Is This the Person Who Wrote — ‘When Should You Shoot A Cop?’
- Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:01pm by
Mike Opelka
- Print »
- Email »
Since we posted the story about a disturbing “informational” letter found on a table at Occupy Phoenix, the Blaze has been investigating the origins of the item and who might have written it.
As best we can discern, the words seem to have come from a man named Larken Rose.

Mr Rose seems to have some issues with authority figures. His website has many postings and videos that take issue with the IRS as well as the police. In late June of this year he first posted “When Should You Shoot A Cop?” as a guest, on an alleged police-watchdog site called CopBlock.
But who is Larken Rose?
From what we could find, Mr. Rose is a man who was jailed for 15 months for failing to pay federal income taxes. (This might explain the title of his online audio rants called “Outside The Cage.”)
According to the Tax Protester Guru website:
Rose is a self-described anarchist, who has written in private correspondence (introduced into evidence as a criminal trial) that “I don’t actually like the Constitution” because it gives too much power to politicians,“ and that ”I feel no obligation to obey” the law.
It is not known if Larken Rose printed and distributed the offensive flyer at Occupy Phoenix, but they are certainly his words. If you feel the need to hear more from Rose, he has also posted an ample supply of videos on YouTube.
Special salute to Meredith Jessup (over on the Blog) for help in tracking down Rose and his myriad of hate posts.





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (179)
barber2
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:56pmThe Anarchists are globally active. They’re the black hoodie guys throwing things and burning property. The London Mob guys who start things, get the police involved which leads to the injury of the naive protestors who can’t spot their evil craziness and, thus, get caught in the cross-fire . They are the really Far Lefties. They have caused much damage at G-20/ etc. meetings. Basically they are all anti-capitalists, anti-authority wackos. They all have serious anger management issues and a startling lack of normal moral standards. They are very dangerous and they have influenced these left movements which share the bond of HATE and revenge with these anarchist dudes.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:19pmactually, anarchist are the farthest right you can get… anarchy is true survival of the fittest. natures law. no man made laws. the “right” is supposed to be for “limited government”, which is just a notch up from anarchy… we are supposed to be responsible for ourselves. never initiate force on another. respect the Golden Rule. THAT is the limited governing “Right”.
the left believes the exact opposite…
all government, no private sector, we are a collective, there is no such thing as “you”, all rights come from “people who know better”, laws will tell you what you can and can’t do, you are a “cow” and have no free will, government will place you in a job it feels best suits you, the government creates and regulates all jobs.
i’m not for anarchy, i’m just saying… it is the opposite of what the left want… the left want the government to control everything. he and anarchists want 0 government, 0 religion and 0 laws.
i say religion, because religion is, by definition, following a set of rules everyday of your life… hence, “he religiously washes his hands after going to the bathroom”. religion is self discipline, plain and simple.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:24pmWell JB, you’ve just declared that Karl Marx was both a Rightist and Leftist. How interesting.
Actual real political definitions are a bit more complex than you realize. There are left and right anarchists, and many variants of each of those.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:49pmexplain “left wing” anarchy.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:50pmwell maybe left can be anarchist.. i really figured the left are for large government and the right are for small government. i just don’t see how you can be for Any government at all by definition of anarchy.
Report Post »nappy
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:54pm“explain “left wing” anarchy.”
Oh.. that’s easy. Young, brainwashed, college dropouts who are so lazy they think they should be handed jobs and money on a platter because they drank their way through school. They hate everything but they identify and vote Democratic.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:56pmJB: anarchist ..” one who seeks to overthrow by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government , with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.” and .. “any person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against an established rule, law or custom.” ( American College Dictionary ) Key words would seem to be “use violence ” and “ no system of government is desired ” which seems totally irrational – which might be another word to describe an anarchist. The Far Right or the Far Left – both too far out.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 7:00pmOh.. that’s easy. Young, brainwashed, college dropouts who are so lazy they think they should be handed jobs and money on a platter because they drank their way through school. They hate everything but they identify and vote Democratic.
i hear you are getting at… but, couldn’t it also be said that these kids are calling for the government to take from others to give to them? because, who is going to “hand them the jobs” or “force money out of hands of others into theirs”?
that would not be anarchy. that would the complete opposite. in anarchy, they would just take it. not demand for government action.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 7:09pmi guess, you guys probably are right.. anarchy can be both left and right… sorry.
i just don’t see how anyone on the left (which is supposed to love government help) could be for anarchy at all.. that is all i’m saying… :P
Report Post »Anti-Liberal and Pro-Liberty
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 10:47pmThere are a lot of anarchists who consider themselves a part of the left, but there are also many anarchists who consider themselves not necessarily a part of the right, but closer to it. The right in this country is, of course, very corrupt and untenable in many ways, so I don’t know of any anarchists who actually say “I am of the right”, but in terms of our gun-politics, our position on individual liberty, and so on. Many, many, many anarchists these days consider themselves, if not particularly close to the right, “post-left”, in that they consider all leftist modes of organizing to be completely bankrupt, either ethically or tactically or both.
Speaking generally, the anarchist movement in Arizona (particularly Phoenix, where most of ‘em are) has had a somewhat close relationship to libertarians in the state. In late 2009, Tea Party folks, anarchists, and a lot of Indians joined together to counterprotest the National Socialist Movement (real American Nazis) who were holding a rally against illegal immigration.
The anarchists (and the Indians) want no borders at all, of course, so it’s interesting that there was that level of cooperation.
Anarchists are in full support of an armed population and, so far, they’ve been willing to call this government what it is (tyranny) while all some libertarians do is throw slurs at the president. Who cares if he’s a Muslim, a Marxist, or not? He’s the enemy.
Lots of the young anarchists are hella dumb, though, that
Report Post »nelbert
Posted on October 29, 2011 at 5:51amTo J.B. Kibbs:
Report Post »You might try going to Rose‘s website to see whether he’s on the right or left. I think I see what you’re trying to say – that anarchy is the smallest government you can have – but it seems you might be too caught up in verbiage.
MBA
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:54pmThat pretty much sums up liberals.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:07pmWait…so liberals don’t like the income tax, don’t feel that they should bow down to un Constitutional government agencies, and don’t feel that a police badge grants you immunity from laws and civility?
I’m going to need to know more about this guy before I deign to judge him. Just saying he‘s against taxes and doesn’t trust cops makes me more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt than not. Sorry.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 11:39pmGhostOfJefferson says, “Wait…so liberals don’t like the income tax, don’t feel that they should bow down to un Constitutional government agencies, and don’t feel that a police badge grants you immunity from laws and civility?
I’m going to need to know more about this guy before I deign to judge him. Just saying he‘s against taxes and doesn’t trust cops makes me more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt than not. Sorry.”
Hey Ghost, let us when you “deign to judge him.“ ”Judge not” or whatever but I eagerly await your judgement!
Ghost, do you ever take a position on this website? You‘re keen to tell people that they don’t understand your profundity, but not so eager to stake out philisophical opinions of your own in enough detail that someone can disagree with you.
Man up Ghost, if you’re a man. Please deign to give us all the benefit of your deep knowledge and actually make statements of opinion. We beg that you would deign to give us the benefit of your advanced intelligence and depth of in a positive way, rather than just saying others could never understand the concepts you’ve gained from a couple years of college and sheer intellect.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 29, 2011 at 1:57amWell done JZS
Simultaneous deployment of multiple tactics. BONUS $
Seriously my friend, that must be the case. You have to be getting paid by the post.
If not, please use your higher learning to describe for us the personality traits that one must possess in order to invite themselves daily, to a place where they are not liked, or wanted.
Once there, they proceed to mock, insult, and talk down to most everyone with an attitude of superiority that accomplishes nothing but the fostering of more contempt.
In turn, they are pilloried. Usually by a sizable group. His lies are quickly pointed out, and his claims laid to waste. He then comes back for more, and the process repeats.
So if not for pay, would this not suggest a deepseated, psychological malady? Why would someone subject themselves to this? What would be the motive?
It reminds one of a Red Sox fan that goes to every Yankee home game dressed in his Red Sox gear. While there, he struts around Yankee stadium loudly proclaiming that all New Yorkers suck eggs, among other things.
Why?
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on October 29, 2011 at 3:24am@RightsofBilly
Howdy! Just heads up you have a poser posting with your moniker under R1ghtsofBilly….. Saw it in the “gay reversal” story….
Hope you are doing good. Stay safe!
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on October 29, 2011 at 1:38pmThanks OKIE,
Hope you are well also.
Liberals can’t fight a fair fight, so they resort to cheating.
JZS, did you hack my account?
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:11amThe ever present plastic banana speaks-that crazy fun loving margaritas in the rain JZS.
I’ll deign judgement-by our constitution and various federal, state, and municipal laws, this guy is probably in violation of lawful conduct. If it’s his right of free speech, then I wonder how the archives would represent your past positions regarding Mrs. Palins use of the free speech phrase “targeting districts.”
I’m sure that you have made every attempt at being consistent in your use of language during your kabuki theater. Lord knows you love to hold everyone accountable for theirs. Let’s see- when is it alright to shoot JZS? Sounds kinda scary huh? Well if jzs is acting lawfully it is never ok to shoot jzs. If jzs is acting outside of official law and is attempting to deprive a person of life liberty, or property, jzs can be shot.
I know you have zero honor. I know you are a paid sorostitute. Those statements alone prove one another. One day y’all love the cops and protect their pensions, next day they’re pigs and grounds for shooting them are promoted. Starting to see why the hippies can’t seem to garner the support of the middle class they claim to protect?
I bet you are liberal professor educated. Maybe one day we will be digging trenches together while our rulers float on yachts. You’ll ask me how this all happened and why you were sold out. I’ll respond that a person who would commit treason against their own country could never be trusted.
You will w
Report Post »TexasTea45
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:47pmYou folks are way to nice. Let’s start the Cuban boat lift in reverse, with this guy. We find a leaking boat and give him just enough food and water to make Cuba and tell him that if we see him again it is he that will be shot not the Police.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:17pmSo you’re all for the most brutal collection agency in the world and for the income tax then? Didn’t conservatives used to actively protest the income tax?
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 7:48pmIncome tax is unconstitutional…it is non-apportioned, and therefore not legal
Report Post »SiToNiTsOrOs1
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:44pmThis person not only has a problem with authority, he despises any authority and therefore he despises a society of laws. The rule of Law (the laws of a REPUBLIC) is one of the things that make America unique and a beacon to others (including those considered as exiles from other country’s). Perhaps he should read the plak on the statue of Liberty which points this out. Anyone with an ounce of common decency will give NO credence to this anarchist. If the OWS crowd can’t see through this one, then what will it take to get their attention?
It might be those like this heathen who are responsible for the war veteran who was injured. I believe that the verteran’s injuries were caused by the OWS crowd itself. Rubber bullets do not cave in a person’s skull. Could someone really look into this? May all Conservatives STAND against the real radicals behind this shallow movement!
Report Post »whatsupdoc
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:21pmFYI: The plaque and name on the statue you refer to are bogus. The name of the statue was changed and the plaque added during restoration in the early eighties by the socialists. The real name of the statue as donated to the people of America by France is “Liberty Enlightening the World”. The plaque with give me your tired, your hungry etc. is part of a poem written in 1903 by Emma Lazarus. The statue was delivered in 1886 without any plaque and had nothing to do with immigration or Ellis Island. It is a gift for showing the French people that Liberty is the path to prosperity.
Report Post »Will NV
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 8:54pmKeep him away from Tucson AZ.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:42pmHe has been warned that his Ego is so large he should only use Double Doors whenever possible. This is what happens when you give a kid an Award for just Showing up….. Sometimes
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:55pmThis is the kind of stink the OWSers attract and it’s not isolated…this is just another example of the rollcall of repulsive individuals these protests appeal to. Anti-semites, rapists, anarchists, unionistas, communists, deadbeats, leeches, the Ayotollah Khomeni, the nazi party, Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, David Duke…it goes on. This is why the organizers of OSW want the tea parties there…they want either of two things to happen.
Report Post »Either some kind of hostility flares up and the media will pin it on the tea parties thus reducing their influence on any elections.
or..by the proximity of the tea parties the OWSers well declare legitimization (ironically after more than two years by the left of attempting to defame, mock, ignore and mimic the tea parties).
jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:42pmi don’t think anarcists are afraid of guns… lol
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:41pmIf you follow this guy’s website (provided in the story above) and check out his writings you will find an interest in going to “Libertopia.” Then, if you click on the “Libertopia” site that is provided there you will see the “Libertarian” connection in this guy’s anarchism and idiocy. He may be anti Constitution, but that doesn‘t mean he’s not in the bag for the chaos that the Libertarianism ideology would wreak upon this country. Liberalism or Libertarianism… pick your poison.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:48pmno… libertarians who follow the constitution and law, can never be anarchists…
libertarians, in the simplest form, believe that you own yourself and that it’s always wrong to Initiate force upon another.
he is an anarchist… he does not care for our constitution which is supposed to protect everyone’s rights. therefore, he would violate peoples rights, thus he could never be a libertarian… even if he thought he was… he wasn’t by definition of libertarian.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:49pmThat’s such blatant and abject nonsense that it defies any effort to put out any logic. I could spray paint myself white and claim to be a White man, but that doesn’t make it so.
Seems to me that your point of view borderlines on the Bush mantra of right wing progressivism.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:07pmWell yep, now you’ve done it. You do know that Glenn is a self described libertarian right (and frankly, he’s mostly correct).
There you go guy, alienating the constitutionalists. Good job.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:11pmSoooooo JB.KIBS… by your statement that means that anarchists don’t find some aspects of Libertarianism and a Ron Paul Presidency appealing? I personally don’t care what his flavor of anarchy is, but if you follow his trail of crumbs…. where does it lead you? Hmmm grasshopper?
Stormfront.org, Neo-Nazi’s, Birthers, Truthers, Code Pink type organizations etc., ALL seem to to be finding crumbs of interest along the same trail…
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:21pmno, i’m not “saying that”, you are.
Report Post »i said, by definition, he can’t be a “libertartian” if he is an “anarchist”.
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:21pmHi yep. Some strains of anarchism are for gun ownership.
Traditional conservatism is for gun ownership. Using the Yep modifier then, conservatives = anarchists.
Ok, how about this. Conservatives are very proud of their nation and engage in some level of nationalism, as opposed to globalism. Neo-nazis also proudly engage in nationalism. Using the Yep modifier then, we see that conservatives = Neo-Nazis.
Simple math, right?
Do you see the logical disconnect in your assertions yet? Or are you one of those types who have this blind hatred of libertarianism qua libertarianism and you’ll go to your grave screaming at us with your fist in the air? Because if it’s the later, there’s really nothing to discuss between you and, frankly, most people on this site.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:23pm>10TH. Lmao > You can choose to live in the real world and try to understand where these half-wits get the nonsense that rattles around in their craniums, or you can choose to remain in the late 1700′s
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:40pm>GHOST. Are you done chasing your tail with those comments? I have blind hatred for Chaos… that’s what we have now, and that’s what we would have in a Libertarian Ron Paul society.
Who does Glenn Beck support in the GOP nomination process at this moment if you’re going to mention his name?
Alienation? Not a good topic of discussion for a Ron Paul supporter like yourself or any of you for that matter. If Ron Paul were to win the GOP nomination I would beyond a shadow of a doubt vote for him. If someone other than Ron Paul wins the nomination will YOU vote for them? I’m thinking….. NOT?
I think Ron Paul also left the door open to become a spoiler if not nominated which leads me to believe Ron Paul supporters obviously have no problem with another 4 years of Obama.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:55pmdo you mean four more years of establishment?
Report Post »there is only one candidate i’ve heard talk about less establishment…
YepImaConservative
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 7:08pmJB. You need to read..” Left and Right: A journal of Libertarian Thought Archives.
Report Post »Constructionist
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:38pmIt’s always the gingers…
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:22pmlol, at least someone said it. ;)
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:23pmCartman was right about them and the hippies.
Report Post »Berbel73
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:38pmAccording to JZS in the other story here on the Blaze, this guy is a right wing fringe lunatic. Boy I didn’y know that the right hated the constitution and felt no obligation to obey the law. Come to think of if that sounds more like the progressive radical left, doesn’t it? Nah can’t be because we all know from the MSM that these “occupy” protestors are all law abiding good upstanding moral citizens who just want a fair share in life. Right?
Report Post »The arrogance from the left is unreal, although I’m glad that they underestimate us and what ends we will go to to defend our nation and the constitution. They actually think that they still have us hoodwinked, and that we don’t see what they are up to. The violence will be started by the left, the right will end it and set things straight.
AvengerK
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:02pmIgnore JZS..the eggplant just says whatever pops into his deluded mind and he hopes no one has any information on the subject. I’ve seen him do that before on these boards….when the Solyndra story broke he tried to assert that “Bush approved the loan” and he was very sure about it..to the point where he’d be condescending about it…then I had to post slabs of reports indicating that the Obama adminstration in fact approved the loan guarantee in 2009 (note the year?), not only that..they rushed it through and ignored every credible agency’s warnings about Solyndra. Did JZS even blink? No..he’s an eggplant..he just says stuff with no foundation in reality to attempt to defend his lefty cohorts or quotes lefty rote. He’s an idiot…
Report Post »barber2
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 6:24pmAgree. This entire global Occupy Movement is a WAKE UP call to all rational Americans that this is a planned and a looming agenda for America. The true “transparency” of the Obama Administration and their tacit approval of this international left anti-capitalist agenda just couldn’t be more clear. Guess we have the Occupiers to thank for removing the mask behind which Obama had used to hide his true anti-capitlist agenda . Know why our economy has not improved ? Guess.
Report Post »Just_Bubba
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 7:32pmHe doesn’t realize that we are here to back up the Police when they are in the right and the chaos he is after comes to fruition. We have their back dude.
Report Post »A 55 grain Barnes MPG frangiable round to the femoral artery should give him just enough time to reflect on the precious fluid draining from his body and begin begging for help from those he hates so much. It’s his right to die slow and reflect on the life that he chose for himself. Check out the Barnes Varmint Grenade! It is quite effective at removing vermin from the planet when required.
hidden_lion
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 7:55pm“He doesn’t realize that we are here to back up the Police when they are in the right”
What he is talking about is when the police are in the wrong…Will you still back them up? or will you defend your rights and those of your family? That is what his article was about, it wasn’t saying go out and kill, it was meant to make you consider if the police have and are breeching the public trust and what you would be willing to do when it is your turn to be violated.
Report Post »DesertRose1960
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 8:37pmYou do realize this flyer is a hoax, don’t you? Look at the supposed flyer from the Arizona Counter-Intelligence Agency isn’t from them. The address doesn’t get you to a valid site and the valid site has no such bulletine. They have made no such announcement, official or otherwise. And please explain why a Minneapolis talk radio station is the source of the story? And have you read the declaration, it is full of Rightwing talking points, the lumping of ultra-right authoritarians like Hilter, Stalin, and Mao into the Liberal pile. They were a bit left leaning economically, but social policy was to the right. He also references Randy Weaver, a Rightwing cause celebre, not the Left. Sorry guys, this nutcase is one of yours and the announcement itself is a fart in the Rightwing blogosphere. Huffington Post and other Liberal outlets haven’t mentioned it. You’ve been played, and probably by one of your own, too. Enjoy.
Report Post »Mikev5
Posted on October 29, 2011 at 6:09pmI agree with AvengerK (JZS) likes to jump in piss all over this group belch untrue statement’s protest we are the nut jobs piss on us some more act all indignant and righteous then vanish if he wanted to discuss things he should talk not challenge most don’t take to well to that
Report Post »majorsco
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:34pmThe poster boy of the occupy movement is not fit to occupy his own home. This guy needs to go to jail for incitement of violence against the police or he needs to move somewhere where his views are considered acceptable like Iran!
Report Post »NOBAMA201258
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:45pmMaybe he should elope with rose ellen,I hear damascus is lovely this time of year!
Report Post »scout n ambush
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:29pmRose huh?Wonder if he poses as a woman and posts on the blaze.
Report Post »kalli
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:36pmYou may be onto somethere there? Is he the real rose ellen?
Report Post »Shiroi Raion
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:53pmLOL You could be right! Although she surprised me by agreeing with us on there being corruption in Internal Affairs in that story about the border patrol officer being arrested for simply doing his job. The judge must be corrupt as well.
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:25pmThe new Constitutionalist Bailout program, its called”
You’ve head of Cash for Clunkers, and Cash for Caulkers, well now here is something that will actually work, its called:
“Tickets for Passports”
Any Anarchist, Socialist, Communist can be adopted by the “Save America Foundation”
We will meet the Anarchist or Socialist or Communist at an airport of their choosing, pay for a one-way non-refundable ticket to an totalitarian destination of their choosing. They turn over to their US Passport and sign a State Department declaration of renouncing their US Citizenship. They are put on a block-list to bar them from ever being allowed back into the United States and there they go. A free, all expense paid for airline passage to the totalitarian destination of their dreams where they can chant for socialism, communism and anarchy till their hearts content (or until the firing squad for being found guilty of being a dissident)
Only those who want a Republic and are Pro-Business, and Pro-Capitalism have to stay in America and put up with its freedoms, its Constitution, its laws, its fairness and its opportunities.
God Bless America !!!
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:30pmWhere do I donate?
Report Post »BlackCrow
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:31pmOne addendum
Trade them for those who would like to make a better life for themselves in a free country. I would gladly trade one Democrat for two Cubans who want to be free.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:32pmGreat idea, do you think we can do that with the 4000 and some Iranians that Hillary wants to give visa’s to???
Report Post »kalli
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:36pmI wholeheartedly support this and Blackcrow’s addendum. Let‘s git ’er done! I’m tired of listening to their b.s.
Report Post »RAMJR
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 8:44pmLove it…but then most of these would be using the Constitution to protect this from happening. Funny how when the lawless use laws to protect there lawlessness. If we could send half these ‘useful idiots’ to Muslim countries, half of them wouldn’t survive a week. The Christians in those country would be their only protection. I really found it funny when the reporters from ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC were in Libya, and Muslim’s told them by Sharia Law they will lie, cheat, steal and murder those that are not Muslim…and homosexuals,FYI, are the worst to them under Sharia Law.
Report Post »Fighting4America
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:22pmSo do you think if someone was doing a number on this kid (hypothetical mind you) do you think he would call for help or just lay there and take it???? I just wonder at what point might he need the cops? After all, laws suck and we don’t need to follow them!! What a GOOF.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:41pmwhen seconds count, the police are just minutes away.
Report Post »he probably, like 49% of americans, uses a gun to protect himself and his family…
JohnQTaxpayer
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:21pmProtesters lament the lack of violence
Well I can do something about that; just ask ole JQT for a solution.
You protester have my express permission to start slapping the smirk off any other OWS protester that is within your reach.
Come I heard them talking about you they said “you were a closet capitalist and just here for the free sex and drugs” Sooooooooo
Let’s see some rockenm sockem robot protester action, go ahead slap each other silly
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:20pmWhat a bothersome, little twirp. Catch the next plane out, dweeb.
Report Post »JuliePatron
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:20pmI am adding this shining example of humanity to JerkList.com
Report Post »cbazan3
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:19pmThis is what liberalism produces. Garbage in, garbage out.
Report Post »citygirl56
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:12pmOne of the greatest things about America is that if you don’t like it here, you have the right and responsibility to leave !!
Report Post »theaveng
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:20pmOur Founders didn’t leave. They stayed, they declared independence, and they created new governance (Articles of Confederation; then the Constitution)
Report Post ».
mrsmileyface
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:09pmKarma is going to catch up to mr rose. One day hes going to need a cop. And the cop will be there to remember what he wrote and look the other way on the crime being commited on him. Again karma is a _____.
Report Post »theaveng
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:19pmWhat’s te purpose of having the Right to Revolt against oppressive giovernent (the 2nd Amendment) if you don’t use it? I don’t think these cops have done anything to deserve being shot, but the two cops that killed a Homeless man two months ago? Absolutely.
Report Post »mzee26
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:29pmNo, what will happen is that the police officer will help him REGARDLESS of what that jerk did…
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:09pmNo shock here, this man feels the constitution does not need to be followed? He is free to leave for any other country he wants. And good riddence.
Report Post »LarkenRose
Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:14amI hate to ruin the mythology that has grown up around the Constitution, but a lot of the Founding Fathers–including Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson–didn’t LIKE the Constitution, and knew it would grow into an uncontrollable beast. So I wonder, would you also tell all the anti-federalists that they should love it or get out? (Read Federalist Paper #45, and see just how misguided–or dishonest–their predictions show the federalists to have been.) The Constitution directly CONTRADICTS the Declaration of Independence. Maybe if you read them, instead of blindly worshiping them, you would have noticed that.
Report Post »JediPatriot
Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:06pm@ LarkenRose – To be more exact, some of the founding fathers (Alexander Hamilton – to be specific) didn’t agree with the Bill of Rights because they knew that the government would limit us to those specific rights. And, of course, they were right.
Report Post »Peace
hidden_lion
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:08pmI wonder what was the statute they cited in his arrest, apparently there is no such law to be broken, so how are they able to convict people for not paying federal income tax?
Report Post »Ricky Tidwell
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:08pmHow about now?
Report Post »http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ill-kill-every-one-of-you-motherfuers-second-explosive-canton-cop-video-emerges/
Everyone was all for shooting the heck out of this “cop”, but the guy who, allegedly, wrote this “letter” is being crucified for believing that we the people have a right to life without tyranny. I‘m just glad it wasn’t me in Ohio that night, because somebody damn sure would have gotten shot.
hidden_lion
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 8:03pmExactly, the article wasn’t about how to deal with cops, it was when deal with oppressors/gone bad.
Report Post »right
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:07pmWhat a nice guy to have on your side Occupy nuts.
Report Post »Proverbs30v5
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:07pmI wonder what kind of treatment you get from the communist or marxist or radical muslim regimes if you fail to pay your taxes.
Report Post »hineni
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:06pmEx marine Scott Evans also had problems with authority: http://patdollard.com/2011/10/disgraced-iraq-war-veteran-cocain-addict-injured-at-ows-oakland-is-founder-of-ihatethemarinecorp-com-website/
Report Post »Rajabear1
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:17pmAhhhh, adds a bit more clarity to ex military phenom. I really wonder what is the true percentage of military have issues like this who will have no problem turning their back on the Constitution and freedom. It breaks my heart and scares the jeepers out of me.
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on October 28, 2011 at 5:57pmThank You for this news, now i am really glad he got his bell rung, karma is real.
Report Post »