Entertainment

‘I Am God’: Morgan Freeman Explains His Bizarre Take on Religion

Morgan Freeman Explains His Views on Religion and Says He Is God

Morgan Freeman (AP Photo/Chris Pizzello)

Oscar award-winning actor Morgan Freeman played the role of God convincingly in “Bruce Almighty” alongside Jim Carey back in 2003, but did you know that Freeman believes he actually is God?

Let us explain. While Freeman doesn’t consider himself almighty or capable of working miracles, he has repeatedly given himself the title of “God” while explaining his extremely unique take on faith and the possible existence of a higher power.

In an interview with Fox411 earlier this week, Freeman was asked about his faith and whether he thinks there is a God. Some of his answers may surprise you.

From Fox411:

Fox411: Do you think there is a God?

[Morgan Freeman]: Do I think there’s a God? Um (pause) yeah.

Fox411: You paused.

MF: I paused because I am God.

Fox411: Because every man is created in God’s image.

MF: Yes or God’s created in my image.

Now, if you take his comments at face value, it may appear that Freeman has some serious ego issues that would require an entire team of psychologists to remedy. However, we did some digging and discovered the actor has spoken about his oddball views on religion previously, though it is still difficult to completely understand his rationale.

Last month, The Wrap asked Freeman about an upcoming episode of his show, “Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman,” which airs on the Science Channel. The episode was titled, “Did We Invent God?,” and the actor had an answer to the question: “Yes.”

In other words, Freeman doesn’t believe there is an omnipresent creator watching over the Earth but rather God was created by man.

He continued, “Well, here’s a scientific question: Has anybody ever seen hard evidence? What we get is theories from our earlier prophets. Now, people who think that God invented us think that the Earth can’t be more than 6,000 years old. So I guess it’s a question of belief. My belief system doesn’t support a creator as such, as we can call God, who created us in His/Her/Its image.”

Additionally, Freeman said it was “hard” to say whether he was an atheist or agnostic because he thinks “we invented God.”

“So if I believe in God, and I do, it‘s because I think I’m God,” he added.

Finally, Freeman also told Piers Morgan on CNN in September that he was “God.”

“You asked me before if I was a God-fearing man,” said Freeman. “And I said…”

“You don’t fear anyone,” Morgan replied.

“…Right, I’m God. Now that may sound frivolous but what I mean is that if God exists it only has to — it can only exist in you, not outside you, right?”

Got it? It’s alright, neither do we.

Comments (205)

1 2 3 4
  • LeadNotFollow
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:13pm

    …
    Arrogant, backward, senile, old fool.

    Report Post »  
    • rickc34
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:33pm

      I thought he was afraid of conservatives a few stories ago, I guess whatever medication he is on is working. Booooooo Morgan

      Report Post »  
    • Gates
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:37pm

      Nothing new here. Just more new age nonsense! Man’s arrogance is without peer.

      Report Post »  
    • skimmer57
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:40pm

      Lead– Ask any mormon. You don’t become a God until after your dead.

      Report Post »  
    • NHwinter
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 5:12pm

      I imagine all of Hollywood thinks like he does. A huge group of arrogrant fools.

      Report Post » NHwinter  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 6:34pm

      Christian? Have or do you ever the Bible? In Exodus when God is speaking to Moses God’s said his name over and over again.

      “I am” Exodus 3 13-15 Moses said to God “Suppose I go to the Israelites and and say to them, The God of your Fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, What is his name? Then what shall I tell them? 14God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM” This is what you are to say to the Israelites. “I AM has sent me to you.” 15 God also said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites, The Lord, the God of your fathers – the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob – has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, the name by which I AM to be remembered from generation to generation.

      Read this for yourself in any version of the Bible you want. God’s name is “I am” God is his title he is our God or your God. Not be confuse with the notion that you are the deity God himself. Remember that we are to be God’s hands and feet, we are to be the salt of the earth, we are to be the light the darkness, through Christ’ God is now not just in the temple but in our hearts, we are to treat our bodies like the temple etc, etc.

      Our salvation through Christ is a personal individual salvation offered to everyone. Their is a choice and we have to choose. Good or evil, selfishness or selflessness, God can not be on our side unless we are on God’s side etc.

      I don’t know what the the old wacko Morgan was trying to say. He was sounding more blasphemous/at

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • INTHEBROTHERHOOD
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 6:48pm

      seriously………definitly didnt help soddam and gomorah too much…….pride and arrogance that is….
      im just sayin

      Report Post » INTHEBROTHERHOOD  
    • IMPrepared
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 7:30pm

      @ Enrico.

      Sorry dude, but Moses, he’s NOT!

      Report Post » IMPrepared  
    • Bluebonnet
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 7:36pm

      God, forgive this senile old fool. He knows not what he’s saying.

      In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.
      The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. (meaning Jesus was the Word)

      Report Post »  
    • Cosmos102
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 7:49pm

      I bet Obama is really pissed at MF’s remarks. Clearly Obama is “the one”.

      Report Post » Cosmos102  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 8:56pm

      @IMPrepared ??? I don’t know what you are getting at? What are you saying? Are saying that Moses wasn’t God? If so, who suggests that? Morgan Freeman Moses is not God nor is any man!

      Through Christ we are saved. We can do God’s work through our actions. We are to accept who Jesus was/is as our Saviour and repent. As said in the Bible God = Good God = Love and if we suppose to have accept Christ into our heart as the Saviour than we must also love and be good. We are to be Christ like aka Christian.

      You’re not saved by your works but also without any works how can you cam to be saved.
      We shall know each other by our fruits.

      All I said is that God is his title and his name(as said in the Bible) is “I am”. This can not disputed. Go back and read it for yourself. His name I Am for a reason.

      So again Exodes 3:14 God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM” This is what you are to say to the Israelites. “I AM has sent me to you.” 15 God also said to Moses, “Say to the Istaelites, The Lord, the God of your fathers – the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob – has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, the name by which I AM to be remembered from generation to generation.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • Bluebonnet
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 9:21pm

      @the real enrico: Yes, you are right, it’s mentioned often that HE is the “I AM” also,
      Isaiah 44:6 “I am the first and I am the last; and beside me there is NO God.

      Report Post »  
    • HKS
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 9:42pm

      If I was that close to a meeting with the boss, I don’t think I would want to piss him off.

      Report Post » HKS  
    • Thomas
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 10:13pm

      God is not a relative being. Nothing relative is objective Reality. God is only always in the present true Origin just as Life is always in the present.

      Illusion is that which appears, seems real, but then disappears like a mirage but Truth (reality) is that which is and has been always. Self is a delusion that mixes and dilutes Truth (reality) with illusion. Time is a word we use to describe illusion and its nature while Life is Truth and is always. Life is already Eternal but it is the deluded mind that mixes Life and time and then lives by the philosophy of “lifetime”. We have been given time in order to make a decision of which we want more Truth which brings us the nature of the Truth or more illusion which brings us the nature of illusion. Death is the result of the nature of illusion. We must reap what we sow. God simply doesn’t want us to wait til we die but to realize the Truth now and humble the time created and therefore illusory self identity for the sake of the Truth which is the imagless Spirit of Life our loving Father whom Jesus came to introduce us to and to teach us how to humble the self.

      Report Post » Thomas  
    • waggie
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 10:27pm

      This guy is a KOOK.

      Report Post » waggie  
    • Patriot of My America
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 11:05pm

      Satan has a personal Demon waiting for the Shank to beg for redemption,, Pun intended …

      Report Post »  
    • Amos37
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:52am

      I work at a nursing home and look forward to serving mr. freeman.
      One question I have is what is all this talk about the earth only being 6,000 years old? Don’t any “christians” know about the 3 world ages? maybe some of them need to study genesis 1:1-2. even arnold murray could teach them this simple truth.

      Report Post »  
    • grudgywoof
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:12am

      If he’s god then we are screwed.

      Report Post » grudgywoof  
    • 2Fedup
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:28am

      Also its ok to date ur step/inlaw granddaugter when ur god. This guys votes solely on race n calls tea partiers racist. Id b happy never seeing another movie of his ever again.

      Report Post » 2Fedup  
    • TexasHunter
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:31pm

      He has been watching to many Morgan Freeman reruns.

      Report Post » TexasHunter  
    • Secret Squirrel
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:49pm

      .
      Morgan,
      Careful, you’ll be blacklisted in Hollywood if word gets out that you even believe in god.

      Report Post » Secret Squirrel  
    • SquareHead
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:17pm

      What a shame he is one of my favorite actors, and I would like to like him… Well, well, that is how it goes with these actors. They will one day have to answer for their arrogance, as we all will.

      Report Post »  
    • useless data to respond
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 3:15pm

      God is THE “intelligence” that contains all of the needed parts of everything that could exists within any imagined reality, and harmonizes these different variables together, into an existance where an infinite numbers of sub-intelligences can be created. These “sub-intelligences” (you/me) are fractals of the one GOD, yet take on our own personality, due to the ‘individual experiences’ that each ‘sub-unit’ has, of the whole experience being shared.

      This individual ‘sub-unit’ perspective (I/me), is like a “brain cell” of GOD experiencing separation from ‘it’self and ‘it’s‘ ’TRUE’ nature of being to the point that “it” thinks “it” is an individual, and develops a character all “it’s” own based on the personality traits inherited by the GODhead. These traits are then fostered and selectively groomed by the sub-units individual perspective experiences, while thinking “itself” is separate.

      When the individual perspective with “it’s“ newly formed personality can learn NOT to serve ”it”self first (since the individual only exits as an illusion to the personality)you earn a permanent OVERSOUL that is now allowed “it’s” own expression of the one GOD. By TRUE expression, it is meant that the one OVERSOUL can be “FULLY MANIFEST” within it’s next order of creation, now that the soul has learned to return to it’s TRUE NATURE, which is UNCONDITIONAL understanding and LOVE for ALL above oneself.

      ‘Stars’ of Hollywood elevate themselves a

      Report Post »  
  • Nicholson William R
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:12pm

    I don’t think we need this article to remind us about how out of touch some people are with reality. Morgan has an excuse for his errors, his ability as an actor has placed him in fantasy land for too long. I feel the better point is, that Jason the author stated “ and the possible existence of a higher power ” thus showing that even without Morgans bath of fantasy ; it’s possible to ignor reality and God in this federally run indoctrination system. Abolish dept of education so that people can have some contact with God thru unvarnished , untarnished reality !

    Report Post » Nicholson William R  
    • commonsensefreethinker1
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:24am

      The only reason they think the earth is between 6,000-10,000 years old is to give them more time to wait for (his) return, after all if the earth was billions of years old and (god) created everything in just a few days their math wouldn’t calculate and it would give us non believers more time to evolve. Its called select thinking. Make it fit weather it does or not

      Report Post » commonsensefreethinker1  
  • Look4DBigPicture
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:58pm

    Dementia. Sad to see a likable movie star age into a ridiculous old fool. Someone needs to keep this man away from the mic.

    Report Post »  
    • Xyskalla
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 11:47pm

      What is so odd about this? He bought into the serpent’s lie. He is his own god. He’s no different than most people.

      Report Post »  
  • Lt_Scrounge
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:34pm

    Well that delusion does explain a lot of his recent rants about the political situation in this country. It‘s not that he’s completely ignorant of history, political science or economics, it‘s that he’s spent so much time pretending to be something that he‘s not that he’s lost touch with reality. There does seem to be an epidemic of that going around Hollywood these days. Look at the idiotic comments from the black one percenters Chris Rock and friends this past week.

    Report Post »  
    • dublinthewagons
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 5:00pm

      Obama has been around him Too long. He thinks he’s god too. What fools.

      Report Post »  
    • commonsensefreethinker1
      Posted on July 15, 2012 at 9:12am

      @LT
      YOU SAID:It‘s not that he’s completely ignorant of history, political science or economics,

      For your info.The bible is not history, if it was it would be taught in schools. Church’s are not considered real forms of education. Just for those who are weak minded and easily brainwashed.

      Report Post » commonsensefreethinker1  
  • jnw325
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:33pm

    The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. Psalms 14:1

    It seems that Freeman has allowed the culture of Hollywoods left get to him……he is a good actor and a smart man; can obtain anything he wants in life but for what? To die in the end and find out he is wrong…it seems that he gave his soul to the wrong cause

    For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? Matthew 16:26

    Report Post » jnw325  
  • ConservativeCanucklehead
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:25pm

    I think I understand what he means. If my understanding is correct, it does not seem “bizarre”, as the headline editorializes.

    Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:54pm

      Yea it’s only bizzare to a nation of people who think pregnancy is immaculate, Jesus walked on water, Lot’s wife was turned into a sodium or calcium chloride pillar ( likely the later due to abundance of limestone), and a crucified man’s body miraculously disappeared. Morgan‘s conception aligns with mine and I’m sure he would agree. That human beings, consuming the energy of the universe and expressing it as a discerning intelligence makes us god. We are god. If the energy and matter in the universe had a “desire” it is to look upon itself. In the right conditions presented on earth, through evolution we find energy finding itself through us. The universe is an organism. Physicists show that energy comes into and goes out of existence without a creator. It is likely there is no beginning and no end to this just as the ancient jews had described God. The big bag was the beginning of our universe but the data suggests energy moves between universes and there is no reason to assume there was nothing before the big bang as christians and muslims do ASSUME. All the supernatural magic of existence is here in the now and in reality. No need to look beyond what is in front of your face. People at CERN look at it the supernatural (really the natural) magic of reality, people in Church make it up. I’d rather be part of the team looking at the real supernatural stuff rather than satisfying myself with imaginations.

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:15pm

      In other words, as the Jewish mystics surmised before applied quantum physics, is that the entirety of the universe, the matter, the energy, including humans is god. Only humans as part of the universe can say I AM GOD. The matter and energy always existed always will. My conception of christians and muslims is that somehow they think they are outside the universe, when they fail to realize all the same matter and energy that makes up a black hole makes up them. all the elements in their bodies produced billions of years ago in exploding stars, and they have the audacity to assume they are more special and evolution doesn’t apply to them. Morgan Freeman, you are god, and so I am! The one god the culmination of the universe. that is the god Jews talk about… Not christians, Not muslims, not mormons, not christian scientists.. fantasy religions. This is why being Jewish is not requisite on faith… Yours truly – A Jewish Atheist!

      Report Post »  
    • Warpspeedpetey
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:54pm

      An Open letter to Morgan Freeman

      Mr. Freeman. You are not G-d. I know this because you are not logically necessary. Your negation results in no contradiction. On the other hand G-d, Actus Purus, the very act of being, existence itself, is logically necessary because the negation of G-d results in a contradiction. Nothing exists.
      So rest assured Mr. Freeman, the ultimate explanation for everything is either “G-ddidit“ or ”it just is”. Nothing is explained with “it just is” that conclusion is just answering a mystery with a mystery. The only explanation that has explanatory power is G-ddidit.

      Report Post »  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 5:14pm

      @WARPSPEEDPETEY

      This is a prime example of your brain on religion.

      So fearful, so brainwashed, so superstitious, so willing to accept absolutely anything that throughout the entirety of their post they have to type out “God” as “G-d.”

      Like it makes any damn difference. If a God did exist, do you think he would look at your post and say, “well, I should punish Warp, but TECHNICALLY he didn’t say or write God(which wouldn’t be blasphemy anyways), so it’s all good.”

      Give me a break.

      God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God

      Such myth, such magic, such delusion.

      It’s really sad to see how deluded you are.

      Report Post »  
    • Warpspeedpetey
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 6:10pm

      @Moderation

      Is there a point to your rant? Did you really just take the time to critique the way I reference the Tetragrammaton? Why should that bother you in the least? How do you know it’s related to superstition and not surety? Is that just an arbitrary assertion or is it simply because you do not believe yourself?

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 8:47pm

      @ Cesium…..you stated, if I understand you right, that matter and energy always existed…You do realize this is an impossibility? It is absolutely impossible for 2 reasons. If the universe, and therefore the energy within it, has always existed, in other words is eternal, then why hasn’t all energy run out according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics? Also, in order to get to the present in an infinitely old universe, an infinite amount of time would have to be crossed. But, it is impossible to cross an infinite amount of time to get to now. These problems would also mean that there could not be an infinite amount of past cycles of the universe where it expands and contracts forever. So, those explanations can’t work. If you say that matter and energy simply existed in different forms before a universe did that produces another problem in addition to the previous two. If the necessary conditions for the cause of the universe have always existed within the pre-existent matter and energy, then the effect of the universe being formed is a necessary result of that matter and energy, and the universe would have been formed an infinitely long time ago. But this can’t work since it would mean the universe would have already run out of useable energy by now (2nd law of thermodynamics), not to mention the perpetual problem of crossing an infinite amount of time to get to now. So, that explanation doesn’t work either.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 9:12pm

      @ CESIUM….”The universe is an organism. Physicists show that energy comes into and goes out of existence without a creator.” This is a intellectual misrepresentation of the reality of where science is in regards to this topic. You have fallaciously made seem as if this has a bearing on your explanantion. Virtual particles are constrained to have short lives because they represent an increase in the energy of the universe; Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle affords room for sufficiently short-lived virtual particles, but long-lived ones appearing in a universe such as ours would violate the first law of thermodynamics. The objection is that when the physicists refer to “nothing,” they are, in fact, referring to something other than the literal absence of anything. So your dilemma still exists because you have not overcome the problem I presented to you initially.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 10:05pm

      @sleazy ” If the universe, and therefore the energy within it, has always existed, in other words is eternal, then why hasn’t all energy run out according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics?” .. because you have forgotten the first law of thermodynamics. The 2nd law also never states “energy runs out” Not sure where you got that from.

      “Also, in order to get to the present in an infinitely old universe, an infinite amount of time would have to be crossed. But, it is impossible to cross an infinite amount of time to get to now.” This is not true because before the sigularity of our universe there was no time. And as Hawking points out, if there is no time there is no creator. The mere word “creator” suggests time was ticking before our universe Maybe in other universes but not ours. A first mover also suggests time before ours. But other infinite (in and out of existence) universes could interact.

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 10:25pm

      @sleasy “Virtual particles are constrained to have short lives because they represent an increase in the energy of the universe; Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle affords room for sufficiently short-lived virtual particles, but long-lived ones appearing in a universe such as ours would violate the first law of thermodynamics.” What is your response to anti-matter doubling in mass out of the mass put in to create it and where does it go?

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 10:33pm

      @ also entropy of our universe is a closed system. T=O of the big bang would be the lowest level of entropy. We don’t know where we are accelerating to as the universe expands but acceleration is really a function of gravity, which is in turn a function of time. If the universe is accelerating we are moving toward where time slows.. as is the case with a black hole. We have no information of what occurs beyond the event horizon of a black hole. and you can say if you think small that our universe is increase in entropy but until we know what happens in terms of the birth and death of a universe I have no reason to assume entropy is not converted relative to a parallel universes.. I don’t know, neither does any other physicist. I won’t take the cop out answer though.. way too satisfying and easy! But if you would like to go out to the porch and drink the cool aid by putting god at the end of your equation, by all means.

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 10:51pm

      @ CESIUM…multiverses is a rather sloppy way to deal with the problem at hand even many in the scientific area of Hawkin have criticized this theory. Correction to state …..useable energy is running down. I assumed that would be understood. Simply stating there was no time before the singularity does not solve your dilemma because if conditions existed for the singularity to exist then they did so in an infinite times span from where we find ourselves currently and so the same problems exist for your position. Curiously, you did not object to my statement about virtual particles and your use I believe in a mischaracterized way to explain an area of difficulty as it relates to the ex nihlo universe. Also, curiously in your statement that I forgot the 1st law of thermodynamics (which I did not I was simply presumptuous that you would understand the point made), you bring to bear a point that your virtual partical example cannot exist in long spans of time because it would violate the 1st Law of thermodynamics. The only reason that they can exist at all is because of the Heisenberg’s uuncertainty priinciple. So I do not feel like you have adequately addressed or eleviated the problem that still exists for stating where the universe and therefore all energy comes form. Thank you for your response ahead of time.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 11:07pm

      @ CESIUM…..if both matter and ati-matter were present in equal quantities at the birth of the universe then why is most everything around just ordinary matter?

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:18am

      @sleazy doesn’t violate the first law of thermodynamics if you consider the multiverse. The theory is easily criticized, but I don’t have a dilemma in the short life of virtual qunta, I only concede to have a hypothesis based on something we indeed observe (in addition to dark gravity). You have a dilemma in your assumptions since you are suggesting there is an intelligence that lies outside our universe in that created what we have. However, this intelligence to have created energy can only do so in some kind of time of its own. To have “thought” is action over time. Therefore, we are making the assumption there is an extra “magic” beyond nature, and this magic is not a universe but contains an intelligence that always existed but can make a universe. So where and when is the first “thought” of this so called intelligent “spirit”? If we ignore that this is impossible (an intelligence that infinitely existed in thought or can manifest energy from spirit), then this intelligence acted as the “primary mover.“ If god has no beginning and no end then the only god that can exist is one without intelligence since there has to be a ”first thought.” Energy does not have to have a thought to exist without beginning. Intelligence of any kind cannot exist without a beginning. Alternatively, if you suggest god did just came into existence from nowhere and nothing with intelligence you are conceding something can come from nothing but this is not what you are suggesting;)

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:39am

      @sleazy Everything around is just ordinary matter possibly because our universe is a result of the destabilization of matter annihilated. (ie nothing) Once upon a time in “no time” when the state of energy existed in a way we don’t understand (maybe similar to the way it exists in the center of a black hole) a disruption prevented the chance for energy to annihilate itself IF it came into existence for a moment (from some other universe maybe, I don’t know, my human brain is at the limit of this conception since it is truly impossible for a life form to conceptualize no beginning or no time). Rather than reconvening with energy that prevents it from existing in our universe it did not and electrons found nuclei in our universe because it did not find anti-electrons or anti-protons in separated universe. I’m still not saying the multiverse is true, but it’s no less untrue than a timeless intelligence with the ability to create energy from nothing but “spirit.“ If you want me to acknowledge that energy always existed and there is some kind of mysterious property to it that is analogous to a ”desire,“ and so that in the right zone where the temperature held within the proper range and the elements exist in necessary abundance that this ”desire“ in energy to be ”self aware” represents god then I’ll accept that. and it is that god which Morgan Freeman is saying he is. It is also an ancient Jewish concept.

      Report Post »  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:59am

      @WARPSPEEDPETEY

      If you can’t get my point then I suggest you re-read what I wrote.

      My point is painfully obvious to someone who is capable of even a shred of logical thinking.

      To answer your question.

      Yes I know it’s superstition. It‘s painfully obvious that it isn’t “surety” because there are millions of people who “believe” just like you, yet don’t go out of their way to type God as G-d.

      The reason it bothers me is because your superstitions and mysticism impact mine and other’s life.

      I assume you vote? Do you vote along your religious beliefs? If so, you and your cult try to create and pass legislation to force others to live around what you believe your God said is moral and immoral.

      I‘m sorry that I don’t want the world to go back to the days when it was ruled by people who accepted that things like magic and witches are things that exist.

      Report Post »  
    • JGirl
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:57am

      I get what he’s trying to say – as above, so below – being the master of your own universe; was probably taken a bit out of context & misquoted a bit. Not everyone believes in an angry, punishing God. Such vehement anger here in these comments. Tolerance for other’s religous beliefs is both important & fascinating to me. He’s not hurting anyone; he’s not sacrificing children or virgins (would be a hard find in Hollywood though) or animals, for crying out loud. & that business w/ his step kid – a bunch of made-up gossip right out of National Enquirer or some trash like that. The religion I was raised with believe THEIR way is the ONLY way, which is why it doesn’t work for me – how pompous & arrogant is that to think that every other religion is wrong….hmmm, no more arrongant that Morgan here. “God made Truth with many doors to welcome every believer who knocks on them.” – Kahlil Gibran

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:06am

      @ CESIUM….Philosopher J. S. Mill (not a Christian) summed up where we have now come to: “It is self-evident that only Mind can create mind.” The only rational and reasonable conclusion is that an eternal Creator is the one who is responsible for reality as we know it. Or to put it in a logical set of statements:

      • Something exists.
      • You do not get something from nothing.
      • Therefore a necessary and eternal “something” exists.
      • The only two options are an eternal universe and an eternal Creator.
      • Science and philosophy have disproven the concept of an eternal universe.
      • Therefore, an eternal Creator exists.

      Again thank you for your time and I think we will both continue to disagree which is just fine. I appreciate your dialogue and insights and hope that we are both sharper as a result of our interchange….

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:11pm

      Sorry this post should have gone before the previous one…..@ CESIUM…again thank you for taking the time to engage me on this topic. I have been seeing patients so it has taken a bit to respond…..If god has no beginning and no end then the only god that can exist is one without intelligence since there has to be a ”first thought.” Energy does not have to have a thought to exist without beginning…….This is a fallacious arguement in that the singularity would face a similar paradox in that there had to be a time when it either did not exist or it has always existed both exhaustive possibilities face the same issues previously discussed in the line of causes. If it did not exist then there had to be a cause befor it did and therefore “something” that started that cause. If it always existed then we have the problems with eternality. The fallacy rests in the infinite regression argument of which position either God or Universe ex nihlo faces. If no 1st cause exists then there can be no 2nd or thrid cause and on and on and yet we exist based on cuasal determination. So both you and I face 1st causal dilemmas. I choose to believe that an intelligent designer that is independent of time and therefore creator of time, is able to be the 1st cause of the phenomona we observe scientifically as this makes more logical sense given the dilemmas of causes…..Continued

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:16pm

      @sleazy I appreciate the dialogue too only, I’ve heard your kind of argument many times, similarly, from lauded philosophers who can only conceptualize to the limit of their brain. If it is concluded that it is self evident that mind created mind it is only self evident to a mind that cannot conceptualize “no time” or “forever in the past.” It is also an answer based on limited information, thus argument from ignorance. This does not satisfy the question of who created the minds mind to create the mind. You really have to explain this phenomenon with “magic” and assume magic is real. To create energy from nothing by virtue of eternal spiritual mind would have to be “magic” in the fictional sense. “Supernatural” should not be a word that even exists because if you assume a realm of magic exists where the creator dwells to create the natural, then that is “natural.” You’re entire argument suggests a mind created something from nothing even if itself exists magically. I don’t find this a valid conclusion to explain existence. I just find it satisfying

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:04pm

      @ CESIUM…..While their is no argument from me that I do not possess all knowledge required to answer all questions in regard to my position, I would assert that within intellectually honesty parameters, you find yourself in the same position. Therefore, from your position you are forced to assume non-mind created mind which seems to me to be a fallacy in logic in that what is created reflects the creator (generic meaning, not god necessarily). Inanimate logically does not creat the animate, non-intellectual cannot create intellectual, non-thinking cannot create thought, chaos does not create order, chance does not produce law. I don’t desire to exasperate or belabor the issue. Suffice it to say we look at the same information and questions from different perspectives and arrive at different conclusions. Have a good day, I lQQk forward to future interaction….hopefully we both challenge our assumptions to a greater degree as a result of our dialogue. BTW, I certainly do not think of myself as a capable philosopher knowing there are many much more gifted and insightful than myself. Take care.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 2:20pm

      @sleazy.I don’t really consider myself a bona fide philosopher either so I can only rely on Occams Razor. I am an atheist of Jewish up bringing but I guess I’m like a lot of Jews everywhere who are secular. I am also a molec. biology researcher. Adaptation by natural selection is the only thing I can conceive of to explain our unique capacity for language and memory because there is a plausible evidence supported mechanism. I can’t do better than that if I am to be honest and dedicate myself to the pursuit of truth. Many creationist point to the rare experiments showing the null hypothesis is true when it comes to attempts to force selection in a laboratory. They completely ignore extreme pressures and variety of pressures in the “wild” design space, where scientists have observed speciation with animals like fish and types of lizards within the last century. If mind created mind, it only makes sense that the magic mind would only create the conditions using the elements for man to manifest through evolution.

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 2:40pm

      @ CESIUM…thanks for the background info. I find you to be well informed and intellectually honest. Really beneficial in talking with you, I trust you feel the same. I am a surgeon (ortho) by training, but I had a heavy emphasis on biology and chemistry in undergrad. As you would have reasoned I am a man of faith believing in the Christian concept of Jehovah. My real passion is astronomy, I find it truly fascinating and mysterious. I am strongly German in background, but have lived here in the states all my life. Grandfather was an immigrant. You have a good day and perhaps we can pick up where we leave off in the future? Sometime we will have to discuss evolutionary principles and insights (lol)….

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 3:18pm

      YOu too.. actually my thesis advisor is German and somewhere along the line my family was German since our last name is German derived. otherwise we are russian jews but I’m 3rd generation american so Yee haw!! … I find no need to look beyond nature for the supernatural since I find energy/matter to be in the realm of supernatural. Our existence is supernatural. Energy is magic enough for me and I can conceptualize it better as an “eternalness” that can move through states where it is able to observe itself and say “I am God” even if for a brief moment. I believe this is where Freeman is coming from even if he’s a socialist leftist nut job. Jesus is not coming back, but energy is always flowing through new people entering the cytoplasm through the mitochondria, and back out as heat. As the energy flows through us after years of evolution it can finally say “I am God” Thus I am only an atheist in the religion sense, but I am religious in the scientific sense.

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 4:45pm

      @ CESIUM…I find it interesting that you are conservative (my assumption). What, if you can, is your reasons/fouondations for conservative lines of thinking reasoning? Do you ever depart from conservative thought in any areas of social or political thinking? Thaks ahead of time. You will find I am very curious and ask many questions, sorry for that. And if I ask things you don’t want to answer simply tell me I wont be offended in the slightest.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 5:55pm

      @sleazy, I am relatively speaking conservative but I would say if I am it is just right of center. I do depart from conservatism to certain degrees and I think I would describe myself as a social libertarian. My roots come from a more liberal place but both I and my family have become more conservative as the state of the country and world has changed. The most conservative part of my position is fiscally. If we move toward a world of dependence on government we continuously lose freedom. The left is as blind to this truth as the right is that homosexuality is not a choice.

      Report Post »  
    • Warpspeedpetey
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 6:59pm

      @Moderation

      P1: It‘s painfully obvious that it isn’t “surety” because there are millions of people who “believe” just like you, yet don’t go out of their way to type God as G-d.

      C1: Yes I know it’s superstition.

      +Your statement here is non sequitur. Other peoples beliefs do not infer anything about mine.

      The reason it bothers me is because your superstitions and mysticism impact mine and other’s life.

      I assume you vote? Do you vote along your religious beliefs? If so, you and your cult try to create and pass legislation to force others to live around what you believe your God said is moral and immoral.

      + So we should live by your morals instead? Atheist “morals” murdered more than 100,000,000 people in just the last century. Atheist societies correlate very highly with genocide. Why should amoral atheists be allowed to participate in the political process when even the average felon cannot? It seems strange to me to think that we would allow an ideology steeped in the blood of innocents to even participate in the public square.

      Even worse the only laws you really want to change are the ones about perversion. The rest you don’t care about.

      I‘m sorry that I don’t want the world to go back to the days when it was ruled by people who accepted that things like magic and witches are things that exist.

      + I certainly don’t believe in magic. I don’t know any Christian who does. What a strange thing to say.

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:06pm

      @ CESIUM…Well I think we could definitely agree on the fiscal portion of what you have stated, freedoms are being eroded at very quick rates anymore. Is it safe to assume, given your previous explanations, that you are for a small centralized government?

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • Warpspeedpetey
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:08pm

      @cesium

      You state: …homosexuality is not a choice

      Then why do so many people claiming to be homosexual have children? Why have almost all of them had sexual contact with the opposite gender? It seems to me that it is a choice as demonstrated by the empirical evidence. When it was convenient they chose to perform heterosexual acts, how is it that heterosexuality could be a choice but not homosexuality? Is homosexuality just an attraction? Then why should any rights accrue to a sexual attraction? The idea that homosexuality is not a choice just doesn’t jibe with the rest the empirical data.

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:11pm

      As small as possible the way our founders intended.

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:19pm

      @warspeedy.I have no idea what it’s like to be homosexual, but I do know I, like most people I have done things in life that are expected of me that I did not like no matter how many times I tried. For a homosexual to have sex with the opposite sex is a relative neutral thing that is not met with the same level of condemnation, so it’s easy to test themselves before they face a world of bigotry. You can have sex with a jar of dog food if you want. If you choose to be homosexual you also choose to be one of the most victimized and condemned minorities in this society. Why would anyone want that or choose to go toward that? There are weird straight people who have “choosen” to do homosexual things in their lives and never again, in the same way a gay person chooses to have heterosexual sex with a person or whatever else mimicks the machinery. That is where the choice lies. Why do homosexual people want children? What does sexual preference have anything to do with wanting to be a father or mother? Some anthropologists suggest homosexuality is trait (pre biblical) where you could have a man that stayed with the women to raise children and provide added muscular strength while the hetrosexual men hunted and did not worry about being jealous of homosexual men spending time with their women all day. They could help raise kids lift logs. Obviously to pass onhomo genes there would have to be promiscuity at times, and you can imagine any scenario for human drama in between.

      Report Post »  
    • Warpspeedpetey
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:02pm

      @cesium

      Having sexual relations with the opposite gender proves that homosexual activity is a choice, falsifying claims to the contrary. You may say it is simply a desire or a preference, but then it becomes nothing but another fetish. Nothing about a fetish accrues any civil rights or eliminates any question of morality.

      Report Post »  
    • Aix_sponsa
      Posted on August 7, 2012 at 1:30pm

      @Sleazy and Cesium-

      Great discussion guys. Wish more people were as reasonable as you two.

      Report Post »  
  • Zurich
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:24pm

    If I am not wrong, Freeman had a terrible car accident a few months ago, so he may be suffering from some kind of frontal lobe dementia – which would explain why he is delusional. I wonder if he knows the history of his own last name and if not he should read some American History. You are free man!!!!!

    Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:05pm

      @Zurich, read my comments above and then we’ll reconsider who is delusional

      Report Post »  
  • lukerw
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:03pm

    Give Em… some Money… some worshipping Fans… and they think they are Gods!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • steelertim
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:03pm

    wow…almost all actors have lost their minds

    Report Post »  
    • ConservativeCanucklehead
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:27pm

      You either did not read or did not bother to try to understand his comments. Typical reflexive, closed-minded response of a “believer”.

      Report Post »  
    • burnteye86
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:37pm

      From what I’ve seen, it’s the unbelievers who are closed minded.

      Report Post » burnteye86  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:04pm

      In other words, as the Jewish mystics surmised before applied quantum physics, is that the entirety of the universe, the matter, the energy, including humans is god. Only humans as part of the universe can say I AM GOD. The matter and energy always existed always will. My conception of christians and muslims is that somehow they think they are outside the universe, when they fail to realize all the same matter and energy that makes up a black hole makes up them. all the elements in their bodies produced billions of years ago in exploding stars, and they have the audacity to assume they are more special and evolution doesn’t apply to them. Morgan Freeman, you are god, and so I am! The one god the culmination of the universe. that is the god Jews talk about… Not christians, Not muslims, not mormons, not christian scientists.. fantasy religions. This is why being Jewish is not requisite on faith… Yours truly – A Jewish Atheist!

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 8:55pm

      @ Cesium…..you stated, if I understand you right, that matter and energy always existed…You do realize this is an impossibility? It is absolutely impossible for 2 reasons. If the universe, and therefore the energy within it, has always existed, in other words is eternal, then why hasn’t all energy run out according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics? Also, in order to get to the present in an infinitely old universe, an infinite amount of time would have to be crossed. But, it is impossible to cross an infinite amount of time to get to now. These problems would also mean that there could not be an infinite amount of past cycles of the universe where it expands and contracts forever. So, those explanations can’t work. If you say that matter and energy simply existed in different forms before a universe did that produces another problem in addition to the previous two. If the necessary conditions for the cause of the universe have always existed within the pre-existent matter and energy, then the effect of the universe being formed is a necessary result of that matter and energy, and the universe would have been formed an infinitely long time ago. But this can’t work since it would mean the universe would have already run out of useable energy by now (2nd law of thermodynamics), not to mention the perpetual problem of crossing an infinite amount of time to get to now. So, that explanation doesn’t work either.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 9:14pm

      @ CESIUM….”The universe is an organism. Physicists show that energy comes into and goes out of existence without a creator.” This is a intellectual misrepresentation of the reality of where science is in regards to this topic. You have fallaciously made seem as if this has a bearing on your explanantion. Virtual particles are constrained to have short lives because they represent an increase in the energy of the universe; Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle affords room for sufficiently short-lived virtual particles, but long-lived ones appearing in a universe such as ours would violate the first law of thermodynamics. The objection is that when the physicists refer to “nothing,” they are, in fact, referring to something other than the literal absence of anything. So your dilemma still exists because you have not overcome the problem I presented to you initially.

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
    • steelertim
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:44am

      LOL….again ,,,,this is hilarious…

      Report Post »  
    • steelertim
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:47am

      as for my closed mindedness….he may be god,in his own little universe that exists between his ears.

      Report Post »  
    • SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:03am

      @ CESIUM…again thank you for taking the time to engage me on this topic. I have been seeing patients so it has taken a bit to respond…..If god has no beginning and no end then the only god that can exist is one without intelligence since there has to be a ”first thought.” Energy does not have to have a thought to exist without beginning…….This is a fallacious arguement in that the singularity would face a similar paradox in that there had to be a time when it either did not exist or it has always existed both exhaustive possibilities face the same issues previously discussed in the line of causes. If it did not exist then there had to be a cause befor it did and therefore “something” that started that cause. If it always existed then we have the problems with eternality. The fallacy rests in the infinite regression argument of which position either God or Universe ex nihlo faces. If no 1st cause exists then there can be no 2nd or thrid cause and on and on and yet we exist based on cuasal determination. So both you and I face 1st causal dilemmas. I choose to believe that an intelligent designer that is independent of time and therefore creator of time, is able to be the 1st cause of the phenomona we observe scientifically as this makes more logical sense given the dilemmas of causes…..Continued…

      Report Post » SLEAZYHIPPOs ILLEGITIMATE OFFSPRING  
  • denkat56
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:50pm

    walk the walk, dont just talk the talk.

    Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:14pm

      You mean defy the laws of physics? what like.. stick —> snake? Fire + bush = 0 combustion? 150-250 lb man walking on water?

      Report Post »  
    • 4truth2all
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 5:52pm

      Yo Cesium;

      If I make the lock I know the combination …

      Report Post »  
    • Cesium
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:47am

      You’re saying an intelligence made the universe so that this magic intelligence can also disrupt the physical laws of that universe? Who made this intelligence? This intelligence just always was? That suggests this intelligence never had a “first thought” and has always “thought.” You see this is impossible.. If you could ask this intelligence: what was: the thought before that thought.. the thought before that thought…the thought before that thought.. the thought before that thought… the thought before that that.. Do you remember those “early god days before you thought about making the unverse?“ ”what about before that, what where you thinking god?“ ”and before you were thinking that?“ ”and before that one?” no, the thought that lead to that thought” and the thought that led to that thought?” Maker of the lock? Masterlock.com

      Report Post »  
    • 4truth2all
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 3:05pm

      Yo Cesium:

      More like … Master.com … but a bible will do

      What if time is A CREATION ..a measurment the created are to live it … in Genesis, God is not just creating the elements, animals and “nature”, but also time…. minutes, hours, days, months, years. The universe is God’s clock … kinda makes grandfather clocks look puny … we wear ours on our wrists.

      God always was … no beginning and no end … hard to comprehend, I know … but then we are limited in OUR intelligence which is why we make computers and not planets.

      Report Post »  
  • Carlinpa
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:50pm

    Freeman fits the verse 2 Timothy 3:1-5 His lack of belief in God and arrogance allows him to marry his granddaughter. He’s just a racist pervert.

    Report Post »  
  • WhiteFang
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:37pm

    Blaze’s comment : “Oscar award-winning actor Morgan Freeman played the role of God convincingly in “Bruce Almighty”

    I must be really dense because I was not convinced. I was not fooled.

    Morgan, really, this is embarrassing.

    Report Post » WhiteFang  
  • teebubba
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:35pm

    People keep bringing that William Jennings Bryan quote out about “6000 years” a lot this week even though those “godless Chinese” have 10,000 years of recorded dynasty history. Maybe what Morgan Freeman really is trying to say but hasn’t expressed adequately is that God exists in all of us and that our organized religions are portals which help us recognize and bring his existence out in a meaningful way. No….that’s giving another Hollywood egotist too much credit.

    Report Post » teebubba  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:55pm

      Tee…You are full of it. They do not have 10K years of recorded history…what a lie you will believe, I suppose you voted for obama too though…

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • Simple-James
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:33pm

      @BAD
      How do you explain human remains/fossils found in ethiopia? They have been carbon dated (using scientifically proven methods) to show to be 200,000 +/- years old.

      Report Post » Simple-James  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 5:18pm

      @SIMPLE-JAMES

      Get your science out of here! lol

      Also I find it hilarious to see a person who accepts the nonsense expressed in the Bible say to someone else , “what a lie you’ll believe!”

      Report Post »  
    • welloddyfriggindah
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 8:13pm

      Simple-James, the science is not as settled as one might think with regards to carbon 14 dating. It loses it’s reliabilty beyond 5700-ish years. There are at least dozens of places to read up on it.
      http://contenderministries.org/evolution/carbon14.php

      Report Post » welloddyfriggindah  
    • Simple-James
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 8:21pm

      @WELLODDYFRIGGINDAH
      Thank you for your input. Your point?

      Report Post » Simple-James  
    • Simple-James
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 8:29pm

      @WELLODDYFRIGGINDAH
      Tell me, do you believe the world is 6,000 years old? If so; Why?

      Report Post » Simple-James  
    • The_Doors_Of_Perception
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:34pm

      @welloddy

      There are many more ways to date things other than carbon dating.

      Report Post » The_Doors_Of_Perception  
  • Ledger
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:34pm

    He was partially right when he said we are made in the image of God. But he is wrong when he says he is God. Just as a drop of sea water may have the same attributes as the ocean, the drop is not the ocean. The existence of God can not be proved through any material method, but God can be found through deep and sustained introspection, meditation, and prayer. God does not have to prove himself to man, it is man who must prove himself to God. These people are rare. Out of one thousand, one seeks Me, and out of one thousand who seeks Me, one finds Me (or something like that).

    Report Post » Ledger  
    • petratical
      Posted on July 23, 2012 at 8:09pm

      I think you may be referring to Jeremiah 29:13 “you shall seek me and find me, when you shall search for me with all of your heart” This is what Morgan needs to do , but he has to get self out of the way. Thats called humility . God demands that !

      Report Post »  
  • FreedomsFury
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:32pm

    He must be hanging out with Glenn Beck dont you remember back when Beck was on FoxNews he went of on a little New Age Mormon fantasy about how he is GOD, and how when the BIBLE says not to take The NAME of GOD in vain, Beck says “you know GOD wasnt just talking about taking HIS
    NAME and saying it as a curse word, but you should never say ! Am stupid or I Am not able to do this”. Dont you see his New Age crap he is putting off on us, trying to say saying something bad about yourself is saying something bad about GOD because we are gods, or in the case of Mormonism we will become gods if we do everything the Mormon Church tells you to do. There is only one GOD and if you Believe on HIS SON JESUS CHRIST you will have Eternal Life, in HEAVEN
    in the Presence of The LORD Praising and Worshipping all day long, not off on our own living on our very own spirit planet populated by our spirit babies. If that is your dream for HEAVEN I have got a suggestion, fall to your knees, cry unto the LORD for Repentance and Salvation in The NAME of JESUS CHRIST HE will Deliver you, and you can be in a Relationship with HIM and know HIM more and more everyday, if you know HIM I dont think you would be dreaming of HEAVEN as just another planet you live on, except it is your very own planet WooHoo, but your still seperated from HIS Presence, how exactly is that HEAVEN. If you want more on Glenn Becks New Age check 7 wonders to change your life by Beck and Avlow,as they tell you how there is no h

    Report Post »  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 5:36pm

      Are you even a Christian? Have or do you ever the Bible? In Exodus when God is speaking to Moses God’s his name over and over again.

      “I am” Exodus 3 13-15 Moses said to God “Suppose I go to the Israelites and and say to them, The God of your Fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, What is his name? Then what shall I tell them? 14God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM” This is what you are to say to the Israelites. “I AM has sent me to you.” 15 God also said to Moses, “Say to the Istaelites, The Lord, the God of your fathers – the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob – has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, the name by which I AM to be remembered from generation to generation.

      Read this for yourself in any version of the Bible you want. God’s name is “I am”! God is his title. He is our God. Not be confuse with the notion that you are God himself. Remember that we are to be God’s hands and feet, through Christ God is now not just in a temple but in our hearts and that we are to treat our bodies like a temple.

      I’m no Mormon nor do I agree their theology but however Glenn was and is right this issue. If we can supposedly be able to anything through Christ and Christ is suppose to be in us, then who are you to tell your self that you can not achieve something?

      Read your Bible.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 6:01pm

      @Freedomsfury You just seem ready to bash Glenn for his Mormon beliefs without even listen to truth that he is saying. I have read and researched Mormon theology and there is defiantly stuff that I would never agree with like altering a few passages in the Bible(which they say they restored) and all or anything the contradicts the Old and New Testament. Which it is one of the reasons alter/restore a couple of passages so their added Testament would not be a contradiction.

      For the most part they worship the same God of the Old and New Testament. They know and believe who God is of the New and Old Testament like we do but not necessarily what he is. The what has something do with alien planets and crap.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • WhiteFang
      Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:28pm

      The-Real-Enrico,

      Have you read Psalms 83:18 in the KJV ?
      Or Exodus 6:3 ?
      Or Isaiah 12:2, 26:4 ?

      Report Post » WhiteFang  
  • myway
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:30pm

    He is a legend in his own mind! Please send three dollars that is $3.00 to have dinner with God and the King of Gods.

    Please print and save.

    Report Post » myway  
  • NOBALONEY
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:29pm

    ‘Bruce Almighty’ has gone to his head!

    Report Post » NOBALONEY  
  • WhiteFang
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:26pm

    Morgan Freeman is special. Far above all other men.

    Report Post » WhiteFang  
    • RetiredAmericanNavyTaxpayer
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:59pm

      Shirley the Loon aka Shirley McLaine was saying that years before Morgan.

      Must suck to come in second place to a white woman, doesn’t it. ( Oops, racist undertone there. )

      Report Post » RetiredAmericanNavyTaxpayer  
  • rickc34
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:24pm

    Just because you played God does not mean you are God, get the padded cell ready. You have become a racist, you accuse people of racism that do not agree with Obama.

    Report Post »  
  • South Philly Boy
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:21pm

    he’s a god to his OWN UNIVERSE

    Report Post » South Philly Boy  
  • redrolr
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:20pm

    Woman from a man’s rib…different “levels” of heaven…everything that “is” magically appearing due to one entity’s desire and design…ritualistic comsumption of “the body and blood of Christ” and Morgan Freeman’s views are “oddball”? Really?

    Report Post »  
    • FreedomsFury
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:57pm

      I take it you probably are a decieved evolution believer so I will ask one simple question I got many. If evolution is something real why did Darwin write about evolution “if microscopic cells arent simple noncomplex organism, the Theory of evolution is wrong” I got news for you cells are beyond Complex we have no idea how they even know how they do all that they do, but guess what evolution is still being taught though, or here is a simpler question If evolution is real where does DNA and Protien come from since you need DNA to make Protien, and Protien to make DNA so which exactly evolved first? I got news for you there is ONE True Living GOD, YAHWEH, and ONE SAVIOR for all of us dirty sinners JESUS CHRIST and just because you dont want to believe on HIM so you can keep living how ever you want doesn’t change the fact that you are appointed to die once and then Judgement, so my question is do you think you can stand before a Perfect GOD on Judgement, I pray
      your Heart will be soften, call on HIS HOLY NAME and come into a Relationship with The GOD who gave you Life and gave HIS so HE could Save your life, Repent, Call on JESUS CHRIST HE who knew no sin but became sin for you and me, so we can be with HIM for Eternity, shedding HIS Blood on The Cross for without the shedding of Blood there is no Remission of sin, when we stand in GOD’s Presence upon Judgement the Blood JESUS will cover us to make us Accepted and Worthy, and have HIS HOLY SPIRIT upon you while you live he

      Report Post »  
    • Ledger
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 3:48pm

      These are all good points, and they show you are thinking. But God cannot be proved or disproved with mental gymnastics. The intellect is too crude an instrument to perceive God. Just as the existence of the mind cannot be proved with physical instruments, the existence of Spirit cannot be proved with the mind. The instrument of the mind is too crude to grasp the truth of God’s existence. Most people either blindly believe what they are taught, or reject what they do not understand. But God can be proved in your own life. Many of the sacred verses that you scoff at are poorly understood analogies. Analogies are necessary to explain something to others that they have not experienced for themselves. For example, how would you explain the taste of chocolate to someone who has never tasted it?” It is like…..” Even more difficult would be to ask someone to explain the taste of chocolate to a person in a different language, from a different culture, and two thousand years in the future. But once you taste the chocolate, there is no further need for explanation. It is in the realm of your knowledge. So it is with God. God is real. Evolution is real. There is no contradiction except in the different belief systems of people. I can tell you that the experience of God far exceeds anyone’s ability for explanation. They are left with analogies until such time as they receive a “taste” for themselves. Get busy and begin on the path to taste God for yourself.

      Report Post » Ledger  
  • Yaya2
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:19pm

    Oh, great! Another Hollyweird-o to put on my”don’t waste my time”list. The ego is much larger than the talent. Good riddance!!!

    Report Post »  
  • Max jones
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:15pm

    I believe I’ve heard this viewpoint before….It is Luciferian. Mr. Freeman will soon find out the difference between himself and God. Repent, Morgan. There is still time.

    Report Post » Max jones  
  • welloddyfriggindah
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:13pm

    I support and would fight to support Mr. Freeman’s right to believe whatever he believes.

    Report Post » welloddyfriggindah  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:10pm

      If it is true (which I’m inclined to think it is) would you support Morgan Freeman’s right to believe it was okay to do the hanky panky with his step granddaughter from his first marriage starting while she was a teen… ??

      It‘s widely believed that Freeman and his step granddaughter from his first wife were doing the tango and if I’m not mistaken were preparing to get married last year.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • Simple-James
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 4:43pm

      @TIME
      This isn’t an US Weekly blog, but thank you for the pop-culture update.

      Report Post » Simple-James  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 5:25pm

      SIMPLE. Know your enemy. I see Morgan Freeman as the enemy. If you don’t think that the Obama supporting, while at the same time Obama insulting (doesn’t quite think Obama is Black enough for his taste) Morgan Freeman who called the Tea Party racist has a few screws loose and my comment is nothing more than a “pop-culture update” then I say… stick with being SIMPLE-JAMES.

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • Simple-James
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 7:08pm

      lol. awesome.

      Report Post » Simple-James  
    • Simple-James
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 7:13pm

      Your initial post (that I commented on) said nothing of Obama. Just the incestual rhetoric. And now you are changing the subject of argument in an effort to be right about something….anything to justify your trolling. Your comments on incest do nothing but show your willingness to stoop to the liberal level, as well as showcase your enjoyment of supermarket tabloids.

      I will continue to be simple. You should try it sometime.

      Report Post » Simple-James  
    • welloddyfriggindah
      Posted on July 8, 2012 at 7:52pm

      O boy! My comment is that I support religious freedom in America. I don’t keep track of Hollywoods antics. My family has shed a lot off blood to protect our liberty.

      I’ll let you be in charge of the tin foil hat brigade dumba$$.

      Report Post » welloddyfriggindah  
  • TAXEVERYONE
    Posted on July 8, 2012 at 2:06pm

    Is it true he eats dog with Obama?

    Report Post » TAXEVERYONE  
    • blackyb
      Posted on July 10, 2012 at 9:52pm

      Just his step grandaughters if they don’t marry him.

      Report Post » blackyb  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love