Is Rick Perry Doubling Down on His Obama Birther Comments?
- Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:38am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Over the weekend, we learned that Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry still has some reservations about President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Now, some say that the GOP contender is doubling down on his view that the president’s birth certificate may, indeed, be forged.
To begin, there was the doubt he expressed in an interview with Parade Magazine over the weekend. But now, in a new interview with CNBC’s John Harwood, some say that Perry has, once again, tinkered around with, and pseudo-endorsed, Birtherism.
This morning, Harwood sent the following tweet:
Watch Perry’s statements, below:
In covering this statement, the USA Today’s David Jackson writes, “Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry appears to be doubling down on the President Obama birth certificate issue.” Jackson continues:
Perry’s apparent flirtation with the so-called “birther” issue drew criticism from some fellow Republicans who called it an unnecessary distraction from other issues (such as Perry’s flat tax plan, the subject of the CNBC interview).
Now, while some outlets will push full-throttle against Perry, claiming that he is definitively a Birther, it does seem as though he was making light of the president’s birth certificate. After all, he’s smiling while discussing how he enjoys poking fun at Obama and he even says, “I’m really not worried about the President’s birth certificate.”
That being said, Parade’s transcript of the original discussion that sparked debate over Perry‘s take on Obama’s citizenship, does raise some questions. Here’s the text:
Governor, do you believe that President Barack Obama was born in the United States?
I have no reason to think otherwise.
That’s not a definitive, “Yes, I believe he”—
Well, I don’t have a definitive answer, because he’s never seen my birth certificate.But you’ve seen his.
I don’t know. Have I?You don’t believe what’s been released?
I don’t know. I had dinner with Donald Trump the other night.And?
That came up.
And he said?
He doesn’t think it’s real.And you said?
I don’t have any idea. It doesn’t matter. He’s the President of the United States. He’s elected. It’s a distractive issue.
Interesting that he called it “a distractive issue” before telling Harwood that it’s “a good issue to keep alive.”
On Monday, MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” the on-air team — led by Joe Scarborough — lamented these comments:
Interestingly, back in September, Orly Taitz, who has become the nation’s most talked about Birther, met Rick Perry and claims that she spoke with him about Social Security fraud. Of course, this means absolutely nothing in terms of what the presidential contender believes about the issue. Still, the encounter is worth noting.
Watch the exchange, then an interview with Taitz, below:
This story has been updated.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 697 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 527 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 353 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 353 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 346 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 346 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 353 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 265 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 346 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (157)
Seede
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:44amOf course it’s not valid. No one in their right mind would believe him when he spends millions of your dollars hiding his past. When a person hides their past they have something that they do not want others to know. It’s just that plain and simple. It is odd to me that not one person in his past will step up and verify even his existence outside of a ring a ding commie preacher and his wife. . That is the most unusual part of this. There should be scores of teachers who would come forward to verify at least some credible evidence of this nimrod. This congress and senate and supreme court are all as phony as a four dollar bill. I would not believe any of them in a heart beat.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:52amYou all look like Orly Taitz. That’s reason enough to hide his past.
Report Post »Lantern
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:00amOh, and somehow, you can see us all?
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:49amThe birther issue is a dead end road. No matter how much you preach it, it will not remove Obama from office. If you want him out of office, drop the birther conspiracy game, learn the facts regarding his socialist agenda, and vote him out.
You will not get those middle of the road people (the ones that actually decide the election) by playing the birther game. You will get them on the right side of the fence, by highlighting the evils of Obama health care, the economy….
Report Post »teapartyconservatism
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 3:01pm@RangerP
Thank you for your service!
Be advised, people can seek truth and justice while preparing to cast an informed vote.
Know this truth, the usurper Obama has violated the Constitution! http://www.ObamaNotEligible.com
The Constitution is jeopardized when ignored and brings our freedom under attack! Members of our beloved military has sworn a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. When debriefed upon being decommissioned or ending enlistment, none are relieved of that sacred oath.
Even with the much maligned truth on their side, multitudes mislead and misinformed by the media tremble in fear, too weak in mind or body to fight for their freedom, seem sadly defeated and about to surrender all; yet in their heart of hearts many still dare hope silently screamed prayers might be answered by others stronger than they, ready willing and able to fight any foe, any where, any time. The United States Army Rangers have always been among first in answering those prayers “Sua Sponte” steadfastly securing and preserving American liberty!
So now, while waiting to vote, will you also again stand and deliver in defense of your Constitution? If so, then your mission Ranger, is to arm yourself and others with the truth. It’s time to demand justice! Encourage others to rise up with you, emboldened by your fighting spirit. Lead the way Ranger! Yell your battle cry, FOLLOW ME.
Report Post »Creg Maroney
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 5:54pmNew York State Board of Election caught trying to amend The U.S. Constitution by making false statement about Presidential eligibility requirement.
Report Post »http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/13/new-york-state-board-of-elections-makes-false-statement-about-article-ii-qualification/
Creg Maroney
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 5:59pm“Previous versions of the New York State Board of Elections website that listed the qualifications for the Presidential Candidates to be a Natural Born Citizen have not only been scrubbed, but their website has html source code embedded to prevent archiving and specifically coded so as to be excluded in archival sites such as the Way Back Machine.”
http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-york-state-boe-website-cover-up.html
New York state board of elections natural born Citizen requirement cover-up.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qGY17DWMlM
Creg Maroney
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 6:52pmNew York state board of elections natural born Citizen requirement cover-up.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qGY17DWMlM
teapartyconservatism
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 8:16pmExperiencing temporary technical issues, please use alternative link: http://www.ObamaBirthCertificate.net
Report Post »Fred-Dayton
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:42amWhy doesn’t some enterprising investigative journalist take on the task of dismantling and killing once and for all the “birther movement?” They would likely win a pulitzer for being the reporter who ending the birther movement and their paper would be lauded for the series- so why has there not been such a series? Simple to do – (1) show that the 1961 newspaper announcements could not have resulted from self reporting of a birth by a relative and must be proof of Hawaii birth – this kills the “not born in USA contention” and the “short form certificate comes from a self reported bith.” (2) show that the contention of Abobe experts that the recently released long form is a forgery are baseless by disputing each forgery argument they make. (3) show that the founder’s intent in demanding “natural born citizen” was not two citizen parents – showing evidence of that they really meant from laws and writings of that time period. (4) show that the Connecticut SSAN used by the president is an original issue to him and just a clerical error in choosing the coding. (5) show that he did not enter college as a foreign student – claiming to be Indonesian or Kenyan. (6) show that he did not claim to be Muslim requesting a Muslim college roommate. (7) show that he was not adopted in Indonesia. I think that pretty well covers all the major birther arguments that need to be refuted to kill this issue once and for all. The discussions can then focus on political/economic philosophy
Report Post »Locked
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:49am“Why doesn’t some enterprising investigative journalist take on the task of dismantling and killing once and for all the “birther movement?””
It has been, thoroughly and completely. The only people who don’t believe it
Report Post »1) Refuse to see reason
2) Just want to insult Obama, on anything, regardless of validity or relevance
Fred-Dayton
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:52amDear Locked – GREAT ! can you give me a hyperlink to the newspaper article/series that did this. Have not seen or heard about it.
Report Post »Lantern
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:12am“The only people who don’t believe it”
Report Post »———————————————————
Are ridiculed if they say anything by the over-whelming, jaded, MSM, as well as the close-minded left and people like you.
Can YOU explain why BHO has so many aliases? Why he is hiding his past? Why, when it’s known his father was not a US citizen, BHO is still considered a naturalized citizen by all the aforementioned? How BHO came to get a Connecticut SSN? Why there were two letters of Certification?
Locked
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:13am@Fred-Dayton
Or better yet, why not research it for yourself. I’ll start with a recommendation of Google searching: “Disproving the Obama birther conspiracies.” I guarantee you’ll be able to answer most of your questions… even if they don’t “prove” anything in the first place. If you can look at his long-form certificate and still deny what it says, you fall into the two categories I spoke of.
Report Post »KingArthurUp
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:33am1) Wrong.
2) Wrong.
3) Very Wrong.
4) Wrong.
5) Wrong.
6) Wrong.
7) Wrong.
Voted for Odumba hey?
Report Post »virgie morgan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:21pmThe “newspaper announcement” of his birth just happened to be in the newspaper that his good mentor Frank Marshall Davis worked at in Hawaii. His grandparents were friends with this man and could have gotten a birth announcement placed in the paper by him as a favor. Perhaps they did so they could show citizenship so he could go to school here etc without having to “become a citizen” legally. Perhaps they knew their daughter would be returning from Kenya and would need for her son to be a US citizen to get him back in the country. Ever think of that??
Report Post »Fred-Dayton
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:24pmDear Locked – I have and there does not appear to be any refutation of those claims. For example – picking just (1) from my list – all sites I have found state that the newspaper announcements trump all non-natural-borm claims and do not even address the birther claim that the announcements could have resulted from a relative self reporting the birth. In reality the internet search you suggest does NOT answer any of the claims I suggested for an astute investigative reporter and newspaper. Perhaps since you are so sure – you could find the place where the birther newspaper announcement claim is refuted. Most seem to suggest otherwise since the address on the short form birth certificate is that of the grandparents suggesting they did the self reporting.
Report Post »Robert999
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:15pmTrump said he had private detectives in Hawaii researching Obama’s records, but that was months ago and there hasn’t been any news. I suspect someone got to Trump. This is a Huge conspiracy with probably millions of people involved.
Report Post »Fred-Dayton
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:21pmIn searching the internet the closest I have come to a good logical answer is on the SSAN – the refutation suggests that it is merely a government administrative error. CT is 06xxx and HI is 96xxx. So someone just hit the 0 instead of the 9 when inputting the zip and it assigned a CT number. This would presuppose that the process was computerized when the numbers were assigned since done manually this would not be a logical error to have made. So to refute the SSAN claim of the birthers all that is needed is to show that assignment was an automated process based on zip input and then suggest that someone hit 0 instead of 9. This coupled with showing that no one else has ever been issued that number and that the number president is using was issued at about the time he needed an SSAN to report income from his first job. That is how a logical refutation is done. Not by name calling and hand waving and “its proven” assertations – kind of like global warming claims and science.
Report Post »100 Million Patriots Standing
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 7:26pmA convenient coincidence to disprove a suspicion should always raise a red flag.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:38amEverything that should have been open about candidate Obama was slammed shut. We have no “proof” about anything regarding this man’s past. He has been the least vetted American president because to ask questions about him was pretty much “outlawed” by the liberals, the radical blacks, the MSM and the Hollywood elite
Report Post »We were told to accept, accept, accept tthis man’s word and look at where we are now…….
Vechorik
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:23pmThis is a good thing, but a sure sign Perry won’t be president. Bet the GOP pushed Perry to attack Obama on these very-real issues, that would be suicide for a politician (like Romney) to touch. You’re right that no journalist will touch it. It’s time we had the debate and questions answered. I just hate to see Romney stay so clean while Perry gets saddled with the “dirty work.”
Report Post »LiberalMarine
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:37amUse the ridiculous birther issue because “It’s fun to poke at him”?
Real Mature.
Report Post »TexasHunter
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:20pmLiberalMarine- Thank You for your service, but tell me where Owebama has once been an adult about anything.. Yes it is fun to poke at him. He deserves everything he has coming to him. You in the service will see it too when he is making your pension checks come to pennies on the dollar.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 8:16pmThank you! You are the only person focusing on the important part of this story – that Perry’s use of this issue has nothing to do with any actual belief that there might be some validity to it.
Report Post »OurFoundingFather
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:37am“It’s a distractive … is that a misprint too?!” – Joe listen to yourself – actually you‘d better not you’d probably convince yourself of things you don’t want to believe are true!
Report Post »Canada_Goose
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:34amThis is just another question Mr. Perry will need to address (stammer and fumble through) during the next GOP debate. Mr. Romney will naturally hammer Mr. Perry on this by coming across as the voice of reason.
The question may also be put to the rest of the remaining candidates and they’ll be forced to either say “I take the president at his word that he was born in the US” which is essentially playing footsie with the Birther base or actually state categorically that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii.
In any case this further cements Mr. Romney as the inevitable GOP nominee.
As an aside you’ve got to love The Blaze writer bending over back wards to cover for Mr. Perry using weasel phrases like “some say” and “one wonders if his comments were in jest (sp)”. You’ve got to love this line … “We will have clarification on the tone and the actual video once the clip becomes available”, suggesting that the Blaze will do an analysis of Mr Perry’s tone during the interview to see if Mr. Perry was joking”.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:24amROMNEY will get smoked in the next DEBATE because he won’t be able to pack the room with his staffers!
He’ll come off like the mandating loving Hussien/Carter Endorsed Big Gov’t liberal republican that he is!!
Period!!
Perry should continue to slam Obama and Romney as others!! Not American!! (Period)
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:03pmIf conservatives don’t get behind Cain (and soon), it WILL go to Romney. I know that the Paul followers/devotees won’t get onboard, but I said “conservatives” — and paul is only one third of a conservative as political conservatism in America for the past 60 years or so has had 3 big elements: (1) free market & fiscal restraint for the economy; (2) strong defense and foreign policy that keeps conflicts away from American soil; and (3) support of laws/polices that further the Judeo-Christian concept of morality. ONE OUT OF THREE DOESN’T MAKE PAUL A “CONSERVATIVE’
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:18pmWell Chuck you sound like liberal pansy!!
ROmney is Obama and you have a chance to support a real conservative like PERRY… DO IT!!
Cain is a BIG GOV’t, PRO-CHOICE, FED-loving, QUEEN OF ENGLAND BOWING liberal republican!!!
And ROMNEY AND OBAMA ARE BOSTON BUDDIES!! BIG GOVT, MANDATE LOVING liberals!!
SO go conservative or watch 4 more years of OBAMA !! CAUSE YOU AND THE REST OF THE COUNTRY CLUB repub-e-licans can go the way of the whigs!!
Perry/PAUL 2012
Perry/Demint 2012
Report Post »Canada_Goose
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:37pm@AMERICANDOGMAN
Report Post »I don’t get how packing a room with staffers ensures a debate win. The media pundits essentially decide who wins or losses the debates regardless of the level of applause showered on any given candidate.
Mr. Romney is too good at the 30 second sound-bite debate format. Mr. Perry will not be able to get him off his game again. He’ll be busy defending his birther comments and his 20% flat tax option.
Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:00pm@ Americandogman
Report Post »Sooo . . . you deem me a “liberal pansy.” Fine. Perry has deemed me “heartless” for wanting America to secure its border and not reward those who break out immigration laws. Perry goes around the Texas legislature (Obama style) to mandate HPV vaccinaations that enrich his crony. He says it is becuse he is “for life’ — but he vetoes a bill banning cell phone use while driving. Consistent, do you think? Perry’s only real selling point is Texas job growth — but Texas has always had a good legislature and a good business climate. If a state’s job growth is determinative of executive ability, then we should be trying to draft the governor of North Dakota, right? Let’s face it — Perry is simply not the sharpest tool in the shed. Tag me with “elitism” for that comment if you want, but Perry flunked out of his chosen major at Texas A&M. The Left made fun of Bush for not being bright. They were wrong — Bush is quite intelligent. With Perry, however, the “dimwit” lable sticks. Sorry for speaking the truth about “your man”, but we had better face reality now AND GET BEHIND HERMAN CAIN before we are stuck with Romney. You seem to not like Romney, so I would hope that you would get on the Cain Train to help America have a Conservative President.
AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:01pmDude the media is in the tank for ROMNEY and if at the last debate there had been a crowd of tea partiers in it!! Romney would’ve been booed till no end!!!
It’s the optics!! Debates are a concert not a sporting event !! Applause matters! ROmney double speaks and is off putting to the average voter!! He would’ve been muted after the Santorum your out of time comment!!
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:08pm@CHUCK
I don‘t know if you’re heartless but I do know that you sound soft on conservative values!! Supporting ROMNEY =’s soft or liberal!! (period)
Supporting CAIN makes you sheeple being lead to slaughter!! Cain is a PRO-Choice BIG GOVT Fed LOVING liberal republican!! We can and will do better or lose to Obama!!
Conservative or nothing!!
Perry/PAul 2012
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:26pmAmericandogman posted: “Conservative or nothing!! Perry/PAul 2012″ — and Perry and Paul are NOTHING like CONSERVATIVE.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:54pmYup, CHUCK
Conservative or Nothing!! Try again in 4 more years!! The liberal repube-licans will lose again no matter what!! You need to check the definition of conservative!! Mandates aint conservative!!
Conservative try to conserve preserve and live by the constituion!!
Chuck if your offended then stop being a soft conservative/liberal and back Perry or Paul!!
But backing ROMNEY makes you a liberal!!
Report Post »Backing CAIN makes you misguided or a FED LOVER!!
Backing NEWT makes you a half a liberal!! (Nixon anyone)
Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 2:16pm@ Americandogman
You seem to ignore what I posted earlier (In this same string): “paul is only one third of a conservative as political conservatism in America for the past 60 years or so has had 3 big elements: (1) free market & fiscal restraint for the economy; (2) strong defense and foreign policy that keeps conflicts away from American soil; and (3) support of laws/polices that further the Judeo-Christian concept of morality. ONE OUT OF THREE DOESN’T MAKE PAUL A “CONSERVATIVE’ ”
You say that Paul is a “conservative”? Sure, you can gin up a new definition for “conservative” so that it will now mean what “libertarian” meant a few years ago (the progressives pulled that off with the term “liberal” back in the 1920′s or so). Hmmmm . . . since it is a NEW definition of “conservative”, I suppose that makes Paul a “neo conservative”. I like it: RON PAUL — NEOCON.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 2:31pmYour responses expose you as either A FED LOVING liberal republican or a MISGUIDED liberal Republican!
OK sir once again!
Paul is a conservative!! Maybe he‘s not a pure republican but he’s a conservative!
Perry’s a pure Republican and 97% conservative!!
And Perry is the obvious choice for people who don’t want just an Ideological candidate! But someone who can get legislation repealed and get the Establishment behind him!!
ROMNEY is a liberal!! You sir if you support Romney you are a liberal!
If you Support Cain you are Misguided or a FED LOVER!!
If you support Newt you are a mandate loving half a liberal!!
Perry/Paul or Perry/Demint 2012
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 2:39pmOK, OK, we AGREE — RON PAUL IS A NEOCON! Are you happy, now? I have accepted your NEW definition of “conservative” for your pal, Ron Paul. There you go. Now you may bask in the glory of your rhetorical victory.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 3:24pmNo I‘ll be happy when you agree that you’re a liberal if you support ROMNEY!!
NEO-CON George H.W.Bush!!
Libertarian Conservative Ron Paul!!
Republican Conservative Rick Perry!!
And anyone who supports Romney is a liberal! (Period)
Perry 2012
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 4:03pm. . and anyone who doesn’t get on the Cain Train is laying the tracks for Romney — looks like Americandogman is a “liberal” by his own definition.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 7:05pmNo because Herman Cain is A BIG GOV”T, PRO CHOICE, FLIP FLOPPING, FED LOVING, liberal republican!!
Perry is the only way to go!!
Perry/Paul 2012 or Perry/Demint 2012
Report Post »Founding Father2
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:31amI know we don’t like when Rove attacks our candidates but he does bring up some interesting perspective. ( http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/oct/rove_perry_nutty.html ) And he even said, unlike Trump this will probably hurt Perry’s election chances. It will most likely not help him because Herman Cain is gaining so much of his steam.
Report Post »Will NV
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:27amWhat if Obama is not eligible?
Report Post »Can he be prosecuted for fraud?
Will all the laws he signed be thrown out?
Will the judges he assigned be removed?
************************************************
He11 yes, best thing that could happen.
Detroit paperboy
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:38amIm more concerned about his time spent studying in an Indonesian mosque, while other boys his age were playing football and building go carts and chasing pretty girls, this dude was studying the koran….. Regardless of where he was born , he is not American. Period
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 6:58pmWe may never know if he was eligible, because there are too many people in the government, media, and the shadow government that will make sure that can of worms never gets opened. And if he loses the next election, he will stage a “crisis” as justification for martial law, and the truth will be buried forever. And if Ron Paul goes 3rd Party, the Obamanation will surely be re-elected. A scary prospect, either way. I see that some here would rather vote for a “true” conservative, even though they will lose in the national election. Well, then, why not Michelle Bachman? She is a “true” conservative, with no chance of winning the general election, but HEY! She is a “true” conservative that we can all get behind. So where is the Tea Party now? Have we all abandoned her? And if so, why is that? Hmmmmmm………………………
Report Post »garyM
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:21amActually the best time to have checked Obama’s birth certificates was when the candidates filed for their candidacy. I am blown away that no one checked all birth certificates. They missed this knowing all the stories that has been out there about his life’s history, much of it by his own admission in his books. Since the authorities missed the boat, someone should take up the slack even though this would not be the idea time to discover that Obama is not a US citizen!
Report Post »riverdog1
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:54amthey did, the state of hawaii said it was real. that is the definitive proof. no need to go any further unless you a re a antiamerican racist, then please keep bringing it up to prove you are.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:50pm@ Riverdog1
Report Post »I am not a “birther”, but you are flat out wrong. Obumbler did not produce a birth certificate until Trump pushed the issue — Obumbler only presented a “Certificate of Live Birth.” Obumbler COULD have cleared things up quickly by producing the birth certificate, but he wanted to gain political advantage (by making his opponents look “wierd”) from being attacked by “birthers.”
We all know that Perry is not the sharpest tool in the shed and this move gives more evidence: pushing the birther issue might score points from some Blaze posters, but it is a losing position in a general election (and probably in a primary race, as well).
Chet Hempstead
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 3:54pmChuck Stein
Report Post »The short-form birth certificate Obama originally produced is exactly like the one I was given when I applied for a copy of my own birth certificate. That was the only certificate I needed to get a passport and a public sector job. Those who tell you it’s not accepted by the government as proof of citizenship and place of birth are liars. It’s the only certificate anyone has demanded from any citizen except the current President.
Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 4:07pm@ Chet Hempstead
Report Post »So, what is your theory as to why Obumbler held off on producing the “long form” birth certificate? I have already put forth my theory. There are possibilities, of course, and maybe I am missing the best of them.
Bill Rowland
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:17pmIf yu buy the birth certificate and the SS number why hasn’t anyone who knew him in college come forward. Where are his Teachers and his transcripts. He claims to be so intelligence, show me some grades. Who paid his was thru college?
We know he went to occidental on a scholarship for foreighn students, claiming to have been Born in Indonesia. Did he lie on his application or is he lying now?
Where are todays Woodwards and Brnsteins?
OMG
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on October 26, 2011 at 1:50amChuck Stein
Report Post »I think Obama did not bother to produce more evidence of his place of birth than was required of every other person who has ever run for President because there was no reason why he should . All of the sane and intelligent people on the country knew that this birther horse manure was just a bunch of nonsense, and the nitwits who believed in it would never vote for him even if they saw a video of him being born in a Hawaiian hospital. The only reason he finally asked the state of Hawaii to send him the long form certificate was because he saw that his country needed Donald Trump to shut his stupid yap for once and for all, and he was the only one who could deliver us from the nightmare of watching Trump blather on tv every night.
Chuck Stein
Posted on October 26, 2011 at 2:48am@ Chet Hempstead
Report Post »So, you go with the “Obama is an obstinate jerk” theory. The theory has merit — he is certainly that way. But I think he is a little more calculating than that.
The other theory I considered was that there was actually something on the birth certificate that would be embarassing to him. One possibility (and because I only really looked at the one produced after the Trump prodding, I don’t know if there is anything at all to this possibility) is that the birth certificate reads “Barack Husein Obama II” — I hadn’t known about the “II” For Democrats, having a numeral as part of your name could be embarassing. Remember how Tom Harkin would mockingly say “George Herbert Walker Bush”? Remember how Obama‘s campaign didn’t mention that Michelle’s brother had been an investment banker? Having a numeral in the name is “elitist” — so it could be embarassing. That is the weakest of the theories. The “Obama is an obstinate jerk” is second-strongest. But our Machievellian-in-Chief most likely played it for political advantage.
Chet Hempstead
Posted on October 26, 2011 at 3:49pmI didn’t say Obama was an obstinate jerk. I think he was perfectly right to ignore the ridiculous conspiracy theories of idiots and lunatics for as long as he did. Dignifying such nonsense with a reply is as demeaning as answering demands to prove that you’re not an alien or a werewolf. I think he underestimated the capacity of his fellow Americans to be obstinate jerks. I believe he thought this would go away on its own because he is a good and smart guy who loves his country and wants to think the best of us, and didn’t realize there were so many dirt stupid morons who will believe whatever they want regardless of logic or evidence, and so many cynical manipulative creeps who would continue to deliberately inflame the cretinous fantasies of those morons, even though they themselves were smart enough to know them to be untrue.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:20amAh, I see Perry is part of the process to ensure Romney is the nominee now. Figures.
Whether it’s an issue or not, to the average person who is not particularly interested in politics, it automatically marks the uttering person of this thing as an idiot. I don’t care if you believe in it or not, most people do NOT. Perry has just guaranteed his irrelevance. Welcome to Romney – The Revenge of John McCain, coming to theaters near you soon.
Report Post »panz
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:39amDream on, dream on.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:47amYour comment makes no sense. Perry bringing this up now will cause him to be almost immediately dismissed by most average people. Whether you like it or not, the media has successfully painted “birthers” into the ‘crazy kook’ corner. Let go of your own tunnel vision for just a moment, look at it from the outside, explain to me how any “birther” comment is going to be popularly accepted? They’re not. Perry is intentionally committing political suicide. Now whether that‘s intentional or because he’s a buffoon remains to be seen.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:55amI agree Ghost. I‘m almost wondering if it’s a plan by the establishment GOP to set Romney up as the candidate. Perry scuttles his chances with birther comments (as well as many of his other faults); Cain does the same with his religious comments, “real black” talk, and terrible tax plan; Romney comes out as the voice of moderation that would be the “logical” choice to appeal to independents.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:26amNope Average PERSON DOESN‘T THINk hUSSEIN IS A CITIZEN AND THINKS HE’S A MUSLIM!!
Check the polls!
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:31amGee Locked,
Sounding a bit like a conspiracy theorist yourself there.
Those of us with eyes, see right through you.
Nice try though.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:41am@Billy
You’re probably right on the conspiracy part; the front-runner candidates for the GOP are just really poor this year.
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:49amConspiracy THEORY!??!?!?
Our govt. has conspired for years to dupe the folks into believing they are looking out for their best interests. Yea .. hello. Like ‘Term Limits’
Both parties are in bed with the media to keep out any T-party conservatives.
As long as they can keep us fighting each other, they can just carry on with their croniesm (sp) tactics.
I’d call that Conspiracy …
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:50am@Locked
Well, some yes and some no.
Why don’t we just let it play out.
Surely you will vote for the eventual victor. Because you are after all, a fiscal conservative.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:09pm“Surely you will vote for the eventual victor. Because you are after all, a fiscal conservative.”
Most likely. Either that or it’s no vote if the victor promises a plan that will raise the deficit or increase government spending. Assuming someone picks a good VP who actually wants to help get the country on firm financial ground, I would vote even for one of these three.
Who’s your dog in the fight?
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:25pmThere’s only two conservatives in the race!!
Santorum and Perry!!
Santorum isn’t a President! And Perry is the ma!! He hasn’t equivocated and the MSM including FOX have tried everything to take him down and you sheeple just go right along!!
Anyway!! Cain is a FED LOVING, PRO CHOICE liberal republican; MICHELLE will say anything to be relevant, MITT AND GINGRICH are mandate lovers and ROMNEY is just a democrat!! He and Obama agree on everything!!
So vote for Perry or PAul just ont be lead to slaughter!!
Perry/Paul or
Report Post »Perry/Demint 2012
AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:30pmMeant to say:
PERRY is the man!! (lol)
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:58pm@Locked
Not real fond of any of the front-runners to tell you the truth.
I would have preferred Paul Ryan.
But now, I would have to go with Cain, unless Newt can find a way to move up. But I don’t see that happening.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 3:06pm@ Billy — you have it! Get on the Cain Train or hand Romney the nomination. I, for one, am on the Cain Train. Those who are against Cain are most likely NOT racist, but they certainly ARE (knowingly or unknowingly) “laying the track” for Romney’s train.
Report Post »TWO BITS
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:19am“I have no reason to think otherwise” is definitive to me. Unlike “professional” journalists, however, my time is not devoted to sifting through ashes for a remnant of damaging trivia.
Report Post »palerider54
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:19amA black man , a white man, a muslim, and a socialist walk into a bar, the bartender looks up and asks,
THE USUAL MR. PRESIDENT.
Report Post »DanWesson455
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:23amRick Perry: “L”
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:15amObama has DUPED America whether he’s a citizen or not.
Report Post »Southern Rebel
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:12amFinally, a candidate willing to say the things one is not supposed to say. The BC IS still an issue, one that not a single member of Congress with balls has attempted to tackle. Cowards!
Report Post »Good for Perry to say the things considered taboo from the yes men. (and women)
Locked
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:58amYou‘d think the Tea Party wouldn’t be all over this if it was an issue? There are more than enough members to bring it up, if not actually get an investigation underway. If you don’t trust the GOP and think the Tea Party “lacks balls,” you really don’t have anyone you support right now, huh?
Report Post »paulusmaximus
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:10amI don’t care were B.O. was born! I just want him out! I don’t care what Perry thinks about the birth certificate! B.O.‘s policies are destroying this country and Perry’s tax plan is just another “progressive” tax the more I see the more Perry and Romny look like more of the same bull.
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:07amRick – it was a fun roller coaster ride, I threw my support behind you a few weeks ago, but after your stupidity on not wanting to secure the border fully, then the double idiotic comment about giving in-state tuition breaks to illegal aliens… man you have crashed and burned….
Cain 2012
Report Post »DanWesson455
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:23amRun Herman Run! Win Herman Win!! Rick Perry =’s “L”
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:35amAgree
Cain in 2012 !
It’s time to bring the Mitt and Rick show to and end. ( way past time )
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:30amYOU should rethink your source of newS!!
Sounds like your an uneducated Sheeple!! Perry is the man hasn’t lied or equivocated!! And the MSM which includes FOX has tried to tear him down!! They want Socialism and FOX likes the Conservatives to be irritated, its good for their ratings!!
Anyway Cain’s a a liberal pro choice, big govt fed loving liberal republican and you will be back!!
Perry/Paul 2012
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:32amJoe Schmuck your name says it all! (Sheeple)
Do some research on Cain and then come back to the Perry camp!!
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:09pmAmerciandogman – I respect your views, but right now we are in the ultra-left extreme… I like some of Ron Pauls views – like auditing and perhaps even ending the Fed. I don’t like his Foreign policy and isolationism… though I do agree with his latest ad showing “What if” showing the case that if a foreign country was here in the US, setup camp, had impunity, to protect its interests… yeah I can completely see that….
However if a country invited us and wanted us to be there – Poland for example – then we should work with those who do want our presence, support and strength…
I don‘t like his views of drugs and legalization whatsoever and I think he’s pushing to go a little to lighthanded on regulations — I would like to see more of where he stands on Right to Work and what he’ll do to dismantle the Unions, remove all Unions from government jobs since its a conflict of interest, and I’d also like to see his views on the NEA and Dept of Ed too….
I like Cain a lot, there is a lot to favor about him…. Perry has some very poor views, not nearly as bad as RINO Romney though….
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:28pmSo CapitalismROCKS lets go in for Rick Perry!!
(period) lets not be lead to slaughter by the MSM!! Obama should be and will be a one termer with a Perry/Demint ticket!!
Perry won’t have trouble debating real leftist!!
Perry/Paul 2012
Report Post »Joe Schmuck
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:33pmAMERICANDOGMAN
You Big BULLEY!
Easy … no offense taken.
That’s a typical response when first exposed to the light!
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:46pmJoe Schuck, I‘m glad you didn’t take offense!! Now come back to the Perry camp!!
LMAO : )
Report Post »TRILO
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:05amI have to say that I do not believe the birth certificate either. At this point it is time to move on and work on getting the tyrant out of office. I can not figure out why Perry would even discuss the issue unless bad publicity is better than none. No matter how much Karl Rove and the republican global elitists push for a Perry nomination he is history, and not a day too soon.
Report Post »poetopoet
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:04amAmazing how Glenn Beck calls Birthers idiots and crazies, when he himself is off his rocker.
Report Post »The Eradicator
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:01amHey, everybody!…Did you see the above poster’s comment?…what a funny, funny guy.
Oh yeah, you’re a smart one buddy. Good takedown. “Glenn is off his rocker”. Ha. Glenn is off his rocker because he warns us of what idiots like you are doing to this country. Go back to your Huffpo, your mom’s attic, OWS, or wherever the heck you came from, you dope!
More baseless name calling by the left.
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:13pmYea – off his rocker huh??? Hes accurately predicted nearly everything he’s said and much of this was a year or more before it happened…. when I hear someone saying Glenn Beck is off his rocker, that is code for “Beck is revealing the truth and exposing out agenda, we have to discredit him…”
Sorry, not going to work, Glenn has been ahead of the curve on everything and exposing everything that without him would be quietly festering itself in the background until it sprang out and caught us all off guard and we’d be worse off… sorry, you’re lying to yourself and lying to others if you think otherwise
Report Post »riverdog1
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:39pmto capitalismrocks…no beck has been wrong on almost EVERYTHING. the only thing he gets right is what everyone else says before him. example: the middle east is going to be violent. wow what a visionary.
Report Post »Philo Beddoe
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:01amDon‘t say obamDUH’s, black, marxist communist, is a muslim not a citizen or you will be ridiculed.
It is written in the Constitution: Both parents MUST be USA naturalized citizens. His mother was, his father was Kenyan. Had the father BECOME a US citizen PRIOR to obamDUH’s birth, there wouldn’t be a issue.
This is the same issue Rubio has.
Report Post »Docrow
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:06amYup!
Report Post »jado1981
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:16amWhen you say things like that, you open yourself up to ridicule and to be easily regarded as clueless… Let me clue you in on what the Constitution ACTUALLY says.
Article. II.
Section. 1.
Paragraph. 5.
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Word for Word. I’m not debating whether he is naturally born or not, I am going to disprove your thoughts on the Constitution. Like Glenn says, “Do your own work” Don’t fall into the, “I think it says this, so I’m sure it does” thinking. Go look it up if you are in question.
Report Post »PATRIOTGRUNT
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:58amDoubling Down on Stupid. Rick Perry’s campaign is sinking faster than the Titanic. This will expedite his demise as a valid candidate.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:55amOne way or another this matter needs to be brought to a conclusion — truth needs to come out and the stronger issues to be dealt with — How to restore and save the nation!!!
Report Post »http://artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (cat folk gallery)
EqualJustice
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:49amHe’s been talking to Donald Trump. They all must know SOMETHING.. the Donald has spoken to almost every Republican candidate. hmm
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:49amWhy attack his citizenship Perry? There are plenty of legitimate points to attack him on. You know the press will crucify you on the birther stuff, let it go. The guy may well be a Kenyan and the B.C. may well be fake but, the MSM has convinced the sheeple it’s legit, move on. Beat him up on the economy.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:25amSeriously, I totally agree. Bringing up the birther thing now just guarantees that he’s unelectable. Even if it is fully legitimate, it’s a non-issue at this point if you’re out to bring Obama down in the election. You can’t even begin to assemble the team of lawyers you need in time to get Obama out before the election transpires. If he held this near and dear as a real issue, he’d stay quiet, get elected, and *then* being the full bearing of the Justice Department against the deposed Obama. What a dork.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:33amPerry is seriously BAD at this, isn’t he? I expected more out of him.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:35amHe’s doing awesome! Average voter wants a fighter you guys are looking this through an MSNBC prism!!
I bet you think scarborough is a conservative!!!???
You need to do your own homework and then Vote for Perry!
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 11:43am@Dogman
You’re too deep into your own views to step outside of them and look at this objectively. If you want Perry to continue down this path, then surely you actually want Romney to be the nominee.
Don’t believe me for all I care, just watch what happens over time with Perry. Don‘t be confused when 3 months from now he’s dropped out of the primary race.
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:36pmDisagree Jefferson!!
No matter what Perry does he will be cut at the knees by the coverage!! Look at Pawlenty!!
He’s gotta stay hot!! Look what happened when he was quiet 20 points lost in the polls!!
He needs to go fighterpilot dogfight on everyone including FOX and Orielly!! SMASH mouth!! And then spike in the endzone!! Obama/Romney have way to much cover to go in with a .22 or scapula..
454 casull 12 gauge .60 caliber and hack saw/machete!!
I’m open to ideas! not to liberal failure!!
Perry/Paul 2012
AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:44pmI’m talking about
Osama Obama comparisons the whole nine!! Make him a big joke!!
http://youtu.be/w53TMpk6QNc
My previous post was in reference and was purely speaking political!! I went too far in my comparisons and speaking about the President!! It was specifically speaking about the Mcain Obama debate scapula Machete!! And nothing more!! Perry should play dirty politcally!!
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 12:53pmAnd well know that these are things that don’t matter that we can do nothing about!! But you know what!! The media will spend so much time trying to clean it up that they wont have time to hide his mistakes on the economy!!
Perry/Paul 2012
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:21pmDogman, the fight in any election is over the “undecided or independent” vote. This birth certificate thing turns them off. I agree that it’s a legitimate issue but, it’s a moot point, the guy is president. I hate pandering to the middle because, in my opinion, they are clueless and uninformed. We have to have them though or it’s four more for Barry!
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 1:46pmYes but the independent voter is a low information voter. The independent wants to vote for a winner! By tapping these issues lightly!! Not outright just lightly, he makes Obama the other candidate the outsider! And Rick Perry wins!! independents are ME voters, how does this affect me!!
A me voter wants either there freedom or free stuff! And whoever looks stronger and more able to deliver wins that vote!! Does he outright attack like the Mitt had illegals working for his contractor!
No; that can be a offputting! But does he make Obama a joke, no matter how heartless they say you are!!
YUP!! Let someone else attack him!! Like a Santorum or a Palin attack and then he can laugh about it and ask why Obama has such thin skin!!
He’ll be a racist a bigot who hates middle class and poor people no matter what!! EVen if he’s the perfect gentleman!
Report Post »HKS
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:48amSince this story won’t go away that should say something. All the liberal political pressure can’t kill it and that says a lot. The truth has no agenda and it will prevail eventually.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:07amWhat good will it do, he’s almost through his first year? I think Perry should leave the B.C issue to Orly..
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 7:00pmThe story that 9/11 was an inside job took a long time to go away. The story that Walt Disney’s cryogenically preserved body is in a vault under Disneyland took a long time to go away. The story that James Dean didn’t die in a car crash, but went into hiding because he was horribly disfigured took a long time to go away. The ability of idiots to refuse to stop believing in a stupid story is not proof of validity.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on October 26, 2011 at 6:12amI didn’t say he was an obstinate jerk. I think he was perfectly right to ignore the ridiculous conspiracy theories of idiots and lunatics for as long as he did. Dignifying such nonsense with a reply is as demeaning as answering demands to prove that you’re not an alien or a werewolf. I think he underestimated the capacity of his fellow Americans to be obstinate jerks. I believe he thought this would go away on its own because he is a good and smart guy who loves his country and wants to think the best of us, and didn’t realize there were so many dirt stupid morons who will believe whatever they want regardless of logic or evidence, and so many cynical manipulative creeps who would continue to deliberately inflame the cretinous fantasies of those morons, even though they themselves were smart enough to know them to be untrue.
Report Post »cabnetdude
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 9:41amI am certain that the Dark Lord was born in Kenya.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:05amI think he just fudged his school records to get scholarship aid as a foreign- born person. Think we’ll ever find out ?
Report Post »ScarletRose
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:14amThere is some reason they could never get him a USA Passport in his own right and he traveled to Indonesia with mommy and new hubby on Mommie’s passport after her failed attempts to get him his own. A problem never cleared up before he became President. In spite of some supposed “FIRE” in some Federal office…
Report Post »Docrow
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 10:22amWe will find out after he dies of old age and it won’t matter any more.
Report Post »teapartyconservatism
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 6:15pmObama’s recent release of his purported birth certificate alleging “where” he was born, also indicates his parent’s citizenship “when” he was born. Unless Obama admits fraud, these equally important “facts” are now beyond Obama’s ability to refute, alter or hide!
The now inescapable truth, is that his Kenyan father absolutely precludes Obama from being a natural born citizen, as required for eligibility to serve as President by Article 2, Section 1, of the US Constitution!
Please don’t let the biased media or even uniformed conservative talk radio or TV hosts, dissuade you from learning the truth about his ineligibility or from demanding his removal from office, while also preparing to cast an informed vote in the next election. Let it be their credibility that‘s hurt by dismissing Obama’s birth certificate and social security anomalies while also sadly ignoring the Constitution, not yours! Why risk Obama being reelected by anti-American socialists and imminent vote fraud?
Get the truth about his fake birth certificate & social security number as alleged by experts, and the Constitutional proof that a “natural born citizen” is one born in the US of TWO US citizen parents!
See the simple proof that a “natural born citizen” is not the same thing as a citizen!
It costs nothing to look, but it could cost you everything if you don’t.
How to know the truth and remove Obama from office now! http://www.ObamaNotEligible.com
Report Post »teapartyconservatism
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 8:18pmExperiencing some temporary technical issues, please use alternative link: http://www.ObamaBirthCertificate.net
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on October 25, 2011 at 8:22pmTeapartyConman
Report Post »You are right about one thing, a “natural born citizen” is not the same thing as a citizen. The term citizen also includes naturalized citizens – people who were born in other countries and became citizens later. Anyone born here is born a citizen, and that’s what natural born citizen means. There is no third kind of citizen who is born a citizen but not born a natural born citizen.