Hairstylist Refuses to Cut New Mexico Governor’s Hair Over Stance on Gay Marriage
- Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:45am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »

New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez addresses a joint session of the House and Senate at the start of the legislative session in Santa Fe, N.M., on Tuesday, Jan. 17, 2012. (AP Photo/Susan Montoya Bryan)
Governor Susana Martinez has lost a hair stylist thanks to her position against gay marriage.
Antonio Darden, a popular stylist who runs Antonio’s Hair Studio in Santa Fe, said he cut Martinez’ hair three times, but that’s it – unless she changes her mind about gay marriage.
“The governor’s aides called not too long ago, wanting another appointment to come in,” Darden said. “Because of her stances and her views on this I told her aides no. They called the next day, asking if I’d changed my mind about taking the governor in and I said no again.”
The governor has said she believes marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that does not cut it with Darden.
“I think it’s just equality, dignity for everyone,” the popular hair stylist said. “I think everybody should be allowed the right to be together. My partner and I have been together for 15 years.”





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (144)
donaldchar
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:33amShe won’t have to look far for another good hair stylist. She doesn’t need to patronize a fool who favors anybody having sex with anybody. Bravo, Gov! Only good thing about their relationship is that they’ll never produce offspring by sodomizing. Yuck.
Report Post »IndyGuy
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:47amFunny how the gay community spouts tolerance while at the same time show total lack of such…
Report Post »Santafeconservative
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:50amAs a Santa Fe resident myself, I see first-hand the rigid “if you‘re not with us you’re against us” attitude among the Left here. I‘ve had gay friends who told me that they won’t be my friend anymore because I’m indifferent about the gay marriage issue. One Thanksgiving I had a dinner planned but one person said he decided that he wouldn’t come because his gratitude was around the Democratic win (this was 2008) and he knew that I would be seething. With his departure everyone else cancelled as well. At another dinner party a guest stood up and said, “George Bush is a a-hole and I’m leaving.” The only reason why she didn’t go far was because her husband had the keys to the car, so she sat on the sofa and sulked the rest of the evening (and all this happened BEFORE I woke up politically). On a walk in my neighborhood a couple of months ago I welcomed a new neighbor. As we stood at the end of the driveway and chatted, he told me that all Republicans are racist. Santa Fe is a screwed up town. I’m not one bit surprised about this hair stylist. Too bad. I’ve been looking for a new stylist myself. Scratch him off my list.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:37amI am as anti gay marriage as you can get, but I support the hair dressers option not to cut based on beliefs.
It would be interesting if we turned the tables though. If a restaurant turned down a bunch of gays and lesbians from having a group lunch, what would the MSM say.
I can tell you this, if I go to get my hair cut, and the person doing the cutting talks queer, I head out the door. I get to decide where I spend my money.
Report Post »mwhaley
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:00amAh…the tolerant, open minded, coexist, lets all get along left. Until one has his own opinions.
Report Post »Docrow
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:12amspot on RANGERP!
Report Post »fangbanger
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:29amgood for both of them. freedom of speech is a wonderful thing
Report Post »StonyBurk
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:51amMy brother lost a hair stylist in the Republic Of Vietnam over his comments about not trusting the local guy. shortly after that that local guy was found among the dead apparently he had led Victor Charles into camp. I see some similarity here. And agree she don’t need a Sodomite Hairstylist.
Report Post »mils
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:55amIt is her right to take a stand…
Report Post »…@Santafeconservative….Sounds like you need a new group of friends.
Walkabout
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:10amThe hair stylist has a right to refuse service. We have a right not to patronize her business.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:52amIt‘s the hairdresser’s prerogative as a business person to deny service to anyone. I think he’s an idiot…but I support his exercise of his right as a business owner. I’m sure Gov. Martinez can find a suitable replacement. You see unlike the militant homosexual lobby…I‘m fine with a business owner taking a position on the issue and don’t need to mount an internet campaign to destroy the business owner. Homosexuals on the other hand have demonstrated time and again that they’re spiteful and willing to destroy the business.
Report Post »satostud
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:53pmGood for her. It is time to make a stand for God, before it become illegal in the U.S. to do so.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:00pmThanks anyway. Who want’s a queer hair cut?
Report Post »Parnell3rd
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:08pmexactly Indyguy
Report Post »Zod Cranards
Posted on April 1, 2012 at 12:06pmHere Here!!!
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges12
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:26am“Hairstylist Refuses to Cut New Mexico Governor’s Hair Over Stance on Gay Marriage”
Bravo for you!
You know, AIDS (also known as HAIDS – Homosexual Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome – now politically “scrubbed” out of the language), the homosexual disease, originally traced back to a identified monkey, lets you know how sick, twisted, and perverse these fägs really are. And it’s contagious, too. You probably saved your life!
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges12
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:29am“Bravo for you” — for the state governor.
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges12
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:34amBut Glenn would like to make an appointments for him and his whole staff.
Report Post »( ♥♥ They’re just kissy-kissy over da girly-mans. ♥♥ )
AverageDude
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:43amAIDS actually means anally injected death sentance haha
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:12amBusinesses should should stick to providing the products and services they advertise. If this hairdresser wants advertise or post a sign that he will not do business with people that don‘t support his gay agenda that’s fine with me. But my guess is he’ll be out of business before he knows it.
Report Post »nelbert
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:16amDoes seem to be a no-win position from the hairdresser’s position. If he doesn’t cut her hair, I’m sure there are plenty of competitors who will jump at the chance.
Report Post »anotherplanet
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:08amMy, My another example of a brave patriot standing up for a non-right. How gutsy of him…..
Report Post »trappedinwv
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:47amOk, so what part of the headline confused those who are bashing the blaze for posting the story?
Don’t like, Don’t click
Report Post »momsense
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:38amI guess blackmail is ok if you’re gay!
Report Post »Theodwulf
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:33amIf someone refused to cut a gay persons hair…can you imagine the outcry?
Report Post »Latter-Day-Soldier
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:43amLike the cake decorator who refused to make a wedding cake for a lesbian couple?
Report Post »http://www.theblaze.com/stories/lesbian-couple-may-sue-christian-baker-who-refused-to-make-their-wedding-cake/
txbigfoot
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:44amwell said.
Report Post »Such a double standard its not funny.
ldaopines
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:26amThere are plenty of people who can cut hair who favor equal rights to individual thought, free speech, and family values.
If conservatives shut off services/goods to progressives, they would be completely incapacitated. Maybe that’s what we need to do??
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:17amDarden… alike other Radicals… just cannot figure out how Capitalism functions!
Report Post »USAF_Vet
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:16am“Civil Unions” are meant for people who desire recognition, typically centered around financial reasons or for some semblance of societal acceptance. Although I am completely against the concept of homosexuality (not the persons involved), I suppose there is a place in society for Civil Unions. That being said, “Marriage” is an institution that is meant to be between and man and a woman ONLY, before their Creator, God. If the homosexuals in question are God-fearing folk, they would NOT flaunt their lifestyle before God. If they are non-believers, then they do not care what our Creator thinks or says regarding their lifestyle. In short, Civil Unions are for non-believers; Marriage is for believers.
Report Post »momsense
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:41amHave never understood why they want to call it marriage, its not.They can‘t make kids with each other and that’s part of the traditional marriage.
Report Post »NeoKong
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:56amPull his license.
Report Post »You cannot refuse service because you don‘t like somebody’s politics.
What would happen to any barber who said ” we don’t serve gay people here”…?
ugottabekidding
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:23amHis business. You’re a commie.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 7:21amYou can refuse to serve who ever you want, for whatever reason. Freedom.
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:09amYes, you can! Ever see the signs in a store that said “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone”
Private business, their rules.
Report Post »VinnieCCT
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:37pmActually, with the new so-called civil rights movement, the only person you can get away with refusing service to is a white male conservative Christian. Try refusing service to anyone else and prepare for a lawsuit.
Report Post »nocalifornia
Posted on February 24, 2012 at 9:21amto Ugottabekidding
Report Post »So what you are saying is “I have the right to refuse service to anyone” including gays, blacks, atheists, socialists, liberals, and democrats as long as I own the business? How long would it take the ACLU and the lame stream media to crucify me for that little bit of free speech?
VoteRightDammit
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:21amACLU!
Stand up and show us you are not communist shills!
Go after this bigoted individual for discrimination and violation of civil rights!
Come on, ACLU! Cowboy up!
Report Post »Brooke Lorren
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:13amI think that he should have the right to refuse a customer.
I personally wouldn’t want anybody cutting my hair if they had hostility towards me. They might just mess it up big time “accidentally” on purpose.
Then again, I cut my own hair.
Report Post »nzkiwi
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:29amAnd the florist won’t deliver flowers to the young atheist.
If people are happy to use their businesses as a political tool, the business climate can’t be all that bad in the USA.
On the other hand; principles are principles, I suppose.
Report Post »str8blues
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:01amHostility? What about his hostility toward her beliefs? So he’s going to force his alternative lifestyle on her religious beliefs? She’s not against his union with his partner. MARRIAGE is between a man and a woman. Perhaps the hairstylist shouldn‘t be so hostile to most other American’s beliefs. There are other hair stylist out there. In every strip mall in the state……I‘m sure this won’t set Susana back for too long. This guy is nothing special. Someone is hostile to someone elses beliefs and it isn’t the Governor.
Report Post »9635kari
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:09amMaybe it is time for decent citizens to not patronize his salon. I am so fed up with these homosexuals pushing their lifestyles on Americans. They are a small minority and yet they want to have it all. Sorry.
Report Post »Latter-Day-Soldier
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:56amIn Iraq, we had hair salons on every base that wasn’t a “micro-F.O.B.” and on one base I was stationed at, there were openly gay males employed there. Myself and a few other soldiers would specifically request to have a female cut our hair because some of us were VERY uncomfortable with a gay male putting his hands anywhere on our bodies.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:07am“I think it’s just equality, dignity for everyone.”
So show me the “dignity” in being a sexual pervert?
The glorified barber has a right to refuse service to anyone. But if the shoe was on the other foot and a barber refused service to a sexual pervert, there would be law suits and a media storm.
Better to get your hair done by someone who‘s hands you don’t have to wonder about where they have been anyway…………..
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:42amThe hair dresser has a right to be with a partner. Just stop trying to highjack marriage. Whats with the gay fettish for changing the meaning of words?
Report Post »db321
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:53amI’m now convinced – The Blaze was bought out by the National Inquirer!
Report Post »burnteye86
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:39amWhen Antonio “the stylist” talks about equality for everyone, he doesn’t mean styling hair for everyone no matter their political views, right? Just trying to understand his logic.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:37amI‘ll bet the governor isn’t shedding any crocodile tears over this and neither will I.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:23amAnd Antonio Darden has that right,and people have a right to boycott him.
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:20amOne more reason why this MAN cuts his own hair nowadays. The days of the manly barber shop are gone and personally I don‘t like spitting out 40 bucks for a ’do and I just buzz it to an inch and that’s that. 500 plus a year saved that won’t end up in the Gay Gestapo coffers.
No freaking momo’s not gonna tell me MY haircut depends on my gay marriage stance. Bite me ‘Mary’ Antonio.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:53amDude, you are WRONG ! BIG TIME !
You may have to go out to the countryside, and drive around the old “downtowns,” and watch for REAL BARBER POLES.. but… the traditional barber, replete with shoe-shine stand, big heavy chairs, and 4-yr-old popular science magazines, is alive and well ! It’s just harder to find these days.
Report Post »TheObamanation
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:16amHe’s really playing hardball now
Report Post »burnteye86
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:40amheh heh
Report Post »thomas242007
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:13amWhy is this is even on here, this has to be the most irrelevant story ive ever read, well next to the yahoo story about the shark fin soup, the stories on here are getting worste, he blaze writers you need to do more hard hitting stories, like acorn, iran, black panthers, cair, any number of those things and leave this boring crap out of the page PLEASE
Report Post »Brooke Lorren
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:11amI’m personally more interested in Iran and the “hard” news stories myself.
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:02amThe moral-phobic stylist has a right to refuse to do the hair,however you could bet your life savings the stylist would sue if the Governor had stopped going because of his Immoral ways. She would be crucified by the media and branded as homophobic!. what a bunch of Hypocrites!
Report Post »Lakewoodbob
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:01amI believe the Governor has a civil rights case of discrimination against the Hair Stylist. Do gays have a right to discriminate , but others don’t? Sounds one-way to me!
“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” – William F. Buckley:
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:11amActually you’re incorrect. If a business is private, meaning they receive no public (or tax payer) monies, they can do as they wish.
Do you think it’s the right of a Kosher Deli to not serve someone a ham sandwich if they order one? It is their right to have their own rules.
Report Post »jungle J
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:47amonly the sane can understand why the stylist is…….irrelevant as a human.
Report Post »