Technology

Having it Both Ways? White House Now Pushing Privacy Bill of Rights

Earlier today, The Blaze highlighted a Daily Caller story which reported that the Feds are ordering school principals to monitor the Facebook activities of their students after-hours in order to, essentially, guard against online bullying and harassment. In light of that, we offer you another report which stands in contrast to the first story: the White House is pushing Congress to pass a “privacy bill of rights.”

Having it Both Ways? White House Now Pushing Privacy Bill of Rights

The Wall Street Journal reports:

The Obama administration plans to ask Congress Wednesday to pass a “privacy bill of rights” to protect Americans from intrusive data gathering, amid growing concern about the tracking and targeting of Internet users.
This person said the administration will back a law that follows the outlines of a report issued by the Commerce Department in December. The administration wants any new rules to be enforceable and will look to expand the Federal Trade Commission’s authority, this person said.

If legislation is drafted based off of the December report, then that legislation will require companies to ask consumers for permission “to use personal data for a purpose other than for which it was collected.”

Right now, many companies do not do that. Specifically, popular websites install information tracking technologies on an individual’s computer, ”feeding an industry that gathers and sells information on their finances, political leanings and religious interests, among other things,” the Journal reports.

For a sense of how exposed internet users are as a result of those information tracking technologies, read this Journal report from last week. Here’s a teaser:

Data-gathering firms and technology companies are aggressively matching people’s TV-viewing behavior with other personal data—in some cases, prescription-drug records obtained from insurers—and using it to help advertisers buy ads targeted to shows watched by certain kinds of people.

So how does this “privacy bill of rights” square away with the Daily Caller’s report about principals snooping on their students? It seems like the feds want it both ways: you can violate someone’s privacy in the name of sensitivity, but you cannot violate someone’s privacy in the name of commerce.

Comments (76)

  • Liberalsarealiens
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:35pm

    Big Brother is alive and well! We MUST remove these socialist next year!

    Also, The Obama adminisration has stopped paying some VA benitits to private schools but will pay for the same education for public universities. Look it up! The Yellow Ribbon portion of the Post 9-11 GI Bill. Crying shame these socialist are slowly taking over this country and doing it quietly so no one will see it! 2012 is the year this country returns to it’s glory!

    Report Post »  
  • AmeriCat
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:31pm

    Isn’t that what Dictators do?

    Somehow, Obama didn’t have to learn any of this.
    He began his Reign of Control on Day 1, Inauguration Day;
    but, actually well before, when one considers the “media.”

    Report Post »  
  • SC Now
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:17pm

    Don’t monitor or pass a “biil of rights.” Leave us alone!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Report Post »  
  • inexiletill2012
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:06pm

    Fed guidelines:
    Must report : Tea Party Activity

    Report Post » inexiletill2012  
  • dadsrootbeer
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:59pm

    Say one thing do another is the mantra of this Chicago style adminstration

    Report Post » dadsrootbeer  
  • wash1776
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:55pm

    It never ceases to amaze me what Obama and his crew can come up with to exercise more control over EVERYTHING. Just trying to control the kids so they grow up into good little commies.

    Report Post »  
  • RightPolitically
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:53pm

    Believe NOTHING coming out of this White House.

    Report Post » RightPolitically  
    • firstlast
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 7:09pm

      Believe NOTHING until you see the proof.

      “I think everything is a trap; that’s why Im still alive”
      -Prince Humperdink

      Report Post »  
  • chrish
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:39pm

    The corrupt administration , has stopped listening to the American people along time ago. The last thing that Obama did I think was play some golf last weekend. He doesn`t care about the American people. Just remember They the socialists, George Soros etc….. have awaked a sleeping giant us the American people.

    Report Post »  
    • Eblaze44
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 7:11pm

      Corrupt administration? how about a corrupt government? beware – communism is coming.

      Report Post » Eblaze44  
  • REVENANT
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:36pm

    This isn’t about privacy at all. This is ab out choking commerce. Commerce depends on connecting with potential customers. This will severely inhibit that. When it comes to the Feds snooping on us, Obama’s powers are becoming limitless.

    Report Post » REVENANT  
  • fertlmind
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:36pm

    Dear Beware of Romans,

    1. What does your post have to do with the story ‘White House Now Pushing Privacy Bill of Rights’ ?
    2. Your post isn’t funny, pithy, or even making an attempt to be entertaining
    3. Are you insane?
    4. The Roman Catholics killed JFK?
    5. Are you insane?
    (sorry, I thought it important to ask that question twice!)

    Can’t you find a nice Union Blog to crap upon?

    Report Post » fertlmind  
  • Mannax
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:33pm

    You are probably right, Hawt. I generally only post to trolls. *sighs* Should fix that.

    Report Post »  
  • Randyrocker
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:32pm

    Privacy on who’s say so? What a line of bull these maggots are stinging us. Don’t fall for their hitlerian form of entrapment, and accept their words as gospel for they are neither, and they are working against your interests not for them.

    Report Post »  
  • drbage
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:32pm

    So, the hard working school administrators are supposed to monitor after school activities of students enrolled in their schools. Did the government slip through a new law declaring that everyone under the age of 18 is an orphan and is to be considered a ward of the state?

    Report Post »  
    • tuppenceworth
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:29pm

      Anyone considering how school administration members will be compensated for the extra time involved here? If I am not mistaken, there seems to be a variety of budget issues facing every community these days, largely due to highly paid educational providers. Now we will have them “baby-sit” too? How will that effect their contracts and compensation? Is that the intention? To convince us that since they are the ones “PRIMARILY” watching over our kids they are entitled to more say and more $$$. Scary.

      Report Post »  
    • mike1029
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 6:15pm

      Oh, administrators can handle this easily: “Teachers, you are responsible for monitoring your students’ Facebook pages.”
      There! All handled.

      Report Post »  
  • jordy2010
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:32pm

    moron…..

    Report Post » jordy2010  
  • 9thCommandment
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:32pm

    Well he did say it would be easier to be Prez of China. I don’t know how much more BHO can pull before even the useful idiots start to wake up….before it is too late.

    Report Post »  
  • Redneckpatriot1776
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:31pm

    Great, now we can give more power to the FCC and the FTC to “Protect” us some more… The Federal Nanny McPhee!

    Report Post »  
  • WTH is up with our government
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:29pm

    Hey, the good news is…the unemployment rate will go down because of all the gov hiring…pretty soon we will all be snitching…I mean reporting, to Barry.

    Report Post »  
  • Sinista MACE
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:26pm

    The government thinks it can define the limits of your privacy through legislation.

    Not gonna fly with the general public.

    Report Post » V-MAN MACE  
  • 8jrts
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:26pm

    Most people sign away their rights to privacy when they check that little box “terms and conditions”. If you don’t, you can’t use our service. This bill is just for looks….watch what the other hand is doing!!!

    Report Post » 8jrts  
  • 912828Buckeye
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:25pm

    Congrats on your first…….But why did it have to be
    a C & P job not article related?

    912828Buckeye  
  • 912828Buckeye
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:22pm

    This administration has truly lost it’s mind.

    Report Post » 912828Buckeye  
  • SICKANTIRED
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:21pm

    They Just keep Taking I Say whe should give something back :-)

    Report Post » SICKANTIRED  
  • Mannax
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:20pm

    It is a shame that thread jacking isn’t against the law.

    Warning, don’t feed the trolls.. and the troll is strong with this one.

    Report Post »  
  • Showtime
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:18pm

    Sounds like typical liberal double talk to me, speaking out of both sides of their mouths.

    Report Post » Showtime  
    • Taquoshi
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:25pm

      Interesting that it‘s okay to have an abortion and one’s privacy is protected, but writing something on one’s Facebook page is not. Oddly enough, abusive cases are usually brought forward and become viral in this day and age. Can we all say Jennifer Petkov, who ended up losing custody of her kids over the Facebook harassment of a dying child. I think that if someone is being bullied, they need to report it to the site monitors and it should be handled internally. But I don’t think that the government should be dictating when, where and how one uses Facebook or any other Internet site. That’s a parenting issue, not a governmental issue.

      Report Post » Taquoshi  
    • snidley-whiplash
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:45pm

      ya know only two things i dislike about liberals…………………THEIR FACE

      Report Post » snidley-whiplash  
    • firstlast
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 6:57pm

      There’s nothing private about Facebook. You post your life and thoughts there for the whole world to see. Its not supposed to be private; its a webpage.

      Report Post »  
  • Beware of Romans
    Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:15pm

    “Control the youth…control the world”

    Adolph Hitler 1939

    Report Post » Beware of Romans  
    • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:36pm

      Privacy will only apply if you have a D after your name, or belong to the correct party. Otherwise, no soup for you.

      Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
    • 912828Buckeye
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:44pm

      Unheard of…. 2 Firsts on the same story!
      A new first……Pun intended.

      Report Post » 912828Buckeye  
    • Mannax
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 12:56pm

      Two firsts. At least the second first was not a trollish as the first first,

      Report Post »  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:05pm

      We don’t need another “Privacy Bill of Rights”. Our Constitution already prohibits government from unreasonable searches and seizures. This is just a way to subvert the Constitution’s restrictions upon government.

      Bill of Rights, Fourth Amendment

      “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

      Report Post »  
    • NeoFan
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:07pm

      Oh yes lets all vote to give the government more power. However what happens when the government is controlled by the republicans? Will all this new power be taken away?

      Report Post »  
    • Rogue
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:20pm

      Seeing as how Google has government contracts with the intellegence community, I can see them being the first to get a waiver from the new FCC regulations.

      The FCC is loving this – more oversight of anything they can construe as “data gathering”. Any site that keeps track of the visitors to it’s site would be subject to FCC review.

      Report Post » Rogue  
    • pajamash
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 1:45pm

      Government schizophrenia at its best.

      Report Post »  
    • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 2:29pm

      If Obama is for it, I am against it. We are opposites.

      Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 2:46pm

      Hey DOC.
      You’re 100% correct and this legislations demanding GOVERNMENT WORKERS spy on private citizens is just one more reason to abolish the DOE and remove the federal government from the educational or indoctrination of America’s youth. Education should be a state,local or private school issue.

      Report Post »  
    • godlovinmom
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 2:55pm

      How about abolishing the NEA…they don’t want to teach our children…they want to indoctrinate them..yet another reason I homeschool….that way my child is being educated at a local level (mine)and not by the new nazi’s …

      Report Post » godlovinmom  
    • VRW Conspirator
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 3:28pm

      I am a teacher at high school…would never do this…
      Now if you want to talk about me building a cell phone jammer that blankets the entire campus or at least my room…then I am all for it….but the government says that is illegal….
      so me jamming the signals so that i can teach without their fingers moving on keys….since administration doesn’t do much of anything if you turn the student in for using the phone in class…is illegal…
      but the government monitoring what they do in school and at home for harmful talking about another student is okay….
      gotcha….
      where am I living…this isn’t America…it isn’t even Europe…this is Russia under Stalin or Germany under HItler or China under Mao…what is next…taking the offenders off to re-education camps….

      Report Post » VRW Conspirator  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 3:46pm

      @Beware of Romans

      Exactly.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • oldoldtimer
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 3:47pm

      Labor do you really expect Obama a supposed constitutional scholor to follow the constitution? Would computer security come under effects? It is just another way of getting control of the internet one pieces at a time.

      Report Post »  
    • 1TrueOne55
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 4:29pm

      This “Education” Official is a Gay Rights Activist and has been called out by Glenn in the past as pushing a Gay agenda in schools. This Official even thinks that Gay rights groups should have access to teach Gay sensitivity to students so they don’t “Bully” Homosexual Teens…

      I also believe that he was confronted about an incident with a teenager in a school that he was at. So this should really be looked at by the Agencies in charge of oversight.

      Report Post » 1TrueOne55  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 4:46pm

      @VRW Conspirator

      Yes. And your new charismatic leader with all the answers is President Obama.

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • jzs
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 5:59pm

      You guys are the most gullible group I’ve ever seen. The Daily Caller posts a story that says the “Feds have ordered school principles to monitor Facebook.” The article is completely unsourced – it doesn’t even pretend to have a source. It just makes that statement as fact. And you believe it. Pretty pathetic.

      Why don‘t you call the principal and your kid’s school and asked if he or she has been ordered to monitor Facebook? You won’t because you know what would happen: they would laugh at the idea. The entire concept is utterly absurd.

      The school system has utterly failed with are people in the United States who have zero ability to think critically enough to believe any article on the web that agrees with their prejudices.

      Maybe we’ll get better teachers if we pay them less.

      jzs  
    • firstlast
      Posted on March 16, 2011 at 7:02pm

      Agreed JZS; this is coming from a group who believes nuclear radiation is perfectly harmless.

      Report Post »  
    • butler180
      Posted on March 17, 2011 at 1:29am

      Is this legal?

      Report Post » butler180  
    • SweetDoug
      Posted on March 17, 2011 at 9:00am

      “to use personal data for a purpose other than for which it was collected.”

      The problem is, is that if you don’t give them that right, you don’t get the priviledge of doing business with them, so they really aren’t asking. This is the word-weaseling that has taken over our culture. It sounds like they are asking, but they are telling. Make no mistake. And when this is a business that provides a necessity? What then?

      Report Post » SweetDoug  
    • SonOfaCommunist
      Posted on March 17, 2011 at 12:43pm

      The good news is that in the end, all of this will back fire on them! It always does! It just might take a while.

      Report Post » SonOfaCommunist  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In