Herman Cain Cracks Anita Hill Joke: Is She ‘Going to Endorse Me?’
- Posted on November 11, 2011 at 8:52am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
It’s no secret that Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain has had an intense couple of weeks. Following allegations that he sexually harassed numerous women, the successful businessman showed on Thursday that, despite the political drama, he still has a sense of humor.
At a meet-and-greet event in Michigan, a man in the audience brought up a well-known name in American politic scandals — Anita Hill (the woman who famously accused Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment 20 years ago).
In a video clip, the man can be heard asking Cain a question, although it is somewhat muffled. He says, “You hear the latest news today? Anita Hill is going to come…”
The rest of his words are unintelligible, but what‘s most notable is Cain’s response. After doubling over in laughter, the presidential contendor quips, “Is she going to endorse me?” (the “she” being Hill). Laughter ensued, as the audience clearly found the off-the-cuff statement entertaining to say the least.
Watch the exchange, below:
(H/T: Fox News Insider)





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (196)
In detroit
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:14amAll this hooplah and still a whole year to go , better get serious
Report Post »TroyBray
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 6:40pmOn the contrary. The press is a joke, and America knows it. The accusers are jokes, and America knows it. Obama’s policies are a joke, and America knows it. All Herman Cain has to do is have some fun, and he’s the next prez. I keep hearing people say that there is no Reagan in the race, But Reagan was simply a Conservative, who deeply loved America and believed in her greatness, and was full of optimism. Which part of that doesn’t describe Herman Cain?
Report Post »1389AD
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 8:30pmThe race card went overdrawn last year, and now the sex card has done the same.
No telling what else Axelrod will try to pull, but by now, we’ve got him scoped out pretty well.
http://1389blog.com/2011/11/10/how-david-axelrod-and-the-chicago-machine-smeared-herman-cain/
Report Post »xabw468
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:00amgo cain
Report Post »mils
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:15amWe’re wondering what is going to happen when Cain is even or a point or so ahead of mitt come the convention.
Report Post »…will Mitt still get the nod..??
Newt is also starting to pose a threat to Mitt’s being the front runner..
So…what’s going to happen? interesting. I hope that if Cain does get the nod..which he won’t…he isnot an Obama plant to blow it all like MC CAIN DID …..
stoptheliesbho
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:21amYESSSSSSSSSSSSS!!! This guy is SO genuine. I’m not on the Cain Train because I was lured onto it. I’ve done my homework, and I know waht this man STANDS on. He is THE best candidate to run against Obama and win! I love Paul, too – but he won’t puch Obama out. Can’t wait to see Cain trample 0bama!!
Report Post »taxwarrior
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:35amHow soon until Axelrod finds the picture (photoshopped) of Cain wearing a KKK outfit. That‘s next on the list isn’t it.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:45amCain does not walk the talk. He and his followers will learn the hard way that this topic is really, actually a serious matter. In his speeches he makes a point of saying how important this is, then in his deeds he demeans and mocks the importance. I would support him better if he walked the walk he talks.
TEA
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:46amI love Herman Cain, 9-9-9 however needs some work and will be ripped apart by the media and the Obamanites. At this point I am leaning towards…
Gingrich – West 2012
Gingrich – Cain
I would prefer West as the Veep as he is younger than Cain and this country could sure use 16 consecutive years of Conservatism.
Report Post »GilbertAcct
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:51amStopthelies… finally a Cain supporter who has done their homework!
Have you looked into 9-9-9-9 and calculated the difference in your tax bill under his plan? (don’t forget the hidden 9% that your company will have to pay on your salary because Cain’s plan eliminates the deductibility of wages for businesses)
Also, have you figured out how he is going to balance the budget in one year without touching SS, Medicare or Military?
I honestly have not found any Cain supporters who are willing address these questions, so I’m wondering what your thoughts are…
Report Post »lifelinz
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:02amDo your own calculating:
http://999calculator.net/
Report Post »karenjerry
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:14amxabw468
Washington Establishment terrified of Herman Cain…….He will wreck their playhouse
Report Post »It’s time the people stand up and take our country back
WE ARE ON THE BRINK OF LOSING OUR COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone please wake up and pay attention to what’s happening in Washington
This President has the audacity to threaten those on Social Security. Do the math people there should be 2.4 trilion left in OUR Account. This is OUR money and is not for them to spend.
What if your 401K money suddenly vanished? Bernie Maddoff is serving time for doing the very same thing our politicians have done to OUR retirement account.
beckisnuts.
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:22amOld Spermin’ Herman the One Eyed German is a hoot. I bet he’d get a kick out of this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/55751455@N02/6334205305/in/photostream/
Report Post »encinom
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:39amPlease Tea Party, GOP nominate Cain, every Democrate will thank you.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:05pmMoncine said “I would support him better if he walked the walk he talks.” — as if that troll EVER supported ANY conservative to ANY extent!
Report Post »GilbertAcct
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:10pmLifelinz… thanks for the link, but the sales tax is only a small portion of the taxes you‘ll be paying under Cain’s plan. I’m all for a fair tax, but Cain’s plan is far from a fair tax plan. Take the 9% your company will pay on your wages, then add the 9% you pay on your income, then add the sales tax. Your calculator link somewhat exaggerates the savings (in my opinion). When it is all said and done, you will actually pay more under Cain’s plan.
Report Post »Founding Father2
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:51pmCAIN, PERRY, AND ROMNEY ARE UNDER THE BIGGEST ATTACK BY THE LIBERAL MEDIA
Cain of course is under attack for the allegations of sexual harassment, since there is no evidence and these seem to be baseless claims.
Perry is under attack, by things he did to himself but are blown out of proportion. He isn’t the best debater and maybe not the best for president but the attacks he is under are overboard, President Obama has done way worse.
Romney is under attack by a campaign started back with Ted Kennedy that Romney flip-flops. Kennedy used that same tactic on all of his competitors but Romney is the only one to make it big afterwards. Come to find out these claims are unprecedented as well: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/projects/nov/auto/auto_bailout_forum.html
THIS IS THE LIBERAL MACHINE TRYING TO PICK OUR CANDIDATE AND WE NEED TO CHOOSE THEM FOR OURSELVES WITH ALL THE INFORMATION.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 1:36pmHe just keeps right on digging, losing the votes of women and independents with every word. You might as well get used to the idea that Romney will be the candidate.
Report Post »GilbertAcct
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 1:58pmFounding Father… I‘ve seen you post this website quite a few times so I’ve finally checked it out.
Did you create this website? I have a few suggestions…
First of all, the word “Consistant” in the subtitle should be corrected to “Consistent”…
Secondly, the sentence highlighted in red stating, “VERDICT-VIDEO TO BE RELEASED FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2001″… this obviously isn’t 10 years old right? I’m guessing you meant “November 18, 2011″?
Lastly, all that this “Panel” did was post a bunch of article links in the “Source of Clarity or Debate” column and then state “Anti-Auto Bailout“ in the corresponding ”Panel‘s Stance on Romney’s Stances” column. This is supposed to be the great end all be all of the flip flop debate?? I don’t have time to read all the articles, but the few that I did read led me to the conclusion that he has definitely flipped and flopped on the issue.
For example, saying things like, “I’m not open to a bailout, but I am open to a workout… Washington should not be a benefactor, but it can and must be a partner” is pretty pro bailout to me. He just changed the word to “workout”. This was referring to his $20 billion promise of taxpayer money to be directed toward the auto industry. Even the Salt Lake Tribune said that this stance was “wholly inconsistent with his claims to be the real conservative in the race.”
I would find a legitimate website to post next time.
Report Post »Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 2:45pmMLS – You miss the reality that is going on here.. These attacks are the actions of the Alinsky radicals. The formula: If they attack it, it is good and just (and it scares the helll out of them). Vote for it..
Report Post »saranda
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 3:10pmLifelinz – what an unbelievably naive way to calculate the effect of 9-9-9. OPne thing Cain is good at is presenting a simple explanation….too bad simple is not the answer even with 9-9-9. Please do your homework beyond plugging two numbers into a “calculator” that makes assumptions of the real world from a completely naive perspective.
Report Post »NewLife56
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:56amThose runnning had better hope they don’t fart in public, this is getting sickining, Cain was repeating what someone had said, good grief, now even the lean right press has duped this low? Com’on ENOUGH
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:10amLEAN RIGHT PRESS????? And just how far to the left do YOU lean??????
Report Post »rfraley
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:53amIn the immortal words of The Joker “Why so serious”. Let the Cain Train roll…………………………….
Report Post »PGMike
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:06am“Why so serious?” The future of the free world is just a little bit serious, don’t you think? Herman Cain needs to stop steppin in it and get serious. Princess Nancy, is she going to endorse me? 9-9-9,
Report Post »9-9-9 is a bumper sticker, not a viable tax plan.
Let me show you an example. Herman wants to establish “sales tax free enterprise zones” in disadvantaged areas all across the county. This is a terrible idea. We do not need the government choosing winners and losers again. What happens to the businesses just outside of his enterprise zone. They are destroyed because people can go just across the street and get a 9% discount by avoiding the tax. This is not a conservative idea. He had to add it to his plan because his plan is so bad for the average working family. A huge tax increase on the poor.
“Why so serious?” If we don’t get serious real quick we are going to give Pres. Obama 4 more years to destroy our country.
thegrassroots
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:20amGood Job Of “Bearding-The-Lion,” Herman! BHO and his dum-lib-lemmings can’t stand it when their pseudo-slander-card is laughed at instead of being endorsed.
America’s on to the loser-in-chief and his mud-hurling-tantrums when he gets scared. Thanks BHO and Minions and Lemmings — for not only doing a great job of campaigning against yourselves — for doing a great job of entertaining America! Keep It Up!
Report Post »GilbertAcct
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:30pmPGMike… I completely agree… And Cain says this will get rid of the IRS, but he says that the 9% sales tax is only for new goods. Well how does he expect that to be regulated? This, along with the tax free zones that you mentioned will invite a whole new regulatory body to evolve. It is a disaster of a plan, and does not fix the problem. Plus my taxes will go from about 15% to about 20%!
Report Post »jaylew
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 4:12pm@pgmike below….respectfully…you and i are going to pay for all the poor people anyway….so having them at least take ownership to some small degree of this countries fiscal matters is not a bad thing. Just forget about every politician in play right now and ask this one simple question. If an entire political party has an agenda that always benefits those that pay NOTHING because the SOMETHING is taken from those that HAVE. What election machine lever will those NOTHING payers always pull? Until everyone in this country has at least SOME vested literal interest in every political election…and by interest I mean something they OWN ( as in money) …until that happens..you and I and those who have SOMETHING will always be paying for those who have NOTHING. and worse…the NOTHING’s will have NOTHING to gain and everything to LOSE by ever voting for a candidate that even suggests otherwise. Cains end state goal is NOT 9-9-9…it is the fair tax….9-9-9 is only an interim step into the world of compelling EVERYONE to have a stake in EVERY election cycle…some stakes bigger than others to be sure…but certainly you would agree with me…that it a personal source of irritation to study candidates and elections only to have your vote ruined by those that have NOTHING to lose. It really can’t be any simpler than that.
Report Post »PGMike
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 5:50pm@jaylew
Report Post »While it is true that the poor pay no federal income tax they do pay social security tax so it really is not fair to say that they do not pay anything.
Having said that I agree with you that unless you have a stake in the system you have nothing to lose by asking the system for more and more while giving the system less and less. I just do not believe that 9-9-9 is the way to go. It is a massive tax cut to the wealthy and a massive tax increase on the poor and has no chance of passing in our current political state. We need to address spending right now not revenue. Once we get spending under control then we can talk about what is the right way to raise the money we need to operate. It is absolutely true that our tax system is horribly broken. I just think that if we nominate Cain and he focuses on 9-9-9 we will end up with another 4 years of disaster and I am afraid after that it will be too late.
louise
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:50amwho could vote for this guy? Geeze
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »stogieguy7
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:52amMe. And a heck of a lot more people than would ever vote for Ron Paul.
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:56amRon Paul: Promising change since 1976.
Time’s up.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:58amI think a Cain/Paul or Paul/Cain ticket would be great.
Report Post »Lordchamp
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:03amRon Paul has some good ideas but has never learned when to keep his mouth shut and how to work a crowd. Plus many of his supporters help even more to turn people off for him but I won’t mention any names.
Sometimes it’s best to keep your mouth shut about what you believe until the American people are ready for it. He has never and will never learn that. It doesn’t make him wrong, it just makes him unelectable.
Report Post »Docrow
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:08amOh how correct you are THX-1138.
Report Post »Trenaway
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:13amI am voting for him, because unlike Paul he will not try to tear down our military. The only program MANDATED by our Constitution! Ron Paul somehow forgets that when he says he only does what the Constitution states. No to the Church of Ron Paul Cultist Freaks!
Report Post »louise
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:20amTHX 1138 …….Ron Paul: Promising change since 1976.
Time’s up.
That is correct. It has taken this long for Americans to awaken from their Keynesian stupor and educate themselves about the differences regarding a corporatist democracy and a Constitutional Republic; militarism and strong homeland defense; Constitutional foreign policy and establishment of an empire; and last but not least the difference between growing up to be mature and honorable adults instead of remaining children who need their nanny state to be their caregiver.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »resme
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:35am@trenaway. What if christians are for peace, not preemptive war?
Also, It’s a difference in defense and militarism.
Report Post »takemout
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:49amMe too!
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 12:41pmLOL. Ron Paul? Ron Paul who? 2012 also ran…
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 2:09pmTrenaway, Paul will not tear down our military, he will just get rid of the wasteful spending in the military budget. He is for a strong Natl defense, probably the best ideas out of any other candidate on this issue. The only type of war we have to be concerned with is nuclear, and we have enough subs to station them around the world for a deterent. We will not be attacked here by an invading force, but rather by people wanting to do us harm by sneaking into the country. I say bring our troops home and have them secure the border, then fix our countries economic woes. Paul will do that and he will do it Constitutionally.
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:49amHermanator : 1
Report Post »Dirtbags: 0
Trenaway
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:13amRight on! Right on!
Report Post »eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:43amHerman had better get SERIOUS about how easy it is to be “ lured” into audiences
statements AND HIS REACTION TO IT….
because his reaction IS WHAT WILL MAKE THE HEADLINES!
Herman is one who enjoys a good sense of humor – however,
his personality tendency is to laugh BEFORE he thinks about the perception of his reaction.
IF he’s not CAREFUL – he could be perceieved as though he takes “sexual”
matters LIGHTLY.
I DON’T BELIEVE HE DOES – but his quick natured reactions and responding
to random audience shout-outs like this, could land him in hot water and
having to explain himself, AGAIN.
You NEED TO WATCH IT, HERMAN.
Report Post »Lordchamp
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:06amTo hell with Political Correctness. It’s ruining us a human beings and ruining us as a Country. It’s refreshing to see a REAL person who is not afraid to be himself and I think most Americans understand that and are ready and willing to accept it.
We’re tired of the CRAP!!
Report Post »Brizz
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:29amPC squashes free speech and discourages healthy debate.
Report Post »kmichaels
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:51amI have to agree with LordChamp. Political correctness has zero value to real Americans. I say to Cain, keep up the jokes about idiots like Princess Nancy and useful idiots like Anita Hill. Is this taking harrasment lightly? No, it is taking false claims of harassment lightly. And more power to Cain in telling it like it is.
Report Post »Apple Bite
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:42amBrilliant! He said more would step forward but wasn’t sure who…. and look who’s coming to dinner?
Report Post »It’s was fittingly appropriate to respond the way he did at this point. The entire ordeal is practical joke.
Oraclevoiceofreason
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:41amNot that I care about this non issue – but it would be good advise to take – that he have a better FILTER – think before you speak…
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:53amHerman doesn‘t have to think before he speaks because he doesn’t have to lie. Professional Politicians (read Professional Liars) got us here. They sure as hell aren’t going to get us out.
Report Post »PGMike
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:59amHerman Cain will not win the nomination. The people who support Herman just love the way he goes about things: Smoking commercial, Princess Nancy, Is she going to endorse me? etc because they think it means that he is unafraid of being politically correct. What it really means is that he lacks the necessary discipline to win a general election. The more he comes out with statements like this the more his base will donate to his campaign and the more he will slip in the polls. The general public does not pay attention to real issues, they pay attention to headlines and for two straight weeks Herman Cain has had bad headlines. It will start to have an effect in the polls very soon.
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:05am@PGMike
So you have no problem with the DNC, RNC and MSM picking our candidates?
Serf much?
Report Post »PGMike
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:17am@TX 1138
Report Post »It does not matter if I have a problem with it or not, it is reality! 95% of people know 2 things about Herman Cain: 9-9-9 and he has been accused of sexual harrassment. They handled this in about as bad a way as they could. They should have gotten in front of it but instead it has become a drip, drip, drip of negative press. Herman has let the media define him and now he will have to fight that definition the whole campaign.
Romney has done the same thing. The media defined him as a flip-flopper and now he has to fight that. Even though in reality he has not flip-flopped more than any other candidate.
People read headlines. To win an election you need to control the headlines. Herman is losing the headline war.
THX-1138
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:28am@PGMike
If that is indeed the case then why have an election at all? If “95%” of the voters are too stupid to look past the propaganda then maybe it really is time for a violent revolution (history indicates that it’s practically a forgone conclusion with a population that stupid and gutless). People that dumb don‘t deserve to be free and won’t be for long.
My theory (hope?) is that the pain the average “95%”er is dealing with and the incredibly low trust numbers for Congress and the Press (look it up!) will turn these brain dead serfs into patriots.
If not, then it’s looking like Civil War 2.0 is unavoidable.
I’m cool with it. I hope the rest of you are too…
Report Post »PGMike
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:49am@ TX 1138
Report Post »I am not saying that the 95% crowd is stupid I am simply saying they are not paying attention yet.
Another case in point: Rick Perry. The media narrative is that he is stupid. That does not mean that he is but it sure does mean that every time he says or does something stupid the media will pounce on it. The only way he can combat that is to stop doing and saying stupid things.
That is my whole point about Herman Cain. Stop making jokes about and calling women names! The narrative is that he is insensitive to women, so stop being insensitive to women or be willing to face media criticism.
We really need to tone down the rhetoric. How can you be cool with Civil War 2.0? Millions of people would suffer and die in a civil war.
We need to have discipline and use a clear message to win the hearts and mind of the 95%.
Off to work. Somebody has to pay all the bills for the occupy crowd.
C. Schwehr
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:53amTHX-1138: While I’m not “cool with that” about a revolution, I do believe that this election in 2012 will be the deciding factor whether or not there will be one eventually.
Report Post »Elect a conservative that can ram through tax reforms and allow the economy to recover, and we’ll have about 5 or 6 rough years while the country comes back from the edge.
Re-elect the current marxist and you’ll be guaranteeing a quick trip over that cliff edge and a civil war within 5 years after that, if not sooner. And the marxists are betting on a sleigh ride down the cliff face to safety…..
kmichaels
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:57amPGMIKE, you come across as stiff and overal anal about things.
Report Post »PGMike
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 5:43pm@kmichaels
Report Post »Wow! What a helpful and insightful comment that was.
crackerone
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:39amAnd he had the nerve, to tell me, these used to grow on my head!
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:39amCain thinks that sexual harassment is a joke – it is not.
Report Post »piper60
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:46amwrong, bilge breath. He is dealing with a bad situation as best he can.
Report Post »Tepeyac
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:46amGet a life!
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:56amHe stated more than once that sexual harassment is a very serious matter. The things is, there wasn’t any. These… people… are lying through their teeth about him and he has no reason to give the slightest bit of a damn about them.
Report Post »Brizz
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:02am@TRI-OX
Report Post »Mr. Cain has made it very clear that sexual harassment is far from a joke. Maybe you should listen to him when he speaks. It’s not wise to rush to judgement. The truth will eventually come out.
C. Schwehr
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:48amAnother TROLL against Cain….when you can’t take the lies seriously, you laugh them off! But I take Cain very seriously as the next President!
Report Post »cruzinbill
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:32amHow about finding out facts instead of listening to some polical hack lawyer.
Report Post »shrinkwraped
Posted on November 14, 2011 at 9:26pmHe does not think sexual harassment is a joke. He thinks anita hill’s claims of sexual harassment was and is a joke. Many of us do. Heck, he didn’t drive a woman off a bridge and leave her to die, he didn’t send pics of his junk (like Weiner), he didn’t flavor his cigar with ******* juices from an intern (talk about a power disparity….), he didn’t talk to Senators on the phone while the intern gave him a B (ill) J (efferson), his significant other didn’t run an escort service out of their basement (like Barny the clown/representative), he didn’t have his actress/mistress sing happy birthday to him at a party he and his wife attended (the great Kennedy), and he was not accused of rape by a couple women (Billy J again). Just darn dems: what exactly is your beef?
Report Post »teddrunk
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:34amMr. Cain, for your own sake, don’t drink Cocoa Cola out of a can before the election.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 1:39pmted!!!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:29amYOUR SENSI and DEMINT…. ( will OLD ,MBRITZ, SPQR1 also be harassing us ?) looks like the Trolls are on-duty ! Happy Veterans Day.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:27amThink it is wonderful to see a man who is undaunted by the continual POLITICAL HARASSMENT of the White House campaign goon squads. See what they did to Bachman ? This is the standard HARASSMENT tactic of our Occupier-In-Chief and his union mobs. Deplorable. Glad to see Cain stand up to their Media assaults and character assassinations of EVERY potential Republican presidential candidate. ( will now check the New York Times to see who is their front page, political hate- Target of the Day !)
Report Post »Salamander
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:46amThey had to hit him with something, and the race card wouldn’t have worked! So, what’s the next best grenade in the ammo box? Of course, it is the sexual harassment one–sure beats the polar bears!
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:47amSo gaffes and stupid statements coming out of the mouths of your candidates are part of a White House plot? And here I thought you were the party of personal responsibility.
OBAMA WINS 2012!
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:51amYes, your people… And you are proud I see…
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:07amDEMINTD : Your mother should have washed your mouth out with soap when you were younger? Using foul language does not substitute for substance .
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:14am@barber.. How about you washing my ball bag ?
Report Post »ares338
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:24amGive me a break! It was funny and did no one any harm. I’m sure feminist will exhibit extreme hand wringing and outrage. Get over it or call the lawyers with pony tails.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:22amSORRY I haven’t a clue why my comment is missing.. I did nothing different.. Oh, well..
Report Post »eyestoseeearstohear
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:19amFYI:
Report Post »http://atlah.org/2011/11/11/the-prophecy-of-jesus-about-obama-and-oprah-winfrey-pt-4/
sempek1
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:17amGive the guy a break. Read Ann Coulter’s latest column about Axelrod and Bailek lliving in the same building in Chicago. Coincidence? Cain is a target because he’d get much of the black vote and would sweep the south according the Haley Barbour. Black pols who’ve made their living encouraging the victim image would be out of a job if Cain gets into power. Cain would help blacks’ nationally unlike Obama who has intentionally encouraged racism. As to the “Princess Nancy” reference, most would not be so kind.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:24amlol @ according to Haley Barbour. What the hell does he know ? lmao….
Report Post »satotbs
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:38amAs to the “Princess Nancy” comment, he should have apologized to princesses real and story for the ridiculous association.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:16amArrogant. It’s not funny at all.
Report Post »seanscythe
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:49amShut up!
Report Post »ConservativeMajority
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:50amAre you kidding? You say crap like this all the time.
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:54amBless your little heart!
Aw, did we hurt your feelings? Frankly, Princess Nancy is the least we can say without getting downright ugly. You should be thankful he kept it so civil.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:11amI am becoming more of a Herman Cain supporter by the day. All of the other candidates leave me cold but his lack of fear at offending the PC elite and his determination to fight back appeals to me. Newt would be my second choice but a Cain/Gingrich ticket would be great.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:30amAnd he’s black too, that’s a big plus, no ?
Report Post »Brad Wesselmann
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:48amBlind racism is never a plus to an honorable man. Regardless of what color a man is, ignorance is abundant in all.
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:50amMe too! The more he preaches to the choir the less appealing he becomes to the general population and the sooner he gets off the stage.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:21amOnly the progressives/liberals care what a persons skin color is.
Report Post »Brizz
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:32am@MOMRULES
Report Post »Mega Dittos!
circleDwagons
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 1:43pmhe’s black? had not notice. love his humor and his 999 plan CAIN / Paul 2012
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:06amShe MIGHT endorse him if he wasn’t a serial sexual harasser.
Report Post »hi
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:36amThe first accuser sued her next boss. She is sue-happy. The last accuser was photographed with Cain a month earlier at a Tea Party event! Why would she put her arm around a man who traumatized her? even her friends say she is a total gold digger. She even lived next to Axelrod.
He is not a serial sexual harasser. This is all a set up to bring Cain down because he is awesome!
Report Post »Salamander
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:52amYou know what would put this fire out? Throw a little gasoline on it! Wouldn’t it be a hoot, if “The Clinton Girls”, the string of women he had trashed after they came forward and accused Clinton of sexual improprieties, came forward and campaigned for Cain! Who better than that group of abused women to sniff out the truth in this matter, and convey the unvarnished results to the voting public!
Report Post »Lordchamp
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 10:20amProof of that statement? Got none huh?
I understand common sense is at a premium here but lets at least attempt to use it. The more you use it the easier it becomes. I know it‘s a new thing but it’s worth the effort.
Ok, this man has been in the public eye and business for 40+ years. Married to the same woman for 40+ years. Using your new found common sense technique don‘t you think that if he had the types of personality issues that he’s being accused of that companies would not continue to hire him since he would be a lawsuit waiting to happen? Business does not work that way. Real life (not media created life) does not work that way.
There now you’ve had your very first use of your new common sense skills. Keep working on them and they WILL improve with time.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 11:15amLordChump . . . ” . . . been in the public eye and business for 40+ years. Married to the same woman for 40+ years . . . if he had the types of personality issues that he’s being accused of that companies would not continue to hire him since he would be a lawsuit waiting to happen . . . Business does not work that way . . . Real life (not media created life) does not work that way.”
Oh, Lord, Lordy, Lordy, Lordy . . . you know who you just described? Jerry Sandusky.
There now you’ve had your very first use of your new reality skills. Keep working on them and they WILL improve with time.
Report Post »JefeHalager
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 2:29pmto yoursensei….. Sandusky WAS NOT hired anywhere else, so you trying to compare the two is completely false and misleading….but so are the rest of your posts.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 2:40pmJeffHalogern . . . That MAY be the lamest attempt at rationalization I have heard yet here on The Blaze. I say MAY because, well, that’s quite a mountain to climb.
Report Post »JefeHalager
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 3:06pmto YOUR SENSEI…..you really are slow aren’t you? I was clearly pointing out how YOUR comparing the two is idiotic… Alls you can do is reply with what you may deem an insult?… You must be a very creative and free thinker ;-) btw since when is molesting little boys even in the same ballpark as ‘acqusations’ by grown women against a grown man. Only a mentally sick person would even compare the two, like you are trying to do!!
Report Post »762x51
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 4:00pmAh Sensless, the perpetual Lib-lapdog. You never miss an opportunity to parrot your leftist masters do you? Your inability to think for yourself dooms you to a life of liberalism. Poor deranged creature, you are pathetic.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 6:36pmJeffhaggleswithself . . . I was hoping you’d make more sense the second time around. No such luck.
Report Post »JefeHalager
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 8:07pmEnjoy your weekend little man. Must really suck being so lonely in your world, I sincerely feel bad for you. Hope you find happiness somewhere in your life so you don’t have to resort to elementry put downs on a blog to feel big/important. I’m off to hang with friends and family for the weekend, hope you can say the same.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:03amMy kind of Guy!
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:07amLuuuuuuuuke. I am your gay lover.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:14amYou honestly like this? It’s the kind of skanky quip Obeyme would us. I, for one, don‘t want another president that’s just like Obambi and the more I see of Cain, the more similarities between the two show up. They both play the race card, they both have a cult of personality, they both are popular because of speech style and supposed ‘likability’, they are both thin skinned, they both have hidden their pasts and they both are terribly inexperienced. And now Cain is again copying Obummer by putting up his own version of ‘fight the smears’.
Report Post »Cain is just Obungler with an ‘R’ after his name.
BuckeyeDuck
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:31amWow… That’s all I can say… The Paulbots are smearing Cain and comparing him to Obama to try to damage his campaign. Do you think that will actually help Ron Paul win?? I sometimes like what Paul says, but let’s be honest, a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama… Stop smearing other true conservatives and let’s work together to get Obama out. If you really want to railroad a RINO, work to knock down Romney. HE is the one closest to Obama on what kind of POTUS he would be.
Cain in 2012…
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:45am@BuckeyeDuck.. Just to give you a heads up.. Not everyone that doesn’t like Cain is a Paulie.. I for one don’t like Cain and I think Ron Paul is a kook… I’m looking elsewhere because, unlike most on this site, I don‘t believe that it’s going to take another “black man ” to defeat obama.. I believe obama can be defeated with sound conservative principals and someone that can articulate that message to the fullest in a way for most voting Americans can relate to… Get it out of your head that opposes Cain are automatically Paulbots.. Nowhere in KTsayz comment was Paul even mentioned..
Report Post »BuckeyeDuck
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:52amNo, I looked up KT’s past comments and they are a Paulbot. I understand there are people who don’t like Herman Cain, but that isn’t the only thing going on with them…
Report Post »louise
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:55amKTSAYZ,
Report Post »I agree with you. It is not funny
BuckeyeDuck
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:57amBesides, I don’t think it will take a black man to beat Obama. I have been a Herman Cain fan and supporter from the very beginning. I believe he is a true conservative that supports SMALL gov’t and a rollback of the repressive, regulatory monster that our Fed Gov’t has become. I like his bold ideas for phasing in the Fair Tax and his feisty nature. I have a lot of respect for Ron Paul for being very principled, but don’t appreciate his worshipers working so hard to get OBAMA re-elected…
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:58am@BuckeyeDuck.. Got ya.. Ok cool.. Atleast someone understands the difference.. You should try to explain that to Barber..
Report Post »lylejk
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:00amWhat’s wrong with having some fun with constituance that are backing him. A non-story that, of course, the left and the RiNO/Progressives will want to feign disgust. Keep on smokin’ Mr. Cain. Perry’s pretty much done for, so it’ now pretty much you and Romney w/ Gingrich inching up too. :)
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:10amThere is nothing wrong with it! Remeber Reagan’s “We begin bombing in five minutes” quip? The left just about had a cow.
Report Post »RichNGadsden
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:18amGONZO, LOL, I’m a Cold War vet and was stationed in Germany when Reagan said that. I just about split my gut when AFN finally ran the clip.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:38amThanks for your service Rich. Gadsden Al.?
Report Post »ColoradoMaverick
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 8:59amGood for Cain. It shows he has a sense of humor and is not afraid to be politically incorrect despite the allegations against him. If he were guilty of these things, he would tread much more carefully don’t you think?
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:08amI DO think. Keep talking Herb. A few more Princess Nancy jokes oughtq put you over the top.
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:09amHe did say in one of the debates that he would bring a sense of humor to the white house and it shows. He seems to be a normal everyday guy, which I find appealing and refreshing. Go Herman, you ROCK!
Report Post »dukeofpaducah
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:14amYou are so right. Cain is still the man. Someone guilty would not dare joke about Hill or any other sexual accuser, of which there have been many. You don’t hear any jokes of that nature coming from the poster boy of sexual misdeeds, Slick Willy Clinton. Here’s an idea. Why doesn‘t the lame stream media ask Hillary what she thinks about Cain’s alleged escapades and how they may compare to her husband’s HAHAHA>
Report Post »ONEOFMILLIONS
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:46amYou are absolutely right COLORADOMAVERICK. If he were guilty of anything he would stay away from everything related to that topic. Isn’t it refreshing to listen to the comments of a man with a very clear conscious and a geniune sense of humor. Herman Cain is one of the solutions, he is not the only solution but he is one of the solutions.
Report Post »Old-Hippie-Patriot
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 3:21pmI am thinking after reading Herman Cain’s biography on friends-of web sight that the
(False Harassment) claims against him were carefully laid after he helped defeat
“Hillary Care”… the way I understand things that would be the Chicago/Clinton way.
Someone must have recoginized he had the ability/qualities to go far.
From the web site…
“In 1994, as head of the National Restaurant Association, he had the opportunity to speak with President Clinton during a nationally televised town hall meeting. Here, Herman challenged the President regarding the impact on businesses if his health care overhaul proposal were passed. President Clinton attempted to assure him and the millions of viewers watching at home that his legislation would not harm American business owners and their employees.
Herman was skeptical. “Quite honestly Mr. President, your calculations are incorrect,” he said. “In the competitive marketplace, it simply doesn’t work that way.”
His words echoed across America, and Newsweek named Herman Cain the primary saboteur of Hillarycare.”
Report Post »barber2
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 8:57amSo ?
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on November 11, 2011 at 9:09amMmm . . . yes . . . cogent analysis, barber of 2ville.
Report Post »