Homophobic Rant? Former SNL Star Victoria Jackson Slams ‘Glee’
- Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:11pm by
Emily Esfahani Smith
- Print »
- Email »
In a column for WorldNetDaily.com, conservative comedian Victoria Jackson had a provocative reaction to the latest episode of Glee, the hit TV show about high school outcasts who find social solace singing and dancing together.
The show is peppered with gay themes–in last week’s episode, for instance, two gay characters exchanged a long-awaited kiss.
Jackson writes:
Did you see “Glee” this week? Sickening! And, besides shoving the gay thing down our throats, they made a mockery of Christians – again! I wonder what their agenda is? Hey, producers of “Glee” – what’s your agenda? One-way tolerance?
Liberal websites like the Huffington Post are calling Jackson’s remarks a “homophobic rant”–which is perhaps an overstatement. Her comments could be interpreted as criticism of Glee’s overt political themes, which are far left and politically correct.
The HuffPo is also denouncing what it calls her “anti-Muslim and Arab diatribe” from the same column. Her offending paragraph appears below:
This new al-Qaida magazine for women has beauty tips and suicide-bomber tips! Gimme a break! That is as ridiculous as two men kissing on the mouth! And I don’t care what is politically correct. Everyone knows that two men on a wedding cake is a comedy skit, not an “alternate lifestyle”! There I said it! Ridiculous!
Jackson is an active member of the tea party.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 695 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 508 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 353 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 341 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 328 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 328 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 341 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 252 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 328 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (375)
MoreCowbell
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:46pmYou know what would be a good idea? If you’re going to be calling yourself a Christian, at least learn how to read your bible rightly. It’s called hermaneutics. Time for so-called Christians to start actually learning what it means to be a Christian: a Christ-follower. That’s what a Christian is. So if you are going to get offended by the hard truths of the bible, maybe you’d better get into it a little more and try to understand it. You aren’t being a very good friend by not telling your gay friends the truth. You are only withholding valuable, life saving information from them. Love them by hating their sin. If they turn away from you for telling them the truth, then maybe they’re not such good friends.
conservativemom99
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:44pmGood for her…freedom of speech…well….it’s only freedom of speech if you agree…otherwise, it’s homophobia or racism or…insert insulting remark here…
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 5:12amIt’s freedom of speech and homophobia, and saying that it’s homophobia is freedom of speech too.
Report Post »Pezman
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 10:41amI’m with both of you on this one. It is both homophobic and a 1st amendment right. It’s also a 1st amendment right to point out the homophobia. It is, however, important to take note of the staggering double standard of ‘the left,’ on these type issues.
Report Post »It comes down to this. Many on the left hold someone like Larry Flint up as a hero of the first amendment. He is not. He is simply, someone I must endure IF I wish to keep my own freedom of speech intact.
Exrepublisheep
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:43pmHmmm. I’m really looking to disagree with Victoria. Hmmm. Nope, can’t.
Report Post »cologoddess
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:41pmI like this – READ IT! http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-gay-christian
Report Post »Tnredneck
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:10pmNo thanks, I would rather read Gods word. In no way would I ever be mean or discriminate against a gay person. Or even shove my lifestyle down their throats. So if it’s ok I will keep my preference for a woman in the privacy of my bedroom where it belongs. If every one including gays do that than we will not have to discuss this
Report Post »MoreCowbell
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:11pmI read it. This person has spent a lot of time twisting scripture to justify his “lifestyle”. It’s kind of sad, really. They have a wrong understanding of God’s word and they are leading others into their deceptions.
Report Post »thdream
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:34pmThis is an interesting essay, but not good hermeneutics. The primary point is one of cultural evolution and moral relativism, in the sense that morals are based on cultural norms not transcendent truth. Simply put, this author is saying that we do not study the bible to determine truth but to understand our reality. Truth is not absolute or is unknown so we need to be soft on any absolute language. That still does not answer my question, do you believe that NT theology teaches that homosexuality is acceptable, or as the author weakly tries to purport that it (The New Testament) is mostly silent on the issue?
Report Post »ottodiedacktick
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:35pm@COLOGODDESS
Do you think everyone on this blog would be happy if Glee had filmed a scene of a male transexual kissing a female? It would look like a lesbian scene, but it would be a heterosexual scene. This new world is getting confusing. It’s all part of the New World Odor. I’ve been told.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:10pmTnredn
People who don’t have a problem with perverted lifestyles are the real problem. You know, ” all evil needs to conquer is for good men to do nothing. Hell that seems to be you.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:13pmThdream
Hell you speak like a well read Fool. Could you please tone the hi faluting down and speak like you would if you were talking to a human. Do you really talk like that. What bull sh.t.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:16pmotto
What an insult that the only difference between a man and a woman is surgery and hormones. A man can never be a woman and vice versa.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:02pm2 Peter 3…………..
Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
Report Post »ottodiedacktick
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 12:18am@PC BE DAMNED
I never said, or believe, that there is no difference between the genders that a little surgery couldn’t fix. However, I do believe that you think you‘re a mind reader and I can guarantee that you’re not very effective at it. I voted in favor of defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman, but it doesn’t mean that I am against civil unions for two consenting adults with limits. In other words, I believe in traditional marriage.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 12:54amEphesians 6:12
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
Romans 12:14
Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse.
Romans 12:17,18
Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.
Ephesians 4:2
Be completely humble and gentle
Philippians 4:5
Let your gentleness be evident to all.
Titus 3:2
Report Post »to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and always to be gentle toward everyone.
Ye Must B Born Again
Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:32amhttp://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-gay-christian
MARK 12:18-27
If a man dies childless, his widow is ordered by biblical law to have intercourse with each of his brothers in turn until she bears her deceased husband a male heir. So reads the homosexuality-bible-gay-christian.
The REAL TRUE Gospel of MARK 12:18-27 reads thus:
Mark 12:18-27 KJV
18Then come unto him the Sadducees, which say there is no resurrection; and they asked him, saying,
19Master, Moses wrote unto us, If a man’s brother die, and leave his wife behind him, and leave no children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
20Now there were seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and dying left no seed.
21And the second took her, and died, neither left he any seed: and the third likewise.
22And the seven had her, and left no seed: last of all the woman died also.
23In the resurrection therefore, when they shall rise, whose wife shall she be of them? for the seven had her to wife.
24And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?
25For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.
26And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?
27He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err.
That gay bible is a perversion of the Bible is printed by perverts for perverts.
Hebrews 9:27And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Genesis2:24Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Leviticus 22:31Therefore shall ye keep my commandments, and do them: I am the LORD.
2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 KJV
Report Post »10And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
capitalideals
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:40pmI have never had a problem with whatever sexual lifestyle a person happens to have, but it’s crossed over into being forced into admiring it. Overt displays of public affection are not good, hetero or homosexual. Geezus, what happened to old fashioned self restraint?
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:40pmYes, the left is beyond hypocritical. I was a blogger on HuffingtonPost, making sure beforehand what their “rules” were and they specifically stated they welcomed ALL ideas and did not discriminate because of ideology, political party, etc. I watched & “learned”…..even though it wasn’t much of a surprise but confirmation. My friends & family have most always been Conservatives so I didn’t know too much about the “other side”. Sure enough…..the gross, sometimes threatening, nasty comments from the left mostly stayed on while the Conservative/Repub/Tea Party people who didn’t use any foul language, etc. were “deleted” and “banned”. While some of the libs would state they were “open minded” – they clearly….weren’t. And even more frightening is that they seemed to be sincerely unaware of this. Indeed – they‘d comment on why couldn’t the “moderators” delete all these “trolls”. Why were we the “trolls”? We were stating what we believe to be facts in a respectful way…not just to irritate, but to hopefully enlighten someone. But they don’t want that. They just wanted to come there & hear those that agreed with them in order to “reaffirm” themselves & feel good about it and vent their hatred. Yes, it was always Christians (while giving the Muslims a pass) & Jews, “righties”. Their downright hatred was frightening. Yes, Jackson is right and more of us should be standing up and express our feelings (with respect) & not be intimidated. Good for her!
Report Post »Dale
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:59pmIn his book, ‘Bias’, Bernie Goldberg explains that these leftist/progressives truly believe that EVERYONE thinks the way they do – only a small, extreme radical fringe group do not. The question I have, is why are they so virulent? If you know you are with the majority, you let the small ‘uninformed’ group have their say and move on. The left/socialists/progressives/communists want to silence anyone not agreeing with them. They don’t want to discuss or debate – they want to silence – yet they proclaim their open-minded inclusivity. The blind leading the blind and the deaf preaching to the deaf.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:07pmDale
Report Post »There are those who see themselves as the overseers of the heard and the remainder are the herd, ie steaks on the plates of the overseer.
Dick Blitskreig
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:39pmWho…cares…
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:04pmI care Mr, no balls. You are presenting yourself as an ignorant fool. We family types who have built great civilizations are highly resentful of those who prey upon our children. I care. I CARE.
Report Post »million
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:37pmHey, that Victoria is alright in my book. A gal that don’t back down when the going gets tough. Hollywood has has a megaphone the size of Obama’s ego in which they try to force their twisted and corrupt values onto the rest of the world. What rips them the most is their losing the battle on a daily basis and its driving them crazier than they already are .
Report Post »MoreCowbell
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:37pmThank you, Victoria. It‘s refreshing to hear someone say what I’m usually thinking about what my kids are exposed to these days on tv. You want to be gay? Fine, be gay. But don’t expect everyone to just sit back and quietly accept that your sexual perversion should be mainstream. Sodomy is not what God intended.
Report Post »mrsmileyface
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:36pmBRAVO! Victoria Jackon!!!! If they dont like us using our 1st amend. rights then perhaps it would be ok if I balled it up and shoved it up their homosexual ______. Perhaps that would be enjoyable to them. On second thought Ill continue to NOT watch shows like Glee in the first place. Its getting to the point that I will no longer have the need to purchase cable because its coming to down to only 2 things I watch Fox News and the Weather Channel. And I can get both from the internet.
Report Post »338lapua
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:32pmAnd the weather channel STILL does the climate change nonsense! I replaced it with the Food Network, weather on the internet.
Report Post »mingfurecon
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:32pmYeah, go get em!. It’s refreshimg to hear someone actually speak the truth once in a while. I am not afraid of something just because I don’t like it and I doubt she is either. Do we have to constantly prostrate ourselves to every bloody muslim, gay, illegal alien, and union drone that we happen to have a difference of opinion with? This is the USA for crying out loud.
Report Post »Echad
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:39pmIf you have a difference of opinion with a leftist you’re labeled a hate monger or some type of phobic and of course a racist it’s the only arguments they have!
Report Post »Dale
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:49pmor a conspiracy theorist!
Report Post »jarasan
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:32pmVictoria Jackson is awesome.
Report Post »crackerone
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:35pmPretty sure if I heard the term glee, ………….someone would trying to pass a three dollar bill!
Report Post »JbTuffGirl
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:32pmPop culture will teach your children what to believe if parents don’t step up and do it themselves. It starts in the home. The only fair thing to ask, would be that networks and producers give the same degree of compassion and tolerance to all groups of people. The mischaracterization of Christians and Tea Party members is as cruel and thoughtless as the mischaracterization of homosexuals or the transgendered. The hypocrisy of producers simply nullifies any positive impact the message of gay rights could have accomplished. You may appease one group, but you just frustrate and anger the other. This seems contrary to the overall message or goal, which is compassion for all, even if you don’t agree with one another.
Report Post »Dale
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:47pmJbTuffGirl;
The last I heard gl??? make up approximately 10 percent of the population (I’ve also heard that this is a very high estimate). If you do not have an agenda, why would you offend the 90 plus percent? It simply does not make sense.
Report Post »Echad
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:29pmLev 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination.
Report Post »TxGold
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:36pmAmen!!
Report Post »Cherynn
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:38pmJudge not, and ye shall not be judged. Same book I think.
Report Post »Echad
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:01pmCHERYNN:
Report Post »I’m not judging anyone! Their actions bring G-ds judgment down upon themselves.
Echad
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:13pmChrist does not condemn our “forming an opinion” of the conduct of others, for it is impossible “not” to form an opinion of conduct that we know to be evil.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:51pmCherry
I judge homosexuality as a grevious sin that if you attach yourself to it you will be destroyed when sin is finally destroyed and therefore if I commit homosexual acts I too will be guilty of grevious sin. Your little statement carries no weight with those who read the Bible. It only has power with the ignorant.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:33pm@ CHERYNN………….Let’s just go to the scripture you are alluding to and see if it stands up to your use of it. This is the full context of the verse.
1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
If you read the whole thing you will see that the teaching is obviously discussing hypocrisy not judging as you have stated it. Hence in the last sentence Jesus says when the log has been removed from your own eye you can then see clearly that you may remove the speck from your brother’s eye. The following verses occur just a few sentences later…………
15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn-bushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
How might I watch out for false prophets if I am not evaluating and Judging them? The verse you tried to use and how you tried to use it is probably the most abused and misused verse in the entire Bible in the US today.
Report Post »Cherynn
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 10:10pmEveryone in this country is entitled to thier own beliefs. Just like I dont want islam forced down my throat, I dont want other people beliefs forced on me. If people would just live thier own lives and not worry about how others are living thier lives we might have a different country. Live and let live, respect others. What some one else does in the privacy of thier own bedroom is no business of anyone else. Everyone needs someone to love and be loved by. Gay people have as much right to exsist in America as anyone else. ITS CALLED FREEDOM. If you want to force your beliefs on someone else, your just as bad as the taliban.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 10:35pm@ CHERYNN…………They certainly do have a right to exist ( I don’t think I have read anyone who suggested otherwise although they might have since I have not read every post), but the responses to this story are not because they kept it in the bedroom as you suggest, but rather flaunted and exposed on a television show that young people watch and are influenced by. This is a sexuality that many find offensive and immoral. They are not content to keep it in their bedroom but want society to not just tolerate it but accept and condone it. This is why we are inundated with this in all areas of society, especially forms of entertainment, so as to influence the next generation to view this as normal acceptable and possibly even preferable. So your argument could actually be used against what they are doing and supportive of what people here have done. You could say why don’t they keep it in the privacy of their bedroom rather than flaunt it in pornographic ways on the public streets of either coast during their parades. Why is it overtly portrayed in entertainment with a frequency that far exceeds its prevalence in the greater society if not the fact that it is agenda driven to gain acceptance and influence with the masses, particularly the next generation. This is what people are standing against. You do not have a realistic view of the nature of things or the social/spiritual warfare that is ongoing. There is such a thing as a false peace and I believe this is what you are advocating based upon what you have posted.
Report Post »Cherynn
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 11:04pmI have a very good idea of what is going on in society. I deal with it every day on a very personal level. I am a conservative. I am a patriot. I am a veteran. I firmly believe in America as it was founded, on the principals of individual freedoms and limited government. My family fought in the American revolution and helped start this GREAT country. I dont appreciate the radical gay agenda in this counrty either. They are the loud selfish people (kind of like union members) that ruin things for others just trying to get along in the world. I blame the hollywood crowd for what is shown on TV and cable. I have also NEVER voted for a democrat in the 31 years I have been voting. But, I AM TRANSGENDERED. I deal with bigotry daily. I dont want to be special. I just want the EQUAL justice that everyone deserves and I dont want to be punished by my fellow country men/woman for being different. There are alot of conservative LGBT people out there, not all of us are the rabid loons the media likes to parade in front of the news cameras.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 11:59pm@ CHERYNN…………Please don’t take my responses as an attack of you personally. That is not my goal. I simply want to keep the discussion on point and accurate to facts (not that I am all knowing, please do not hear that form me). Certainly any topic that is personal or emotional to us has the ability to let our sensitivities cloud our thoughts and perspectives (me included). I have no doubt that you have served your country bravely and I am sorry that you have endured the hatred you have throughout your life and thank you for your service. I simply seek to speak more in an objective manner by espousing the truth as I hold to be the reality of the world both seen and unseen that we live in. I have not always been a Christian. At one time an atheist. However, after a fairly deep and intense investigation into the person of Christ and claims of His resurrection after being crucified I have come to the conclusion that He is real and is the son of God. In that way my story is not that different from Lew Wallace (author of Ben Hurr) who set out to disprove the account of Jesus only to become a devout believer after examining all the evidence. Or Lee Stroble a devout atheist who also set out to disprove Christ and then became a follower after reviewing the evidence. I have read and studied many things in my life and have found that the only person I have ever read that has spoken words of life is Jesus. That is why I am his disciple . Thank you for your comment.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:28pmSilly conservatives! Remember you are not allowed to talk openly about your beliefs or opinions. Only the Left and the EXTREME Left are allowed that courtesy. You need to stay in the closet where you belong- or “progress” with the correct thinking folks. You are obviously just a bunch of old white guys who believe in an old book about a carpenter & a piece of paper that is what? ->230-240 years old!! What knuckleheads!!!!
Report Post »audiemurphy
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:27pmthat lady looks like Cindy lauper
Report Post »chips1
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:25pmHuff-Po should just suck it up.
Report Post »audiemurphy
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:24pmNormalising of abnormal behaviour. And how dare anyone share an opposite view to homosexuality and it’s lifestyle. I have no problem with homosexuals I have found some of them to be honest upright and generally good people overall. I just completely disagree with their choice to engage in homosexual acts of fornication. and I cannot imagine what a trial it must be for anyone struggling with such a trial in this life. God loves the sinner but despises the sin and it becomes a sin when it is acted upon first mentally and even worse physically.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:27pm@AUDIEMURPHY
Report Post »Really Audie? I have no problem with homosexuals either.
You’re correct. Many of them are GREAT human beings….,just like any group that makes up human society,some are good,some are not .So what?
I’m FOR civil unions. I DO think that if you’re dying your life partner should be at your bedside, yadda, yadda.
This is what I’m fed up with. Homosexuals make up 6% to 8% of the population. It depends on what statistics you’re buying.
If that is the case then WHY does every story about (BOO HOO) Gay Rights make it seem as though they are at least 50% of the population and they should have the right to marry? I am weary of talk like that.
Majority rules Audie. Gay rights, yeah. Gay marriage, no!
Progressive Dems could give a flying FEATHER about Gay Marriage! To them it’s just another voting bloc.
This nation has a myriad of important issues. Gay Marriage is way at the bottom.
If you’re Gay , a citizen of the U.S., and marrying your love forevermore is your largest issue…, please, emigrate to Canada.
If you’re Gay and just want to live in peace with your partner of choice…,stay here and help the rest of this country’s citizens take our country back.
Chet Hempstead
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 5:11amFirst of all, there’s no the homosexual lifestyle, they have as many different lifestyles as straight people. And all this love the sinner and hate the sin horse manure makes me want to puke. If you love people you should want them to be happy. There’s no love in the hearts of people who tell others that they shouldn’t make love with the people that they love and who love them.
Report Post »freeus
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 6:12pmIt is much easier for a sodomite to continue the learned behavior than stop it or learn a new behavior. Most people understand that.
Report Post »TumbleBumble
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:24pmYessss… speak up, people!
And an FYI – April 15th is the ‘Day of Silence’. It’s a day where gays and lesbians are allowed to go through school and not speak, in order to bring attention to their lifestyle. They claim it’s to shed light on the harassment they encounter in school, but that’s just a cover. They want acceptance.
I went back and forth with the principal of my son‘s high school last year and it didn’t do any good. He said his hands were tied. But I, and other like-minded parents, kept their kids home from school that day in protest. I made sure to tell the attendance office the reason as well, so they didn’t have to guess. Consider doing the same with your kids.
Report Post »ottodiedacktick
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:09pm@TUMBLEBUMBLE
I thought April 15th was the holiday celebrating the day of silence for the tax-payer! Now, they’ve renamed that too. At least they will never try to redefine marriage … what? … doh
Report Post »NOFUTURE
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 12:32pmI wish every day was April 15th.
Report Post »CONAN THE CONSERVATIVE
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:23pmAnd the problem with Victoria Jackson is…?
Report Post »randy
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:23pmDid you see “Glee” this week? Sickening! And, besides shoving the gay thing down our throats, they made a mockery of Christians – again! I wonder what their agenda is? Hey, producers of “Glee” – what’s your agenda? One-way tolerance?
I TOTALLY AGREE with you Victoria!
Report Post »Eblaze44
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:59pmI’m not saying in any way that I disagree with you. BUT, what the heck were you doing watching it? That was your choice. don’t watch, and if you’re really into it – don’t patronize the sponsors – you might even send them a note telling them why.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:09pmDoes anyone know who sponcers this program so I can stop buying their product. Thanks
Report Post »teachermitch32
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 12:32amEblaze44….Randy was quoting Victoria. He didn’t say he watched Glee. Read the article…then the post. Geeze!
Report Post »DieHard
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 10:59am@P C BE DAMNED
Report Post »Umm, Fox? Not every advertiser chooses specific programs, so you’re going to have to boycott every product Fox advertises, or Fox all together.
Echad
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:23pmIt’s not homophobic to call a disgusting act what its DESGUSTING!
Report Post »Salamander
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:41pmHmmm, was either boy a minor??? If so, isn’t that illegal? Why is it that heterosexuals finding two boys french kissing disgusting is called homophobic, but two homosexuals engaging in the act is ‘gay’ and not heterophobic? Isn‘t ’phobic’ a fear and not disgust? I rather think of it as homonasty, homonauseating, homonoxious, homoodious, homodisgusting or such–but NOT homophobic!!! No fear, here, just not interested in your fetish!
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:41pmSalamaner…ROFL!!!!!!!
Report Post »And yet, so true.
Chet Hempstead
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 5:03amSalamander Hmmm, was either boy a minor??? If so, isn’t that illegal?
No, there’s no age of consent for KISSING! I don’t know if they are minors, but I know that all the actors on Glee appear to be older than the characters they are playing.
Report Post »schmite123oh
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 1:32pm@watch the other hand
Well said, and very well poised. I think CHerynn if you are at all interested (you must be a little since you chose to use a verse in the bible to debate a verse used form the bible) Evidence that Demands a Verdict is a great book, that might shed some truth amongst the confusion of this world. Again, it was a man who was an atheist and set out to prove Christianity absurd and became a beleiver in the process. God Bless!
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 10:04pm@ SCHMITE…thank you!! I just now caught your post since it went above my comments a couple of posts :). God bless and have a great day !!
Report Post »IntrepidSI
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:23pmTolerance: If you don’t think like they do, you’re not.
Diversity: Everyone has an opinion and a place at the table, except whites and Christians. That’s not exclusion, that’s payback.
Stupidity: That we have come to this.
Report Post »beboc1
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 10:04pmWow, can you imagine turning on the TV in 1960 and being hit with this kind of program? Worse yet, the ads? We’ve certainly gone a long way downhill. I really don’t want to hear about your genital herpes or your erectile disfunction or ANY of that sort of thing. I don’t want to see people engaged in intercourse whether they are straight or otherwise. I think being a voyeur is disgusting!
Report Post »freeus
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 6:16pmHow true.
Report Post »Alan
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:16pmShe’s right.
Report Post »avenger
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:19pmhey what is up with exercising the 1st. amendment…..the homosexuals do it on a daily basis.
Report Post »not funny
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:29pmTammy Bruce, a gay woman and once president of a California NOW chapter, was once a liberal and is now conservative. She is a radio host who said during an interview that in days past gays just wanted to be free to live their lives and be left alone. Now they prefer to flaunt their lifestyle is in your face and don’t care who is offended by it. I do think that being gay is determined at birth, but I also think that homosexual and herteosexual behavior on television have gone too far. Keep it clean please.
Report Post »Nobamazone
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:46pm@notfunny
Report Post »alcoholism is determined at birth, but there is a choice in falling victim to it
does not make it ok
I totally agree, it has gone too far, tv, music mags, print, you name it, way too far
JJ Coolay
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:39pmIm sorry with this whole “determined at birth” business.
It’s a CHOICE. You decide who to climb in bed with. You decide what drugs you put in your body, what you drink, what you eat, what you watch, what you say…. etc, etc, etc.
Enough with the excuses. Accept responsibilty for your actions and your choices.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 4:58amAvenger
Report Post »The First Amendment is alive and well. She’s exercising it, and so are people who think she is a jerk. I think she is a jerk.
Jabber
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 9:16pmShowtime-
I realize it’s just a typo-but it’s Gilda Radner (not Hilda). Just in memorial to her greatness.
Report Post »orlandojon
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:16pmNo it’s not a “homophobic” rant, it’s called an oppinion, something even conservatives are entitled to. Watching two boys kiss is gross and hard to watch. We don’t have to all celebrate the twisted antics of hollywood as they continue to push the envelope just because they can.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:31pmYou can learn how to respond to the accusation of being homophobic by reading this article. It makes a lot of sense.
The Meaning of Same-Sex Attraction
Report Post »http://www.narth.com/docs/niconew.html
TxGold
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:34pmWho watches glee?
Report Post »sissykatz
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:34pmI still just find it amazing that we(conservatives) can’t have an opinion, if it differs from the left”s which it usually does then our is biased,racist,homophobic and any other phobic thing they can think of.They really don’t think we have a 1st amendment right..
Report Post »Virtus Veritasque
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:37pmWhat!? Conservatives entilted to an opinion? Nooooo!!! That would mean we might have…diversity…of opinion…
Irony: You‘re against diversity if you don’t completely agree with me.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:38pmThis new al-Qaida magazine for women has beauty tips and suicide-bomber tips! Gimme a break!
Report Post »———-
And thats offensive to arabs and muslims …HOW exactly ?
Thats how the mag described ITSELF
harvbell
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:41pmGood for Victoria. Not often Hollywood calls it like is!!! The world is changing fast and NOT for the good
Report Post »Virtus Veritasque
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:45pm“Who watches glee?”
Not me.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:48pmBut on the other hand, Bill Maher can do simular rants against Christians, conservatives and so on, where is their decrying of him? Hippocrats all of them.
Report Post »Tnredneck
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:48pmI would say 2 boys kissing is a **** rant. I makes me sick. I can’t help it I was born that way. Glad I don’t watch glee.
Report Post »jsDway
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:50pmIt is not homophobic to have her opinion. I call it following the morality of God. I wish the left would stop their christian-phobia attitude to those of us who love God and believe His Word.
Report Post »ottodiedacktick
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:56pmMethinx that Victoria Jackson is starting to realize that she is an oppressed minority. Next, she has to worry about being fired for her opinions. I don’t understand how asking for balance on the themes of a show is a “conservative” point of view.
Report Post »JoeBtfsplk
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 6:58pmThis letter to the editor may be apropos?
Has America become the land of the special interest and home of the double standard?
Let’s see; if we lie to the Congress, it’s a felony and if the congress lies to us its just politics; if we dislike a black person we’re racist and if a black dislikes whites, it’s their 1st Amendment right; the government spends millions to re-habilitate criminals and they do almost nothing for the victims; in public schools you can teach that homosexuality is OK, but you better not use the word God in the process; you can kill an unborn child, but its wrong to execute a mass murderer; we don’t burn books in America, we now rewrite them; we got rid of the communist and socialist threat by renaming them progressives; we are unable to close our border with Mexico, but have no problem protecting the 38th parallel in Korea; if you protest against President Obamas‘ policies you’re a terrorist, but if you burned an American flag or George Bush in effigy it was your 1st Amendment right.
You can have pornography on TV or the internet, but you better not put a nativity scene in a public park during Christmas; we have eliminated all criminals in America, they are now called sick people; we can use a human fetus for medical research, but it’s wrong to use an animal.
We take money from those who work hard for it and give it to those who don’t want to work; we all support the Constitution, but only when it supports our political ideology; we still have freedom of speech, but only if we are being politically correct; parenting has been replaced with Ritalin and video games; the land of opportunity is now the land of hand outs; the similarity between Hurricane Katrina and the gulf oil spill is that neither president did anything to help.
And how do we handle a major crisis today? The government appoints a committee to determine who’s at fault, then threatens them, passes a law, raises our taxes; tells us the problem is solved so they can get back to their reelection campaign.
Now more than ever we have to have confirmation from the United Nations. America – GET THE US OUT OF THE UNITED NATIONS NOW !!!
What has happened to the land of the free and home of the brave?
Showtime
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:22pmDon’t tell me a consrvative watches Glee!
I stopped watching SNL after Hilda Radner died, except for the opening skits.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:48pmThe reason conservatives and especially Christian conservatives cannot have an opinion or denounce anything is because it is seen as the greatest threat to a society that wants to throw off all restraints to behavior and live however they chose without their conscience being effected by anyone. Liberals worldview is typically of the morally relativistic bent and as such they reject anything that would seek to establish an authority or standard as absolute truth. The idea of God being the ultimate authority is repugnant to most in this category. The only thing more threatening is stating that they will give an account to God for their choices. This then forms the basis for the mechanism that allows many to call evil good and good evil. Since they see the idea of God and his standards as espoused by the Christian groups as oppressive and antiquated, they often support different groups or behaviors that would be denounced by Evangelicals as being harmful or sinfully destructive to paint Christians as haters that need to be marginalized or eradicated from any publicly meaningful discussion or discourse. To the “tolerant” crowd they just cannot tolerate a claim to absolute truth which is the unalterable and foundational beliefs of Christianity. This is why as a culture rebels against the standards of God its foundations and stability begin to crumble, as is the current case in America. No longer are people of faith regarded or respected in most circles. Relativism, Secularism and Humanism are in vogue in universities, entertainment, arts, and politics. Marriage is assaulted and called good, babies are assaulted and killed in their mother’s womb and it is called good. Anyone who would speak against these practices is denounced as evil and unloving, ie good is called evil and evil is called good because their entire value system has been ultimately turned on its head because of their rebellion against and hatred of God.
Report Post »ottodiedacktick
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 7:48pmWith young people nowadays it is becoming more difficult to tell who is male and who is female. Have you seen these “EMO” people? What are we old people to do? When you meet someone, you will have to shake hands and, like dogs, sniff each others butts just to make sure. This world is going to the humans!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:25pmI don’t watch Glee but just from the previews and clips I have seen .. it looks like the all Gay all the time show– so we have to just accept that? …. I don’t care what people do in their own lives but it is getting really old having this “lifestyle” pushed on our youth.
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:36pmfuuny, i hear and read the critics of Ms. jackson make antisemetic remarks against jews and jewish bankers on a regular basis. My Union is in a war against the jewish bankers right now. Just funny which sides the left takes.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 8:36pmCATB: Exactly. Do what you want in your own frikkin bedroom. Leave it OFF the TV!!!
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:05pm@ orlandojon. Amen and amen
Report Post »rwsasinger
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:17pmNow I know why I have had a crush on her since her SNL days. My kind of woman.
Report Post »Ironmaan
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:22pmA phobia refers to fear of something. I am not fearful of homosexuals, I am disgusted by them. I am also disgusted by the thought of obese people getting it on. Does that make me a fatOphobic?
Report Post »http://guerillatics.com
cemerius
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:31pmHollywood is making it so that ALL teenagers watch this crap and think it is reality!!
Report Post »UnkleBuck
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:46pmTruth of the matter is all through the 80′s & 90′s when decent Americans urged these vermin to restrain from their depravity just a little bit, all they could say was “Turn the channel”. So, when we did they lost their A$$, and when we react with our FREEDOM OF SPEECH they try to censor us. TYPICAL LIBS, and DEPRAVED IDIOTS!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 10:26pmOTHERHAND, you’ve convinced me that you are one of the good guys. You’re not mean-spirited like many on this website. But I have to challenge your post. Not the content, but the first sentence of your post, “The reason conservatives and especially Christian conservatives cannot have an opinion or denounce anything is because it is seen as the greatest threat to a society that wants to throw off all restraints to behavior and live however they chose without their conscience being effected by anyone.”
Why do you say you “cannot have an opinion or denounce anything”? Seriously, who is preventing you from doing that? You can post here or anywhere. You can give your opinions to anyone who will listen. You start your own website and say whatever you want. You can stand on the street corner and say whatever you want. You can stand up in church and say whatever you want.
You can say anything you want and the police won’t arrest you. Your taxes won’t go up.
Why do you say you can’t have an opinion? Think about it. Why do you say you “cannot have an opinion”?
Frankly I think you say that because when you express an opinion, people disagree with you. Sorry otherhand, you have any opinion you want, and anyone you express it to has a right to disagree. That doesn‘t mean you can’t have an opinion, that just means other people don’t agree with you.
Report Post »exdem
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 10:47pmDoesnt she have a song on youtube tittled “theres a communist in the White House”?
Report Post »I admire her for speaking out instead of caving in to the progressive pressure in showbiz.
Templar Knight
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 10:49pmGo Victoria Jackson, you have just rushed up to one on the top of my list of actors I like. It‘s not a very big list but I appreciate actors who actually have guts and stand up for what’s right, especially those who are tea party candidates. Now that takes courage in the world of Hollywood.
Report Post »davisgarvey
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 11:08pmWay to go Victoria, speak your mind unafraid of what HuffPo may say!
Report Post »WhiteTeaParty
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 11:14pmI love how Glee bothers the Right so much.
Could it be that Glee is #3 rated show in the 18-49 demographics????
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 11:43pm@ JZS….Hey my friend I have not seen you post for a little while. Let me address your comment and explain what I meant. I did not mean that I cannot espouse a view and you are absolutely right when you say others may disagree with me all day long, that is most definitely their right. Nor was I saying I had no forum to espouse my views. I was stating that many who hold to a morally relativistic worldview would like to marginalize or eradicate my views based upon the statements of bigotry or hatred tactics that have been utilized at times by some who would hold opposing views, if it were possible for them to do so. Because of the nature of their worldview compared to mine they do see my statements of absolute truth as dangerous or unfair or just plain hateful. I on the other hand must espouse my views as I do because to not act on my beliefs if they be true would be unloving and hateful of others who would deny what I believe is true. Therefore, you can see the proverbial line in the sand that neither side will or can back away from without totally denying their entire worldview and belief system. No doubt that there is unfortunate displays of verbal and violent hatred aimed at certain groups, but I would say this goes all ways and is not an exclusive suffering of any one group and I would denounce these towards anyone. Secondly, I used that opening as a continuation of someone else’s expressed thought in the form of a question. To connect the two ideas, the question with my answer to it, I used that phraseology. Not necessarily indicating or meaning what you extrapolated. Thank you for your kind words, and as always I appreciate your response.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 1:07am@cemerius
Posted on March 20, 2011 at 9:31pm
Hollywood is making it so that ALL teenagers watch this crap and think it is reality!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It’s called b-r-a-i-n-w-a-s-h-i-n-g.
It took me a while, but, thanks to CatB, I figured it out.
Report Post »“Glee” = “Gay”
P-yuk!
SCHEXbp
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 1:43amI watched GLEE at the beginning because of the hype. I do NOT watch “Idol” & singing shows, but was a little surprised at how I enjoyed their renditions in the first year (a novelty for me?). I am about 10 months behind in my episodes as of now, but have seen enough highlights to gather it’s way overblown sexually & homosexually.
Report Post »The first year was disturbing for its light-heated use of pregnancy. The wife of the GLEE teacher PRETENDED to be pregnant to hold her marriage together. And the head cheerleader (& head of Abstinence, of course) PRETENDED that the nice guy impregnated her (instead of the mean jock) because the nice guy/boyfriend ********** in a hot tub they were sharing. Both of these facades lasted much of the first season.
Now the extreme flaunting homosexual boy has achieved revolting status. NO MALE acts that way without DELIBERATELY adopting such voice & mannerisms, etc. (I also did not like the younger brother on “Ugly Betty” who was all interested in fashion & such when was barely a teenager, if that, & I doubt in reality if his Hispanic Father would not have tried to guide him into acting his masculine role – that’s another show I stopped with a couple of seasons to go.)
All this stuff is LEARN YOUR LESSON TV. It started in the 60s with shows that had episodes that hit you over the head with YOUR LESSON FOR TODAY showing that YOUR judgment is stupid & you should be cool like us open-minded smart “winners.”
I do not intend to accept/approve of unnatural sexual attractions. We are humans so that we can control our impulses. I am sure that there are 16/17 year old girls that middle-aged men find sexually attractive (considering society‘s acceleration of girls’ sexuality), but such men should instantly realize that this is unreal, unhealthy & against the norms of society. No one thinks it’s OK & no one tries to ram such acceptance down your throat, And hey, that is at least correct opposite-sex attraction.
I take it back,. there is an organization that promotes middle-age men & teenagers. It’s NAMBLA. What a coincidence that sexual deviants want this OK’d too.
encinom
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 2:35amConservative are free to have an opinion, that said, if you opinion is homophobic, the rest of use are free to call you out for it.
Victoria Jackson is a fool and a bigot both of which are evidenced by her statement. She is free to make that statement and the rest of us are free to her she an ignorant buffoon.
Report Post »sabrinacle
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 5:12amaparently only leftie loons are leagally able to voice an opinion
Report Post »boomboom
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 7:10amOJ!
Where to start?…? HollyWood dying on (the) Vine…Get it??
This is a DYING media empire scrambling to push it’s ratings envelope.
Seriously, Bigamy and polagamy…(portrayed as)…HomoSmooches…(portrayed as) normal…
What’s left?
Think HollyWormWood can find an ““Actor” who takes a shine to Mr. Ed types…(portrayed as)
Report Post »normal?
Alvin691
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 7:55amRight no orlandojon. Apparently, the left is still trying to marginalize conservatives with their “coalitions of power”.
Report Post »StonyBurk
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 7:56amI gave up watching the network programs (except the news -which I find entertaining propaganda)
Report Post »I can‘t think of a single prime time TV program that hasn’t promoted the myth of a Gay America.
Can’t remember that far back to enjoy Programs like Wagon Train or Bonanza or even the edgy
M A S H none of which actually promoted the gay agenda. Klinger -on M A S H was a spoof against those who used the Law as an attempt to get out of a War -I don’t recall any episode where Klinger was imaged as homosexual. Not at all ike the social propaganda today.
smithclar3nc3
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 8:52amIt’s not homophobic to think homosexuality is wrong it called a naturalism. Just as homosexuality is called a alternative life style. Well what the he77 is it an alternative to……it’s an alternative to what nature intended. Look if you hate people and attack people for being gay,you’re homophobic. If you disagree with the life style and find it wrong natural, or religiously you‘re not homophobic you’re a naturalist PERIOD.
Report Post »Alabama Rick
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 10:14amVictoria was portrayed as a dumb blonde on SNL but she was the smartest of the bunch. Nice work Victoria.
Report Post »1Dave
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 10:25amAccording to scientists people have been around for 3 million years. During that time every possible social interaction has been tried over and over. Anyone who seriously looks into the history of homosexuality finds it never survives. Torn between shame and justification (look at Castro Street) it always becomes too self destructive to survive.
Prior to Freud, it was considered a religious or moral sin. The psychiatrists re-framed it as a mental problem. Homosexuals were rounded up and treated horribly – shock treatment, lobotomies, etc. –
They fought back by becoming psychologists and psychologists themselves, then started a propaganda program resulting in todays status. They have tried for decades to “prove” that it is genetic. I believe that it is learned behavior taught principally by sexual abuse of children.
Report Post »As with any other group they run the gamut of three dimensional bell curve behavior, good, bad, . . .
There is no “Gay Community.“ I still resent their stealing the once beautiful word ”gay.” They are NOT a happy lot.
LisaC49
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 4:39pmWho watches “Glee”, anyway, but a segment of the population who have jellybeans for brains and do not know the least thing about what is going on around them? I believe they are the same zombies who voted for Obama…or are zombie-wannabe’s!
Report Post »HUGGINGMYBABIES
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 4:39pmYou want to know who watches it? My terribly confused step daughter who is all of 10! Just another reason it WON’T be on in MY house!
Report Post »craiger59
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 5:19pmThis was the same episode where Kathy Griffin played a VERY conservative Christian. You can’t get any more disrespectful than that. It was an over the top portrayal that I’m sure was meant to mock the “right”.
Report Post »SpunkyGal
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 5:32pmI believe in loving people regardless of sexual orientation. But loving people is not the same as accepting everyone’s choices as being okay. I don’t believe that homosexual lifestyles are okay with God. I won‘t pretend like it’s morally a fine decision. My heart goes out to those who struggle with same sex attraction. But I can’t support acting on impulses. And the fact that the movie industry keeps shoving crap down our throat about how we are haters if we don’t agree with a lifestyle decision makes me sick. If I need to be open-minded about homosexuality, then others should be open-minded about my Christian principles.
Marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God. Family is central to our Creator’s plan for the eternal destiny of His children. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity. Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. Successful marriages and families are established and maintained on principles of faith, prayer, repentance, forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, and wholesome recreational activities. By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. Disability, death, or other circumstances may necessitate individual adaptation. Extended families should lend support when needed.
I do not apologize for my beliefs as stated above.
Report Post »freeus
Posted on March 21, 2011 at 8:30pmHomosexual behavior is evil.
Report Post »colonial10
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 1:39amHow many times does it take a progressive and leftist to get the point? Never! They’ll be arguing with God when he separates the sheep from the goats.
Report Post »Mee the People
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 4:22amthey like to show off because they know they are doing wrong
Report Post »tradexpertbuysell
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 7:07amThey can attempt to glorify it but in the end it is plain corn ho77ing!
How that for a liberal tweek!
Thus sayeth the LORD “An abomination”.
The ultimate tweek to end all tweeks!
Report Post »Oil_Robb
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 8:48amSodomy is a learnt behavior….there is no such thing as a **** gene
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 10:41amWe’re living in an age that calls darkness light. Thanks Victoria (Ms. Jackson if you’re nasty!) for not suppressing the truth of your convictions even though it may bring hardship.
BTW-Enjoyed and agreed with both “the other hand” and “JZS” posts here, although I rarely agree with JZS. It must be noted however that some speech is becoming more free than other speech. Eric Holder’s refusal to prosecute the clear cut cases of voter intimidation is a prime recent example. Less recent examples are the the hate crimes legislation that punishes the same criminal acts disproportionally based on motivations. I contend that is essentially an attack on free speech/thought.
Report Post »GagMeWithASpoon
Posted on March 22, 2011 at 5:37pmdoes it make me a hypocrite, being a gay woman, to be grossed out by two men kissing? because if it does, idc! YUK!
Report Post »Twistedriffz
Posted on March 29, 2011 at 8:03pmI think it is sick that some people have such animosity towards homosexuality. How is another persons sexual preference any of your business??? For those of you who choose to quote the bible, I thought that one of God’s major rules was to NOT judge other human beings? Aren’t all sins equal? You are already throwing stones from glass houses. We ALL have government given rights to live (and worship) the way that we want to. So mind your own business. If you were in a deadly car crash and a man wearing a rainbow shirt came to pull you out of your burning car, I‘m fairly certain that you wouldn’t be so judgmental as to turn him away because of his sexual orientation. The thought probably wouldn’t even come close to crossing your mind. That would be stupid. My point being that in the end we are ALL human beings and not one of us should point the finger, because we are ALL imperfect, and DON’T YOU EVER FORGET IT!
Report Post »