Jon Stewart Skewers Cain in Brutal Segment Over Affair Allegations
- Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:22am by
Buck Sexton
- Print »
- Email »
Jon Stewart and his “Daily Show” correspondents really tore into Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain’s most recent alleged sexual impropriety on Tuesday night.
Simply put, in the battle of public perception, there wasn‘t much left of Cain’s forces after the “Daily Show” crew was through.
On Ginger White’s allegations that she had a 13-year-long affair with Cain, Stewart said to this audience:
“Thirteen years? That is an admirable commitment to the women with whom you are… violating your spousal commitment.”
Stewart also sarcastically noted it was ”Nice to see him going the consensual route,” referring to earlier allegations of sexual harassment and assault against Cain.
Stewart also honed in on the allegation that Cain signed a book for White with the inscription that “friends are forever, everything else is a bonus.”
Cain’s excuse for that signature — that he was “trying to help White financially” — was laughed out of the studio by Stewart and his studio audience.
Watch the no-punches-pulled Daily Show segment yourself and take a guess at how many days the Cain campaign has left [warning: some adult content in the segment]:




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (90)
motonutt
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:24pmJohney Stewart a pathetic little joke of a man…..You want to talk about infedelity and affairs, where is your piece on obamas male lovers?
Report Post »gezbo48
Posted on December 1, 2011 at 10:06pmWhere is your evidence?
Report Post »blackstone22
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:24pmFunny stuff by Jon Stewart.
Report Post »Cain will not be able to weather this storm.
HippoNips
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 2:43pmJust your Romney supporting opinion
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 6:28pmCome on, cut him slack. I’m sure Cain was calling her at 4:23a.m. to tell her that if she needed money it was her fault. That kind of news just can’t wait.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:12pmSadly, he doesn’t have to look very far for his material.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:11pmOk, I’m no Cain supporter, (being a “Paulie”) but has anyone noticed that Beck and the Blaze has become totally slanted against anyone who ISN”T Bachman?
Report Post »truthisbrawn05
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 3:29pmI definately have. And yet he knows she has no chance of winning. Hmmm? Maybe he’s just playing it safe.
Report Post »LibertarianGuy
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 4:38pmYup, I’ve noticed the same thing also. I like you am a Paul supporter. The only things they cover on him are insanely negatively slanted. Why not cover on the utterly brilliant things the guy says for a change? It’d be nice.
Report Post »Welfare-Warfare State
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:02pmSomeone mentioned Jon Hunstman as the real conservative? Ha! Where are the cuts? Where are the proposals to eliminate unconsitutional departments?
What about our unconstitutional monetary system? He hasn’t even brushed the subject.
While he isn’t as insane as Gingrich/Romney/Bachmann/InSanetorum, he still has a Wilsonian/establishment foreign policy.
The only one who will radically change D.C. in Ron Paul. Look at the man’s voting record. His rhetoric matches his votes. He hasn’t flip-flopped. He is sound.
Can the same be said for Gingrich and Romney?
Huntsman won’t change foreign policy, the monetary system, the tax code, spending, unconstitutional departments. etc. He’s an establishment drone.
Ron Paul 2012 :)
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:18pmoh I think calling Huntsman an “establishment drone” is giving him WAAAAY too much credit.
…..and yes, Ron Paul is the only option.
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:01pmThere is no evidence that Herman Cain ever touched any of these National Restaurant Association, Democrat, golddigging… “women”, for lack of a better word.
If you‘re buying it then don’t vote at all; you’re not smart enough.
Romney is already the Candidate and he’s already lost the Election. Prepare.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 4:15pmThanks to those pesky progressives, women are now allowed to vote in every state in the country, so the defense that nobody has met the burden of proof necessary to prove in a court of law that all six of Mr. Cain’s accusers are not just lying is not going to win any elections for him.
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 4:46pmSo, women voters are the problem?
Hmmmm…
I kinda thought that American voters were the problem; being too stupid to see a simple political setup. The old, “If you believe everything you read, best not to read.” thing…
But, if you insist it‘s the ladies that just aren’t smart enough, maybe I should reassess my opinion.
Or not.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on December 1, 2011 at 1:08amI didn’t say that women were a problem or that they weren’t smart, because I don’t myself buy the theory that Cain is an innocent victim of a smear campaign.
Report Post »Welfare-Warfare State
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:57pmNot to worry Cainheads, statist Gingrich will save you all. They have so much in common.
Let’s see, they both supported TARP and Keynesian stimulus under Bush, then Obama.
They both think the Fed. Reserve can centrally plan interest rates and the economy to good effect.
They both ignore the Constitution on monetary matters.
They both refuse to propose any real cuts. Gingrich called Paul Ryan’s milquetoast plan “right-wing social engineering” because it cut from a baseline of projected increases. Imagine what Gingrich must think of Dr. Paul’s plan to cut 5 unconstitutional dept.’s and $1 trillion in real cuts in 1st year.
Both support UnPatriotic Act.
Both support a left-wing Wilsonian foreign policy of nation-building, propping up puppet dictators of the U.S. governnment, “making the world safe for democracy,” etc.
Newt voted for D. of Education in 1978.
Newt ran as Rockefeller Republican first two times in Georgia. After no success, statist Newt tacked to the right rhetorically. He’s always been globalist Newt behind the concealing rhetoric though.
Newt support ethanol subsidies and was paid $1.6 million to lobby for Freddie Mac.
Newt didn’t see housing crash coming. Paul predicted it years in advance.
Ron Paul predicted the disaster that was Iraq. Dr. Paul advocated bringing back Letters of Marquee and Reprisal to go after Al-Qaeda. That would have meant small tactical units. That’s how Bin Laden was caught. Paul was right again.
Report Post »teebubba
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:33pmWell it certainly explains why no one has had a harassment complaint in the last decade. Quite frankly I prefer my decision makers to believe they are still studs even though unfortunately the institution of marriage does not always provide this for them.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:23pmI’d save the word “brutal” to describe the emotional mistreatment of his wife if these allegations are true.
Report Post »Red Meat
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:31pmI‘m surprised there’s no Allen West tells Cain to GTFO thread here at Blaze. It could be a double butt hurt day for the Blazers if they would only post relevant news.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:45pm@redmeat….you said…
“I‘m surprised there’s no Allen West tells Cain to GTFO thread here at Blaze. It could be a double butt hurt day for the Blazers if they would only post relevant news.”
Butt hurt? What are you? 12? Go hang out at the Huffington Post where they can validate your sniveling and whining. No one has any sympathy for your idiocy here.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:23pmPolitical correctness is being played here… they are not posting factual criticisms.
Report Post »StopWhiningAlready
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:15pmGood grief…would the Ron Paul supporters just stop already. It’s really getting tiresome. As wonderful as his take on fiscal and tax reform might be, his foreign policy stance means that he will never – EVER – be elected president. Sorry, but that’s just the way it is. Why not a good cabinet post where he can take on the most egregious issues and leave it at that?
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:33pm“his foreign policy stance ”
That’s why he has received more donations from the military than ALL of the other “R” candidates COMBINED. Even more than Ohmamma. (that is a FACT) Look it up.
If his foreign policy stance is so “crazy” then why does the military give him so much support?
People flap their gums about “support the troops” yada yada yada, but then when the troops speak with their hard earned donations, they are totally ignored.
Report Post »I think the men and women in uniform know a little more about foreign policy than the average chickenhawk that seems all too willing to send OTHER people into battle, before they’d strap on a rifle themselves.
Iran is NOT a threat. Never have been, and never will be. Pakistan is more of a threat than Iran could ever be, and they have nukes galore.
The only place Iran could do harm is to our troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, and in the Persian Gulf.
If Israel attacks them, then they will be putting our troops in harm’s way for their own selfish interests. Not to mention they will be starting WWIII.
WWIII is what the globalists want. They want to bring down the system, and create “order out of chaos.“ In other words a ”New World Order”
If you do not understand that concept, then you might want to do a little more study.
Sorry to get off topic, but some folks need a reality check.
Br@dley
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:48pmfunny, i love criticisms of ron paul supporters. they’re all so asinine.
i actually saw one of you blaze nerds claim that cain’s presidency was ordained by god. who are the crazy ones again?
Report Post »Fella
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 2:27pmHaha! So very true. You will almost never see a reasoned, thoughtful post by the Paul detractors. The best they can come up with is parroting whatever Rush, Hannity, Beck, etc hammer into their soft shelled heads every day. Which usually amounts to “he’s kooky”. Although, some are getting creative. The best I have seen is that Paul is secretly working for the Russians. Lol
Report Post »ares338
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:13pmHere is my usual response to Stewart. WHO CARES? Thank you!
Report Post »tobywil2
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:13pmTHE 2011 LYNCHING CONTINUES http://commonsense21c.com/CAIN.html
The Obama media continues to make unproven allegations of personal improprieties committed by Mr. Cain. The premise behind these allegations is that Mr. Cain is unfit to be President because he may have some personal defects unrelated to his ability to save our Republic and put in the end to the Cronyism Economic System.
During this time the Obama media has completely ignored the scams committed by the Obama administration funding the so-called “green energy industry.” Of course, there’s nothing unproven about the “green energy industry” swindle. The only thing unproven is exactly who is responsible and how much of the proceeds will ultimately end up in Mr. Obama’s campaign fund. Which is the most important; the Obama administration stealing $1 billion or allegations about Mr. Cain’s personal sex life?
Of course the Obama media doesn’t mention the premise behind these allegations against Mr. Cain, because the premise totally illogical. Even the allegations pale in comparison to the actions of recent presidents while in office.
The Obama media is certainly capable of making these unproven allegations about any of the candidates. Ask yourself, why the Obama media is so afraid of Mr. Cain?
Report Post »http://commonsense21c.com/
Free2speakRN
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 2:19pmSomething Is Rotten in the State of Denmark.
Have not heard anything about or from the other women since this troubled soul reared her ugly head. You‘d think they’d be in the background yelling, “Yeah, Yeah!”
As soon as Cain goes, and that is ‘if’ he goes, the ‘RaceCard’ will return upon us. First of all, I’m not convinced of the allegations. 2ndly, The timing and the content, too convienient. 3rdly, Is this administration capable of this type of orchestration?
Something Is Rotten in the State of Denmark.
Report Post »Obama can win this election…….they’ll do alot more than this to win.
Stoic one
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:02pm(chuckle)!!!!
Report Post »GeneTracy
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:00pmO.K. With a staff of more than a dozen writers on “The Daily Show”,this is the best Jon Stewart could come up with?
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:53amI thought attacks like this on a black man were racist, hate, dangerous speech? Only the left gets away with their BS!
Report Post »oto1
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:09pmCessna-
What part of Stewart’s piece was “racist, hate, dangerous speech”??? It’s not like a manufactured scandal about a black man was suppoedly really born in Africa or something like that!
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:09pmThe facts are the facts, just because Cain is black doesn’t make stating the facts racist. Maybe you need to look up the definition.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:15pmNothing was… but anytime I opposed BHO’s “ideals” and flaws, I was labeled a “racist hater”. Yes, hard to believe….
Report Post »mrqstixx
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:27pm@ 0t01 & simpletruths
Report Post »That’s the point. It wasn’t racist. But if you even criticize Obama’s policies your branded a racist.
smithclar3nc3
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:46pmsimpletruths,
Report Post »what fact are there? Please show me one fact involving Cain and these sexual allegations. Fact is the only fact that exist is the alligations themselves. There’s nothing provable about any on them.
THINK DUKE LA’CROS TEAM
There’s you FACT.
And here‘s one more fact the DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT OBAMA TO RUN AGAINST A BLACK MAN. A real black man born into poverty raised by a poor black mother and a black father that worked three jobs to keep him family safe. Not a half black bastard child of a black anti-american Kenyan marxist and a white anti american marxist atheist. Raised in Hawaii. Who sought out Communist,socialist,marxist,and radicals because he identified with them.they don’t want Obama to face a real 100% no doubt about it self made black man. Fact is Obama doesn’t deserve to sit in the same room as a real black American like Herman Cain much less claim he is a black american.
Jefferson
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:53amPeople seem quick to blame “the left” for these accusations, but Cain originally blamed the Perry campaign. What is a married man doing texting other women, in the wee hours of the morning and night? That‘s a fair question isn’t it?
Report Post »If you are starting to concede that you have possibly been wrong about believing Herman Cain, could you also concede that you might also be wrong about Ron Paul?
How many phony conservative wolves in sheep’s clothing are you going to cycle through, before you realize that the one true and honest candidate has been there all along?
People seem to want to cut off their noses to spite their face.
tifosa
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:02pm“How many phony conservative wolves in sheep’s clothing are you going to cycle through, before you realize that the one true and honest candidate has been there all along?”
Report Post »Jon. Huntsman.
Locked
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:04pm“People seem quick to blame “the left” for these accusations, but Cain originally blamed the Perry campaign.”
Eh, politicians will undercut each other wherever and however they can. The Obama birther conspiracy began with a Hillary campaign staffer looking to undercut his support and make him look like an outsider. It didn’t gain much traction with the left, but the GOP ran with it for all it was worth.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:19pmSo, nobody’s going to take a stab at the question?
What is a married man doing texting other women in the wee hours of the night?
Report Post »That doesn’t seem odd to anyone?
Anyone?
Bueller?
Bueller?
Anyone?
BTW, “Jon Huntsman” is Henry Kissinger’s boy. Yes, he is ALSO a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
lylejk
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:48amIf Mr. Cain’s so low down in the polls, then why does the left and the “establishment” continue to attack him? What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. It won’t work John. Why does it matter about Mr. Cain’s personal life to your decrepit audience anyway (heck, 90% of them probably now would vote for him if they believe these allegations). ‘Nough said. :)
Report Post »I Love Freedom
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 7:59pmWho benefits? Newt the progressive thats who.
Report Post »Mukichan
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:46amNow we (conservatives ) Have to remember this Guy is the MOST Watched Democrat News Corespondent right now. Stop laughing I know he is not a news man But The Leftists Don’t (hes not sure either) They adore and respect his views as Liberal Dogma. Chris Mathews can’t carry his jock strap..
Report Post »SAM1234
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:20pmHe’s not a news correspondent. He’s on Comedy Central. He makes jokes. Don’t take him too seriously. Meanwhile, keep watching GBTV. There’s real news and journalism. Also, learn to write in sentences.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:46amIf Herman Cain at least we know he’s not Gay…. Thats more than i can say for Obama…
Report Post »OhForGodsSake
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:48amThat’s the most idiotic thing anyone has ever heard.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:00pmHe is from Detroit, ya know where that other government motors company is (chrysler), be gentle…….
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 2:40pmIt’s official!!
Cain is not gay. He has my vote
Now who is Larry Sinclari?
Report Post »Ironmaan
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:46amNothing like treating an accusatioin that has yet to be proven true. Stewart is a dope and I hope one day he receives the same treatment. Here is a story that could very well effect everyone but I hear nothing about it. http://guerillatics.com/?p=39473
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:57amhttp://www.theblaze.com/stories/pandemic-possible-scientist-genetically-modifies-bird-flu-with-scary-results/
the link for the story (a day or two ago) you mentioned.
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:45amSeems like the left have taken the ball and run with it once again (doens’t matter that this smear stinks almost as bad the Alred/Axlerod curve ball cooked up weeks earlier)….I really wish someone would release Obumblers education transcripts. I bet the hot air in the liberal “balloon” that proclaims this POTUS is a genius would fizzle out pretty quickly. I suppose to expect such transparency from the “most transparent administration in history” is a bridge too far ? Apparently it is.
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:42amjohn stewart is an angry little man who uses humor to sway the uninformed dope smoking masses.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:34amDoes Jon go after both the right AND THE LEFT ? I do not have tv service so I do not know; if he does then fine…….
Report Post »jasmer
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:46amNot to any serious degree. When it happens on rare (unavoidable) location, the ‘humor’ is mild.
Do yourself a favor, and don’t bother with The Daily Show. RedEye is superior in every way, and they don’t rely on hack writers for their material.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:49amThank you… never heard of this guy until he was emblazoned here on the Blaze.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 12:18pmJust a few that were also skewered by Stewart for sex scandals include John Edwards, Anthony Weiner, Eliot Spitzer.
Report Post »swamp_donkey
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 2:44pmstewart was just as brutal with anthony weiner
Report Post »marklross
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 11:30amI found an interview Jon Stupid did with Bill Clinton, but couldn’t find a video of him lambasting Slick Willy for his numerous extra-marital affairs….hmmm….
Report Post »Bruce Edmund
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:00pmMarkLRoss is right. Stewart could do an entire season on Clinton’s extra-marital relationships. I’m sure this was simply a mental lapse. Yea, right!
Report Post »SAM1234
Posted on November 30, 2011 at 1:24pmHe does make Clinton jokes occasionally. Unfortunately that stuff is like 13 years old. Scandals older than a decade don’t make for the best comedy. Get over it.
Report Post »