Politics

‘Liberal Ladies’ Group Holding Sex Strike: ‘If Our Reproductive Choices Are Denied, So Are Yours’

Liberal Ladies Who lUnch Call for Sex Strike: If Our Reproductive Rights Are Denied, So Are Yours

(Photo: Facebook Group 'Access Denied Sex Strike')

The women’s group “Liberal Ladies Who Lunch” is putting together an unusual event, which it is calling “Access Denied: Sex Strike.”  The event, which is scheduled to take place between April 28 and May 5, features a poster saying “If our reproductive choices are denied, so are yours.”

The group describes their motivations on the event’s Facebook page, saying, “In truth, if we lose our hard won rights to medical care, birth control and pregnancy choice, it won’t only affect women. Men will have to go back to the days when they waited for or paid for sex. This issue impacts all of us. This strike is designed to make that point. Ask your man to speak up for your rights, because when we lose our reproductive choices, so do they.”

The group then gives a somewhat entertaining history of “sex strikes,” ranging from ancient Greece to modern-day Columbia:

In the ancient Greek play Lysistrata, the women of Greece go on a sex strike to end the decades-long Peloponnesian War. Since then, many women around the world have gone on similar sex strikes to keep their men in line.

[...]

[And in Colombia, in 2006] the girlfriends of gang members in one of the country’s most violent cities, Pereira — with a murder rate at the time of 97 per 100,000 people — held a ‘strike of crossed legs,’ giving their men the choice between giving up weapons or giving up sex. ‘We want them to know that violence is not sexy,’ said Jennifer Bayer, an 18-year-old girlfriend of a gang member.

The outcome: In 2010, Pereira’s murder rate dropped by 26.5 percent, the steepest decline in the country.

Unfortunately for the “Liberal Ladies Who Lunch,“ who describe themselves as ”turning America blue, one plate at a time,” the comments section of the event seems to have been overtaken by conservatives.

One commenter put up a picture of Helen Thomas, commenting “Somehow, I’m OK with this.”

Liberal Ladies Who lUnch Call for Sex Strike: If Our Reproductive Rights Are Denied, So Are Yours

(Photo: Facebook Group 'Access Denied Sex Strike')

Other comments included:

Liberal Hypocrisy: Demanding the government stay out of your bedroom and your womb while at the same time demanding they pay for your birth control and abortions

Isn’t using sex as a bargaining tool contradictory with women wanting to be seen as more than just sex objects?

Just a question for the strikers.  Do you support reproductive choice for men?  Should a man be able to tell his pregnant girlfriend he doesn’t want to be a father and give up all responsibility for the child?  Thanks for the response.

Combine this with the Roe Effect and liberals will be sexless AND childless

“Liberal Ladies Who Lunch” has not yet responded to the fact that, among the most recent fifty comments, there doesn‘t seem to be a single one that isn’t mocking.

They have, however, posted a satirical video of two modestly dressed women singing about the Rush Limbaugh controversy:

(H/T: Hot Air)

Comments (707)

1 2 3 ... 21
  • phoenix110
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:36am

    And KEEP them closed!

    Report Post »  
    • chasin23
      Posted on March 27, 2012 at 2:00pm

      then they cant produce anymore commis and libeal women are ugly,and quiet lezzi looking. Rosie O’donnell keep em closed

      Report Post »  
  • 13th Imam
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:35am

    We should send cases and cases of ASPRIN to the Liberal Sexually-Frustrated Ladies who munch, i mean Lunch

    Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • lukerw
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:42am

      Sell your… Contraception & Abortion… STOCKS!

      Report Post » lukerw  
    • conservativejon
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:44am

      telling women to use sex as a tool to get what they want.

      hmmm. who also uses sex to get what they want..hmmmmm

      they are trying to be the american women’s pimps

      Report Post »  
    • hoopsgulch
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:53am

      Do men have sex with liberal women? If so, why?

      Report Post »  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:54am

      The lib women I‘ve seen are pretty icky to look at so I’m guessing no one but the, um, ladies is going to miss out on anything here. After all, don’t they believe men are expendable, useless, and outdated, that‘s it’s sisters doing it for themselves and all that crap? They have zero respect for men so what’s the big deal? No one wants to sleep with a Helen Thomas/Hillary Clinton/Moochelle Obummer acolyte anyway…….

      Report Post » biohazard23  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:57am

      Good, this mean less chance of liberals having babies.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • JRook
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:02pm

      Erica, thanks for covering the crucial story…. LOL

      Report Post »  
    • tgthompson
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:03pm

      Women will not lose their rights to medical care, birth control and pregnancy choice. Just free medical care, birth control and pregnancy choice. You can still get medical care, birth control and pregnancy choice, only you will have to pay for it and not me.

      Report Post » tgthompson  
    • SR1911man
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:08pm

      Wow, they can go a whole 2 days with out sex? Great self control there…

      Report Post » SR1911man  
    • tgthompson
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:09pm

      AMERICANS WITHOUT INSURANCE HAVE ACCESS TO BIRTH CONTROL
      Democrats are loving their manufactured Birth Control War, but facts get in their way.
      Democrats claim that Americans don’t have access to affordable contraception. However, Target and Walmart offer a month’s supply of birth control pills (Sprintec and Tri-Sprintec) at $9 to people who do not have insurance plans covering contraceptives. One more proof that we don’t need Obamacare’s contraception mandate.
      See this web site…. http://factreal.wordpress.com/2012/03/07/9-birth-control-pills-at-target-walmart/

      Report Post » tgthompson  
    • Balpit
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:10pm

      Isn’t withholding sex to get even with your spouse considered abuse?

      Report Post »  
    • The_Jerk
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:10pm

      Proof that women can not take care of themselves. Proof that they are the weaker, dependent, sex.

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:19pm

      If Republicans think this is the way to get the women’s vote this year, I think they are misguided. Saying that use of birth control makes you a slut offends women in general, not just liberal women. That‘s why Rush’s advertisers are bailing on him. You can be sure that liberal women don’t listen to that show.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Maji
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:26pm

      Ahhhh…!
      I’m a capitalist….buy “duracell” stock!

      Report Post »  
    • db321
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:29pm

      Maybe we should take a 2nd look at Sharia Law.

      Report Post » db321  
    • lukerw
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:34pm

      @MAJI
      Lol – ROLF :)

      Report Post » lukerw  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:34pm

      @ jzs

      Again, no one is saying that a woman using birth control is a slut. All Rush was talking about were the numbers given by Sandra Fluke, which would amount to 1000 condoms a year. Only in that context, of spending $3000 on contraception could a conclusion of a “slut” be drawn. You are falsely taking out of context what people are saying. Not only that, but you then place the whole republican party to blame for your contextual argument.

      This makes your whole argument false and void at it face value. You are distorting (IE lying) to setup false pretenses to your position by demonizing the opposition. This is not honest debating on your part.

      The issue is that no one, save the person needing the birth control, should be paying for it. Now if the have a significant other or husband, then the burden of paying for such items can be shared by both parties. We simply do not stand for asking the taxpayers to fund the reproductive rights of women. It is their right to have sex, not have sex, and wear protection. However, it is their responsibility to provide themselves with protection and sexual devices. Even if the contraception has certain benefits, it is still their responsibility to bear the burden of cost.

      Sandra Fluke’s argument is an expectation for government interference based on limits in choice from a private institute. One well known when she and her examples choose to go there. And if not, they did not do their studying.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • Dismayed Veteran
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:39pm

      It appears that the members of Liberal Ladies Who Lunch think of themselves as only sex objects to men. Gee, can the men in their lives go 8 full days being cut off?

      Report Post » Dismayed Veteran  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:42pm

      @ JZS

      Just like a signer of a contract is responsible for reading the contract. If they did not read the terms and conditions, it does not absolve them of the terms and conditions. It makes it more sound like buyer remorse.

      Sandra fells that someone should not have to choice a quality education for birth control, but this is real life choices… She, and her examples, are more than able to get the same level (if not better) from other universities like Harvard, Columbia, Princeton, etc… If they are not getting accepted to these prestigious colleges, maybe they should apply themselves more in school work. Or better yet, still go to Georgetown and apply the extra effort to a job to pay for the birth control themselves. They want life absent of choices by having a one size fits all program. Removing religious institutes from education all together, or for a religion to conduct in acts against their dogma.

      You and Sandra are supporting in limiting freedom of people and private industries in deciding the level of care and services they want to offer. No where are we asking for a limitation to the ACCESS of birth control. She and her friends can still get birth control with no prescription from CVS, Walmart, Target, etc… There is no limitation on the access. There is only a limit to whom funds it based on their own views of entitlement.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • proantisocialist
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:48pm

      Maybe we will now see a drop in abortions…

      Report Post » proantisocialist  
    • cosette
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:48pm

      Rassmussen , the polling unit which, in the 08′ election, provided the most accurate polling information in the U.S., is reporting today that 37% of those polled said their views are more like Obamas’ while 53% chose one of the three GOP candidates. It would appear as though the bloom is off the rose for the Marxist Messiah. His divisive actions, carried out by the Eric “my people” Just-us dept., his war on the contributing members of society, and his crony capitalism, not to mention the insensitivity towards the people made apparent by his and his mates prolific spending on jaunts about the globe, have all served to reveal his true agenda. When Obama said “fundamental change” he meant total destruction. Hopefully his departure nears, pray for that day.

      Report Post »  
    • SpankDaMonkey
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:53pm

      .
      If their giving up men make sure between April 28 and May 5, Ya’ll lock up your dogs and farm animals….

      Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • Marine 1
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:53pm

      Excellent! This is the best form of birth control for liberals there is. See, you had the right to birth control all along and you all were not bright enough to figure it out. Keep up the good work. You’re finally doing something right. This process will also decrease the numbers of STD’s out there.

      In fact, just don’t procreate anymore so that over time your kind will eventually die off and the world will be a much happier place.

      You Liberal Ladies Who Lunch are idiots and we appreciate that fact.

      Report Post »  
    • trolltrainer
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:55pm

      Johnny,

      Why are you spending all that time on JZS? He/she/it is not that stupid, anyone that would put such a ridiculous spin on the situation is obviously just trolling for response. You sure fed him!

      Report Post »  
    • Mr Galt
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:59pm

      @HOOPSGULCH

      Hmmm. It depends on how one defines “man” and “woman”. Within the Prog lexicon, these terms are not at all clear.

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:10pm

      Sorry Johnny but you’re confused. Ms. Fluke wasn’t even talking about sex. She was talking about the use of hormones to treat polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, amenorrhea, dismenorrea, lowering the risk of endometrial or ovarian cancer and other medical uses for hormones.

      Rush brought up the stuff about sex, calling her names, wondering how she could walk, asking who bought condoms for her in the sixth grade, and otherwise speculating about her sex life, even though she said not one word about her sex life in her testimony. He went at it for three days Johnny, please don’t talk about remarks being taken “out of context.” That’s why all or most of his corporate sponsors have dropped his show.

      You’re also seriously confused in with the idea that she was advocating that contraception be paid by the government. Where did you get that absurd idea? Actually insurance companies make more money if the cover contraception as opposed to defraying the costs associated with preganancy and birth.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:17pm

      2.7 Condoms Per Day , Every day for 3 years. Flukes a Slut, a DEMOCRAT SLUT. but that is just oxymoronish.

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • jpclarksville
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:27pm

      @conversaton
      telling women to use sex as a tool to get what they want.

      hmmm. who also uses sex to get what they want..hmmmmm

      they are trying to be the american women’s pimps

      ****Exellent point! Women back in the 1970′s were burning bras for “equal rights” and to not be treated as “sex objects” are now using sex in order to get what they want…love it. It’s so good to see how far women have truly evolved….I’m a woman who was 12 watching all of this on the news and thinking…are you REALLY this stupid? The answer is obviously…YES lol

      Report Post »  
    • Freedom from liberals
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:29pm

      This is good, if they want to cross their legs and not reproduce, that is just fine with me.

      Report Post »  
    • tgthompson
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:30pm

      @JZS
      JZS FLUKE STILL LIED.
      Just is 3 miles from the Georgetown Law campus, Target offers Tri-Sprintec, the generic form of the birth-control pill Ortho Tri-Cyclen. Target sells a month’s supply of this birth control pill for just $9 to individuals without health insurance coverage for the pills.
      Tri-Sprintec is an FDA-approved prescription drug and is the generic version of Ortho Tri-Cyclen. The Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) says it is for: “Prevention of pregnancy.” It is also decrease the risk of ovarian or endometrial cancer and, for some women, to fight acne. That comes to $324 for 3 years not $3000.

      Report Post » tgthompson  
    • jpclarksville
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:31pm

      @jzs
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:19pm
      If Republicans think this is the way to get the women’s vote this year, I think they are misguided. Saying that use of birth control makes you a slut offends women in general, not just liberal women. That‘s why Rush’s advertisers are bailing on him. You can be sure that liberal women don’t listen to that show.
      ****
      Obviously you haven‘t heard from MSNBC and the other white house affiliates that Rush Limbaugh’s sponsors that bailed on him were replaced with other sponsors within 24 hours. Believe it or not, there are businesses waiting in line to advertise with his show. So put yet another “FAIL” in the liberal column.

      Report Post »  
    • mikec711
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:36pm

      It does make a lot of sense. While I know many attractive liberal women (Hollywood is full of them) … most of their significant others are also liberal and therefore fully support the “I play you pay” mentality of free abortions, birth-control, etc. So their target must either be the small % of liberal women who are involved with conservative men, or conservative women. So going out as a liberal group does not make much sense. And as for the Ms. Fluke situation, I would like to start golfing on a much more regular basis, so since that is my leisure-time-activity, I hope y‘all don’t mind my sticking the taxPayer with my greens fees from now on.

      Report Post »  
    • fblair
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:46pm

      This whole discussion has gone way to far with a lot of false claims. The uproar was started when the Administration required that contraceptive pills, etc. be provided “free”. I had nothing to do with providing them, just who should pay for them.

      No one is trying to justify “not allowing women to use contraceptive pills”, the question is “should the government be allowed to require all entities to provide them free.

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 2:15pm

      @ jzs

      Again, you are misinforming… Ovarian Cancer was one of three examples she gave.. Try again. Her first example was a friend who only was embarrassed to find out that BC was not covered, the second was ovarian cancer of a lesbian that wanted to have children later, and the third was a rape victim (which Fluke says Georgetown covers but the student assumed they didn’t).

      Like I did in other articles you commented in, here is the full video to check for yourself:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRC0nsjtKQ

      Please quit lying and misinforming.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 2:26pm

      @ JZS

      Here is a link to the comments I left for you where I breakdown the three examples and arguments to your arguments with exact time points in the video I listed in an above post:
      http://www.theblaze.com/stories/van-susteren-blasts-president-for-keeping-1-million-from-serial-pig-bill-maher-is-that-the-obama-price-tag-for-decency/

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 2:33pm

      @ jzs

      Also, regardless if it will save an insurance company money in paying for other services (actually portions there of) is the right of the insurance company to pick and choose what they cover. Besides, insurance is not a payment plan for medical services. It is coverage of worst case scenarios. They copay regular checkups and other preventative services as it saves money. However, a Church still has a right to restrict services. In their minds, the Church would rather pay the insurance to cover the pregnancy as it is more ethical in their eyes as opposed to covering services that prevent or destroy new life (and do not confuse quality of life as a supplement to actual life), so your argument is null and void as a cost cutting measure.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • starman70
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 2:58pm

      @ JZS

      Ms Fluke didn’t talk about sex? Well she didn’t have to, you could read it into every comment she made about her need for birth control.

      By the way, Rush didn’t lose all his sponsors, only a couple and then one of them called back and wanted to be back as a sponsor. Rush refused and told them he didn’t need such a weak kneed company on his show.

      Rush’s commentary pales when compared to the filth laden diatribes launched by Bill Maher, Keith Olberman and other COMMUNIST leaning commentators from the lamestream media. Maher’s description of Sara Palen using the “C” word is beyond disgusting. You should, if you truly care about civil discourse, listen to the “ShePac” video on U-Tube.

      Report Post »  
    • BSdetector
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:19pm

      A woman who gets paid for sex = prostitute, ******, whatever you want to call it.
      Gotta admire a woman with such high aspirations!

      Report Post » BSdetector  
    • little big man
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:20pm

      That’s ok. that’s why God gave us Two hands. we don’t have to listen to you b.i.t.c.h afterwards.

      Report Post » little big man  
    • Twobyfour
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:24pm

      Fortunately, I am not married to a librul woman. If I were, I’d be looking for a comely scab.

      Report Post » Twobyfour  
    • JohnTwoFeathers
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:34pm

      The picture of Helen Thomas and Nancy Pelosi is enough to make me puke at the thought of having an affair with a Lib-loonie. Thank the Lord for conservitave women. Their all hot.

      Semper Fi

      Report Post »  
    • 3monkeysmomma
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:50pm

      Conservative ladies never have to resort to “withholding” to get what we want.
      We are beautiful, intelligent and charming……and if that fails, we all have guns!

      Report Post » 3monkeysmomma  
    • GoliathOnline
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:51pm

      Liberal Sex Strike? Breaking News; Abortion is at an all time low

      Report Post » GoliathOnline  
    • PoliticalSmackdown {Subscribe & Friend me on YouTube}
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:54pm

      No need nobody wants to have sex with them anyway.. have you seen them?

      Report Post »  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:55pm

      Do men have sex with liberal women? If so, why

      Because the worst sex you ever have is still not bad,the difference is with liberal women they get the morning to go cup of coffee not the tour of morningwood university followed by a nice breakfast.

      Report Post »  
    • flyoverbob
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:56pm

      How can Hillary cut off Bill,she would have to find out where he gets it.
      And wasserman shultz,did you see her chewing his rear for that smile on his face
      Palosi? that old thang hasnt been penetrated in so long it has fused

      Report Post »  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:57pm

      tell those liberal lying slu*s to do it once a month it will cut their contraception cost by 33%.

      Report Post »  
    • ItsNotThatDifficult
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:00pm

      Wow, I actually agree with the liberals, for once! This is historic. Keep the legs closed, ladies… problem solved.

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:09pm

      Johnny, so you are defending Rush Limbaugh‘s comments and you think insurance companies shouldn’t provide birth control even if it improves their profits.

      So to my original point, I don’t think those positions are going to to win votes in the next election.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • 4truth2all
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:09pm

      Me no liberal, me love woman that no liberal. Me have lots of sex with me woman. We happy!

      Report Post »  
    • BlenGeck
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:16pm

      Denial of service? Now I know what “error 404” means. ;) And since when did liberal woman like sex with men? Hmmmm? Keep your knees together liberal gals, your weed wacker clearly needs sharpening.

      Report Post » BlenGeck  
    • Blackhawk1
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:41pm

      jzs

      Johnny, so you are defending Rush Limbaugh‘s comments and you think insurance companies shouldn’t provide birth control even if it improves their profits

      I see you are still lacking any critical thinking skills. Explain how Insurance companies giving away free birth control is improving their profits? That just goes to show why liberals can’t make a profit on talk radio shows like Air America. I notice none of you liberals even mention Maher’s comments about women. Oh that’s right he is a comedian. As a conservative I deem Maher the defacto leader of the Democrat party. There now you have to try and defend his comments about Palin. Rush was just stating what everyone already knows, Liberal women are all sluts, that’s what draws them to becoming Democrats. They can do what they want with no worry about morals or principals.

      Report Post » Blackhawk1  
    • mils
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:58pm

      This only goes to show how stupid these women are….
      They have not been denied anything…it’s all out there..go get it fools. Pills, abortions etc..no one in government is denying them.
      If they can’t pay for their pills or condoms.. welfare insurance will pay for the pills, otherwise they are pitifully cheap..and condoms are cheaper than a big gulp drink at the local convenience store..
      Just another social issue to keep our minds off the crap going on in this country, and shoveled out by our politicians .

      Report Post »  
    • Christianforlife
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:05pm

      Well good lady’s that means less contraseptives and less Abortions. Keep up the good work.

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:26pm

      @ JZS

      Again, you are misinforming and distorting statements. I never said that insurance companies should not cover birth control. WHAT I DID SAY, insurance companies and the private institutes have a right to decide if they should cover it or not. I know it is hard for a progressive like you to get your head around the issue. However, it is the freedom of a company to decide what services and products they offer, or how they want to cover their employees. If someone is a smoker, they are more of a health risk. So, quitting smoking would reduce cost. Should the insurance companies pay for the products to quitting smoking?

      Eating healthy and exercising regularly also helps in improving health and reducing costs. Should insurance companies pay people so they can eat broccoli and antioxidants? Should they copay diet programs, personal health equipment, memberships to spas and fitness centers? Heck, the can also pay for solar panels for homes to cut greenhouse gases from coal burning power companies. This will help reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality and reduce health problems.

      I know it sounds ridiculous, but so is your original argument. It is the personal responsibility of the person to take care of themselves. If they want a copay plan for birth control, do market research and find it. If you want your school to provide it, then go to a school that will cover it – do your research. It is the responsibility of the buyer to research a product

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:39pm

      @ JZS

      My point is simply that this is the sum of choices. If I go to McDonald’s can I order a Whopper? No, they do not offer them. If I go to Burger King, can I order a Quarter Pounder with Cheese? No, even though their motto is “Your Way!”. However, you first must adhere to Burger Kings way and order something on their menu. Even after that, you can have it anyway you want it. They will still charge you for bacon and cheese. But they said my way… My way says it is free! They are limiting my choice…

      No they aren’t, you have a choice. However, the choices are subject to the limitations of their menu and additional costs imposed. You want the extras like bacon and cheese, but ordered something that did not come with the topping? Well, you need to pay for it. Now if you can’t afford it, go out and work and make up the difference. Or alter your choices to cater to your desires. Or go to another restaurant that offers your choices as you like. This is the principle of a free market… Why should colleges, religious institutions, insurance companies and healthcare providers be any different? Nothing is forcing you to work there or go to them.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:39pm

      See, they can do it. If they would use their self control, there would be no abortions in the first place. Keep em’ closed liberal trash.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • Nyle
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:40pm

      Can they make the strike permanent and include all liberal women. Every single one, then we can have less children genetically predisposed to being leftists.

      Report Post »  
    • pavepaws
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:45pm

      Whew…………dodged that one.

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:55pm

      @ JZS

      Now why are you so for the limiting of a company’s right to choose the services and products they offer? Why should government limit their freedom? And if Government can limit their freedoms, what other business can be limited by the government regulation? Can the government force grocery stores to sell only vegetables and organically grown meats? No pastas, carbs, sugars, fats, oils, corn, etc. It is in the stores best interests as the customers will live longer and they will make more money and be more profitable. Where does government have the ability to set limitations in the lives of individuals and private enterprise? What gives them this governance? What qualifies the government above the professionals of their respective fields? Does the government handle any current roles in society which run as efficiently as the business they seek to limit (look at the DMV, construction projects, the post office)? Could they run insurance more efficiently? They can’t balance their own budget currently, what makes you think they can balance a budget on healthcare?

      Realize this, you are setting the precedence that is needed for government to control every part of commerce and individual lives. Limitations given by the government will inevitably become tyrannical (even if you have good leadership today – someday the wrong person may be in power), which is why our founding fathers were bent on limiting the powers of government instead.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • SpeckChaser
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:08pm

      Sorry JZS but you’re confused. The real issue at hand concerns religious liberty and contraception. Should a religious institution be forced to pay for something their religious beliefs oppose, and does the president have the authority to mandate what goods/services private companies will offer.

      Now JZS, you either don’t have insurance, in that case I feel sorry for you, or you don’t understand how insurance works. When you get insurance through your place of employment, say a Catholic hospital, you pay a portion of the cost. The hospital picks up the majority of the tab. It would infringe on their religious liberty to force them to pay for services that oppose there teaching. I know you know this, but assume you couldn’t care less. I know the religious freedom of Christian Religions is not really a concern of yours.

      The second problem with you argument is Presidential mandates. You think that the president has the power to force insurance companies to offer BC. Problem is, under that standard, a future president could force them to NOT offer BC. That would be the standard you would have supported. That is why private companies should decide what products their companies will offer. Simple Isn’t it?

      Report Post » SpeckChaser  
    • Zer0
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:22pm

      I assume Progressive women date effeminate, emasculated, men who probably support their goose-stepping partners….so would not these Progressive women be punishing those on the same side of the issue?

      But then again, this is coming from a group that believes it is still the 1950′s and women had no rights (reproductive or otherwise) until BO got elected….as if birth control has not been available before 2008.

      Report Post »  
    • Servant Of YHVH
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:46pm

      “The event, which is scheduled to take place between April 28 and May 5″
      Now if they would schedule between now and the end of time, we wouldn’t have any babies being born that would turn out to be wacko nutcase liberals. WOOOOHOOOO!!!

      Report Post » Servant Of YHVH  
    • william 123
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:53pm

      Good!! I don’t see an issue with this actually……in my mind it is a good chance of having less liberals born in this country

      Report Post »  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:03pm

      Don‘t think i’ve ever had sex with a Liberal, HMM!!
      and don’t think I have missed anything either, the
      Liberals I do know are Bitc**es, and I don’t associate
      with anyway, let alone have sex with…shiver, BRRR !!
      No Problem Here !!!

      Report Post » MIBUGNU2  
    • vvinyard
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:12pm

      I have never seen soo many DA’s . The health department in most all states provide contraception if needed. Why the heck don’t you direct your concerns to real issues i.e. 68k MUSLIMS crossing the Mexico border in the U.S.????? We have always had to provide photo I.D. when voting or when stopped by the police, what the heck is all this to do about nothing??? DIVERSION DAAAAAAAAAA

      Report Post »  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:21pm

      Will this include ALL Obama voters ???? this could
      be a good thing.. Keep that asprin between your knees..

      Report Post » MIBUGNU2  
    • darkloch
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:52pm

      this will mean that less liberals will be born in the future… you go girls this will help save america and get the liberalism out of here, so thank you and hold that asprin with your knees….

      Report Post »  
    • Nvrat
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:49pm

      Only if the put the tablets between their knees!

      Report Post »  
    • stormcrow53
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:50pm

      @JZS: As usual your limited intellect makes even the simplest concepts sadly too difficult for your Prog brain to comprehend. No one said that using birth control made one a slut or a prostitute. The concept under discussion was whether asking total strangers to pay for the means to enable a woman (certainly not a lady) to indulge in her apparently insatiable and undoubtably exaggerated sexual escapades as a mere faceless object of a dissolute and immoral inability to practice safe and responsible self control falls within the parameters defining customary though somewhat vulgar definitions of character. Indeed,. I suspect Mr. Limbaugh’s assessment was and still is entirely accurate. While I find such an animalistic lifestyle deplorable I do not desire to prohibit such behavior through the authority of the State. Such matters are best dealt with in the spiritual domain through the auspices of the family. Obversely the State has no authority to squander the resources of the community at large on such questionable, mundane ,frivolous and fatuous desires masquerading as sacred rights. As you mature you elevate yourself above the callow and juvenile desire for reckless and irresponsible release and recognize with respect and unconditional love the human being who has chosen you to be the father of her child and she the mother of yours. And with such comprehension one understands the true meaning of marriage as something more exalted than mere copulation. It is all about respect

      Report Post » stormcrow53  
    • jzs
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:59pm

      Hey Speck. I have a few questions for you. Does the government have a right to tell insurance companies that they can‘t drop you insurance simply because you’ve gotten a condition expensive to treat? Do insurance companies have a right to drop you insurance because you’ve given just given birth to a baby with medical problems because that was a “pre-existing condition?” Does the government have a right to tell you you must wear a seatbelt or carry insurance or drive the speed limit? Sure the government has those rights because those laws benefit the average person. There is no general support in this country for screwing the individual and sending them to bankruptcy so that a company can make some tiny additional profit.

      You say that a requirement for insurance company to pay for birth control would “infringe on their [Catholics] religious liberty.” First of all, insurance companies are happy to provide the coverage, no charge. It’s cheaper for them than covering the costs associated with prenatal care and birth. But, no matter, you say this is an infringement of Catholic beliefs. Spec, what Catholics? Most people working in Catholic churches aren’t Catholic. So the Church is forcing their beliefs on them. And the Catholics who work there? They use birth control too. Spec, Catholics and anyone else who wants to avoid and unwanted pregnancy use birth control. So whose religious rights are being violated?

      Report Post » jzs  
    • jzs
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:16pm

      stormcrow53, actually Fluke was talking about the medical uses of hormones for to treat polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, amenorrhea, dismenorrea, lowering the risk of endometrial or ovarian cancer and other medical uses for hormones.

      Rush was the one was talking about her sex life. She didn’t mention a word about that. The sex stuff is from your and Rush’s fertile imagination. What is is it about young, calm, intelligent, attractive women that sets you guys off? I think they threaten your masculinity, such as it it is, and threatens you because you never got an education beyond high school and your best years are behind you.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • tawanda1966
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:23pm

      Irony, liberals going conservative over sex. I teach my children to “abstain.” Isn’t that what they are fighting for now? If I can’t have mine, you can’t have yours. This just makes me laugh!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • Unc68
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:24pm

      I have said for a long time that it is odd the mantra of keeping the government out of the bedroom has been turned into dragging the bedroom into the government. Liberal women have been denying grateful men access for a long time.

      Report Post »  
    • lbyrd26
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:38pm

      I got on this Facebook page and was called an idiot, an a-hole, a fool and other vile names. I didn’t see one conservitive voice thatg called anybody any names. I did however see conservitive women get on there and talk about how people are getting tired of paying for liberal sex and their values. I did ask why they think they jhave the right to make me pay for their secxual daliences. I asked why they want so desperately for the Catholics to pay for their sex, when the Catholics stick to a far more restrictive sex life of their own. I asked if they feel that they should be responsible for their own sex life. I alslo asked why they take a simple issue like tax payers getting tired of having to pay for liberals sexual needs and so desperately trying to spin it into an all out war on women.

      You jwon’t see any of this on their page because at that point they decided that any disagreement with their agenda will be considered as trolls and will be deleted.

      I thought liberals were the ones who fought for free speech? I guess they meant as long as you agree with them. If you disagree they will do anything to shut you down. Probably because you use things like facts and common sense, all they can fight you with is personal attacks and even they can’t use that one for long.

      This group is just another hate group looking for sympathy, so they can keep on doing anything they want at the taxpayers expense.

      Report Post »  
    • SpeckChaser
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:43pm

      JZS

      On second thought you are correct. I see your point about the benefit of the good. Now that you mention it, I think the government should look into the following, you know, for the benefit of the average person.

      The government should dictate what our children should eat, how much salt restaurants put in our food, whether or not men should receive vasectomies, what type and size car we should have and what MPG they will allow, what quality of food is made available for poorest among us.

      You are right. The government, with their unlimited compassion and funds, are much more suited to make choices for us.

      You really don’t get it do you? I don’t guess you care though. As long as you agree with what is determined to “benefit” the average person, then its ok. I’m sure you would support conservatives deciding what “benefits the average person,” you know, because you’re not a hypocrite.

      There are a lot of things I could do to help people. Unfortunately, once my money runs out, so does the help. We currently live in the richest country in the world. You may not know this but I have inside sources that say the Government has a surplus between 500-600 quadrillion. With a bankroll like they can give unlimited assistance to unlimited people and not have to worry about pesky “costs” as I would.

      So yea, totally agree with your plan.

      Report Post » SpeckChaser  
    • marhee9
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:26pm

      I love the inclusion of the Helen Thomas picture. Enough said, go ahead ladies, have at it.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MihTix0uu-4

      Report Post »  
    • johnnylingo
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:51am

      I thought the libs husbands were already soliticing . Remember Al Gores massuse rape attempt, presidential candidate John Edwards whose wife had cancer, Gary catch me if you can hart, and Monicas man who was that guy Bill the 100 dollar draging president. Things will go on as normal for the libs husbands. Another empty threat ..

      Report Post »  
    • Brooke Lorren
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:03am

      Could we make this a permanent strike?

      Report Post »  
    • eliwhit
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 5:58am

      Hello dummies, Thank Goodness we darn sure do not need anymore idiot slut liberals around. Why don’t you extend the date of your poster April 28,2012 to eternity assuring the world of a new generation of people that will not include any of your offspring slut idiots! If I have to pay for your sexcapades it definitely classifies you and your friends as prostitutes/sluts! If the shoe fits out to lunch ladies lace it up and wear it! If thats egg on your face eat it or wipe it off looks like a penal secretion to me!

      Report Post »  
    • Ruler4You
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 9:17am

      Finally! Our prayers are answered!

      Who says there is no God?

      Self extermination of idiots by their own choice “IS” a brutally exquisite remedy. I wish I had thought of it myself.

      More power to you. and may God speed.

      Report Post » Ruler4You  
    • Alastair
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:03pm

      from eHow.com regarding the state of Virginia’s divorce law:

      Constructive abandonment can be grounds for divorce from bed and board even if neither spouse leaves the shared home. If a spouse’s behavior is such that it endangers the mental or physical health of the other, or such that it makes continuing the relationship unbearable without harm to the other party, it can be grounds for divorce from bed and board. WITHHOLDING OF SEX or the destruction of the home life can constitute desertion of the marriage, even if one spouse never physically leaves the other.

      Report Post »  
    • poorrichard09
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:48pm

      I was having a good day reading the news until the photo of Helen Thomas came up AAARRRGH!

      OK lib ladies if you deny your guy sex, no v!brators for you either.

      Report Post »  
    • TexBork
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:49pm

      @hoopsgulch, Well, I guess some men really like hearing, “you’re doing it wrong, you’re doing it wrong, you’re doing it wrong…” But, those women want someone to pay them $1,000 @ year to nag at those guys. I could imagine the Fluker nagging during coitis like that.

      Report Post » TexBork  
    • Kankokage
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:50pm

      Wag the Pill.

      A war on women that only exists in the media. And JZS, the easiest way to force an evil upon a people is to take baby steps with a “righteous” cause. In this case, the cause is “women’s health involving birth control not taken for birth control”, and the evil is “the elimination of the 1st amendment”. Look at the big picture instead of trying to distract everyone with the meaningless minutia.

      Report Post » Kankokage  
    • vtxphantom
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:26pm

      Less sex in the liberal community equals fewer liberal babies. That is ok with me.

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:53pm

      @ jzs

      Also, the price of insurance that will cover these conditions are quite expensive. That is why there is charities and community (IE Church) that exist to help in these areas.

      Does the government have a right to tell you must wear a seatbelt or carry insurance or drive the speed limit?
      This is not set by the Federal Government, these are laws at the state level. Last time I saw, In the 10th Amendment the Constitution stated:
      “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people

      As to which Catholics believe that contraception should not be used? All do (if they are good Catholics and believe the Pope is the divine link to God)!
      http://www.catholic.com/tracts/birth-control

      In 1968, Pope Paul VI issued his landmark encyclical letter Humanae Vitae (Latin, “Human Life”), which reemphasized the Church’s constant teaching that it is always intrinsically wrong to use contraception to prevent new human beings from coming into existence.

      Because the pope said it, it is the church’s position. You can still be a Catholic and not believe what the Pope says, but it would living in sin. However, the Catholic tradition of anti-contraception goes before this letter. It is Protestants that changed after 1930. Even Martin Luther (Lutheran founder) was against contraception.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • aussie trevor
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 8:23pm

      Dictionary
      pros·ti·tu·tion
      noun
      1. The act or practice of engaging in sexual intercourse for money or favour.

      Report Post »  
    • jerimia
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:49pm

      “reproductive choices”? really recreation !

      Report Post » jerimia  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 5:20am

      Don’t think too many men will be missing sex with hags and old bags!

      Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 5:58am

      Men will have to go back to the days when they waited for or paid for sex. This issue impacts all of us.
      ______________________

      Haha… what a laugh. They forget there’s a thing called “self serve”

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • Fireguarding
      Posted on March 15, 2012 at 12:53am

      Is Sandra Fluke participating? That is all…

      Report Post »  
  • Cemetery
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:35am

    Liberals reproducing is a bad thing how?

    Report Post » Cemetery  
    • Cemetery
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:40am

      Sorry liberals ‘not’ reproducing is a bad thing how? Oh never mind.

      Report Post » Cemetery  
    • SR1911man
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:45am

      Ha ha!

      Report Post » SR1911man  
    • Mike N
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:14pm

      .
      I love this idea . . . let’em withhold sex for a year . . . at the end of that year, when all men have paired up with conservative women, the libbies can turn to lezzies and exterminate their own gene pool.
      .

      Report Post »  
    • chips1
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 10:58pm

      Just to quote Obama, “check the air pressure in your J udy D oll and get more mileage.”

      Report Post »  
  • packa14
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:35am

    I can’t imagine any normal white man that would want to practice pro creation with one of these dirty liberal creepy women, it makes my skin crawl!! the thought makes reason stare!!!

    Report Post » packa14  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:48am

      OMG…When the strike is over on May 6th there will be some fat ugly horny women roaming the streets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Run for your lives or get some paper bags!!!!!!

      Baddoggy  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:24pm

      Someone ask them is that from 4/28/12-5/05/13 because if it just for one week the average guy can do that standing on one hand.

      Report Post »  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:13pm

      Paper or Plastic?

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
  • oldeagle101
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:34am

    Hookers get ready big profits are coming….

    Report Post » oldeagle101  
  • FoeHammer865
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:34am

    Married guys, Married guys with children, or guys with relationships that are longer than 1 year, are highly used to going a single week without sex. Come on ladies. You’ll have to go a Month or more to make this work.

    This screams Seinfeld’s “Master of My Domain” episode. Elaine didn’t win if I remember right…. :-)

    Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:43am

      “Married guys, Married guys with children, or guys with relationships that are longer than 1 year, are highly used to going a single week without sex.”

      Wait, what? Gosh, I pity you; never been the case here in any of my long-term relationships.

      Report Post »  
    • trolltrainer
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:56am

      Locked
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:43am

      “Married guys, Married guys with children, or guys with relationships that are longer than 1 year, are highly used to going a single week without sex.”
      —————————————————————
      Wait, what? Gosh, I pity you; never been the case here in any of my long-term relationships.
      —————————————————————-

      Sounds like a bloody mess to me…

      Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:14pm

      @Trolltrainer

      Gotta love the pill, mate. Periods last 3-4 days (if at all, depending on the kind you get).

      Report Post »  
    • goahead.makemyday
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:36pm

      Most guys aren‘t lucky enough that it’s a daily goodnight routine. Last I heard the average was 2-3 time a month.

      Report Post » goahead.makemyday  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 6:08am

      That sounds about right, Goahead.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
  • nottooshabby
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:33am

    Using sex to manipulate others…they have a word for that and it rhymes with 4th and long!

    Anyway, who cares. This is like giving up liver for lent. You’ll never miss it.

    Report Post »  
    • Meyvn
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:37am

      Using sex to manipulate others is Witchcraft. Who cares… Rosy will always be there ;-)

      Report Post » Meyvn  
  • Defeating_Obama_Is_A_Moral_Imperative
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:33am

    How will they make up for the lost revenue of shutting down business for a week?

    Report Post » Defeating_Obama_Is_A_Moral_Imperative  
  • TH30PH1LUS
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:32am

    I suggest that between 28 April through 05 May, every God-fearing believing wife giver her husband as much sexy-time as he can handle.

    Report Post » TH30PH1LUS  
    • 3monkeysmomma
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:01pm

      I wish I could be a fly on your wall when you try and sell that to your wife:
      “Honey, it’s for a good cause! Let’s make a statement!”

      Having said that, good luck! :)

      Report Post » 3monkeysmomma  
    • TH30PH1LUS
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:32pm

      @ 3monkeysmomma

      And how about all those businesses where the ******* men come in all frustrated and annoyed on those days – but the conservative men come in all smiles and happy! Epic!

      Also, ladies, consider how this might inspire benefits for you in the relationship…. it’s a win win situation, folks!

      Report Post » TH30PH1LUS  
  • SYNJUNSMYTHE
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:30am

    MOST Liberal women are very ugly lesbians anyway, you know the butch dykee type…

    Report Post » SYNJUNSMYTHE  
  • Reaganite71
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:28am

    So liberals are going to quit having sex and, by results, produce less liberals?

    Oh! Please punish us more!

    Report Post » Reaganite71  
  • travlman77
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:27am

    So let me get this straight; lib gals are cutting off lib guys or (gals) to make a point with conservitive men.

    BAH HA HA HA HA!!!!

    Report Post » travlman77  
    • lukerw
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:30am

      LOL — And… the Bad Part is?

      Report Post » lukerw  
    • Obama Snake Oil Co
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:38am

      Sort of like Mongo in Blazing Saddles, “don’t shoot em, you’ll just piss em off”. Don’t cut your liberal tree hugger, fish petting libterdial boys off, they will just get blue ball bad!

      Report Post » Obama Snake Oil Co  
    • robinakilt
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:22pm

      Is this evolution? Maybe I will start to believe in it!

      Report Post » robinakilt  
  • RightPolitically
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:26am

    This crap isn’t about reproductive choices (as they put it) or medical rights (no such thing), it’s about having TAXPAYERS on the hook for it. What a bunch of whiny little girls! Life, liberty and the pursuit (not guarantee) of happiness is what you are ENTITLED to. That’s it……. GET OVER YOURSELVES!

    Report Post » RightPolitically  
  • paperpushermj
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:26am

    “Men will have to go back to the days when they waited for or paid for sex”
    .
    Honey trust me on this one….The Sex Was Better Then.

    Report Post » paperpushermj  
    • John_The_Beloved
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:21pm

      Also in today’s society of women who care nothing about you , but rather have the money. Practically already as it is paying for it if you want to get laid

      Report Post » John_The_Beloved  
    • goahead.makemyday
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:38pm

      You didn’t have to wonder if your sharing or not.

      Report Post » goahead.makemyday  
  • Eric_The_Red_State
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:24am

    Woman already hold sex as hostage — it’s called “Marriage”

    Report Post » Eric_The_Red_State  
  • Minonkman
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:22am

    This could backfire on these women, this could open the eyes of there husbands to who they really are. Without sex to round all the corners.

    Report Post » Minonkman  
    • paperpushermj
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:08pm

      If these Females are married to a Male trust me the men where turned into Eunuchs on the Honeymoon.

      Report Post » paperpushermj  
  • cookcountypatriot
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:22am

    c,mon baby its only sex…i promise when were done im leaving..lol……………..

    Report Post » cookcountypatriot  
  • BassChick
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:22am

    Hope this results in fewer babies born into liberal left-wing homes.

    Report Post » BassChick  
    • hi
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:25am

      Actually, it will mean fewer abortions.

      Report Post » hi  
    • SoupSandwich
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:37am

      HI
      Exactly; through their protests they are reducing the import placed on PP… they rarely think through a single protest and any ramifications.

      Report Post »  
  • 10Nov1775
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:21am

    These ‘ladies’ won’t miss what they never had

    Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:51am

      No there are “chubby chasers” and men that are so insecure they think they can’t hold a good looking woman. There are plenty of drug induced brain dead men for them to sleep with…

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
  • grandmaof5
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:21am

    If you are on strike and your man isn’t getting any, he is probably out getting it elsewhere and you only think he is “in line”. What a silly theory!

    Report Post »  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:37am

      Indeed.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • grandmaof5
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:05pm

      Morning, SNOW, hope all is well with you and yours in AZ today. It’s a Chamber of Commerce day in FL and all is well.

      Report Post »  
    • Jenny Lind
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 1:49pm

      They just gave them the best excuse to go elsewhere. They are screwing themselves(no pun intended-well maybe a little bit).

      Report Post »  
    • goahead.makemyday
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:42pm

      I agree GANDMAOF5 the weather is wonderful here. It‘s a nice lower to mid 70’s here with only light cloud cover. Perfect day unless of course your stuck inside working.

      Report Post » goahead.makemyday  
  • BigAlSouth
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:20am

    Ok. I get it. Lib ladies withholding sex until they get their way.

    Who wants to have sex with a Lib anyway?

    Report Post » BigAlSouth  
    • HKS
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:24am

      Thank god for small favors, at least they won’t reproduce.

      Report Post » HKS  
    • Copo
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:27pm

      This is like a liberal holding their breath until they get what they want. “Go ahead, it’ll be a better world without you anyway.”

      Report Post » Copo  
    • M24
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:43pm

      Oh Baby Where’s The Love??

      Report Post »  
  • soitaintso
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:20am

    My grandmother said if society wants women to have the right to abortions, then men have the right to not step up and be a father they should be. Right or wrong…. I think there is some accuracy in her statement, or was it a prediction?

    Report Post »  
    • hi
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:24am

      I know. They think it‘s a woman’s rights issue when it just allows men to assume no responsibility for their actions. It allows men to treat women worse.

      Report Post » hi  
    • Balthazor
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:14pm

      It is an interesting double-standard. If a man fails to provide financial support for his child, he’s a “deadbeat dad”, one of the lowest forms of life on earth, and worthy of all the scorn and disdain that society can muster. But if a woman kills her child via abortion, hey no big thing, that’s her right.

      These liberal women have the gall to cry about their reproductive rights, or supposed lack thereof, while in reality it’s men who have no real reproductive rights whatsoever. If a man wants a baby and the woman says no, there’s no baby. If the woman gets pregnant and the man wants to keep it, well screw you man, my body my choice! If the woman decides to keep the baby and the man doesn’t want to, tough luck buddy, pay up or go to jail. Heck, if the man just wants to have sex and the woman says no, well as we’ve all been told a million times, no means no.

      But then THEY have the nerve to cry about some lack of reproductive rights? Give me a break.

      Report Post » Balthazor  
    • Git-R-Done
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 9:41pm

      There is a lot of accuracy to her statement. Men don’t have to be responsible for the children they father. She either has an abortion or she has the taxpayers pay for her child.

      Report Post »  
  • SoupSandwich
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:19am

    Why not lib ladies that demand free lunch? Lounge lizzards libbing for labia?

    Report Post »  
  • 13th Imam
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:19am

    That photo of Helen was enough to create universal birth control. Altho she probably brought a rise from that Buddhist Ex-Catholic Barbara Johnson

    Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • USAMEDIC3008
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:40am

      MEN
      If your woman is one on strike,
      Put a picture of Helen Thomas up on the wall just above
      the head board of your bed
      A reminder of what a progressive woman will look like in a few years,
      you will think,why take the chance…
      Ive read somewhere ther are 3 to 5 woman to every man now,
      there’s one out there for you

      Report Post » USAMEDIC3008  
    • PaxInVeritate
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 12:44pm

      Indeed! Helen’s mug can make the most seasoned gigolo become impotent for life. The “ladies” who are striking could not out last any man who looks at that fractured façade day and night. She is the ultimate natural contraception.

      Report Post » PaxInVeritate  
    • the wireworker
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 3:14pm

      i don’t know something smells fishy about this hole thing!

      Report Post » the wireworker  
  • hi
    Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:18am

    I can’t wait to read the comments.

    Report Post » hi  
    • paperpushermj
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:37am

      Their good

      Report Post » paperpushermj  
    • lylejk
      Posted on March 12, 2012 at 11:55am

      You just don’t know how I needed this laugh right now. Extreme thankyou to the Blaze for reporting this one. lololol

      :)

      Report Post » lylejk  
1 2 3 ... 21

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love