Irony: Anti-War Protester Screams Pro-Gitmo Woman Should be ‘Hanged’
- Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:28am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
We’ve already brought you one video from the weekend anti-war/Occupy Wall St. protest in Chicago. Now we have another gem.
Blogger Rebel Pundit again caught up with a protester in the middle of the march. This time, he interviewed a man who was quite upset that a counter-protester had a sign supporting the U.S. prison in Cuba, Guantanamo Bay.
“You should be hanged for treason right there!” the video shows the man yelling as he marches. He then points out a woman holding a sign that says “Gitmo Love.“ When pushed on if he actually thinks she should be ”hanged,” the man backs off a little, and says, “maybe not hanged, but she is a treason.” Still, he then goes on to explain that people who commit treason should be killed.
Rebel Pundit explains:
We caught up with this anti-war protester on Saturday. He was shouting “die and hang” to a woman holding sign supporting Gitmo. He was afraid we were with Fox News and we might only use snippets of the interview, so we decided it was best to let you hear most of his thoughts.
But wait, there’s more. Rebel Pundit noticed the man was carrying a socialist worker sign and asked if he supported socialism and communism. The man responded:
“Socialism means a democratic– before the Soviet Union, before that word got perverted and corrupted, socialism meant democracy over the work place, and I believe in the original definition of having democratic ownership over your work place, over the economy.”
He also defines patriotism as dissent.
You can watch it all below:
[Content Warning: contains graphic language]





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (150)
salvawhoray
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:10pmthat guy can keep one eye on the camera and one eye on the intervewer. lol
Report Post »ltb
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:28pmDoes anyone see the irony in the fact that pacifists are always the kind of people you want to smack across the face?
Report Post »en2deep
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:00pmThey all believe in the “death penalty”, just not for those who actually deserve it. They are perverted.
Report Post »Zer0
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:09pm@LTB,
I think the real irony is that “pacifists” are usually the first ones to say you should be killed if you disagree with their limited, myopic, political views.
Report Post »swalt
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:16pmThis shows they are not pacifists … they are truly dangerous people. As Glenn says, useful idiots. We will see, in the coming months, a huge ramp up of all this. October 15th is the global uprising, and by spring of next year the US will be … transformed.
http://www.securefutureinbadtimes.com
Report Post »notatoomah
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:04pmOctober 15th? Really? America will change in the spring of 2012? You have it all wrong. What’s going to happen, is these people will either be arrested, deported, or just get tired of it all and go home. I just hope somebody keep all these tapes for the future when these idiots try to run for office.
Report Post »BlackAce41
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:29pmwhy does this man look like Mr Bean?
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:42pmYou can tell from his comments his head is filled with things a dog would not eat and a cat would want to cover up. Some where in your past life some Union teacher must of filled your head cavity with buzzard vomit and/or HOG SNOT.
Report Post »Rogers1756
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:55pmThis gentleman is shockingly ignorant. His pasty, frail frame and bug eyes tell a tale of neglect, malnutrition and psilocybin abuse. He’s holding a sign made by a corporation in support of Socialism while protesting corporations and has the nerve to say “depends on your definition of Socialism?” Do I want to bludgeon this kids face in? Depends on your defintion of bludgeon….
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:58pmI’ve been listening to a lot of “occupy _______” videos (they are doing this in large cities all over the country) and the words they use disturb me. It seems they are co-opting the Tea Party.
They call themselves “patriots”
They often chant “We the people”
You’ve read reports where it said this “includes the Tea Party”
I decided it is Socialists hijacking the Tea Party.
Just like Fox News hijacked the Tea Party for the neo-con agenda
Fox News STOLE the Tea Party
Tea Party Split: Sarah Palin and Ron Paul discuss Israel/drugs/more
/watch?v=VEl5r1aHWP4
Chinese invade Texas: /watch?v=BHrkc6EB6h0
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 4:32pmThose full of hate will hide behind the banner of peace. That’s how evil works.
Report Post »Biscuit Feed Bubba
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 5:22pmI get the sense that he’s gay. ewh…
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 5:43pmWe gave him his say and now the Blazer can decide what his fate should be. No doubt we would not say he should be hung or the like, in fact he is entitled to his opinion and freedom of speech. Unfortunately he does not have his facts straight and his world view is so childish that he makes no sense whatsoever. Hang the lady but its OK for him to say what he wants to? There are so many others like him and worse, because they know exactly what they are doing and have nothing to replace the system with once they tear it down for this masters. But those incharge will replace it with a system that has been used many times and has failed many times, caused massive loss of life but yet here we are marching onward to the madness of silly people like this misguided young man.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 6:42pmSomething tells me that this kid never had to bail hay for ten yours a day.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 10:43pmhow many conservatives here have teenagers who think just as stupidly as this demonic mobster?
Report Post »If your teenagers are in public school- they do.
If you haven‘t pulled them out of public school you’re part of the problem.
Teenagers while being emotional are taught very subtly to use emotion as a moral compass. Parents are too busy to even know what they are combatting.
RepubliCorp
Posted on October 11, 2011 at 6:51amhttp://www.dailypaul.com/180689/ron-paul-supporters-at-wall-street-protest-mentioned-on-tv
Report Post »Guess who is there?
elosogrande
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:10pmThere is no substitute for intelligence. Guys like this will be failures for the rest of their lives, bacause they have nothing to offer in order to make a decent living
. This little puke never had an original thought in his life, and dollars to donuts, he never will.
Report Post »EddardStark
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:03pmIrony: A woman using her constitutional right of free speech to support the denial of constitutional rights to others.
Report Post »staunch conservative
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:12pmEddardStark
…..
People at Gitmo do not have constitutional rights. ONLY American’s are protected under the Constitution.
Report Post »EddardStark
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:31pmI thought you guys were into original intent. I guess I missed the part of the Bill of Rights that identified “Americans” or “Citizens” as the only people given rights under our Constitution. I should return my 1791 gear I guess since I missed the implied meaning of the Bill of Rights that basic human rights are only guaranteed to Americans.
Report Post »Lesterp
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:56pmWhat rights are they being denied eddy?
Report Post »Nanner-SW
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:23pm“the right to a speedy and public trial” where they can be found guilty of waging war on the United States and properly punished.
Report Post »BSdetector
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:27pmYou missed the part where a Constitution protects its own citizens and not hostile foreigners bent on destroying said citizenry? Maybe you should pick up a Dictionary…
Report Post »dakz
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:42pm@eddardstark
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
The phrase “People of the United States” has sometimes been understood to mean “citizens.” This approach reasons that, if the political community speaking for itself in the Preamble (“We the People”) includes only citizens, by negative implication it specifically excludes non-citizens in some fashion. It has also been construed to mean something like “all under the sovereign jurisdiction and authority of the United States.” The phrase has been construed as affirming that the national government created by the Constitution derives its sovereignty from the people, (whereas “United Colonies” had identified external monarchical sovereignty) as well as confirming that the government under the Constitution was intended to govern and protect “the people” directly, as one society, instead of governing only the states as political units.
Report Post »WhosGotYourBackNow
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 3:05pmNot even Americans have Constitutional Rights any more, remember Obama just dropped a bomb ( hell fire missiles ) on the American? That is not allowed and is forbidden by the Constitution
Report Post »EddardStark
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 3:17pmThanks for the quote. The preamble is great although you seem to be willing to admit a lot of shades of gray to that whole “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” bit. Not to mention you are making my point. It says “people” in the Preamble, not “citizens” or “non-Indian residents”. That would include “people” taken from all around the globe and brought under US jurisdiction for purposes of detention and torture. Just because you wish that the preamble said “citizens” or even “christian, native-born, citizens of European descent” doesn’t make it say that. You at least could of found the parts of the Constitution that had the word “citizen” in it. You would find that it is really only used to describe people eligible for national, elected office and has nothing to do with guaranteeing rights to citizens only.
How do you reconcile championing free speech with the imprisonment of “people” without charges or a trial?
Report Post »Lesterp
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 4:07pmSo Eddy, under your thinking, We the people is meant to include everyone on Earth! I did not know the founding fathers but, I would bet my life that was not what was intended!
Report Post »BSdetector
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 4:24pmOf course, how could we have been so blind? The founders wanted us to force our constitution on the whole planet!
Report Post »EddardStark
Posted on October 11, 2011 at 2:15pmHas the whole world been rendered off to Guantanamo Bay? I suppose it could be, in which case my definition could cover the entire globe, but really it only applies to the “people” of the United States and that would include the couple of hundred people that the United States took into custody without charges, trial or representation.
Report Post »Mohawk1773
Posted on October 11, 2011 at 5:13pmYo ED, it’s We The People, not People of The World… it’s “our” not “all”… just admit your wrong and STFU. It’s really not hard to figure out… what is wrong with these brain dead New World Order Citizen types… sometimes I wonder if they live in houses with walls or sleep out the in the wild.
Boundaries, do you understand boundaries, ED? If not, it may be time to see a shrink. Damn…
Peace.
Report Post »Forward
Posted on October 11, 2011 at 6:51pmeddardstark
I realize that responding to someone who is ignoring the fact that those held at Gitmo are not “people of the United States” (indeed they would be deeply offended if you suggested that, would reject such a label and try to kill you for suggesting it) but let’s try it.
To be a person “of the United States” I would presume that they would WANT to be a person of the United States and would be willing to follow its laws as promulgated under the Constitution. The fact that these individuals have come under the military’s control while under suspicion of fighting against our armed forces and are now held in a FOREIGN location is secondary to their desire to a person of anything other than the United States.
Let’s assume we ignore that and say that we would extend our protections to them, the location does matter. Gitmo is part of Cuba. We occupy it as a military base under a lease. Many Democrats tried to argue that McCain wasn‘t a citizen because he wasn’t born in America (he was born in the Canal Zone). Can’t have it both ways.
So let’s summarize, you want to extend the protections of the “people of the United States” to those who don’t want to be “of the United States” who are not actually IN the United States. I‘m sorry but it just doesn’t make any sense to me. That would seem to be a massive case of political imperialism and an assumption that our political system trumps any other in the world. I thought you guys believed in re
Report Post »tobywil2
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:08pmShould stupidly also be a capital offense! http://commonsense21c.com/
Report Post »DirtyDeeds
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:07pmPeople like this youngster are only a hop and a skip away from being the next Bill Ayers. A terrorist, plain and simple.
Report Post »motonutt
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:23pmAnother angry homosexual God hating feminised dumb ass. I’d bet if you could see a whole body shot he had womans pants on. A product of socalist communist teachers and parents. I don’t know why he would worry about his comments being twisted by Fox, every thing he said in the whole piece was ignorant, taught to him by the communists that educated him.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 1:58pm@MOTONUTT
Spot on assessment.
Report Post »1Oldfireman
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:06pmAnother Dumbass Liberal !
Report Post »mtnclimberjim
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:06pmPunk a$$ed little bitch.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 7:42pmIf he is looking for someone to be hung, Barney Frank is window shopping.
Report Post »jollylama
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:05pmbrain dead
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:37pmNo, it’s just Godhead or Steelhead or whatever his incarnation is today…….
Report Post »tobywil2
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:04pmYou’re surprised? The lunatic left is always tolerant of other’s views! http://commonsense21c.com/
Report Post »Nlitend1
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 5:56pmarghh!! tolerance!!! how dare they.
Report Post »bringiton
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:01pmHope to see him in the streets.
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:55amSocialist Workers!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:05pmYoung Man…you are a victim of Communistic propaganda. What you are actually saying is that you yourself should be hanged..because you are being a traitor to America. Why don’t you go try living in a Communist country or in an Arab country and see how long you would last. This country protects your freedoms, but you are actually supporting overthrowing yourself. You need to go outside the scope of your education and learn some true history. You and ones like you are protesting your own freedom and happiness. You will realize this one day…but by then it may be too late..
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:53amWHEN did Socialism mean “Democracy over your workplace”? Is there any period dictionary or lexicon which features that definition?
Howard Zinn is a screaming Leftist and so is his disciple Matt Damon.
Report Post »Lamarr01
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 8:16pmThe peace activist said, “We live in 1984”. He should realize he is a “Prol” and re-read the book from that perspective.
George Orwell wrote in the book 1984:
“The destruction of words is a beautiful thing.”
‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it…
In today’s parlance, a thoughtcrime is saying or thinking something that is not politically correct. Now, the destruction of words is through misuse. Here are a few words the peace activist misused.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Fascism: centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
Socialism: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods; there is no private property
“Dissent is the highest form of patriotism”. This quote is misattributed to Thomas Jefferson. Howard Zinn made this quote in 2002.
George Orwell wrote the following: “The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect.”
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:52amAs with some of the trolls on this site this boy of substance has been convinced by the socialist elite that they’ll be allowed to choose the form of tyranny.
Report Post »Mandors
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:51amThis is weasel behavior. Gitmo is winding down, albeit slowly. Obama has reduced troop strength in both Iraq and Afghanistan, for good or bad.
These fools are losers who see the end, and just want to hop on the band wagon at the very last minute to say “See, I was a part of shutting down Gitmo. See, I got the troops out of Iraq…”
Report Post »mikee1
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:49amI would encourage the young communist to TRY IT. Remember, the soft AMERICAN COMMUNIST CANNOT FIGHT. They are not like the starving Chicoms and Russians of the last century.
Report Post »mikenleeds
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:49amthat nut is clearly mentally ill ..
Report Post »but again all liberals have been proven to be mental ill …
they sound be rounded up and put in a zoo and studied
OhSnappage
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:49amThat protesters “substance” has no substance.
So sad that with all the opportunities or nation offers these morons continue to brainwash themselves into limiting themselves further and further.
Report Post »don young
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:47amHe is against war but he wants to kill that women that sounds pritty stupid doesn,t it.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 12:14pmIt is a clear example of how misguided he is. Excellent point, BTW.
Report Post »Bonnieblue2A
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:42amWhat kind of drugs are the fellow travelers putting in the kool-aid for their useful idiots? How many astroturfers are on the payroll?
Report Post »Daniel4
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:42amDear Mindless Idiot,
What part of the First Amendment do you not understand?
What a Tool!
Report Post »Nlitend1
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:39amThis is hypocrisy not irony…i fully expect hypocrisy from these protesters.
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:37amI feel like I live in bizarro world. these libturds are turning this country upside down
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:47ameither this kid has very badd allergies or is on some type of funky dope. fits the definition of “useful idiot” talks of killing people at a peace protest? only from the left
Report Post »MK75Gunner
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:37amAnother useful idiot quoting Howard Zinn. God help us all…
Report Post »MK75Gunner
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:36amAnother useful idiot quoting Howard Zinn. God help us….
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:34amListening to this twit is REAL torture.
Report Post »His hand gestures make me think he’s a Pelosi relative.
AmericanStrega
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 11:33amBe afraid America. Be very afraid.
Report Post »drago
Posted on October 10, 2011 at 2:43pmWhy should i be affraid? Im well armed and supplied, or you?
Report Post »