Jon Stewart Rips Media For Ignoring Ron Paul
- Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:15am by
Buck Sexton
- Print »
- Email »
In the aftermath of the Iowa straw poll this week past weekend, the media universally declared a “new top tier” was in effect for the Republican field, except the second place finisher, Ron Paul, was seemingly excluded from this tier across the board.
Jon Stewart didn’t let this oversight slide. In the clip below, Stewart took the media to task for failing to give even a hat tip to Ron Paul’s second place finish in the straw poll. Ron Paul was just shy of the top spot, yet conservative commentators pretended like he wasn’t even a contender.
Was Stewart really trying to be fair, and does he respect Ron Paul’s consistency? Or was this just a subtle attempt to distract from other Republican candidates thought to be more “electable” on a nationwide scale?
You be the judge, but enjoy the hilarious video, courtesy of the Daily Show:
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Indecision 2012 – Corn Polled Edition – Ron Paul & the Top Tier | ||||
|
||||




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (401)
WTSpike
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:46amWell, like it or not, what Stewart is saying is true. Paul came in first in a post-debate poll on The Blaze, came in second in the Straw Poll, and routinely polls in high numbers. Yet he is persona non grata in the media, left or right. I am not an advocate for Ron Paul for President. But I do recognize much of what Stewart says as the truth here. Paul does not waffle on the issues; he speaks his mind. I may not agree with him on foreign policy, but he’s spot on with his domestic agenda. He comes across as the crazy uncle no one wants to talk about, and seems somewhat un-Presidential in his demeanor. But to simply ignore him is to ignore the People, who seem to flock to him in large numbers. I have a gut feeling that the Republican Party is only parading him out there in order to solidify the Tea Party vote, but they otherwise want to ignore him. Otherwise, why not let former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson join in these debates? The nomination will go to one of the other three mentioned, but to pretend that it is because of a truly democratic process is to ignore the facts in front of your face.
Report Post »Mizurax
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:54am“electable”
What in the f… does that mean anyway. You know what that is? That’s called the media picking their guy. That includes you TheBlaze. I’ve got no respect for anyone who uses that bullsh.. term.
Report Post »Veritas vos liberabit
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:02am@ Spike, Agree! And I do like watching Stewart. I laugh even when I don’t agree with him.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:12amExactly. RON PAUL is the ONLY candidate The MSM does not want to win. THAT SHOULD BE A HUGE WARNING FLAG !!!! The MSM is owned by the global elite and Military Industrial Complex. Ron Paul is a serious threat to their agendas. They are waging a devastating Silent war on Capitalist and free nations to destroy them Economically and Socially and they are so far, winning. RON PAUL is brilliant and educated with 30 years in D.C. being Anti-Establishment and true to his word.
Report Post »He knows more about IRAN’s nukes and the threat of Islamification of the world. He also knows Policing IRAN will not do anything about Islamification and that IRAN could never successfully deliver a ICBN nuke to us. he knows HE knows IRAN can buy what it needs from the Black Market whether we Police them or not. THE ONE reason RON PAUL wants to remain neutral is not because he wants to “give them a nuke” it is because. WE ARE NOT THE WORLD”S POLICE and he understands we are losing our country because of actions like these. PLEASE PEOPLE, learn about the Military Industrial Complex. He can stop this madness !!!! Can anyone here today tell us where we have the Authority to Govern Sovereign nations regardless of how “Crazy” they are. Have we Dis-Armed North Korea, or are we hypocrites? Jon Stewart is right for the Second time in his life !!!
** RON PAUL 2012 **
Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:16amGive it a rest!
The only reason Paul has done as good as he has IS because the media has not pampered him. If everyone heard everything Paul has to say, not just about ecomonics but EVERYTHING, he would have never made it to the straw poll.
Crazy old uncle Ron will just go home after he embarrasses himself at the family reunion and we won’t have to deal with him until the next holiday. And when that day comes, we will seat him at the kiddie table again away from the adults, as always. Sure, we love crazy uncle Ron, but having to deal with him more than on holidays, is just a little too much……………….
Report Post »RETIREDOLDGUY
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:20amLets face facts, liberals like Stewart and Colbert want to be the ones to influence who will run against Odumbo. In that regard, they will push any republican candidate that they feel has the LEAST chance to beat Odumbo.
If along the way they can mix up peoples heads all the better.
When you go to vote in 2012 look at Odumbo’s record, then vote for ANYONE except Odumbo.
Report Post »dhuge67
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:22amIt’s pretty evident that Ron Paul is being excluded because of his foreign policy views. I don’t think the majority of voting Americans will be able to go for his isolationist views; it shows a fundamental lack of understanding the middle east dynamic and the complex problems around the globe, where the U.S. does have interests; in self preservation, mostly.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:30am* He knows more about IRAN’s nukes and the threat of Islamification of the world than 99.9 % of you.
Report Post »The main stream media is making it out to look like he thinks IRAN should have a nuke. I am sure he prefers they do not, but he knows they are a sovereign Nation and we have no authority to tell them what they can and can not have. And as a matter of fact., on youtube I have citizens of Iran tell me IT WAS that we ( the military Industrial Complex ) invaded in 1953 that sparked the Hate for the United States and all of it’s allies. The MSM does not want you to know this either. Any other candidate than Paul is a Neo-Con. Bachmann was the closest thing to Paul, but showed she was a Neo-Con and NO Tea Party member, when she signed the extension of the Patriot Act !!!
LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:42amIf i hear someone use “isolationist” incorrectly again on this forum, I am going to refer to you as a ****** permanently.
Isolationism means that you do not fight, associate, or TRADE with nations. Ron Paul advocates heavily to trade with foreign nations. So therefore he is not Isolationist. He is a Non-Interventionist.
Non-Interventionist.
Non-Interventionist.
Say it with me folks!
Non-Interventionist.
The interesting part of this whole ordeal, is that the Blaze notes that Ron Paul has NEVER voted against the Constitution.
NEVER.
Michelle Bachmann has, with the Patriot Act. If you do something once, you surely can do it again.
Also, she does not address the Federal Reserve, our country’s biggest problem. Yes blazers believe it or not, gay marriage and Muslims are not the biggest problem, it is the Federal Reserve.
Michelle Bachmann is the only other candidate worth mentioning, everyone else is so completely fake i am not wasting time typing them out.
If you people truly want to save the Republic, stop listening to the Right versus Left lies that spew from the media, those lies are meant to control you.
And….Vote Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:43amJon Stewart nailed it.
I said this/posted this yesterday…looks like the GOP/media is trying to manipulate the American people once again, they did this in 2008 & chose McCain for us…the elitist control the democrats, republicans & the media, one big organization that play the American people for fools…the Foxholes have lost any & all credibility!
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »dhuge67
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:47amAs an Army Officer, I can definitely tell you that I would not and could not vote for Ron Paul to be my commander in chief. He does NOT know more about foreign policy than I, or any other experienced military veteran, as others are insinuating here.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:54ami agree with Mizurax. why is fox news making stewart look more fair and balanced than they claim to be? and why is glenn beck backing perry? i thought he didnt care for GW Bush, why support his doppelganger?
Report Post »Bear
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:57amStewart was clever…but all those cheers are from the traditional Ron Paul bus tour that heads doen there every time he runs for president and after a few states when people hear he thinks Iran is not a threat and who cares if they get a nuclear weapon crap….even people at the straw poll said they changed their mind about him after he said that ShItZ… Good bye Israel…. I like 95% of what he says of domestic freedoms in our Country..but his Isolationism doesn’t keep us on our shores watching our enemies, it drives us into the caves pretending they aren’t there until they blow up the entrance and then we are F*****…..
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:57am@DHUGE67
As an ex Army NCO in the 82nd Airborne, 1-504th PIR, I can honestly tell you, that you are wrong.
War Mongering has never solved problems with other nations, and that is exactly what we are doing. To suggest that we need to invade any country that has Nuclear Capabilities, shows a complete lack of intelligent thought.
Shall we invade China, Pakistan, India, Russia, Israel? Oh that might be a little expensive wouldn’t it. That might help further the destruction of the dollar wouldn’t it?
If America crumbles from within economically, does Iran having a nuclear bomb that it cannot even navigate to the United States matter? No, it does not.
Besides, Israel has hundreds of nukes, if Iran does anything fishy you can count on Israel taking care of business. China would not want Iran to nuke either, because they are making quite a bit of money off other foreign nations right now.
Get real Neocon. By the way, just because your a Butterbar, does not really make you an officer.
If you are a higher rank than that, you should feel ashamed of yourself for advocating more Americans to die for Empire America.
Report Post »ILUVAMERICA
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:14pmWhy does the Media think Ron Paul is Invisible?????
Report Post »He’s NOT Invisible
He’s INVINCIBLE!!!
Thats why they won’t utter him name
Ron Paul 2012!!!!
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:25pmSupporters of Ron Paul
Keep up the good fight and keep your cool. I encourage you all to speak up and stand in truth. Contact Glenn Beck and ask him to have HONOR and COURAGE to speak truthful around his contradictions of being NeoCon VS Libertarian.
Ask Glenn if he is advocating war with Iran
Ask Glenn if he is for one world government
Ask Glenn why securing borders in middle east is more important then Americas
Ask Glenn which is more a threat to AMERICA, Iran or the Fed
Ask Glenn why he supports Perry a Buildaberg member, like Clinton, Bo, Bush and not the one he says is most like the founders
For some reason Glenn is hypocritical on every one of these and feels no one will notice or no one will call him out. Being a supporter of Glenn for so long it is our responsibility to.
The one the media will not talk about, Ron Paul, is because he can beat Barack Obama. Dismiss your worst threat as if it doesn’t exist until you absolutely have to.
me@glennbeck.com
stu@glennbeck.com
888-727-BECK
Remember, the British thought the founders were “cooky” to believe in such thing as freedom. Get the word out in the forums. Contact Glenn to address these issues.
TEA
bleedingbrain
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:54pmIt means stewart isn’t worried about paul beating obama. So this is his dialog. The democrats will attack anyone who threatens beating them. So whichever candidate the democrats hate most is who we should vote for. Go sarah! That is why Stewart is all over paul’s stick. Paul sounds like a loon sometimes and that is why I can’t support him.
Report Post »101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:59pmLets see how long the Blaze keeps this up as a top/front page story or they drop it early, if it’s about Bachmann or Perry the stories are up front on the Blaze for days…then we will know how deep the censorship of Dr Paul runs
Report Post »bleedingbrain
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:04pmUnelectable means the media will do all they can to help Paul win the primary. And then stomp him into oblivion by painting him unstable and nut job. We are guaranteed to lose with Paul as a nominee. Don’t you folks listen to the crap Paul says sometimes? He looks weak, his hands shake all the time. He repeats himself way too much. I would rather have Paul than any democrat in the white house though. We conservatives have to be smart in our choices or the democrats will crush us. Mark my words.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:18pm@BleedingBrain
Stewart was pointing out the hypocrisy of Fox with this point of Paul.
Why would the media outlet holding the debate not show the poll Paul won the debate? Then Paul finishes in a really close second and isn’t mentioned but they mention Santorum a far far distant 4th and mention Pawlenty who finished 3rd and dropped out! When they mentioned Paul it was he isn’t really “electable”.
John Stewart proved his point right there. Fox has an agenda.
And your wrong, the biggest threat is ignored, thus the reason Fox is ignoring Ron Paul and not pointing put the Progressiveness of the other fake candidates. It is so obvious it is sickening. America needs consistency. America needs Ron Paul.
TEA
Report Post »one Angry American
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:22pmRational so you have heard everything Dr. Paul has said so where is he wrong Ill bet you wont respond. because you are gov plant, or an uniformed idiot.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:42pmAcutally , upon further review of Cain, I can see nothing unpatriotic he has done. He is definitely Anti-establishment.
Ron Paul, President + Herman Cain, V.P. = Saving America from the global elite **2012** !!!!
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:52pm@DHUGE67 Ron Paul Is a Military veteran. He does know more Than you about foreign relations and the Status of Iran’s capabilities, due to Intelligence information from Governmental agencies. Paul also receives more campaign donations from Service Men and Women than any other Presidential Candidate ever has !!! NOT donations from the Military Industrial Complex !!!! he is also a PhD. Sit down you Clown !!!!
Report Post »angelatc
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:54pm@dhuge67, Might I remind you that Paul was also an officer in the military?
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 2:25pm101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:59pm
Lets see how long the Blaze keeps this up as a top/front page story or they drop it early, if it’s about Bachmann or Perry the stories are up front on the Blaze for days…then we will know how deep the censorship of Dr Paul runs
OOHH, the great Ron Paul conspiracy!! Paranoia seems to drive alot of the Pauline Cult.
Report Post »I‘m pretty sure The Blaze lowers stories to the bottom of the page as attention or ’hits’ to the story dwindle. But keep your tinfoil hat on……just in case!
@ Coyote2
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 2:49pmRon Paul gets my vote weather his name is on the ballot or not. I voted for him in 08 and will again in 12. He is the only hope we have to get our country back for our children.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 2:50pmone Angry American
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:22pm
Rational so you have heard everything Dr. Paul has said so where is he wrong Ill bet you wont respond. because you are gov plant, or an uniformed idiot.
Wrong! As all of you are in the Pauline Cult.
I have heard more than enough about Iran, legalizing drugs and prostitution, and foreign policy to make up my own mind. Paul has it right on some issues and wrong on others, IMO, enough to not make me want to take him seriously. Or you either for that matter!
Whenever someone disagrees with one of you cultists, you predictably start name calling and making false accusations. You sound more like the rabid progressives than any sort of conservative. Why do you think most, if not all, of the Tea Party want nothing to do with you. Why do you think many TPs speak out against you when you try to align yourselves with them.
I am done arguing with you people because like I told another one of you nuts earlier here, I won’t waste my time debating someone with the attention span of a fence post. What’s the use? At least I can teach a fence post to stand up straight and hold wire.
Report Post »That is my opinion and I believe your cult leader stands for my right to free speech to express it!
Don’t like it?……Too bad! Just make yourself feel better by calling me another name or accuse me of something I’m not.
At this point you guys are just for making fun of. Like a side show. Just amusement………..
Clive
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 3:09pmwhat i like about ron paul, is that he doesn’t seem to be a partisan hack. in many ways, he is more electable than bachmann is, because paul can get the youth vote, and the independents. bachmann doesn’t appeal to anyone but the far right and the tea partiers. the center aligned or left leaning republicans won’t be moved to vote for her.
And really, why bother courting the tea party… because we all know, when it comes down to it, the tea party will vote for anyone with a pulse over obama.
Report Post »ClassicalLiberal
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 3:10pmRon Paul is electable and will get more independents and military personnel’s votes! Remember, Ron Paul has received more money from the military than all the GOP combined. He also got more than Obama!
Give Liberty and Peace a chance.
Vote Ron Paul! I will vote for him even if I have to write in his name.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 3:26pmI care about Stewart’s political opinions as much as I care about stepping on a bug. Read: not a whole lot.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 3:29pm@ClassicalLiberal
I guess you haven’t seen the latest Rasmussen poll. Since Perry officially entered the race on Saturday, Paul has fallen to 9%.
Perry=29%
Romney=18%
Bachmann=13%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/gop_primary_perry_29_romney_18_bachmann_13
Waste your vote if you want, to prove a point that know one will know about. And help Obama get re-elected…..Good job!
I say this not to endorse any candidate. Just information and something to think about………
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 4:28pm@Rational Man
Oh no I shouldn’t vote for Ron Paul now because some controlled poll says not to. Those same polls gave us McCain. Keep going off them polls and play the useful idiot the Globalists would like you to do.
Rick Perry=Buildaberg=Agenda 21
Republicans will actually vote for an Agenda 21 candidate…..Amazingly Sheeple!
No vote is wasted. You can vote insanely. That would be voting over and over the same way expecting a different result. The Republicans who keep voting for the same progressive NeoCon globalists and then say I’m TEA Party and for less Government are insane by definition.
Is that you?
Ron Paul 2012
TEA
Report Post »Voluntas
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 4:32pmRon Paul is the only candidate I trust. I know that is a scary thing to say, but I think he truly believes in liberty and the foundation of this nation. Bachmann only believes in liberty sometimes, Perry just seems like a liar (and is a corporatist), and the rest are jokes. Ron Paul 2012! And Mr. Beck, please do not declare your love for Santorum, he is the Republican version of Obama. He would love to tell everyone how to live their lives, or rather force it on them from the bully pulpit.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 4:32pmOkie from Muskogee: Many on the Blaze are simply ignorant but many understand exactly what they are doing and they know that Ron Paul is the only true Conservative, Patriotic, Freedom loving, Constitutionalist in the race. They don’t care simply because they are shills for AIPAC and Israel. Again some knowingly; most simply brainwashed.
Tune in to Mike Church on XM/Sirius from 6-9 am in the morning. Mike will have an interview with Paul. Also Mike has made some excellent Movies and CDs about the Founding Fathers. Mr. Church like Paul is a true Patriot. A man trying to immulate our Founders.
Every election I always seem to be with an outcast.. lol Actually I just pick anti-establishment but this simply gets old.
I remember being for Pat Buchanon, Perot, Alan Keyes, then Huckabee, and now Ron Paul.. Always seem to be fighting an uphill battle. lol
I think it was 88 when Pat won 2 primaries before the entire Media establishment ran nothing but one week of anti Buchanon shows incessatnly 24/7 calling a racist and anti-semite.. he was soon cast aside as the Jewish Media’s assertions began to take the desired effect.
Anyway I will write Beck and we’ll see if Glenn has the “courage” to address his many inconsistencies on air.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 5:23pmNot a fan of comics as a source of news, but he has a point. No one wants to give Paul any credit for fear he might gain traction. Problem is, the conservative commentators should know better—-their viewers choose candidates on their own. I am no fan of Ron Paul as I think he has grand plans and nothing to implement them with—that and he doesn’t think Iran is a threat—but if he comes in second, should be mentioned.
Report Post »BCBORNCRAZY
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 6:35pmRational man has no idea what he is talking about.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 7:56pmBCBORNCRAZY
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 6:35pm
Rational man has no idea what he is talking about.
And you were, by your own admission, born crazy.
Report Post »I guess we are not that different from eachother,……except for Pauline doctrine.
cous1933
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:29pmLibertariansunite,
It is always good to see you posting on Ron Paul stories on The Blaze.
Although there are many intelligent Paul supporters who do a GREAT job (I’m lookin at you Okie) schooling the unschooled neocons, you have a way of putting up irrefutable and concise points that expose the neocons as the unfortunate, irrational victims of the rhetoric of fear that they are.
Friendly advice to Rationalman, Dhuge67, 4blackhorses and any others who try to debate Libertariansunite – you’re in over your head.
Report Post »portague
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:30pmRon Paul I think is electible and could win. The problem lies in congress because they would fight him on all his ideas. however he could veto the stupid that comes out of congress i would wager he would have the highest veto rate of any president. He would also cancel those ridiculise unconstutional presidental orders that are still floating around at the white house.
Report Post »streetpilot
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:34pmAgreed. I have noticed the same thing.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:44pmProgressive Left=Liberals (Open Border society)
Progressive Right=Neocons (New Conservatives)
Agenda 21 is progressive and used by both the above. Liberals use it for a world global open boarder society. Neocons use it to “nation build”. Both are for a global world government. Wake up!
Mitt Romney – Universal Healthcare, flipped flopped about abortion, flip flops on everything….Progressive Right
Rick Perry – Buildaberg/Agenda 21, Mandated vaccines for HPV, illegals instate tuition, NAFTA superhighway, sheep in wolves clothing….Progressive
Michelle Bachmann – Patriot act (more Government), marriage amendment (more Government), requested 16 times for stimulus money (more Government) then spoke against the stimulus and Government jobs.
Ron Paul – Voted small Government for years, even when unpopular. Believes marriage is the churches job not Governments. Would end NeoCon wars and keep allies around the World. Would remove big entitled Government out of the way of the free market. Would remove socialistic programs sucking the lifeblood and ruining our children. Is not establishment, is not Globalist.
Rick Santorum – Flip flopped on intelligent design being taught in school. Flipped flopped on Medicare prescription plan. Flipped flopped on Social Security. Believes in using military and finical aid to spread democracy. “Nation Building”
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:50pm@Cous1933
I appreciate you! You are correct LibertariansUnite has a way with words!
Don’t be political, be Paulitical!!!!! Get the word out!!!
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 9:10pmI’m very impressed with the way so many Ron Paul supporters make their case.
Report Post »In addition to Libertariansunite and Okie – Techengineer, Blue_sky, problemsolver,101, Rothbardian, Americanpatriot01, and too many others to name.
Keep up the great work!
Some of these RP haters are so irrational in their fear and/or hatred they will never have a thought in their heads that didn’t come from Glenn or Rush. But I’m sure that the intelligent information that you people post has converted some Blazers into absolute Ron Paul voters.
circleDwagons
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 9:30pmi’m going to scream!! well i actually did. the term “neocon” is moronic. it is an automatic turnoff.
Report Post »bildeburger ditto. paulbots,paulbots,paulbots. i supported Dr. Paul in ‘88 , time to grow up.
The-Monk
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 9:44pm@Okie from Muskogee
Report Post »What do you think about Herman Cain?
RepubliCorp
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 9:50pmWho RP vote for Dennis Kucinich? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJcnoDfFWhM&feature=related
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 9:52pm@CircledWagons
Truth hurts. You may not want to hear it but it is the truth. NEO (New) Con (Conservative) means new conservative. They coined New because “old” conservatives didn’t spread democracy thru financial and military aid. “Old” Conservatives were non interventionists. FACT
As for Perry, it is FACT he attended Buildaberg. Same meeting as Soros and all other elite progressives. FACT Buildaberg brought Agenda 21. Perry was involved in NAFTA superhighway. FACT. Perry is for instate tuition for illegals. FACT
You can hide from it, not like it or call it a “turn off” but it is still FACT. You wanna put your head in the sand with your rear in the air like an ostrich your choice. Just know and accept what that leads to. Us Ron Paul supporters are standing in truth!
Quit being a NEOBot!!!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:07pm@Rhe Monk
There are things with Cain I find appealing but I’m concerned first with his stance on the Federal Reserve. In an interview with Neil Boortz Herman stated we don’t need to audit the Federal Reserve and that we the people just need to talk to a Federal Reserve representative to better understand. Cain was also very critical of those criticizing the bailouts on his program.
I like some of his ideas on taxes and how devastating healthcare will be to us and I respect his candor in speaking his views. He seems as a good man and is better then the known established Republicans. I just don’t feel his views on how to get America back on track and mine are the same. Not addressing the Federal Reserve will destroy America IMO.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:16pmeveryone should love Ron Paul, i agree with john on this. why are people ignoring him?! He IS the only clear choice…
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:24pm@COUS
Good to see you too, and I am glad that many people on this forum are realizing, that propaganda comes from all media outlets, including fox.
I can sympathize with some of these people in their beliefs because I was, and not too long ago, a “neo-con”. I believed all of the lies.
What changed me personally was reading “The Road to Serfdom”, and “Liberty Defined”. (Although Austrian Economics helped me as well.)
It blew my mind that both Republicans and Democrats push for Statism. I also never understood that Militarism is another form of socialism.
So I try to explain points without being condescending. It is apparent however, that many people on here just violently oppose Ron Paul, just to spite, or simply because they cannot stomach taking back what they have said in the past about him.
I hope that people on this site realize that Ron is our only hope, because if he is not elected, our country will destroy itself.
That concept is terrifying to me, especially since I am still rather young and will have to endure it.
Hopefully we (the true Patriots who support Liberty) will get enough support to change the path this country is traveling….
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:51pm“If Iran wants to have a nuke, who are we to tell them they can’t? Everyone around them has them. Why SHOULDN’T they have them?”
Huh. What in the world does “unelectable” mean?
I wonder…
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:26pmLibertariansunite,
Report Post »Although I’m quite a bit older than you (my first voting experience at 18 was Reagan 1980), our stories of conversion from neocon to libertarian are very similar.
In 08 I voted for McCain and it did not feel good. I started reading Ron Paul shortly after that and was very surprised to discover that not only was he not crazy at all, but he’s brilliant. In fact I could not find a single word that he said that I could honestly disagree with. I also started studying Austrian Economics and discovered guys like Murray Rothbard, Michael Badnarick, Tom Woods. Lew Rockwell and many others.
Throughout the 80′s, 90‘s and up to ’08, under the influence of Rush, Hannity, Glenn and others I considered myself a good conservative. However, now that I’m more educated I realize that this is phony conservatism.
While I voiced support for our war efforts overseas (and our “war” on drugs), in the back of my mind I always knew as a Christian, that our aggressive, pre-emptive wars and occupation were wrong and also that the war on drugs was a gigantic waste of money as well as being hypocritical considering the copious amounts of alcohol our culture consumes. Ron Paul gave me the confidence to move away from those immoral, hypocritical postures.
Thanks again to you and all of the Ron Paul supporters who intelligently and rationally promote todays Thomas Jefferson. Comparing content of pro-Paul posts to anti- Paul posts is absolute proof that we are right.
101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:32pm@ Rational Man
Report Post »I don’t reply to TROLLS
tfendt
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 4:13amGood work Ron Paul supporters keep it up! Just one thing, those who say Stewart is trying to manipulate the GOP primary to help obama are flat wrong. Have you considered that maybe he is just doing the job that the real media is supposed to be doing?–reporting the truth. Ron Paul is actually the BEST candidate to beat Obama. All of the republicans will vote for him over obama for sure. And with obama’s approval so low, Paul is going to strip away tons of votes from him. A socially conservative extremist or neocon (all the other candidates) will run them right back into the arms of the dems. End the wars, legalize drugs, keep special interests and religion out of government. You can be absolutely certain that these issues will resonate with a lot of democrats.
Report Post »ying
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 12:11pmRick Perry is the next president; it’s already decided. He’s one of them, and it’s already been fixed. So, even though you are right, it’s a waste of air to say it.
Report Post »skin5011
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:01pmI like Ron Paul and he’s is absolutly right about us not being able to afford fighting these wars, this country is broke! But Ron is a nationalist and a nationalist will never be alowed to run this country because the world is run by globalist, globalist control the media, Wall street, banking, industery, and yes the government, Globalist control both partys and pit us against each other to divide and conqur by playing each side against the middle, we all know something is wrong but we can’t put our finger on just what it is, so we fall back on the partys each blaming the other for our condition, when in fact it’s both partys selling out the working man in order to build their one world economy, we will distroy our currency, and we will all blame the other party for it, we will get a new world currency and a new world government to control that currency, after we colapse our own currency and take all the other world currency with it, the poor and middle class will be crushed, their saving whipped out and the value of their labor deminished, a new world curreny will replace the dollar and we’ll beg for it when it happens, no one will want dollars any more, it doesn’t have to end like this but thats where were headed, and the situation with Ron Paul convinces me more then ever there is no hope turning this mess around, switching captains on a sinking ship won’t save the ship or slow its demise, globalism will lead to the demise of this once great land, God help us.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:55pmJon Stewart is just mad because he can’t get the media to pay him any attention either.
Please listen to Nancy Reagan… When it comes to Ron Paul “Just say NO”.
http://www.AllenWestforPresident.us
Report Post »David Mogrovejo-Araque
Posted on August 22, 2011 at 10:38pmAnd what is so wrong with Ron Paul Rational man I would love to hear your thoughts. Retired old guy I do know that Jon STewart is more liberal minded but he has said that Ron Paul is the best choice for the Presidency that wasn’t word for word but he always praises him. Colbert did do a spoof on Paul which I found disheartening. But Stewart doesn‘t want Obama as the next prez in fact I’m sure he wants Ron Paul to win but he just can’t say that. After the Ron Paul spoof I don’t care what Colbert believes
Report Post »David Mogrovejo-Araque
Posted on August 22, 2011 at 10:45pmIt’s pretty evident that Ron Paul is being excluded because of his foreign policy views. I don’t think the majority of voting Americans will be able to go for his isolationist views; it shows a fundamental lack of understanding the middle east dynamic and the complex problems around the globe, where the U.S. does have interests; in self preservation, mostly.
I‘m sorry but you’re just plain wrong Ron Paul is the only candidate who‘s actually written a book detailing exactly why we need to stay out of the affairs of foreign countries we may have interests but its morally wrong and actually doesn’t boost our economy ecause we end up spending more in weapons and building bases than we can receive from robbing resources from other countries. We also cripple the world economy by doing so. How would Americans feel if they were the victims for once in their lives???… exactly and its not isolationism when you talk and trade peacefully with other countries its just good economics and friendships. As a veteran I really thought you’d be better than this.
Report Post »boca_chica
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:45amJohnny is smirking again-anything the conservative do “is laffable” by Johnny. Ron Paul is the “hook” for beating on the consrvatives as usual-don’t be fooled-humor is a great tool to belittle.
Report Post »@ Coyote2
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:55amRon Paul is the only chance we have to turn America around and make it a great country again.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:34am@@ Coyote2
Time for crazy old uncle Ron to get up from the kiddie table, take his prepared plate of leftovers and go home. Wipe the gravy off your chin Uncle Ron. See you next holiday Uncle Ron.
Report Post »101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:44am@Coyote2
Report Post »I agree
LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:44am@RATIONALMAN
Go ahead, instead of spewing propaganda against the Good Doctor, debate me right now, and explain to me why Ron Paul is not the person to vote for.
Then I will rebuttal you, and silence your garbage fest forever.
Please, enlighten me on how he is “Uncle Crazy Ron”?
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:53amThe Neo-Cons are afraid he may end their Wars and they might run out of blood to spill… They need some women and children to slaughter in order to validate their Patriotism.. That’s about the extent of it. Ron simply has too much integrity and honor for the average poster on the Blaze.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:08pm@LibertariansUnite
Nope! I don’t debate with Pauline Cultists that have the attention span of a fence post. What’s the use? Just the fact that you falsely accused me of “spewing propaganda against the Good Doctor”, tells me you are just as crazy as old Uncle Ron and your just angry because you have to set at the kiddie table with him every year.
You‘ll just have to satisfy your outrage at folks that don’t agree with you by trolling the others on this thread. You don’t have to, “silence your garbage fest forever”, if I just ignore your goofy butt. I will silence myself. Tell it however you want. I don’t care! I ain’t wasting any more time on Pauline Cult members………………..
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:16pm@RATIONALMAN
If you honestly believe what you say, you can debate it with conviction.
Maybe the “Ron Paul Cultists” are so bent on supporting Ron Paul, because they know he is logically correct on all of the issues he addresses, even the hard ones.
That answer however, is perfect for me, because if someone is unwilling to debate their views they usually fall neatly in one of these subgroups, either:
1) They cannot back their argument up with any facts.
2) They haven’t truly bothered to research anything, and they are aware of that, so they avoid conflict.
3) They are not truly convicted on where they stand, because they are unwilling to commit to their view.
Ill let you choose which group you are in Neo Con.
Report Post »NWalters78
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:51pmRon Paul is being positioned as THE GOP CANDIDATE, so the media can tear him apart. This will be McCain Part II, you twits, and you’re helping him. Anyone Jon Stewart “likes” I would be worried about. They’re trying to pick a dottering old man for the Fall Guy Slot. Dole was 70 and he lost. McCain 72 and he lost. Why? Not just age, but both were squishy. Paul, while not Squishy, has plenty of ‘those damned Jews’ sound bites, and stammering that will doom him.
Colbert and Stewart want a weak so-called conservative, so their master can win.
Good work Paulbots, what a bunch of useful idiots and Quislings you truly are. I bet you voted for Obama to teach us a lesson, right?
Report Post »101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 2:37pm@ NWalters78
Report Post »Ron Paul the best man since George Washington and you’re to blind to see it, Dr Ron is what we need to turn this Country around. I think you missed it when Ron Paul started the Tea Party. Don’t get out much do you? Sad people like you are still being lead around like sheep and will never grasp the concept of thinking for yourself .
AmericanPatriot01
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 7:33pmThats right!! Ron Paul is the REASON there is a TEA party you Twitt (Rational Man) I wanna here you rationalize going to war with IRAN. Sanctions have had very little effect and Iran is not interested in Nuclear weapons the way we think they are. It has been many analists’ viewpoint that the reason they want the material is to make “Dirty Bombs” . We think Big huge explosions! they think conaminated, irradiated DEATH. Just another misconception perpetrated by the media and special interest types. FOR GOD SAKE WAKE UP!! These people do not think like those in western society in any fashion!!!
Ron Paul IS HUMAN! and has his own personal flaws like anyone else. BUT HE IS A PATRIOT and has NOT failed his COUNTRY or his fellow citizens. I like that he is SET IN HIS WAYS, because his ways are firmly rooted in the founders and their plans set forth in the CONSTITUTION!! IT MEANS HE IS NOT CORRUPTABLE by the special interest and their money or power. HIS POWER COMES FROM THE MIILLIONS OF PATRIOTS, the “We The People” types. Anyone that researches this man will find that he will not give in to the progressive/socialist/communist cronies. Can’t say that for the rest of the mask wearing establishment puppets on the stage.
The LEFT and the RIGHT establishments are affraid he will win because he will put an end to the BIG GOV”T FOREVER!!!!! And return this nation to IT”S PEOPLE!!! As it should be and was designed to be!!
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 9:30pm@NWALTERS78
Please post a link to either audio or video of Ron Paul making a “those damned Jews” sound bite. You can‘t because it doesn’t exist. Like so many others who disparage Ron Paul all you can do is lie about him, make ad hominem attacks and call his supporters names. I could reciprocate and call you a useful idiot but that wouldn‘t be accurate because you’re not useful.
Let’s make a deal. If you can post a link that shows Ron Paul making a “those damned Jews” sound bite, I will apologize to you and discontinue my support for Ron Paul. If you can’t – you apologize and do some real research on Ron Paul (I’ll provide good sources) and then I defy you to give REAL reasons for not supporting him.
Report Post »flfshrmn
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:42amMaybe Stewart is finally realizing how slanted and jaded the Libs really are. Maybe he is starting to realize the left is heavily radical Socialist in their direction, and just maybe he has seen the light in that……………………naahhhh!………………..He’s still just a douchebag.
Report Post »biggest_effin_patriot_yo
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:15amMore like, “maybe internet conservatives should actually watch a little Daily Show before just assuming they know what’s said on it.” Come on, people, you look so silly ripping on comedians like Stewart. His commentary on the news is smart and funny and he’ll rip into libs and cons alike. Loosen up for crying out loud.
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 2:17pmApparently you either didn’t watch the clip or you are incapable of processing what is in front of you. Stewart was point out the hypocrisy of FAX NEWS, you know the ones that head the debate and then didn’t bother mentioning that the polls had Ron Paul winning the debate?
Report Post »Malachai
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 1:56amNo matter how many clips you get of Stewart posting a balanced piece about something, you always get some ignorant blazer saying “HERP Maybe Stewart’s finally coming around to see how dumb them thar liburlz are DERP.” They miss the fact that he slams all sides on their nonsense and has been doing so for YEARS.
But yeah, keep watching Fox/Beck, who never, ever lie or give you half truths… *wink wink*
Report Post »PATRIOTMAMA
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:42amI don‘t like Ron’s stance on the military, HOWEVER, since I believe that a gnat would be a better president than the current one. If Ron Paul wins then I will vote for him in a heartbeat!!! Make no mistake he standing strong right now and has a real shot of winning. BUT, if gets the nomination we need to stand together and get OBAMAnation OUT OF OFFICE. Ron Paul believes in his message and Stewart is right, he has been incredibly consistant. Wouldn’t the liberals crap their collective socialsist pants if Ron Paul became our president. That alone is almost worth electing Paul. I’m considering it, HARD!!!
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:40pmFunny, because the Military stands behind him. You don‘t know how many people I’ve met during my service that is a Ron Paul fan, enough so that they put in their hard earned (and I do mean hard earned) dollars back in 2008 towards his campaign and have already done so this time around. I was deployed during the 2008 elections, and you’d be surprised how many of us in my company alone that supported him. Not everyone is a neo-con, even if they are in the military.
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:59pm@AMERICANSOLDIER
It is funny to me how many of these “Patriotic Americans” on this forum are for “supporting the military” by sending them to die, to fight pointless wars.
If you want to really support your military, bring the Troops home.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:14pmThe liberal LEFT and the establishment RIGHT are both SCARED as he!! that Ron Paul would win Because both of their progressive agenda driven programs would be put under the AXE.Thats why they try to minimalize him and make fun of him? Didnt they call Einstien CRAZY!!! Newton was an excentric mental case? and so many others that were bashed and demoralized before being publicly exhaulted as Genius!! When they were proven to be right! Even Prof. Hubble spent amost of his career ostrisized for his beliefs and scientific theories until they were proven correct.
So whats new? Ron Paul has the PEOPLE behind him, not some huge multinational finance team, not some corperate mogul and definately not some communist/socialist global machine, It’s US, the people, the PATRIOTS, that hold this man up because he stands for freedom, truth and the AMERICAN WAY!!! He may be old but we respect our elders and their WISDOM, at least where I come from.
Report Post »Tyr
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:55pmLibertariansUnite
Report Post »Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:59pm
10 years we have been fighting this “war” on terrorism and we are no closer to winning today than we were in 2001. It took us four years to defeat the Nazis AND the Japanese. You want to know why? Because we were prepared to kill every German and Japanese on the face of the planet Earth if that what it took to win. These politicians don’t want to win this war on terror. And those of you that support sending America’s youth to die for this cause are lying to yourselves and are sending them to a futile death. You all just keep calling them heros if it makes you feel better. They are in fact brave and selfless men and women, but the hero term is one that you give them to justify sending them to be murdered in a war that “we the people” won’t allow them win. Either let them win by allowing them to start killing Muslims wholesale until the enemy loses the will to fight back or don’t have enough people to muster for battle and surrender, Allow them to utterly destroy the infrastructure of the Arab nations that support terror by bombiing them day and night for months on end until the common people on the street sue for peace. If you won’t do these things and let them win, then do the right thing and bring our troops home!
Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:42amIf anyone questions that the media is controlled by NWO globalists, this helps illustrates it! Ron Paul is an enemy to the self-anointed elitist ruling class and therefore the real choice to fight the Statists! It is obvious!
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:02amWell said
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:41pmB 4 Libertarians Were Cool
That’s funny……..When did that happen?
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:49pm@RATIONALMAN
That’s funny, when did your comments contain actual substance?
Report Post »101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:24pmRon Paul Rocks…America could not pick a better man for president!
Report Post »johnconnersmom
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:51pmAmen!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 3:04pmLibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:49pm
@RATIONALMAN
That’s funny, when did your comments contain actual substance?
Where Paul and his cultist followers are concerned? Not long ago when I relegated the Pauline Cult to the catagory of errational, delusional, humorous, not to be taken seriously anymore. Trying to talk substance with you guys is just an effort in futillity. You have reduced yourselves to being a joke. Fun to toy with sometimes. Beating your chest and disparaging anyone who disagrees with you. Go practice your rant in front of a mirror or something……….
Report Post »Or, call me names and make some more false acusations. Your so progressive in that way of communication………………
Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 3:47pm“Rational Man”… You’re neither!
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:30pm@ rational man
You remind me of keith oberman, the “I’m so much smarter than you little people” attitude. you don’t debate at all, you mandate with absolutes. You have no position here or hold any authority on any topic here. I don’t call names, I only call out the frauds like you and dispute your self dignified statemants. One day you will wake up as well, and see the light of truth. Until then, in my book you are nothing more than another TROLL that should be starved of attention.
I did try to debate you on a few issues. rather than debate me you just dismissed my research and opinion as uninelligent zombie babble?? I have yet to see you offer any solution, much less any real research or fact to back up anything you banter about. Oh I forgot, your’e smarter than us little people. I got news for you, WE AIN’T SO LITTLE ANYMORE!!!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:40amWow. That was actually a pretty darn good clip. I’m surprised, even though I‘m tired of The Blaze’s obsession with Stewart, it seems like they’ve been pretty aligned with his views so far.
I’m also surprised Ron Paul did so well in the straw polls. I really heard nothing of him, like most writing him off as too out of touch with most of the GOP. But really, his views are the exact embodiment of what the Tea Party claims to be: small government, local government, and hands off the affairs of the citizens.
I hope he keeps getting more popular. I would take him over Bachmann any day.
Report Post »jackeric61
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:24amWhen are Americans going to understand that our founders said any “party” be it 2,3 or 10 will destroy our libery for their own gains. Ron Paul may be in the repub party but his views are not anywhere as center as most republicans. Can’t everyone see dems and repubs are alike and just say what the people want to hear. Go back to GWB campaign speeches as well as BHO and hear all the lies. We have very short memories don’t we. Ron Paul will save our freedoms and liberties and fight the battles here at home, ending the wars and restoring America. Our gov’t just keeps asking for more of our HARD EARNED $ and we keep giving to them. I keep wondering who the fools really are?
Report Post »Malachai
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 2:01amYou’ve not heard of him for the exact reasons Stewart states; the media (Fox in particular) are purposefully ignoring him. They don’t WANT you to hear about him. Why do you think Fox was pushing Herman Cain so hard one on, including that fake Luntz “focus group” they had after the first debate? They were just diverting attention from Paul until they got who they really wanted up front. Now that they have those people (Bachmann, Perry, etc., ) they can go back to ignoring Paul and Cain (though Cain sucks anyway so that’s fine.)
Go read up/YouTube up on Ron Paul. There is a good reason he has a strong following.
Report Post »freeweever
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:39amHe knows without Ron Paul running against obama with a republican running also his man obama will lose. This tiny little ***** “jon steward” is a divisive manipulator and his Napolean small mans’ disease is so obvious and treasonous. He says he is not partizan lol lol lol thats the only funny thing I have heard him say in years. These guys are nazi’s
Report Post »LiberalMarine
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:43amHe has always admitted to a liberal bias.
Report Post »Malachai
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 2:05amStep one: Remove head from rectum.
There, much better.
If you actually listened to the Daily Show instead of bleating along to Fox every day you’d realize that while he personally has a liberal bias, they bash both sides equally.
FYI, if Bachmann goes against Obama, she will lose. Guaranteed. While Obama isn’t great, an extremist like her (and don’t kid yourself; she is an extremist) will NOT get voted for by the people that matter; Independents and Democrats unhappy with Obama. She’s Palin 2.0; no one outside of her own party likes her, unlike, say, Ron Paul, who has a wide following across all parties.
Report Post »CorpsmanToPA
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:39amI am completely fed up with this establishment that everyone seems to to not realize that Rush, Hannity, and all those I used to trust at Faux and such, are all part of the same stupid game we keep falling for. Cut the crap and lets change back with the original guy who has never changed – Ron Paul! It is so obvious and if you guys want to keep the status quo of getting a few moral steps forward then 10 back, go for it you schmucks. I for one am finished with it!
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 5:51pmYes. I have just recently realized they are Neo-Cons. The global elite hand-pick individuals that they would like to represent them in government. They then have an endless supply of money they have stolen from you with their military Industrial complex, to finance their campaigns all the way to the top if they can get the spot. This is why nothing changes, regardless of whether the democrats or republicans dominate the house, senate and oval office. Roughly 95% of all Republicans are global progressives, posing as “conservatives” and even have to gall to claim to be TEA party !!! The undeniable proof of ALL MSM outlets, including this one, manipulating the truth to carry out an agenda should be a RED WARNING FLAG !!!!
Report Post »LiberalMarine
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:38amHow many times do you people have to say “Well he is right this one time” before it turns into “You know, he may have a liberal bias but he holds both sides accountable and at least that is commendable.”
Report Post »DallyWama
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:46amSuacy anecdote to be sure. Most Blaze posters would never say he presents both sides. You are thinking of O’reilly.
Screen shot or it didnt happen
WTF
Report Post »The Voice of Libertarian Reason
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:47amI don‘t care much for Jon’s ideologies, but he does call out both sides on their bullsh*t.
Report Post »LizB
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:53amGood for you. I’m a conservative-leaning independent, and I absolutely love Stewart. Just for that reason … he calls whoever out, no matter what side of the isle they are on! Plus, he’s funny as hell!
Report Post »survivorseed
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 7:05amIts a sad state when a comedian is the most trusted man in news
Report Post »Khedewia
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:33amIt just goes to show you how the media directs even the selection of a candidate. I have to give Jon Stewart credit on this one. He is not taking sides and recognizes that Ron Paul is being treated unfairly, even if he doesn’t like him.
Report Post »pscully17
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:41amIm Ripping the media for NOT ignoring you Jon Liebewicz… Go away. Ron Paul is a wing-nut!! The end.
Report Post »DallyWama
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:43amRiiiiiight. No. Paul is unelectable. He has no charisma, no presidential hair, and will be doing laps in a wheel chair before long. This is what the MSM wants, that is, to distract and deter the judgement of conservative voters. He could care less about Ron Paul.
2008: The media got the leper gnome (McCain) elected and he looked terrible against the youthful exuberance of Obama
2012: The media wants another old man to run against the now grey haired but still younger looking Obama.
Are you really going to believe an MSM figure that resembles an erect phallic object?
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:48amWing-nut? Nice ad hominem attack. Is that’s all you war-mongering Neo-cons have?
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:23amMAN!!….I sure hope people hurry up and get used to the term neo-con and stop using it all the time like it’s the new word they just learned in kindergarten today……………………
Report Post »(doesn’t make you sound smarter)
Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:30amAfraid the term “Neo-con” clearly delineates a kind of war-mongering, NWO, right-wing ideology… Sorry to offend your sensibilities, but the application was apt. Maybe you’d be more comfortable playing among the cry-baby lefties? You sure sound like one!
Report Post »101
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:58amRon Paul is electable and would step all over the establishment, they‘re scared of a true honest man that will destroy their game that’s why they censor Dr Paul out…you people that say “unelectable” are just being herded like sheep, no spine, no guts, no glory!
Report Post »american1st
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 12:29pm101 no kidding…. i guess “question boldly” really meant “question boldly unless we tag the guy with a few labels and misinformed MSM talking point’s” then follow like you have a ring in you nose….
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 9:33pmneo-con makes one sound stupid.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:42pm@circledwagons
Writing or saying “neo-con” may make one stupid (in your opinion) but being a neo-con (and probably not even realizing it) is truly stupid. Trust me I used to be one and I know for a fact – it was stupid.
Report Post »sambachico
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 1:09amLOL @ COUS – I too was a neocon.
There is one other term we haven’t talked about much yet- Tea-o-con. Supposed tea-partiers who love small government except when it comes to expanding the military budget/complex and expanding the war state who still believe George W. Bush was a great President on foreign policy. Bachmann is a prime example of a tea-o-con, who disagrees w/ the Libyan war but hangs onto the notion that somehow we did this great thing in Iraq and Afghanistan, and we don’t know when to leave because John McCain said it might take a 95 year occupation to win the war. (Sarcasm)
That’s truly the division within the tea-party, tea-o-con Republicans and Constitutional anti-war Republicans. We both agree on the majority of the economic issues, and even most conservatives I speak with these days are done w/ imprisoning people for drug infractions. Hell, even brother Pat Robertson wants to end the drug war as it’s counterproductive. I don’t find it surprizing that those who mimic the words of The Doctor of Democracy and the Levin constitutional comedy hour love to ridicule Paul for his beliefs, when the man has more moral integrity in his personal life, marriage and treatment of others than all the talk radio clowns combined. Dr. Paul continues to show his quality, and I can’t say that for the remainder of them, with the exception of Hannity who comes around once in a while.
Report Post »AlansTigg
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:31amthat was really funny
Report Post »an irishgal
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:31amokay…so Steward has a good thought …for the first time. Ron Paul is a great messenger…He certainly knows the US Constitution…and he knows Finance. All of us should be listening and learning from Ron. Ron Paul bring it one the Rhinos running will fall by the wayside. LOVE IT> Thanks Stewart for the first time.
Report Post »FORLORNHOPE
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:27amNoticed that fox news in now part of the MSM blather same same.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:40pmYea, now that Glenn Beck is not on their programming. They really seem to have lost their luster., and their sense of fairness. I can’t wait for GBTV to start up.
Report Post »GOA_AMD65
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:27amGreat job Jon Stewart!
Report Post »ares338
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:27amFor umptheenth time……..who cares what he thinks about anything. He is (and I use this term loosely) an entertainer. He has no special insights into politics except for it’s value to garner laughs.
Report Post »JUSTANOTHEROPINION
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:26amRon Paul is dolusional.To actually beleive Iran getting nuclear weapons is no big deal is nuts, but, of coarse this guy is a Liberal. Need I say more? I think not.
Report Post »KPEdwards
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:35amWHAT? Listen, I know you might not agree with Paul on everything, but he is not a liberal. Not everything you disagree with is liberal.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:38amHe’s a libertarian. Completely different than a liberal.
Report Post »Servant Of YHVH
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:45amAnyone that thinks Ron Paul is a liberal probably also thinks that obama is his personal messiah. I have seen (and posted) just about everything that there is to see and the OPINION that Ron Paul is a liberal is the stupidest one I have ever seen on here. And that goes for what the liberal wacko trolls on here are saying as well. Carter is glad that he no longer is the worst president and I wonder if the liberal wacko trolls are glad that they do not have the stupidest post on The Blaze any more.
Report Post »Misdirection
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:47amRon Paul is the only candidate who is talking about giving more of our freedoms back! You should listen to him.
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:49amIran is just tired of bringing a knife to a gun fight. Let them have the nuke, we can then clean house and stop this stuff. It’s kinda like the ref at a hockey game,stopping a player from fighting(if he were to let him fight the player would get his clock cleaned). It’s time(pun) to clean their clock!
Report Post »GOA_AMD65
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:58amRon Paul is not a Liberal. He is not former IRS agent. He is not a supporter of RomneyCare. He is not a former supporter of Al Gore.
Vote for Liberty, Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »johnconnersmom
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:25amI don’t care who you are that is funny! Perhaps Mr. Stewart is finally learning that it is all in the fix!
Report Post »Unfortunately, I believe that Ron Paul is Ross Perot all over again….
teddrunk
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:36amHeh,heh,heh,heh,heh….that’s world class…Johnconnorsmom (In a Ross Perot voice)
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 8:34pmYes, and Ross warned us about NAFTA, a global agenda. Too bad he wasn’t “electable”. He might have saved us a long time ago.
Report Post »notavictim
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:24amUnbelievable!
Report Post »MODEL82A1
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:24amWhen a comedian is one of your party’s most recognized spokesmen, that’s all anyone really needs to know about your party.
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:54am@MODEL82A1–Al Franken.
Report Post »an irishgal
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:23amOkay…this is the first for Stewart…Ron Paul is the messenger…I will vote for him.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:23amSteward knows Paul doesn’t stand chance of getting elelcted if he was nominated. He just being the usual partisan doucheb*g as always. Mudding the waters won’t help Obama beat candidate NOT OBAMA.
Report Post »As for Paul I mean no disrespect his views on economic and small government are great I think which ever NOT OBAMA that wins in 2012 should ask or even beg him to become the secretary of treasury Giving paul the chance to open the book on the reserve exposing all the fraud and establishing real chance in our economic system.
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:45amI agree with you there. Whoever gets elected President, make Dr. Paul the Secretary of the Treasury.
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:11amPaul scores better then any other GOP’s vs Obama.
Report Post »If establishment is agance him im for him.
LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 11:50amLook I know your only source of information is the propaganda box, but let me break this down for you.
Ron Paul is the one who scores highest among Independants and Liberals against Obama.
So to argue that he “can’t beat Obama” and imply that someone so fake as Romney can, is absolutely disgusting.
Look I know your lazy, and you want your information force fed to you from FOX so you do not have to actually think about anything, but I encourage you to research a topic before you comment on it.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:11pmLook LUNITE,
Report Post »I know Paul is your dream candidate but face facts the man doesn’t appears Presidential. I have all the respect in the world for DR. Paul I believe him to be a sincere man that bases all his decisions on the Constitution. Which generally speaking is great how ever in these times somethings have to are beyond anything our forefathers could see. I believe we need to stop policing the world just like Ron I however don‘t believe that country’s ruled by chaos or whose leaders want to bring about armagadon should have the right to nuclear weapon. Ron’s views on that and that alone is enough to lose him the election. He’[ll never be president and with a pollyanna view of other nations he shouldn’t be. I do think in the position of Treasury Dr. Paul could do more to save this nations economy than he could as President. He could have his named etched in history as the man that turned the tide set forth by our truely worst president in history WILSON
HotBreakingStory
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:23amIgnore him all they want for now. It’s less pressure. I think Paul is the only one who can restore our democracy if it’s even possible anymore.
This is the real story that the media is not and cannot report on. Here’s what Obama, Osama, Biden, Bin Laden, the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists, and Sarah Palin had to do with the last election and the military’s overthrow of our government.
http://alturl.com/yxioe
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:41amWe’re a Republic not a democracy
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:22amRon Paul will never be President. His views on foreign policy are just way to soft. He thinks its ok for Iran to seek out a nuclear bomb? He obviously doesnt understand what a true threat Iran actually is.
Report Post »BlazingInSC
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:48am@JLGunner – remind me again – which nation is the only nation in the history of the world to ever use nuclear weapons against another sovereign nation? There are plenty of nuclear armed nations out there that do not like the U.S. – China, Pakistan,N. Korea. The threat from nuclear weapons is the deterrent – not the actual use of them.
Report Post »King_Rum
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:47pmSo we should invest time, effort, and finances on Iran but what about the other nations that have nukes? How about for once we start fixing our own house of cards, then worry about who possibly, in some future time try to blow it down.
Report Post »King_Rum
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 1:51pmAll the man is saying let‘s get out of other people’s business and start taking care of our own country.
Report Post »Hefsmaster
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 3:00pmExtremists subvert nations, take over a nations foreign policy and then send their armies out to murder foreigners under the guise of security.
Report Post »Notice all of the tiny countries that are not afraid of Iran? Notice how only a few felt so threatened by Iraq, thousands of miles away that they had to send an army to make them feel secure.
When you do extreme things like murdering foreigners in their homelands from thousands of miles away, that makes you an extremist, because you go to the most extreme act there is.
Murder.
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:21amMaybe for one time Steward was trying to do both sides of the equation; jab at the media for not mentioning of Ron Paul, and trying to be a distraction all at once.
Report Post »eat-more-bacon-USA
Posted on August 16, 2011 at 10:18amJon who? Ron who?
Report Post »101
Posted on August 17, 2011 at 12:55amPlease pledge to donate to the Ron Paul Birthday Money Bomb at http://www.RonPaul2012.com on August 20th.
Report Post »