Gingrich Nets Influential Newspaper Endorsement in N.H.
- Posted on November 27, 2011 at 8:15am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
Newt Gingrich clinched a major endorsement from the New Hampshire Union Leader on Sunday. (AP)
Republican presidential contender Newt Gingrich clinched the endorsement of the influential New Hampshire Union Leader Sunday, a significant boost for the former House Speaker’s surging campaign.
“We are in critical need of the innovative, forward-looking strategy and positive leadership that Gingrich has shown he is capable of providing,” the state’s largest newspaper said in its front-page editorial.
“A lot of candidates say they’re going to improve Washington,” it said. “Newt Gingrich has actually done that, and in this race he offers the best shot of doing it again.”
Gingrich came in second place in a recent poll of likely New Hampshire Republican voters, garnering 15 percent support to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s first-place 42 percent.
The same poll placed Texas Rep. Ron Paul in third place with 12 percent and former Utah Gov. John Huntsman at 8 percent.
According to the Associated Press, with six weeks to go until the primary, the Union Leader’s endorsement could prove significant with its “conservative editorial stance that proudly works to influence elections, from school boards to the White House, in the politically savvy state.” The paper endorsed eventual GOP nominee Sen. John McCain in 2008, prior to his win in the state, though backed Steve Forbes in 2000 and Pat Buchanan in 1992.
“We don’t have to agree with them on every issue,” the editorial said. “We would rather back someone with whom we may sometimes disagree than one who tells us what he thinks we want to hear.”
The newspaper’s endorsement could be considered a setback for Romney, who despite frontrunner status has failed to capture widespread conservative support among the GOP base. According to the AP, Romney has lobbied for the paper’s support, including having dinner with its publisher earlier this year.
According to NBC, the Gingrich campaign said they were “honored to have the endorsement” and called it “an enormous boost to our campaign.”
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 692 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 496 Comments
Obama: RNC Like Watching ‘Black-and-White TV’ Because Romney ‘Did Not Offer a Single New Idea’ 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 346 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 331 Comments
Faith
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 315 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 331 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 239 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 315 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (235)
TSG-01
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:18amThey couldn’t find a RINO enough Republican and Ron Paul has been picking up too much steam. Time to roll out a progressive dressed in conservative attire…
Watch how fast the media anoints this clown. He was a joke in the 90‘s and he’s an even bigger joke now.
Look, if Bill Clinton “likes” him, nuff said.
Report Post »BluifoxEd
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:24amWho cares if ANY media endorses him.
WE ARE TEA!!!!!
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:32amCommonsense, commonsense tells us that Gingrich is not a conservative. He is an internationalist, by his words and actions. He does not see America as a unique sovereign nation, just like Obama and Clinton.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:59am@ smackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:32am
Commonsense, commonsense tells us that Gingrich is not a conservative. He is an internationalist, by his words and actions. He does not see America as a unique sovereign nation, just like Obama and Clinton.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
And he’s right. You spend an awful lot of time being wrong. Hell even the article tells the story of how even the right wings progressotards view Gingrich.
“We are in critical need of the innovative, “FORWARD-LOOKING” strategy and positive leadership that Gingrich has shown he is capable of providing,” the state’s largest newspaper said in its front-page editorial.
Forward looking is the word ALL progressives use to define themselves. It’s been preconditioned since Joe McCarthy to hide their Marxist beliefs.
But by all means, don’t allow the truth to get in the way of your always delusional rants.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:14pmOne is a Champion.
The others are CHAMELEONS.
I’m still holding out hope that “Blaze” readers will wake up in time.
Report Post »AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:23pmClown? The clown is in the White House, and you must be one of his minions.
Report Post »John 1776
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:57pmOK, I’ll be one of the lone voices to defend Newt. The guy learns as he goes, and has changed his view on things. Not perfect by a long shot, but listen to him in the debates- This guy is the one who can out-debate Obama, and that is what it will come down to. He makes a lot of sense when he talks and people are starting to listen. Obama has a one billion dollar war-chest waiting to unleash on whoever becomes the opponent. I am sure research crews have a tear-down campaign ready to unleash for each of the contenders and it will only be a matter which book they open up once the choice is made. I am sure the “Book of Newt” is a big one, but it doesn’t matter. It will be a slander and destruction of character no matter who we choose. Might as well select the one that thinks fastest on his feet. Newt would still be a magnitude better then Obama in office.
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 5:17pmthis is going to look ugly. they thought it will be easy ride with Perry or Romney. No way. First they had unexpected surge of Mr. Cain, so they dump stuff on him. But perry or
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 5:45pmJohn, I have said it before and I will say it again, if a candidate has to change his stance on anything or move toward the center, left or right in order to get votes, they are lying to you. We are not electing a debator and Chief. I for one am voting for the Constitution this time around. I hope everyone wakes up to the point that the Constitution is what can save us.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 7:56pmMore bad Newt
Report Post »- Bailed out savings and loan institutions in 1991. $40B Bank bailout
04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine (anti 1st Amendment legislation)
10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps
03/–/1993 – He was “passionately in favor” of sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia
11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act
11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N
04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion)
04/10/1995 – He supported Federal taxdollars being spent on abortions
06/–/1995 – He wrote the foreword to a book about tearing down the U.S. Constitution and implementing a Fascist World Government – Alvin Toffler‘s ’The Third Wave’
06/01/1996 – He helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat constitutionalist Ron Paul in the 1996 election
11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment”
11/29/2006 – He called for a “Geneva Convention for terrorists” so it would be clear who the Constitution need not apply to
02/15/2007 – He supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps
10/16/2009 – He angered conservatives by endorsing super liberal Dede Scozzafava
02/10/2011 – He wants to replace the EPA instead
KTsayz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 8:01pm“What we’re being told is that free trade with Mexico would devastate the U.S. economy. With its low wages, Mexico would unleash a flood of cheap imports into our markets. There would be a mass exodus of U.S. factory jobs, as hordes of American companies fled across the border…. All this is scare talk.” – Newt Gingrich, on the House floor 9/22/1993
Q: “Will you rally the troops for GATT and the World Trade Organization?”
A: “Yes. In the first place, the Administration has accepted amendments of Senator Dole and myself giving Congress dramatically more oversight of the WTO, including the right to bring up a vote on withdrawal every five years in perpetuity, so at any point that we think it is out of control or inappropriate, we can simply withdraw.” – Newt Gingrich, 11/11/1994
“The American challenge in leading the world is compounded by our Constitution. Under our [constitutional system] – either we’re going to have to rethink our Constitution, or we’re going to have to rethink our process of decision-making.” He went on to profess an oxymoronic belief in“very strong but limited federal government,” and pledged, “I am for the United Nations.” – Newt Gingrich, July 1995, speech at the Center for Strategic & International Affairs
UGH No Newt No Newt No Newt
Report Post »Grey Eagle
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 8:51pmThis is a very small state.
Report Post »Falsegods
Posted on November 28, 2011 at 12:26pmA slimy newt, he is proud of the NWO, he wrote a book on it.
Report Post »Don’t be led by evil.
InfoWars.com
Faith1029
Posted on November 28, 2011 at 4:42pmI believe Newt and don’t believe he will say and do anything to get elected. I don’t care if he has changed his mind on certain issues. Times change and people change. I know I’ve changed my mind politically over the years. The fact he came out and said he did a few things he shouldn’t have done, and also asked forgiveness from his God is good enough for me. He is older and wiser now and I do believe he has this country’s best interests at heart. He is a very intelligent man, has much experience and could defeat Obama. I think he would make a great President.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on November 28, 2011 at 6:12pmIt’s sad to me that some people post very ignorant things, and then never come back to read replies to their post — they might learn something — oh well — such is life.
Report Post »The Bove
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:17amNewt wants to be President for the sake of being President. His past comments and actions and his current back peddling shows he is a liar .
Report Post »The Union Leader endorsment means nothing. I’m from NH and it has been taken over by libs from Mass who moved to escape the taxes, but are slowing turning the state into MA north. Good old conservative NH is long gone. That’s why I left. The state is doing well relative to others but will continue to decline as the progressive take over continues.
The UL is a tool for the system. McCain? Newt? Are those the endorements of a conservative org that wants to rescue America? The Rs are as bad as the Ds and the Paulies may just give the admin a second term.
I guess I’ll vote my conscience and pray for the best.
John 1776
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 5:00pmRon Paul stated in a debate, “So what if Iran gets nukes?” That statement floored me, and made him an unacceptable candidate for my primary vote. That being said, WHOEVER gets the nom will get my vote as any of them are a better choice than Obama. Obama is counting on conservatives to be divided and if we are, he will win in 2012.
Report Post »Jeff65
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 5:54pmJohn 1776
I think you will find that Ron Paul doesn`t want them to have a nuke either. If you look more closely at the context of what he is saying you will see that he is trying to educate you with 30 second to 60 second responses. The idea is that you need to look at the big picture with history and the future as a backdrop.
The war mongers want you to fear so that they can take you to war and gain greater power over you.
Think about the current nuke situation with Russia and China essentially backing up Iran.
Think about how Bin Ladin said that he would destroy the economy of the US by dragging the US into all sorts of wars and that the neocons wouldn`t be able to resist.
The only way we will be truely safe is if we wipe every person off the face of the earth. Therefore we should do only what is right and have faith instead of fear. The right thing to do is to mind our own business, stop preemptive wars, and trade and have diplomatic relations with all the countries. If anyone dares raise a hand against the US then strike swiftly and then get out. Creating economic superiority will also do much to make the US safer.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 8:04pmJohn, please tell me how any American president was able to stop anyone from getting a nuke. Ron Paul is just stating a fact that Iran also wants nukes, not that he believes they should have nukes.
Report Post »If you actually did your homework, as Beck begs for us to do, you would not be writing nonsense comments.
Vechorik
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:23amI laughed out loud when Romney said “If you elect Obama, Iran will get nukes. Elect me and Iran won’t get nukes” WHAT THE HECK DOES HE THINK? China and Russia are helping Iran get nukes. Iran will have nukes eventually — one year — five years — ten years — it doesn’t matter. We have to live in a world where Iran (and other countries) will have nukes. Romney, nor any other president can’t prevent Iran from having nukes unless they want to go to war with Russia and China as well.
We have to live in that world.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:05amIt’s coming down to Ron Paul.
Report Post »libh8er
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:17amYou said it….. “down’.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:13pmKeep dreaming .
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:33pmVote for anyone but Ron Paul and you’ll get more of the same… big government! Most Republicans and Democrats are all the same these days – corrupt and greedy.
I stand behind the Constitution – NOT a party line. Ron Paul can win … he has a LOT more supporters than just what you see on the Blaze – get use to it.
BTW – his age and experience are a bonus! Read his book ‘Foreign Policy’ if you want the full history on how we got into our current mess. He’s been warning us for years – you might want to listen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoP0ItndrAk&feature=related
Report Post »John 1776
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 1:24pmIf Paul gets in you can kiss Israel goodbye. It will just be a glass block of fused sand. Paul has some great ideas, but it will allow WWIII to take place. Iran’s motivations are not Political, they are Biblical. We have never experienced a nation who’s leadership is willing to martyr their own country, but that’s what we have with Iran. We need to wake up to this, and Paul is still in slumber mode.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 2:09pm@John 1776 – Ron Paul supports Israel 100%! It’s the other GOPs that want to keep funding Palestine.
It was America’s intervention into Israel’s business that caused them to give back the land they fought for! Ron Paul does not support that type of ‘intervention’ because he knows doing so only makes matters worse — history has taught us that much – over and over again.
If you truly support Israel – don’t vote for anyone that supports funding their enemies.
Ron would support a ‘declared’ war on Iran if that time comes.. He would ensure the war could be won — Get in..kick butt.. get out! All others would keep our troops there for years – which DOES NOT work. Haven’t we figured that out already!
Report Post »CptStubbing
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 2:13pmAre you joking? Are entire government is priming for world war 3 as we speak. Obama is ******* everybody off. He is bombing Pakistan and trying to put a missile system next to Russia. Russia seems to be pretty pissed about it. Attacking Iran is not off the table for this administration either. The Republican nominees are worse. They will attack Iran; diplomacy seems to be out-the-window for these guys. Not only are they talking about attacking Iran, now they also want to attack Central America. World War 3 is going to happen unless we get somebody into the White House who is willing to stop our ever expanding aggression toward the rest of the world. We represent 6% of the population on this planet, the other 94% are only going to put up with us for so much longer.
Report Post »Judle
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 2:22pmRon Paul would be one of the last persons we need in the White House. He’s a liberal and we have had enough of liberals for a lifetime.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 2:40pmJUDLE — Do you understand the difference between Liberal and Libertarian??
Liberal = Left progressive (democrat); Big government, Socialism – Redistribution of wealth.
Libertarian = small government – holds individual liberty and responsibility as the basic moral principle of society – advocating strict limits to government activity. Constitutional
Big difference!
Report Post »John 1776
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 5:03pmThis post showed up in the wrong thread for some reason, so here it is again: Ron Paul stated in a debate, “So what if Iran gets nukes?” That statement floored me, and made him an unacceptable candidate for my primary vote. That being said, WHOEVER gets the nom will get my vote as any of them are a better choice than Obama. Obama is counting on conservatives to be divided and if we are, he will win in 2012.
Report Post »Rob
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 5:49pmA vote for Paul is a vote for Obama….
The ONLY way Paul can run is third party and that will put Obama in for four more.
DON’T do it Paul!
Report Post »MUDFLAPS
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:45pmnow thats funny, really, I dont care who you are.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:55amAnti Second Amendment… anti immigration control… pro abortion… anti Israel… is there anything Gnewt or Cain can do for this country other than slide it deeper into socialism? Cain’s 9-9-9 plan- more ghetto freebies and liberal ‘don’t tax the blacks’ theology. Anyone who thinks paying 27 percent taxes is a good thing is a fool.
Report Post »lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:15amYou sir … are a propangandist … to be polite. Cain’s 9-9-9 plan and then subsequent 0-0-23 Fair Tax plan they will be implemented shortly after the public is educated (that you obviously are clueless about now) is be a BOOM in this country and MAKE every pay into the system. The pimp, the hookers, the illegals, the black market, et al git a FREE PASS now on paying any taxes. Also the 47% of Americans who don’t pay taxes would pay. The 9% and 23% is NOT ADDED ON TOP OF WHAT WE PAY NOW! When a company makes a product or produces a service – they factor in their tax overhead cost. When you no longer have a TAX BURDEN – the cost goes down. The sales tax is then put in place of it and in most case the products/service will be cheaper. Do you homework before you make an asinine comment.
http://999calculator.net/
Report Post »http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_faq
BenFranklinLivesHere
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:05pmIt‘s a toss up as to who’s the biggest liar between Newt and Romney. Only a complete fool would believe anything either of them say. Herman Cain is just unelectable. Besides, his 9-9-9 plan would never get through congress. Just sayin.
Report Post »Archstone
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:50amSure, let’s send the oldest, white-haired guy up against Obama again. That alone gives Obama
Report Post »an edge we don’t need him to have.
TelepromoterNChief
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:23amObama colors his hair since it goes grey like a “typical white person.”
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:04pmI for one am glad no Republican candidates use teleprompters. They don’t, right.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:44pmSince when did civilized people stop respecting their elders and appreciating their experiences?
If we‘d shut up and listen once in a while we might just learn something from the ’old guy’ — Ron Paul is the definition of a true Founding Father – never wavers from Constitutional principles.
I’ll take “old” over ….greedy/power-hungry/flip-flopping arrogance any day!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on November 28, 2011 at 6:09pmYou realize that age discrimination is against Federal law? Just as is racial discrimination.
Besides, I was taught that “with age, comes wisdom.”
You see, Newt Gingrich – who previously warned of the dangers of the Patriot Act – now wants it expanded.
He wants amnesty, too – to keep American citizens footing the bill for government services for illegal immigrants.
Learn about Unted Nations Agenda 21 before you vote! (and you’ll run far, far away from Newt!)
Report Post »NILAP
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:37amMSM mission: Promote Newt as the anti-Romney. Discredit and dismiss the rest of the crowd. Newt or Romney – business as usual.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:36amNew Hampshire Union Leader? Are you kidding me? The only one it influences is my parrot. He reads it before he takes a dump and is the most radical one in my family.
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:26amEveryone seems to think that by getting rid of Obummer everything will be rosy. Wrong. The situation we are in now has been over 40 years in the making, ever since Johnson’s “Great Society” programs were put in place. The economy was tanking when Obummer got elected, all he has done is drive the nail a little deeper into our coffin. Whether it’s Newt, Romney, Perry, Cain, Paul, or Bachman isn’t going to make much difference. Like Humpty-Dumpty, America is broken, and all the king‘s horses and men can’t put it together again. All we can do is watch and wait, and hope something good arises from the ashes. Meanwhile, everyone should quit worrying about politics so much and worry about how they are going to survive when the meltdown occurs.
Report Post »TexanRon
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:35amOf course it can be fixed. Nearly anything can be fixed, but only if we can put politicians in office that have the guts and courage to do what needs to be done. There are many oxes, both Repub & Dem, that need a serious goring. The screaming outrage will be deafening, but we must remain deaf to such cries. I believe, still, in the glory and the strength of America, and as such, will not give in or up.
Report Post »lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:42amWrong. Cain is the only one with a radical overhaul of the progressive tax code and repeal of the 16th Amendment; imposing the Chilean model for Social Security and give the states back the Medicare/Medicaid fiasco to run as they see fit. Get a majority in both houses and a Cain presidency and this country will be changed!!!!
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:06amlifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:42am
Cain is the only one with a radical overhaul of the progressive tax code
==================================================
Huh???!:
“BURNETT: Does America still need affirmative action?
CAIN: Well, let’s talk about how I would address that same problem. I believe in empowerment zones. Most of the unemployed black Americans in this country are in these mostly economically depressed areas. It could be, and I’m only using this as an example, because we haven’t finished establishing the parameters yet. Instead of in a designated empowerment zone, it being 9-9-9, it could be, as an example only, 3-3-3.
What this does, because you have a lot of African-Americans located in cities like Detroit, disproportionately, it would encourage businesses to stay in business there or to move there. It would encourage people to work there, because if you live in the empowerment zone, you’re going to pay a smaller percentage in taxes.”
Report Post »http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1110/13/ebo.01.html
ShyMan
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:16amThe Gingrich who stole Christmas?
Really?
You can’t trust him.
I’d rather have Ubama than someone
that would stab you in the back.
At least with Ubama we know who the
enemy is.
“I know your works, that you are neither
Report Post »cold nor hot. I could wish you were
cold or hot. So then, because you are
lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot,
I will vomit you out of My mouth.”
(Revelation 3:15, 16 NKJV)
TWO BITS
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:08amThis country is in dire straits, and everyone’s hero or heroine is not running in 2012. Gingrich is not my first choice, but he has a command of the issues and is aggressive on the campaign trail. He may not always be right, but he does not kow-tow to the liberal media.
Report Post »On a related note, Perry has the endorsement of Sheriff Joe Arpaio who will campaign with him in New Hampshire.
lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:18amBoth Perry and Gingrich put illegals in the front of the line – in-state tuition (Perry) and legal status (Newt) despite the crime we know about coming here illegally. Nevermind the crime(s) of stealing someone’s SS# or making up one or working in this country as a foreigner without paying into the system. Give it another month and the polling numbers for Newt will come back down as they did for Perry. Cain, Bachmann and Santorum will pick up those votes.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:36am@ TWO BITS
Report Post »Gingrich is a conservative only because he says he is, not because of what he does or has done. He is a POLITITION. He will say anything, and has, to get elected. He is pro amnesty while telling us he is not and redefining the word. He is a big government main stream Republican, not a conservative.
If he is the Republican candidate, I will not vote for him.
slr4528
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:32pmWhat I find telling is that the Union leader said the open borders Perry guy was their 2nd choice after the amnesty endorsing Gingrich. In 2008 the Union leader endorsed pro-Amnesty McCain…does anyone observe a trend?
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:52pm@ slr4528
Report Post »If there are 13,000,000 illegals who have come to this country to work, doesn’t that mean that there are 13,000.000 legals who’s jobs they have taken? And, the unions are on the side of the illegals instead of their members?
Businesses want cheap labor and are willing to bribe … oops … donate to Gingrich to keep the illegals here, but why do the unions want them?
TheBritshRcmg
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 1:08pmHe is a rino. Beware. Newt speaks with a silver tongue.
Report Post »Who else do you know speaks with a silver tongue? The guy in the White House. I forget his name…..
Rob
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:51amAll we need to remember when we pull the lever next year is this: ANYBODY BUT OBAMA OR RON PAUL!
The Paulites may sink this nation if we don’t remember that…
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:12amThe difference is, 0bama would take the country down from within and Ron Paul would make it easy for our foreign enemies to do it.
Report Post »db321
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:43amAny body but Obama – easy to say – in reality it’s going to come down to “Self Interest over Country”. Anyone with half a brain would relieve that another 4 years of Obama and the America that we all know is over.
I’ve heard it all – If Ron Paul doesn’t get the Republican nominee, then he is going to run as an Independent – Obama wins then and it’s Game over for America. All because half of the Country want legalized Pot as Ron promised – shame on Paul supporters.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:02amLet‘s compare Newt’s support here to say… Ron Paul’s in New Hampshire.
Newt (per this article) get’s the endorsement of the influential New Hampshire Union Leader.
Ron Paul get’s the support of White supremacists (David Duke types), their publications and websites. Stormfront.com., various anarchist publications and sites…
Oh yes… I could go on… lol.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:13amdb321,
Report Post »If Ron Paul throws this election to 0bama, we‘ll know that he’s a Democrat plant. At this point, for several reasons, I wouldn’t be surprised.
KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:11pmYepImaConservative
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:02am
Let‘s compare Newt’s support here to say… Ron Paul’s in New Hampshire.
Newt (per this article) get’s the endorsement of the influential New Hampshire Union Leader.
Ron Paul get’s the support of White supremacists (David Duke types), their publications and websites. Stormfront.com., various anarchist publications and sites…
===============================================================
Think this gal is a racist, YepImAConservative?:
“Kathryn DeLong: 100 Reasons For Ron Paul”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoFvHpnPJFE&feature=youtu.be
Why don’t you pick another line of attack, YepImAConservative?….this one‘s gettin’ pretty stale…….
Of course, we know that Newt’s not a racist…..and he’s got the video to prove it:
“Newt Gingrich Al Sharpton Education Tour”
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwDoTg-Kljw
Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:57pmThe ‘source’ of Ron Paul’s campaign donations has NEVER influenced his principles – unlike other candidates that flip on their values depending on which way the money is flowing.
I don’t care who donates to Dr. Paul’s campaign – as long as he stays true to the Constitution!
Is legalizing pot your biggest worry…really? You think keeping it illegal stops anyone? Get a clue. More people are hooked on (and dying from) legal drugs than illegal drugs… but that’s OK, because the government makes $$ from those drugs.. Geezzeee.
No wonder this country is in such a mess. Grow up, take personal responsibility, and stop looking for big government to chase away all the scary monsters under your bed.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 1:11pmPeace is not the absence of conflict. It is the ability to handle conflict through peaceful means. Ronald Reagan.
Wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows. Martin Luther King Jr.
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. Abraham Lincoln.
I guess none of these guys knew what the heck they were talking about? Nation building is not making us stronger.. we are growing weaker by the day… take a good look at where we are and how we got here.
Continuing to do the SAME things over and over again expecting different results is called insanity.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 1:29pm>KID. LMAO!
If that’s getting “old” (old and “ignore” to a Paul supporter means… STOP youw’re hoowting ouwr feewings… we weelly weelly beweeve ignowance of Pauwl’s powicies and our White supwemacist/anti-semetic/anarchist base is bwiss).
Okay. You want me to keep posting about Paul’s Liberal stances on drug legalization and decriminalization, foriegn policy and isolationism?
Fact is… you don’t ever want to see anything negative regarding Paul because you live in Paul Libertopia where only you and your ilk get to bash the those who are aware of the “fringe” chaos you amateurs espouse for America. We have enough of that now with the “other” Liberal amateurs in charge.
I know my postings cheese you Paul supporters off. That in itself gives me singular satisfaction. Don’t like it? Too bad. You may choose not respond (I really don’t care), but I know you’ll never be ignoring… you’ll be reading every word with your teeth clenched and the liitle veins in your pencil necks bulging. Lol.
I know my postings cheese you all
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 1:36pmGive it a rest GALT. When a Paul supporter starts quoting Reagan and Lincoln you are nothing more than disingenous at best… hypocrates at worst.
Nice Paul commercial though… lol.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 2:16pm@yeppie… Sorry…No time to rest.. we’ve been doing that for long enough.
“It is not we non-interventionists who are isolationists. The real isolationists are those who impose sanctions and embargos on countries and people across the globe and who choose to use FORCE overseas to promote democracy. A counterproductive approach that actually leads the U.S. to be more resented and more isolated in the world.” Ron Paul
Ron Paul 2012!!
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 4:15pmSorry Galt… Paul IS an “isolationist.” He’s for withdrawing all our Military forces back to Fortress America and leaving the rest of the world’s nations allies and enemies alike… to fight it out among themselves whatever the reason… even if it has, or will have an impact on us and our national security down the road. The best defense is a good and proper offense IMO.
You brought up Ronald Reagan. Reagan for instance fought Soviet influence in Central America everywhere he could and with whomever he could find it with. Reagan exploited every opportunity to weaken the Soviet Union in Europe. He worked with the Vatican in Poland. He deployed Pershing short-range nuclear warheads in Western Europe. He called the Soviet Union an evil empire. He began developing the Strategic Defense Initiative. And he walked away from an arms control agreement when he decided it was a bad deal for the U.S. Reagan would probably understand that supporting elections that are likely to bring a terrororist group like Hamas or Hezbollah into power is not an American interest. Reagan would also understand that toppling a pro-American dictator like Mubarak in favor of the mob we see now is not sound policy and that move is likely to bring an anti-American authoritarian successor regime to power. I think Reagan would be very nervous at what we are witnessing today in Egypt and Syria both.
Ron Paul would have his head isolated in his rectum searching for gold nuggets.
.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 5:48pmYippe.. I think Ron Paul would agree with most of Reagan’s moves. You‘re wrong in thinking Ron Paul would not kick butt when ’necessary’.
There is a HUGE difference is defending our national security and defending oil assets (which don’t belong to us). We certainly don’t need 900 military bases around the world to protect our country.. Is there any wonder others see us as ‘occupiers’ and want to take us down.
We must drill our own oil and stop using the excuse of oil dependency for our war games. And by the way…we can’t drill here until we stop allowing the EPA to call all of the shots. Ron Paul is the only one willing to take them on.
Our recent ‘illegal’ wars are all about the oil… not about our safety – don’t let them fool you with the scare tactics! There have always been terrorists.. there will ALWAYS be terrorists. You can’t kill everyone that hates us… we’d better figure out a better way.
Why do you think Ron Paul gets 3-times as many donations from military personnel than all other candidates combined? Maybe they’re on to something… you think?
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 6:17pmGALT. I’ll go with what I know and what Paul has said, not how you would like me to interpret it.
I‘ll say this before and I’ll say it again… Military donation numbers have been easily skewed by overzealous Paul supporters. Give a Paul supporter the internet, a piggie bank, a question as to “occupation” …information which does not have to be verified under $200.00.
Did you know that Ron Paul won the VVS polls, Straw polls, online polls, TV Presidential polls and debate polls? He77, he should be leading evvvvverywhere huh? Lmao!!
Did you know that “Atlas Shrugged” most times out of 10 wins college on-line polls as the bestest, bestest, bestest book ever?
Don’t try to BS an old Soldier sonny.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on November 28, 2011 at 9:49amNow see Yeppie.. That’s why people can’t have good debates any more. When you don’t agree with something you start the juvenile behavior.
You ‘may’ be an old soldier.. . but sir, I am NO ‘sonny’. Have a great day!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EKaq4qoQvOs
Report Post »4X4in
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:46amNobody to vote for. AGAIN!
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:18amHang in there. The fat lady didn’t sing yet.
Report Post »TelepromoterNChief
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:27amFat lady?
Report Post »You mean to tell me thunder thighs Michelle is going to run?
Totally Domestic
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 1:01pmSarah are you listening??????? We need you!
Report Post »conservativewoman
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:45amThose who cannot forgive will never receive forgiveness.
Report Post »lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:53amTell that to the wives Gingrich committed adultery on – of which God does give us an out – divorce. Yes you can forgive but that doesn’t mean you need to be a doormat for your spouse, nor do I want to be a doormat to political hack.
Report Post »mydogtippy
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:24amLifelinz: Please go back to Newt and his immigaration I reply to you about what you said on commentons, I hoe you agree with me on that I think it is a good idea.
Report Post »lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:54amYes – I read your comments on Congree raising the sales tax a whim but there are 3 major factors you are overlooking:
1) The budget will get back in balance quicker when we start cutting and this economy gets in overdrive with a national sales tax and EVERY business in the world does business here with a 9 and then 0% income tax. When the budget is balanced and taxes coming into the coffers to cover everything and then some – Congress will have no need to raise the sales tax.
2) Every single PERSON in this country would be PISSED if they tried to raise the sales tax because it affects ALL. Right now – 47% of citizens pay NOTHING so of course they will not pressure law makers – as matter of fact they could care less because the rich pay most of the taxes. Also illegals could care less because they PAD NOTHING now and suck up our resources. When a sales tax is in place – NOW NO ONE CAN LOBBY AGAINST ANY CLASS BECAUSE WE ALL PAY!
3) The President can veto any raise if it ever got to his desk
Report Post »mydogtippy
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:54amLifelinz : I forgot about the veto,but only if Cain is still in as president. That is why I think a general election would be better,It would gave the people the right to say yes no.And I think it would control congress from spending more money than they get in.Nice to have a nice person to talk too,
Report Post »lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:59amWhile it is a valid concern … the President will NEVER raise the sales tax because they would be end of his Presidency for re-election or for his/her party because it would affect EVERYONE.
Report Post »mydogtippy
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 3:27pmlifelinz: you are right, but I just trust any of them anymore.nice talking to yougoing back to my game now,maybe can can talk again on something else on the blaze,again in the furture.
Report Post »million
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:43amThere is one constant in every witch’s brew. The eye of a Newt. Obama & Newt are on the same team. If you don’t beleive it take five minutes to see for yourself. You’ll be glad you did.
http://vimeo.com/6445068
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:01amSays it all… Will the real Gingrich please stand up?
Report Post »Gcopp6
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 11:49amThis is extremely informative for someone of my age which is 41. I find this to be factually correct and well presented. THIS IS A MUST WATCH for anyone CONSIDERING a vote for GINGRICH. It has really effected my thoughts. Thanks
Report Post »Bozi
Posted on November 28, 2011 at 12:46amThanks for sharing…insightful.
Report Post »lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:43amHe also nets Bill Clinton’s ringing endorsement. Yikes! What does that tell you?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/26/bill_clinton_praises_newt_hes_articulate_and_attracts_independents.html
Report Post »Tear Em Up
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:45amI like the Speaker, just not for our president…..
http://traffic.libsyn.com/mikeleeandterrymartin/Number_91_Nov._26th._2011.mp3
Report Post »conservativeinnewhampshire
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:29amThe Manchester Union Leader is the newspaper….its a great conservative newspaper, with a daily prayer and a daily laugh printed on the front page!!!!
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:46amThis is a non story – this paper is in Libral Yankee land. Promote that Progreesive left leaning stance. I cringe when I think of Newts baggage and him setting with nancy telling us there is a global warming issue. Rommny is in the same catagory. I remember all the snow last winter and flooding and just heard that heating oil is gonna be $4.00 a gallon.
Report Post »I Love Freedom
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 3:47pmWho cares who they endorse. If anybody goes for what the say are the same types who would go for Cain, then Newt, and love to get pulled by te nose by msm. Weak minded sheeple
Report Post »sbenard
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:28amI will never, Never, NEVER vote for Gingrich. Did I forget to say NEVER? Any other Republican, but NEVER Gringrich! His stance on global warming (he’s in favor), immigration, mandates in Obamacare (he endorsed them at one time), etc. are NOT harmonious with Republican principles. And I didn’t even mention his endorsement of Dede Scozzafava, which was INexcusable! He’s not Republican, and he’s absolutely no conservative!
Report Post »Have these people so quickly forgotten that Gingrich was demonized — successfully — by Clinton, and the he resigned the Speakership because he was such a pariah in Washington? Are we thus that short-sighted that we would promote such a person and elevate them to become a nominee for a major party? Obama must be chomping at the bit for Gingrich to be the GOP nominee!
And the fact that the media establishment is endorsing him is another NAIL in the COFFIN! NEVER!
lifelinz
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:44amI never vote for him either. If he becomes the nominee – Obama will win just based on the number of people who NOT vote for Newt – me being one them.
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:45amI’m with ya. The point is to be rid of the DC establishment PERIOD
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:49amYour so right, so many forget Newt is very hated by a large population of America. Especially being an enemy of Clinton. A great deal of independents were Clintonians and will elect Obama instead of Newt, just as they hated McCain. But don’t worry, the bigoted Evangelicals are going to make sure they screw with the vote, just as they did last election, giving us McCain. I guess they want to flex their morale muscle in Iowa, letting America know, they are most certainly bigoted. Good Job, again, Iowa evangelicals.
Report Post »Newt is a professional politician period. Let’s see, he cheated on his wife, just as McCain had left his wife and cheated on her. Mean while, back at the Romney home, his wife is diagnosed with MS and he takes off work for an entire year to take care of her and the kids, so she can rest. Oh, but a particular sect of Christians have more in common with those who cheat on their wives ??? what ?? Romney changes his position as it evolves and he learns more, but has strong moral integrity. Newt claims he cheated on his wife for his love for the nation. He was so dedicated to the country that he had to bight the bullet and do the nasty deed of cheating on his wife for the nations sake. You go people, you vote for Newt, just like McCain, and you try to convince me that the candidate who is bought off and has to make pay backs his first 4 years is one loyal to his wife and family. Yeah, that’s about as screwy as it gets. Obama wins, blame it on yourselves
welloddyfriggindah
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:28am“A lot of candidates say they’re going to improve Washington,” it said. “Newt Gingrich has actually done that, and in this race he offers the best shot of doing it again.”
I’m not a fan of Mr. Gingrich, but I am impressed by his command in the debates. He really did make welfare reform happen. It’s been ruined again since, but he comes the closest to handling the debates, the opposition’s diversions, the media ( who are ‘one’ with the opposition). Newt ain’t cute…. But he’s NOT an empty suit.
Report Post »ares338
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:24amHe is not my choice for sure but it’s become apparent that the Old Guard Republicans want him in. I will throw my vote behind anyone running against our present Disaster in Grief!
Report Post »AmazingGrace8
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:38amTrust but verify and his political career has ups and downs but my ears did perk up when he said he looks at the future for his grandchildren and I think he has matured (like the rest of us as we age) and will be more thoughtful about the future of America. God bless America.
Report Post »StrangernFiction
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:53amThe Old Guard wants Romney.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:23amKnowing that their chances of propagandizing Romney into office are slipping, the progressives are settling on Gingrich, Mr. CFR/NAFTA.
Report Post »Gingrich has a proven record of being a fake conservative. Look at his activities surrounding the New York, U.S. House District 23 race. He’s a fraud, and he will give amnesty to the millions of illegal aliens now in this country… just like the other fake, McCain, tried to do.
Stuck_in_CA
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:27amSenator Jim DeMint………WHERE ARE YOU??? Your country NEEDS you as POTUS
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:34amsmackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:23am
Knowing that their chances of propagandizing Romney into office are slipping, the progressives are settling on Gingrich, Mr. CFR/NAFTA.
=====================================================
Speaking of NAFTA….
Listen to what Newt tells a caller on a radio show:
“Gingrich: NAFTA Worked Because It Created Jobs In Mexico”
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3GcnHe9wDY
smackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:50amThat youtube video is proof that Gingrich does not see America as unique, but rather just another house in the local neighborhood of the world, CFR. In this view, it is acceptable for manufacturing jobs to leave America, as long as they remain in America’s neighborhood. Mexicans and Canadians are equal to Americans in consideration, after all, they are all part of the FTAA… the end goal.
Report Post »Newt Gingrich, by any other name, is a traitor to America and its status as a sovereign nation.
Ssenkrad
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:19amI‘m glad that some people aren’t blinded by Newt’s…. Newt’s… uh… I‘m exactly sure WHY some people think he’s a good choice, but I‘m glad to see that some people know he’s just a progressive like the rest. If I may add something:
http://www.hithimagain.com/2011/11/13/newt-gingrichs-voting-record-cant-compare-to-ron-pauls/
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:20amLove, love, love this!!! Go Newt! (He nails the serial adulterer vote.)
Report Post »Ssenkrad
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:16amThat’s a very important segment of the voting population, dontcha know?!
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:21pmHell he ought to get all the democrat vote then. We know how you libs love you some Bill Clinton. I do believe Newt unlike Clinton admitted his mistakes and repented unlike our “first black President”.
Report Post »Ssenkrad
Posted on November 29, 2011 at 8:10amYou’re right, Drat. Considering that Newt is an obvious big-government progressive, it’s hard to believe that liberals, democrats, marxists, and communists of all stripes aren’t flocking to him.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:20amIm not sure anybody can dismantle our socialist welfare state, without riots in the streets…. But thats what needs to be done. I pledge my vote to anybody but Obama !!!
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:18amGee….I can’t imagine why an east coast newspaper would endorse Gingrich:
“Gingrich Made Big Bucks Pushing Corporate Welfare
Timothy P. Carney Senior Political Columnist
November 16, 2011 at4:58pm
Newt Gingrich spent the last decade being paid by big business to convince conservatives to support big-government policies that would profit his clients.
Gingrich’s consulting firm racked up $1.6 million in fees from the government-sponsored enterprise Freddie Mac, we learned this week from Bloomberg News. Gingrich’s job was to help Freddie Mac win over conservatives to this market-distorting, bubble-fueling, housing-subsidy entity, which is now officially owned by the federal government.
We also know that Growth Energy, an ethanol lobby, paid $312,500 to the Gingrich Group in 2009, according to the group’s tax filing. Growth Energy lobbies to preserve many ethanol subsidies and create new ones. Gingrich has consistently supported ethanol subsidies, despite his professed allegiance to the free market.”
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/gingrich-made-big-bucks-pushing-corporate-welfare
Makes you wonder what the Union Leader stands to gain from endorsing Gingrich, doesn’t it?…
Perhaps some corporate welfare reciprocation somewhere down the line?..
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:29amThe major thing your comments make me wonder about is what your motives are.
Report Post »welloddyfriggindah
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:36amMe too, Grayling. If Mr. Obama wins – the floodgates open and we find out just how little our Constitution means to a Global Econimic movement.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:53amwelloddyfriggindah
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:36am
Me too, Grayling. If Mr. Obama wins – the floodgates open and we find out just how little our Constitution means to a Global Econimic movement.
====================================================
Yeah, right!:
“Gingrich has been openly contemptuous of American sovereignty when it comes to trade. He said, in testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee in June 1994, “I am just saying that we need to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States at a practical level significant authority to a new organization. This is a transformational moment. I would feel better if the people who favor this would just be honest about the scale of change.”
“This is very close to Maastricht [a key European Union treaty], and twenty years from now we will look back on this as a very important defining moment. This is not just another trade agreement. This is adopting something which twice, once in the 1940s and once in the 1950s, the U.S. Congress rejected. I am not even saying we should reject it; I, in fact, lean toward it.”
Report Post »http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=371329
Detroit paperboy
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 1:14pm@ commonsense
Report Post »Early morning !!! Free press , the news was afternoon and i had too much fun after school to be a afternoon paperboy ; ))
grayling646
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 3:24pm@ kid. All these sources you keep referencing may be correct or maybe they’re just people who dislike Newt. Why would I waste my time reading/watching them? They represent one man’s opinion. That’s all. If I wanted, I could find sources that debunk your sources. So what?
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:15amI‘m so confused about who to vote for in the Republican primary this time around that I’ve decided to vote for my dog, Red. He‘s running on the ’No Neuter’ ticket. 98% of all dogs and cats which haven’t been neutered or spayed support him. Is that racist? The ones who have been neutered/spayed really don‘t care and most won’t even vote. They just lay around eating and licking themselves. Some dogs and cats just simply don’t care.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:23am@ grayling646
Report Post »Do you why those dogs lick themselves all day ? ….. Cuz they cant make a fist ; ))
Gorp
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:33amGingrich is anti-gun and Second Amendment but talks pro when with gun owners.
Pelosi and Gingrich had an ad back in the late 90′s saying Global Warming was man made.
Gingrich says he doesn’t want amnesty but wants illegals to be allowed to stay here with their families.
Romney flip flops whenever he gets the chance.
I hate to burst anybody’s bubble but Ron Paul, who I do like, will never get elected.
Michelle Bachman is the only true conservative in the bunch. She says what she means and means what she says. The GOP will never nominate her because she is too conservative for them. They want somebody who’s more “moderate” and will do their bidding and go along to get along. That’s NOT Michelle! This is the first time in my life I am going to the caucuses in the hopes of getting her nominated and get this country back on track.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:39amGrayling, before Red gets my dog, Spot’s, vote you’ll have to answer a few questions. How did Red come to get his name, Red? A communist sympathizer? And, how does Red feel about government subsidized neutering/spaying? Are dogs permitted to cross Spot‘s fence in order to relax and eat in Spot’s yard? Does Red support the National Association for the Advancement of Colored Puppies (NAACP) organization? How about the Anti-Defecation League (ADL)? Or the Anti-Canine Leash Union (ACLU)? … need to know.
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 2:34pm@ smackdown
Big Red “Red” is a purebred, registered British Labrador Retriever with a fox red coat (the original color, btw). Hence, his name. Red believes in paying your own way. About any subsidies Red says, “The Federal Government would screw up a junkyard dog”. Red lives in the house and has a large fenced in yard for exercise and relaxation.This keeps neighbor’s neighborly and young unwed females from getting pregnant. It also prevents him from getting squished on the highway. Red fully supports the NAACP and the ADL. He says the ACLU can “sleep outside with the cats”.
**********BIG RED IN 2012**********
Report Post »Barack Must Go
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 9:13am“ BOOM ” goes the Obama socialist regime dynamite……..again.
Face it libs, Barack is going to be Newt’s bitch for the next year…….then he and his fellow grifter in OUR, not their White House will be exiled back to Hawaii……nod, nod, wink, wink.
Al akh Roseann bar
Report Post »Ssenkrad
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 10:49amI would just pack up and move to a remote island in the Pacific if Newt gets the nomination. He’s a big government progressive, and it’s painfully obvious at that:
http://www.hithimagain.com/2011/11/13/newt-gingrichs-voting-record-cant-compare-to-ron-pauls/
Look at Newt’s voting record. Yep, this is the man we want to run against Obama.
If you want to save America, there is only two words that you need to know: Ron Paul.
Report Post »whywonder
Posted on November 27, 2011 at 12:34pmMust go
Report Post »You are stupid
Ssenkrad
Posted on November 29, 2011 at 8:13am@Why I don’t know why, but you netted a chuckle out of me. Maybe because it’s true.
Report Post »