Politics

‘Because…’: Ron Paul Explains Why He Calls Santorum a ‘Fake’

Comments (321)

1 2 3 4
  • egg
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:04pm

    zinggggg

    Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:16pm

      Santorum’s Record on Immigration

      Voted against increasing the number of immigration investigators.

      Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens.

      Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens.

      Voted to give welfare benefits to naturalized citizens without regard to the earnings of their sponsors.

      Voted against hiring an additional 1,000 border patrol agents, paid for by reductions in state grants.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:32pm

      Paul voted yes on invading of Afghanistan. Without a declaration of war. Doesn’t he love the constitution? Was Paul confused? Or is he a Neo-Con warmonger? Maybe Lew Rockwell voted for him, Paul was busy delivering a baby

      RepubliCorp  
    • KICKILLEGALSOUT
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:34pm

      Straight from Dr. Paul on why Santorum is a fake conservative. This country needs real contrast to Obama and Dr. Paul is that man. If any of the other fake conservatives win the nomination Obama’s billion dollar war chest is going to annihilate them and guarantee him another 4 years. Ron Paul is the only real candidate willing to fight for our freedom, liberty, and fiscal sanity. Stop feeling you mus compromise your vote for a pre paid for pre chosen establishment candidate.

      During his time in the Senate, Santorum voted to:

      Give millions of taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood;

      Raise the debt ceiling five times;

      DOUBLE the size of the Department of Education through the budget-busting and unconstitutional “No Child Left Behind” bill;

      Start a brand new, unfunded entitlement, Medicare Part D, the largest expansion of entitlement spending since President Lyndon Johnson – creating $16 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities;

      Stand with senators like Barbara Boxer and Frank Lautenberg to pass massive new federal gun control schemes and regulations;

      Keep workers under Big Labor’s thumb by voting against a National Right to Work law;

      Send $25 million in taxpayer dollars to North Korea;

      Pass Sarbanes-Oxley, which imposed dramatic new job-killing accounting regulations on businesses.

      Report Post » KICKILLEGALSOUT  
    • GB__The Holy Warmonger
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:38pm

      Glenn must be real happy tonight that his anointed one, Santorum is staying the course of entering into that righteous war against Iran.

      Does Glenn think Congress should declare war first or just let ‘em have it?

      Report Post » GB__The Holy Warmonger  
    • Mutiny
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:46pm

      @republicorp

      Ron Paul voted for the authorization to go after Bin Laden. He didnt vote for the authorization to stay there ten years and rebuild their country while hunt every ********** that has a AK. Also, Ron Paul asked for us to use Letters of Marque and Reprisal to get Bin Laden instead of a full blown invasion that would cost us more lives than lost on 911 and trillions of dollars. Oh by the way, Bin Laden’s plan to bleed us dry with many conflicts is working to perfection. We fell for it hook line and sinker.

      Report Post » Mutiny  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:54pm

      Mutiny

      You are EXACTLY right.

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • blamelessace5
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:09pm

      The pot calling the kettle black……lol

      Report Post » blamelessace5  
    • Tankertony
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:15pm

      Whenever you prevent a terrorist regime that has been waging war against America and killing Americans since 1979 from getting nuclear weapons…….it is a RIGHTEOUS war.

      Report Post » Tankertony  
    • Mutiny
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:21pm

      @blameless

      What what Ron Paul is fake?

      Report Post » Mutiny  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:25pm

      Tankertony

      Who do you think put that terrorist regime in charge?

      WE DID

      DO SOME RESEARCH, THINGS ARENT WHAT THEY SEEM.

      Oh and just so you know, government lies from time to time. We dont need another war in the middle east.

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • Mutiny
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:41pm

      @tank

      LOL you either got your info from a talking head (Glenn, Billy, Sean, or Rush) or you just are repeating something from someone on here.

      Here, read and learn.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

      This is the exact mentality that has us in the place we are in now. Global police force and broke.

      Wake up, and listen to the one thing Glenn says now that is still correct “do your own research”.

      Report Post » Mutiny  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:15am

      @KICKILLEGALSOUT
      This country needs real contrast to Obama and Dr. Paul is that man.
      —–
      Riiight. That’s why Donna “B.S.” Brazile gets a tingle up her leg when Paul speaks, as do Ahmadnutjob, Hamas, the KKK, NAMBLA, Truthers, Junkies Inc., Sex Slaves International, the Youthful Neo-Idiots of the Left and last but not least, The Baawashed Citizens of America.

      Report Post »  
    • libsaredumb
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:20am

      The Blaze is no different than the other lame-stream media, pushing an agenda. Can we just get someone to tell us the news without framing or spinning. The truth lives here? Just another gimmick.

      Report Post »  
    • jonnyfontain
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:28am

      I love how this old man who is really considered a bit of a weirdo by the general population attacks Rick Santorum a man who is above all God Fearing which is EXACTLY what we are lacking in our country. Not once have I heard Ron Paul talk about the importance of the “Family”, the importance of “abstinence”, the importance of Jesus Christ and Religious Freedom. Just because you think that the Government shouldn’t get involved in social issues (which I agree with that) doesn‘t mean that you shouldn’t be a role model for our children and the goodness of society! Ron Paul doesn’t give ANY speeches in supporting Christian Values and if you believe in God than you must believe that our first goal as believer is too live for that God! We have got it backwards America. We all have become self-ritous, greedy, and selfish. We would rather do for ourselves than for the common good of all mankind. We have dropped the ball, we need to get on our knees and pray for forgiveness from God for becoming a country where 40% of children grow up in single parent homes where the poverty levels are 5 times higher because their is no father in the equation. Its not just the mans fault, its both women and men’s fault for becoming self serving a$$ holes and putting the children last instead of first where they belong. We need to pray and ask for forgiveness for electing an un-christian poser like obama, who has done more for our enemies than the people of America.

      Report Post » jonnyfontain  
    • Vindex.Dogood
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:24am

      @jonnyfontain

      If you have not seen or heard Ron Paul speak on Christian values, you are getting your news from the wrong sources.

      Ron Paul speech at the Iowa Faith and Freedom Conference
      http://youtu.be/v2ggqApNI6s

      Report Post » Vindex.Dogood  
    • str8blues
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:42am

      @Mutany So let me get this straight……..you’re referring people to Wikileaks as your source for legitimate information? The founder of wikileaks and enemy of the US is now employed by RUSSIA TODAY……the State Run RUSSIAN Media outlet and you use that as your source to defend Ron Paul?
      Big Mistake my friend. Russia Today RT is a communist propaganda outlet and Wikileaks is a liberal source for reinventing history in America. So…come on man……surely you can quote better sources than Wikileaks. But please don’t attach a link to Alex Jones conspiracy site……as do most Ron Paul supporters. They jump from Communist Propaganda to Conspiracy Lunacy. Hence Ron Pauls 3% national support. SANTORUM/RUBIO 2012

      Report Post »  
    • Texas Chris
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:39am

      First, RT is not state run.

      Second, wouldn’t the US governmet declare a whistleblower as an “enemy”?

      It’s jsut sad that the sources of real news are dneegrated while MSM like the Blaze keep on spinning.

      And people just eat it up.

      Sad.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:33am

      Here are some interesting tweets about tonight’s debate:

      Ann Coulter @AnnCoulter Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      I LOVE RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      The Fix @TheFix Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      Ron Paul is jotting down various questions he could answer if he ever got asked questions. #cnndebate

      pourmecoffee @pourmecoffee Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      Ron Paul: Guns don’t kill people, Ben Benanke kills people!

      Ann Coulter @AnnCoulter Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      ron paul on illegal immigration: get off my lawn!

      Ezra Klein @ezraklein Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      Ron Paul totally right that loose nukes are a more plausible danger than Iranian nukes.

      Joy Behar @JoyVBehar Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      The three stooges and Ron Paul as far as I can tell right now

      John Fugelsang @JohnFugelsang Close
      I think Ron Paul’s sane half is one of the most inspiring and beautiful politicians in the world.

      GregGutfeld @greggutfeld Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      Ron Paul was feisty – like a man at Ace hardware who bought the wrong sized bolt but cant get a refund without the receipt, which he lost.

      RT America @RT_America Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      Every time Santorum opens his mouth, Ron Paul makes the best faces ever. Ever. #CNNDebate

      Sam Stein @samsteinhp Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
      can’t you just see Ron Paul, perched in a tree, wearing hunting gear, and waiting for a delegate?

      Report Post »  
    • Obeckian1984
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:41am

      here is the whole responce

      http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-highlights-from-2222012-debate/

      Report Post » Obeckian1984  
    • SgtB
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:43am

      I was hoping the whole time that Santorum would lose it and go after Dr. Paul. That way the entire world would know that Paul is not too old to whip someone’s @55.

      Ron Paul 2012…… It’s either that or revolution folks, and I’d rather not have our country look like a war zone.

      Report Post » SgtB  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:25am

      Blaze it has been almost 2 years and you have yet to do a positive article on Dr. Ron Paul yet you’ve spread a little sun light unpon everyone else and most particularly Mitt Romney.

      I was watching CNN after the debate last night and I was like don’t they at least have to act a little non partisan?? Guess the short answer is no isn’t it Blaze? You don’t even make an effort to appear non partisan!

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • 3monkeysmomma
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:08am

      I was at Ron Paul after-party last night in Mesa.

      It was STANDING ROOM ONLY!

      Report Post » 3monkeysmomma  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:50pm

      Finance: Bloomberg “Paul Is Only GOP Contender Whose Policies Would Pare Debt, Analysis Finds”

      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-23/paul-s-plan-would-lower-debt-while-rivals-wouldn-t-report-says.html

      Report Post »  
    • Patrick Henry II
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:18pm

      Amazing Paul will not say anything bad about Romney though???

      Report Post » Patrick Henry II  
    • puravida56
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:17pm

      Ron Paul is the one candidate that will really do what he says he will do. He is a true man of his word…..that should be the standard not the exception.

      Report Post » puravida56  
    • Jefferson
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:41pm

      @3MONKEYSMOMMA
      I’m a little jealous. That looked like one heck of a party! None of these other posers garner anything CLOSE to the love, support, and loyalty that is shown to this great man.
      Here’s a video of the debate watching party in Mesa.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZO-zG7c4fs&feature=youtu.be

      Did you see the active duty military and other veterans march on the WH on Ron Paul’s behalf? It was very powerful. One of my good friends was at the front of the formation, and spoke to the crowd.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XqNmEKoLUE&feature=related

      I am proud to support the only honest man in the race.

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:23pm

      @Repube: Ron Paul also knew, as did the rest of Congress, that bin Laden was in Pakistan in 2007.

      Report Post »  
  • blues guitar
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:51pm

    Congressman for over 20 years Ron Paul trying to sell himself as having all of the answers. What were you doing all those years in the House there skippy? The guy is a menace and twists the Constitution to fit his Lib views. I‘d sit at home before I’d vote for him on election day.

    Report Post »  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:56pm

      wow. i’m sorry you are so wrong. it makes you seem stupid.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • CatB
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:56pm

      That’s what I would like to know . .he acts like he wasn’t even there!

      Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:57pm

      You need to lay of the crack pipe man…

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • justangry
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:59pm

      Check out what RP was trying to do while in congress. Tell me which of his bills that you don’t like. The problem wasn’t him, it’s the parasites that suround him.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul_bills

      Again… ANYONE tell me what he proposed that you don’t like.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:00pm

      Your entilted to your thoughts. But Ron Pauls alliance is to the constiution, not the party. The party(s) have been working together and letting the American dream go down the drain. Ron Paul is the most consistent. He saw this economic mess coming. He can turn it around. Thru glass stegall and other means thru the Fed. I wish you people would really think about whats wrong in AMerica and then listen to Paul. You say he twist the constution, brother that couldnt be further from the truth. Your so use to the BS from the republicans and dems. You have watched the country go down the drain and yall are still trying the same policies.

      In a world of universal deciet, telling the truth is a radical thing.

      EndTheFed

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • Average_Joseph
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:05pm

      The fake is Dr.Paul. Let’s find a bill that will pass, throw in an earmark and then vote against it. Get the best of both worlds, money for the district and the ability to say it was voted against. You sir are the true fraud. Calling all Ronbots.

      Report Post » Average_Joseph  
    • beckyspatflaveredstew
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:14pm

      Can you read? Or were u scooled in amerika.

      Report Post »  
    • Stopit
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:18pm

      Paul won the debate, hands down.

      Report Post »  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:18pm

      Ohhh somebody is upset that their candidate cant take the heat. Welcome to the kitchen girls! This is where you Neocons have been dishing up poop-sandwhichs for almost a year. Santorum equates to a Fake and also is equivalent to a Facist Progressive. Didn’t GB mention progressives in both parties? Democrats (Socialists) and Republicans (Facists)!? Did that slip your memory Beckbots? Santorum is on the roster of the Progressive Team.

      All of you Santorumites arent concerned with limited government? And 5 trillion in 5 years huh!? Do I dare mention the visible political gimmick!?

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • colt1860
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:51pm

      @bluesguitar I don’t think Paul has all the answers. I think his emphasis is that WE SHOULD LOOK TO THE CONSTITUTION FOR OUR ANSWERS, and then start the debates from that point on, instead of having a she said he said beauty contest.

      I don’t think Paul has Liberal views, that is, modern politically liberal views (as opposed to Jeffersonian views). Liberalism today means Government involvement or coercion in order to force, dictate or mandate social equality upon the populace. Paul is against that. Paul believes in individual liberty, personal responsibility/accountability, private property, and free markets. Liberals would need to distort, corrupt, or destroy such principles in order to effectively pass their “views” through the legislature.

      I’d recommend for anyone that would sit at home on election day, to buy a nice comfy lazy chair, a stack of books on the economy, and a good dictionary, and to learn what words mean.

      Plus, would a politician with “liberal views” ever say this, “In Congress, I never vote for any piece of legislation that violates the Constitution’s strict limits on government power.” http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/statement-of-faith/

      I don’t think so.

      Report Post »  
    • girlnurse
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:01pm

      Im glad! I don’t need anyone that dumb on the road when I am in my car driving to go vote for Ron Paul!

      Report Post » girlnurse  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:29pm

      So your choice is Ron Paul a strict constitutionalist, or Obama a fundamental Marxist…and you will stay home and not vote, really?

      Report Post »  
    • followtheexample
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:43pm

      really …really stupid..

      Report Post » followtheexample  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:06am

      @frothy. Your idiocy ceases to amaze. Your utter neglegence of facts and comprehension is astonishing. Clearly, youre incompetent to even fathom a valid articulate/intellectual argument. Being Anti-NeoCon DOES NOT make me anti-Semitic. Leo Strauss (alinsky type tactics) liked to claim people are anti-semitic or un-patriotic, if they don’t cooperate with their agenda. Also, exposing that SomE hassidic’s ARE anti-Christian, DOES NOT make me anti-Semitic. Get off the OxyContin and Valium, da clap man.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:30am

      I’m with ya BG.
      23yrs in public office and out of 620 bills Paul made up, only one ever left his desk. Great record of deforestation by way of paper waste? Santorum is darn sure no more of a “fake” than Paul when you can’t get a straight answer out of the little freak about his own personal views on Israel and the Palistinians. Or social and domestic issues. Instead of stating his opinions on the matters, he just gives his default answer of, “leave it up to the states”. What a worm!
      I have seen enough video and heard enough audio of Paul when he let his guard down and said what he really thinks, that I would never vote for him in good conscience.
      I would stay home too if it was between Paul and Obama. Why bother? The country is doomed either way……………..

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:42am

      @COLT
      Paul is against that. Paul believes in individual liberty, personal responsibility/accountability, private property, and free markets.
      ——-
      “Individual liberty” is Paul’s euphemism for moral anarchy. As for private property and free markets, they cannot coexist with non-interventionism/isolationism, except in the minds of deluded folks.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:25am

      Ugh. Should have said “folk.” Hey, Bets, isn’t hope and change your thingy? Can you fundamentally transform this blog, please? Make it user friendly? How about an edit feature for starters?

      Report Post »  
    • Clutch
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 8:54am

      lol It amazes me how ignorant these people that are against Ron Paul actually are…

      I mean that’s what it has to be, if you look no further than 2 years into Santorum’s past you can see clear as day how fake he is.. you can look 30+ years into Paul‘s past and see he’s a honest man.

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:11am

      @kryptonite

      You have States rights confused with anarchy so by using your logic, Jefferson was an anarchist. Just how does following the Constitution by placing powers not vested with the Feds in the hands of the state “anarchy”?

      Just where in the Constitution do you find the right for the Feds to regulate what you consume? You do know the Amendment that brought us prohibition was based largely on the notion that such powers did not exist in the Constitution….so they passed an amendment that allowed it…right?

      *shakes head*

      You obviously think the founders views regarding foreign policy were deluded as Paul is simply following their wisdom. Your only possible excuse for your disdain for the view of the likes of Washington, Adams, and Jefferson is that their position is outdated….which is the exact same twisted reasoning the left gives to excuse their messed up word view.

      The fact of the matter is your views on foreign policy are much closer to those of Obama and the CFR, than they are to Jefferson, Adams, and Washington, and if that’s not enough to wake you up…what is?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:17am

      Little lost there Blues Guitar?

      Report Post »  
    • FROTHYDISCHARGE
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:53am

      Cause4Liberty My idiocy ceases to amaze? Thanks it would be a lot worse if it “never” ceases to amaze as the saying goes. So when you referred to the “Joo’s” in your previous posts, that was out of respect? You Paultards are the best. You call Rick fake but you nimrods totally buy the fact the RP didn’t know his news letter was full of racism (real racism not code) and antisemitism just so you can get your pot and hookers. I know you‘re getting tired of smoking pencil shavings because you can’t get a job but face it PAUL WILL NOT WIN ONE STATE!!!!

      Report Post » FROTHYDISCHARGE  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:16am

      @FROTHYDISCHARGE

      What does it feel like to be reduced to using the tactics of the left by pulling the old worn out race card?

      Should Paul have done a better job of proof reading…sure, but it is perfectly clear that your worn out tactic of demonization goes against every thing the man has ever personally written, spoken, and voted for.

      And your other worn out line of attack, that people like me are drug users is beyond pathetic as well.

      Now…perhaps you will show us just where in the Constitution the Feds are allowed to have the power to determine just what you are permitted to consume?

      You do know that prohibition was passed based on the fact that the Constitution did not provide such a power, so an amendment was needed….right?

      These powers rightly belong to the STATES, and unless you can provide evidence in the founders writings or in the Constitution itself that claims otherwise, how about simply admitting your are a blind fool who will say anything to destroy the reputation of the only candidate who actually believes in the Constitution?

      Alinski would be SOOOOO proud of you.

      Ron Paul 2012

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • FROTHYDISCHARGE
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:02pm

      FREEPOTLUVER Poor job of proofreading??? The syphilis you got from cause4freedom must be taking it’s toll. Poor proofreading is misspelling a word or omitting a semicolon but claiming not to know the racist, antisemitic crazy conspiracy nutty crap shows who he is and who his supporters are. This is a quote from his news letter in an article entitled “The Coming Race War” “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks,” I guess he missed that one.
      He also said Israel might be behind 9-11, AIDS patients shouldn’t be allowed in restaurants (really smart for a doctor) and the government is giving people chemicals to make them gay.
      You can put whatever you want into your body including CAUSE4FREEDOM but the problem is that when people like you are high they tend to violate the rights of other i.e. kill them, rape them. They legalized pot in MT and crime went up %50.
      Again PAUL will not win 1 state.
      p.s. You‘re a truther aren’t you?

      Report Post » FROTHYDISCHARGE  
    • blues guitar
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:21pm

      Wow, stirring the pot is fun… I love the name calling, Paulbot standard response. You forgot to add what an anti-Patriot I am, don’t understand the Constitution, and am the reason the world is falling apart. Oh wait, some of you did include those comments. To the few of you who did make an intelligent comment:

      1) Paul does not understand the concept of treaties, allies, or foreign policy. If we followed his view, the French wouldn’t have helped us during the Revolutionary war and we would have hung the rest of the world out to dry during two World Wars & the Cold War. 2) If the man can’t convince anyone to follow him after 20 years in Congress, how is he gonna do it as President? Epic Fail for Leadership on his part. 3) Paul keeps referencing why we can‘t do something because it’s not in the Constitution, but the Constitution was made specifically to add changes as time goes on. The problem has been administrations, courts, and the legislative branches perverting the system in place because most of their “pet” ideas would not survive going through a Constitutionally driven process (amendments, etc). I would support Ron Paul for Treasury Secretary or as a Fed Chairman (the only way we would ever find out the truth of what’s going on behind their closed doors).

      As for the nasty commenters, the only thing worse than Ron Paul’s ideas are Ron Paul supporters.

      Report Post »  
    • Hoosieratarian
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:23pm

      @ JUSTANGRY

      I think I hear crickets chirping. Clearly there aren‘t many bills of Ron’s we wouldn’t all love.

      Its funny to me how when people dismiss Ron Paul when they don’t really know about him. there is something about the unfamiliar or difficult to take truth that is scary to people I guess and makes them resist it.

      Whatever it is, its weird!

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:38pm

      @FROTHYDISCHARGE

      Would you care to quote anything Paul has actually written to continue your pathetically worn out Alinski style attacks?

      You do know guilt by association is a logical fallacy…right?

      Here…let me help.

      “In the long run, the only way racism can be overcome is through the philosophy of individualism, which I have promoted throughout my life. Our rights come to us not because we belong to some group, but our rights come to us as individuals. And it id as individuals that we should judge one
      another. Racism is a particularly odious form of collectivism whereby individuals are treated not on their merits but on the basis of group identity. Nothing in my political philosophy, which is the exact opposite of the racial totalitarianism of the twentieth century, gives aid or comfort to such thinking. To the contrary, my philosophy of individualism is the most radical intellectual challenge to racism ever posed.”
      Ron Paul

      http://www.buzzfeed.com/ccbaxter/22-facts-that-dont-jibe-with-ron-paul-being-a-rac-41xp

      The rest of your illogical and ridiculous rant also has no basis in fact, and spewing nonsense and distortions hardly helps your position, and no…I’m not a truther and neither is Paul.

      Now once again…perhaps you will show us just where in the Constitution the Feds are allowed to have the power to determine just what you are permitted to consume?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:00pm

      @blues guitar

      Eeerrr, you speak of name calling and then call others names?

      *shakes head*

      As for your silly claims regarding Paul’s so called views on foreign policy, do you think that by raising a strawman, what you claim becomes automatically true?

      Everything you typed just shows how uninformed you are, and you obviously are historically ignorant.

      Here’s a little history lesson for you, and all it is is a speech given by Adams.

      http://www.fff.org/comment/AdamsPolicy.asp

      As for your complaint of Paul not getting bills passed, your idea of success is what got us into this mess, and would you please point to the bills he proposed that you personally disagree with?

      When you are dealing with fools who have placed us 16 trillion in debt and then whine that Paul didn’t vote for it, you expose yourself as desperate to find anything to hang your hat on.

      Paul bashers like you just keep proving over and over that you have no idea as to what you are attempting to discuss.

      Ron Paul 2012

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • blues guitar
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 2:23pm

      Dear Freed, I haven’t written a single bad name (unless Paulbot hurts your little feelings). I won’t vote for anyone who would throw our allies, many of whom I served beside (like the Izzies) under the bus. There is no strawman, only the gaps in Paul’s logic. Not every politician who came along before Ron Paul is a traitor and corrupted this country (I’m amazed you seriously wrote that). Your accusation shows that you got some pretty heavy Official Ron Paul certified blinders on.

      I don’t like his views on foreign policy and drug policy. Having a different opinion from you does not make me uninformed or uneducated; it means my research came to different conclusions than you. And I seriously worry about anyone who thinks their candidate is absolutely perfect. Jim Jones and David Koresh had the same types of followers.

      There is no one on the R side that I WANT to vote for, but I’ll hold my nose and pull the lever for anyone of them except Ron Paul. Any candidate who has constant trollers on every forum to smear anyone who speaks out against him has serious control issues (nice way to call him a fascist). We saw that in 08 with the Obamabots.

      Report Post »  
    • TheConstitutionMatters
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:32pm

      JustAngry, thanks for the link, I couldn‘t find a single bill I didn’t agree with. BluesGuitar have YOU checked it out or are you unable to research for your self. Ron Paul has the most consistent voting record of all members of congress.

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:52pm

      @blues guitar

      The founders warned us about not getting into “foreign entanglements” and it was even the party platform not so long ago.

      “The Republican Party maintains the traditional American policy of noninterference in the political affairs of other nations. This government has definitely refused membership in the League of Nations and to assume any obligations under the covenant of the League. On this we stand.” – from the Republican Party convention platform, 1928

      Basically what it comes down to is…your views on foreign policy are much closer to the views of Obama’s and the CFR, than they are to Washington, Jefferson, and Adams. That’s a simple fact you simply can not deny, and it’s obviously still not enough to wake you from your slumber.

      As for your position on drugs, perhaps you would like to be the first so called conservative to tell us just where they find the right for the Feds to dictate just what you are allowed to consume?

      Here‘s Jefferson’s position.

      “If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as a sorry state as the souls who live under tyranny.”
      Thomas Jefferson

      “I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society but the people themselves and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform them.”
      Thomas Jefferson

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • FROTHYDISCHARGE
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:59pm

      FREEMANLUVER isn’t it amazing that the paultards are the ONLY people that know anything about everything? OK put down the ganja and your male prostitute and pay attention. IF YOU PUT OUT A NEWS LETTER IN YOUR NAME YOU ARE ENDORSING IT. This is not guilt by association this is something sold with your freaking name on it. If you honestly believe he didn’t know what was in there YOU IS DUMB!!! even for a paulrod.
      The Constitution also doesn’t say that you can drive 90mph in a school zone, shoot at your neighbor’s house, nor doesn‘t it specifically say that you and Cause4Liberty can express your love in your neighbor’s yard but you can’t do these things because they intrude on the rights of others.
      Read this and tell me that society doesn’t need to regulate these things.

      http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/02/crack-fueled-kidnap-murder-of-montana-teacher-officials-say/
      Drug addicts need help otherwise they are a danger to society.
      Unfortunately RP will not win one state. Face it. You Paultards should really focus your energy on something else. I’ll bet you all would be good at Dungeons and Dragons.

      Report Post » FROTHYDISCHARGE  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:07pm

      @frothy. Your comments are about as dirty as your name. How’s that clap treating you? I agree with FreedomLuver. You have to resort to alinksy type tatics because you dont have ground to stand on. Newsletters you say! How progressive of you to play the race card! Btw, the newsletters are MINUSCULE, compared to Obama going to a racist church for 20 yrs, being married by a racist pastor, and flaunting race to win elections. But, nevertheless you indirectly join the Progressive team of Alinskites.

      I spelled jews, “joos,” because the blaze will not accept posts, majority of the time, with the correct spelling. Just like you have to say GB. If you think that is anti-semitic, you have a serious problem! The Clap has prolly worked its way into your progressive brain. Please, feel free to use my name in your perverted attempts at comedy. But, I dont find you funny, more like incompetent. I dont agree with 100% of Paul’s stances, but about 90%. Paul is NOT my savior, but IS my choice for POTUS.

      You “Never” cease to amaze me with your stupidity! Is that better!? Call the doctor to “re-up” the penicillin, so the clap doesnt work its way further into your brain!

      BTW, the prohibition laws WERE a direct result of Racism and fear mongering.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:17pm

      @frothy “Drug addicts need help otherwise they are a danger to society.”
      ——

      We’re from the Government, We’re here to help. Now here is some felonies and jail time. We’re helping you, now pay the fines and courts, then your lawyers, then well use you for slave labor to compensate society for your ‘crime.‘ Then just maybe you’ll be “cured” from your problems and drugg addiction.

      It perpetuates the problem and forces ‘recovering addicts’ back into the life of addiction, committing different crimes, or creates a life that is in-n-out of the Prison Industrial Complex.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:02pm

      @FROTHYDISCHARGE

      Let’s see, nothing but ridiculous ad hominem attacks followed by non sequiturs..eh?

      *sigh*

      Obviously you can’t come up with anything, in either something Paul wrote, stated publically, or voted on that would indicate that your illogical guilt by association tactic has a leg to stand on, so if you have such evidence…produce it, and I’ve already clearly stated he did a poor job of checking what others wrote for him.

      Thus far, all you have produced is pathetic demagoguery.

      Logic was never a strong suit for you…eh?

      Now once again…perhaps you will show us just where in the Constitution the Feds are allowed to have the power to determine just what you are permitted to consume?

      Laws that deal with traffic, theft, murder, ect. were ALL left to the states you simpleton, and that is why you can’t find what you so desperately seek in the Constitution, and that is why drug laws should be left to the states.

      You really have no use for what the founders set up…do you

      You may not be bright enough to grasp this, but you were actually trying to make the case for passing prohibition once again.

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:18pm

      FROTHYDISCHARGE: Minus the electioneering fraud Dr. Paul probably won Iowa and Maine.

      BTW, he’s in 2nd place with the Delegates.. We’ll see who has the last laugh. At least Paul supporters care enough about their Nation to get involve while you Neo-Cons really don’t believe the bs yourselves coming from your candidates. lol

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:43pm

      @Blues: First off, Google: School House Rock, “I’m just a bill”.

      Second, didn’t you listen to what Ron Paul said about earmarks? If money doesn’t get designated, it goes to the executive branch. So in order to prevent money from going to the executive branch to fund crap that we don’t need, Ron Paul appropriates it for his district, for the use of the people. Get a clue!!

      Report Post »  
  • MCLOVINIT
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:50pm

    Political Prayer:
    “It is January 20th, 2013.
    Rick Santorum is being sworn in as the new President of the United States.
    I give thanks to you Almighty God, for your blessings! Thank you, Lord.”
    I see it. I feel it. I believe it. It is so.

    Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:06pm

      Santorum? Was that the neocon guy who got the most boos in debate history ? lol

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • Look4DBigPicture
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:23pm

      I feel exactly the same way, MCLOVINIT. As I was watching the debate tonight, I kept thinking how Rick is the only honest candidate willing to admit his mistakes while offering very valid reasons for making some of his decisions. Unfortunately, he never got his momentum tonight and had a tendency to over-explain himself. (With that said – he still has my vote.)

      Ron Paul reduced himself to name calling and scowling while others spoke. He has a good message, but he’s a terrible messenger. He‘s been an absolute zero in the House by voting ’no’ on just about everything, which proves he’s incapable of being flexible. Clearly his rude goons were abundant in the audience … cheering him and booing everyone else (especially Santorum since all of his negative ads have been targeting Santorum)

      Although Gingrich had a good debate (big surprise) he still came across as smug. He simply has too much baggage for the Democrats to use against him.

      Tonight, Romney was a spotlight ‘ho’. Had I not watched all 20 debates, I might not have noticed how he monopolized all issues like an over eager child. Yes he won the debate, but it sounded to me like Romney was all about Romney … and not about us.

      Report Post »  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:54pm

      So when Peter cut the ear off the centurian and Jesus said war was not the answer…but now God”s answer is Rick Santorum as President cause he will bomb Iran. I was under the impression Israel would be save by God not the U.S. You know the whole Gideon you will know it’s God thing.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:07am

      @Look4DBigPicture Willing to admit his mistakes? I don’t believe in praising individuals for doing things they are suppose to do, especially if in Government. Granted, Santorum had some valid reasons for his decisions, but it‘s that kind of voting that has gotten us into the mess we’re in. Paul should work on his presentation skills, for as you said, his message is good. Flexible? Like passing TARP? Bailing out the auto industries? Passing No Child Left Behind? Raising the debt ceiling? I’m glad Paul has stuck to his guns and not given in to the Liberal and Progressive BS so abundant in Congress. His goons? I think the crowd was mostly Romney supporters, not Paul. Romney repeated almost everything he has said for the past 20 debates, and almost repeats the same things for every question. He couldn’t even answer the last question, without praising his ideas. He needs to be more original. I was surprised that all three Candidates were mentioning those positions most usually emphasized by Paul e.g. State rights, local decisions, public education, federal powers, etc.

      Report Post »  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:20pm

      Reality Check for McClueless:

      This
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tZO-zG7c4fs#!

      Not this
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TVoVqvt74

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
  • Br@dley
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:36pm

    he is a fake. and pro-choice.
    http://www.businessinsider.com/santorum-in-1995-i-was-basically-pro-choice-all-my-life-until-i-ran-for-congress-2012-2

    Report Post » Br@dley  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:47pm

      The politically educated individuals will vote for Ron Paul.

      He won this debate, hands down.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:49pm

      “Rick thinks he is Jesus Christ, I knew Jesus, he is no Jesus” Ron Paul.

      Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:52pm

      Question: Why is Dr Ron flying wing for Romney?

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:47pm

      Answer: Your question isn’t based in fact, so it cannot be answered. Proof please, isn’t that what all you liberals/atheists want, is proof?

      Report Post »  
  • Listen_then_think
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:35pm

    Romney is the only non politician, non washington insider up there. Romney is the only one without some lobbyist he is beholden to. Romney is the only one capable of fixing the economy, thats his job, that is what he does. The other guys all spend money. Romney makes businesses work. If you want to be just like Greece in 2 years, don’t vote for Romney.

    Report Post »  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:42pm

      you must be high.
      he is bought and paid for by wallstreet. just like obama.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • CatB
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:59pm

      You are mistaken .. Romney went to the feds for the Olympics and Romneycare .. he knows how to get pork!

      Report Post »  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:59pm

      Big Business in bed with Big Government is a Big Problem…yes?
      So lets put a Big Business man in charge of the Big Government…that will surly fix it.

      Report Post »  
    • TheConstitutionMatters
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:05pm

      Romney gets 90% of his donations from Wall Street Banks, I repeat 90%. The GOP establishment are pushing Romney. Even Satan’s disciple George Soros likes Mitt. If you want more of the same Romney’s your man.

      Report Post »  
  • ThePostman
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:34pm

    Here’s a question for all the guys except Ron Paul: “Why can’t you be more like him?”

    Report Post »  
  • Tree_Butcher
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:31pm

    Now there’s the pot calling the kettle black!
    No conservative patriot would ever even THINK of castrating our military in a time of war, much less surrender to the commie lib potheads that believe legalizing drugs will be a good thing for the country.
    Dr. Paul never had my vote to begin with just from these two positions, I cringe to think what else he has hidden behind his back if he has abandoned just these principles. If our choices this November are Paul and Obama, the nation is doomed.

    Report Post » Tree_Butcher  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:37pm

      cutting military spending doesn’t deminish the troops at all. you have obviously never been in the service or you would know first hand how much money is wasted.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • black9897
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:37pm

      @Tree Yeah right. Ron called him out. RP is the only one worth voting for. Ever done any research on drugs?? You’d find legalizing all drugs would actually DECREASE crime. You can let the Gov. control you, I choose freedom….true freedom.

      Report Post » black9897  
    • Jon
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:54pm

      @black9897 “Legalizing drugs would decrease crime”. Ya which is kinda circular reasoning, if there‘s no law to break anymore than obviously it’s not a crime. That’s like saying if we legalize murder, rape, and assault, then the violent crime rate would plummet.

      Report Post »  
    • Br@dley
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:58pm

      yeah, smoking a joint is exactly as egregious as rape and murder.

      way to go skippy.

      Report Post » Br@dley  
    • justangry
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:05pm

      @Jon Sigh… He doesn’t want to legalize drugs. He wants to stop the FEDERAL government from enforsing drug laws because that’s not how the founders envisioned it. All crimes were meant to legislated at the state level. As a matter of fact most of your drug laws today started when?…. anyone?… That’s right, during the PROGRESSIVE ERA!!! Along with temperance, and a move to limit other vices. When people want the government to push a social agenda, they are progressive.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • Tree_Butcher
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:05pm

      WRONG.
      I’m a Gulf War vet, enlisted in the Navy 3 days after we bombed Lybia, every man in my family has served in a war since we came to this country from Norway. What Dr. Paul wants to do to our military would leave us completely vulnerable to attack from our enemies, and in a time of war I would consider that Treason.
      No politician will allow our borders to be truly secured, they rely on the illegal vote too much, thus we have two choices: fight them over there or fight them here. Not fighting and not fighting to win only prolongs the problem.

      So you think defunding our military will solve what…?

      Report Post » Tree_Butcher  
    • glassaudioguy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:14pm

      You folks who think legalizing drugs is no big deal, do you really KNOW what it’s done to Dutch society? They’re so dissipated and just plain out of it they could be overrun by a banana republic if they had any nearby.

      Report Post »  
    • justangry
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:26pm

      @Tree_Butcher, Also a navy vet from the first oil war. I was there in 90 and 93. I agree with RP’s foreign policy, and don‘t think there’s anyone out there that would attack us head on, if we pulled back a little.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • black9897
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:41pm

      @ Jon. That’s not what I meant. People think that drugs cause rape, murder, etc, are incorrect, The numbers say different. Why do ppl who want drugs sometimes do bad things? Because it’s illegal, so they must go about illegal means to get drugs. Besides, at the very least drug possession should not be a “crime”, because there is no valid cause of action. Unlike murder and rape (which can’t compare, so not sure why you would even try to).

      Report Post » black9897  
    • TRILO
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:05pm

      I do not recall him ever saying he would diminish the military. The only thing I have heard him say is that he would stop getting involved in other countries internal issues. Our meddling sure has not done us much good over the past 20+ years maybe it is time we try a different approach. Heck we have been at war for over 10 years and I just read we now have troops in FOUR African countries on top of what we have in the middle east.

      As far as drugs… let me just say this. It is harder for kids to get alcohol, then for kids to get drugs except when kids are filled with mind altering drugs they get from their quack psychiatrists that pimp drugs like candy for ADHA, depression, anxiety, etc, etc. Why is it easier to get drugs? Because drugs are illegal and alcohol is legal. There is a drug dealer in every school and on darn near every street corner. Alcohol can only be sold by people with a license and one must show a valid i.d. card to purchase it. It is much easier for the state to monitor and regulate alcohol sales and to ensure the establishments are following the law. It is impossible to have enough cops or DEA agents to stop the illegal flow of drugs. The war on drugs has not decreased drug use nor has it reduced crime. Heck just look at the problems on our southern border. Has prohibition been so long ago that people have forgot the increase in crime due to the illegal sales of alcohol? Revisionist history strikes again.

      Report Post » TRILO  
    • colt1860
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:06pm

      @glassaudioguy It’s not about legalizing drugs (States can still ban, regulate or prohibit whatever they want). It’s about ENDING the drug cartels, gangs, rapes, street violence, robberies, illegal border crossings, bribes, human trafficking, and every other Al Capone and Scarface degenerates out there that depend on the ILLEGAL drug industry. That’s the HUGE difference. Look, people will still abuse drugs, whether legal or illegal. For example, Elvis Presley and Michael Jackson both died by legal drugs, BUT AT NO POINT were there any international drug cartels funding their abuse, or crack houses collecting money. It was administered through Doctors. Wherein the Government had much more power to control the use thereof, and punish those responsible for any abuse or illegal acts done thereby.

      Report Post »  
    • Mutiny
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:36pm

      @tree

      Thank you for your service to our country but I dont think you understand Ron Paul’s plan for the military.
      Yes he wants to cut our overseas wars which have bankrupt us and what have we gained? We have 900 bases in 130 countries, and now we find out Islamic terrorists are working in Mexico. We are not going to be attacked by a convention military. Russia, China, the rest of the world combined could try and our armed forces would beat them and throw them in the the sea. Our real threat is ourselves, by going broke and giving up our freedoms and turning into our enemies.

      Here are some facts about Ron Paul’s military plan.

      He cuts no defense.
      We are broke.
      We are spread out.
      We are tired.
      Ron Paul has said we will get rid of bases overseas but increase bases at home.
      We go back to 2004 military spending levels. Yes its up a trillion dollars since 2004.
      Even at 2004 levels we still will spend 4 times the next closest country (China).

      When we bring our troops home, we will still have aircraft carriers, the will not sit in docks. They will do rotations and have plenty of firepower to flex our muscle if we need to. Oh and IED dont work well against carriers at sea and planes at 15 thousand feet up. We dont need bases with B52s, f-35s, f-18s, and cruise missiles.

      Report Post » Mutiny  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:10am

      so if you smoke pot you are a commie lib.

      but if you kick someones door in,
      steal their stuff and sell it to the highest bidder to buy more cop toys to kick in more doors,
      and throw the pot smokers in jail with violent criminals that will rape them…thats what

      a freedom loving patriot?

      Report Post »  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 3:27am

      @Tree_Butcher – oh so you can pop pills and drink alcohol? Hypocrite , and Paul said the laws should be enforced by states, not the Federal Gov.

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:38am

      @Tree_Butcher
      No conservative patriot would ever even THINK of castrating our military in a time of war, much less surrender to the commie lib potheads that believe legalizing drugs will be a good thing for the country.
      —–
      True, but as you know Paul is no conservative, and certainly no patriot. Just a traitor wanting to replace another traitor. A power-hungry politician seizing the day. A cult leader who targets the young. Need I go on?

      Report Post »  
    • Hoosieratarian
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:43pm

      For some people thinking for yourself is too hard I guess.

      Can you clarify what legally declared war we are in the middle of again?

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:04pm

      @Kyptonite: Just make sure you’re there to be deployed to Iran when your boy gets into the White House. First in line, even.

      Report Post »  
  • Jimbo Wales
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:24pm

    Aahhahaha, oh wow.

    Ron Paul looked Santorum right in the face and called him out; Santorum couldn‘t even bring himself to look in Ron Paul’s direction.

    I’ll never understand why GB loves Santorum so much; such a fraud.

    Report Post » Jimbo Wales  
    • neverending
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:36pm

      Typical full blooded politician.

      Report Post »  
    • Maji
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:44pm

      Ron“Barney Fife”Paul
      Iran needs a nuclear bomb for respect!
      He isn‘t a fake he’s a real nut!

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:46pm

      Santorum is for localized and homeschooling, yet he voted multiple times to fatten the Department of Education.

      Santorum is a TOOL.

      Report Post »  
    • momsense
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:52pm

      He’s not senile like Paul.

      Report Post »  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:32am

      Santorum reminded me of bevis and ********

      Courage uhhhhhhhh uhhhhhhh

      remember that one debate with Bachman and Santorum going at it…I‘m more courageous no I’m the courageous one
      no I have more courage than you
      no you don”t I’m more courageous.

      I’ve found the people with real courage don”t have to tell people they’re courageous.

      Report Post »  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:58am

      really You’ve never heard of bevis and ******** you know the cartoon

      Report Post »  
  • jkdblaze
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:23pm

    Not in a million years would I ever vote for Paul. What’s he trying to prove? He doesn’t stand a snowballs chance in hell of will this primary. What an idiot!

    Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:29pm

      You’ll vote for whomever the GOP nominates.

      Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:00pm

      JKO the JOKE will be on you when he is your President…

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • doyley64
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:22pm

      Tree Butcher

      Out of these candidates, Santorum is the only one I would willingly follow.

      ***************************?************

      We don’t need more followers, we need leaders! So get off your a$$ and start leading the charge for FREEDOM and LIBERTY instead of being one of the SHEEP. BAHAHAH!

      Report Post »  
  • NILAP
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:16pm

    Only Santorum or Romney will get the nomination. You attack Santorum you are for Romney. You attack Romney you are for Santorum. You attack both you are for Obama.

    Report Post » NILAP  
  • aragona
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:15pm

    Let’s face it, Paul will not be the nominee. What would people think of a Santorum/Paul ticket? Winner?

    Report Post »  
    • SychinLegacy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:19pm

      No way will I vote for a progressive establishment republican even if he picks Paul as VP. Paul can‘t do anything realistically from the VP slot so it’s just a way to try and win over the semi-libertarian crowd. This year it’s libertarian or bust.

      Report Post » SychinLegacy  
    • janedough1
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:27pm

      Glad to know Sychinlegacy is supporting Obama.

      Report Post »  
    • justangry
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:36pm

      @JaneDough, Glad to know you’re supporting the NDAA and Patriot Act.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:09pm

      Haha… no way in hell would Ron Paul veep for Santorum.

      Report Post »  
  • SychinLegacy
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:14pm

    There’s only way to save this nation. We need a libertarian. We need someone who echos the founding father’s visions. We need a custodian of the constitution. What Ron Paul’s haters fail to realize is that this is not just about Ron Paul. It’s a libertarian revolution. We are tired of being ignored while the progressives on both sides of the aisle crash us faster and further down this oblivion spiral. And we will NOT settle for a “REAL CONSERVATIVE” who panders and lies as he steals our future away. We will NOT settle for ANOTHER expansion of this already too large global pseudoempire. We will NOT settle for the other three in this race. So either join our side and save this country by electing a libertarian. Or go ahead with your “REAL CONSERVATIVE” Ricky Bobby over there, lose to Obama, and cry “WOE IS US” as our economy collapses.

    Now or Never friends. Ron Paul 2012.

    Report Post » SychinLegacy  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:20pm

      follow the constitution or get out of the way…

      Report Post » Razorhunters  
    • janedough1
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:23pm

      There will be no human savior. If you expect that just electing Ron Paul would solve all our problems, you are deluding yourself. Ron Paul can’t fix everything. Our government and our people are rotten from top to bottom. We need to turn over every office in the land. And Ron Paul is 77 years old. The odds are pretty good that he wouldn’t live out a term. He is at the end of the average life expectancy now. He’s older than Reagan was when he left office. If he managed to survive four years in the White House, do you really think he’d have the energy to fight every battle that needs to be fought to save this nation? What do you think he is? Hiding a cape and tights under that suit? If you want to save this country, I hope you are working as hard on turning out your congressman, senator, state government and local government as you are on getting Ron Paul elected, or we are all toast. Get rid of Obama, and we’ve still got Reid, Pelosi, Al Franken and thousands of other crooks at all levels of government.

      Report Post »  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:28pm

      does not have to be a savior …just need the right direction.

      Report Post » Razorhunters  
    • glassaudioguy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:26pm

      The problem with RP is the majority of his followers. We had one show up at our precinct caucuses a few weeks ago and he thought the federal government should get out of the marriage business. Excuse me? Is that the best you can do??!! When marriage can be any combination of two or more people the definition becomes meaningless. Just look at the nations which have legalized same sex marriage- the marriage rates have fallen off the charts and their societies are going to hell in a handbasket. If RP wants to get back to the Constitution, he’d also better emphasize what John Adams said about it being suitable only for a “moral and religious people. It is wholly unsuited to the governing of any other.” One thing our founders realized that we have forgotten is a strong family is imperative to a strong nation. Legalizing drugs, same sex marriage and prostitution will come with a higher price than any libertarian is willing to acknowledge.

      Report Post »  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:55am

      This is what baffles me about Glenn Beck.
      He describes Ron Paul to a tee then endorses Bachman.
      Now Bachman’s done, Instead of Paul It’s Santorum.
      When Santorum’s done it won”t be Paul it will be Romney.
      I can hardly listen to Glenn anymore…I’m finding him less and less truthfull.
      Bearing false witness about Ron Paul will be his down fall.
      People like me were his bread and butter.
      But Question with boldness remember.
      Ron Paul is the closest we will get, in this day and age to George Washington.
      Ron Paul is the only one that will budge the Overton window back towards Liberty.
      You talk a good talk Glenn Beck
      But I think it is just talk.

      Report Post »  
    • Jeff65
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 5:04pm

      @glassaudioguy It is not just the position of Ron Paul’s supporters. It is the position of Ron Paul that the feds should get out of marriage. As a Christian, I hold a high regard for marriage . . . as an institute given to us by God. That is exactly why I want the government of all levels out of marriage. I don’t want to have my mariage contract with anyone else except between my wife and God.

      What is it with people that think the government should have there fingers in everything? What value do they offer in getting involved in my marriage?

      Just because I have my views as such, does that mean I should want the government to force that on everyone else? Homosexuality is disgusting, but I think the gays should be able to do what ever they want. Just don’t give them any special priveleges to do so, and keep away from me and my family.

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:13pm

      @Jane: You don’t think for a moment that maybe serving in the office would energize Dr. Paul? You presume a little too much.

      Report Post »  
  • Razorhunters
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:11pm

    ask about barry’s e-verify ss# 042-68=4425

    Report Post » Razorhunters  
  • Never Offended
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:09pm

    Whether you agree with Ron Paul’s views or not, you can’t deny that he is the most consistent guy up there. You can call him a crazy old man, but you can’t call him a flip flopper.

    Report Post » Never Offended  
    • smokeysmoke
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:11pm

      i like ron paul… but isent he that guy who slips in more spending into bills than any other representative, but then votes NO, on the bill… how can he call santorum fake, and not stand on his principal, and attach as few ear marks as possible, and then vote no

      Report Post » smokeysmoke  
    • SychinLegacy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:18pm

      You are completely misinformed. The earmarks you’re talking about is money that has ALREADY been spent by Congress. That means that no matter how hard you fight it, that money is already gone and if you don’t spend it someone else will. Ron Paul fights the spending as far as he can, but when it gets to the point where it’s already gone he has to fulfill his sworn duty to bring that money back to his district.

      It’s like if your wife said “HONEY I’M SPENDING 1000 DOLLARS RIGHT NOW” and you say hell no but like most wives she doesn’t listen. She then asks you, do you want to spend 500 of that on a new TV before she spends all 1000 of it on new shoes? Of course you say yes because you’d rather get that TV if the money is already gone otherwise she just went and wasted 1000 dollars on shoes. Now it’s only 500. Still a bad loss, but much better than it would have been.

      Report Post » SychinLegacy  
    • Listen_then_think
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:29pm

      Not a flip flopper but he does want it both ways. He does that by voting “no” on a bill he knows will pass so he loads it up with earmarks for himself. That way he can say I voted no on that and yet he gets all the money earmarked from it without worrying about how to pay for it or where its coming from. Paul does that over and over and over. That is not flip flopping you are right, that is dishonest. And it is not fiscally responsible if he is loading bills with earmark money because he is adding to the dog pile of debt NOT reducing it.

      Report Post »  
    • Mitchm999
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:50pm

      Good point, never offended. Charles manson is not a flip flopper either. He has always been completely consistent.

      Report Post » Mitchm999  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 6:06am

      @SychinLegacy
      The earmarks you’re talking about is money that has ALREADY been spent by Congress… Ron Paul fights the spending as far as he can, but when it gets to the point where it’s already gone he has to fulfill his sworn duty to bring that money back to his district.

      It’s like if your wife said “HONEY I’M SPENDING 1000 DOLLARS RIGHT NOW” and you say hell no but like most wives she doesn’t listen. She then asks you, do you want to spend 500 of that on a new TV before she spends all 1000 of it on new shoes?
      ———
      Wrong analogy. The TV was your idea, not hers. It’s more like all these pervs gang up on a girl (America) and rape her over and over again while you watch (since you belong to the gang). Then when they are done raping her, you rationalize, “What the heck, they already raped her, so I might as well have me some too.”

      Paul CONSISTENTLY (you need to be “consistent” to brainwash people) disassociates himself from his political party, his position, and his fellow workers. For example, he repeatedly disparages Congress, and refers to its members as “they” or “them” as a ploy to deceive naive minds into thinking he doesn’t belong to the gang, but he does, very much so. Congressman Paul actually feeds off “their” corruption, like the despicable leech that he is. Perfect Paul is a fake, and like Obama’s hope and change, his “revolution,” is all an illusion.

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 24, 2012 at 4:37am

      @Krypt: At least Ron Paul would rather have the money go back to the people of his district, instead of going to the executive branch for undeclared wars, foreign aid and nation building. The earmarks are to designate what goes where… if money isn’t earmarked, it goes to Obama. Ron Paul again would rather vote against Obama & Co. (nefariously) getting any more of the tax payers’ money than is absolutely necessary. So yes, he earmarked bills he didn’t vote for. At least it didn’t go to Planned Parenthood, or the Bridge to Nowhere. Or (dramatic chipmunk moment) Obama.

      Report Post »  
  • EndTheFedNOW
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:56pm

    No candidate can come close to Ron Pauls fiscal policy. No candidate can come close to Ron Paul who was talking about the econmic mess way before it came around. Ron Paul is the man who can fix our economy. You might not like his foregn policy (thats fine) but you cant sit here and tell me ANYONE running for POTUS is better at understading our economic mess. And thats what the real threat is. Not some stupid crazy muslims.

    Ron Paul 2012

    Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • MammalOne
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:02pm

      Period.

      Report Post » MammalOne  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:08pm

      Every real American will be voting our Constitution..the question is..how many real Americans are in America today?

      Report Post »  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:12pm

      bing , bing , bing …we have a winner.

      Report Post » Razorhunters  
    • 13th Generation American
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:15pm

      I’m a real American and I agree with his foreign policy.

      Report Post » 13th Generation American  
    • mils
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:16pm

      he is not going to get the nomination, period.

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 24, 2012 at 4:47am

      What’s that? Romney‘s got 93 delegates to Ron Paul’s 82? What? Newt and Shamtorum choking in the dust? I thought so. Maine still needs to declare a winner, and will do so on March 10th. They are still counting up there, and Ron Paul is picking up votes. The thing about Ron Paul, is that he knows his supporters will hold his feet to the fire on the issues… except that, Ron Paul holds his own feet there too. Do any of the other candidates do that? Of course not. Does Obama? Nope. Ron Paul’s supporters are energized, not because he makes them feel good… they’ve chosen their champion.. Why do you think Ron Paul always thanks everyone, at his rallies, for inviting him to their revolution? He knows he’s not singular in his thinking. Obama better manufacture the cause for Martial Law quick, if he plans on staying. Ron Paul‘s not the only who’s dangerous.

      Report Post »  
  • ThePostman
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:56pm

    Anyone who cares about the constitution will be voting for Ron Paul in the general election this year. The rest of you GOP and DEM sheeples are all just itching to be in hell with a miserable excuse for a president. Enjoy your fleecing.

    Report Post »  
    • SFYMP
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:51am

      All freedom loving real Americans will be voting for Ron Paul. It’s our only chance to remain America, all you anti-paulbots and sheeple better wake up and fly right. The other three are hacks.

      Report Post »  
  • NORTHBRO
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:54pm

    most politicians are actors, they act out the part their target demographic looks for. Unfortunately Ron isn’t a flip flopper. and wont change his mind on foreign policy, and that’s his main hang up. However, if he was elected,(if) I doubt he would be as radical on changing policy, congress, the people, and the military wouldn’t just let him make dramatic changes, and I do feel there needs to be some changes how ever. I think I’d still vote for him…

    Report Post » NORTHBRO  
    • ThePostman
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:59pm

      The military is begging for him to be elected. They know that we are wasting their precious assets with foolish outlays and foolish wars. The military wants to protect us, not go protect Kuwaiti oil refineries (as they are presently doing).

      I know Ron Paul – he will be steadfast in his beliefs and actions just as he always has. He WILL NOT move left, like all the others.

      That’s worth accepting a different foreign policy response than you might desire. I mean, C’mon, do you really think any of those other clowns will attack Iran? NEVER. At least Ron Paul says he wouldn’t, and he wouldn’t. He is the ONLY one telling the truth on this matter. Doesn’t the truth mean anything to anyone anymore?

      Report Post »  
    • MammalOne
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:08pm

      I was under the impression it‘s good he doesn’t “flip flop” on issues. You may not agree with some things he supports but at least you know his stance. People who “flip flop” based on the “political climate” generated by the mainstream media are much more dangerous. You could love them because they say they love everything you do but once it‘s not popular and won’t get them elected, they’ll switch up positions against you.

      I‘d rather disagree on some things with someone and trust they’re being genuine than completely agree with someone but not be able to trust their claims.

      Report Post » MammalOne  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:11pm

      Yep…that foriegn policy is a real bugger..we have been fighting on the behalf of Muslims for years now..It’s because of the oil that they own us..have infiltrated out country and our government and educational system and are skyrocketing fuel prices to collapse the world.. we need to keep fighting for them.

      Report Post »  
  • Razorhunters
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:52pm

    Dr. Paul speaks the truth…

    mittens…get serious , he is obama white…

    Report Post » Razorhunters  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:59pm

      Exactly brother. Mittens the ken doll is the white Obama. But dont tell these people, or else youll be a crazy racist or something

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:05pm

      aye , true …is sad.

      Report Post » Razorhunters  
  • UBETHECHANGE
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:51pm

    No candidate can come close to Ron Paul’s fiscal conservative record, that is true. I just can‘t get past Ron’s foreign policy.

    Report Post »  
    • 0ld5t0ner
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:16am

      Don”t you get it
      There will be no foreign policy without hard core fiscal reform.
      Hard core Dave Ramsey Total money Makeover fiscal reform.
      It has to be done by a one term President, not one looking to get reelected.
      Dr Ron Paul is the solution.
      He is to old for 2 terms so he can focus on fixing.
      That is the Truth.

      Report Post »  
    • SFYMP
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:59am

      old5toner I agree.Truth seems to hurt too many dimbulbs like this. I’m stunned by the absolute lack of comprehension of the real facts when presented repeatedly. The truth isn’t reality to sheeple. Their reality is one block over from libville, it seems to be sepia tone in color.

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 24, 2012 at 4:50am

      Love Dave Ramsey. “Better than I deserve” No truer statement has ever been uttered.

      Report Post »  
  • Neils60
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:51pm

    For a guy, who still can‘t and won’t tell the truth about his involvement in his “newsletters”, to state that Santorum is a “fake” is a perfect example of out and out hypocrisy.

    Report Post »  
    • SychinLegacy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:07pm

      You means those newsletters debunked 20 years ago?

      Report Post » SychinLegacy  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:18pm

      Even if he had known about the content of the newsletters whoa..“Politically Incorrect” I could give a rats hiney about political correctness. Paul delivered an interracial couples baby a long time ago. He was the only one who would even wait on them..the baby was still born and he sent them a bill paid in full..He also had a black staffer working for him..there is nothing racist about that man..

      Report Post »  
  • 70S_KIDS_FIGHTING_SOCIALISM
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:48pm

    Ron Paul is the phony trying to create the false perception that he has a consensus by paying college students $20 hr to flood popular blogs like this one. That is lying & cheating when the student doesn’t believe what they say and has to get PAID to do it.

    TEA PARTY UNTOUCHABLES!!!!!!!!!!

    Report Post » 70S_KIDS_FIGHTING_SOCIALISM  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:58pm

      “Ron Paul is the phony trying to create the false perception that he has a consensus by paying college students $20 hr to flood popular blogs like this one”

      LOL and the nocons call us the conspicary theroies. Got ANY evidence to back that up buddy? I doubt it. Your talking out your blowhole.

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:00pm

      Any evidence at all buddy?

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • Razorhunters
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:11pm

      insane…

      Report Post » Razorhunters  
    • smokeysmoke
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:14pm

      i think your accusing ron paul of using an OWS tactic… i mean we all know THE HUFF POST PAYS PEOPLE TO MAKE THEIR COMMENT SECTION LOOK LIKE THEY HAVE ALOT OF PEOPLE IN AGREEMENT, AND THEN COME TO THE BLAZE AND SAY STUPID STUFF… i dont think ronpaul is doing this

      Report Post » smokeysmoke  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:25pm

      That sounds like Obama methodology to me…Paul is for real..the kids are for real..they are taking matters into their own hands in place of letting the establishment hand them over to red cool aid or blue cool aid..they are going for the real deal.. There is no one giving Paul coverage.. People that love this country and who aren’t afraid of going back to its roots..are voting Ron Paul..My friend the General from World War 11 will be voting Paul..so will my mom and i am proud of the young people having the courage and the fortitude to spread the word.. Go Constitution lovers!!!…FREEDOOM FOR ALL!!!

      Report Post »  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:42pm

      @70skidsfightingsocialism

      Ron Paul Pays people to endorse them ???

      What a ridiculous unfounded statement.

      Paul doesn’t need to pay people.

      People want a repeal of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

      People want the end of the EPA, IRS, Federal Reserve PRIVATE BANK, DHS, TSA, the Patriot Act and much more.

      People want an American Currency based on Gold, Silver and other limited natural resources.

      We want our original dejure representative government and want to abolish this de facto
      CORPORATION owned by the Global Elite.

      People want out of the United Nations “Club”.

      And then there are people like you.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • EndTheFedNOW
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:07pm

      And then there are people like you…

      Report Post » EndTheFedNOW  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 4:23pm

      Ron Paul IS the GrandFather and innovator of the original Tea Party. It must really pain you and those like you that so many of us want the Constitution and not retribution.

      Blowback, it’s all over your chin.

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 24, 2012 at 5:00am

      “Ron Paul is the phony trying to create the false perception that he has a consensus by paying college students $20 hr to flood popular blogs like this one. That is lying & cheating when the student doesn’t believe what they say and has to get PAID to do it.”

      If they don’t agree, why don’t they quit? I mean, they would be horrible salespersons, otherwise. I would never choose to stay in a job promoting a person/service/product if I didn’t believe in it, and believe it was for the good of the person I was trying to sell to. (i.e. car and insurance sales are good examples)

      “Oh man… I can‘t believe I’m getting paid $20 an hour(almost THREE TIMES MINIMUM WAGE in some cases)in promoting the campaign of someone I fundamentally cannot agree with. This is such a ****** job… why am I even here? Oh, it’s $20 an hour…”

      Report Post »  
  • Ch
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:48pm

    Santorum is scary and
    Romney is grease ball slimy phoney/

    Report Post »  
    • chewfatlip
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:46pm

      And Paul is just plain nuts.

      Report Post »  
    • Tree_Butcher
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:07pm

      @Chew: BINGO!

      Report Post » Tree_Butcher  
    • justangry
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:41pm

      Dang Tree_Butcher. What were you in the nav anyway? A boatswain’s mate?

      Report Post » justangry  
    • SFYMP
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:08am

      Just angry, the tree ain’t a veteran. He’s one of those twenty dollar an hour hores like the seventies something troll above. Real vets don’t talk like that. Real vets love their country and constitution. You can tell a troll by what they regurgitate, talking points from pravda. What sheople!

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 24, 2012 at 5:05am

      @Chew: And that assumption is based off what?

      Gotta love the anti-Paul sentiment from both establishments.. based on “clever” one-liners and all they do is just ape each other over and over again. Senile, Nuts… Is that all you’ve got? Seriously? And Ron Paul supporters are the ones being called stupid… What oxymorons.

      Report Post »  
  • GoodStuff
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:47pm

    They’re both fakes…and both clowns. Neither one can beat Obama. Romney at least has a basic understanding of the economy and a chance to beat Hussein.

    Report Post »  
  • KeithOlberdink
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:46pm

    Romney for President.

    http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-02-22.html

    Report Post » KeithOlberdink  
  • SychinLegacy
    Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:44pm

    Way to go Dr. Paul! Call him out and watch him squirm!

    Report Post » SychinLegacy  
    • Theleftisda
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:59pm

      Someone getting 3% of the national vote should not throw rocks in a glass house

      Report Post » Theleftisda  
    • SychinLegacy
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:05pm

      And when exactly has Ron Paul not be fiscally conservative again? I mean you do know that that’s what that expression means. Oh wait that’s right. Like he said he’s NEVER been a spender. Maybe Ricky boy should come clean.

      Report Post » SychinLegacy  
    • tzion
      Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:17pm

      For someone who isn’t a spender his district receives a lot of earmarks. Face it, not even Ron Paul is perfect. Every candidate has flaws and we have to decide which flaws we’re most willing to live with.

      Report Post »  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 24, 2012 at 5:07am

      @Tzion: Please read the nature of earmarks and spending in bills. Or listen, for once, to Ron Paul’s explanation of how funds are appropriated for different things before making ignorant statements.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love