Jon Stewart Joins the Anti-Gingrich Chorus: ‘Republican Voters, Don‘t Do This’
- Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:03pm by
Buck Sexton
- Print »
- Email »
During a segment on Thursday evening titled, “Intervention 2012,” Jon Stewart offered some unsolicited advice to Republicans across the country regarding Newt Gingrich’s recent rise in the polls.
In a nutshell, Stewart, with his trademark snark, told Republican voters who seem inclined to vote for Gingrich, “don’t do this.” First, he pointed out the former House Speaker’s meteoric rise in the polls, and showed a snippet of Gingrich saying, “odds are very high I’m going to be the nominee.”
With that premise in place, Stewart and his team then ripped on the candidate with a variety of damning clips, including one in which MSNBC host Joe Scarborough slammed Gingrich, saying, “He is not a nice human being, he is a bad person…he is a terrible person.”
On the comparison Gingrich has made of himself to Reagan, Stewart offered that “Reagan had a certain charm and gentility. Gingrich is Reagan abandoned as a child and raised by a family of caucuses.”
To finish off his attack on Gingrich, Stewart turns to a clip of Glenn Beck, during which Beck says Gingrich is the only Republican nominee he could not support.
Here is the first clip, courtesy of Comedy Central, in which Stewart begins his anti-Newt screed:
And here is the second part of the Daily Show segment, which includes Stewart’s disbelieving reference in the last 30 seconds that “Glenn Beck cannot support Newt Gingrich!”:
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 700 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 533 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 360 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 357 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 355 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 355 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 360 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 274 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 148 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 355 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (199)
garyM
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:35pmSure Jon is joining in , he is an Obama fan and he wants 4 more years. He knows Newt has the best chance of unseating Obama. Duh! I can‘t see why Beck can’t see that. Beck is just is so set on having a brother in his church the White House he can’t help it I guess! If Romney gets the nomination, I am fearful it will be Obama and not Romney. I’ll vote for Romney if he gets the nomination just like I did McCain and results will be the same. Lets see McCain beats Romney in the primary, Obama beats McCain in the general, do I want Romney? NO. Because I want someone who can beat abd remove Obama!
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:39pmNewt is a walking, talking campaign commercial for Barack Obama:
————————————————————————-
“When Gingrich met Yasser Arafat
By Laura Rozen | The Envoy – Wed, Dec 14, 2011
GOP presidential frontrunner Newt Gingrich stirred up plenty of controversy last week when he called Palestinians an “invented people” in an interview from the campaign trail.
“I think we have an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs and historically part of the Arab community and they had the chance to go many places,’ Gingrich told the Jewish Channel last week.
All of which makes the above 1993 photo of Gingrich, then House Minority Whip, embracing the late Palestinian Liberation Organization chief Yasser Arafat, published by the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein, perhaps noteworthy. ”
Report Post »http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/gingrich-met-yasser-arafat-150943604.html
IMPEACHBHO
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:44pmI agree. Romney is my very last choice. This is why the media is pushing him. He is the weakest opponent, one who finds Obama a “nice guy” SORRY, I don’t agree with that assessment at all! Bottom line though, ANYBODY BUT OBAMA.
Report Post »Cabinman
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:45pmStewart is as big a blow-hard as Beck. With the establishment all lining up against Newt, it makes me ask “why?” But of course,Romney is a brother LDS….. HMMMMMMMM
Report Post »bolsen00
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:53pmGingrich is a disaster! He can’t beat Obama!
Report Post »dsm
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:54pmBeck is not set on having a brother in the White House. What do you know about Newt???
Report Post »He is a progressive. His favorite presidents are FDR, Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson. Listen to the interview Beck did with Newt on the radio. His answers are progressive right down the line. Gingrich will be an Obama light.
Do some research on Newt!!!!!!!!!!
Apologist JD
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:57pmI don’t know if you all caught this one, but recall that Beck doesn’t like Romney either. This isn’t him beating up on the leader to help his “brother.” He’s for Bachman or Santorum. The more likely explanation is that he doesn‘t want another fake conservative installing more idiotic agencies and programs which will fail and make conservatism look like it’s to blame. This is exactly what Newt will do. The lesson of McCain that you all seem to miss is that when you abandon principles, there’s no reason for conservatives who have them to vote for you. Thus, Ron Paul has a better shot than Newt does, polls notwithstanding.
Report Post »TADTAD
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:59pmIt matters not. BHO is going to be reselected. Something is going to screw the pooch, and that shipwreck/trainwreck/disaster/charletan/hoax/blackguard will be back to finish the job.
Report Post »Huguenot Descendant
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 1:30pmThose who say Glenn want’s Romney in for president…. It is apparent you are no longer listening to Glenn anymore. You now sound like the progressives on the left, except you are now the progressives on the RIGHT! Yes you people who support Gingrich are progressives that lie and try to trample on anyone who disagrees with you or try’s to get in your way. Glenn has ADAMANTLY supported Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann as his two choices of candidates, and REPEATEDLY has bashed Romney almost as much as Gingrich.
You refuse to know the truth about Gingrich who will only support the UN, grow American government, and continue the wars overseas while stacking up a higher debt. Well congratulations, you have all become as Stalin would say “USEFUL IDIOTS,” if you think Gingrich is the answer to our troubles.
Here is the REAL Newt Gingrich:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jWPz1Qdq1uI
So again, congratulations on being useful idiots as that is what you are. Uneducated progressives on the right who will attack anyone who bashes your precious Gingrich. Geez your exactly what the progressive left is like on anyone who attacks Obama.
Report Post »tweet
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 1:31pmDSM,
Romney is the Progressive. He said so himself in HIS OWN WORDS.
Report Post »http://www.mrctv.org/videos/mitt-romney-2002-my-views-are-progressive
I guess it is different when Romney is the Progressive.
Somehow I just can’t see the difference. Why doesn’t Beck freak out about Romney? Things that make ya go hmmmmmmmmm.
Look for the truth
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 1:42pmvote for Rick Santorum if you want to do the right thing
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 2:02pmIn the age of political correctness, and the facts that America is in the worst condition debt wise and spending wise in it’s over 200 year history, we’ve been conditioned to cow down lest we hurt someones feelings.
Piss on that, because it‘s why we’re in the condition we’re in. Failing to demand accountability, principle and character, and replacing those with corruption, immorality, and sugar coating. NO MORE. Tell the truth! Gingrich is an extreme left progressive/communist no different than Obama, Reid and Pelosi.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 2:02pmI agree, Santorum or Bauchman, to do the right thing…I don’t know where some of you get off…from other postings that I read…Bauchman is blah, blah, blah…I personally think if she were a man, some of you would be all over her or (him)….She is the only one up there challenging these guys on their record, she is the only one that doesn’t have a sleazy background, she is the only one that is truly conservative, beside Santorum that is. Ron Paul blew me away with his iran talk, well if iran were a civilized nation then I would agree with Paul, but alas they are not, and they’ve proven that…Romney, moderate conservative to say the least, newt, yuck go away already, we have had enough of you and your double talk, huntsman, why is he even up there…I believe we truly need a conservative, with the constitution in hand, and Bauchman is it!
Report Post »maggie1776
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 2:24pmThe suggestion that Beck doesn’t like Gingrich because he just wants a brother from his church in the White House is ridiculous. Beck doesn’t support Romney either. If you ever listed to him speak you would know that the only candidates that Beck says he could support are Bachmann or Santorum.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 2:39pmMaggie1776…one of the many things I agree with Beck on…Love your avatar!
Report Post »warriorspirit
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 2:52pmI wanted Cain to win the GOP nomination. When he first dropped out my first thought was to switch to Gingrich. However since Cain dropped out I have looked more deeply at all the others Candidates running. The more I learned about Gingrich the less I liked. I have concluded, not foreseeing any dramatic changes in who is running, that I want Ron Paul to win. I agree with almost all his positions. I was turned off by Paul at first, not because of any of his positions, but because of his hardcore supporters. I made the false assumption that if his followers were crazy he must be too. I have since changed my view of him. I truly believe he is the best person for the job and will get this great Nation back to where it needs to be. My distant 2nd would be Bachmann. I think she is good but not for POTUS (I would like to see her become SOS). Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »Vapor Trail
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 2:52pmgodlovinmom do some research learn some history, Ron Paul is correct on Iran.
Iran is not a threat to the US, Yeah do they hate us…you bet but can you blame them.
In 1953 at the request of the British crown we sent the CIA into Iran and staged a coup to overthrow the government. In the 80‘s we buddy’d up to Saddam Hussein and encouraged him to invade Iran. We supplied Iraq with weapons and intelligence, coincidentally Israel supplied Iran with weapons, in-tell, and direct military assistance.
In 1988 we attacked Iran with operation praying mantis why because one of our ships hit a mine that was planted by Iran during the Iraq-Iran war that was at the time was still going on.
In that same year we shot down Iranian flight 655 killing 290 people 66 were children. The US claimed it was an attacking f-14 tomcat only two nation on the planet fly them the US and Iran we sold them to Iran in the 70′s.
In the 90′s when things had a chance of getting better Clinton imposed embargoes. And to this day the US continues to harass Iran both covertly ala CIA and militarily, in other words our government tries and tries to get a war going with Iran. Iran does not want a war with us they know they can’t win, they just want us to leave them alone.
Oh and on the subject of their nuclear program the US supplied the TRR to Iran in 1967 and weapon-grade uranium fuel for the reactor. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspects this reactor.
Stop falling for the
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 3:15pmAll this history you are giving me is most likely true…I don’t doubt it one bit…But I’m living in the present and when this dude stands up in front of the UN and tells us how much he hates us and Isreal, well sir I believe him and would not put it pass him and his country to bomb us or Isreal…the least we could do is keep a real good eye on him…Paul is dillusional on the threat of Iran….period.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 3:21pmAll you peopel who don’t like paul because of his stance on Iran…
Report Post »Do you think we need/can afford to go to war with them tomorrow? If not, Paul is right on. That is the only way to stop Iran from getting the nuke. We didn’t go to wart with North Korea when they tested theirs and we are still here. Why would we go after Iran, who are actually less crazy than NK? You people are all talk and no substance. The fact is Pakistan has Nukes and that is a bigger liability than Iran. There is no stopping the proliferation, it was just a matter of time.
soaring1now
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 3:31pmPeople, Beck is NOT for Romney, says he’s Gingrich-lite. At this moment, he is supporting Bachmann. Pay attention before you start throwing assumptions around.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 3:42pmWhos talking about going to war with Iran…all I’m saying is that we need to keep a good eye on Iran and not be dillusional about where Iran stands…Paul wants to pull out all our troops from the middle east and bring them all home…so what…we can fight them over here…ummm no thanks.
Report Post »Newter
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 4:43pmIf you listened to Glenn you would know that he is not endorsing Mitt Romney – his LDS brother. He has not chosen a candidate to endorse, but told O’Reilly recently that he is more likely to support Bachman or Huntsman. Just because he isn’t supporting Newt, don‘t automatically assume he is only for Romney because he’s a mormon. Glenn says Newt’s a progressive, Me, personally… NEWT 2012! I’m a Christian working in full-time ministry, but that doesn‘t mean I’m voting for the most conservative, religious Christian brother who’s running.
Report Post »mike119
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 5:04pmAll the liberal media HATES NEWT….so …VOTE NEWT 2012.
Report Post »PROTECTNEXTGEN
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 5:04pmWow. So there is the correlation. I see people defend their support of Gingrich by smearing Glenn as some kind of LDS bigot. Me thinks you doth protest too much. Some should take a look at their own attitudes toward LDS. I was swayed by Gingrich at first, but then I remembered his support of Scozzafava who subsequently backed the Dem. He never made a real apology or acknowledgement of his mistake. Gingrich is cut from the same “un-reproachable” cloth as Obama. He is the hopey changey guy of this election who spouts a warm and fuzzy idea every other minute.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 5:37pmGodluvnmom, Um how exactly are the Iranians going to bring the fight to the U.S.? Magic carpet?
Report Post »JohnQPubliq
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 5:51pmWe know just a little bit more about Obama now, not good for him.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 5:57pmThats easy……maybe through our OPEN borders…maybe through the radical muslims already living here……but rest assurred they hate us that much…we are everything they are against.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 6:54pmGary just throws up on himself everytime he opens his mouth. he loves big goverment and gun control. oh yeah and his guy Newt is a draft dodger.
Report Post »We are Americans
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 6:54pmThe thing I can’t understand is that
Report Post »since Teddy Roosevelt apparently most of
our presidents have hated the USA according
to Glenn. Teddy, Wilson, FDR among others.
When Mr Beck said this week that with Obama
you get communism. With Newt fascism, I knew
my days of listening every day were over. The
worlds gonna end, all states sxck but Texas, and
btw I’m on vacation and buy my book.
If you think all of our past presidents(except George,
Abe, and Reagan have the destruction of
America as their goal. How can you say you
love our country. We are who we are
destroyed the USA
NYSTREETKID
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 7:31pmbeck is losing a lot of us for not saying ANYONE but obama. He think in a all or nothing mind set. you can only split the vote with that type of thinking. This is where obama win. When the right rips itself apart, you just sit back and let it. We need to get behind any one who win this on the right. middle to right /left is a 1000 times safer then this fool in the white house now.
Report Post »ambrosia
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 7:35pmWhenever some lefty Lib pleas to you, “Don’t do this”-
run from the jerk and do the exact opposite.
Stewart is attacking Gingrich because he knows he‘s His Master Obama’s biggest fear.
He wouldn’t be talking about Gingrich if he was not concerned.
Gingrich is smarter & wiser than Obama & his Shorty Stewart.
That is Jon’s problem…..Newt is America’s solution.
First & foremost, we NEED a strong, wise LEADER
to replace dead wood in the Oval Office-
everything else will fall into place with the right leadership.
The mission is NOT only to oust Obama but to reinstate an AMERICAN LEADER.
Report Post »Forward to 2012-
“Do this”………….GO Gingrich, GO West…… and never look back !
rbjet40
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 9:24pmYou must be a Glenn Beck hater or even a Romney Hater. Your accusation doesn’t make any sense. If Beck was so concerned about getting a I quote “fellow church member” into the White house, he would have also nominated or supported John Huntsman. The fact is, he has already stated that he was not supporting either one. According to the latest polls, Newt will not beat Obama, but Romney has a better chance. Beck has just pointed out the progressive past of Newt. and that Romney will capture many of the libertarian vote where Newt will not. The claim that he would vote for another church member is biased. The Mormon church does not interfere with political parties. If they did, maybe they would have excommunicated the idiot from Nevada who is also a fellow church member, but a progressive one at that – Sir harry Reed.
Report Post »singleparent
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 9:44pmnewt is nothing more than a carbon copy of obama…….
Report Post »olddog
Posted on December 17, 2011 at 12:59amDo you believe in global warming,No but Newt does. Are you in favor of the unions,No but Newt is.Do you approve of what Freddie and Fannie did,No but Newt worked to strengthen them.. obama must go but we don’t need a newt…
Report Post »Watchingtheweasels
Posted on December 17, 2011 at 2:07pmGiven the choice of Romney (who doesn’t say it or believe it) and Perry/Gigrich (who say it but don’t believe it) who do you take?
Ron Paul.
Report Post »Daniel4
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:31pmHold on folks! Hasn’t Mr. Stewart claimed that he is a comedian and that all of his statements criticizing, railing against, defaming, ridiculing, [...insert your favorite pejorative here...], or otherwise crapping on the conservative right, are presented with comedic license?
I choose to take this clown at his word and ignore him.
What an Afterburner!
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 1:33pmSad thing is I find myself thinking Jon Stewart makes more sense than Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin these days. Conservative talk radio has become just another layer of the Republican establishment, ridiculing and demonizing a real conservative (Ron Paul) while apologizing for the progressives Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney. I’m not even much of a Beck fan anymore, but man is he right about Gingrich. I wish he’d take it a step further and throw Romney in there too.
How is it that the Republican party, in a tea party environment, has managed to have as its two frontrunners the two most progressive candidates in the field? Remove Romney and Gingrich from the race and I could support any of these people, although Ron Paul is my preference. Perry, Bachmann, Santorum….maybe even Huntsman….all better than Newt Romney. It’s shameful that conservative talk radio is cheerleading the progressive Newt Gingrich right now. If they spent as much energy demonizing progressive Republicans as they do attacking a real conservative like Ron Paul, maybe we would end up with a decent candidate for president. Rush and Levin treat progressives with more respect than they do authentic conservatives. That should tell you all you need to know.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 2:10pmIt‘s sad but in this case there’s reason to agree with Stewart on this. Stewart just can’t help himself, and I believe if had actually considered the damage he could have done by keeping his piehole closed, a liberal agenda would see the GOP losing ALL credibility by throwing Gingrich out there as the nominee. Obama would turn the 2012 race into a blood bath laugher against Gingrich and expose the GOP as being filled itself with socialists.
So in my opinion Stewart “can’t keep his mouth shut” has done right wing Americans a favor. Will right wing America wake-up and send the progressive communist Gingrich into permanent retire, or elect him and give America even less reasonable a choice than the last election?
Report Post »Mike N
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:30pmHe’s not the most likeable guy in the room, but he’s the best person for the job.
To those who don’t think he can beat Obama, just wait and watch . . . Obama’s cronies are trying to poison his chances before the primary takes place because they think Obama stands a fighting chance against Romney, but tremble at the prospect of their socialist leader and agenda being stopped cold by Gingrich.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 3:23pmNewt poisoned his own chances with his record and mean spirit. He will not get a single independent or dem vote. We need to fix problems, not add to them. Newt has no character.
Report Post »normbal
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:30pmHey, Stewart, Gingrich is a PROGRESSIVE, he’s on YOUR side.
Thanks for the misdirection.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:37pmJon Stewart MAKES fun of hypocrisy on BOTH sides of the political system. Just Stewart’s way of “laughing at Newt.”
Lots of Catholics on the left and Gingrich became a Catholic. Maybe he’ll get some Democratic votes from that “strategic move.”
Report Post »garyM
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:37pmI think you are on Jon and Obama‘s side if you vote for Romney because Romney could not even beat McCain just 3 short years ago and let’s see who won, McCain or Obama?
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:30pmthe very fact that leibowitz put the clip of Glenn Beck in there last, PROVES it was all a farce on the viewer. it was all a JOKE segment. leibowitz is an obamaite and he does not care about Gingrich, and he hates Glenn Beck. he was making fun of Glenn Beck and all of us who honestly subscribe to GBTV. it has become the biggest scream of outrage by the jealous brietbart followers and the frightened bitter ignorant obamaite communists.
Report Post »dsm
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:57pmSpot on. Exactly what I was thinking.
Report Post »semihardrock
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:29pmIts a Christmas/Chanuka MIRACLE……….Both Beck and Stewart are buying the same book!
I love it when a PLAN comes together!!!!
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:33pmwake up. leibowitz was making fun of Glenn Beck, he doesn’t care about Gingrich. leibowitz thinks obama is a slamdunk back in
Report Post »conservativewoman
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:29pmI like Newt’s edgy responses and that is why the Liberals are afraid of him. He might do some damage to their precious leader.
Report Post »atYou
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:28pmhttp://counterfeitcandidate.com has some interesting takes…
Report Post »SUMTHINSTINKS
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:27pmYes…it should be very telling when the Liberals are saying things like this about Newt. Am I sensing a bit of fear? Yeah…I think so.
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:36pmDown to their little Marxocrat toes.
Report Post »garyM
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:41pmLiberals my butt, you better check Romney’s record, why would a conservative pick a state like Mass to live in? Why would a conservative run against Teddy Kennedy if he wasn’t liberal enough to think he could win in liberal state. Beck is just pulling puppet strings about Teddy Roosevelt and Newt to draw attention away from Romney’s liberal record! Beck has interest in Romnmey because theya re both Mornons! That’s it!
Report Post »SUMTHINSTINKS
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:49pmNikki Haley hasn’t got a clue…..
http://www.NotMittRomney.com
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:26pmdo not be fooled, jon stewart leibowitz supports obama, period. he would love to make sure no American AT ALL runs against obama.
Report Post »vn8480
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:24pmWell, now that Stewart’s against Newt, i guess that changes my mind…maybe not
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:24pmIm not a big fan of any of our guys, but i would vote for the rotting corpse of a roadside possum before i would vote for Barry ….. Dead possums do no damage….
Report Post »Obama Snake Oil Co
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:48pmThat has got to be the best analogy I have read yet…..I see what Jon did was attack the leading candidate just like is his duty as *******. If you noticed, they go after the leader everytime. Cain goes up, he is out, Perry goes up, Bachman goes up….its the same ole libtardial attack scheme. But no matter. All the turd polish in the world will make Obimo shine……You smell dead possum, we smell turd….thanks!
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 1:07pmMe too!
Report Post »Virginia Joe
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:24pmHow many of you remember the Libs singing..
Report Post »You say Reagan, I say Ray Gun
Let’s call the who thing off …
HTuttle
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:23pmWho cares about racist bigot Stewart’s concern trolling.
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:23pmIt’s simple. Do I agree with everything Newt proposes to help restore America? No. But then, there is at least one point on helping our country from each of the Republican candidates that I disagree with.
Report Post »HOWEVER, the commonality is helping our country, whereas the current Administration is determined to destroy it.
So really, just choose who you most agree with, because in Nov. we will all agree that helping, not destroying our country is the way to go.
M13
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:21pmWho cares what a guy who is to embarrassed to use his real name thinks?
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:32pmleibowitz would lose most of followers in seconds. the ”jon leibowitz show” does not have the ring to it that his young obamamoron anti-Israel followers would like.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:20pmThough I have seen Stewart as funny, he should welcome new material when the conservatives take over next year. Maybe he can go cry to Ted Baxter O’Reilly.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:36pm“Ted Baxter O’ Reilly” – right on the money. That’s some funny stuff right there.
Report Post »jacobstroubles
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:19pmwhy do places like the Blaze even bother to give Jon Stewart( peice of garbage) coverage.
Report Post »People, we should stop patronizing them if they, like Fox News, continue to perpetuate the fowl garbage.
rotcarpenter
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:18pmAn article like this makes me want to vote for Newt
Report Post »booger71
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:22pmMe too
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:31pmThat I believe is the goal.
Report Post »ColoradoMaverick
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:18pmJon: Stick to making joke and acting stupid. Conservatives don’t need Hollywood media ass clowns telling us who to vote for. Save that for the kool-aid drinkers who get their news from the Daily Show.
You are still a funny guy. That’s about it though. Sorry.
Report Post »c.rozycki
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:17pmOh the jealousy John… grow up.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:16pmJon Jon Jon
why are you giving Newt a big Christmas present.
Report Post »If you are against him most wise conservatives will be for him.
If newt scares you – you have just enamored him to the conservative base
RaidersImperium
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:11pmOh but we will do this
Report Post »moomaw10
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:21pmI think too many are worried about Newt from the President on down the liberal line of phonies.. That should tell us something..THEY DON’T WANNA HAVE HIM RUN !!
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:58pmNot me. I care what that idiot Jon Stewart thinks, but Gingrich is NOT a Constitution loving guy, NOT a true small government conservative, and has far too many progressive tendencies. I submit the following as evidence:
He LOVES FDR. Pay attention, he says multiple times that he thinks he is the greatest president of the 20th century. He says FDR is his FAVORITE president of the 20th century, and that he even considers him the greatest political leader of the 20th century. He even mentions how progressive FDR was.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bob-cehwZGM
He compares himself to Teddy Roosevelt, again with a salute to the progressive politics..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi314LJ6uwM&feature=related
and of course his comparison of himself to Woodrow Wilson “I’m frankly a real politik Wilsonian” and he (again) pays homage to FDR as he mentions that “the 4 freedoms still work”. The third freedom is “freedom from want”, a marxist principle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T76lD4zV1bo&feature=related
He VERY RECENTLY (2007) stated unequivocally that the government needs to make the most effective steps possible to reduce carbon emissions in industries. Note that he argues that the argument should be about effective solutions and NOT whether it should be solved. He is part of “the debate is over” crowd…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYv9yd3_3HA
Newt’s proposal to legalize illegal aliens is dangerous
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3d9XXN
AnAppealToGod
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:07pmWhy does Stewart even care? He’s a flippin liberal! Seems to me he would be all for Newt Gingrich.
Report Post »lovenfl3
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:10pmBecause the left always thinks it’s their job to tell us who to vote for. Remember, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:34pmDo you really think Stewart wouldn’t LOVE us to nominate Gingrich. For just the comedy alone it would be Christmas every day. And he’s certain Newt will lose against Obama.
He’s just taking the opportunity to have fun now, and maybe goad us into doing what he “begs” us not to do. The coalition of forces arrayed against Newt is also one of the forces that could drive voters into supproting him to stick their thumb into the establishment’s eye. I wouldn’t doubt that Stewart is playing that game.
Report Post »AnAppealToGod
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 1:41pmI completely disagree. Newt would beat Obama. But that doesn‘t fix Newt’s progressive tendencies.
Report Post »RaidersImperium
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 3:52pm@ Isle
Report Post »you give jonni too much credit. Libs have forever tried to skew perception of Newt by running with– he‘s an idiot’s idea of an intellectual…to no avail. jonni loves rickie. Most Republicans AND johnny cannot believe ol’ Rickets is on stage with his latest idiocy: Tebow-hugging. That wasn’t just puerile… but painfully pathetic. Perry will be an endlessly burning Christmas tree keeping an infinite number of gag gifts hot for every comedian from here to hell. He‘s W’s really really stupid brother. That’s who jonni wants for work. For someone he‘d actually like for the Office I’ll bet you $10,000 it’s Mittens in the middle.
lovenfl3
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 12:06pmNotice how the left always tries to dictate to us who should be our candidate. Here’s some unsolicited advice for you Mr. Stewart….worry about your own guy. He’s the one who needs the help.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdTJR_OYnNg