‘Individuals vs. the Soros Machine’: Beck Explains ‘Global Freedom Movement’ to O’Reilly
- Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:00am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Mediate headlined their story with the phrase ‘Individuals vs. the George Soros machine.’ That seems about right:
Glenn Beck spent part of the week in Rome, talking to cardinals at the Vatican and uniting global Tea Party leaders.
On The Factor tonight, he told Bill O’Reilly he was up to building a global coalition, one he hoped to be of “individuals against the machine [George Soros] is trying to build.
After some banter on New York’s Cardinal Dolan (with O’Reilly joking that “I’m the biggest sinner in the world and you have to put up with me because I was baptized”), Beck got to describing the work of small government “Tea Party” groups across the world. “There were people from Georgia, Bosnia, Germany, London,” he noted, arguing that “the left is united around the world, and it is time for those who want freedom, faith, and justice for all.” He added that many places around the world lacked a small-government tradition.
Comments (67)
Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 696 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 518 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 353 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 343 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 341 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 341 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 343 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 261 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 341 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
suz
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:38pmmr. beck. why do you bother w/these vignettes w/o’reilly. if you’re going to do them crack down on him. he‘s soft even though he thinks he’s hard. you have the ability to change the dynamic, the mood of the interview, especially when you have the opportunity to reach a larger tv crowd.
you do know he makes fun of you; he makes light of you. what you have to say is way bigger than he and you miss the mark.
i know what you are doing is great good. these visits w/o’reilly do not reflect it.
Report Post »altops
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 9:57amagreed.
Report Post »georgepatton
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 5:55pmMARYBETHELIZABETH
Did your parents have any children that survived????????????????????
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:03pmIt would be great if Glenn could get the judge N. to join GBTV. He would be a great fill in for Glenn and also could have his own show on GBTV. Just a thought.
Report Post »cuinsong
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:48amThe devils own mouth piece and benefactor! He sings the devils song loud and clear!
Report Post »“The Devils Song” http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_10789987
cuinsong
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:51amI’m referring to George S. of corse
Report Post »edsginger
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:29amBill O leans whichever way the ratings wind blows… his biggest plumb is presidential interviews, he practically salivates over Owebama. Only time I watch is if the Beckster is on anymore.
Report Post »corcoran
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:44amWe need a logo…… ‘world tea party’
involve the people – have a contest- for the best logo.
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:22amTeapot? What can be clearer?
Report Post »TyrannyNoMore
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:02amI am surprised no one has given Spooky Dude “two in the hat” yet. Seriously, why is that old geezer still sharing the air we all breath. His whole life has been a plague upon the world.
As for O’Reilly, he bloviates too much……his word, not mine.
Report Post »acovenantinblood
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:28amYes that’s genius! Let’s all act just as uncivilized as those who destroy societies!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:01amWhy would Glenn waste his breath trying to explain anything to Elstupiod? O’Reily is a progressive, elitist fool at best. He does not understand anything. The man is a joke.
Report Post »Darla_K
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:11amAgree. :)
Report Post »Susie
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:44amI hate to say it because at one time O’Reilly was a crusader against the left, but I have to agree with BADDOGGY, O’Reilly has let his own fame swell his head so badly that he cannot see past his inflated ego. He’s become a Letterman tool.
Report Post »marybethelizabeth
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:55amDuring bad economic times fascism rears its ugly head
Smaller government means fewer government services. It means those services will be channeled to fewer people, so that government, of the people, is only serving an elite few.
This smaller government movement is the practical application of fascism
Report Post »TyrannyNoMore
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:18amYour right to post at the Blaze is hereby revoked for displaying abject stupidity on a regular basis.
Report Post »bccrane
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:35amI believe you’ve got that exactly backwards. Facism in Germany was a central goverment ever growing until it took over and nationalized business and any small business was compelled to pay more and withstand more regulations until they could no longer compete and everyone was eventually employed by the government. Right now we have a government that gives people paychecks who are unemployed and therefore made dependent on government, food stamps again another tool to produce dependents, welfare, subsidies, pensions, SS, healthcare, and on and on all to make people believe that the government has their best interests in mind. 1930′s Germany had “free” healthcare for all, “free” foodstamps for all, almost everything the current president wants, but the high cost of taxes came with it, but then Hitler being the head of the government decided that he should have the say as to who gets what since he is the one paying the bills then everyones freedoms evaporated to nothing, and you know how the government dealt with the undesirables it is all history now. This free contraceptives, free prenatal exams will be used against the people because it will become mandatory prenatal exams resulting in any undesireable fetus being aborted before birth to save the government money in the long run. Wait until they start using genetic tests to determine undesirability for isn’t it that a homosexual is a genetic anomally and maybe the government may not want to deal with them anymore.
Report Post »CLS
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:09amThere is a plethora of so-called government services that are serving no one but themselves. And there are equally as many that are simply a redundancy of the aforementioned. The smaller government movement (TEA PARTY) is the practical application of the Constitution of the USA. The polar opposite is the Obama agenda. So, Mary, you can sit around all day and spew your labels for the patriots among us… for the moment, we still enjoy the right to that freedom. But for how long .. Mary?
Report Post »marybethelizabeth
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:17amWho benefits?
In an industrial economy, business found it expedient for a pool of workers to be maintained at a subsistence level.
in our transition to an information economy (they will come to us for our knowledge, what a canard) the neo fascists assign this maintenance a lower priority.
Defanging the only institution that protects the people from the total takeover of America only benefits the elite.
If these were colonial times, Mr. Beck’s Keys would be the Loyalists.
Report Post »georgepatton
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 5:50pmMARYBETHELIZABETH
Did your parents have any children that survived?????????????????
Report Post »A1955Rosie
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:54amBravo Mr. Beck. Bill started out with a dopy intro. You heard it and humbly corrected it’s purpose.
Report Post »There is NO LEADER of the Tea Party & O digresses to insist that path.
THEN…I couldn’t believe my ears and it did pain me to hear him boast of being the biggest sinner and we have to put up with him…. Mmmm, that’s worse than “jazz”. Suffice to say Mr. Beck that while many including spinner may not understand…there is a plan and you are obedient. Godspeed.
Nemo13
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:41amIt’s a good idea to reach out to people in the world. It is correct, the left is united (with other evil) around the world. A partnership with bad nutjobs for the quest of ultimate power in a global new world order. Starting now is a good idea, as long as the USA mission is not lost in the mix. We must reach out to all like minds.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:50amI’m having a hard time believing GB is the best guy to be the champion of any freedom movement lately. I didn’t see him give the NDAA the attention it needed, although he did do the interview with Allen West. Which is way more than anyone else. My biggest concerns are what’s happening here on the Blaze. Lack of relevant stories that don’t fit his narrative, unflattering pictures used on hit pieces, etc. But, what really fuels my skepticism is what’s being censored in the comments section. I’ve had my share of issues in the past, but yesterday when I noticed that someone else’s post, regarding a veterans rally, was deleted I was appalled. Freedom does not consist of silencing opposing view points.
Report Post »Sandy
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:22amSeriously, other than typing your opinion here what have you done to expose the NDAA? What have you done to stop the agenda of the white house? What have you done to expose Soros and his minions? It appears that you simply want to be critical of what ‘is NOT being done’ verses all that ‘has been done’……..
Report Post »What part of “overwhelming the system” do you not understand? And it has worked with you since you are complaining verses ‘standing together’ with others which is what we NEED to do!!!!
justangry
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:43amI will gladly stand up for the TRUE champion of freedom with you. You should join us.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdqRfN9XQgM&feature=share
UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 9:22amSandy,
I too an a bit concerned about Beck’s self-proclamation of “Ambassador of Freedom”. Its not so much what I’ve done, but his non-inclusion – or outright ignoring – people who have done something that he allegedly believes in.
Not one word on any Beck outlet about Judge Napolitano. There has never been a mention of Peter Schiff either. Why is Beck not bouncing Ron Paul’s foreign policy off these folks while he is jet-setting around the Globe? Why not just bring back all these International Tea Party affiliate’s own foreign policy suggestions? While Beck disagrees with Ron Paul on only one alleged point, woudn’t it be prudent to get the input of potential international allies? Why not bounce all the candidates off these international entities and bring back the result reported with honest disclosure?
Who would argue that all the above mentioned people have not only acted on, but suffered for thier causes? Causes Beck feins to support, but never mentions any of the above?
The answer is demonstrated by his pseudo-endorsement of Santorum. He only agrees with Santorum on one issue – Theocracy. He would throw the 95% of true Tea Party positions under the bus for a chance at a Christian Theocracy. He does this not realizing the danger this would put his own faith in. The goal should be Constitutional freedom so that he-as a mormon, and I-as a Baptist have the freedom to worship as we choose apart from ANY government involvement.
Report Post »Tawny
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:09amUnreconstructedLibertarian,
Honestly, when Beck first proclaimed himself, “Ambassador of Freedom”, I cocked my head and palmed my face. Then again, he can call himself, “Lord Zed of the Moon”, for all I care. Deeds speak louder than words, infinitely so.
You make a few valid points though, and a few I can’t help but feel are erroneous.
1a. Why not talk with the other, international Tea Party movements about what they feel about our foreign policy? What are their feelings about our various candidates?
1b. This sounds logical, I can’t disagree; though I think its fallacy to assume he didn’t do as much in private. Can we honestly say that we’re following Beck around, 24/7 and know everything he is doing? I would assume your retort is along the line of, ‘but if he did why isn’t he talking about it?’, who knows? Maybe they asked him not to, maybe he doesn’t think its prudent, honestly I there could be a great many reason, all endless speculation.
2a. What about other people who stand, and suffer for the same beliefs that Beck does? Why doesn’t he ever give them credit?
2b. Politics. Not literal politics, but social politics. Being overly associated with people means you can be pegged for their individual comments or choices, ties your hands, and can force one to divert resources to defending them, even if you don’t agree. They may well be friends in private, but in public degrees of separation can protect both groups and individual. To some degree
Report Post »Tawny
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 10:21amUnreconstructedLibertarian
3a. Beck supports Santorum only because they both seek a Theocratic regime; Beck would sacrifice a significant portion of the Tea Party Movement to achieve this end.
3b. This is where you and I must come to blows I’m afraid. Santorum just happens to be the only real social conservative in the race, his record as a financial conservative is not flaws…lots of flaws. I believe, that Beck considers this a generational war, one that will take a great long struggle and many, many years. By that concept, and his own morality, he determines that Santorum being a social conservative, and (maybe?) a reformed financial conservative is the best option. I think Ron has his own issues, and my father and I will argue about that till we’re both blue in the face, but I challenge you to honestly find a point where Santorum calls for a theocratic regime, then post it here. If you can do such I will vote Paul 2012, you have my word as a gentleman.
Oh ya, the ‘toss the tea party under the buss’ thing. Pft, I don’t think he could do more damage than the media has, and no offense nothing Beck really does says, ‘WANT THEOCRACY!!1!’, he obviously considers religion extraordinarily important but I don‘t see ’That’.
Anyhoot, GOD bless ya.
Report Post »UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:22amWell Tawny, I’ve used some “key words” that have left me moderated – yet again. I didn’t save those posts to re-post – so I’ll cut to the chase and forego my point-by-point rebuttals.
I somehow doubt this response will make to the screen either, but here we go.
“Deeds speak louder than words, infinitely so” I completely agree.
My son in law is a Mormon, and we discuss religious matters on Sundays. One sunday he caught me catching up on my viewing of Glenn Beck and joined in. After the first hour of viewing, his only comment was “Wow”. My inquiry to the comment was answered by my son in law pointing out that the entire show was Mormon prophecy and effect. I replayed the episode and allowed him to comment specificly, right down to a Beck comment I remember clearly “But, we come out better on the other side” in reference to the Constitution. Beck’s network is entirely “Doctrinaire”, right down to the advertisers he chooses to use.
“But, we come out better on the other side” is remembered because of its significance. Mormon prophecy dictates that a “Constitutional Crisis” will occur that will almost destroy America. The Mormon faith comes to the rescue of the Constitution and thereby the Nation, which not only reconciles it with those who survive by “being prepared” – but also reconciles the denomination with the balance of denominations. A Constitutional Theocracy is thereby established without any lingering questions.
God Bless you
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 11:41am@Tawny, Are you ok with GB and/or the Blaze ignoring the Veterans for Ron Paul rally, even deleting posts highlighting the event?
Report Post »Tawny
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 12:07pm@UnreconstructedLibertarian
I can’t say I know anything about any of that; sounds interesting, without doubt, but I’m not a Mormon or a scholar on the Mormon doctrine, and you’ll have to understand my reluctance to reply to third-hand information without recourse. If you have any information that you can quote me or specifics to point me towards a direction I’ll be glad to look at it, by all means. If its the truth than anything less than accepting it would make a fool.
@justangry
Depends, if people are just spamming the comments then as a moderator I would probably remove them, ’cause its spam. If they’re making an intelligent point in reference to the story and topic I would assume a link as such would be fine.
GOD bless ya both~! ^.^
Report Post »UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:12pmTawny,
I appreciate your non-reliance on 3rd pary information, I also subscribe to that and did dedicate quite a bit of time to researching my own son-in-laws interpretations at the time.
Its called the “White Horse” prophecy.
http://www.latterdayconservative.com/faq/the-constitution-hanging-by-a-thread-and-the-white-horse-prophecy/
No better place to acquaint yourself with it than a self-proclaimed LDS conservative site.
Joseph Smith alledgedly related it in 1843. This prophecy is better understood in hindsight. If history is accurately applied to the prophecy, it could well be proven to have already occurred in the 19th Century.
Note the year, 1843. Joe Smith described their difficulties with Washington DC and the War Between the States. If you understand anything about southern history and opinion on the WTBS – this prophecy is astounding as it is accurate in every detail of southern perspective and actual occurrance.
But let me go on and explain why the LDS doesn’t see it that way, this prophecy (and/or its elements) was transformed into a modern theocratic narrative in the 20th Century. Ezra Benson took up this narrative as if it hadn’t occurred yet – and interjected the Lincoln (Republican) myth.
It is a fascinating study that I hope you indulge in, but it does cause one to be a bit more skeptic of Beck’s perspective and objective clarity. Hence my adjective “Doctrinaire” to describe the proof of his deeds.
Report Post »Tawny
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:08pmUnreconstructedLibertarian,
For clarity’s sake WTBS refers to the Watch Tower Society, correct?
Exceptionally interesting. Though to assume that Beck subscribes to such a concept may be incorrect, I can‘t say I know the man personally and certainly can’t speak for him. It does bring up a series of inevitable questions, ranging from, ‘was Joseph Smith a real prophet’, to, ‘is this just a fringe belief with the LDS church’.
I wouldn’t say it really colors my view of Beck though, if he does or doesn‘t believe it is irrelevant ’if’ we believe he really is trying to do right by GOD. If we accept that GOD is in control and we strive to do right by him, while nonetheless being discerning persons, it doesn’t matter; if we resist extremism in all its forms and move with temperance I think we’ll save this country, even if it takes generations. (And I’m saying that as an 18 year old…)
It may feel that Beck’s goal is a bit theocratic (or could be motivated by such concepts), but his words seem to say differently, and honestly none of his actions look like the move of a Theocrat. Nevertheless, it pays to keep an eye on him, and his actions. I worry that his pride may be showing with his remarks, or it may simply be his exhaustion and exacerbation. Time will tell.
GOD bless brother, and thank you for the information and thoughts.
Sincerely, Tawny~! =)
Report Post »UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:49pmTawny, If you are indeed 18 years old – my complements on your ability to write and discuss things clearly. That’s not a quality I see in your age group very often, not a quality I see very often anywhere for that matter.
WTBS – a typo on my part, however it used to be one of my favorite cable channels back when cable was young. I meant WBTS (War Between the States) – which you knew already.
It is a fascinating study, which I did not realize until I was made aware by the previously mentioned conversation. But I will caution you, the more you study it – the more the language used in Mormon writings on the subject becomes evident in Glenn’s dialogue. His view of history becomes that of the late 20th Century LDS leadership – without exception.
I am not a Mormon either. If I did not have the privelege of a Mormon point these things out – I would yet be oblivious to the connections. The more I studied, the more I realized those things that don‘t quite add up in Glenn’s logic and historical application – suddenly made sense when changing perspective. That change being viewed through the lens of his particular religious idealogy.
Likewise, the “social associations” he’s making – also begin to make much better sense.
Sincerely, Unreconstructed Libertarian
Report Post »Tawny
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:42pmUnreconstructedLibertarian,
You flatter me, I’m really not that good. Maybe one day, till then I strive for perfection. Writing is an art, and I’m really fairly novice at it.
I suppose I’m just confused by your general consideration that, whatever his ideological path may be, is inherently a negative, assuming its true. Honestly, nothing he’s done points to a theocratic bent in any real, tangible, sense. Even if he does somewhat…proselytize for his faith, I can’t see a negative to what it over all has done. Most of it really is just what my father drilled into my head when I was little, “proper preparation prevents poor performance”. Being prepared just seems wise, in general.
And as a person who has actually bothered to look at Lincoln; yes, he is a somewhat of a dirt-bag, freeing the slaves wasn’t his goal – the founders tried that far, far better, with elegant foresight – but I don’t think he was evil, just foolish and arrogant. By the same extension the south behaved just as foolishly at several points in the war. Frankly, both sides were incredibly cruel for no discernible reason. Truly sad when you realize the cost. The reconstruction was an utter nightmare that decimated so much, with so much spite, that you can’t wonder but what kind of human could inspire it.
“Social Associations”? Do you mean, the tea party and 9/12 project or something further afield?
GOD Bless~!
Sincerely, Tawny.
Report Post »UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 10:30amTawny,
My intent was not to flatter, but to encourage. I want to also encourage you to always seek the unmitigated facts and remain objective. You obviously have a good start at doing just that; cultivate it in the pursuit of truth.
I want to point out the potential harm being done by Glenn Beck’s “Doctrinaire” handling of facts. I also want to clarify that my comments aren’t solely criticising the LDS, but applies to any other denomination – even my own.
The premise of Glenn’s entire network is “The truth has no agenda”. However, Glenn may very well have an agenda – which is forwarding the LDS faith and doctrines as he sees them. This agenda leads him to to take stances that are not historicly factual upon review. Lincoln, Radical Republicans, and their actual Marxist associations are just one example. Glenn demonizes any criticism of Lincoln because it is against the nationalistic dogma of his faith – and does this in the face of a very full body of evidence contrary to his stance. This does two “harms”: 1.) it casts doubt upon other stances that may be completely true, and 2.) casts the same kinds of doubts upon his actual faith.
Mingling faith and politics is a sure road to disaster, modern Islamic extremism is a perfect example. While Christians would like to think themselves above that, history would prove otherwise. Also, its rediculous to assume a Theocracy would “get it right this time around” any better than Marxism has.
cont….
Report Post »UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 11:21amAs far as “social associations” are concerned, this was in reference to your first post:
“…Being overly associated with people means you can be pegged for their individual comments or choices, ties your hands, and can force one to divert resources to defending them, even if you don’t agree.”
I still agree with your statement here. Again, Glenn has “overly associated” with people he has cherry picked for his theological purpose – and that purpose alone. David Barton is the prime example. Barton’s entire agenda is theocratic establishment within the context of the Constitution. This is entirely indefensible and you won’t see Barton debating anyone on the subject, only proclaiming his point of view and materials he approves for the same purpose. Glenn latched onto Barton because they share the same viewpoint regarding the Constitutionality of Christian Theocracy.
The underlying agreement between them is that no Judeo/Christian denomination should be named as “National”, but that Chrisitanity should be sanctioned in general by government involvement. Neither realize how dangerous that is – as it creates corruption and power play. If Christianity “in general” is established, the fight will soon arise as to which denominiation is “more Christian”. Let an overtly Christian topic pop up here and examine how many posts attempt to justify a particular faith over the other.
Matt 22:21 is the best policy I know.
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:47amBill Reilly is either playing stupid or he’s suffering from a bad case of normalcy bias with complications caused by egocentrism.
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:49amClueless BILLO is a tool of the progressive movement. He is controlled opposition to give lip service to insignificant conservative agendas while softening the people up on the hard core agenda items such as freedom and our Bill of Rights. Don’t believe me?? Watch this video of BillO taking a big poop on our constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isd0FlGb_LY
and watch him defend his trashing of the Constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICoiFBWGX4M&feature=related
BillO is a piece of TRASH and should be known to all patriots and believers of freedom as an Enemy of the Constitution.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:41am@BEHINDBLUEEYES Bingo!
Report Post »ALL-IN
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:25amHey O’reilly===== Word of the day=== Don’t be a ==== FOOL===oops too late for you !!!!
Report Post »Darla_K
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 8:14amlol
Report Post »ZABO
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 5:53amyou know o’reilly always talks about “the folks” this idiot (and i watch 4 out of 5 days a week) really has no f-in clue. he talks a good game. what i hate the most is how he cuts everybody off. i think he’s scared to say what we say about obama. he’s only worried about his most watched rating. he’s affraid of scaring off independants or something. or he’s not as smart as he thinks. he is his own saying “pinhead not patriot” retire o’reilly cause you wont even call blowbama a socialist.
Report Post »blanco5
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:51amWhy are you supporting his show by watching it? I stopped watching when he had a love affair with prez islama. I turned to someone who was brilliant at defending the Constitution and fox fired him. Now I watch anything else BUT fox.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:12ami stoped watching mr O when i saw him suck up to michael moore. he stinks.
Report Post »poorrichard09
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:45amZabo: you are so right. O‘Rielly is for O’Reilly, period.
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 4:50amO’Reilly is a dolt!
Report Post »Trevorkian420
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:36amJust went to glennbeck‘s site and watched the interview I just have to say thank god beck finally did a segment without acting like ass clown it’s about time
Report Post »ldaopines
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:11amIn trying so hard to be “fair and balanced”, Bill stands for nothing really. He bends over backward to make things seem even, which they aren’t. The deck is stacked a hundred times against social and fiscal conservatives, and the opposition fights VERY VERY dirty (not “fair and balanced”). We need truth, whether it’s considered “fair and balanced” or not. It’s just truth.
Glenn is a deep thinker, and I think incredibly intelligent. Further, he’s a natural speaker, motivator, planner and organizer. Like a sniper, he sees where the left is headed and aims ahead with great accuracy. I can’t think of anyone else who can draw audiences with a chalkboard and history lesson the way he can. Rush has his own gifts on radio, but there is no one like Glenn. That includes O’Reilly and Jon Stewart.
Report Post »wakeuplds
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:45amtotally agree with you LDA..
Report Post »When Beck is absent it’s just not the same. Even if it’s the same monologue and information. He is GBTV and our voice to the world right now. This kind of scares me though because it means he is irreplaceable to our cause. We need to pray for Beck’s safety and then find and support others who are good speakers, understands things the same way he does, and makes it interesting. Be careful Beck, please no more reaching for pencils!
Pigeonlip
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:50amBill just doesn’t see it, he really seems to becoming more ‘unhinged’ lately. I thought he was a bit condescending towards Glenn tonight. Is his “fame and success” getting to his head? He’s a bit of a turn off lately with some of his rants…..I’m just “one of the folks though”, who am I to say……
Report Post »Trevorkian420
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:15amI stopped watching O‘reilly a long time ago he doesn’t see and doesn‘t want to see it and he always allows liberals to go unchallenged but cuts off any conservative that try’s to speak if you don‘t know what I’m talking about watch the combs and Crowley segments he does he let‘s combs ramble on and on and won’t even let Monica speak
Report Post »KevINtampa
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:45amBest Oreilly rant ever:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dy7cGGASAlVQ&v=y7cGGASAlVQ&gl=US
Oreailly lost it long ago if he ever had it all. He’s just a puppet doing what a good mainstream cable host should do, play the game.
Take any “side” you want, but but only so long as it perpetuates the presented progressive dialogue. If you can control the dialogue, you control the people.
Watching the news anymore feels like watching Rick Flair and Rowdy Rowdy Piper argue back stage.
Anyone who doesn’t understand that obvious reality,well, let’s just say I can hear them saying, “Four legs good, two legs bad” while they look astonished at the site of the pigs in house walking on two legs. And that goes to all proud Democrats and Republicans. You buy into that “debate” prsented by either side you might as well be watching the latest Vince McMahon extravaganza.
Report Post »smallybiggz
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 4:05amO’Reilly thinks he is the smartest man on the planet and will not listen to Beck because he doesn’t have a degree from a prestigious university. Beck runs circles around him and makes him look like a fool. One of these days he will have to confess he has been schooled by Glen. Lets watch and see if he has the character to man-up. I’m not holding my breath.
Report Post »smallybiggz
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 4:33amKevintampa, brother, you nailed it.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:37amIt would not surprise me one bit if O’Reilly was a Soros’ stooge
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:23amWell, he‘s Rupert’s stooge. I don‘t know that there’s much of a difference between Rupert and Georgie.
Report Post »LogiStyx
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:35amTry to explain anything to O’Reilly is futal. I think he’ losing it.
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:12amMe too.
Report Post »JLocke
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:18amSadly, I think he is losing it. Seeing him on Leno praising Obama proved it.
Report Post »smallybiggz
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 6:55amI heard O’Reilly on Leno saying that he thought Barack was a good man!!
Report Post »Gee, Bill, what is a bad man then? Connect the dot, dumba$$.
Rightallalong
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 7:50amBILLO is controlled opposition to give lip service to insignificant conservative agendas while softening the people up on the hard core agenda items such as freedom and our Bill of Rights. Don’t believe me?? Watch this video of BillO taking a big poop on our constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isd0FlGb_LY
and watch him defend his trashing of the Constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICoiFBWGX4M&feature=related
BillO is a piece of TRASH and should be known to all patriots and believers of freedom as an Enemy of the Constitution.
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:23amThis is a battle between good and evil. Good will prevail regardless of our numbers if we,the faithful stand together. Ignorance is the greatest weapon that evil has on their side. We need to spread truth and wisdom to all who will heed us.
Report Post »LeadNotFollow
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:18am…
Report Post »Don‘t care much for Bill O’Reilly.
More often than not, he leans too far left.
HereticWilson
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:15amHaha, no. If George Soros were really fighting Glenn seriously, I’m pretty sure Glenn would have passed away from “apparent suicide” or other accident. Let hope that monster never sees it as ‘Beck vs Soros’.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 2:06amWe must stand against the darkness or be consumed by it.
Report Post »PeppermintCrush
Posted on February 22, 2012 at 3:23amAmen my friend, Amen.
Report Post »