Government

Left’s Fascism Exposed: Obama by Decree Should Strip Companies the Government Pays of Their Right to Engage in Political Activities Including Funding Think Tanks According to Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich

Comments (182)

1 2 3 ... 5
  • Atilla
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 9:05am

    Fascism has been exposed for a very long time prior to this idiot commenting on what he thinks is appropriate. As in the 1930′s in Germany, it’s called blind indefferance when they came for the Jews. Guss what folks, it’s a repeat performance.

    Report Post »  
  • tmkphx1962
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 9:04am

    Then all unions need to be forbidden from taking part in any political activities. The progressives better watch out a gop president could sign an eo dealing with the unions in this fashion.

    Report Post »  
    • Eblaze44
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:03pm

      you gotta get one in there first – and that seems like a very slim chance this next year. Republicans, conservatives and tea party, along with the media rip themselves to shreds. Obama leans back and continues his march towards socialism.

      Report Post » Eblaze44  
  • Derfel Cadarn
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 9:04am

    I have no problem with this logic,as long as anyone receiving money in any way shape or form are also excluded from ANY donations. This is to include SS,welfare,food stamps,college loans,grants,medicare,medicaid,paid government employees,their nuclear families,institutes of learning(getting any form of government aid),unions representing these workers absolutely ANYONE that has received any largess from government. This would shrink revenue streams for candidates by exponential amounts and show the American people who actually controls their elections and so their government. The list above is only partial and careful consideration of this precept should logically eliminate 90% of all political donations. I believe this would make America a better place.

    Report Post »  
    • CaptDick
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:58pm

      A thoughtful reply but sadly such logic is always lost in the demagoguery of DC.

      Report Post » CaptDick  
    • Eblaze44
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:00pm

      You truly will have to explain to me why someone, just for receiving Social Security which they paid into, could not contribute. I suppose you would include any veterans retired or receiving disability pay?

      I am for taking away the voting rights of anyone not paying taxes.

      Report Post » Eblaze44  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 11:20pm

      How about Income Tax refunds, I know dem‘s who think they’re a GIFT from the government?
      And while we’re at it : “I believe this would make America a better place.”
      **
      Let’s really clean it up, let’s limit ALL campaigns to the money the candidate himself earns with manual labor during his campaign, AT MINIMUM WAGE! LET THEM WASH CARS, WAIT TABLES, DIG DITCHES, (Does anyone still do that these days?), BUILD THINGS WITH THEIR HANDS AND HOLD FLEA MARKETS TO SELL THEM! (At normal market prices.) Then they pay for their own transportation, drive themselves to and from, pump their own gas, etc. Who’d need the expensive TV time, etc., you’re liable to run into your candidate at the gas station, or (I’m sure) somebody will probably post the video’s on U Tube. (No cost incurred.)

      Report Post »

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • Mateytwo Barreett
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:55am

    Intersting. So where does this put public sector UNIONS? BTW. Ia Robert Reich Paul Krugman’s other personality?

    Report Post » Mateytwo Barreett  
  • BQI
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:47am

    Hitler would be proud of Robert as obviously Robert is in love with Hitler’s tactics.

    Read about The Black Hitler @ http://www.blackquillandink.com

    On occasion BQI comes into possession of little known news stories. We will try to post those that we believe are interesting and that will further the conversation of recapturing conservative and Founding principles of America. Todays article is the story of a Chicago community organizer that utilized gangster and Hitler styled tactics to grow and wield power and influence.

    Report Post » BQI  
  • Joe Palooka
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:38am

    The fourth Reich is on the “short” list.

    Report Post »  
    • Ironeagle
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:49am

      Good one–when Reich goes on the stump, its literal.

      Report Post » Ironeagle  
  • dpselfe
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:37am

    Robert Reich…….Third Reich………….coincidence?

    I think not.

    Report Post » dpselfe  
  • 50BMG
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:36am

    And since Reich was paid by the federal government for many years, probably receives a government pension, and is currently an employee of the People’s Republic of California, he should be stripped of his right to engage in political activities and discourse.

    All men are created equal, but progressives are more equal than all men.

    Report Post » 50BMG  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 11:08pm

      All men are created equal, but progressives are more equal than all men.
      *************
      ONe question : EQUAL TO WHAT ??

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • lketchum
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:33am

    Red Fascist Bastards!

    That is all these power hungry people are.

    People, wake up! As soon as they are done consolidating power they will use that power to start to round up groups of people made up of anyone with wealth independent of the state. They will seize businesses, private practices, homes, accounts and all associated property. They will eventually enslave the small business and professional class and work us to death serving their state.

    Remember, treason is whatever the king and his lawyers say it is and if you think the despot we have in the Whitehouse does not see himself like this, then I beg you to explain his actions and those of his supporters.

    This is what fascism looks like!

    Report Post » lketchum  
  • ofallon
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:28am

    They know they can’t get their agenda through Congress. They have to persuade the President to use executive order but if Obama truly wants to be re-elected he has to tread softly unless of course it‘s Hillary’s turn to be President. He will destroy as much as he can in the next 18 months and then pass the torch to Hillary so she can finish the fundamental transformation of the United States. They may not like each other but they work together for the common good which is to destroy our country.

    Report Post »  
    • Eblaze44
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:56pm

      Need to start a campaign, Hillary for President. I’d like to see how they bash each other this time.

      Report Post » Eblaze44  
  • sbenard
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:28am

    Is it any wonder his name is “Reich”? He would fit right in with the Third Reich!

    A few years ago, Reich also said that NO person of faith should EVER be permitted to hold any political or other office in government!

    It is no small wonder that progressives loved even major tyrant and dictator of the 20th century. They adored Hitler, Stalin, and Mao. Only when their atrocities were revealed did they then throw them under the bus and try to rewrite their own history. It was from American progressives that Hitler learned propaganda. They loved tyrants because their philosophies and methodologies were the same, not because they were cute.

    Reich is one of the most arrogant and unapologetic of these tyrannical progressives!

    Report Post » sbenard  
    • rgranger
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 2:26am

      Wouldn’t he be surprised if an agnostic patriot were in charge that had no qualms about plowing under the seeds of socialism. They forget that the things they criticize us for, may be the only things keeping us from wiping them off the face of this Continent: faith, rule of law, since of fair play, conscience. Keep pushing, for my child’s sake I can put a few of those on hold!

      Report Post »  
  • De minimus
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:27am

    Geee….. All that Marxist thought and he wants to kill grandma too! Lovely man!
    Somebody ought to give him swimming lessons and loose track of him in a shark infested area.

    Report Post » De minimus  
  • kestrel27
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:27am

    Gee, we’ve always known the Progressives are totalitarians at heart, now because Obama is their titular leader, they don’t even try and hide it anymore.

    Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 11:02pm

      Why should they try to hide this, everything else is a big “IN YOUR FACE…!!!” to the Constitution, and it’s only the “Little People” protesting,

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • Alan
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:23am

    I’m guessing he means to only enforce this edict against conservatives.

    Report Post »  
  • Eyore
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:22am

    What is so surprising
    The left can‘t win the argument so they have to stop anyone that want’s to argue with them

    And if they can’t do it with an executive order then they send the Union thugs into the street
    It is the Progressive way

    Report Post »  
  • NEAF
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:19am

    This will apply to democraps?

    Report Post » NEAF  
  • wingedwolf
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:15am

    This “fool” is the same little worm who has been after all our private retirement money since the clinton administration. And this time he just might get it.

    Report Post » wingedwolf  
    • Eyore
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:25am

      It is not YOUR retirement money
      It has to be used for the good of society, after all it is in your best interest
      You can trust the Progressives, Like Stalin, Mao, Hitler and Obama
      Their just looking out for you

      Report Post »  
  • I_Hate_Libs
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:14am

    Is this news because I already fell stripped thanks to Obummer administration.

    The horror of the Democrat mind.

    Report Post »  
  • Blazing
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:12am

    What about unions disclosing how they are spending the money taken from union member paychecks? A good read on this topic – Betrayal by Linda Chavez.

    Report Post »  
  • Socialism_Is_The_New_Black
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:11am

    They really do get crazier as they age. All that bitterness of not being able to see their utopia realized.

    Report Post »  
  • hidden_lion
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:10am

    “LEFTS FASCISM EXPOSED”

    Funny his name is REICH…..4th Reich at America’s shores.

    Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • Eyore
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:27am

      Hitler was a Leftist
      National Socialist
      The left seems to have disowned him for some reason, Kinda funny since they are still following his policies

      Report Post »  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:09am

    The imp thinks the money is ours,none of the money is ours it’s all borrowed from China.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
  • nomercy63
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:08am

    Hey midget swing on by old George Soros office and have a talk with him about that, while you at it pull the records for AFL-CIO Trumpka and all the backdoor dealing this admin has had since taking office, While we are it lets investigate that Brazil oil deal Obama made and where that money is going!

    Report Post »  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:08am

    .
    I think the folks that think this fool makes sense, spend way too time playing with their own poop…..

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:04am

    .
    This fool can’t balance a checkbook…………

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:12am

      This is a sign a huge effing sign that our Government has grown TOOOOOOOO BIG. And its clearly show how stupid these people are EXECUTIVE ORDERS DON’T EXIST IN THE COINSTITUTION UNLESS IF INVOLVES AND IMMINENT THREAT TO THE NATION.
      For years we have know and Senator Obama came out attacking Bush on executive orders stating the same thing I just posted.

      Report Post »  
    • bikerr
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:16am

      Robert Reich and think tank in the same sentence. Wow! Now that’s funny

      Report Post »  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:19am

      Study the history of Italy under the Mussolini government – this is another step into the direction of facism, just as China has become, and so many European countries are as well…and Mr Obama has declared he wants to rule a nation like China…wonder which one it is?

      Unfortunatly he is right in one regard…by executive fiat, as Mr Obama has come to figure out, he is able to make whatever changes he wishes, maneuvering past congress, and soon will be a dictator in all but name like Mussolini.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • joe conservative
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:20am

      These are amazing times. The government is grabbing more an more power each and every day. We can’t survive 4 more years of this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sRcbiSa0rA

      Report Post » joe conservative  
    • BSdetector
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:27am

      I kind of agree with some of this. You should NOT be able to engage in political donation/support if the gov’t is your source of income. This would obv include UNIONS.
      It should not be done through exec order, but when you recieve more from the govt than you pay out, you have no incentive to rein in spending.

      Report Post » BSdetector  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:30am

      Does the truth ever come out of a Kennedy’s pie-hole? Can’t wait until this family is extinct.

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • BSdetector
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:33am

      This would include many private construction unions as well. I was in the IBEW(electrical division of AFL/CIO) for a few years and most of their work seems to come from govt contracts.

      Report Post » BSdetector  
    • sWampy
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:51am

      I think it’s pretty disgusting that contract companies working for the government, take billions in tax payer $, kick back large % of it to politicians, as bribes or to their election campaigns, so they get given even more tax payer $.

      Report Post »  
    • seeker9
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 9:43am

      Let me guess. Soros is NOT a company.

      Report Post » seeker9  
    • Lotus503
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 10:07am

      Okay…how about doing the same for the labor unions, Mr. Rrrreeeiiiisssscccchhhhaaa? Public employees unions should not have the right to donate to political campaigns, since they are paid with tax payer money. Period.

      Report Post »  
    • Bum thrower
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 10:32am

      You gonna apply this to the ‘public sector’ unions, too? Hmmmmmmmmmm

      Report Post »  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 10:41am

      would this includ ACORN and all its new pseudonyms?
      would it include all the labor unions?
      would it include ge?
      would it include microsoft?
      would it include google?
      would it include facebook?

      or, would it just include oil companies?
      (which the democrat socialist libs are taking over, by the way)
      (Obummer killed domestic drilling in the gulf, while permitting brazil to drill in it!)
      (Obummer and Billary and Soros are up to their collective balls in Petrobras brazilian oil company)
      (before the socialist lib democrats attack on that statement, Soros SOLD his holdings in Petrobras, then he and Obummer issued the statements that Soros was not invovled in it, then Soros immediately bought back into Petrobras) (I did my homework)

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 11:29am

      Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich sounds Jewish? Could it be? Remember the Marxist Jewish connection during every issue. It is the only way that you will ever see the truth.

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • Dakota
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 11:32am

      Ya…not funny…this guy is a Professor at UC Berkeley…same place my son is now going to school. I pray everyday for his strength to battle this kind of lunacy and survive graduation.

      Report Post »  
    • American Soldier (Separated)
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 11:37am

      They shouldn’t engage in political activity because chances are, if they are receiving a large amount of money from the Government, they are PRO- that Government or Administration. Think about it, are they going to bite the hand the feeds them?

      If you receive Government subsidies, which includes WELFARE, you shouldn’t be allowed to engage in political activities. If you receive welfare, are you going to vote for the overspending liberal who promises you more money next year or the conservative who says “go get a job”?

      Solution so we aren’t preventing our citizens from participating in political activities? Stop welfare (social or corporate), subsidies, etc!

      Report Post » American Soldier (Separated)  
    • ClassicalLiberal
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 12:13pm

      Keynesian economics with government control of private property (including business) is fascistic.

      Observing and admiring the Nazi economic program, Keynes wrote in the foreword to the German edition to the General Theory (1936):
      “[T]he theory of output as a whole, which is what the following book purports to provide, is much more easily adapted to the conditions of a totalitarian state, than is the theory of production and distribution of a given output produced under the conditions of free competition and a large measure of laissez-faire.” – John Maynard Keynes
      http://traditionalliberalism.blogspot.com/2010/09/fascism-keynesianism-socialism.html

      Report Post » ClassicalLiberal  
    • moonfish
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 12:38pm

      I guess with this logic, we should also remove a government employee’s ability to vote… due to a conflict of interest. :)

      Report Post » moonfish  
    • Elena2010
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 12:51pm

      Totalitarians!

      We the People need our sovereignty back!

      Report Post » Elena2010  
    • jzs
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 12:57pm

      SWAMPY is the only person who understands what this is about. Do we really want defense contractors, for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way? Or refuse to kill defense contracts that are obsolete or useless for the defense of our country? That’s not fascism (oh jeez!), that’s called conflict of interest. Sometimes, by the cynical, it’s also called “kick backs.”

      Thanks swampy. People can disagree legitimately over policy issues, but what’s amazing is that few people even try to understand what the issues are. They read the headline, then post, without a clue of what is actually being discussed.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 1:56pm

      @JZS re:@Swampy – JZS, did you not read MY post? I made the same argument as you both, however, I included BOTH parties corruption.

      Of course, you probably do not want to see your own hypocrisy, so you conveniently only point to jzs for attacking the republicans alone.

      The fact is, BOTH parties are guilty of this.

      That is what the TEA party is about. End of corruption. Shrink govt back to original intent. Govt with little power has less corruption. More power = more corruption. We need HONEST men/women in office, not more LAWYERS who spend their time subverting the Constitution, and making campaign calls and arranging ‘quid pro quo’ earmarks for campaign contributions.

      I merely point out that it is true for BOTH parties – and, I’m all for ending corporate contributions, BUT, it has to apply across the board. This includes ACORN, GE, Wall Street, Big Oil, AARP, Universities (largest obama donor = University in L.A.)

      I propose, ONLY citizens of the U.S.A can donate to a candidate. Donations go thru a govt clearinghouse that is non-partisan. Tracked there. Recipient does NOT get to know who donated. Donation amounts tracked by clearinghouse. Donations limited to $100 per public office per election cycle. This allows almost everybody to have exactly the same ability to influence pols. Billionaire not better than janitor. Most could afford 100.

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • Patrick in AZ
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 2:51pm

      This is the liberal mentality – you get money from us, so we own you. Do as we say, or we cut you off and let you die. Come to think of it, this is exactly how they treat women & minorities. Do what we say, or we will banish you. Liberals today are the slave masters of yesterday.

      Report Post » Patrick in AZ  
    • docvet
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 4:18pm

      Take your best shot Obamaites! 2012,2012,2012,2012,2012.

      Report Post »  
    • Patrick in AZ
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:15pm

      @JZS – Do we really want defense contractors, for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way?
      —————————————–
      Do we really want labor unions, for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way?

      Do we really want universities, for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way?

      Do we really want scientists who are funded with grants, for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way?

      Do we really want corrupt businesses in Chicago, for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way?

      Do we really want state employees (including governors), for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way?

      Report Post » Patrick in AZ  
    • jzs
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 5:45pm

      Patrick in AZ, so you agree with me?

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Patrick in AZ
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:12pm

      @JZS – No, I don’t. Whether they are contractors or food stamp recipients, I don’t believe that people give up their rights (any of their rights), nor do they become slaves, just because they receive tax money.

      Report Post » Patrick in AZ  
    • Eblaze44
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 6:46pm

      I’m willing IF at the same time unions are treated the same.

      Report Post » Eblaze44  
    • michael48
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 7:01pm

      then welfare, workers comp., unemployeed, GOV. GUMBA seatwarmers shouldn’t be given the right to VOTE…uh…uh…that’s the whole Dem-Wit par-ta…..

      Report Post »  
    • *************************
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:14pm

      Robert Reich — it that a MALEVOLENT DWARF we hear so much about in various and sundry places?

      Report Post » WeDontNeedNoStinkinBadges  
    • jzs
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 8:50pm

      Patrick, corporations aren’t given rights by the Constitution to my knowledge. But in any case, you are suggesting that large companies, even those who main business comes from the government, be allowed to make unlimited political contributions to politicians who will promote their business. That’s a government by and for the rich, rather than a government Of The People, 99% of whom are not rich enough to effect elections outside casting a their single vote.

      And we saw from the last administration what happens, It does NOT promote job growth (job growth under Bush was lower than population growth, even before the recession). No, it makes the rich richer, shrinks the middle class and inflates the number of poor.

      What I find astonishing is the idea people associate “freedom” with the rich owning more and more of this countries wealth.. You’ve been brainwashed, and are voting against your own and your family’s best interest.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 10:37pm

      @Bum thrower
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 10:32am
      You gonna apply this to the ‘public sector’ unions, too? Hmmmmmmmmmm
      ************
      Wouldn’t make an ounce of difference, everyone knows, that lib/frog/progs don’t obey laws anyway, only applies to Repubs, & conservatives. Remember all the libs nominated for office who owed unpaid taxes.

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 10:47pm

      @jzs
      Posted on June 7, 2011 at 12:57pm
      SWAMPY is the only person who understands what this is about. Do we really want defense contractors, for example, funding the campaigns of politicians who are in a position to send even more government business their way? Or refuse to kill defense contracts that are obsolete or useless for the defense of our country? That’s not fascism (oh jeez!), that’s called conflict of interest. Sometimes, by the cynical, it’s also called “kick backs.”
      *************
      …And you know this because? Let‘s face it you’ve read of it going on because of the investigations into the illegal activities and corruption of these companies! IN SHORT THEY’RE ALREADY BREAKING THE LAWS ON THE BOOKS, MAKING NEW LAWS WON’T AFFECT THESE LAWBREAKERS!!! PEOPLE NEED TO REALIZE THAT LAWS ONLY AFFECT THE LAW-ABIDING, THE CORRUPT AND CRIMINALS WILL ALWAYS LOOK FOR WAYS AROUND THEM!!!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • Therightsofbilly
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 12:09am

      @JZS

      Brainwashed? Really? By whom? When? Where? How?
      Certainly not in the public school system, or our prestigious universities.

      And yes, we ALL know that voting for progressives, marxists, socialists, liberals, etc. is in the best interest of our families.

      Pffffttt

      Report Post » Therightsofbilly  
    • jzs
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 12:10am

      Mil Mom, I am inclined to agree. Sometime watch the movie “The Smartest Guys in the Room” about Enron. Big companies, including insurance companies, aren’t your friends. I’m not saying there anything wrong with Capitalism – I’m a proud Capitalist! – but when the love of money, unrestrained by ethics at the top, governs every decision, some people benefit and make their money and the rest of us pay for their greed.

      For all of you who think I’m an idiot (and who am I to disagree?) Capitalism is the only economic system that can grow and thrive long term. This is an oversimplification, but on the “left” side of the scale is communism, which assumes that human motivation is mostly altruistic. That’s a false assumption. Communism has always been and will always be a total failure. In Heaven maybe, but not on Earth. The idea that educated liberals are communists is, just… stupid.

      On the other end of the scale we could have one company, one person, that owns everything in the United States (something Ayn Rand would love). We breath polluted air, drink toxic water, work for nothing because there was no alternative, and have a government whose sole purpose is to support this ultimate capitalist. And the, according to some we’d be free.

      The best solution is somewhere in between those two extremes. If you believe in the “most good for the most people”, you tend to be on the left politically. I can’t speak for anyone else.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Therightsofbilly
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 12:22am

      @JZS

      Thank goodness you can’t speak for anyone else, but only for yourself.

      Report Post » Therightsofbilly  
    • SonOfaCommunist
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 12:35am

      This guy’s mind is so open to all possibilities that his brain fell out. The more intellectual the less common sense.

      Report Post » SonOfaCommunist  
    • jzs
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 1:00am

      Billy, I like your avatar but I‘d bet you’ve never seen a Marx brothers movie.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • rgranger
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 2:19am

      Strip those on the public dole of their right to vote, and I may just buy into that. Ex-military, police, firemen exempt and those that have gainfully worked for some reasonable amount of time 30-40 years should buy some skin in the game, but if your only contribution to sociality is voting yourself into a workingman’s pocket, your benched.

      Report Post »  
    • foobear
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 5:22am

      He’s an idiot. Federal grantees already have to disclose their political spending and lobbying efforts.

      These laws have been on the books for a long time, actually.

      Report Post » foobear  
    • cemerius
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 10:49am

      add this to include UNIONs? ha ha ha ha THAT will never happen……

      Report Post » cemerius  
    • Therightsofbilly
      Posted on June 8, 2011 at 3:08pm

      @JZS

      Good thing you didn’t actually bet on that.

      I get the feeling you think I’m a youngun.

      I‘ll bet I’m older and wiser than you.

      Report Post » Therightsofbilly  
1 2 3 ... 5

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love