‘I Misspoke’: GOP Senate Nominee Clarifies ‘Legitimate Rape’ Remarks
- Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:37pm by
Becket Adams
- Print »
- Email »
Republican U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin (Mo.) made headlines Sunday when he said the following during a KTVI-TV interview: “First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape is] really rare … If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
“But let‘s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something — you know, I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child,” he added.
[Related: GOP Senate Nominee: Victims of ‘Legitimate Rape’ Rarely Get Pregnant]
Needless to say, these remarks were poorly received on both sides of the political spectrum, prompting the GOP senate candidate to issue the following statement:
As a member of Congress, I believe that working to protect the most vulnerable in our society is one of my most important responsibilities, and that includes protecting both the unborn and victims of sexual assault. In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it’s clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year. Those who perpetrate these crimes are the lowest of the low in our society and their victims will have no stronger advocate in the Senate to help ensure they have the justice they deserve.
I recognize that abortion, and particularly in the case of rape, is a very emotionally charged issue. But I believe deeply in the protection of all life and I do not believe that harming another innocent victim is the right course of action. I also recognize that there are those who, like my opponent, support abortion and I understand I may not have their support in this election.
But I also believe that this election is about a wide-range of very important issues, starting with the economy and the type of country we will be leaving our children and grandchildren. We’ve had 42 straight months of unacceptably high unemployment, trillion dollar deficits, and Democratic leaders in Washington who are focused on growing government, instead of jobs. That is my primary focus in this campaign and while there are those who want to distract from that, knowing they cannot defend the Democrats’ failed economic record of the last four years, that will continue to be my focus in the months ahead.
Here’s the original interview:
Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter
Front page photo source courtesy the AP.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (237)
lylejk
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:49pmI hope it’s not too late to get a replacement for this Democrat mole. Idiot he is. You suppose to step carefully over manure you idiot. Oh well. Looks like McCaskill will get her job back which is a darn shame. :)
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:06pmIt’s getting late kids 4 ur 1st day @ school , go 2 bed .
Report Post »Alvin691
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:50pmYou know nothing about this situation. It shows.
Report Post »Ron_WA
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 11:29pmYeah, we can kiss this senate seat goodbye – idiot
Report Post »Leadthemtothelight
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 11:52pmlol…..apparently he was reading from the Biden playbook…..ooops
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:08am@ Lylejk
Report Post »The NJ Dems were able to replace Toreccelli on the ballot a few years back — even though that was absolutely not permitted by the NJ statutes. That was the Democrats in New Jersey, though — and Clinton was able to pressure Torch to agree to dropping his bid. Unlikely that Missouri will be able to get a similar alignment to have a chance at a Senate seat pick-up.
As for “liberal plant” and other comments about this guy, I know nothing about him except for this bone-headed statement. Guys make bone-headed comments all the time without being “moles”, “plants” or whatever.
Jaycen
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:30am@lylejk
Respectfully, you don’t have a clue.
Todd Akin is my Representative, and he’s about as Constitutional Conservative as they come. He voted against NDAA, the Debt Ceiling Increase, etc. I met him recently, and he rattled off 18 founding fathers like it was nothing.
The man knows history and relgion, too. Except for the Communists in north St. Louis and Kansas City, Akin should have no problem beating Claire.
Report Post »Raging_Waters
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:44amRegarding his “legitimate” rape comment: He’s right. There’s a lot of unstable women who consentually engage in intercourse with a guy they desire, then get pregnant (sometimes on purpose), only to find out the guy doesn’t like them as much, and then they pull out the rape card for spite. Anyone who doesn’t understand the SICK direction our society has taken is in complete denial. Rape is a despicible act, but the child doesn’t deserve the punishment, the rapist does. Liberals just seem to love killing babies for whatever reason they can find.
‘She was raped. Kill it.’
‘The child’s deformed. Kill it.’
‘The woman can’t support a child right now. Kill it.’
‘She didn’t want to get pregnant right now. Kill it.’
Tolerance: What’s your limit?
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 1:05am@ Raging Waters:
Report Post »“Regarding his “legitimate” rape comment: He’s right.”
Ummm . . . no.
I get what you are saying and what he was saying, and I basically concur.
But … “legitimate” RAPE ??? How do those two words even occur in the same SENTENCE let alone “legitimate” as an adjective for “rape”???
“genuine”, “actual” and maybe 6 other words in the English language (we have the largest vocabulary in the world, you know) but “legitimate”?? Obama was more accurate to talk about having visited 57 states than for someone to talk about “legitimate rape.” After all, states can be added to bring the number up to 57 (or more) states — but there is NO WAY that rape can ever be “legitimate.”
Raging_Waters
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 1:26am@Chuck
Report Post »I agree he could’ve used a better word. But “legitimate” can mean “genuine” or “actual.” And I took it as just that. But people need to understand that there can be false accusations of rape and sometimes pregnancy is involved. So I won’t ostracize him for this.
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 1:48am@CHUCK STEIN
Report Post »It depends on hat context he was using. If a girl was saying a guy raped her, but the guy says it was consensual, and a jury finds that it was, indeed, rape, then that makes it a legitimate rape.
Baron_Doom
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 2:07amAmen, Raging_Waters. This comment is being blown way out of proportion. I actually agree with him 100%. There are plenty of women who falsely claim they are raped. Point in case is a woman named Wanetta Gibson who put a guy behind bars and won 1.5 million in a lawsuit. She eventually came clean after the guy was released five years later… but she got to keep the 1.5 million. Absurd.
Report Post »iamhungry
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 2:50am@Chuck, Just so you know. The reason Obama said 57 states is that there are 57 separate primary elections during the Democratic primary season. There are 7 more than the states due to Puerto Rico, Overseas, Washington DC, etc having their own contests too.
Report Post »Simonne
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:11amHe is an idiot. After that remark, I don’t know how he can win this election.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:43am@raging_Waters
Liberals also think there’s a return policy on children. AFTER the child is born, if you decide you don’t want it, you can kill it. Remember, Cass Sustein says it‘s not a person until it’s two and you’ve invested money and time into it.
Report Post »MittensKittens
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 7:50amFocus you ******* morons…We have bigger things to worry about…GEEZ, is the majority population in the US adhd?
Report Post »koyettsu
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:11amI am tired of the misspoke excuse, you did not misspoke you are simply an idiot.
Report Post »obrien871
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:15amCan‘t believe Akin won the nomination this should’ve been extremely easy win McCaskill is the worst. Voted for John Brunner, former Marine, and great businessman he was beating McCaskill by 11 points in a head to head match. Unfortunately there was another candidate running a woman that was running ads with Sarah Palin supporting her that split the vote so Akin slipped in. Pretty dmn depressing that we could‘ve had a businessman that’s created real jobs instead of a bonehead politician.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:30amIs there EVER a time sarah palin does NOT support a woman running against a man in the primaries? (Seriously, I don’t know, but I’ve never, ever seen it.)
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 9:37amThe yo-yo‘s in the ’show me state’ are gonna reelect that Socialist, Statist, Progressive for this comment? how stupid can they be………if he loses, he needs to be hung!!
Report Post »encinom
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 10:52amKeep him, I mean him and Ryan (despite Ryan’s lie this weekend to the contrary) hold the same views on rape and abortion (he and Ryan sponsored anti-choice, anti-women legislation together).
Report Post »ktmrider1
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:37pmyou just misspoke yourself out of a senate seat dumb ass- next!
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:45pmliberal dope
Report Post »Ray2447
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:47pmThe only thing I want to know is, “Can you still ‘walk it back’ after you’ve gone over a cliff?” :-/
Report Post »PeachyinGA
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:55pmSorry … “I mis-spoke” only works if you are a democrat. Hope you have a ‘day job’.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:57pmNot over yet , so don’t count ur eggs yet, wishfull lib.
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:59pmwhy not the demo rats do it every day. you people just want to throw under the bus. ya that works real well time to give it back to the libs
Report Post »TomSawyer
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:34pmI agree. As a conservative, not a fake liberal posting here, I do not want to defend a guy that says stupid things like this. It is so stupid to say what he said I wonder if Todd Akin isn’t a progressive plant trying to sabotage the election. Romney and Ryan felt it necessary to make a statement of disagreement on this issue. Showing it can effect their campaign.
Report Post »soybomb315_II
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 11:40pmthis is what happens when you nominate so called conservatives who want to do the whole anti-abortion and gay marriage as their meat and potatoes. Would have been better to nominate a republican who talks about debt, spedning, unconstitutional federal programs, and liberty (things which the left cannot win on). When a candidate strays from those things – chaos ensues
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 3:22amSOYBOMB315_II — you are on the mark. The modern conservative party is more concerned about controlling what women and gays do than they are our outrageous spending or the increasing government intrusions upon on our liberties. They only pay lip-service to liberty and limited government; conservatives are every bit as much for big government as progressives.
Report Post »Six_Seven_and_No
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:32pmAll I could think when I saw the headline was “please don’t let it be Akin”. I just hope McCaskill is as hated as I think she is and he can still win.
Report Post »TomSawyer
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:43pmNope. Todd Akin’s raw stupidity is going to cost Republicans the Senate. No matter what you ideology, you should not want someone as stupid as Todd Akin in the senate.
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:53pm@ tomsawyer:
…said the token lefty liberal.
Report Post »TomSawyer
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:09pmgrayling646, You have made an error. I am a right wing conservative that has never ever voted for a democrat ever in 30 years of voting.
Report Post »Baron_Doom
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 2:15am@TomSawyer – Akin is far from stupid, unlike your bandwagon comment. Be a lemming if you must, but Akin will be vindicated, especially after this comment blows over… probably when Biden makes his next gaffe.
Report Post »Contrarian51
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 2:43pm@TOMSAWYER: So you‘re saying we’ll be better off with Dirty Claire just because Akin made a stupid mistake and allowed himself to be dragged into a topic that won’t make one bit of difference in this election?
Every avid pro-life and pro-choice voter isn’t going to be swayed by anything anyone says. Why these politicians don’t just say, “Look, there aren‘t 5 voters in the country who haven’t already made their minds up about the social issues, so can we please get back to the economy, jobs and taxes?”
Report Post »marybethelizabeth
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 2:57pmWhy support Mr. Akin when he backtracks and disavows what most of you Keys believe?
Will you never find a person with a backbone to represent you?
Report Post »Parrid1
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:30pmHey don’t laugh, but this stuff has been studied. Just google it and you may be surprised by what different conclusions were drawn from the different studies. This guy being prolife might just be highlighting results that he is more comfortable with.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:37pmHow about -you- show us these studies, like women’s bodies can keep them from getting pregnant through sheer willpower. You’re the one claiming they exist, after all.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:45pmHe didn’t “misspeak.” He spoke. Watch the video. He make the distinction between “legitmate” rape and “illegitmate” rape (which I guess means women who deserve to get raped) and says doctors have told him most women don’t get pregnant when they are raped, so no problem with denying women the option to have a legal abortion rather than bear their rapist’s child.
Why do Republicans hate women? Why do they want to force them to bear the children of rapists or incestual rape by their Uncle? Why is it that old, rich, white guys want to force women to give birth when they are raped?
Little suprise that women aren’t overly enamored with the Republican party.
Todd, nice try. I see you have some PR people working for you. So perhaps you can try again to explain why you are against abortions in cases of “legtimate rape” which you I‘m sure you’ll define and explain how that differs from “illegitmate rape” and in cases of incest.
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:13pmUhhh… hmmmm, eh, cough cough. No way to defend this..uh, HE MUST BE A CLOSET DEMOCRAT/LIBERAL!!!
Report Post »Parrid1
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:24pmHey! Brain “locked”…. I didn’t say I believed it. Never heard such a thing this guy said in my life. The same Lib’s that rail on this subject of abortion are the ones doing the studies…..Psychology studies. Go look it up….
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:30pm@Parrid
” I didn’t say I believed it. Never heard such a thing this guy said in my life. The same Lib’s that rail on this subject of abortion are the ones doing the studies…..Psychology studies. Go look it up….”
My mistake, you don’t believe it. But you say it exists. So I repeat: why don’t -you- show us the studies?
Report Post »HoosierLady
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:16am@JZS And most of you. Am I the only person in the world that understands what he was thinking? Okay, let’s do this slowly…..First, with the legitimate rape thing, he was thinking that there are people that say that they were raped to either not make themselves look bad for murdering their child, or maybe they just want to use their situation to try to make a statistic for that group to try to keep the murder clinics open, because NOBODY has an agenda when it comes to these death clinics. Second, it‘s common knowledge that under an extremely stressful situation it’s not as easy to get pregnant. Ever talk to a couple desperately trying to get pregnant? I was one of them, you have to get rid of the stress first. This is most likely what he was talking about.
I am a woman who has been raped and molested and i would never kill an innocent child if I had gotten pregnant by an unwanted intruder. There are too many people out there that want a child to love even if I couldn’t keep it because of what their father did to me. To kill an innocent child because of the father is still a terribly selfish act.
As far as the republican party anti-woman thing. Get a grip and do your homework sweetie. Under the democrat party they have changed the mammogram recommendation age from 40 to 50 AND say that you only need a pap every 2 years, not every year. Just to get you ready so they can deny those to you under obamacare…& let’s not forget that they are using abortion as ge
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:29pmdo all you liberals think you can pull of trying to post as conservetives.
Report Post »Master.Debater
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:15amMy thoughts exactly. It is the total absence of rationality that gives them away. It is clear from the context of the sentence what his meaning was.
Report Post »TomSawyer
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:13pmI do not see any comment that appear to be liberals posing as conservatives. I see conservatives angry that they will lose a seat because the candidate threw the race and it is already over. He needs to drop out of the race asap.
Report Post »JUSTANOTHEROPINION
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:27pmWell, it’s water under the bridge now. Just move on is my first thought. My advice to these people if I could give it would be, when aked a question stop and consider your answer before you open your mouth. You know the old saying, they need to stopputting their mouth in gear before their brain.
Report Post »TRUTHandFREEDOM
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:41pmHis statement is good and will need to be an ad when his opponent runs the first statement in political ads over and over and over.
Report Post »Wango
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 11:12pmGuy is toast and the Republicans are stuck with him. All of the Republicans. Better yet, Romney and Ryan are pro abortion. They said so today . . . “Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin’s statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape,”
So, there you go. Now what? he he
Report Post »nobull14
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:26pmIf they let are scratch and sniff president Oturd and Biden get by ? Let the man have a second chance for having diarrhea of the mouth ?. maybe he did miss speak ?
Report Post »henryKnox
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:23pmI wish they would listen to the Tea Party. The GOP is going to grab defeat from the jaws of victory. We supported Sarah Steelman and I couldn’t understand how akin won. We can’t continue to give seats to the Progressives or we will not have a free country to live in.
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:26pmanother liberal
Report Post »Doug Piranha
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:20pmPro lifers are more interested in changing hearts than in changing laws. If we can succeed in doing the former, the latter will be a moot point.
That said, Akin should withdraw for the good of the country and the MO GOP should find a way to get Steelman on the ballot.
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:27pmyou wish liberal
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:17pmThere is NO SUCH WORD OR TERM as “misspoke”.
The left made it up to cover their every flashing butts in the air when they got caught in LIES.
Hellooooo.
If somebody on the right is “misspeaking”, he or she or they belong on the left, not the right.
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:57pmMisspoke (definition):express yourself unclearly: to speak or express yourself in a way that is inappropriate, inaccurate, or unclear.
You misspoke.
Report Post »Robert999
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:16pmI bet a lot of girls say they were raped and get abortions when it was voluntary sex just for the convenience of not having to face the repercussions of their actions. So they murder their baby just to escape the results of their own wrongdoing.
Report Post »freeberty
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:29pmYour absolutely right Robert, hopefully once abortion is made illegal, those woman taking that life through an illegal abortion or miscarriage will face the death penalty for their actions.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:37pmMotherhood should not be a punishment; it should be a blessing. Someone doesn’t need to claim they were raped to get an abortion (in most states, at least). And for the record, according to FBI statistics only 8% of rape claims turn out to be unfounded. Unfortunately, only 25% of rape cases lead to an arrest.
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:55pmHow do you even compare miscarriage to a voluntary abortion? Do you even have a clue what you are talking about?
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:02pmNo one is asked for a reason why they desire to terminate a pregnancy,
Report Post »Certainly not up here up North and East,
It’s a legal medical procedure, Period.
freeberty
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:06pmusaMama
Once abortion is made illegal don’t you realize that “miscarriages” will skyrocket, Let the courts decide whether it is murder or not.
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:32pmMaybe, but I still don’t want to see people who have truly had a miscarriage be put through that kind of emotional trauma. If there is reason to believe they did it on purpose I suppose they could look into it but I already think we are too quick to charge parents for accidental death or injury to their children. I understand, sadly, some parents do murder their children but most do not. I don’t want to get to a place where innocent heartbroken parents are locked up after a tragedy.
Report Post »Robert999
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:43pmIf there is a miscarriage, there needs to at least be a coroner‘s inquest into the baby’s death to determine if it really was accidental, or deliberate, or if the mother did something to contribute to the baby’s death. Prosecutions will be necessary if it was anything but an absolutely accidental miscarriage.
Report Post »freeberty
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:47pmThere are stories in the paper of mothers murdering their children at least every month. Again when abortion is made illegal there will be a huge increase in miscarriages, we will have to agree to disagree on whether they ought to be investigated.
It’s pretty much a mote point, once the government decides that abortion is illegal, the next step will be to investigate increases in miscarriages.
Report Post »MamaKat961
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:06amWow! This thread is even more disturbing than what Akin said. What kind of Conservative wants to send the government poking into the most personal lives of young women who have suffered a miscarriage? So you want to bring in the Nanny State as soon as conception occurs? It’s bad enough every parent has to fear the state disapproving of their parenting or discipline of children but you want every pregnant woman living in fear of murder charges? How exactly will this muder be proven? What will it take? Who decides how “intentional” is defined? Maybe the woman did something she knew could be hazardous to the baby like driving or bicycling or hiking, and suffered a miscarriage. Will she be arrested because she “intentionally” engaged in an activity before the loss of her baby?
Report Post »As someone who suffered 3 miscarriages in order to have 3 healthy babies, this absolutely floors me. It is one of the most arrogant, misogynistic suggestions I’ve ever heard.
freeberty
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:16amMama
What do you think will happen when abortion is outlawed? A fetus will have rights just like any other person. Do you think the government will stop after shutting down a few abortion clinics? Are you for the law against abortion or not?
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:58amMamaKat thank you! I am sorry for your losses. You raise some very good concerns! As people who claim to be for small gov’t I am surprised they would even suggest this! I too had a miscarriage and it was hard enough to deal with without the gov’t getting involved. What about Obamacare and keeping gov’t out of our healthcare? This seems like the biggest invasion of patient/ doctor privacy ever suggested! If a doc has suspicion of foul play aren’t they obligated to say something anyway? Why single out grieving mothers if there is no reason to suspect foul play?
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:58amLocked – And if those women don’t want to become mothers (unless she gets raped), then she should either keep her legs closed, going on the pill, or getting her tubes tied. Excuse me if I don’t feel sorry for those women like you do.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 1:06amMamakat and Usamama – Miscarriages and abortions are two completely different things. Miscarriage is an accident while abortion is intentional.
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 1:33amGt R Done your preaching to the choir, tell that to FreeBerty and Robert999. They are the ones suggesting a woman who has a miscarriage be charged with murder! We are the ones telling them that’s insane!
Report Post »Robert999
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 3:01amI did not say that a woman who has a miscarriage should be charged with murder. If you put your child in a dangerous situation (for example, leaving them in a closed car in the summer sun or riding in the bed of a pickup) and the child dies, you can be charged with manslaughter or some other crime. The same should be true for an unborn child. If you are pregnant and you do something that you know (or should know) can endanger the baby you are carrying and results in a miscarriage, then you should be charged with a crime.
All I am saying is to treat the unborn child the same as a born child, and with the same rights. And that the parent has the same responsibilities.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 3:18amAbsolutely incredible…investigating mothers who miscarried as criminals. Conservatives are as much for limited government as progressives.
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 3:30amRobert, I get what you are saying sort of. But the parents of every child who dies do not automatically get charged with murder! Sometimes miscarriages happen and in most cases the cause is unknown. In my case the baby died at 5 wks gestational but I had what is called a “missed miscarriage” where my body didn’t realize it until I was 3 1/2 mos! My miscarriage happened in the morning of my uncles funeral which just so happened to be on the1 yr anniversary of my fathers funeral (brothers died on the same day a year apart, ironic isn’t it? And there I was, dressed in funeral black, sitting in the docs office being told the baby I had carried for 3 mos was dead). You want to talk about emotional, I was in a darker place that following week then I ever care to go again, and you would have the gov’t sicked on me and have me “investigated”! How very “progressive” of you! Some people may commit this crime so let’s just punish the collective with more big, intrusive laws and invasion of their privacy!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 5:50am@Git
Wow… “Don’t want to get pregnant? It’s not enough to say no: better get your tubes tied.”
I don’t know what you are, but it’s not a conservative. You want more government, not less. You’re as despicable as Robert.
… oh right, you’re a troll. Forgot about that.
Report Post »Master.Debater
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:35amFreeberty said, “It’s pretty much a mote point, once the government decides that abortion is illegal, the next step will be to investigate increases in miscarriages”
Is this an argument for maintaining the institution of government-sanctioned killing that currently exists?
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:00amGIT-R-DONE — don’t lie to us about your true feelings. We know who you are, and the perverted, poisonous ideology that guides you. Do not pretend you would have any sympathy for a rape-victim. In case of rape, you would tell us “she shouldn’t have been wearing those clothes,“ or ”she shouldn’t have accepted that ride,“ or ”had that drink,” or you’ll tell us, “obviously she wanted to have sex with that guy, or she would have fought harder.”
Then, like Akin, you‘d tell her she can’t have an abortion, because “if she was really raped, she wouldn’t be pregnant.” Or you will tell us that women shouldn’t be allowed emergency contraceptives after a rape, telling us the same thing, “she wouldn’t need them if she was really raped.” On top of calling them liars, you would to treat these rape victims as you do other women, referring them in the most vulgar of manner, you perverted little misogynist.
Oh yes, I know…I don’t agree with you and your disgusted, psychotic ideology, so I’m a Marxist. Blah, blah, blah. You’re boring, unthinking one-trick pony.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:02amGIT-R-DONE — hey, little pervert, why don’t you work at a rape-crisis center and tell those women to their faces they are sluts and whores. You won’t, because on top of being a little pervert, you are a sniveling little coward too.
Report Post »NO_MORE_OBAMA
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:14pmDING DING DING …. We finally found a republican dummer than Joe Biden.
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:25pmonly in your liberal mind
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:40pm& the lib’s r ready 2 hang this guy right away.
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:00pmWhat, just one.
Report Post »What about Louie Gohmert and the TERROR BABIES!!!
zoro51
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:11pmlook ass wipe IM a RAPE BABEY mom was 16.. get the HELL off the air if u act like BIDEN a BUFFON AMERICA n the GOP dont want YOU
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:38pmsay what
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:59pm@ Zoro gone bad, is hate speach ur MO ?
Report Post »freeberty
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:10pmHe was right the first time, your either for life or not, if he is elected hopefully he will bring a bill to Congress were it will be considered murder by the women for any miscarriage or abortion, and have a death penalty punishment for those found guilty.
If the miscarriage is considered an Act of God then the government should be able to sue the nearest church where the women lives.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:19pmAnd you were wrong the first time:
“This nominee is absolutely right your either for life or not”
Do you believe in the right to use lethal force in self-defense? If so, you’re qualifying which life has more value…. are you for life or not? Issues are never, ever, completely black and white.
“if he is elected hopefully he will bring a bill to Congress were it will be considered murder by the women for any miscarriage or abortion.”
Such a bill would be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court will need to decide the future of abortion in the US; right now, it’s legal and constitutional.
“If the miscarriage is considered an Act of God then the government should be able to sue the nearest church where the women lives.”
No one can sue God or a church for an “act of God.” Supernatural beings do not fall in the jurisdiction of the US (yes, courts have actually issued rulings saying that).
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:42pmfreeone just another liberal comon sence why heck that takes up to much of my pea brain.
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:44pmAre you sick? I sure hope you are trying to make some sort of twisted joke and aren’t serious!! I am 100% pro life, and agree the VOLUNTARY killing of babies should not be allowed, but as one who has suffered a miscarriage I am disgusted by your comment! It was the saddest most heart wrenching experience of my life, that’s like saying you would punish the parents for the death of their sick child. As though they could stop it from happening!!
I have 4 beautiful children, 3 on Earth and one in heaven whom I look forward to meeting some day! God help you and may He soften your calloused heart!
Report Post »freeberty
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:52pmUsaMama
No offense, I just think a court of law ought to decide whether a miscarriage was legitimate or not.
What do you think is going to happen after abortion is made illegal, there is going to be a huge increase in “miscarriages”
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:12pmOffense taken! If after I had my miscarriage some moron said to me “we have to investigate this to be sure you didn’t do this on purpose,” they would have been walking out of there with 2 black eyes, one from me and one from my husband!! That‘s all I’m gonna say, some people may induce abortion on their own but you don’t solve that by treating everyone who suffers that kind of a loss as a murderer! They will get their day in court, a Heavenly court.
Report Post »freeberty
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:23pmMama
My mistake, I thought you had said you were against abortion.There doesn’t have to be a doctor involved to cause an abortion.
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:55pmOk do NOT twist my words and accuse me of being pro-abortion! You said congress should QUOTE “bring a bill to Congress were it will be considered murder by the women for any miscarriage or abortion” I am saying that is wrong! If there is reason to believe a woman caused the death of her child intentionally in or outside of the womb then absolutely investigate it, but to charge every woman who suffers a miscarriage with murder NOT the way to handle it!
Report Post »just happy
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 11:15pmThe “right ” to an abortion isn’t in the constitution, and the prohibition shouldn’t be there either. Until the unborn are recognized as people with the rights of citizens, they have no rights. I believe they are people so no law is necessary for me. What is relevant and would make a big difference would be each of us living and advocating the values and principles of God.
Report Post »Trance
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:06pm“First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape is] really rare … If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
I’d read the same thing before. Is there new medical science that refutes this or says it was a hoax? Or is it just something we aren’t supposed to talk about?
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:10pmThat’s not how science works buddy. If you’re going to make a claim, you have to be able to provide evidence for it.
You don’t make baseless claims and then say, “prove me wrong.”
Report Post »antitheist
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:13pmThere’s no way for the human body to tell if it was rape, what makes you think the body would be able to tell the difference? Honestly, it sounds like something that would come out of abstinence only education.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:25pm“I’d read the same thing before. Is there new medical science that refutes this or says it was a hoax? Or is it just something we aren’t supposed to talk about?”
Sigh… it’s complete bunk. The human body cannot tell the difference. Some people might say “Well, a girl getting raped isn’t going to orgasm, and orgasm seems to slightly increase the chance of pregnancy!” Unfortunately, even THAT is false, as a 1979 study of rape victims found that a fair amount of them (41%) said they experienced arousal or orgasm during the rape, which in turn led to all sorts of psychological trauma later.
In short, this candidate is a moron repeating bad pseudo-scientific claims for which he refuses to apologize.
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:59pmIt’s silly talk.
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:58pmnope but who cares what they say im sure the trolls will be here soon demading his exacution.
Report Post »Want our country back
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:06pmWe‘ll gently remind the trolls that he’s ‘our’ Joe Biden….LOL
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:08pmI am a conservative and the guy’s statement was unbelievable. He needs to step down quickly,this election is too important to lose. We need to win the Senate and we can’t afford to lose a state that we were slated to win. Does Akins work for the Dems like Lugar? This fossil needs to go. The Dems will replay the tape over and over again and they will try to tie it to the presidential race. This guy is radioactive and Romney would not dare to campaign with him when he campaigns in MO. UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!! The Missouri GOP better do something quick!
Report Post »Toltepeceno
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:12pmWant our country back Good point, he still has a way to get to Joe Biteme’s level though.
Report Post »pissantno.10
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:51pmwell i guess his statment did not mean much to you ya your a liberal too
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 3:05amexEcution, hon
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:57pmI can understand saying he “misspoke” in reference to “legitimate rape.” It was poorly worded. But he didn’t even touch upon his idea that the female body can someone magically stop pregnancy in the case of rape. It doesn’t work like that… at all. And he never even touches that in his “clarification.”
The guy is done.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:05pmShould have been “can somehow” not “can someone”
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:13pmThe Republican party isn’t big on facts these days.
As someone else on here said in regards to what you’re talking about.
“I’d read the same thing before. Is there new medical science that refutes this or says it was a hoax? Or is it just something we aren’t supposed to talk about?”
They can make the baseless claims or “read it” somewhere, and it doesn’t have to be proven, but it has to be proven untrue.
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:48pmLocked has appontid hisself grammer police.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:02pm@Grayling
And you’ve appointed yourself… Pissant’s boot-licker? Not quite sure.
Report Post »tolerence
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 1:27pmonly 1% of all aborions are because of rape,and if DEMS really care about rape than why dont they say something to planned parenthood for talking the rape victim to not report the rapeist to the police because planned parenthood is more worried about the goverment money they get than going to court than the offender gets let go to repeat rape again and again! besides the paramount argumant is the baby is a human and did nothing wrong,so the baby is not only being dismembered but is being punished for the rape,its a tough argument to bring up for our GOP chickens,but as long as this country murders the innocent by the millions we aill always be cursed,in my opinion
Report Post »Stelex
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:55pmOk, legitamate rape is becoming iffy. I just read an article about the 4th sex……asexuals. So now not being sexual is a sexual orientation. But I’m confused cause we have Hetro, Bi, Gay, Lesbian, Transexual……..so far thats five near as I can tell, So asexual is sixth. I sense a freaky sexual war coming on. What about palygamists? or Necrofeliacs? Your hurting there feelings, Animal frs……come on……wheres it end. My brain hurts……
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:02pm“What about palygamists? or Necrofeliacs?”
… are those anything like polygamists or necrophiliacs?
“Hetro, Bi, Gay, Lesbian, Transexual……..so far thats five near as I can tell, So asexual is sixth.”
You’re conflating issues. Sexual attraction between humans, there has always been four: heterosexual (only find opposite sex attractive), homosexual (only find same sex attractive), bisexual (find both sexes attractive) and asexual (does not find any sex attractive). Of course, asexual is a bit misleading; it’s lack of sexual attractive, not really a type.
Gay and lesbian are both homosexuality. Transexual is a gender identity concept, not a type of attraction.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:03pmFrankly, I’d rather have a man who is opposed to abortion (and it’s true…it is rare where pregnancy results from rape. Rape is a horrible crime, don’t get me wrong. BUT who is better for MO? A man who opposes abortion and is a decent representative or a Senator who (in cahoots with her husband) ripped the people off? DUH. Get off his back.
Report Post »Stelex
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:17pmOk, you win. Your right. What ever your freaking point is. Your obviously missing THE POINT. Jesus Fn Christ. We are lost as a society. So which are you again????????
Report Post »Stelex
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:20pmRobin….is that you? Another woman I knew whom was a spellfreak? just checking.
Report Post »Stelex
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:27pmSeeing you’ve obviously given this lot and LOTS of thought. I submit to your hypersexuality. Let me know what the last person, place, thing, animal, mineral or jello you made it with. I’m sensing tree hugger here.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 10:32pm“Ok, you win. Your right. What ever your freaking point is. Your obviously missing THE POINT. Jesus Fn Christ. We are lost as a society.”
Please don‘t take the Lord’s name in vain. Sorry, what was the point? That you don’t understand sexual attraction? I might have missed it. More likely you didn’t have one.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:53pmSaying Iran when you mean Iraq is misspeaking. Introducing the next President when you mean Vice-President is misspeaking. Stating nonsense as fact is spewing bull, and saying later what you should have said the first time doesn’t change that.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:50pmGood Man!
Report Post »DonaldH
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:49pmLook, if abortion is the cure for an unwanted pregnacy resulting from a rape and it is the law of the land that makes it legal so-be-it!! but I think that RAPE should ALSO bring the death penalty for the rapist as well….
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:56pm“but I think that RAPE should ALSO bring the death penalty for the rapist as well….”
Unconstitutional. See Coker v. Georgia, 1977.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:25amLocked – And we can thank you bleeding heart liberals on that Supreme Court for outlawing the death penalty for these sick rapists.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 3:23amGIT-R-DONE — so much for being pro-life…
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 6:51amBruce P
Maybe he should clarify
He’s Pro Innoocent Life
Pro Life for Children
Pro Death Penalty for Rapists
do that clear it up for You?
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 8:30amITT, we learn that Git hates the 8th amendment.
I’m not surprised; he is a troll.
Report Post »Bruce P.
Posted on August 20, 2012 at 12:25pmThen he cannot claim to be pro-life. Funny someone claiming to be pro-life attacks someone for being “liberal” for not supporting the death penalty for a particular crime.
Report Post »tired_of_it2011
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:49pmThe worse thing that could ever happen to the pro-life movement is an amendment protecting abortion in the case of rape or incest. If you are pro-life, then you understand that abortion is murder. If you are religious, then you recognize murder as grave sin. If a woman is considering murdering her unborn child in the womb, why would lying about how she got pregnant make a difference to her. Lying is not on the same level as murder sin-wise.
Report Post »PeachyinGA
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:48pm“I mis-spoke” only works is you are a liberal. If you are a conservative it translates to “I’m sorry, I’ll resign if you want me to…..”
Report Post »princessnutsack
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:55pmYou want him to resign over this? Youre completely illogical and ridiculous.
Report Post »Toltepeceno
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 9:10pmprincessnutsack I believe the poster was being sarcastic.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:44pmWell aleast he corrected himself , hell I do it 2. who doesn’t ?
Report Post »Want our country back
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:41pmobama always LIES, I mean mis-speaks and all is forgiven, I wonder if the media will be as kind to Todd.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on August 19, 2012 at 8:55pmGOP can’t make mistakes. Lib’s r ready 2 jump @ a scratch & if 1 is 2 apolgise they will not forgive .
Report Post »