Have You Ever Seen a Mutant Cyclops Shark?
- Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:32am by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
This creature almost doesn’t seem real with its single, giant eye, bulbous head and oddly pale coloration.
Believe it or not, it’s actually a very common species of bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas, with a mutant twist. The mutation is called cyclopia and can occur in humans and other animals, although extremely rare in all species.

A side angle comparison of the mutant version and normal version of the species. (Photo: Enrique Lucero León)
According to National Geographic, a dead female bull shark carrying nine fetuses was caught earlier this year by a fisherman off the coast of Mexico. The fetuses eyes’, although they were dead, remained in tact in the womb giving researchers the chance for a good look.
National Geographic quotes University of Northern Florida as saying that cyclops sharks have been found before as embryos:
The fact that none have been caught outside the womb suggests cyclops sharks don’t survive long in the wild.
Overall, finding such an unusual animal reinforces that scientists still have a lot to learn, Gelsleichter added.
“It‘s a humbling experience to realize you ain’t seen it all yet.”


























Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (90)
PApeacemaker
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:45amI bet its Blinky’s brother & it was caught in Springfield by one of the Simpson family lol
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 12:51pmKill it Quinn, Kill it!
Report Post »shogun459
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 1:23pmSooo, fried or grilled.
yum
Report Post »Zer0
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 4:09pmKill it with FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Black Manta
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 4:14pmWow people do and believe anything to get attention….
Report Post »Isaiah51
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:43pmGooglybear
Report Post »justlistentome
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:44amSo, do the live ones have tunnel vision??
Report Post »Pontiac
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:06am“tunnel vision”
Uh no… Cover one of your eyes. That’s not tunnel vision.
I wanna hurl after seeing those pics…
Report Post »bum
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 2:40pmyou mean no depth perception
Report Post »4xeverything
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:20pmSharks eyes are on the sides of their heads…meaning that they don’t have depth perception like humans. Our eyes both focus in on an object together, and use shadows for a more refined perception of what the object is, what it is doing, and how far away it is from us. That cyclops shark (if it is not blind) only has to deal with being able to see from the front only instead of from both sides of it’s head simultaneously, but since it is a Bull shark I don’t think it has to many predators other than man anyway.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:27amAre there any cyclopic politicians? :)
Report Post »countryfirst
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:18amIt’s a white fish that stands out among the group and only has one eye, how could it possibly survive without government assistance.
Report Post »Ferrarello
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:16amPoor guy . ( Cyclops)
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:03amSome lawyer lost his kid!!!
Report Post »Man-bearpigdogs
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:54amJust can’t stop laughing!
Report Post »Evil_Conservative
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:01amStrangely i think of Austin Powers 2 – “come on down and see the one eyed monster” “that looks like a ….”
Report Post »GA_dandelion
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:53amThank you Blaze…nice break
Report Post »Zoe
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:44amGee Darwin, am I supposed to have one eye in my forehead? I’m feeling rather advanced!
Report Post »autigers2010champs
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:35amWhat the HELL?? That is crazy looking how cool had it lived and been raised. He is the reason I don’t swim in the ocean.
Report Post »MOLLYPITCHER
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:34amWhat the hell? Has the Blaze turned into the National Inquirer?
Report Post »obama-mecca-me-sick
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 5:45pmOr National Geographic???
Report Post »Darren
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:07amHope nobody blames globalwarming.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:39amI sure hope no believes this story. It’s so obviously a fake that only a true idiot could believe it. Just like AGW
Report Post »Homeschooled
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:01amI’m sorry Smithclar3nc3, how is this faked exactly? I’m pretty sure the blaze only puts up true stories. I am also positive that, that is a real shark and that can really happen.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:23amLook at the the photos dumba55. You can even see where the fake eye socket is pulling from the mold.
Report Post »Charybdis
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 12:00pmWell, to be fair, this isn’t a Blaze-generated story, but a link from a National Geographic article. So if it’s fake, then it fooled them as well. Not that that hasn’t happened before with them. The Archaeoraptor hoax from China several years back comes to mind. So take it with a grain of salt I guess. Only this critter was apparently available for soft-tissue study, unlike the so-called Archaeorapter. So I tend to think it’s very real.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 12:44pmHey char,you need to read more carefully NATIONAL GEO. never touched this supposed creature. So your claim enspoucing the had soft tissue is unsubstantiated.They did claim to have found one eye shark fetuses in a dead Bull shark. This one was supposedly caught alive.
Report Post »Charybdis
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 1:43pmNo, you misinterpreted what I said. I didn’t claim NG actually performed a soft-tissue study. Only that, unlike Archeaorapter (which was presumably a fossil), this was a creature photographed as a soft-tissue specimen. And the NG apparently decided that the discovery was real enough to write an article about, noting that this type of mutation has been shown to occur in a number of different species. So if you have an issue with it’s legitimacy, your beef should be with NG as a professional organization, rather than with the Blaze or those who take the find at face value.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 3:13pmChar,
Report Post »Take the words of one of greatest Founding Father apply them in your everyday life.
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
Point being just because a website you like prints something doesn’t always make it a FACT
Charybdis
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:09pmActually, I do live my life that way. This latest fish could indeed be found to be a hoax. Fine, whatever. But since there is a scientifically verified precedent for such a mutation, it’s not outside the realm of possibility.
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 12:03amI’ve never seen anything like it before, therefore is fake. I even looked up cyclopia online AND in my encyclopedia set. Although there are several references, I have never PERSONALLY experienced it, so, it does not exist.
My logic is FLAWLESS!
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 12:06amYou quote the founders yet you take the very left-wing, progressive, pseudo-intellectual stance of, “If it has not been discovered by our God ~SCIENCE~ then it does not exist.”
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 6:16amI think it‘s an October fool’s day joke
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:45amAwesome. haha.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:45amWhat, no wooden shoe?
“Wynken and Blynken are two little eyes,
— And Nod is a little head,
And the wooden shoe that sailed the skies
— Is a wee one’s trundle-bed;
So shut your eyes while Mother sings
— Of wonderful sights that be,
And you shall see the beautiful things
— As you rock in the misty sea
Where the old shoe rocked the fishermen three:—
——– Wynken,
——– Blynken,
——– And Nod.”
So, was this Wynken or Blynken?
Report Post »ZengaPA65
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:31amWilly the one eyed wonder shark!
Report Post »BrandyWilson
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:40amIt was a one-eyed…one-finned…swimming….white-people-eater!…..Freaky as all get out!
Report Post »oohisis
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:21amlol…as I was scrolling down reading the comments, I started humming that song!!!
Report Post »Locksmith
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:19am@SNOW: you mean “UNcommon sense”, right? ;)
Report Post »Harryc123
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:13am9 fetuses in the womb of a dead mother? Obviously the republicans fault. They want this to happen.
Report Post »Discord
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:12amOld news is really old.
Report Post »quicker
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:04amOH MY GOD, it`s Obamas adviser.
Report Post »piper60
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:27amOn economics, no doubt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »TwoLazy
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:50amThe head shape looks suspiciously like that of a whale …. Hummm … could there have been some hanky panky there?
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:49amI think I see a DISNEY film in his future! How adorable and lovable is he? Kids would love a feel good story about acceptance using this little guy!
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:37amOnly if HeeeeEEeee SpeeEeeEeaks WhaaaaAAAaaale and has a “lucky eye”.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:10amDid that sound a bit orca-ish?
Report Post »Indymaverick
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:34amI see a marketing opportunity here. Willy the one eyed shark stuffed animals and toys !!
Report Post »FeliciaJewel
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:49amMy great uncle said to me once, the day you realize that you don’t know it all is the day you become intelligent. This just proves I have not seen it all or heard it all. Waiting for tomorrow to see what I will learn!!!
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:02amYour great uncle indeed demonstrated wisdom; and common sense.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:45amThe first thing that popped into my mind was ‘Futurama’!
Report Post »Secessionista
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:16amLela is SO HOT!
But let’s not forget the radioactive fish in the nuclear cooling pond from the Simpsons.
Report Post »RichNGadsden
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:22amYeah, Blinky!
Report Post »niki
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:41amHe’s so cute. I wish they had let him live.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:39am.
Report Post »BP did you do that?…………
Gzeee1969
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:36amDo you have to ask….
Report Post »Phantom II
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:58amGeorge Bush just doesn’t quit, does he?
Report Post »