Politics

Krauthammer Slams Liberal Hypocrisy on Rush, Points to Maher and Louis C.K.

During “Inside Washington” Friday night, the always outspoken Conservative Washington Post Columnist Charles Krauthammer weighed in on the current controversy surrounding Rush Limbaugh. Krauthammer gave his opinion that those on the left who have so heavily criticized Rush for his comments regarding Sandra Fluke should change the channel to liberal companions guilty of similar misogyny, such as comedian Louis C.K. and million dollar Obama super PAC contributor Bill Maher.

“The hypocrisy on the left about this about Rush Limbaugh, as if he is the spokesman for the Republican Party, and as if misogyny is exclusively the province of conservatives and Republicans,” Krauthammer said. “It’s out there all the time Maher, Chris Matthews, with this guy — is it C.K. Louis, or Louis C.K. who is going to be the emcee at the congressional correspondents dinner. So, when I hear a denunciation on the left, I will expect one on the right.”

The Daily Caller cut video of Krauthammer’s stand on the issue Friday:

Comments (103)

1 2
  • Viking64
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:21am

    Why does the Blaze management even waste time talking about the left being up set with Rush, Hannity, Beck,etc? The left cannot really dispute most any of the facts these conservative hosts speak, so they go after any source, legal or illigal , any kind of slander they can spin to the dumbest among us. They will always appeal to the down and out or the elitist liberals who prosper by the corrupt policies of the left. Rush has more intelligence and skill ,than all left wing commentators!
    Charles is extremely smart and of course the lefties can’t deal with it! Rush will continue doing well!

    Report Post »  
  • SK-1
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:11am

    Not Fair and Balanced. They need 8 liberals to go against Charlie!

    Report Post »  
  • SK-1
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:10am

    I love the way the 3 liberals get their collective panties in a bunch. Cant even let Charles finish a sentence.
    This isn’t really fair. They need twice as many liberals to go against Charlie!

    Report Post »  
  • right
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:03am

    I don’t much care about Rush insulting poor Ms Fluke. Rush is an entertainer. His show will live or die depending on listener support or non support.

    Let’s stick to the issues and forget about the non-issues the libs keep putting in front of us.

    This election is about the economy, gas prices, unemployment, entitlements, no or poor leadership from obama. obama is running us into the ground, taking away our liberties every chance he gets and trashing our Constitution.

    We need to stand up and stand together to defeat him in Nov. Let’s not get sidetracked with non issues. The main stream media is once again doing all they can trying to set the agenda for him to win.

    Quit playing their game. Discuss issues and solutions.
    Beat obama by pointing out, over and over his failures. There are so many. I don‘t understand why the R’s aren’t using what they have at their fingertips to show how bad things are.
    How many people are out of work or under-employed. Look at the price of gas. That hits everyone. Use it. Just because obama says something doesn’t make it true. These things do matter to us. Start now saying it over and over that obama is running this country into the ground. Show examples over and over. Beat him at his own game.
    Birth control is not an issue. It’s available everywhere, and often free. Quit letting the libs side track this election.
    TALK ABOUT THE REAL ISSUES.

    Report Post »  
    • encinom
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:08am

      One thing the right is missing, Rush is the voice of the GOP as demostrated by the actions of the GOP leadership to statements by Rush, the other the right are citing are comedians and treated as such by the left. The comparison is a false one.

      Report Post »  
    • SoupSandwich
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:56am

      Encinomom-
      STFU. Blather, blah, blather, blah.

      Report Post »  
    • encinom
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:12am

      Of course Obama has reversed the job lose trend that W. started and has increased job growth. The GOP has zero credibility on the economy.

      Report Post »  
    • thecid100
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:51am

      Encino mom,

      Rush is an entertainer, and not the voice of the GOP. Your silly excuse is a poor one. As ususal.

      Report Post »  
    • encinom
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:19pm

      @thecid100
      Rush bills himself as the voice of the Conservative movement and the GOP. And the GOP leadership responds to him in kind. He is not an entertainer, the GOP leadership would not walk on egg shells not to upset Rushbo if he was just an entertainer.

      Report Post »  
    • cosette
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:10pm

      @ Encinom… The ‘left“ did not treat comedian Michael Richards comments towards a black audience member during a stand up performance in 2006 as ”comedy”. As I recall they were apoplectic.. There were demands for an apology and even monetary restitution. Al Sharpton Jesse Jackson, California democrat politicians, they all got their face time in the MSM. Google the incident, or better yet you tube it. Now explain to me WHY the left went nuts on Richards, yet Maher gets a pass. I’ll tell you why. Because the former went on a racist rant against a black man, and the latter obsesses over conservative women and says the most vile things about them. Black man…. Conservative woman. It’s not about the crass comments at all. It’s about the target. Blacks are a protected class in the media and the democrat party. They are shielded and given preferential treatment. Conservative women, not so much.

      Report Post »  
    • RajCaj
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:21pm

      I‘d agree with you if it weren’t for the point that in our day & age, perception is reality. The media controls the perception and purposley avoid the real issues and want only to focus on the hot button topic of the week.

      What are the Republican candidates supposed to do when every single beat reporter & major news network anchor insistantly asks to talk about issues that get drummed up instead of things like the economy, gas prices, or foriegn policy?

      If they spend the time to defend themselves, they spend that time NOT talking about gas prices, housing market, economy. If they DONT spend the time to defend themselves, they get painted as out of touch, aloof, insensitive…and otherwise not fit for president.

      Report Post »  
  • no1hd
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:12am

    I have a choice on what and where to spend my money..It will not be with the companies that chose abortion, free contraception, anti-Christian opinions or any of the extreme liberal causes over free speech..Enough is enough..
    First on my list will be State Farm, which I have been a loyal customer for years, then right on down the list..

    Report Post »  
    • CLG 4
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:53am

      The compaines that quit rush did so for finiancial reasons not something he said. The real problem here is that the democrats hve passed thier new constitution (the health bill) and are now proceeding to shove it down our throats. Thus we have pelosi holding news conference and making it look like a hearing.

      Report Post »  
  • jujubeebee
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:54am

    Jzs is a typical liberal. He can’t actually present a case for anything without throwing dirt. He comes on here to be nasty and contrary because his life is lacking. He has nothing without being able to argue and be nasty. His life is meaningless and this gives him something to do. It is sad really. If he were a happier person he would be out having breakfast with his liberal friends or on a liberal website but instead he comes on here to be able to have a life.

    Report Post »  
  • crazyoz
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:48am

    Stop talking about this Bimbo fluke and she will disappear.

    Report Post »  
  • crazyoz
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:44am

    It’s time to go after the advertisers on MSNBC. I AM!

    Report Post »  
    • littlefish
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:55am

      MSNBC has advertisers ?

      I thought they were totally subsidized by the communist and democratic parties !!

      Report Post » littlefish  
    • 65Mustang
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:11pm

      I can’t stand to watch MSNBC long enough to know who the advertisers are….does anyone know?

      Report Post »  
  • fancydancy
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:41am

    It seems that Rush is being blamed for something Ms. Fluke described herself as. A word is a word with dictionary explanations. She described herself and Rush defined the word. He didn’t call her that…she did before Congress and the media goes nuts. (Whoops….my bad.)

    Report Post »  
  • liljoe62
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:14am

    It seems to me( an un-educated political novice according to the Dems) that the country is on a collision coarse of IGNORANT into ( ALL KNOWING) ! That will end up with a total annihilation of intelligence! Only thing to be left is, a third world economy, and political small class! Wake the hell up people, and read the writing on the wall! If one side or the other is in total control, it with render TOTAL CHAOS, as we have had for a while now! And I am NOT talking politics, I mean STUPIDITY at the highest levels! Get these IDIOTS ( ALL OF THEM ) in congress OUT! Start fresh! TOP TO BOTTOM! Period, or we are surely doomed from their idiotic thoughts from the control WE GAVE THEM! Good luck America, we are going to need it!!

    Report Post »  
    • not funny
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:24am

      The Politico had a story about the Left trying to get advertisers pulled from Hannity, Beck, Levin and others to get them off the air. When I looked later, the story had been taken down. Make no mistake, they are trying to shut up the voices who oppose them. This is outrageous.

      Report Post »  
  • whereareyourbrains
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:27am

    JZS……………with people like you supporting the idiot in charge………..American still has a chance to stay as a republic………..not a democracy, but a republic…………use your typing fingers and look it up.
    You are among the many idiots that would bow down and kiss his toes and say yes masser……..and that is what he wants………………

    Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
  • whereareyourbrains
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:22am

    Rush said things that the left is having a blast with. This opened to door for them to try and shut him down. He is a conservative message man………..that is equivalent to trying to shut down Fox.
    They don’t care about the women..(the left) as usual they will use them to get to where they want to go. THAT is to shut down the messages from the left…….at any cost. They win…………

    Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
  • pwatkins
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 2:04am

    The left doesn’t want to listen to Rush bc he is rude, and doesn’t want to listen to Charles K. bc he is polite..but the real truth here is the left doesn’t really listen to anyone…just follows Obama blindly and deafly to the wrong side of reality. Rush is smart and tough, Charles is very smart and discreet…listening to both could save all Americans, even you liberals from total defeat.

    Report Post »  
    • jdtanker
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:13am

      You are right on the money.

      Report Post » jdtanker  
    • jujubeebee
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:45am

      You are so right. I have been out there with facts to some of my liberal friends (not sure I want them as friends any more) giving them facts and there are three that simply didn’t want to hear another word against Obama. I have lost respect for them and don’t even care to continue being friends over this. They won‘t engage with me what their position is or defend it and they won’t even listen or read anything contrary to the propaganda. It is like a cult. Liberals are like a cult. What amazes me is that when you hear them on tv they all have exactly the same position on every single issue. How can that be? How can Catholics defend the mandate that takes away religious freedom from their own faith and side with whatever Obama and his team mandate? Have they lost their own ability to think?

      Report Post »  
  • BigDaddyTex
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:27am

    Is it me, or does it seem like ALL of Washington and the media have all hopped in a time machine and been transported back to the 8th grade? It‘s like they’re all back in junior high and are saying “Johnny, did you hear what Cindy said about you? Cindy… Mathew said you like Andrew! Is that true or do you still like Bruce?!?!?!? Susan! Brad said YOU kissed Shane, but we KNOW you like Russell!!!”….

    God, PLEASE help us!!!!!!

    Report Post »  
    • lukerw
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:39am

      They are avoiding the Real Issues: there is Treason afoot… and this Nation cannot continue like this!

      Report Post » lukerw  
    • BigDaddyTex
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:44am

      You are correct. It CANNOT!
      It’s time to grow up or split the sheets!!!

      http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/irreconcilable+differences

      Report Post »  
    • AmericanFightingMan1
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:48am

      Man, I miss W.F. Buckley.

      Report Post » AmericanFightingMan1  
    • db321
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:54am

      EVERYTHING Obama touches has a reverse effect – this is not normal – Obama has a Reverse Midas Touch – Obama is a dismal failure – a despicable person – and a huge mistake for America – and the Liberal Media looks like utter idiots trying to cover for him.

      I can’t remember a time when I wanted to see an election date come quicker than now! The Liberal Media is now conducting “Crisis Management” for Obama and his Administration. This means that they know Obama is going to be defeated – America – don’t give up – Nov will be here soon!

      Report Post » db321  
    • Alky
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:14am

      @db321 “America don’t give up Nov will be here soon!”

      Do you really think Obama will step away from the spotlight and all the perks in November? He’s the last American President. Why do you thing OWS is gearing up for a huge demonstration this summer? That will be just the national emergency he needs to put on his dictator hat and postpone elections… indefinitely!

      Report Post » Alky  
  • lukerw
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:27am

    No, Lincoln is Right; No, Davis is Right! We are at War… and you are not going to change anyone’s Opinion! We are at War… and we don’t seem to realize it!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • jzs
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:25am

    Charles Krauthammer’s idea of a good time is travelling alone to the Dominican Republic with a full bottle of Viagra prescribed to someone else. What is he doing traveling alone in the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra? Aren’t all the men, women and children there kind of brown? Or maybe that was Limbaugh.

    Report Post » jzs  
  • Arizona Don
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:37pm

    Obama is destroying this country and we are discussing Rush Limbaugh calling someone a slut? Does that say anything about our priorities? How is it we allow the obama administration to distract this way?

    Report Post » Arizona Don  
    • right
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:09am

      I’m with you. I’m so sick of the agenda being set by the media. Discuss the problems and the solutions.

      Report Post »  
  • The Third Archon
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:05pm

    “I will expect one on the right.”
    Oh, I wouldn’t–it’s not that the Left really cares whether or not the Right disowns Limbaugh for his comments. It’s up to each of them individually. However, any PROPER Leftist can’t make anything of this but YET ANOTHER example of what an awful creature Limbaugh is.

    Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • The Gooch
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:57am

      I believe Limbaugh is a self-important tool (long before this drama)… who happened to call BS (when it should’ve been called, but in a manner that could be used to redefine an argument. I also believe progressives and leftists are shameless creatures who believe in different rules for different people…as they see fit. And the worst busybodies amongst them readily assert rules don’t matter… when they (the enlightened ones) know best. Defend as you will. For your own good and the good of the collective, you can and will be told what to eat, think and own. Funny how progressivism and leftism so readily embrace dismissive totalitarianism… for our own good, of course.

      Report Post »  
  • The Third Archon
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:04pm

    “The hypocrisy on the left…I will expect one on the right.”
    Funny how 2/3 examples he provides don’t even DO the same thing as Limbaugh–they make JOKES for a living, as opposed to Limbaugh and Matthews who both purport to be objective “reporters of matters of fact.” Well, sorry, but when you start claiming to be saying OBJECTIVE, rather than SUBJECTIVE, things, the standard of scrutiny is higher and your CREDIBILITY becomes an issue.

    Furthermore, just USING the words “slut” or “****” ISN’T the problem, ISN’T what is sexist–anymore than black people who choose to use the word “******” are inherently racist against black people. Because the MAJORITY of black people who use this word, aren’t IMPLYING that black people are an inherently INFERIOR “race” group to whites, whereas many people who DO use that word (in a pejorative sense) ARE implying just that. Now, certain “female only” derogatory words may have been in bad taste when they were used by “newsmen” like Limbaugh and Matthews, but Limbaugh’s ATTITUDE towards women, as a group is different, and OBVIOUSLY sexist (in that, he thinks that women who use contraception, or more specifically those that need help paying for it, are categorically sluts), than JUST saying the words “slut” or “****.”

    Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • EddardinWinter
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:23pm

      I certainly HEAR you very CLEARLY!

      Report Post » EddardinWinter  
    • jcasos
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:30am

      The comedy part is your unfitting outrage to what Limbaugh said. The reason you can’t judge where to set your outrage is because it is completely manufactured. You also state “helping” those who can’t afford contraception. If you can’t afford $4 a month, you shouldn’t be engaging in an act that can produce a child anyway. Remember contraception is only 99% effective, abstinence is 100%. This all goes back to “censoring” what you hate, and the fairness doctrine. I don‘t think anyone really believes what you’re saying.

      Where does it end? I need the Internet to refill my prescriptions, so I should testify and get the gov’t to pay for it. Oh, I need a clock to know when I need to take my medication, I should testify and get the gov’t to pay for it. Uh oh, I have to walk to my mailbox to get my medication. I should testify and get the gov’t to pay for a mailbox, my shoes, some winter-clothes for those cold days and some summer clothes for those warm days (it’s illegal to walk outside naked). Uh oh, I can’t read anything without glasses, so I should testify and get the gov’t to pay for those…wouldn’t want to take too many pills now would we!

      See how stupid this crap can get? And yet people like you will say there is a “war on blind people”, “war on shirtless people”, “war on mailboxless people”, “war on Interwebless people”, and a “war on shoeless people”. Time to stop acting, your feigned outrage gave you away.

      Report Post »  
    • jacques.daspy
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:57am

      Ms. Fluke was engaged in selling certain body parts in a manner described to titillate and stimulate Congressmen. Apparently she did it on behalf of an organization that routinely practices the particular trade involving those procedures for certain gains, leading to the satisfaction of others.

      Report Post »  
    • cosette
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:12am

      @ Thirdarchon-” Funny how 2/3 examples don’t even do the same thing as Limbaugh, they make JOKES for a living”. Allow me to refresh your memory of another comedian who “makes jokes for a living”. Nov. 20, 2006. Michael Richards a.k.a. Kramer from Seinfeld, went on a epithet laced rant against a “private BLACK citizen” who was in the audience during stand up performance in a comedy club in L.A. Well all HELL broke loose in the same main stream media that is now protecting people like Maher and Louis CK. with this fabricated comedian shield. You do know the difference don’t you? Of course you do. The black audience member was a also a member of the protected class, he was BLACK. The conservative women who are constantly attacked by leftist comedians are not. I want you to respond to my comment to explain your double standard, unless you approve of a COMEDIAN calling a PRIVATE CITIZEN a N**ger.

      Report Post »  
    • Choctaw25
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:36am

      What the he** was that about????????

      Report Post » Choctaw25  
    • cosette
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:57pm

      @ Choctaw… Are you referring to my post ? If you had difficulty understanding I will try to explain it to you.

      Report Post »  
  • Robert-CA
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:02pm

    Yep , nobody can beat the Charles :)

    Report Post » Robert-CA  
    • TORCH9
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:41pm

      Charles speaks the Truth. No matter what side you claim to be on. He’s raw and to the point, and with such grace…..It’s hilarious how the others in this video are falling over themselves, stammering, trying to be intelligent

      Report Post » TORCH9  
    • GumRock
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:41am

      Chuck The Man !

      Report Post » GumRock  
  • The Gooch
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 10:37pm

    Preach on, brother! Charles has guts and brains, two qualities not appreciated in the emasculated world of pop media. And, of course, he knows there will never be a two way street of expectations regarding the ideological “mea culpa.”

    Report Post »  
  • cookcountypatriot
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 10:16pm

    the television is full of sluts from all ends of out society,,from jerry springer ( progressive ) to housewifes of atlanta,orangecounty and wherever ( progressive hollywood) look at the hollywood so called starlets,,major SLUTS…and when rush points out some 30 something still in a very expensive college wants us to pay her contraceptive bill…i can only think..what a slut…its a pos argument from the guilty white slaves to deflect your attention from thier failed policys ,,,i mean c,mon…does anyone really believe a word that a pos like pelosi has to say..really?

    Report Post » cookcountypatriot  
  • Steelhead
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 10:12pm

    I really don‘t like the idea of paying for Rush’s recreational sex either. I’m sure his viagra is covered by his health insurance plan

    Report Post » Steelhead  
    • maccow
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 10:36pm

      Stolenmind
      Nice try but Rush has always trumpeted the fact that he doesn’t have a health plan. He pays in cash.

      Report Post » maccow  
    • The Gooch
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 10:48pm

      Uh… man, talk about reading between the lines. Hell, I’m not even sure you read the posted article or watched the video in quetion.
      Classic: A panelist broaches the subject of Limbaugh and a compatriot wants to know why time is being spent on Limbaugh while Krauthammer serves up a rightly deserved crow… which is, of course, soundly ignored with deflection. Hmm, I guess it‘s easier to spout your team’s side and then attempt to shut up the opposition than to actually engage in debate and own your team’s bastards. This is why I stay guarded around right leaning partisans… but absolutely loathe leftists and progressives.
      And you play the same game by going off on a tangent about Limbaugh’s virility. Whatever….

      Report Post »  
    • RobMac68
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:02pm

      A man’ body designed to work a certain way, and when you get older it doesn’t work the same. That sounds like a health issue. A woman’s body designed to get pregnant with sex and you want the sex but not the baby, where is that a health issue? Sounds like a personal issue to me. You’re comparing apples to oranges, which the left seems to do quite well.

      Report Post »  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:13pm

      I disagree–if Limbaugh were poor, I would say this shouldn’t mean that his substantive right to have progeny should be waived. Viagra should be covered for those who can’t afford it–so too should contraceptives.

      Ask yourself, which is BETTER for society? Fewer unwanted children that their parents can’t take care of? Fewer sexually transmitted diseases? Or the opposite? The choice is relatively obvious for any rational person. I’m tired of this stupid arguments over “who’s fault it is”–yeah, that’s nice, I don’t care; I care about what WORKS. Forgive me for my impatience, while American veterans are homeless, Americans die on the streets of hunger and exposure, American soldiers die for the enrichment and profit of people who don’t have a DAMN about America OR her people, who have worked at EVERY turn to exploit and squeeze the American people for EVERY LAST OUNCE OF PROFIT THEY CAN GET, before packing their bags for Singapore, Hong Kong, or any of the many numerous Laissez-faire paradises. Yes, FORGIVE me, if my sympathy for such people has run dry, while so much REAL suffering takes place. No illegitimate and unjust system of relations can last forever–the powerful WILL be brought down, their arrogance WILL be checked, and there WILL be justice and freedom for ALL, not the MERELY privileged few.

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • EddardinWinter
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:34pm

      You know, third, I know I don’t like being SHOUTED at. I do know that is what people who have run out of ideas do. And you speak condescendingly to me of reason? What reason then gives my government to take what is mine to pay for recreational sex? This is already available at low costs, now you shout at me to give it for free. I say no more. You come and take what’s mine if you want more.

      Report Post » EddardinWinter  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on March 11, 2012 at 11:50pm

      1) Considering that, until you replied to ME, there weren’t ANY posts from you on this page, I don’t see how you can be offended as though I were directing anything I said at your specifically and personally.
      2) Yes, I do think the government has every right to take the course, of all available to it, that provides the greatest good to the greatest number. So to answer your question–the REASON is the public good. The government has done much much more, for FAR FAR less obviously beneficial (in fact, sometimes outright NEGATIVE) reasons in the past. I obviously think we should avoid doing the negative, but the government’s ONLY POINT in existing is to do at least SOME of the positive when it is within its power to do so.
      3) Contraception is useful for more than just recreational sex–it ALSO can help sex, of any kind, be safer (in terms of the likelihood of contracting a venereal disease), as well as many hormone based forms of contraception can make the periods of women, some of which are debilitating, much less unpleasant.
      4) Some percentage of people WILL become pregnant with children they can’t afford. They, and quite likely for some of their life at least their children, will almost certainly end up on the public dole anyway. So is it better to be preventative and have fewer of them, lowering costs, or not?

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • EddardinWinter
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:19am

      Third-
      When you post on a public site, you speak to every visitor on the site. ALL CAPS is shouting in contemporary writing. I did not say I was offended, I stated that I don’t like it. I criticized the manner in which you seek to use guilt manipulate me into paying for others birth control (and viagra). I also do not like being told wealth=greed. Our sense of independance and self sufficience are being eroded. How else do you explain demands that free contaception be provided? Rubbers are very cheap, until the government starts giving them away. Using rubbers to sleep around is fine. Why do you demand that I pay for it? That is why I describe it as recreational sex. All of the benefits of birth control you state are correct. It helps society. I am pro birth control. I am sick of other people’s pet projects being financed by producers. I make a good living. I have earned every penny. All of you folks who want to give away health care or whatever should pay for it yourselves. Stop telling people who actually make money they are evil for it. You know, people will fail to use birth control even when you give it away.

      Report Post » EddardinWinter  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:46am

      STEELHEAD: “I really don‘t like the idea of paying for Rush’s recreational sex either. I’m sure his viagra is covered by his health insurance plan.”
      Apparently you haven’t the power of thought process to figure this simple statement out. I’m sure that you would find this fact rather odd, but what necessitates the use of Viagra is an actual medical malady. While natural procreation is not. The medical malady is exactly what medical insurance was designed to cover.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
    • cosette
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:29am

      @ Third Archon… Scroll up. Answer my post if you can!

      Report Post »  
    • cosette
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:38am

      @ Third…. Eddinwinter did respond to you half way up this page. The fact that you DIDN“T respond to me is proof you CAN”T.

      Report Post »  
    • SoupSandwich
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:54am

      Head-
      You must enjoy the punishment, but I won’t pay or play into your S&M. What a wanker.

      Report Post »  
    • Hill60
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:31pm

      I’d be willing to be that the number of insurance companies/policies that cover Viagra is pretty small.

      I would suppose that unless a doctor can convince the insurance company that there’s a benefit to taking Viagra for a reason other than creating an erection for casual sex (like using birth control pills for ovarian cysts rather than birth control) not many insurance companies are gonna cover it.

      Report Post »  
  • doomytram
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 10:03pm

    In Barrack’s world, The Left, this election is about class war, rubbers, and women haters and racist’s.
    In the real world, The Right, this election is about the economy, gas prices, and fiscal sanity.

    Report Post » doomytram  
    • Bids
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:58pm

      And yet they say nothing about those things.

      Report Post »  
  • MHM
    Posted on March 11, 2012 at 9:55pm

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search
    Slut or slattern is a term applied to an individual who is considered to have loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous. The term is generally pejorative and often applied to women as an insult or offensive term of disparagement, meaning “dirty or slovenly.”[1] However some women have demonstrated saying they’re proud of being “sluts”, and have given it a positive connotation.[

    Does this mean that Rush was complimenting her?

    Report Post »  
    • Hickory
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:13am

      She’s a slut……………………………

      Report Post » Hickory  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love