Paul is a vote for Obama. Perhaps, if we could revamp the process and do away with the Electoral College, a third party scenario may be possible in later years. But, until that time a third party candidate can hope to be no more than a spoiler.
Report Post »Obama_Sham
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:57pmendgamer
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:16am
Mr Obvious.. It’s obvious that Israel has a far superior military than anyone in the middle east and does not need our military assistance. It is obvious that Israel can afford to stand on it’s own merit without our “strings attached” Foreign AID! Third and most obvious: Israel has over 300 nuclear weapons and can make Iranian Fritters any day of the week.
Ron Paul will END our restrictions on Israel so they can take action as they choose. It‘s the current US involvement in their affairs that’s the problem.. BOOM!!! Anybody like a fritter?”
Isn’t that presented in a nice, neat little bow… But what about the oil supply?!? If the middle east completely goes up, as what you are stating, then this country comes to its knees almost immediately… Like it or not, this country is pretty dependent upon oil from the middle east… Without it / major disruption to it, you think things are bad now, they will be beyond your wildest dreams if the oil stops coming…
BTW, I understand we have the natural resources here in the U.S. for our oil consumption and am an advocate of getting off of foreign supply and on to our own supply… However, it will take a little while in order to get to those natural resources and get them on the market (rough estimate, 2 years in order to get our own oil supply to that of foreign oil supply)… In the mean time, this country would completely collapse… Take the leash off of Israel,
Report Post »kcares
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:58pmIf Ron Paul runs as a 3rd party, that will assure BHO will be back to totally destroy the USA.
Report Post »Obama_Sham
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:58pm“Let‘s don’t get carried away. Romney isn’t a staunch conservative, but he isn’t just “slightly” better than Obama. He is VASTLY better than Obama.”
Splitting hairs here… What you call VASTLY, I call slightly…
Report Post »SweetOlBob
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:26pmFor KRYIN’ OUT LOUD ! Give it a rest ! You’ve GOT to know that Mr. Paul runs last or next to last in every poll or primary except for the one where he “salted” the mine by busing in a load of supporters. The gret bulk of Americans do NOT want him for president.
If he truly was a loyal American, thinking of more than his twisted theories and platform, he would support one of the leaders who has a chance of unseating our SLL* in the white house. He’s GOT to know that his running as a third party candidate will only take the members of his cult away from a possible winner and do nothing but strengthen the democRATS. Like I said, —- GIVE IT A REST !
Report Post »* Slimey Little Liar
garyM
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:38pmThis Ron Paul and the third party crap could be the same as forget the election just give Obama 4 more years!
Report Post »GONESURFING
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:40pmI like Herman. Forget Ron Paul, a man with some good ideas and some really kooky views also. Sorry, Ron Paul supporters, but it isn’t going to happen so get real.
Report Post »Samahon
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:07pmI’m sorry, WHATTHEHELLBOOK, but if Ron Paul is not the republican nominee and runs as a 3rd party candidate, get ready for 4 more years of destruction of this great country. I like Ron Paul as much as the rest of you, but he has to be the republican nominee for Obama to be defeated. A 3rd party candidate will split the republican party and the radical liberal progressive democrats will win another 4 yrs to destruct this republic, and if that happens, the only way to fix it is for God to come down and personally clean up this mess, but I am OK with that too.
Report Post »Kenai
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:09pmHey, Ron Paul voters…before you go voting for this man, please consider what this will do. You may as well cast your votes for Obama. PLEASE DON’T MAKE THIS MISTAKE, THESE TIMES ARE NOT THE RIGHT TIMES TO GO SPLITTING THE VOTES IN 2012.
Report Post »AirMotor
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:38pmPaul as an independant will make sure Obama has a second term!!!
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 3:47pmTheBlaze needs to implement comment voting. I’m sick of the Paulbots getting away with looking like they fit right in with the rest of us sane people.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 3:55pmRepublicans mocking, insulting and ridiculing Ron Paul and his supporters such as CatB, OoksPay, PatriotDave, Republicorp, QP Willie, Kryptonite, Tea Party Grammy, and many more on every post and every chance you get understand you are alienating and driving away 15-20% of the Republican base. If we Ron Paul supporters are not valued by you and the Party that much we will gladly take our 15-20% of the base and walk. We will encourage Ron Paul to run 3rd party and to begin the forming of a 3rd party just as the Republican party was formed due to it‘s established not listening to it’s base.
If you think Ron Paul cannot win under a 3rd party you aren’t doing the math. 15-20% is for Ron Paul right now. Ron Paul can steal 10% from BO and independents. Ron Paul can steal 10-15% from the Progressive Republican nominated. Ron Paul could win.
So, if you want to continue to ridicule, alienate, mock, and insult 15-20% of the Republican base at least understand and have the honor to know it will be your responsibility this 15-20% walked away from your bullying. We will not vote progressive any longer and we do have a voice to be heard. You do not want to hear it or appreciate it, ok. You do not deserve our 15-20% of votes then either. Your choice.
Have a great day!
Report Post »ressex
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:35pmRon Paul said he won’t run as a third party last I heard… watched him say it in an interview… but what’s that got to do with Cain…??? and BTW, 9-9-9 is unconstitutional in the way Cain presented it unless they make it an ammendment. I personally don’t want another tax that they could turn into 15-15-15 or 20-20-20… you know they would. And one more thing… stop typing at the idiot ******** on here that claim Ron Paul won’t protect the country and “wants to give nukes to Iran”. Anyone with half a brain knows that spun slander from the ********… You want open boarders and no security, you‘ll get it from all the big gov’t types running against Ron Paul on both sides of the aisle…
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:36pm@Okie, “If you think Ron Paul cannot win under a 3rd party you aren’t doing the math. 15-20% is for Ron Paul right now. Ron Paul can”
________________________________________________________________________________
Uh Okie, you and Colt and a few other RP fanantics’ have already stated that you will write his name in no matter what. So why are you saying that we are “alienating” you guys? The false indignation is quite childish really.
BTW, RP’s latest flip flop is that he will and then will not mount a third party bid. You’d better open your email more frequently, Doctor Paul has updates for you that you need to read and distribute…
I thought that consistency and clarity was the very thing that you and the other Paulunatics were so proud of, hmmm, curiouser and curiouser…
“Wha wha wha, I was going to vote against Obama but Ookspay made me write in Ron Paul’s name Wha wha wha”. Grow a pair!
Report Post »Atlanticgrl
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:49pmAre you crazy? If ANYONE runs 3rd party we’re screwed. We CANNOT afford to have the conservative vote split.
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:59pmYou’re being lied to.. Ron Paul is the Frontrunner.. The establishment press will tell you otherwise.. Believe what you may http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RvN07_cfg0&feature=share
Report Post »bmwrider
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:04pmRecently discovered video of Cain as head of the National restaurant association:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGQ-ISsDm8M
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:53pm@OoksPay
I do have a pair and that pair tells me to stand on Principle and Values. No more progressives. You can spout all the anti-Paul you desire instead of for your candidate. That makes you exactly what you spout out against. Realize that. Vote how you wish just be responsible for your actions. Take care.
@AtlanticGirl
The only ones to lose are Progressives. Do the math, we have. Vote how you wish, we are voting Ron Paul. Take care.
Report Post »tbb
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:16pmIf Ron Paul runs as a third candidate Obama will win. If that is what you ronbots want so be it.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:33pmNorth Carolina for Herman Cain… http://ning.it/uOUweX
1. Herman Cain is NOT a politician. (I have gotten a lot of grief for this comment, but I feel as if I’m on solid ground here because politicians have have gotten this country into the mess we are in, and it’s about time for us to hire a “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” type of candidate. You know, a regular common sense citizen that still owns his own soul and NOT beholden to anyone)
2. Herman Cain is probably the ONLY candidate that can beat Obama. (Two major factors play into my reason for making such a bold statement. One… do NOT believe for a second that beating Obama is going to be easy, and I don’t care who tells you so, they are either dead-wrong or lying to you. Just the expected historical level of cheating that is expected by the Obama Election Thug Machine may be enough for Obama to beat any candidate we put forth. Secondly and more importantly… Herman is the ONLY candidate that can strip away 30% or more of the minority vote from Obama)
There are some very good reasons other than just these two, but for me, these two are all I need.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:35pmRon Paul will be THE REASON that Obama wins another 4 years.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:38pmA Conservatarian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:36am
============================
Alfred P. Jones is 100% On-Target!
Report Post »malcolmtesla
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 10:29amWe all know Herman Cain isn’t the first, and won’t be the last US politician to commit gross sexual misconduct. Not breaking news, I know.. I found a full list of ALL the culprits, from Thomas Jefferson to Schwarzenneger: http://bit.ly/uwJULT Enjoy
Report Post »theunbubba
Posted on November 2, 2011 at 11:09amI see the Paulista nuts are here again. Take the blinders off. If somebody is coming to kill you, you don’t try to talk to them. You kill them first. Otherwise you become another Daniel Pearl. Islam is coming for you. Fight or die. You have no other choice.
Report Post »Whirling Dervish
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:11am“I did not have sexual relations with those women”…Hmmmmmm….. Where did I gear that before???
Report Post »StrongWesternbabeluvinherWesternMAN
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:25amok let us set the record straight. Greta Van Sustren is doing what the powers that be @ Fox tell her to do: WE ARE ELITIST REBUBLICANS AND WE CAN“T HAVE THIS CAIN GUY SPOILING OUR ”SIDING UP WITH THE ELITIST DEMOCRATS (THAT IS WHY WE ALLOWED MCCAIN TO GET THE NOMINATION AGAINST OBAMA)!!!!!! Why on God‘s green earth would Beck throw all caution to the winds and get the ’helll’ out of the Fox control. I watched this whole interview and Greta no longer can cover up her emotions on these interviews. Many of us with common sense have been saying for awhile that Greta HAS AN AGENDA and that agenda is not for the patriotic, Constitution loving American. Nevada had a senatorial race in 2010, Greta already knew the fix was in for Reid (albeit illegal voting) and very confidently called Reid the victor weeks before the election. Many of us said that this ‘Greta’ is not for the ‘folks’ and neither is this Fox broadcasting group!
Report Post »I am done with them…..will continue to watch, record, and send them my remarks…..but like the Beck team: I no longer will be intimidated by their rhetoric!
TH30PH1LUS
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:11amThis is a Republican – that makes the mere accusation of impropriety equal to or greater than a sperm-stained dress, a love-child, or pictures/video of the act. We’ve grown accustomed to the double-standard.
Report Post »Obama_Sham
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:49amI’d rather have a male president that has been accused of having sexual relations with a woman than a male president accused of having sexual relations with a male (Barry and Larry anyone?!?)…
Report Post »Supercalafragalisticexpialidotious
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:15pmI watched a larger portion of this interview on Fox.com. Mr. Cain handled a very tough interview extremely well- and with incredible honesty.
Report Post »Warm In The Desert
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:05amThe legal threshold established by “Feministas” years ago, set the bar quite low to claim sexual harassment. The alleged claim can range from perceived to actual harassment, nonetheless the cost to defend may be larger, than the “go away” cost. So hence a “settlement” out of court, and typically includes a non disclosure clause by all parties.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:51amExactly .. if over all the years he was in postitions of power he only had two of these alleged encounters with fraud .. then he was doing a very good job.
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:35amsounds like gold digging to me.
Report Post »fancydancy
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:40amSexual harassment cuts two ways…men are often sexually harassed by other men or by women, too. Also, women sexually harass women. I know of a case personally of the latter. However, only in the Bible where a man lusting (as Jesus said) is as guilty of committing adultery. No person is perfect and if Cain said he didn’t do anything, I believe him. Like Palin, they are trying to get him off the circuit. This may be reason for him to beat the odds as “their” agenda is being more and more exposed. He calls it like it is and they can’t stand truth.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:57amThis is the fifth article on Cain in the past 48 hrs. Hmmmm… Looks like the Blaze is pushing Cain towards us. And once again see nothing good that he says except for the vouchers.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:13amRomney is a Global Warming & HealthCare freak… Perry is an Illegal Alien apologist… Bachman is weak… Newt is too smart for his own good. The Push is on!
Report Post »FoxNewsLies23
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:17amIgnore the real Champ. Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:24amNewt Global Warming freak too. He has a commercial years ago with Nancy P! I agree with you Romney, Perry much worse than what you stated, Bachman isn’t that bad, & Cain pro Fed & I quote … “With Herman Cain’s 666 plan, I mean 999 plan, it would add a 9% National sales tax on new items to my 1% Cherokee County sales tax and my 6% South Carolina sales tax, making my total sales tax 16%! Im going to open a Thrift store and then I might survive him!”
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:15amI agree – ignore Ron Paul
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:53amlukerw
Newt is too smart for his own good.
you got that right. It’s itimidating to some people. My parents (life long democrats, now looking at the Republican field) think he comes off as stand-offish and establishment. He’s just smart. Smart people put other people off a bit. I think he knows where the bodies are buried, but is not establishment. But I don’t think he has a chance of winning, so I’ll stick with Cain.
Report Post »ressex
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:49pmReluctantly, I‘d rather have Newt if I couldn’t have Ron Paul as President. At least he seems to be bold, very smart, and relatively conservative with good morals and values. I do not vote for the lesser of two evils, as that is still voting for evil… I think that is a lie propogated by the two parties to get everyone to vote for them… but IF I did… I’d vote for Newt. Otherwise I vote for the right person and then I can sleep at night knowing I voted for the best thing for this country. Right now it’s still Ron Paul. You may not agree with him on every aspect, but he is the only one that is NOT a shifty politician, and we’d be free from this socialist machine that is in place now (if they didn’t find a way to defeat his moves after he took office).
Report Post »phillipwgirard
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:56amCAIN’S stand up in book!
Report Post »offsir13
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:56amWhat other candidate that runs for president is as honest and doesn’t dance around allegations? I supported Herman and support him more now! He’s my next president! I’ve never been this excited about supporting a candidate. Herman your gonna get a bump in the polls nobody likes cheap shots like this!
Report Post »Crakaveli
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:58amdoesn’t dance around allegations? hahahahahaha
abortion, TARP, FED, right of return…
not dancing going on whatsoever!
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:22amDoesn’t dance around allegations? Just yesterday he denied knowing of any settlements with anyone who accused him. I can’t believe he’s not still lying. He didn’t just work for the National Restaurant Association, he was the President. How could he not know of an allegation against him or how it was settled?
Report Post »phillipwgirard
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:54amMurdoch is a Bilderberger, that may be why Fox is becoming more left, he attended the last meeting and probably got reamed by the left
Report Post »Mike Benton
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:39amWhat the heck is a BILDERBURGER? Is the abominable snow man one too?
Report Post »LetUsReason
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:04pmMike doesn’t know about the Bilderberg group? Tsk tsk tsk….
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:27pmThe only thing Fox cares about is their anti semitic genocidal propaganda campain[against arab-muslims]. Everything else they ‘ll go as left as they feel.They’re mostly made up of“repentant leftist” neocons who wantt to take over the mid east for the benefit of israel as much as the US..They fanned the flames for the wars 10yrs. ago only to now claim they were against the iraqi invasions. They feed you anti muslim red meat to ensure your loyalty for israeli occupation will never falter. Fox could care less about your loyalty on any other conservative positions. Heck they want to steer you to the left -like they and the elites themselves are.
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:51amThe communications writer just happened to be Anita Hill. What a coincidence!!
Report Post »Warm In The Desert
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:35amDear Greta,
Report Post »Do spend less of your time with Geraldo, and we’ll enjoy your program more often, and visit more frequently. Your “Roamin Eye” question strikes of someone seeking headlines, off the back of the larger topic regarding this man’s integrity. This man defended his honor, integrity, and morals with dignity under this furious attack, and as such gained further press, pub, and donations.
kryptonite
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:59amDear Witch (and words that rhyme):
It ain’t none of your business if Herman Cain has a “roaming eye.” Who do you think you are — GOD? Go make your husband unhappy with your disgusting INTERROGATIONS, you shrieky shrew.
Hey, Fox News, you get worser and worser with each passing day.
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:41amI’ve been around a long time, known many men friends, had brothers, and the only men do don’t have a “roving” eye were DEAD. Stupid B!tch. I have lost all respect for Greta on that one.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:11amYes, it was something how she ups the ante. Now it isn‘t enough not to say something that MIGHT offend a woman’s delicate senibilities. Now you can’t even be seen to notice her. If that‘s the standard then I say put the women in burkas and they won’t get any looks. But if they want to be SEEN then they have no right to complain if men look.
Report Post »Bakko Bomma
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:21amTip of the iceburg.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:44amis sticking a cigar in her sexual harassment?
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:45amGo back to the 10TH degree of not being an a hole, we all know who you are, self important educated turd bag.
Report Post »420 Patriot
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:46amThe only thing that bothered me was when he said: “We didn’t know what to defend…” He said there were no others out there, so it seems to me that he should have known what to defend right away. Anyone involved in settling with these ladies, with Cains position at the time, would have told him what was happening, so I believe he knew. At this point, it does not matter if the accusations are not that credible, it matters that he is acting like he is covering up. I, myself am tired of candidates and Presidents that attempt to cover up anything. I am for someone that is truthful. This is just my opinion.
Report Post »rotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:49am@420
He said that because he wasn’t sure if the article was going to lie about the allegrations. Think if he came out and said it was only a sexual harassment suit and they claimed he raped her or some other nonsense. The whole Clarence Thomas High-Tech Lynching has proven that you can’t trust these people to not just make things up.
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:56amFrom self proclaimed Ohio
Report Post »420 Patriot
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:02am@Rot
I understand your position. My very first post on this when it first broke was to wait and be informed. The best information comes from the person themselves. Unfortunately, Mr. Cain is hard pressed to use his 5th amendment rights because he is running for the most important office in the land. If I was in his position, and I knew what had happened in the past, and it was a frivolous accusation, I would have come out immediately to the public and addressed this before it came out in the press. I raised my children to tell me anything that might happen before I heard it from anyone else and they would not be in as much trouble. They have always done so. I am listening to everything he say’s to determine myself what I believe. We the people are the jury in this situation. Most attorney’s in a court of law would tell their client to not say anything, but as I said previously, he does not have that luxury in his situation.
Report Post »420 Patriot
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:06am@Rot
I read your other posts abd have come to the conclusion that you are a Romney/Cain Bot. You seem so angry.
Report Post »420 Patriot
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:10am@Rot
And according to one of your posts, you do not know what a NEOCON is. Jewish conservative, really? It is a Conservative that uses sanctions or military action to try and spread Democracy around, in a nutshell.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:29am@420 PATRIOT
“…you do not know what a NEOCON is… It is a Conservative that uses sanctions or military action to try and spread Democracy around…”
—————–
NEOCON is a very loose term initially coined by LIBERALS, to stigmatize those who came to their senses and moved to or aligned themselves with the right. Liberals who became social conservatives were called neocons; so were liberals who opposed appeasement. When necessary, the dirty word was applied in more specific contexts. Liberals who did not want the U.S. to withdraw from Vietnam were labeled neocons. Liberals who opposed radical minority factions were also derided as neocons.
But wait! Why not pretend neocons were CONSERVATIVES all along? That way, liberalism wouldn’t be exposed as an epic failure, and once the gullible right appropriated the term, the negative connotation would shift parties. Done! Now any *conservative* who thinks Islamism is a threat to our national security is a vile neocon. If you are pro-Israel, you are the lowest of neocons. Ain’t that a swell twist? It means that commies and Islamists (read: Obum, Ahmed and Bros.) can “spread democracy around the world” as they please, while conservatives who want to stop them are branded as warmongering neocons, both by the pukes on the left and the Paulist useful idiots on the right.
Report Post »rotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:38am@420
Oh, A Ron Paul supporter. The 420 makes much more sense now.
Report Post »Mohawk1773
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 3:29pmThis “Bakko” must be a racist leftist troll.
I know fool, you just can’t get that monkey off your back,
now can you?
Report Post »rotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:17amYeah this is going to end up working in his favor. The allegations are nothing and he didn’t back-track or lie about anything. Herman Cain is a class act and the most viable Republican in the field.
In before the Paulbots come and claim he is an evil Fed Monster that eats babies.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:52amenjoy your fiat.
Report Post »cadmstr01
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:13amThe Paulbots are here to ruin any one that gets in the way, for some reason they think that Ron is the savior of the GOP, when in reality they would probably side with the democrats, I just don’t get it. I bet they voted for hope and change 3 years ago.
Report Post »saranda
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:44amHe backtracked and lied all day. Only when confronted with no choice, did he offer his version of the truth. Besides, the original accusation was about two women and he only spoke to one. Still more lies to be told and uncovered. Any money sent to Cain now might as well just be sent to Obama.
Report Post »Cosmos102
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:09amHerman Cain, you’ve got my vote. I’m also contributing to your campaign.
Report Post »CHRIS260
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:23amAmen!
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:08amI can‘t even believe if that WAS the allegation of what he did it wasn’t laughed out of the room. I could see if he said “You’re about as tall as my wife” and held his hand out horizontally at belt length, otherwise it doesn’t even make sense
but then again we see erroneous charges leveled all day and night thanks to the cottage industry sexual harassment has become for deadbeat employees and citizen ambulance chasers looking for an all too easy pay day.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:08amTo me… Greta is a typical Progressive… who does not really understand Ecomonics… nor Business… but has her Legal Books… and pretends to be a Reporter.
Report Post »Cosmos102
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:15amGreta’s not that bad. She’s an attorney. If Cain couldn’t handle Greta, then he shouldn’t run for President of the U.S. Cain is no man’s fool. He’s not a smooth talking politician…and that’s a BIG plus.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:22amREALLY? progressive? greta is one of the few fair people on fox news. she might even be close to having journalistic integrity. you can’t be serious.
Report Post »rifradio
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:06amI agree with you 100%. Actually most of FN has gone progressive. The 3 idiots in the AM, the following two (John Scott is from my home town), Shepard Smith (another “toy boy”), Geraldo, etc. About the only real Conservatives are Cavuto and most of the time Brett Beier. Hannity is nothing more than a Repub party hack that is trying to con people into thinking otherwise, a ratings hound.
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:29pmShe made a point to stick it to the public when after the casey anthony trial-she interviews some juror with the backdrop of a vacation like ocean landscapte showing us how unperturbed they were in their [ridiculous to many] verdict. She didn’t ask one push back common sense question but rather the whole interview was about how irational and ignorant the public is for daring to be outraged bytheir verdict.This after Fox was pushing this story on us incessantlyas the trial was going on. And so too regarding the amanda knox reversal-not one critica lpush back against the media saturated defense narrative.And of course she’s one sided like the rest of them when it comes to palestinin/israeli conflict and the anti muslim/arab media campagn. She pushed for the wars like the rest of them and now like the rest of them-backs off .With her name -she has to be more pro zionist then the zionists-and I see no journalistic integrity where it would count most!
Report Post »pattybbb1
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:07amWishing him the best.
Report Post »occupylife
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:05amAnd yet the Lame Stream Media gave Bill Clinton a pass while he “Pimped Out” the
Report Post »White House
One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:09amHe didn’t just pimp out the Lincoln bedroom, he was an out and out multiple offending rapist.
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:19amNotice when it’s a Republican with allegations the liberals attack him. In Clinton’s case they went after those evil women who Bill actually did attack. Liberal men are the most disgusting hypocritical womanizing species on the planet. Look at Kennedy (pick one), Wiener, Edwards, Clinton, Spitzer, Andrew Luster (look him up), Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, the list could go on for pages.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:02amgreta v.s. is no friend at all to ANY conservative. we turned her off back when we still watched Fox.. it went downhill quickly into the pro-obamacrapper after GB left it.
Report Post »Dr Vel
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:58pmI knew Fox was starting to turn and join the rest of the media controlled by the state when Glenn left and it was obvious He had seen the writing on the wall. My theory is Fox caved to stop the witch hunt of Murdock over the phone scandal in England. About the time we stopped hearing about the scandal Glenn toned things down yet it was clear He was no longer comfortable with His show on Fox. I started believing Glenn had been given orders by the Fox Execs concerning His content He could not abide. Glenn started creating His new outlet and told us all He was leaving Fox. I gave up watching Fox after Glenn left, looking in every so often to see I was right, Fox was going to the dark side. Greta proved to me I was right by the questions she came after Cain with. Greta should have been considering there is nothing to base this attack against Cain on. Instead of journalism she merely joins the jackals. Just like everyone else on Fox in the last several months. Except for Glenn and a few talk radio and internet outlets truth, true reporting, and honor in the media is gone.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:08amARE YOU KIDDING ME?
Cain has been fox’s flavor of the month since Perry opened his mouth and proved he is a moron.
People aren‘t stupid enough to believe that a guy who wants to raise most people’s taxes is a real conservative for too long. Newt will be their next darling and you’ll love that guy too i bet.
Report Post »rotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:19am@Br@dley
You are a Paulbot. You are programmed to only vote for Ron Paul. If someone disagrees with you on any matter they are a Neocon (aka Jew)
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:26ampaulbot. that’s cute.
Report Post »ACTUALLY, i am too smart to vote for a pro-bailout jackass. i bet you voted for mccain and bush too huh? maybe you should re-evaluate whom you consider programmed.
Br@dley
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:28amJEW?
are you anti semitic sir? you can officially piss off.
Report Post »rotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:34amNeocon is the term you Paulbots use on everyone. Neocon is actually a conservative jewish person or someone that supports Israel. C’mon now.. We both know your just wanting to call everyone a necon. Go ahead it will won’t make your wires short out.
Report Post »Trenaway
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:34am@Br@dley No to church of Ron Paul cultist freaks. You ******** cannot stand a black man winning and your god (Ron Paul) loosing!
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:39am“Neocon is actually a conservative jewish person or someone that supports Israel” this is actually the first time i have heard this. i always thought a neocon was a progressive republican. hmmm, that statement says a bit about you…
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:40am@trenaway, do you know how much you sound like an obama supporter?
HAHAHA! you should just quit right now.
Report Post »rotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:47amEnjoy 10% of the vote in every state because no one takes Ron Paul seriously because of his supporters being arrogant jerks. Go Occupy the Fed.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:57amSome of Ron Paul’s most avid (some say “rabid”) supporters are not friends of America. The Marxist group “Code Pink” are frequent and vociferous supporters of the good congressman
Report Post »http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/09/ron_pauls_poisonous_partisans.html
Br@dley
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:00amyou’re right, i’m the one posting hateful, asinine bs. real mature.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:00amRot carpenter… I’ve been trying to get people behind the occupy the federal reserve, thanks, sarcasm and all :) re your numbers of 10% in every state, well, that‘s a lot better than the last election and if Paul doesn’t get the nomination that’s ok, at least he was successful in creating a discourse on the fed. That growing legacy is more important than you and your joking can currently comprehend. Bradley, thumbs up bud!
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:01amYou sound so childish calling some one a paulbot. Face it, Ron Paul scaring the crap outa you & I love it.
Report Post »FoxNewsLies23
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:16amTrue, they use Israel against Ron Paul when in reality we would help if they needed it. Tell me why Ron Paul gets the most donations from the Military? You lazy fat adults just sit on the sidelines while they risk there lives. If your for war, than strap up.. there waiting. Glenn Beck said the FED can’t be fixed, and Cain said it can be. And since when is it so bad that young adults don’t want their social security money? It won’t exist when there old. One more thing too, what makes you Republicans any better by pulling the race card like they did.. Black on Black HUH? That’s all you got? Paul is the only that will take votes from Obama, not Cain. and your not Neo Cons, your just used, washed up, unintelligent people. Keep drinking that Alcohol.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:26amGreta’s view is obvious. It is not objective. Her interview is useless. It is biased.
Report Post »Fox disappoints me
ramburner
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:27amI also stopped watching when Glenn left. I also confirmed my suspicions after Glenn left Fox by tuning in once in a while. O’Reilly used to be the best at calling a spade a spade. But when Glenn came on, O’Reilly was found to be nothing but a lightweight. Now that Glenn is gone, there is no reason to watch Fox. Cain should have never denied anything, if what he says is true, the woman took him to task for making a remark about her height and his wife’s height, then he should have come out with the whole truth very early and NOT denied it. At best, his denial and lack of truthful response shows we are all human, at worst it labels him as a typical politician. We do NOT need more of the typical Candidates in office. Well, for now, we’ll forgive him and move on. Cain seems to be the best of the GOP Candidates.
Report Post »FoxNewsLies23
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:27am“want there social security”. early!
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:31amFox is not a conservative station in the ideological sense the way MSNBC is a liberal station. Fox is an organ of the Republican Party. Their purpose is to help Republicans get elected. Last year when the objective was to target enough seats to take Congress they felt the way to do it was to encourage hard right rabble rousing. This year when the presidency is the grand prize, they think the way to do it is to rein on the monster they created and nominate someone moderate enough to stand some chance in the general election.
Report Post »ADNIL
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:51amI came to the same conclusions as you and don’t watch much of Fox anymore. Too much azz kissing going on behind the scenes. I wonder how many others feel the same way and would really like to know how much their ratings have dropped since Glenn left. I tune into GBTV every night rather than Fox. Take that, Murcock.
Report Post »rotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:49amI’m deathly afraid of Ron Paul as he continues to gain zero support and has been stuck at 8-12% the whole election. He has his base and nothing else. I am quite scared!
Occupy the Fed!
Ron Paul 2012…. for Dog Catcher
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:57am@carpenter – Don’t believe the polls they tell you. It’s false
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:54amrotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:49am
I’m deathly afraid of Ron Paul as he continues to gain zero support and has been stuck at 8-12%
===================================================================
You’ll need that 8 – 12% in the general election though if you plan on seeing Obama as a 1-termer…
I know that I won’t be voting for another liberal like Cain, Romney, Perry, or Gingrich in the general election….I‘ll write in Ron Paul’s name instead if I’m forced to choose between another liberal from the GOP and Obama.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:57pmSo Cain is a liar. Cain who swore that he had no knowledge of the settlement during the press conference now tells a different story on Fox. Cain who has flip-flopped on abortion, shows no knowledge of foriegn policy, has been all over the map with regards to his 999 plan and the national sales tax (which he once opposed), now this. Is Cain really the best the GOP has or just a bad joke or both.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:42amThe jokes on you Encinom. The Imposter-in-Chief couldn‘t carry Cain’s jock strap. Obomination is a has been, all washed up and will get his azz trounced if he makes it to November 2110.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:53amYes Encinom, a liar is a liar and those wanting to support him… Nothing new with some out there pushing another lying slime ball into the presidency. I like his stance that this is happening because his plans are unassailable, that tends to happen when he has yet to explain further than 9-9-9 is really 9-0-9….. Some kinds brilliant statement smacking of 2+2=4… and 5.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:01am@carboneyes, another blind sheep. Address the issues, Cain has changes his position on the issues to fit the current news cycle and now he is a proven liar. So why do you support him? because is pro choice when he is not pro-life? Cause is for or against a national sales tax depending on the audience he is addressing. cause he has no idea about foreign policy? Really what is the basis of the support.
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:25amUmm I‘ll bite you obamanikgog Let’s see he is not slick Willy and the girls is is nor is he Ted the Lion left a girl dying in a lake nor is he JFK whose wife left him once for Onassis boat trip cause a MM nor is he John had a baby while his wife was sick Edwards nor is he slime the Dem’s attack on ClarenceThomas nor is he the black man who Sarah Palin dated gossip (slime Sara and a black man in one liberal wagging tongue target) just a liar according to a troll wanting attention flack attack dirt bag. Nor is he Jimmy Carter who once said he lusted after women. Want more? Even if he flirted with a woman who “allegedly” had a problem I would reckon it was fun at the time. How does that jive with solving the as Bill Clinton would say it’s the economy stupid. Which is what this election will be about. So what the abortion–won’t matter. So what if Mormon or Christian-won’t matter. So what foreign policy-Obama hired Hillary. Mr. Cain can’t do better? Than 30 czars and a twisted mind? He is an AMERICAN and you need to get over it. You are the joke.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:41amSo TexasGranny, you have blinders on, you don’t care the Cain lied about a small matter, has in the matter of 24 hours changed his opinion on abortion to match the audience he faced, face with push back has change his 999 plan when critics raise questions. I hope this joke wins the GOP nomination.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:44amrotcarpenter
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:34am
Neocon is the term you Paulbots use on everyone. Neocon is actually a conservative jewish person or someone that supports Israel.
===========================================================
Israel is not the 51st State in the Union….
You can write as many checks out of your own bank account as you want to to the Ministry of Finance in Tel Aviv, there’s nothing stopping you from doing that.
There’s nothing in the US Constitution that authorizes the redistribution of foreign aid money taken from the US taxpayer to foreign countries (including Israel).
Report Post »Amazona
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:55pmoh good, thanks for posting the interview because I just left a comment on it on the other posting by Hallowell that I found to be not Blaze worthy material to me:
After watching the interview with Greta, I don’t appreciate Billy Hallowell pushing something when he is not even sure of the interview and of what Byron Yorks writes, what’s the point? This was like a TMZ gossip writeup.
Report Post »1accord
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:50pmHe should have known this allegation was coming. I hope he utilizes all the free publicity well. It‘s not the allegations it’s how he handles it that matters to me.
Report Post »Ohio4Tea
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:48pmMr. Cain is clean. In one year, he will be “President Cain”.
Remember to vote next week regardless of whether there are “important issues” or not. It matters. It really really matters!
And support Ohio’s issues 2 and 3 as much as you can! This one matters FOR SURE
Report Post »honor007
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:43amOHIO NEEDS SUPPORT FOR SB5!!!!
We cannot let the Unions repeal this. I don’t want our State Bankrupt. Vote Yes on Issue 2
Plus, a vote YES on Issue 3, down with Obamacare!
Anyone with friends and family in OHIO, please connect with them on these issues.
Report Post »Help in Ohio~
Very, Very Important! Thanks~
encinom
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:04amIts not the Unions but the citizens of Ohio that are standing up to the Koch brothers and their paid lackeys in state government. The Citizens don’t what the law.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:53amyes on 1, 2 and 3.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:47pmI don’t remember anyone asking Clinton anything like this .. and he was accused of actual ASSAULT! Two sets of “rules” one for Liberals (getting a PASS) and one for Conservatives (trying to destroy them!) .. I am sick of the double standard. Where was Politico when Obama was running .. why no vetting of him and his Marxist friends. Why still no vetting of Obama?
TEA!
Report Post »crazyrightwingmom
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:47pmHe is a real person, an honest person, and the left cannot stand it. Actually, they don’t even recognize what an honest person looks like any more!!
Report Post »encinom
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:58pmHe’s a honest person that lied to press during a national press conference.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:58amthe left isn’t doing anything. They have Obama in office.
Report Post »king1
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:12amencinom- your just one of those freaky ron paul supports face he is way to far out there I would sooner vote for gary johnson
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:52amKing… You just called a lot of the founding fathers, president Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, … And many more ” Too far out there.” His ideas are not new, they’re quite old actually.
Report Post »Return printing of our nations money to congress: So far out there it’s in the constitution. We shouldn’t nation build or get involved in foreign wars, wow crazy, a founding ideal in the face of brittains empire.
That 9-11 was in part a result of our foreign medling: so crazy that the CIA said the exact same thing.
That the IRS is a racket, hmmm Ronald Reagan formed a commission that found all income tax monies were paid didrectly to the federal reserve to pay for the printing of our money.
That the department of education should be abolished, lol, yes that’s insane too.
And yes his idea to slash 1 trillion in spending and get rid of. Many unconstitutional administrations and government lackeys. Imagine all the EPA people no longer having any work!! The IRS out of business !!!! Yes it’s so insane it gives me a woddy that there is still a politician out there willing to do what it takes to really return government to the people.
I could go on and on with how ‘crazy’ Ron Paul is…
JLGunner
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:07amI think we all agree that barack has got to go no matter who the replacemenrt. Sounds a little knee-jerk , but even though I think Ron is nutty as hell, I would definantly take him over barack We need to look at who poses the greatest threat to our beloved constitution.
Report Post »Dougral Supports Israel
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:46pmEveryone who is alive has a Roman eye. The question should be, does he have Russian hands?
Report Post »