Kindergartener Brings Mother’s Crack Pipe & $3,700 in Drugs to Show-and-Tell
- Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:29pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
For most children, show-and-tell is a time when fun or intriguing personal items can be shared with peers. But when a kindergarten student brought his mom’s crack pipe and some drugs to his Sweet Springs, Missouri, elementary school, officials’ mouths dropped.
KCTV5 reports that the boy shocked his classroom audience when he showed the items on Sept. 6 at Sweet Springs Elementary School. Following the incident, school officials called police. Court records indicate that the teacher told police that the boy had the pipe and “several baggies of crack rocks.” Officials say the drugs, later identified as methamphetamine, were worth about $3,700.
As a result, the child’s mother, 32-year-old Michelle Marie Cheatham, was charged with possession of a controlled substance. Additionally, she was charged with one count of first-degree child endangerment.
Police Chief Richard Downing told KCTV5 that this was the first time in his career that a child has brought drugs in for show and tell. He explained:
“When I called the prosecutor about it, they said, ‘You’re kidding me, aren’t you?’”
A family friend told KCTV5 that the boy is being cared for by relatives. At least one person who knows the investigation well has said that Cheatham’s life began unraveling after her husband died earlier this year in a car crash.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (138)
Ron Paul is a NUT
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:13pmDoesn’t Ron Paul want to legalize or de-criminalize drugs?
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:25pmI’d like to take this opportunity to welcome you to the forum!
Report Post »Make yourself right at home!
Ron Paul is a NUT
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:34pmThank you, Rational Man.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:35pmYep he sure does, then it would only cost $37 instead of $3700.
Report Post »meamerican
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:44pm@Ron Paul is (not) a Nut & Irrational Man – Does that mean if these drugs WERE to be made legal you would start doing them? His point is that the people who want to do them will do them anyway so why not regulate it?
Should we assume that you both chain smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol like a fish being they are both legal?
I heard that a kid fell on a pencil and was hurt, we should ban them!
Report Post »Ron Paul is a NUT
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:51pm@MeAmerican…
So, you agree with Ron Paul that it’s our fault the Jihadis attacked us on 9-11?
Report Post »Teaparty-grammy
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:56pmI’m not a particular Ron Paul fan, but I agree with him on that point . The War on Drugs is a farce. We have spent billions of dollars–and all we have to show for it is we have put violent drug cartels in business all over the world supplying the U.S. drug trade! Legalize drugs and all that goes away tomorrow, because the obscene profits to made on illegal drugs goes away.
Look, I don’t advocate drug use, but there are always a certain amount of people who are going to use drugs, no matter WHAT you do to try to save them. Everybody ELSE is not going to run out and start using self-destructive drugs, just because they are LEGAL. But by making them legal, you do several things:
1. You put a stop to about 70-80% of the violent crime in this country, which is drug-related (either drig dealers fighting for turf or addicts robbing and looting to get drugs at high street priices)
2. You put an end to violent drug cartels who are making BILLIONS because illegal drugs are PROFITABLE
3. You free up law enforcement resources that are overwhelmed and consumed with trying to limit the burgeoning drug trade for more IMPORTANT things like getting child molestors off the streets, etc.
4. You end needless overdose deaths due to varying drug quality
5. You tax it and use part of the proceeds to provide treatment for those who want OFF the drugs
6. You create jobs manufacturing, distributing drugs to drugs stores, etc.
NONE of that can happen as long as drugs are illegal
Report Post »Teaparty-grammy
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:09pmOh, yeah — and the OTHER thing you do by legalizing drugs is to take BILLIONS Of dollars that are in the underground drug economy, paying NO taxes, etc. and put a at least some of them back IN to the mainstream economy where it can be taxed–wouldn’t that be a BIG help to the economy?
It is NOT government’s business to legislate personal morality–and that is what they are trying to do with these drug laws. Apparently they learned NOTHING from the Prohibition fiasco of the 1920s–this is the EXACT same thing, and it needs to stop. By making drugs illegal, and therefore difficult and expensive to obtain by those who are going to do it anyhow, no matter WHAT the law says, they have created an entire underground industry supplying the illegal drug trade, just like they gave bith to the MAFIA’S bootleg liquor industry with Prohibition–because it is obscenetly PROFITABLE to supply these things that people are going to use no matter what the law says. But ONLY if they are declared illegal and made off-limits.
Do you not see, it is declaring them ILLEGAL and making them hard to get that is the TRUE root of the “drug problem” in the U.S., and not the drugs or drug users themselves? If we want to “help” drug users, then give them a safe and consistent drug supply they can obtain by prescription. And tax it to make funds available for drug treatment programs for those who want to quit doing drugs. (Most can’t get treatment now if they WANT it, because they have no
Report Post »Teaparty-grammy
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:33pmMeth is a nasty, dangerous drug. But it came about PRECISELY becae the “War on Drugs” has made other street drugs too expensive for the average addict–so these nasty and deadly homemade drugs were created to feed that market. Yet ANOTHER benefit to legalizing drugs would be, if a consistent supply of something safer were cheaply and legally available by PRESCRIPTION, then the market for these nasty and dangerous home-cooked drugs would disappear overnight and the people who make them would be out of business.
The War on Drugs is a dangerous fallacy that has cost our country much in terms of human waste, needless deaths and money. Of course the govt. will fight tooth and claw to keep the War on Drugs going, because it has become an entire industry and empire and a LOT of people are making a LOT of money administering and fighting this “war” (like all other wars, actually). But I am telling you, that the “War on Drugs” is the head of the snake–you cut that off by making the drugs legal, and all the rest of it dies, too–and THAT would be good for our country, for the people who are going to use drugs no matter WHAT the law says, and for the rest of the world that has been involuntarily dragged into this WAR by the obscene profits to be made by criminal cartels supplying the illegal U.S. drug market.
Report Post »Teaparty-grammy
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:57pm@ old blacksmith who Posted: “any legalization of drugs would have to include licensing drug companies to provide safe alternative recreational drugs. they could easily produce the chemicals to stimulate the neuro-receptors that are the root of addiction and provide a safe alternative to destructive drugs like crack, meth and paint huffing . . .
big pharma and recreational drugs?!?!? way, dude!!!! consider the world’s #2 selling drug – viagara. it’s quite popular & expensive and i’m willing to bet the over-60‘s crowd buying it ain’t really interested in making babies.”
Right ON, Old Blacksmith! People have this kneejerk, horrified reaction when you suggest legalizing drugs: “Drugs BAD! War on drugs GOOD!”
But the truth is, the “War on Drugs” has been horribly self-destructive for our country and most of the rest of the world where cartels have sprung up to make billions making drugs for the US drug trade and killing and/or terrorizing many of their fellow citizanes in the process. Why HELL, the TALIBAN in Afghanistan is financed by growing opium poppies to make heroin to sell in the good ole US of A. WAKE UP, people. We are NOT helping anybody by making drugs illegal–least of all ourselves. Making them illegal only makes them more profitable for the WRONG people!
I am not a drug user, have never been, and never would be, even if they were legal. But I recognize that some people are, and WILL be, no matter what. THAT is the reality we
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 6:21pmRon Paul doesn’t want to legalize drugs. He just wants it to be state law instead of federal mandate.
IDIOTS.
Report Post »Bonnieblue2A
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 6:24pmActually Ron Paul wants to leave the legislating of drugs to the states where it belongs per the US Constitution. History has taught us that in the USA people will always abuse substances regardless of the laws on our books.
Report Post »DivineMomentsOfTruth
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 7:59pmLegalizing drugs will never work in a Progressive, Immoral and Godless society..
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 8:28pmLibertarians are naïve about the range and perversity of human desires they propose to unleash on the U.S.A. They can imagine nothing more threatening than a bit of Sunday-afternoon sadomasochism, followed by some recreational drug use and work on Monday. They assume that if people are given freedom, they will gravitate towards essentially bourgeois lives, but this takes for granted things like the deferral of gratification that were pounded into them as children without their being free to refuse. They forget that for much of the population, preaching maximum freedom merely results in drunkenness, drugs, failure to hold a job, and pregnancy out of wedlock. Society is dependent upon inculcated self-restraint if it is not to slide into barbarism, and libertarians attack this self-restraint. Ironically, this often results in internal restraints being replaced by the external restraints of police and prison, resulting in less freedom, not more.
This contempt for self-restraint is emblematic of a deeper problem: libertarianism has a lot to say about freedom but little about learning to handle it. Freedom without judgment is dangerous at best, useless at worst. Yet libertarianism is philosophically incapable of evolving a theory of how to use freedom well because of its root dogma that all free choices are equal, which it cannot abandon except at the cost of admitting that there are other goods than freedom.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 10:00pmI love it when ignorance s shown regarding Ron Paul- first off, America has played some stupid foreign policy moves. Our CIA sucks. Most of our Politicians refuse to school themselves on the Middle East and the difference between Sunni and Shiite.
To say that our meddling and redistributing of Democracy did Not is some ways contribute to 9/11 you are delusional.
Second, our War on Drugs has funneled billions into all kinds of hands. The black market created by our laws on drugs has only upped their value. it has never deterred.
Report Post »I cannot stand hearing failed rhetoric regurgitated from conservatives no less.
Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 10:50pmTea Party Grammy- every one of your posts on this topic today is right on.
Report Post »People are uncomfortable with having to re evaluate everything they have been taught and throw it away. They were comfortable. our Politicans were fighting drugs to keep us safe, administering vaccines to herd immunity.
To think that human depravity has soiled so many things is hard to swallow.
thanks for reminding the masses about what Afghanistan is really about. Karzei’s brother is trouble…and yet we are there spending big bucks.
Then we ask Israel to pound sand.
Cosmos102
Posted on September 21, 2011 at 1:47amYou Ron Paul supporters are naive on the subject of legalizing drugs. Have you NOT witnessed what the United States Gov’t can do to a substance in order to derive more precious tax dollars from it? Crystal Meth won’t cost $37. It will cost that plus ever rising Fed taxes levied on it. Then all Health care will go up because of it. More regulations and taxes… The same way it has risen due to cigarette smoking. For crying out loud…you guys should have more of a vision of what is yet to come. A President Ron Paul may legalize drugs and make them Federally controlled but the next Democrat elected will seize the opportunity to tax it and corrupt it. Unless, that is…getting perpetually high on legal drugs makes people too strung out to go vote. In that case,the Democrats will have a problem. They only support things that make people dependent AND therefore voters.
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on September 21, 2011 at 2:42am@teapartygrammy
re : 1. You put a stop to about 70-80% of the violent crime in this country, …
2. You put an end to violent drug cartels … illegal drugs are PROFITABLE
3. You free up law enforcement resources
4. You end needless overdose deaths due to varying drug quality
5. You tax it and use part of the proceeds to provide treatment for those who want OFF the drugs
6. You create jobs manufacturing, distributing drugs to drugs stores, etc.
NONE of that can happen as long as drugs are illegal
Report Post »***
It sounds soooooooo good, but then there’s this thing called reality. Maybe you’ve never been around people who take drugs regularly but the little burgh I live near, very nearly legalized them years back when they advertised in the paper they had only 2 cops per ship, and plenty of playground at the local bars.
1. crime went up because addicts are MEAN, child abuse proliferate
2. doing away with profits if it’s legal would mean that $400 tennis shoes don’t exist, OR $1000 handbags, you’ll just get “knock-offs” more often
3. See above!
4. Think all the “junk” health foods, and supplements (many downright dangerous) most of these are legal, not necessarily healthy though, “You pays your money, you takes your chances!” Wasn’t that PT Barnum?
5. Works with tobacco doesn’t it?
6. Don‘t know that I’d want my 18 yr old grandkid to have that job, how about you?
Libertarian La-La Land sounds a whole lot like Liberal Utopia, and we see that now!
American Drywaller
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 8:13amUh no… You seem to oppose someone whose views you do not know. He wants to take it out of the federal’s hands and give it to the state. Something I would think most conservatives would agree with, you know smaller fed more states rights. On foreign policy I do have disagreements with Ron Paul, but lets state realities not hearsay and half-truths.
Report Post »NickyLouse
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:59amWhat did opium do to China?
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:09pmThanks, I sent the link to Glenn’s people.
Report Post »TxMadMac
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:08pmLock her up ’til she’s straight. Test her every 6 months. If she teats positive, take her kid away permanently. Life is tough and it’s not a game. Kids deserve better than that !
Report Post »Rowgue
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:19pmPeople don’t recover once they get addicted to meth. They end up dead or in prison, one or the other. Meth isn’t your typical drug, it‘s literally a mixture of a multitude of severely toxic and caustic chemicals that you’re snorting up your nose. It destroys your brain and your entire body quickly from the inside out. And not the way frilly ’80s anti drug commercials talked about weed destroying your brain, meth literally eats away at it, as it does with every part of the body.
Report Post »old blacksmith
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:35pmany legalization of drugs would have to include licensing drug companies to provide safe alternative recreational drugs. they could easily produce the chemicals to stimulate the neuro-receptors that are the root of addiction and provide a safe alternative to destructive drugs like crack, meth and paint huffing. a simple motor-skills test (timed performance against a personal baseline putting the right pegs in the right holes) could be used to determine a person’s ability to drive – that would catch not only drug abuse but also lack of sleep and just plain age related loss of reflex.
Report Post »currently quality control in the illicit drug manufacturing process consists of louie tasting the product. if he gets high, it’s good to go.
big pharma and recreational drugs?!?!? way, dude!!!! consider the world’s #2 selling drug – viagara. it’s quite popular & expensive and i’m willing to bet the over-60‘s crowd buying it ain’t really interested in making babies.
Vapor Trail
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:52pmROWGUE your only partly correct, while many people will never kick the habit, people can come clean from meth or any other drug if the choose and put forth the effort. In my early 20′s I was stupid like so many at that age, I used daily and was addicted to meth for 4 years. I’m 44 now and have been clean of meth and all drugs since 1993. It’s called personal choice and personal responsibility.
Report Post »Oh and it didn’t eat my brain, I am smart, awake and a critical thinker. I guess though had I not make the choice and kicked my addiction out the door, It would have eaten my brain and i would have become a zombie.
Enough is Enough__Oath_Keeper
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 6:21pmRowgue,
Report Post »I like the other person mentioned used to be addicted to meth and have been clean for going on 8 years now. Since I have got clean I have went and got my double major at a private Christian college in the Midwest and am currently in Law School. It is a very addictive drug and I am not trying to glorify it in any way just want to make the point that people can stop doing Meth. In fact I used Copenhagen chewing tobacco for 20+ years and I had more of a problem quitting that then I did Meth. The problem with Meth is that for a person to stop they have to be willing to change everything about their lives such as friends, environment, and sometimes family. Most just are not willing to do that! I would bet that addiction of most drugs would put you in the same position.
Jhangles
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:03pmHopefully the kid doesn’t feel guilt for “getting mommy in trouble”. I hope she gets the help she needs, and the little guy gets the care and love he needs.
Report Post »mils
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:12pmI hope it was handled with care on the teacher’s part. This young child was probably scared when mommie got in trouble..
Also, many of us lose loved ones and don’t resort to drugs…$3,700?…she ain’t hurtin for money obviously…or was she a dealer
Report Post »Salamander
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 9:23pmKids are pretty smart. I wouldn‘t be surprised if this child recognized a problem and saw an opportunity in ’show and tell’ to use a creative way to get help!
Report Post »Mrs. Bowers
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:01pmFound our education problem here in America.
Report Post »GodsDotr
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:01pmWhat is alarming is that this child was not taught that crack is a bad thing to have in your possession and was able to easily access it.
Report Post »ZaphodsPlanet
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:37pmRemember what the liberals like to say, “Don’t judge”…..LOL. This story is both sad and hilarious. The true victim here is the poor kid, but who knows, maybe he ended up saving his mother’s life long term which I hope will be the case.
Report Post »CitizenVetUSA
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:15pmPreschool children have little concept of sophisticated values.
Report Post »mlcblog
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:43pmOh, please. You expect her to get her meth AND teach her child, too? Get a clue.
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on September 21, 2011 at 2:57am@GodsDotr
Report Post »Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:01pm
What is alarming is that this child was not taught that crack is a bad thing to have in your possession and was able to easily access it.
***
Definitely a miracle he didn’t decide to try it out instead of taking it to school? Could have been a much sadder story than having to explain why mommy had to go to jail.
Exrepublisheep
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:57pm$3,700 in crack is a LOT of crack. They probably buster a dealer when they got her.
Report Post »Quagaar Warrior
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:04pm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Report Post »…and exactly how much have you spent on crack since you began smoking it?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
V-MAN MACE
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:14pmThey said it was meth…
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:30pmoops, meth.
Report Post »Rowgue
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:38pm$3,700 in meth is even more. Crack is expensive in comparison to meth.
Report Post »Quagaar Warrior
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:56pm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Report Post »The kid probably saved her life !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bullhorn Guy
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:55pmYou first.
Report Post »thegreatcarnac
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:55pmA future drug dealer in training.
Report Post »javasport
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:50pmOk kinda sad, but funnier when you envision the mom looking around the house and thinking, “now where did I put that crackpipe?”
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:49pmI am so glad this mother was ratted out by her kindergarten child even when it was unkowningly. Sometimes God works in myterious ways. This should be a warning to all the other crack heads out there. Your child may take your dope to school and bust your A______.
So glad he is out of that home. Hopefully, the relatives will be a good influence and can reverse the damage this mother has caused.
Report Post »purplehippo
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:46pmThere are some drugs that with just one use can leave a person addicted. Methanphetamine and Crack Cocaine have been known do this. It is a devastaing addiction. It can follow your whole life and years later draw you back into it again with just one mistake. My son is going through it right now. He is now serving another 7 years in prison becasue he was taunted just once. So before you criticize this woman, perhaps walk a mile in her shoes.
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:59pmI am sorry for your son, but he made his bed and now he is lying in it. He had a choice and he made the wrong one. I do not feel sorry for anyone who turns to drugs either for pleasure or escape and stays there. I do applaud anyone who can come out the other side clean and sober. Sorry, I don’t want to walk in their shoes.
My life is pretty ****** right now myself, unemployed and not sure I will get a job to keep my home. However, through the grace of God, I will get through this and do so without turning to drugs. Taking drugs would not change my situation, in fact, it would guarantee I stayed where I am or even worse, homeless.
For your sake, I hope your son has learned drugs are not the way to go. You can’t escape life unless you die, so you have to learn to deal with what life deals you. As they say, “What doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger”.
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on September 21, 2011 at 3:14am@cofemale
Report Post »re : My life is pretty ****** right now myself, unemployed and not sure I will get a job to keep my home. However, through the grace of God, I will get through this and do so without turning to drugs. Taking drugs would not change my situation, in fact, it would guarantee I stayed where I am or even worse, homeless.
****
Heard a young former addict studying to be a preacher talk about his addiction once. He said he used to “mainline elephant tranquilizers” he was talking about God delivering him, said he lived in FL and his family in OH, “I was behind in my rent and no food in my refrigerator, so I got high, when I came down someone’d stole my refrigerator.” He said he decided to kill himself, but wanted to throw a party to say goodbye to his friends first. They brought the food & drugs, he got high, and came down on the beach several days later, his apartment gone, someone stole all his clothes. He went home to say goodbye and his sisters invited him to a youth activity at there church, he went, and to church with them the next day. As his sisters sang a special he began praying, When he felt changed & asked the preacher about it, he told him he’d heard “old fashioned” preachers talk about what he described, they called it getting saved. He took him to a “Rescue mission near Barberton, so he could learn about it. Didn’t even know himself, yet God reached into that church & saved that man!
Hallelujah!
trolltrainer
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:45pmIf it wasn’t so tragic it would be hilarious…
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:40pmAgreed. A six year-old, I don’t believe, knows how bad drugs are, and the mother, hopefully, will get through this, all the stronger. That little boy needs a male influence in his life.
Report Post »Talmid of Yeshua
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:44pmIt wasn’t a crack pipe, it was a meth pipe. Two different drugs.
Report Post »Uncurable wound
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:44pmIts got to be tough to be a kid these days…Tomorrow wont be any easier.
Report Post »DAYWATCHER
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:43pmHow sad. His parents are obviously stupid dope heads. Did he show the kids how to puff, puff, pass? Did he get an A for the day? He should get a A+, he may have just saved his parents lives.
Report Post »14ESCHATOLOGY
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:50pmWhat‘s even sadder is one’s inability to read and comprehend what they have read. His father died less than a year ago, therefore the plural use of parent is incorrect.
Report Post »…then I stopped reading. :)
SICKOFPCNESS
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:42pmFeel sorry for the boy but maybe some jail time will wake her sorry butt up…..she has a son!
Report Post »ThomasUSA
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:42pmJust think of what this child sees as “normal” in their daily life. Its no wonder, we have an entitlement society. This was the intent of the Democratic party. To create a society of dependent people. “Demo-cracks”… a new word that describes what the progressive/socialist/ communists of the world have wanted to establish for decades.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:41pmThat is VERY sad what happened to the boy‘s dad and this woman’s husband…and to turn to drugs is even sadder…what I want to know is where was the family and friends prior to them taking him, I know if my children or family members we’re doing drugs, with little ones in the house, you can bet I would do something about it. Or try to!
Report Post »ionic
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:40pmReason #456 to home-school.
Report Post »c.rozycki
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:00pmagreed
Report Post »YoungConservativesRule
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 5:17pmI prefer private.
Report Post »SageInWaiting
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:40pmOooops.
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:39pmSo, what are we supposed to do? Feel sorry for her because her husband passed away and she turned to crack? Really? I think she needs to focus on her son instead of herself.
Report Post »RocktheCasbah
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:43pmI agree. I doubt seriously that she just started using the crack after her husband passed.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:38pmDumb MOM!! She needs HELP.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 3:34pmThe stupidity of these druggies just *cracks* me up!
Report Post »LibertyLover2
Posted on September 20, 2011 at 4:04pmFor those of you so happy the child ‘got his mom in trouble’. Think about the child’s world now… he is now essentially orphaned by our laws and government. YES this is a problem that needs to be addressed- but legal trouble, prison, and an essentially parentless child are not the answer. Clearly she needs help, the local community needs to address a problem like this. Drug abuse should not be a legal problem, it is closer to a medical problem. My heart goes out to the mom and child.
Report Post »