US

Is This Picture of a Bikini-Clad Woman Too Sexy for a Billboard? Apparently, Yes

Take a look at this ad. Do you think it’s too steamy for a billboard?

Is This Picture of a Bikini Clad Woman Too Sexy for a Billboard? Apparently, Yes

Some people in the California town of Auburn think so. The billboard, promoting a tanning salon company, went up Tuesday. By Thursday, it was vandalized when someone covered it with a black tarp and spray painted the words “no porn in our town” on it:

Is This Picture of a Bikini Clad Woman Too Sexy for a Billboard? Apparently, Yes

“There is nothing pornographic about the image at all. It shows a beautiful tan on a confident women. It’s a very classy image,” Jeremy McCain, media director for California Sun, the company behind the advertisement, told the Sacramento Bee.

“If you go out to the lake or the beach, women wear bikinis all the time. It’s a very conservative bikini,” he added.

But apparently not everyone agrees. Not only is the vandal obviously upset, but his message must have resonated with others. Thursday afternoon the ad was taken down and replaced with an animal adoption sign:

Is This Picture of a Bikini Clad Woman Too Sexy for a Billboard? Apparently, Yes

According to Fox40 in Sacramento, the sign sits near an elementary school.

“My goodness, we are a very conservative family with two daughters and a young son,” California Sun owner Mike Blore told the station.

Now that the ad has been taken down, he’s upset. According to him, it wasn’t his decision to remove it.

“Here‘s a company that doesn’t hesitate to put a Viagra ad in a children’s show,” said Blore, referring to CBS Outdoor, the company that owns the billboard. It didn’t return e-mails from FOX40 about why the image was replaced.

“Had somebody just called us up and said, ‘Hey can you guys re-think what you’re doing,’ we wouldn’t be upset,” Blore added.

You can watch Fox40′s video report below:

What do you think?


Comments (223)

1 2 3 ... 6
  • Countrygirl1362
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:58pm

    Have seen men and women on the beach with much less on.

    Report Post »  
    • teddrunk
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 5:13pm

      But have you been on the beach with…oh never mind..lol

      Report Post »  
  • republic2011
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:55pm

    Probably some muslims…

    Report Post »  
  • viewthis
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:53pm

    Crazy stuff, if this offends anyone they may want to consider disconnecting cable and never listen to a radio. Dancing with the stars and any reality show has more exposure than this.As does most any other network tv show. Grow up and find something important to worry about. Lord knows there is enough available.

    Report Post »  
  • Progressive Wrecking Crew
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:53pm

    I’m a conservative but see nothing wrong with this, it‘s nothing you wouldn’t see on any beach aside from a nude one…. these are the people that make all Christians seem to be prudes and intolerant of anything to do with the flesh of the human body.

    However, it would be more appropriate in a magazine or somewhere where young children can’t see it but then again how many kids are driving up and down the highways not in the backseat fighting over which Disney DVD for mom and dad to put in? ;)

    Report Post » One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew  
  • 13th Imam
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:53pm

    Just picture Helen Thomas or Hillary in that Bikini. Everybody would want it taken down. See we can agree..

    Report Post » 13th Imam  
  • Strosity
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:50pm

    There’s a difference between conservative and mentally ill. The latter is the case here, unfortunately.

    Report Post » Strosity  
  • temple62
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:50pm

    Not bad looking and much “better behavior” than having one of Rachel Maddow laying on her desk wearing the Buddy Holly glasses!

    Report Post » temple62  
  • harumph
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:49pm

    Whatever.

    Report Post » harumph  
  • niki
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:48pm

    I dictionary that I looked up the word pornography in a few years ago gave the following definition:

    “Something that sexually arouses or is meant to.”

    Is that girl dressed like that to grab attention from men and to be sexually arousing? YES. If they weren’t trying to sexually arouse that would have put up a different photo. And no I’m sorry, that bikini is not conservative. How utterly ridiculous.

    Report Post »  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:46pm

    My name is Anthony Weiner and I think it’s fine.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • USAMEDIC3008
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:54pm

      Tony should you be here. go back to the other
      artical PLEASE.

      Report Post » USAMEDIC3008  
    • USAMEDIC3008
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:25pm

      Thats OK , I have pictures of Edith, Got some of Meathead my Wife may
      want one..

      Report Post » USAMEDIC3008  
  • NormanDeArmond
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:46pm

    I shouldn’t of clicked on this. She is not out of beer commercial norms and stds. Beer drinkers don’t look like that or date her though. What a beauty

    Report Post » NormanDeArmond  
  • Texas Grasshopper
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:45pm

    hmmmm….blaze …nothing really important going on in the world today ? yeah I know …shes pretty hot ….dang …I gotta tell you that your news headlines are not as important today as they are over here at :
    http://www.millennium-ark.net/index.html
    no it is not my webpage but the issues are far more then the Hot Chick

    Report Post »  
  • USAMEDIC3008
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:43pm

    I like it
    Can I get one for my yard.
    If this is porn ,you should never turn on your TV again

    Report Post » USAMEDIC3008  
  • publicuss
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:42pm

    “Okay, I gotta come clean, that’s my sister and I just wanted to get her some public exposure. But, she looks good in those boots, right?” So said the agents twitter ********_******_**@twitter.com.

    She does look good in those boots, but too much exposure for young kids. Local community standards should always apply in local advertising. Should you choose to dissent, you can move away from the community…

    Report Post » publicuss  
  • dontbotherme
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:41pm

    I think people are fed up & their not going to take it anymore!! Enough,.

    Report Post »  
  • betterthantv
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:41pm

    Some people just have nothing better to do than complain. How can this possibly offend anyone? I mean I’m disgusted every time I go to Walmart and see 300lb women in tights, but I keep my mouth shut. It really isn’t that hard!

    Report Post » betterthantv  
    • bikerr
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:44pm

      “they” say the first look is to gather information, it’s the length of the look that will get you in trouble! and you‘re right it’s not that hard…………..wait, what’s not that hard?lol?

      Report Post »  
  • Workforit
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:40pm

    Gimme a break Blaze, with all that is going on you choose this to highlight…

    Report Post »  
    • betterthantv
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:45pm

      This is a fair story. It helps people see how silly we are becoming. Most times when you highlight a story like this there is a change of opinion due to public response. Besides they can’t just run stories about GBTV all day everyday!

      Report Post » betterthantv  
  • I.Gaspar
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:38pm

    there’s got to be more to this than meets the eye.
    There was nothing wrong with the original billboard, and as far as I am concerned, the problem lies with the vandal…and when it comes to mobs and vandalism…you need look no further than your nearest crackpot leftist.
    But why would they be offended?
    Doesn’t make sense.

    Report Post »  
  • chfields62
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:37pm

    Just more proof of liberal insanity……….

    Report Post »  
    • TennesseeConservative
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 6:41pm

      Well at some point we need to teach our children morals. I for one when I see these beautiful women, have to remember lust is a sin. Agreed this is not porno I know I have seen porno. But where do we draw the line? I still have to look at these things. How can I teach my children to be modest, when they see the world around them exposed? Freedom is awesome, but anyone who thinks America is free has rocks in there heads. Everyone is forced to buy and do what our elites say. That is not freedom. That is slavery.

      Report Post » TennesseeConservative  
    • foobear
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 8:29pm

      Liberal Insanity: Teaching gender-bending to 3rd graders.
      Conservative Insanity: Declaring a woman in a bikini to be “porn”.

      Some people have said the model was insane for wearing boots, but lemme tell ya, those beach sands can be HOT.

      Report Post » foobear  
  • Rob
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:36pm

    Maybe they should replace that billboard with the one of the Coppertone little girl with the puppy pulling down her panties… that one seemed to be okay…. which is weird.

    Report Post »  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:58pm

      That was in a different time in America. Very few if anybody thought anything about the Copper Tone ads. Most people thought it was cute. Maybe read Ann Colter’s book, “The Pornification of America”.
      Didn’t we just see a poll about what Americans thought about the rise or fall of morals in America? Most thought moral values weere on the rise……I think not!

      Report Post » Rational Man  
  • wordweaver
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:35pm

    I’d be more concerned about promoting tanning salons and the vanity they promote at the expense of risk to skin cancer than I would be about that photo. It may be a distraction to some drivers, however.

    Report Post » wordweaver  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:50pm

      I think you hit on the real issue with why they want to see the billboard go away. Liberals think tanning salons promote skin cancer and therefore raise medical costs nation wide. That is why they passed a tax on tanning salons in an effort to appear like they are concerned and doing something about health care costs………RIDICULOUS!!!!
      Since when did Californians care about showing alot of skin? And this is not as bad as many other advertisements selling everything else.

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:10pm

      Rational Man,
      You figured it out. Thanks.

      Report Post »  
  • Well-Paid Troll
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:33pm

    What would AYN RAND do?

    What would Paul Ryan do?

    Report Post » MONICNE  
    • beckwasfox
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:25pm

      Not too well paid, I hope. Food stamps and welfare should be about the right speed for the sophistication of your comments thus far.

      Report Post » beckwasfox  
    • Robert-CA
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:45pm

      BECKWASFOX
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:25pm
      Not too well paid, I hope. Food stamps and welfare should be about the right speed for the sophistication of your comments thus far.
      _________________________
      LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post » Robert-CA  
    • Showtime
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 5:59pm

      @BeckWasFox ~

      So ROFLMSO!!!
      Funny! And true!

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • avenger
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 8:07pm

      I know what I would do..

      Report Post »  
    • buzdburd
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 8:16pm

      What would Anthony Wiener do?

      Report Post » buzdburd  
  • ENTITLEMENTSBLOW
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:33pm

    Hot girl on billboard….nothing wrong here!

    Report Post » ENTITLEMENTSBLOW  
  • Well-Paid Troll
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:30pm

    Obviously this is a liberal family trying to hide a fearless conservative strong woman. (But Sarah is better looking and also fearless so just put her picture up, and take it to the supreme Court if they cover it up!)

    Report Post » MONICNE  
  • BurntHills
    Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:26pm

    actually, it wasn’t even a little girl bare butt like the old 1950s 1960s Sea&Ski suntan lotion ad. But times have changed and people are sick of what the deviate democrats have pushed on us and our CHILDREN.
    the town can do what it wants. including go back to the signs on either end of town we used to have in our small IL farm towns.. of course it can be slightered altered to read :
    ” DON’T LET THE SUN SET ON YOUR NANNY STATE/DEVIATE BUTT IN THIS TOWN’

    Report Post » BurntHills  
    • publicuss
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:30pm

      Ditto!

      Report Post » publicuss  
    • Well-Paid Troll
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:31pm

      Those darn Liberals! They obviously are trying to put their so-called morals ahead of honest Profits!

      I hope some Christians come and knock their lights out.

      Report Post » MONICNE  
    • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:39pm

      I don’t see any problem, but it IS in sight of an elementary school.

      Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:42pm

      That is nothing compared to the billboards you see in Las Vegas.
      I thought being in California and all it would be alot worse. I have seen much worse and this one is way more ‘tasteful’ than many I have seen. It’s just a bathing suit. Not a row of bare butts in a thong and topless, like I have seen on billboards in Vegas. Evidence of why they call it ‘Sin City’ I guess.
      It is advertising a tanning salon, so they are show off a tan.
      All that being said, I don’t like sex in advertising…….AT ALL!!!…..Or tanning salons…………

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Patrick in AZ
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:44pm

      I don’t think it is pornographic, but I do believe the town has a right to keep it out of their town. The question is, does “the town” really want it gone or just a few?

      Report Post » Patrick in AZ  
    • Mandors
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:47pm

      It‘s their town if they don’t like it, don’t have it.

      But anyone calling this billboard pornographic needs to be euthanized as soon as possible. Their stupidity might catch on and become a religion. Next stop burkhas.

      Report Post » Mandors  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:49pm

      At Disneyland, the copperton girl with the dog pulling down her suit has been ‘updated’ and the suit is completely still on, but the dog has the corner of it.
      I don’t know if Disney required this, or if coppertone has ‘updated’ their own ads.
      Regardless, I think we’re going a bit far here, folks.
      Is it sexy? Yes, is it PORN? NO WAAY.

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • aragona
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:53pm

      The only problem I see with it is its proximity to the school. The billboard itself isn’t offensive to me. However, if the community apparently takes issue with it and wants it taken down, therefore it was appropriate that it was taken down.

      Report Post »  
    • CaptainKook
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:55pm

      yowsah

      Report Post »  
    • Susan Harkins
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:57pm

      Between the crusty ole Bible Thumpers & The local Boomer ‘Depends Undergarment’ crowd, a lot of skin provokes a lot of noise.

      There is nothing wrong with that picture. She is actually quite pretty. Crusty people should really get over (the lack of) themselves.

      And let’s not forget…”If thy dirty, guilty mind offends thee….pluck it out.”

      ;;;grinz;;;

      ;-)

      Report Post » Susan Harkins  
    • yougottabekidding
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:59pm

      Did not vote.
      Choices are at the far end of the spectrum. One choice should have been “Racey should have been placed in an other location if available”. OMG 30/30 Years/lbs. Maybe they realized she was not a Democrat

      Report Post »  
    • SavingtheRepublic.com
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:00pm

      ^____^____^
      Thats G rated for Pete’s sake. They are so concerned for what kids see they better check and see what their kids are watching on TV and looking at on the internet. Oh and none of those protesting better show their faces at a beach or pool in anything but a 1920′s-30′s circa bathing suit!

      Kids see even more skin on a beach or pool… this is insane but its all part of the plan. You will see things like this continually grow “For Your Protection” because you are all stupid and dont know whats best for you… “thought criminals”

      Report Post » SavingtheRepublic.com  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:04pm

      Come on. Porn?? I’d be more concerned with what those elementary kids are finding on the Internet.

      Report Post »  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:17pm

      The beautiful woman pictured in the bikini looks great to me but a sign is local and it should be up to the local citizens to do what they want to do. The picture, in the proper place (i.e not in front of a church, kindergarten, or on an Amish farm), is not pornographic and should offend no one just as wearing a bikini at the beach is great but is totally out of place in church, school, and many other places.

      Report Post »  
    • TC
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:24pm

      That is a perfect body. Probably digitally enhanced but perfect. Probably not good next to an elementary school. I would have not objected as a kid! Maybe not placed in the right place but she has all the right places! : )

      Report Post » TC  
    • SpankDaMonkey
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:32pm

      .
      Vandalized by Fat Chicks would be my guess…………..

      Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • ComeAndTakeThis
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:35pm

      Billboards like this are put up by the car insurance companies. Just sayin’

      Report Post » ComeAndTakeThis  
    • 1stAmendment
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:36pm

      I don’t want my children exposed to such pictures!!
      But I don’t believe in going violent to bring out a point!!

      Report Post »  
    • Sound The Trumpet In Zion
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:37pm

      The person that did that is usually the type that screams the loudest that he’s a good “Christian” and at the same time judging everyone else to be not as “good” or “religious” or “Godly” or worthy of God’s notice as he is. I am a very conservative “Christian” and I would NEVER post a picture like this but at the same time I don’t try to force my own personal beliefs on others so that they can become as pious as me.

      Report Post » Sound The Trumpet In Zion  
    • bikerr
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:39pm

      @Patrick in AZ– You say it’s not pornographic.I say there need to be an agreed upon definition of pornographic. But who would be on the deciding committee. Larry Flint? Billy Graham?. Senator Weiner?. I’m sure there would be a full amount of volunteers available for that discussion. !

      Report Post »  
    • Rogue Elephant
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:51pm

      IT’S THE BOOTS! Not the bikini!

      This is California, you know. The boots remind them of GW Bush! You want to really drive ‘em crazy? Put up a billboard of Sarah Palin in a ibkini, wearing cowboy boots!

      Report Post »  
    • single stack
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 5:43pm

      That was the Coppertone ad.

      Report Post »  
    • CaptainKook
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 5:48pm

      Rogue Elephant
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 4:51pm
      IT’S THE BOOTS! Not the bikini!

      Them boots are made for knockin’.

      Sorry

      not really

      Report Post »  
    • Showtime
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 5:52pm

      @Anonymous T. Irrelevant
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 3:39pm
      I don’t see any problem, but it IS in sight of an elementary school.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~“
      How’s that a problem? If the parents take the kids to the beach, they are going to see women in bikinis. Heck! As long as I had the figure for a bikini, I wore them. My second husband would not let me have a one-piece, much less wear one!

      And although I weigh what I did when I graduated from high school and was a life guard, I don’t wear bikinis now because “the bikini look” has a way of backfiring after gravity takes its toll. We older women need some of our “awesomness” covered up!

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • OlefromMN
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 6:19pm

      It’s the boots! Who wears boots to the beach? That girl should be ashamed of herself for wearing boots to the beach! And the posture? She could get carple tunnel if she always rests like that. Don’t even get me started on the hair products that are harming our mother the earth. And really, who lays on a rock rather than a nice sandy beach? That rock could be permanently damaged from the body oils that could erode it over the years. This billboard is filled with so many things bad that it had to be removed. Think of the children.

      Report Post » OlefromMN  
    • Professional Infidel
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 6:20pm

      it must have been the boots, that pushed them over the edge, there foot fetish and all ya know.

      Report Post »  
    • 101
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 6:20pm

      That would make a nice wall mural for my man cave, damn that’s a great thought start a business “Man Cave Murals”

      Cannot believe they ripped down a beautiful sign to show dogs that are going to be euthanize

      Report Post »  
    • ManThong
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 6:43pm

      Strange, pretty girl in a bikini on a billboard is too much for some in the state that is the homosexual and porn capital of the United States.

      Report Post » ManThong  
    • avenger
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 7:28pm

      I need her phone number…

      Report Post »  
    • click_name_4_impeachment
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 7:30pm

      Me personally….i don’t think there is anything wrong with it, but it is obvious that some people do feel that way, and reacted…..Now it is up to that company to decide what it’s next steps should be….for that reason i can not participate in the poll…..

      Judging by the pictures it doesn’t look as though there was real vandalism….just covered up…..if so there is no cost in fixing it….just uncover it if you think that is the proper advertisement…..

      Report Post »  
    • Want our country back
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 7:35pm

      I don’t think she shows as much as Weiners full monty. There might be more pics out there, maybe we’ll see one of Weiner laying on his side. LOL

      Sorry couldn’t resist

      Report Post » Want our country back  
    • *************************
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 8:02pm

      So, it WAS pornographic after all …

      Report Post » WeDontNeedNoStinkinBadges  
    • buzdburd
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 8:11pm

      Coppertone sunscreen. God I’m old!

      Report Post » buzdburd  
    • NJD
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 8:30pm

      This doesn’t bother me much, more of a distraction than anything.

      What upsets me is the billboards in Spanish, that upsets me. English comprende?

      Report Post » NJD  
    • HumbleMan
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 10:04pm

      Hey trolls … and there are many … go have a Weiner roast … and don’t save any leftovers. You eat them all.

      Report Post » HumbleMan  
    • Xcori8r
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 10:28pm

      Coppertone was a suntan lotion not a “sunscreen” back in the day.

      Report Post » Xcori8r  
    • tower7femacamp
      Posted on June 10, 2011 at 11:12pm

      I see no problem with the billboard

      Report Post » tower7femacamp  
    • what4
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 12:06am

      Yep…lots of old farts and fat chicks in Auburn, I know I lived there!

      Report Post »  
    • snidley-whiplash
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 12:50am

      Home of the porn industry…………………wtf!

      Report Post » snidley-whiplash  
    • banjarmon
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 12:59am

      It’s not porn but it may cause a few accidents!!!

      Report Post » banjarmon  
    • tasmanianwabbit
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 1:47am

      I remember the Coppertone billboard on the way to the beach on highway 101 in California, It showed the little girl with the puppy. It was animated, and the puppy would pull down the bottom of her bikini and show the tan line on her rear. We thought it was cute. Nowadays, someone would scream “child porn”. There were also the “Burma Shave” signs. This would be in the ‘60’s.

      Report Post »  
    • GONESURFING
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 2:01am

      I’m with TOWER and many others here, I see no problem with it, but we don’t allow billboards at all here in Hawaii, which is nice considering the scenery.

      Report Post » GONESURFING  
    • JustaThought
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 11:59am

      I am surprised that PETA didn’t jump on the band wagon since the model is obviously wearing leather boots.
      (And I can’t believe I actually looked at the boots.)

      If this is porn then Anthony Weiner should be thrown in jail.

      Report Post »  
    • I support God's Israel!
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 12:35pm

      If it causes someone to have LUST in their heart, then IT IS THE SAME THING as fornication or adultery has already sinned:

      JESUS HIMSELF SAID IN Matthew 5:28 but I tell you that everyone who gazes at a woman to lust after her has committed adultery with her already in his heart.

      Report Post » I support God's Israel!  
    • Obama Bin Lying
      Posted on June 11, 2011 at 1:12pm

      These people are just as bad as the Muslims, and the taliban are…..it is called free speech. Go to a public beach, and see what is there,

      This country is an assylum, and it is being run by the Mental Patients

      Report Post » Obama Bin Lying  
    • jackrorabbit
      Posted on June 12, 2011 at 12:05am

      What else is new in California. If they can find a way to make a stink about something, then they do it.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 6

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love