Politics

‘Kick Him in the Jimmy’: GOP Congressional Candidate’s Eye-Popping Reaction to Santorum

Martha McSally Says She wants to Kick Rick Santorum in the Jimmy

Martha McSally

Retired Air Force Col. Martha McSally is a war hero of sorts. She is the first American woman to fly in combat. She’s tough. And now she’s running for retired Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’s Congressional seat. But how tough is McSally? Well, on “Fox & Friends” Friday morning, she said she wanted to kick Rick Santorum in the crotch.

That’s not hyperbole. That’s really what McSally — a Republican — admitted.

Because her position as a female military member, Fox’s Steve Doocey played audio of Santorum talking about woman in combat and the “emotions” associated with that. (Click here to see what Santorum really meant by those remarks.) When asked for a reaction, McSally didn’t hold back.

“You know I agree with many of the things that Rick Santorum says, but when I heard this I really just wanted to go kick him in the jimmy.”

“Kick him in the jimmy?” Doocy asked.

“Yeah, he’s totally out of touch. I mean, completely out of touch. These are the types of arguments we heard 20-25 years ago as to why women couldn’t be fighter pilots.”

Doocy went on to ask if McSally would support Santorum if he became the GOP presidential nominee. She said she’d like to have a meeting with him to discuss some things.

“I don’t think I would mention the jimmy part to him,” Doocy said.

McSally’s response: dead silence and a smile.

“Yeah, I guess not,” Doocy said.

Here’s how it happened:

 

By the way, an interesting discussion has broken out amongst the editorial team here at The Blaze: is “jimmy” capitalized? Urban dictionary uses both the capitalized and non-capitalized word (although seems to settle on the latter). And according to dictionary.com, “jimmy” means “a short crowbar.” I guess it’s not hard to imagine how the phrase “getting kicked in the jimmy” came to be, then.

For the record, as you can see, we’ve settled on the lower case version.

Comments (192)

1 2 3 ... 5
  • John 3:16
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:04am

    Big talk from another Rino. Hey lady want a try at kicking me in the Jimmy, I’ll show you real combat, it’s called hand to hand combat.

    Report Post » John 3:16  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:16am

      What she is really saying is she wants to emasculate Rick Santorum. She’s no doubt a real ball buster with the other men in her life…or now the lack thereof. I this **** married?

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • oldguy49
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:18am

      have a womens brigade and incorporate gays into it and see what they can do…………p.s. no pregnant service people

      Report Post »  
    • Cleared Hot
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:19am

      There was an A-10 pilot who married her…and then divorced shortly thereafter.

      Poor bastard became the laughing stock of the community – he tries to deny is moment of stupidity to this day.

      Report Post » Cleared Hot  
    • Harry Assenback
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:19am

      Sure would love to her kick Wasserman-Schultz or Maddow in the Jimmy.

      Report Post » Harry Assenback  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:22am

      Martha McSally, an Irish woman she is. Any relation to John McCain? God I hope not, for it would be one strike against her already.

      Report Post »  
    • SpankDaMonkey
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:27am

      .
      Can you imagine the uproar if Rick said “I’d like to kick her in the Kitty!”……

      Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • slr4528
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:27am

      and little Rickie is not a RINO?? The only thing conservative about little Rickie is his desire to keep women barefoot and pregnant.

      Report Post »  
    • NHwinter
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:30am

      I miss the days when women were women and men were men. Too many women today act more like men. If they want to go into combat, let them. Just make it clear to all the men that they are to do no heroic actions for the women. Treat them like men.

      Report Post » NHwinter  
    • horsehockey
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:36am

      Right on, couldn’t have stated it better if I had tried.

      Report Post »  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:36am

      With that outburst she proved Santorum’s statement about emotions true. Saw that interview this morning on Fox and got a good laugh then.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:41am

      Women in combat is so dumb. We have to lower standards to allow them to fight. If they want to be on the front lines, then do what a man does in all strength and agility performances.

      Thw Military is not supposed to be a social program. BTW if you want to be gay and serve, I could care less…until you flaunt it openly with a lisp or a gay walk. Then you deserve the a@@ kicking you get. The military is to be used for killling the enemy quickly.

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • str8blues
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:53am

      Yeah……I think women can do just as good a job or better than men flying jets and a whole list of things…..but Rick Santorum was talking about women on the front lines in combat on the ground. And I don’t care how tough this lady is…….. if it gets down to hand to hand combat, she is most likely to loose. I think in a combat situation, a man is naturally programmed to turn on the defense mechanism and have a tendency to get as vicious as needed to win the battle. I don’t think women are programmed that way. Then factor in the 60-100lbs a fit 6,2″ soldier against what a 145lb woman……give me a break. But these types of feminists just want to make people believe that they are equal in every way. Every way perhaps but the genetic physical disposition male vs female.
      I thank her for her continued service to our country. I just think she needs to keep things in perspective. Rick Santorum is right.

      Report Post »  
    • Cleared Hot
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:55am

      @ Baddoggy -

      I’m sure you are blatantly aware, but turning the military into a social program is EXACTLY what all this is about.

      I’ve served with women, homosexuals, and people of nearly every race, creed, and religion. I don’t give a crap what you are so long as you are of good character and do your job.

      The repeal of ‘Don’t ask, don‘t tell’ was a maneuver to INJECT discourse and ‘social justice’ on members of the military. Nobody who served, including homosexuals I knew who were serving BEFORE the repeal, gave a crap about the issue.

      The more they can divide the military, the more control they can assert over it. Martha McChing is a perfect example of ‘I am woman – hear me roar’, and I know quite a few other female A-10 pilots who absolutely cannot stand her. These female A-10 pilots work hard to prove themselves in WHAT they do, not WHO they are.

      Report Post » Cleared Hot  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:22am

      I can’t imagine a real man saying he wants to be like a woman, and shun his God-given responsibility to protect his family and, if need be, his country. I don’t freaking care what secular women, feminists or liberals say. GOD didn’t create women to abandon the home, leave their children without a mother, and run to a godforsaken hellhole to fight a war. Women are physically weaker; their hormones change every month; they can get pregnant and carry an innocent life in their bodies.

      Ironically, these same women are fully aware that they are NOT men when birth control is in play. They scr*w the Constitution and God over their so-called WOMEN’s rights: Birth control is about a WOMAN’s body. WOMEN alone get pregnant. WOMEN alone decide whether they want to kill their baby or not. WOMEN have other female needs that may require birth control pills- MAN! the in-your-face list is endless! But when it comes to war… well… I guess they suddenly grow a jimmy. Oh, the wonders of evolution.

      Report Post »  
    • lynskinners
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:38am

      I love these women who believe in “total” equality with men. Let her pick 9 women – any women from anywhere – it really won’t matter, and have a little hand-to-hand combat with 10 men and leave the last man standing as the winner. I say last man because that’s exactly who will be standing – a MAN. Then give them weapons and try the same. You’ll get the same results. Then play a game of tackle football, or basketball, or soccer, or boxing, or UFC, or any “physical” sport – same results. Not being sexist here, just making the point that there are limits to equality between women and men and physical is the most obvious. Sorry, but when it comes down to it, I want a man in the fox-hole next to me on the front lines or a man dragging me out of a burning building (I’m 215lbs).

      Report Post » lynskinners  
    • marhee9
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 12:02pm

      Right on John. Probably not the best strategy for her to go after the nominee leading the race. I wonder if she even realizes what she’s just done to her chances of winning.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMbxtBIQX-I

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 12:50pm

      Not cool, Blaze. In reply to STR8BLUES, I quote from a scientific study (by a woman) proving that men are, in fact, better than women at flying fighter jets, and you censor my comment?

      Is science getting in the way? Then let’s shun science, and embrace the liberal myths. Let’s keep Betsy and her female Blaze moderators happy, guys.

      Here’s the censored link, if you want to check it out for yourself:
      http://www.dhushara.com/book/socio/kimura/kimura.htm

      Report Post »  
    • AlansTigg
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 1:09pm

      I just love the women who are offended by his remarks…he didn‘t say they’d go running screaming like little girls…he said it changes the dynamic….I’m sorry, don’t know a man worth his salt who is not naturally protective towards women, which as Santorum stated can easily result in a soldier (both men and women) making an emotional decision that is in direct opposition to what is best for the mission. People need to get a clue and just accept the face that men and women ARE actually different

      Report Post » AlansTigg  
    • TSUNAMI-22
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 3:29pm

      I think there’s something inherently funny about the Air Force training a female to fly an airplane like the A-10.

      After seeing the way some females drive, I guess it kinda makes sense to assign a plane that is very tough to destroy.

      I wonder if the Air force gives the female A-10 pilots some scented soap beads to accent the titanium bathtub that they fly in.

      ~sexism of content intended ~ ;)

      Report Post »  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 3:37pm

      STR8-
      I don’t think you have watched too many woman fighting. The get ruthless and violent real quick, at least against each other. Fighting spirit is not the issue, but mainly the upper body strength.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • scruffycat
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 3:50pm

      Yarr harr harr, all the fragile little male egos on this board. She could kick any of your asses and send you home crying to mommy. So freaking what? Would that harm your fragile little egos knowing that you’re not the most powerful? Oh My God what would you males do with yourselves when you can‘t say you’re powerful enough to beat down a woman? Ain’t nobody gonna put a burka on that american woman. semper fi.

      Report Post » scruffycat  
    • maineiac2422
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 4:49pm

      I served with Colonel McSally. She is more of a warrior than most of the men I served with. “Kick him in the jimmy” is the same sort of expression we all used. I’d follow her anywhere. Those who speak out of ignorance without knowing this woman need to get in line and prepare to have your collective jimmies kicked repeatedly. Warriors trust their own. Colonel West and Colonel McSally would have a lot to talk about…

      Report Post »  
    • RonmeyPaulBotsrOdd
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 5:30pm

      @mainiac2422 – get a grip! I don’t know about AF pukes – but you try not to kill under friendly fire. It was a poor choice for her to pop-off with just to gain some notoriety. Tact would be a good word of the day for her – further, it is his view and a far more respectable response to illustrate why she feels ALL branches should fall under a proposed new policy.
      You may be able to use references like that as an officer, but I know any NCO would be hammered for making a sexually offensive remark. “No one no more professional than I” certainly does not apply to this excuse for a Republican candidate. Policy versus personal attacks…she has a lot to learn and apparently you do as well.

      20 Years to the day and not another! (but proud to have made it)

      Report Post »  
    • RonmeyPaulBotsrOdd
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 5:33pm

      (further – I challenge her to kick me anywhere! I suppose I could just end with just as offensive talk.)

      Why doesn’t she just shut her sloppy slitch! Someone tell that gash to get with the program and be a team member.

      See – it works both ways. Show me how jimmies, slitches or gashes should be involved in the discussion.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 5:45pm

      @hidden_lion
      STR8- I don’t think you have watched too many woman fighting. The get ruthless and violent real quick, at least against each other. Fighting spirit is not the issue,
      ——–
      Heck no, it ain’t! It’s testosterone.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 6:02pm

      @scruffycat
      Yarr harr harr, all the fragile little male egos on this board. She could kick any of your asses and send you home crying to mommy.
      —–
      Hmm, meow. Methinks her ex-man went and curled up in mommy’s bed, because he was just like you.

      Report Post »  
    • Robert Williams
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 7:50pm

      Oh, man – you must be a bad dude, threatening to whip up on a woman! Don’t look now, moron, but the finance company is hauling your double-wide away.

      Report Post » Robert Williams  
    • aragona
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:19pm

      Agree, as a RINO she’s simply a democrat in disguise.

      Report Post »  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 8:52pm

      Here’s the basic issue (in the minds of Men) regarding Women serving on the front lines in combat. Men have a natural instinct to protect Women. This has been going on since the time of Cavemen (and Cavewomen). Men have a basic tenet to be fearful of military Women being captured and gang raped by the enemy. This happened to 2 Women captured in Desert Storm if you remember.

      Men and Women have bodies that are built differently (Duh). Men are basically stronger but, Women throughout History have been known to outperform Men and basically kick their but. One of the best aerobatic pilots today is a Woman and many Martial Arts Women can kick any normal Joe’s butt way down the preverbal street.

      Men just want to protect and love their Women and see no harm done to them. It’s not a racist issue or a (stupid) LGBT, etc, issue. Every normal Man is wired to protect his Woman. Changing that is like changing the DNA of Humans. It’s not going to happen. Even GI Jane, Demi Moore, was raped during the training part of that movie. Most Men are wired to prevent that from ever happening. Those who are not wired that way are sick…..

      Report Post » The-Monk  
    • PeachyinGA
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:45pm

      @3:16 exactly my thought. Another RINO.

      Report Post » PeachyinGA  
    • Patrick Henry
      Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:27am

      http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/we-know-what-you-know-and-we-are-all-watching-to-all-that-are-con

      Report Post » Patrick Henry  
  • shogun459
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:59am

    All jokes aside the main problem with women on the field of combat is NOT their emotions, strength to carry a soldier or to simply not run.
    Men do stupid things for women that they wouldn’t even concider doing for a man.
    We are hardwired that way.
    I don’t mean showing off.
    Look into the Israeli army they tried it.
    Repeatedly soldiers would run into certian death trying to get to a wounded female, “Gotta save her!” Where they would have left a Male. “Sucks to be you.”
    It is a common enough tactic, wound a man, make him scream, kill the every medic that comes.

    shogun459  
    • shogun459
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:05am

      And I have it on good authority that if you use a child the results are even better.

      Like using live mice to fish Bigmouth Bass.

      Report Post » shogun459  
    • WashingtonIsMyHero
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:09am

      That’s my take on this also – men will behave differently in a crisis situation if a women is involved than if it were all males. It’s instinctive.

      Report Post » WashingtonIsMyHero  
    • candcantiques
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:21am

      You are absolutely correct…
      Men do stupid things for women that they wouldn’t even concider doing for a man.
      We are hardwired that way. Repeatedly soldiers would run into certian death trying to get to a wounded female, “Gotta save her!” Where they would have left a Male.

      If this woman isn‘t intelligent enough to understand these FACTS and that he presence on the battlefield can actually cost MORE lives then I submit that she isn’t intelligent enough to hold office and represent Americans in Congress. Furthermore her call to violence on a mans reproductive organs, a man that understands the things written above, is a true sign of IDIOCY and I would be glad to fight AGAINST her representing American citizens untill she raises her IQ by a good 80 points. There are to many idiots in congress now.

      Report Post »  
    • gsplgtr
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:26am

      My son reffered to that as the “big Brother syndrome”. The woman gets wounded or captured and the men will try to save her. If a male soldier and feamle soldier are captured they will torture the female to get the man to talk. He has done five combat tours since January of 2003.

      Report Post »  
    • bpodlesnik
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:38am

      I think Santorums comment was more directed at men then women. For cryin’ out loud people, listen to what he actually says instead of taking a couple words, mixing them together, and blowing it way out of proportion.

      Report Post » bpodlesnik  
  • tricia
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:59am

    What an over-reaction, and childish thing to say or feel. She may be tough in the schoolyard with the boys, but she needs to grow up before she can be anyone’s representative in congress

    Report Post »  
  • DoctorRon
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:59am

    My guess is that Eric Holder will want her investigated for advocating violence.

    Report Post » DoctorRon  
  • JP16
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:57am

    Just the disconnect between what those like Santorum see as proper for women and what some women choose to do with their lives. Santorum does not see women as warriors. He only sees their vulnerabilities. Now, a male soldier can have horrible acts committed on them if captured, they can be sexually violated, they can be sexually mutilated. A female can have acts committed upon them as well. So why be against women in the battlefield? Because he sees them as needing protection. But, this is what they signed up for. In a battlefield, they are going to want their fellow soldiers to treat them like any other soldier and their fellow soldiers will understand this. Santorum is just unable to give them that respect.

    Report Post »  
    • USAF2003
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:08am

      Women have no place in military, police, construction. Plain and simple. Men and women are NOT the same, that’s just they way God made us. So quit wining and know your rule!

      Report Post »  
    • SquidVetOhio
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:08am

      Women are not warriors. Should not be warriors. War is the providence of men. I served with women. I used to have to do my job and theirs too. Some of them worked and tried hard but physically was unable to perform the task. So, after I carried my 65lb hydraulic servicing unit on top of my aircraft, I would get the luxury of carrying theirs up and down their aircraft. 4 out 10 of woman on the carrier would get pregnant during a 6 month cruise. Plus, men naturally have the instinct to protect women (rightly so) which could compromise the whole unit. This woman was a pilot. She never seen the people she killed. If you’ve never served along side them, you DON‘T know what you’re talking about! Woman have a role in the military but NOT IN COMBAT!

      Report Post » SquidVetOhio  
    • Mahtoska
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:12am

      Why is there always a push to have women abandon the very things that make them women? Don’t get me wrong, most ladies (like most men) can be tough as nails when need be, but when a woman consistently acts like a male, she sets aside the things that make her feminine; often the very things that bring out the best in men. Can women fight? Of course they can! Do they have to fight? When absolutely necessary! But this woman‘s response to Santorum show’s she’s no longer a lady but wants to be treated like a man… well, so be it. The gloves should come off and see how she handles herself in the arena… But she should remember, she‘s no longer in a cockpit but in the arena of ideas and now that she’s not wearing a helmet and flying a 40 million dollar jet we can see her face and when she spouts off it will have serious consequences that‘s she’ll have to be prepared to accept. Maybe she‘ll do okay but I suspect that she’s more like to offend than inspire. And that’s my analysis..PS: Note that I didn’t say she was right or wrong just that the way she handled this is going to have consequences. Have a greeeaaaat day ; )

      Report Post »  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:16am

      Don’t believe he does not see woman as warriors. Don’t believe it at all. Can women be jet jockies? Looks like it, doesn’t it. Are they physically and structurally as strong? Absolutely not! Front line combat is not the place for women!

      They are not given the same physical tests nor physical requirements – a pure case of political correctness. That will get others around them killed. Not smart at all!

      Report Post »  
    • zpritchard
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:29am

      JP16, His opinion on women in combat has nothing to do with seeing women as vulnerable. It has to do with the way men act around women. No relationship (either romantic or just being friends) can compromise the mission or the unit. Doesn’t matter if a woman is involved or not. Neither can be compromised and bringing women into the combat role brings more chance of that happening.

      Report Post »  
    • Dismayed Veteran
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 12:33pm

      @USAF

      You are off base about women in the military. My mother was a US Army nurse in WWII and received the Purple Heart for wounds she suffered while in North Africa.

      Report Post » Dismayed Veteran  
    • AxelPhantom
      Posted on February 18, 2012 at 12:23am

      Women are physically weaker than men. Their muscle fibers are by design, less numerous than men’s. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2759948 This means that given equal training regimes, without steroidal alteration, women are incapable of attaining strength equal/superior to a man’s.

      This is however where the blanket statements need to stop. Woman and men are different, however there are exceptions to every statement. Have you ever met a guy that you just thought dude you think like a woman? There are also women who think like a male. It is not to say that they are unfeminine in any other respect. There are woman who are logical, have outstanding spacial relationship abilities, and possess both the superior visual awareness of a male and the superior hearing and smell sensibilities of woman. Then there is the phenomenon known as woman’s intuition ;)
      Women who have experienced trauma in their lives, such as rape, molestation, domestic violence and/or witnessed unnatural death will either be forever weakened or rise to be emotionally stronger than an average male. This is statistically significant in that females are more than 5x more likely to experience the above than men in non-combat situations. Long and short, woman are more likely to present at a doctor with PTSD, but also respond better to treatment.

      Not enough space to give a whole synopsis so here’s the link

      http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/pages/women-trauma-ptsd.asp

      Report Post »  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:56am

    This woman is bitter, vulgar and lacks self-control – she wasted a golden opportunity to intelligently and politely disagree with Santorum on an important issue.

    Report Post » Tri-ox  
  • Athinkerinaseaoflibs
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:56am

    I love her honesty. I will keep watching

    Report Post »  
    • Cleared Hot
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:04am

      I love it, too. It shows what a complete nincompoop she is; I’d rather have all idiots out there say what they mean, and mean what they say, instead of being chameleons.

      At least we know where McChing stands…and it isn’t anywhere other than her own self-interests.

      Report Post » Cleared Hot  
  • Quixotic-911
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:55am

    More soldiers were removed from combat during the Vietnam war for foot rot than anything else. If they where women they would have died from toxic shock associated with yeast infections.

    Report Post »  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:21am

      Don’t worry, Obama has reduced our nuclear warheads from 5,000 to 1,500 and is now trying for 300. He’s reducing our ground forces and Navy and encouraging openly gay men and women of all stripes to fight on the front lines. What could go wrong? Can you imagine what Patton or Eisenhower would think of all this?

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • hi
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:36am

      Gonzo
      That glitter they throw is dangerous.

      Report Post » hi  
  • AmazingGrace8
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:53am

    Interpretation: She will not “kick down his door” or “knock on his door”…she is going to “jimmy his lock” If she does not win the seat, she could be the lead-person of-a-female-roller-derby-team or go into business as a locksmith. Seriously, I thank her for her service to our country.

    Report Post »  
  • woodrowsux
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:53am

    Santorum is a poor salesman for the conservative cause. He’s more Barry Goldwater than Ronald Reagan and will bring us defeat against the marxist in November. He reminds me of the Terry Schaivo case when he rails social consevatism and is 1950′s goody 2 shoes political style. This is probably why Sarah Palin and others are slow to warm to him. These times call for a defense of conservatism, right wing ideology and Tea Party grass roots fiscal conservatism by going on OFFENSE against …. Marxism, Muslim radicalism, anti- Israelism, anti capitalism and anti liberty and freedom – all tenets of the left, the media and Barack Inssein Obama and his wife as well as his pastor, his associates and friends and his own family. Put them on trial UNAFRAID and you win!! Right now the only one with the balls to do this is Gingrich. If someone else can do so STEP UP we know Newt has his warts, but that’s the winning strategy and goodt 2 shoes Santorum will not employ these winning tactics and the more people get to know Rick he is George W. Bush part deux. Socially Conservative , fiscally NOT and a timid activist (vocally) against the marxism, and treason of the current president.

    Report Post »  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:57am

      Newt is a mean person, no one will vote for that kind of guy. He is an admitted progressive and power hungry. He supports NDAA and Patriot act= he is a no go. Santorum is creepy and and also fails in the government intrusion department.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • SquidVetOhio
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:12am

      HIDDEN_LION

      I WANT a mean person. I don’t want or need some other candya$$ GOPer like Romney. So sick of the pansies in this country wanting a celebrity for president. This is not American Idol. I want someone who’s gonna kick some a$$ even if it’s in our own party!

      Report Post » SquidVetOhio  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 3:45pm

      Squid-
      There is a difference between feisty, and mean spirited. Newt has no remorse and will do more harm than good, not that he would get the chance. There has never been a bigger example of a hypocrite than newt. Romney is a pansy and I know what you mean about being tired of that kind of president. The GOP has seriously failed the country by not preparing for this election. They had an opportunity to find a good solid candidate, but they chose to push the same garbage they did in the last election. The country is going to pay dearly for it.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • LongRange
      Posted on February 18, 2012 at 7:59pm

      woodrowsux, Gingrich Is Ted Kenedy with a Republican mask… No one (or at least far from a majority) will ever foret or forgive his serial adultry. To slam Santorum as not being an electable conservative and in the same post say Newt is borders on Bi-Polar…

      Report Post » LongRange  
  • felix
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:51am

    make that a liberal,progressive man-lady !

    Report Post »  
  • sonnetswan
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:51am

    Can you believe this when Glenn and his cohorts extoll Santorum’s BS all the time. It seems they is inner workings in Glenn’s organization that we the sheeple are not privy to.

    I wish you all would wake up, investigate the candidates yourself and rely on your own judgement.

    The republic is in dire shape folks. We need a Ron Paul even if he can only turn the lethal suicide injection OFF for his term in office. Freedom lovers, DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK. USE YOUR LOGIC, JUDGE BY THE FRUITS.

    Report Post » sonnetswan  
  • ares338
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:51am

    Classy broad……now come kick me! Flying a jet does not a genius make.

    Report Post » ares338  
    • Cleared Hot
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:55am

      They told us in pilot training, “If we fed a monkey enough bananas, we could teach them how to fly.”

      She’s living proof of that statement. She was ‘fast-tracked’ from day one, even though a male with similar performance (or lack thereof) in an A-10 squadron would have never made it to the positions of leadership she did…especially with her lawsuit against the DoD.

      Another example of the double standards being upheld in America.

      Report Post » Cleared Hot  
  • felix
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:51am

    what else would be expected from a man-lady

    Report Post »  
  • AB5r
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:48am

    And if he said that he would kick her ass everyone would get all upset over a man intimidating a poor innocent woman. Women are weaker than men, either due to God creating them that way, or evolution if you believe that, and it matters, in life and in combat. Our Navy ships have become floating birthing clinics where female “sailors” get pregnant then get let out on paid leave to raise their chimp on the public dole. Yeah, that makes sense.

    Report Post » AB5r  
  • shogun459
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:47am

    Irregular usage, slang noun, small case in quotations
    “jimmy”

    Report Post » shogun459  
  • Cleared Hot
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:46am

    McChing is a complete JOKE in the A-10 community.

    It figures this woman who ‘blazed a trail’ would turn to politics – and sound like the complete buffoon she is on national t.v.

    She is exactly the type of person we DON’T need in politics today.

    Report Post » Cleared Hot  
  • DEConservative
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:45am

    Proof that Republicans from Arizona are stupid too….Oh yea…McCain…so we already knew that…*rolls eyes* next

    Report Post »  
  • JP4JOY
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:44am

    As long as the Blaze is doing linguistic trivia:

    There is also a “Johnson” which is reference to a wheeled long lever with a short lifting platform.

    Report Post » JP4JOY  
  • 13th Imam
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:43am

    The question is can every combat woman carry her fellow soldier off the field if someting happens?? Them and their Jimmy’s?

    Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • shogun459
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:49am

      They have been draging us around by the ‘jimmy’ since the dawn of time!

      hehehe

      Report Post » shogun459  
    • momrules
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:50am

      Careful there 13th, you are making too much sense, something pseudo-men don’t appreciate.

      Report Post »  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:52am

      There are a lot of pansy men that can’t do it either, but if woman are allowed in combat roles the physical standards, including upper body strength requirements, need to be made the same. Right now woman’s PT testing has lesser requirements than the mens. Also, they need to be required to sign for the draft like the men. Equal is equal.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • Rajabear1
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:17am

      I’ll probably be shot for this, but here it goes. I am a woman and I enjoy being a woman.Very independent-I‘ve raised 3 kids on my own for the better part of 14 yrs and haven’t dated in 13yrs. I decided not to drag men in and out of my kids lives for ‘my own happiness’ (never understood that crap anyway) until my youngest son graduates high school. I am of the firm belief that men and women were crated differently for a darn good reason. Women have strengths and excel in ways men can’t and vice verse.
      I thank her for her service, but it is women like her that are dragging down our military and our TRUE feminism. Although she may not realize it, ‘ladies’ like her are the reason our military men now have to wear fake bellies and breasts so they they can relate to fellow pregnant female soldiers (story in stars and stripes). I do believe there is a place for women in the military, but not at the expense of weakening our male soldiers mentally or on the front lines.
      It is not equality for her to let crap like that come out of her mouth when a male would be fired for saying the same thing about her. I’m in AZ but not in her district, but I can assure you I will be taking to folks that are.

      Report Post »  
    • Rajabear1
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:39am

      Oops, that was ‘created’ and ‘fried’ not ‘crated’ and ‘fired’.

      Report Post »  
  • MYHEROISRON
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:42am

    The Dude abides … did she mean ‘Johnson?’

    Report Post » MYHEROISRON  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:41am

    What dribble!

    Report Post »  
  • The Jewish Avenger
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:38am

    Phew… I thought they were going to say “Rainbow Sprinkles” and boy wouldn’t the LGBTQ be mad then!

    Report Post » The Jewish Avenger  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:38am

    Gosh, another hit piece on Santorum from the Blaze. Who could have seen that coming?

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • USPATRIOT101
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:49am

      No kidding, Romney supporters are circling the wagons.

      Report Post » USPATRIOT101  
    • flipper1073
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 10:28am

      Michigan is coming up
      gotta take him down before then.

      Report Post » flipper1073  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 11:38am

      At least FNC is just blatant about their support for Romney. All this supposed support for Santorum when he polled at about 7% followed by constant attacks when he is on top in the polls, is just a tad too much to transparent.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 6:54pm

      @Gonzo
      For the first time, my friend, you sound like a Paul sheeple — and that’s as bad as it gets. Beck has been for Santorum from the very beginning. He is friends with the guy and thinks Santorum is “a George Washington” (possibly the dumbest thing Beck has ever said). Beck’s buddies are not as enthused about Santorum, but they believe he‘s the best we’ve got. Those are not “hit pieces.” Au contraire, they are posted to expose moonbat lunacy and give us a chance to respond to it. Glenn also posts all the crazed comments the foaming commies and their media make about him.

      Report Post »  
  • Marcobob69
    Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:36am

    Sometimes I believe these candidates say so many things that they don’t realize what they are talking about after a while, so a “kick in the jimmy” might just wake him up!!

    Report Post »  
    • bikerr
      Posted on February 17, 2012 at 9:52am

      I thank her for sacrificing her time. All political and media will go after #1. In the media’s case they go after the most conservative .My question thought is why would a so-called Republican even partake in such behavior?.U.S.A. as we know it now needs Obama gone from the White House.I see spell check doesn’t even see Obama as correct! That’s hilarious!
      I know some names don’t qualify but try some others and they work fine.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 5

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love