Politics

Serbian Libertarians? Beck Learns About the ‘Global Tea Party’ Movement Slated to Take Dallas July 26

On Thursday, FreedomWorks will be hosting an event in conjunction with Restoring Love dubbed FreePAC, where conservative and Libertarian leaders from around the country, including Glenn Beck, will rally and advocate for small government and restoring freedom across America. FreedomWorks will also be hosting a grassroots training session for tomorrow’s liberty-driven leaders, providing them with the tools needed to effectively apply small-government principles in their local communities.

In fact, “Tea Party” activists from Great Britain, Italy, Australia, and even as far away as China are slated to attend to learn about America’s founding principles and find out how they can best apply these values and guiding tenets to the framework of their own respective countries.

“I don’t trust politicians…. especially in Europe,” Beck observed.

When their people get hungry, “they always just turn to Fascism or Communism.”

“The Tea Party in America stands for small government,” Beck said during his Monday evening broadcast. “The change has got to come from the people who demand it and want it.”

Beck spoke about his experience in Rome, meeting with the Italian Tea Party. They asked for help in understanding what such a movement stands for, as, for obvious reasons, they didn’t even understand the name: “Tea Party.” Regardless, they hunger for change and the dignity that comes from personal responsibility and liberty.  Beck said we need to find a way to teach people of different cultures, but of like minds, about service, freedom and liberty and that attending FreedomWorks’ FreePAC is a good place for them to start.

It’s quite a challenge to teach people from Socialist countries what it means to not rely on government, yet that is the challenge FreePAC is willing to take on.

On Monday evening, Glenn Beck sat down with Adam Brandon, Executive Vice President of FreedomWorks, to discuss the event and explain why the global Tea Party movement is traveling to Dallas from countries near and far. From young, Libertarian Serbians to Chinese dissidents, people from over 20 different countries will attend FreePAC July 26 to learn about American liberty.

Watch the fascinating interview below:

For more information on Restoring Love, please click here. 

Comments (54)

  • ZBOR41
    Posted on August 22, 2012 at 6:46pm

    Interview with WW2 veteran hero, Art Jibilian
    http://vimeo.com/10542693

    Report Post »  
  • ZBOR41
    Posted on August 22, 2012 at 6:07pm

    Serbians know what freedom is read the book the Forgotten 500 by Greggory A Freeman.

    Report Post »  
  • ContinentalArmy
    Posted on July 25, 2012 at 8:18am

    America has to be First and Foremost! Then deal with Foreign Country’s. Keep it focused on America Glenn!! I’m tired of hearing the word Global!! Sounds too damn Socialist to me! I‘m an American and I’ll die an American!

    Report Post »  
  • quarando
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:11pm

    Is this some kind of a joke? Freedom Works (a group formed to push a corporatist and internationalist agenda under the guise of “freedom”), corporate superpacks and a multimillionaire cable TV propagandist are going to teach us about “freedom”. These are the people that work day and night to corrupt our government, push the tax budren onto the middle class, fill television and the airwaves with every kind of moral depravity imaginable.

    Who would listen to these collectivist fools? Glenn Beck isn’t even a libertarian, nor do any of the corporations funding freedom works have a history of promoting true libertarian principles. They are turning libertarianism into another propagandist tool for the corporate-state. This isn’t “people fighting back”. This is the powerful leading people astray so they can’t fight back.

    Report Post »  
  • FatFreedom
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 5:47pm

    @ The Real Enrico

    Did you look at the video clips?

    Report Post »  
  • The-Real-Enrico
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:25am

    I support these type thinking and action if done right. That is if these foreigners are actually willing to listen truly want freedom as described in our constitution (and Biblically) and our values.

    We always can use more voices of freedom.

    Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:32am

      Funny the push-back you’re getting. People like the idea of freedom so long as they get to define the idea. Truly free people tend to freak out the left and the right. Funny how all of the people who wrap themselves in the constitution sure take issue with Libertarians. Why if we didn’t have massive government and politics to argue over what would we do with our time? (sarc)

      Report Post » Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve  
    • DamocleAurelius
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:53am

      @ RIC

      ““ Funny how all of the people who wrap themselves in the constitution sure take issue with Libertarians”

      Because Libertarians like you (you know, the anti Semitic, tin foil hat wearing self righteous conspiracy loons) are more in line with the Articles of the Confederation than the actual constitution. In fact, you Lee Rockwell types like to denounce the Constitution when you aren’t “wrapping yourselves up in it.”

      Report Post »  
    • BSdetector
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 12:08pm

      So DamocleAurelius prefers Communism to the Articles of Confederation… Interesting.

      I prefer The Constitution and choose to align myself with those who will bring us closer to that goal rather than farther away, but you go ahead and work the the progressives and we’ll see who ends up with a better system.

      Report Post » BSdetector  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 12:29pm

      @DamocleAurelius I don’t know what you are trying to get at? I wrap myself with constitution and I’m libertarian and at the same time I work to denounce and fight back against your “you know, the anti Semitic, tin foil hat wearing self righteous conspiracy loons”

      You are acting just as bad as the left lumping us all libertarians as “anti semitic” “loons”. I could call your comment bigoted.

      You sound much like your “self righteous” (“Because Libertarians like you”) detractors.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 12:46pm

      @DamocleAurelius
      Dumb comment.

      Always research your material before you try to present an argument.
      You sound like Brian Ross. Ill-informed hater.

      Report Post »  
    • Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 1:03pm

      @DamocleAurelius

      Hmmm, yeah I guess my post and any posts made on this site by me would lead you to believe I’m an anti-semite. I suppose that I‘m a conspiracy theorist when I say we can’t pay back 16T in debt or the 200T in unfunded liabilities. I think you meant Lew Rockwell unless you think I‘m linked to the Lee Rockwell Farmer’s Insurance agent from Wisconsin…maybe he has a tin foil hat too.

      I hope your little tirade makes you feel better. Come on back if you want to discuss liberty in an adult manner.

      Report Post » Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve  
    • SquareHead
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 1:24pm

      Why does not Glen Beck support Ron Paul? Now he is promoting Libertarianism internationally? When he could have been a great influence in promoting Ron Paul, he did not, and now he wan’ts to capitalize on the Ron Paul / Liberty movement?

      Sorry I don’t trust Glenn Beck anymore. I think he is trying to co opt the movement and water it down. He talks about inviting Michelle Malkin to this event!!! SHE IS A NEOCON!

      He does not have any credibility since he never mentions Ron Paul, or Rand Paul, and pretends that they don’t exist, when it is Ron Paul who is the father of the movement back to a smaller government, which did go international in 2008 organically, without a syndicated mouth piece like Glenn Beck, who now pretends that he started the movement…

      Report Post »  
    • SquareHead
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 1:55pm

      Continuing:

      To prove my last point watch the following videos:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3hDdvsCI24

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZEnV_-R-10&feature=BFa&list=PL9E61975B2A6C703A

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyHwXa6aQIs&feature=BFa&list=PL9E61975B2A6C703A

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsmPMOISK64&feature=BFa&list=PL9E61975B2A6C703A

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDRVED30d68&feature=BFa&list=PL9E61975B2A6C703A

      In the end the truth will stand……

      Report Post »  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 3:40pm

      @SquareHead Not to be argumentative but Glenn Beck does in fact continuously mentions Rand Paul. Beck supports advocates for Rand Paul weekly.

      Not as much for Ron Paul. Glenn in the past has defended Ron Paul and even gave him much praise but Beck does dis-agree Ron on some issues and does voice his dis-agreements.

      Is Beck a fake/noecon/rino? No. Is Beck 100% on board with Ron Paul? No.

      Beck isn’t the or a enemy. Just like people who don‘t actually listen or understand allot of Ron Paul’s platform and what he actually advocates allot of people don‘t listen to or understand what Beck’s platform and what he is actually advocating for.

      To many of us Libertarians hear no Ron Paul and support Israel and think neocon. Actually listen to his platform and what he is advocating for.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • FatFreedom
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 4:17pm

      @The Real Enrico

      No I don’t think that Glenn Beck is the enemy. But I do think that he sold out. I have followed him since CNN, and have looked to him as a pioneer. I was exited when he went to Fox, and even more so when he boldly went out and started GBTV. He was moving from your average milk toast conservative talking head, towards someone that actually did research and started to talk about the many things that main stream news wouldn’t. I remember him saying:.. “So maybe Ron Paul has been right all along..” and so on. My guess is that someone got to Glenn, after they saw that GBTV was a success, and he understood that he would end up like Breitbart if he continued the way he did. Alex Jones has been left alone talking about these things, being that he is not nationally syndicated, and he has had guest on to talk about ET’s so he can be written off as “a conspiracy theorist”. But now that so much has surfaced about his stories, and millions are tuning in, I am sure they wish they had given him the Breitbart treatment years ago. If they do it now, his work will go completely viral and it would be bad news for them. When I say They I mean NWO, Bilderbergers, Illumenati, people that control the Federal Reserve etc…

      These are things that Glenn Beck will no longer talk about.. At the same time in 2011, when it became apparent that Ron Paul support has the most momentum, he joined Fox news’s Black Out of positive reporting on the campaign.

      Report Post »  
    • FatFreedom
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 4:33pm

      @ The Real Enrico

      Continuing…

      So we finally have a candidate that has real integrity, that has prophesied the demise of our nation, and who’s ideas and philosophy is so solid that conservatives that disagree results to name calling, instead of mustering arguments against them. (Which they can‘t because history and data supports Ron Paul’s positions)

      Ron Paul stands for the small government, that Rush has been talking about for over 20 years, and that we as small government conservatives have longed for, but now that he is here and the time was right, 95% of people with a national voice that claimed to be a conservative, is more scared of their job, than they are willing to stand up for the constitution and this nation. Rush Limbaugh is a prime example of cowardice. He could do what Glenn Beck has done years ago, but that would have taken courage, so instead he has joined the NWO, and the “R” wing of the Elitist Illuminati and has become their cheerleader. He defended Bush when he violated the constitution every time, for 7 years..

      When you have a voice that reaches millions, you have a duty to do what is right in the same way that a soldier in combat has a duty. In fact your job can make allot bigger difference. But now, most are cowards that (will take the mark), or become a card carrying member if necessary in order to to risk their own skin.

      Glenn might talk about Rand Paul now that the battle is over and his skin won’t be in the

      Report Post »  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 7:27pm

      @FatFreedom I do understand people feeling betrayed by him in some key moments. (like speaking out against Ron Paul when he was starting to lead in the polls) I just dis-agree.

      I still think he is a force of good and only helps our movements. He may not help Ron Paul get elected as president but he helps in every other way even foreign policy if other libertarian listen to Beck advocates for.

      Beck is not perfect no one is. Like any other person I don’t agree with the guy 100% of the time but I dis-agree with with my fellow libertarians that bash and try slander Beck. We are fighting ourselves. We need more voices not less.

      I hear allot of Beck use to speak about Y or Z but he he sold out and doesn’t speak about anymore.

      That accusation is false. Most who claim that just got pissed off with him about something and stop listening to him and throw out false claims.

      Beck to this day has(in his Dallas studio) has full shows dedicated to the FED and not just about auditing it but the need to end it and soon. As it is the one of if not most dangerous threat to our republic. Government intrusion taking away our rights for security etc.

      I find allot of us libertarian acting allot like the “sheeple” on the other side of the coin.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
  • Individualism
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:44am

    there is a difference between tea party and libertarians. one simply wants the budget balanced and a decent currency with perhaps less regulation while the other wants as little goverment as possible in the case that constitution of whatever the country is. But i wonder if Glenn has problem with them not giving a crap about israel and not being for occupying the middle east? he probably doesn’t know that yet about them and than the hate will come out.

    Report Post » Individualism  
  • Tigress1
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:09am

    I don’t like anything with the prefix “Global”. This sounds like a way to corrupt the Tea Party and dilute or CHANGE its meaning. When the Tea Party here in the U.S.A. is able to get America’s act together – then maybe they can think about other countries. It’s waaaaay too early to even consider this “Global” stuff.

    Report Post » Tigress1  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:35am

      “This sounds like a way to corrupt the Tea Party and dilute or CHANGE its meaning.”

      You seem to not even fundamentally understand the what they are doing. It is not for us, it is for them. It could not effect our movement. We would be teaching them not the other way around.

      McDonald’s in England has squid on there menu and in India they do not have any meat on there menu. My point is what their brand is doing over seas will not effect our menu/constitutional goals.

      More freedom people fighting for true freedom will help us fight off the Marxist globalist that you speak of. We will be the one who is selling are brand of freedom and values.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • Tigress1
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:50am

      @The Real Enrico, It sounds all “warm and fuzzy” like ALL “Global” groups, but when you look underneath it’s anything but. Americans like to think that “freedom” is a universal term, but it’s not. “Freedom” under Islam is the “freedom to submit to Allah”, it’s not the same “freedom” that Americans understand. Before the Tea Party could/should go “global” everyone must truly understand the freedom that it represents. Otherwise, we could easily see how the Tea Party could get a bad name. Initially the United Nations sounded “warm and fuzzy” but we see what happened to that “global” organization. Many charities become corrupt once they go “global”. Be careful.

      Report Post » Tigress1  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:08am

      @Tigress1 Yep 100% with you all of that. Allot of these countries and languages don’t even have a word for our definition of freedom. I also agree most of these global groups do not represent our values.

      That is the whole point. This why we as individuals tea party, libertarians and constutitionalist should be teach anybody and everybody who is willing to listen. We need to fight the globalist marxist, globally!

      Think of it as libertarian and US constitutional missionaries.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • Tigress1
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:38am

      @The Real Enrico, I guess as long as it is only educational, and the people only take the ideas back to their country it’s not so bad. Maybe my issue is other countries using the name “TEA Party”? The leftists are trying their best to destroy the image of the TEA Party, and I wouldn’t put it past Marxists, etc. (from other countries), to try to do the same thing in their home countries. We have our hands full here, we can’t take on the whole world!

      Report Post » Tigress1  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 12:11pm

      @Tigress1 That can be a legitimate issue.(defaming the name tea party) I don’t think it would effect us.

      1 As I mentioned before people shouldn’t confuse our group with one a different country just like our local groups state to state county to county.

      2 We herein America are all=ready doing a good enough job defaming our selves. With the growth of fake and sellout groups who already are falling in line with progressives policies and candidates.

      On the other hand the liberal/progressive/global media do like to lump us all together and throw out accusations without merit. We wouldn’t want nazi like statist groups going around calling them selves tea party.

      Education is key. I think because we have our hands full here is why it is even more important to reach out and/or help those who are reaching out to us. We need more voices of reason around the world, not less.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
  • DeOppressoLiber
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 9:26am

    I think it is an Inalienable Rights thing.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

    Report Post »  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:19am

      100% You actually understand. Freedom is not just for Americans. We need everybody we can shouting down these globalist big government bailout happy marxist around the world.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
  • teddrunk
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 9:19am

    How can there be an Italian tea Party, if they don’t understand the term? Libertarians? No thank you, I won’t align with druggies.

    Report Post »  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:16am

      That’s right……. force your beliefs on others……

      I’m not a “druggie” but how is that was going by the way? Have we spent enough tax $ yet and have we thrown enough non-violent offenders in prison?

      Report Post »  
    • BSdetector
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:31am

      Nice try, establishment troll. I hear John McCain calling, it’s time for you to spit-shine his shoes again…

      Report Post » BSdetector  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:56am

      Yeah so let by proxy align with marxist.

      Those damn libertarians and that damn constitution! They all must be on drugs! Right? Communist are okay but Libertarians oooh do I hate them! They’re probably smoking pot right now! Right?

      How dumb can you be?

      Most global entities are align them selves with marxism and not principles of freedom aka capitalism aka libertarianism.

      Wake up buddy. Stand on the side of freedom and up against marxist. Unless you enjoy communism.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:26am

      That‘s one of the more small minded things I’ve read of late. Congrats, here’s your sign.

      Report Post » Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve  
  • WakingSheep
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 9:11am

    I thought Libertarian was a bad word?…..

    Always talking about freedom, less government, and the U.S. Constitution……….

    freaking anarchists!!

    Report Post »  
  • MAX0O1
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 9:01am

    GLENN BECK. The Lord is using him as a tool to help us save ourselves. Pray
    for him,his family,and employe,s all the time.

    Report Post »  
  • justangry
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 8:39am

    I thought the Tea Party was against globalism?

    Report Post » justangry  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:11am

      Agreed but this is not what you insinuate. It not us emulating the globe but rather us influencing the globe to emulated our values and constitution aka freedom from oppression and large government entities.

      This is what we should be doing.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:44am

      I was on a site the other day where the so called “tea-party” were talking about a VP for Romney.

      The name I saw over and over was Leon Panetta. LOL!
      So the tea-party back Romney and now they are talking about Penetta as a VP!
      What a joke…… Panetta just recently talked about the U.N. dictating U.S. military operations! IS THAT CONSTITUTIONAL?

      Report Post »  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:16am

      @ WakingSheep Wow! What a joke. That sounds like a GOP group or a progressive advocacy group.

      What tea party group was this? link? Best way to correct these jokers is to expose and shine some light on them.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:22am

      @The-Real-Enrico
      Sorry I don’t have a link…… I was browsing through many different tea party sites the other day and I didn’t think to save the link….. It was a blog much like the comments here.
      I just couldn’t believe what I was reading! I‘ll try to find if I do I’ll post here this evening.

      Report Post »  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:35am

      @WakingSheep I understand. I do the same. I always forget to save a link to thing of that nature.(interesting forum discussions etc)

      Thanks in advance if you find it.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • justangry
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 5:12pm

      @Enrico, GB has turned a somewhat blind eye to the most egregious violation of our Constitution. He knows the NDAA is blatantly wrong and unconstitutional as he stated in his A West interview. Then the issue was resolved, at least here. Do you think if he took a bigger stand with all his fans the GOP would not have back off their Fascism a bit? How can he be pushing our form of Constitutional government and freedom to the rest of the world without standing up for it here?

      Report Post » justangry  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 8:04pm

      @justangry This is the the most is confused and I understand the the knee jerk reaction. I would say some of this is coming down to strategy and opinion.

      As we know Glenn believe we are at serious risk and danger of infiltrators and foreign threat muslim extremist who are cooperating with marxist, communist etc. The allot of the people who understand and is standing up are at this at has also sold us out on our freedoms.

      Both are very important. Some I think Beck is not shouting down people like Allen West because he is one of the only people who understand the seriousness of the issue. If you remember Beck and crew were singing West for president songs until West come out in support of NDAA bill.

      Now you can’t find Beck saying anything about him good or bad. Beck voiced his dis-agreement then almost shunned him.

      Bachmann I think has it right on almost every single issue but she sold out some our freedom because she also understand how serious what is at risk. I agree there is no good excuse to sell our freedoms for security but I know she not a bad actor who is doing this as a ploy to take our rights.Its still wrong just the same and Beck says the same thing.

      Here is what Beck says he wants us to stop fight in all over the war we are in engaged in now. No more nation building, we need to seriously need to reassess who is allies our, stop funding other nations governments and actually name and declare who/what we are fight and who and what is fighting us. (

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • justangry
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 8:45pm

      I don’t really care what people are afraid of, it’s wrong. You‘re basically arguing that they’re cowards. I see little value in saving our country without our freedoms, rights and traditions. Besides, I’m not sure how much of this stuff is nothing more than propaganda. Seems if they were interested in saving us from Islamic extremism they’d halt immigration, student visas, etc from countries that are sympathetic to it. And for the record, RP introduced such legislation. It received no cosponsors. Perhaps everyone should write their representatives and ask why they didn’t support that, but support treating us like prisoners.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 9:27pm

      (Extreme Islam, sharia law, communism, marxism, and statism) These our ideologues that our anti freedom and are evil and should be stated as such. Extreme Islam is the most dangerous of the bunch because of they do not care there own life or safety.”jihad is our way & death by martyrdom is our highest goal” This is how the operate. This is in Iran’s constitution and they say it in their speaches.

      It not crazy to think that they will try to nuke us and/or allied nations because they say they will if and when they can. Without fear of retaliation because “jihad is our way & death by martyrdom is our highest goal”!

      Their stated goal is a return to a caliphate aka so if we would to defend ourselves or retaliate we would look like mass murders and have the whole world turn on the leader of the western leader of the free world. Again not a conspiracy this the stuff their leader actually say.

      Beck’s only problem with Ron Paul is some key issue with his foreign policy. First Ron Paul foreign policy board and advisors are George Soros’s marxist open boarders new world order group people.

      Ron Paul also sees the Islamist as the same as other rational actors like socialist countries who just are thinking for there own well being which is not accurate and potentially dangerous. Ron also seem to some what close to anti semitic truthers when confront by a truther he told her that he could not afford to tell the truth on what believe because he “has too much on his pla

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 9:58pm

      -about. For the record I don’t believe he is anti semitic or racist anything like that but he is surround by them and he never denounces them or speaks out against them. That to some doesn’t make them comfortable with his views.

      About your last post. I agree! You’re 100% right. They are indeed cowards! Only a coward would sellout out their own and others freedom for security. I’m 100% with you and Beck even says the same thing.

      “Seems if they were interested in saving us from Islamic extremism they’d halt immigration, student visas, etc from countries that are sympathetic to it. And for the record, RP introduced such legislation”

      I agree. I think that were politics come in. I think they are not proposing that in fear of seeming anti immigrant just they accuse Ron Paul and us any way. Even more important than that is our boarder where they are flooding in.

      Beck also said the same things. For the record I am not aware of Ron’s legislation(full discloser I am quite young so I don’t have luxury remembering, I have to research ) which I’m sure the likes of Beck would support. Every bill that Ron and Rand write Beck does vocally supports and tells his listeners to try to support them as much as possible writing, calling their officials etc.

      Somethings in Ron Paul’s foreign policy can seem scary knowing what I know. But I dis-agree with Beck on with Paul vs Romney. I don‘t care how scary how Ron Paul’s foreign policy seems Obama’s is purposely sell

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:15pm

      Romney- for a good reason has good chance of losing to Obama!

      I believe Ron Paul would have or would win in a landslide victory larger than Obama did in ‘08 if he lead the GOP ticket. If Obama wins it will be worse than anything Ron Paul can incidentally do.

      Beck and everybody else know Romney is another Bush who is maybe more or less of a progressive. He is just hoping that we can control the house and senate and Romney will pass our law and not veto them. I hope that is true but it is a stretch.

      I was with Beck on Bachmann but there is noway could twist the likes of liberty bashing Santorum and/or Romney as better choices than Ron Paul.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:42pm

      @justangery “I don’t really care what people are afraid of, it’s wrong. You‘re basically arguing that they’re cowards.”

      You are 100% right. Beck says the same thing. If we sell our freedom for security then we deserve nether. This is also repeatedly said on Beck’s show. I 100% agree.

      I understand what and why people like West support these bills but I strongly dis-agree with them and as soon as they have a better candidate run in his seat then I will campaign for his replacement.

      I will until then stand by him when he is right and also criticize him when he is wrong. West is useful in his own way for now but he does need to be replaced in the future.

      My perfect candidate is Rand Paul in my opinion.

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
    • justangry
      Posted on July 25, 2012 at 7:29am

      The first thing I notice is the 4 ideologies that are anti-freedom. You neglect the fifth which is fascism. We agree on much more than we disagree on. FP is always the issue, which I think RP nails it. The biggest question I have for you is where do you get your information on FP from? Keep in mind if you say the media, then you’re basically getting your information from the Council of Foreign Relations, and their most damaging evidence comes from the UN nuclear agency. In the case of the Blaze and GB in every original piece of reporting they‘ve done they’ve used very questionable experts. I‘m not saying they don’t hate us, my position is they‘re militarily weak and really can’t harm us. The US going to war with a ME country is like frog giggin with a 10 guage. It doesn’t keep us safer. It rallies them against us and creates more terrorists, which is the only way they can hit us. Just take some time and check out some of the critics. I’d advise Karen Kwaitkowski and Michael Sheuer.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • The-Real-Enrico
      Posted on July 25, 2012 at 6:58pm

      @justangry True. I forgot to add fascism in there which is right next to statism. Truthfully I think fascism/crony capitalism is I what Obama is try to step on the toes of so he can rally the leftist to call for socialism but I digress.

      Of info and media. I don’t listen to, watch or read from the major media outlets (including Fox etc). I usually listen to libertarian commentators and I read from usually the horses mouth. I don’t like to know what other people think or opinion about some one says. I just want to read,see and hear them for myself in context. When people like Beck make their claims I go there source then I research their source.

      I’ll check out “Karen Kwaitkowski and Michael Sheuer” although I am pretty steadfast in my knowledge & beliefs at this point.

      I don’t about you in your beliefs Christian, Deist, Atheist etc? I come at these things first from history domestic and foreign, ideological and ideological war strategy history & present, culture and then my personal Christian faith. I find that of those things tie together.

      I think I know some of who you question “very questionable experts” . I believe I saw you i the past question people like David Barton and Erick Stackleback(of cbn). They do not have any professional degrees in their fields. Personal that doesn’t matter to me. I don’t trust these college institutions that cloud the truth with marxism.

      I check and verify most of their stuff and they usually check out. Facts are wha

      Report Post » The-Real-Enrico  
  • barber2
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 8:32am

    I would be very careful of these people. One man’s “ libertarian” just might be a European fellow’s anarchist. Given the hidden organization , the years of experience our international “ revolutionaries ” have had, and the fact that they disrespect the American Tea Party as a bunch of dumb rubes, I would be VERY careful about getting on any bus with these guys ! Watch out, Glenn. You are one of their favorite targets !

    Report Post »  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:22am

      Which “guys” do you speak of?

      Libertarians?

      You realize libertarians have a live and let live menality don’t you?
      Blue hair, mohawk, tattoo’s, who cares…..
      Libertarians don’t believe in anarchy but believe in freedom as long as it does not harm another.

      Isn’t that what the Constitution is all about?

      You just love the idea of mob rule as long as your mob is doing the ruling.
      It amazes me how the GOP thinks the DEMS are always wrong and vice versa.

      How about the GOP and the DEMS quit telling people how to live their lives and both parties follow the Constitution.

      Report Post »  
    • Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
      Posted on July 24, 2012 at 11:29am

      Wow, read a book dude. Do you even know what Libertarians believe? Guess what, some of our founding fathers were libertarians…guess which ones. If you really do that exercise, I kinda feel bad for you. Finding out that Thomas Jefferson was a libertarian will be like finding out your brother’s gay for you.

      Report Post » Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on July 24, 2012 at 8:29am

    I believe the final revival of faith across the face of the world, the latter rains bespoken of in the book of Joel are now occuring; we are passing into the greatest of futures the world has ever seen, and for now the actions we each choose to do will decide if the future is of hope and light or death and dark for all of time.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love