Limbaugh Mocks Obama for His Phone Call to Fluke: ‘That Is So Compassionate’
- Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:20pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Sandra Fluke
Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke and popular radio host Rush Limbaugh have found themselves at the center of a media firestorm.
Earlier this afternoon, Fluke appeared on MSNBC, where she told host Andrea Mitchell about a supportive phone call she received from President Barack Obama after radio host Rush Limbaugh maligned her earlier this week. Upon hearing about Obama’s call with the woman, Limbaugh defended himself and railed against the president’s support for Fluke.
In an effort to mock the president, the popular host made a kissing noise with his lips and provided a great deal of commentary on the matter.
“That is so compassionate. What a great guy,” Limbaugh poked. “The president called her to make sure she’s okay. What is she, 30 years old? Thirty years old, student at Georgetown Law who admits to having so much sex she can’t afford it.”
In responding to the president‘s call and to White House Press Secretary Jay Carney’s allegations that the popular host’s attacks on Fluke were “inappropriate,” Limbaugh said that Obama should return the $1 million comedian Bill Maher gave to his Super PAC.
“Will President Obama now give back the $1 million that Bill Maher just gave his super PAC?” Limbaugh asked. “You want to get some of the tapes that Bill Maher has called Sarah Palin? The C word over and over again?”
“Not one person says, ‘Well, did you ever think about maybe backing off the amount of sex you have?’” he continued.
Limbaugh was also bothered by Obama‘s statement that Fluke’s parents should be proud of her. Listen below:
Here’s more:
(H/T: ABC News)
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 705 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 543 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 364 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 358 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 358 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 358 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 364 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 278 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 358 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (550)
bum
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:44pmI‘ll pay for birth control to make sure dumb biotch liberals like this don’t breed
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:06pm2.7 condoms per day, every day for three years. And she pay’s for every condom. What kind of cheap, skinflint guy’s does she attract?? But, I forgot , It’s the land of DC, where everyone else pays the bills,,
Report Post »thegoldman
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:09pmAmen to that, i will help you…
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:10pmI can‘t believe the time that’s been wasted on this stupid subject. Blaze, Rush & Sean…….ENOUGH, already.
Report Post »There are serious problems, and they need discussion. Not this crapola.
gramma b
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:12pmThe Left is trying to make sex the new “opiate of the masses.” As long as those idiots can have all the sex they want, without consequence, they won’t notice or care that all their political, religious, and economic liberty is disappearing. Instead of liberty, they want libertinism.
Report Post »Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:23pm986 times a year…… What a S-L-ut!~ The whole thing sounds like a prelude to progressive forced sterilization.. That’s something the Taxpayers might want to pay for in cases like this trollup..
Report Post »marine249
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:33pmAs the13TH IMAM says 2.7 condoms a day.
Report Post »What kind of buslness is she running on the
side or on her back ?????????
marine249
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:47pmone more thing. say she takes wed, off that 3 a day for 312 days
Report Post »3 a day at 150.00 [CHEAP] each thats 450.00 a day X 312 =
$140,400.00 and NO TAXES WOW
HKS
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:48pmWell, let me see if I got this thing straight. Obama wants the public to pay for birth control for women. So he plants a 30 year old democratic female crony in a college as a student and she says she can’t afford birth control and school at the same time so the tax payers and insurance companies should pay for it so she can have sex. At 30 I would assume that she has done that before and figured out a way. With that said, I would say that Rush could be right and Obama is in the same club.
Report Post »BJC
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:24pmFree birth control so you don’t screw-up and get pregnant.
Free abortion if you screw-up and don’t use your free birth control.
Free childcare, welfare, food stamps, and medical if you screw-up and don’t get your free
abortion.
You democrats sound just like Obama “The Screw-Up”.
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:24pmYou are a great American, Rush! I can hardly wait for Mondays show, being as how the Chevy Volt just went down the toilet!
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:30pmIts not sex crazed slutty law students I hate, its the socialism they espouse that I detest…..
Report Post »Hollywood
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:40pmDoes anyone have a tape record of Obama phoning the family of the border guard who was MURDERED, with a gun provided by the Fast and Furious operation?
Report Post »I hope so, then it will shut those right wing nuts up!
I am SURE it would show how much he cares for those providing security,and DIED for it..
CRICKETS????
The_Jerk
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:41pmShe’s lying. If she‘s a lib there’s a better than even chance that she’s a ****.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:51pmSounds like this gal will be ready for a retread in a couple of years.
Report Post »Freedom from liberals
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:43pmThe one I love was the woman on tape (I forget where it was played) where she was asked about getting a job and her reply was she couldn’t afford it. She was receiving free college education, subsidized housing, food stamps, partially paid day care and welfare assistance. You might as well add free contraception at this point.
Report Post »The land of independence is now the land of dependents. Self responsibility is out the window.
Freedom from liberals
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:46pmThe Battle Hymn of the Republic by Julia Ward Howe goes as follows . . .
Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord:
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;
He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword: His truth is marching on.
I have seen Him in the watch-fires of a hundred circling camps,
They have builded Him an altar in the evening dews and damps;
I can read His righteous sentence by the dim and flaring lamps: His day is marching on.
I have read a fiery gospel writ in burnished rows of steel:
“As ye deal with my contemners, so with you my grace shall deal;
Let the Hero, born of woman, crush the serpent with his heel, Since God is marching on.”
He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
He is sifting out the hearts of men before His judgment-seat:
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer Him! be jubilant, my feet! Our God is marching on.
In the beauty of the lilies Christ was born across the sea,
With a glory in his bosom that transfigures you and me:
As he died to make men holy, let us die to make men free, While God is marching on.
It’s a beautiful song, isn’t it? I never had even read through the whole thing until I found it on the internet. In the song Julia mentions seeing the glory of the Lord – where? In His judgment! She wrote this as she was walking through a Union encampment during the Civil War, and she felt that she could see the glory of the Lord i
Report Post »mutslie
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:50pmh’mmmm…fluke is a disease in sheep kidneys eh‘ I see the likeness with this ’toerag’ Sandra Fluke…what a mob of idiots you are, get a life you people for christsakes’.
Report Post »Freedom from liberals
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:59pmGeorgetown law school tuition is $45k a year, room and board is $20k a year. I want the gov’t to pay for this. I like sex and paying for contraceptives is driving me broke. I want the gov’t to pay for this, or at least health care companies who can pass off the cost in other people’s premiums. I’ve been getting pounded so much, I need a health club pass to stay in shape so I don’t throw my back into traction. Otherwise gov’t will have to pay for my health care costs. I don‘t want my male counterparts to use condoms because it’s not good sex, so I want the insurance companies to pay for STD screening to prevent a possible hefty health insurance cost in the future. I had to spend $20 last month on notebooks and pen and pencils, gov’t needs to reimburse me. This is happening all over campus., I can see it in their faces.My law degree not only teaches me law, it’s a great background for psychology and ESP.
Report Post »Smith523
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:06pmGO RUSH!!! Keep telling the truth!!!
Report Post »newt
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:32pmwho said she bought condoms? answer…rush.
Report Post »he pulled those numbers out of his @$$
smokeysmoke
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:25pmno, its the idea that for the same amount of cash 1000 dollars a year, you can buy a thousand condoms, not to mention most schools already provide condoms at the health centers…. there are already options for women to take what ever birth control they want…. WHY SHOULD I PAY INCREASED 1 healthcare rates, 2 TUITION RATES, cause she wants to use an expensive form of birth control…………. PEOPLE DONT SAY THIS TOPIC IS DUMB…. THAT IS WHY THE PROGRESSIVES CHOOSE IT, BUT IT CAN STILL BE USED LEGALLY TO PROVIDE THE SAME PRECIDENT TO TEAR APART THE CONSITIUTION,, mainly mandate that you pay for someone elses goods through HEALTHCARE TAXES…
Report Post »13th Generation American
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:39pmLimbaugh is such a jerk acting like a teenager bully picking on women because he’s fat, bald an ugly. How does his wife even let that sweaty fat pig……….oh man, I can’t even think it with out being sick.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:40pm@RUSH: Thank you for common sense. Any woman who thinks less of her body than to go sleep
Report Post »around is not a moral person to start with. Whatever happened to common decency? Yup, Rush, you called this one right. If women are low enough to let the world know they skru around, that’s sick enough. These women have no morals.
Now, Rush, I hear some of your advertisers are pulling ads. Good, I will make a list and carry it around with me to make sure I never shop or buy anything from them as well. You have so many
loyal listeners, I hope they all do the same.
GBTVFan_Non_American_Overseas
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:48pmWell, here we have a very busy woman…no wonder why she is 30 years old and still studying at College…
Report Post »packa14
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:28pmHere here!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:33pmHere is Rush Limbaugh, with an audience of 10 million people, calling a private citizen a “slut” for stating the opinion that insurance companies should cover birth control, something the majority of Americans support as well as the majority of Catholics. And he draws her parents into the fray too, trying to shame them as well. Rush is shameless as usual, caring nothing about who he might hurt, and ya gotta think he has a problem with women in general given his frequent misogynistic language, lack of children despite multiple wives, multiple divorces etc. But that’s beside the point.
The fact is that insurance companies are happy to provide birth control pills. Providing prescription birth control to an insurance companies clients is much more profitable than covering the costs of a pregnancy, delivery and subsequent health care costs for the child. If insurance companies determined their prices for group insurance based only on profit margin, they would LOWER prices to provide free contraceptives. These Catholic institution are not “paying for” contraceptive coverage, they are actually helping the insurance companies make more money.
These Catholic institution are not paying extra for contraceptives, the insurance companies are happy to provide contraceptives at no extra cost. Nope, these old white guys are just trying to force their believes on others, including Catholics.
Report Post »Clive
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:41pmits also amazing that so many conservative, christian people, would agree with a man like him, calling her a slut in public.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:41pmNEWT For a good time….go fluke yourself
Report Post »Bikkiboo
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:47pmShe’s getting free college and lots of other things. She’s smart enough to go to law school, but not smart enough to “just say no” or go to Planned Parenthood? (They SAY they do women’s health care and contraceptives, not just abortions! ) What’s next? Does she need someone to feed and dress her too? Is she still a child who can’t take care of herself, or is she an independent adult who solves her own problems and takes responsibility for her own actions? That is…a real AMERICAN!
Report Post »JayCee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:41pmCan’t afford contraception but she pays
Georgetown Law 2011 – 2012 Tuition and Fees Per Semester
http://www.law.georgetown.edu/finaff/studaccts/tuition.html
plus books.
Does she not know that forcing her health plan to cover contraception will also mean the $1895/year premium will be increased? Too stupid for law school.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:48pm$ 16 per month x 36 months law school…. = $ 3000 ? REALLY? DOPE.
Here it is: Contraceptives are available at clinics all across the country. TO demand that the INSURANCE COMPANIES being paid by people who DO not believe in contraception is a total pile.
IT’S about OUR FREEDOM folks. IF people don‘t want to work for companies that don’t pay for Insurance Co’s coverage of Contraception…leave. Go where the company owners don’t care.
BTW: Contraceptive have caused great damage to the female body. They have cause serious mood swings as well, relationship problems and much more. THE ONLY people who want WOMEN to take contraceptives are those trying to control AMERICAN population and increase Female Problems. Just another brick in the wall destroying the natural relationship GOD intended.
HOWEVER, THIS ONE ISSUE is going to INSURE ANYONE BUT OBAMA wins…so keep it up.
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 12:32amRepublicans hate sex and are ashamed of it.
Limbaugh has had 4 wives and no kids yet you let him give you advice on family values.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:33am@CLIVE
And it’s even more amazing that YOU openly mocked the physical appearance of a paralyzed person.
You said he looked like a Star Trek Alien if I remember correctly.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:37amHey JZS,
Why don’t you just com(mi)e straight out and tell us all the real reason you want free birth control for all.
Report Post »freedomofspeech
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 2:38amthing is what are the chances of her offspring (if she has any) would think like her? I have to laugh when Obama calls this woman to encourage her, what if it was his daughters, and it will be soon enough. What will his response be when they say to him “dad, I’m pregnant“ or ”dad, I need more condoms“ or ”dad, I’m going to kill your unborn grandchild, because I don’t want to be burden with a kid now”. He’s ok telling his kid that the tax payers will pay for them to have protected sex? Shame on you Mr. President, for shame.
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 2:54am…a bunch of good american christians aren’t you? the name calling and viciousness directed toward someone you know very little about. didn’t your mommies teach you better? what a bunch of self righteous hypocrites….poo-poo-wee-wee-nanny-nanny-doo-doo
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:47am@MIDWESTHIPPIE
Report Post »Dear Harpie: ***** broke?
conservative510
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:33amMost humans have evolved enough to know that reproducing without having means of support is bad. It’s really sad that they think we need government run birth control. By the way, is that going to stop women from having babies in order to get ‘government assistance’?!!! LOL.
Report Post »Shiroi Raion
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:20amMy mother saw this story and said, “Rush is right. She is s slut and the Liberals are wrong. I don’t find his comment offensive. Only sluts would find it offensive.” I agree with her.
Report Post »By the way… as Rush pointed out… there was virtually no outrage when hundreds of Liberals were calling Sarah Palin and her family all sorts of horrible names. Liberals seem to be so very thoroughly dishonest.
The whole argument that the federal government should force everyone to pay for other people’s personal behavior -whether disgusting or not- is absurd. Where does it end? I want other people to pay for my college. I want people to pay me for retirement, my housing, my food, my activities, my everything… and I‘m willing to destroy my children’s future for my own happiness and I want it all now… Liberals and Progressives are so extremely selfish.
Polwatcher
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:16amJZS
Re: your slanderous remarks about the Catholic Church
It is difficult for me to understand how someone who is apparently educated and perhaps even intelligent can make such a bigoted attack on the Catholic Church and their beliefs. I thought that bigotry was condemned by ********. The Catholic Church has withstood such bigoted attacks for centuries and most probably for 2000 years. I can only imagine what the Romans and their orgy loving crowd said about Christians in the year 100. Christians and their beliefs even became a spectator sport for the citizens at the Colliseum.
All the Catholic Church has said is that they should not be forced to furnish abortion inducing drugs and contraceptives to their workers because it is against their deeply held beliefs to do so. The Catholic Church refuses to be a member of the liberal culture of death. Why is that so hard to understand unless there is some hidden agenda being perpetrated by liberals. The real answer is that Obama and his ******** all have their own religion which is called Marxism. The ******** are trying to force people of all other faiths to follow the precepts of their cult of death. They are doing this through the enforcement of their health care regulations.
Report Post »poorrichard09
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:02amThere’s sure a lot of time and effort going to this dumb ass story-what is the regime doing while we’re distracted? watch the other hand.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:05amWhatsamatta with Glenn that he couldn’t get some of this attention?
The #FlushRush campaign is going well. He’s lost more advertisers than EVER. Misogyny doesn’t play well I guess, oh well.
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:18amSo this election has come down to rubbers, feminine papkins, tampons, bc pills, and deuche bags?
Stephanopolis is the DB, The debates are run by the CIA and the Commie networks… Do any of the commie leftist care about the bankrupting of the Country? Do any of the leftist care about the disaster of disaster’s, the disasterous Oblamer?
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:31amIf i know one thing about Rush we don’t have to worry about him back peddling his comments. And He absoluty right about him Bill Maher….He seems to be able to say anything and when confronted He just say’s…hey I’m a comedian…what did you expect.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:34amShe‘ll have a million dollar offer from Larry Flint by say’s end….that is she waxes that mustache first….
Report Post »So
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:29amDems are pulling the strings on what is controversial and “favorable” during the election year. Obama must get women’s votes. This is all concocted to garner women’s votes. Divisive. Make the other side look “crazy” and “anti women”, all Obama has to do is show up for the win.
Brilliant move for an administration that holds such a low approval rating.
Smoke and mirrors people.
Report Post »TheLiberalsAreComing
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:33amDoes this make Obama our Pimp-n-Chief?
Report Post »jzs
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:52amBilly, your existence is best argument I can think of for birth control. Yuk, yuk, yuk. Sorry for the major slam man, I’m just kidding! Yuk, yuk.
Report Post »Shadowvenger
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 12:59pmAmen to that, bro…..
Report Post »nzkiwi
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:00pmJust when you think that this contraception thing can’t get any sillier, it does.
Twice I’ve thought to myself “well, that must be the end of that”. Now I think “what can possibly be next?”.
Report Post »Rowgue
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:48pmThey don’t have to propagate to be a problem. They will happily become teachers and brainwash your kids all day long every day. As long as we have government funded union run public schools in this country you aren’t doing anything about that.
Report Post »ozzmet31
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 2:26pmI agree with you I‘d pay to just so that liberal bums can’t reproduce they should be fixed as soon as they are discovered they are liberals. Just look at the trash like Rachel Madcow and Ed Schultz and lets not forget the thrill up my leg.
Report Post »Jinglebob
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:00pmIIIII IIII/ III IIII/ IIII/ IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII/ IIII/ II ….stop chaulking on your dorm room wall and start hitting the books.
Report Post »grassroots
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:15pmHey Everybody you think you’re upset over Rush Limbaugh than you must be furious with
Report Post »the other Nations. What do you think they are saying amongst each other. They look down upon the United States and look to us as a country of low moral values, thinking we are not smart enough to produce our own oil and we have let the government trash our constitutional rights. And here people are wanting to boycott Rush. You people are very stupid, stupid, stupid its like their brains have been zapped and turned to much!
BrownWaterVet
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:47pmWith as much sex as this woman is apparently having, perhaps she could ask for a small “donation” from her partner(s). Then she could provide her own pills. Maybe free tubal ligations? I‘m not sure why I am expected to help pay for contraception for some women I’m not even………..having sex with?
Semper Fortis
Report Post »cyclops
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:51pmDon’t pay for it…..let them (liberals) pay for it out of their own pockets……..If she is going to law school….she can afford to pay for it out of her pocket…….she can have all the sex she wants, but she has to pay, herself for the contraceptives……..Not our tax money……Common sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I guess law school teaches people not to think on their two feet………sheeeeeeeshhhhhhhh……
Report Post »outinrightfield
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:31pmHillary Clinton: Obooma did you get the phone number Georgetown law Student, my Billy wants to establish a fund for her.
Report Post »Obooma; I did get it but so did Michele. Two million pieces, but I got my boys working on it. I should be able to use it just before the election. That way at least I will have Billy’s vote in the bag.
outinrightfield
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:33pmDid you mean to call her a bich or a biotech
Report Post »JOCASSEEJO
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:55pmCome on Rush – even Bill Clinton has standards – well maybe. Besides, by the looks of her, I think Hillary would get more “action” with her than slick Willie!!
Report Post »purplewings
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 9:05amDoes anyone here ever remember a time when our government was so idiotic as to be calling a college girl about her sexuality? This is a set-up for Obama to validate his over-riding the Constitution on Freedom of Religion by mandating the Catholic church must supply/pay for things like this that goes against everything they stand for.
Report Post »He probably paid her to say this stupid stuff.
groundhunter
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:42pmOur President is now the “sex in chief.”
Report Post »Our President wants to make sure we all can have sex uninhibited by the cost of contraceptives.
Makes me wonder what happened morality in this country.
I thought we outgrew the sixties.
biohazard23
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:49pmPOTUS = Pimp of the United States
BTW, if they‘re soooooo concerned about women’s health, why are they screeching loudly for contraception instead of coverage for mammograms and pap smears? You know, tests that could actually save a woman’s life…. Just sayin’…..
Report Post »Wyld_goose
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:13pmPerfect example, and more to come from our beloved Obama, “The debate erupted last year when the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended that women under age 50 don’t need routine screening mammography; whereas its earlier stance was in accord with American Cancer Society guidelines suggesting mammography every one to two years for all women age 40 and older.” http://abcnews.go.com/Health/OnCallPlusScreeningAndDiagnosis/mammogram-study-reignites-controversy-breast-cancer-screening/story?id=11758965#.T05dNIcgffs
oops! Because we ought to trust the government attempting to save money on pre screening for women because the ratio of women diagnosed with cancer at that age compared to those that are clean of cancer sounds like a risk-to-pay out ratio from the movie “Fight Club”, more then we ought to trust what the American Cancer Society has to say on the issue.
Report Post »junepug
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:42pmWe are experiencing the same thing the Germans experienced in the 1920s and early 30s. The sex industry was pushed upon the citizens so they would forget and not notice the major problems of inflation, high prices for staples, etc.
Report Post »moonbat666
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:56amYou mean morality like Newt’s? At least B. Clinton stayed with his wife. They must have some kind of strange “agreement.“ But Newton was already skreuing his ”next” wife while he was married to the
Report Post »“current one.” Why don’t we all just stop trying to be the morality police? Nobody’s perfect.
HowTruthHurts
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:41pmA slut is a slut is a slut. Just because her fellow sluts and whores are offended, doesn’t mean Rush is wrong.
Report Post »lisalake
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:11pmLisa LOVES Rush!
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:23pmI think rush blew it. Instead of this being about my freedom not to pay for her to be a skank, he drops the “slut” bomb and once you call “names” you lose. That is all anyone fixates on instead of the point of the argument, Now instead of this being an issue of freedom its just a darn mess. liberals are not that intelligent and the entire argument gets scewed
Report Post »HKS
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:56pmEven by liberal standards, slut is a stretch, professional woman would be a better fit. Does she pay taxes on that?
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:09pm@HorseCrazy
I disagree. A huge part of the problem why we keep losing over and over and over again is because the libs figured out long ago the power of controlling the language. So while there once was a time that sluts were called sluts, well now calling a slut a slut means that you’re misogynistic and hate ALL WOMEN!!! But because the left gained control over the language we find ourselves unable to call a slut a slut, consequently we just have to ignore the fact that the chick even is a slut. We can’t point it out because the left control the language.
It’s just another small way the left tears down our society. All those things that at one time would’ve brought shame and ridicule, now people are expected to just look away lest they be called racists or sexists or bigots.
I get the point you’re making, but I think Rush, and all of us, should call it like we see it, take back the language, and call a slut a slut.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:42amNobody is offended anyway. The indignation on the left is strictly for the consumption of the media. Independents aren‘t paying attention and conservatives think it’s funny. They are playing right into Rush’s hands once again.
Report Post »OneWork
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:41pmFluke revolutionizes philosophy: I think therefore I scam,
Report Post »HowTruthHurts
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:43pmI think therefore I sleep with everyone in my city.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:16pmThe funny thing is, her face is all the birth control she really needs.
Report Post »PAULA J ANDERSON
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:49amVote the bums out.
Report Post »Popp40
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:40pmOkay so while we are distracted with this…what is Obama doing with the other hand?
Report Post »HowTruthHurts
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:43pmPlaying golf….
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:45pmAre you implying Obama is having sex with his other hand??
Report Post »robinakilt
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:08pmLOL no he is to busy screwing us!
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:18pmObama is a “lefty” you know….kinda ironic.
Report Post »Dexter Alarius
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:40pmI think you can afford those pills, Ms Fluke, if you give up one movie a month. Or, two trips to Taco Bell. Or, one “girls’ night out” every 3 months. Fertility isn’t a disease, and the pill isn’t “medicine”. It’s an expense for an activity you want to engage in. Pay for it yourself.
Report Post »Miss Muffin
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:48pmDexter Alarius – you are an idiot!! The pill is used for many other things for women’s health. Try doing some research before spewing out your vile.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:58pmYes the pill is wonderful, it increases the chances of heart attacks, makes women 3x as likely to have blood clots and strokes, makes them gain weight, let’s see what did I miss Ms *******?
Report Post »spirited
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:22pm@SWAMPY:
> breast cancer
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:52pm@Miss Muffin
Oh yeah, that’s why all these women are taking birth control, it’s great health benefits. Did you know, studies have shown that smoking cigarettes can reduce the risk of several diseases, including Parkinson‘s and Alzheimer’s? That being the case, should I start demanding that my cigarettes be provided to me free of charge? Would you believe me if I told you that all those smokers out there are simply trying to reduce their risk of Parkinson’s?
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:56pmOr just go to another school. Hers cost 45k in tuition and 20k room and board. Books another 1k a year and she is asking someone else to pay for her sex? What the hell is going on here? Can’t we just add it to her student loan and she can pay it off later in life when she is married. I am sure her new husband would love to help work that one off?
Report Post »funbunch
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:02pmMiss Muffin – You just don’t get it. Sure, the birth control pill can be prescribed for other uses. In no way does that justify the patient getting it for free. Why on earth should a patient with acne get the birth control pill free when they’d have to pay for other medications to treat their acne?
Report Post »Voice_of_One
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:25pmSwampy You forgot all the Liver problems those pills cause…
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:10pmJust within the last few days, I hear news that “the pill” can cause serious medical problems. Don’t remember what, but it sounded alarming to me. Hardly a week goes by but the law firms announce another drug that has been known to cause serious problems, is suing the drug companies, so sign up for your cut of almost nothing while the law firms are getting millions suing the companies.
Report Post »hbest
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:39pmAfter seeing her, i doubt the veracity of her need for birth control.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:45pmHa ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:51pmPaper bags are free, if she puts one on her head, she might have sex, but I haven’t seen her body yet other than peeks of her flat chest
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:52pmI just figured it out, she looks like Racheal Maddow, you don’t need birth control for that kind of sex
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:59pmCome on, she is a law student, there may be somethings rats won’t do, but there is nothing a lawyer won’t do.
Report Post »bhelmet
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:38pmI believe the Feds should pay for the medication I need to deal with their reaming.
Report Post »AmericanStrega
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:58pmTucks and Preperation H.
Report Post »simplygilly
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:38pmHow about, you want something you can’t afford now, get a part time job like the rest of us.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:49pmAgreed! If she want a different man every night of the week, that’s her personal business. When she
Report Post »asks me to help pay for her birth control, that’s where she crosses the line.
They can claim all the medical reasons they wish, but I see too often the down side of birth control pills.
There are other medications that would work as well. All medications are dangerous. Hardly a week
goes by that they don’t warn you of one medication or another. Right?
Remember when eggs were bad for you, now they are good for you? “They” simply don’t know from one year to the next what is safe or not. Keep knees together is the safest not to get preg.
CatB
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:44amThe PRESS (aka MSM) certainly are running with this .. lots of publicity … for a SLUT … they want Rush’s head .. not going to happen .. truth is still the truth .. even if they don’t like it! BTW this “woman” is 30 years old! My God woman GROW UP!
Report Post »HowTruthHurts
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:38pmWell said Limbaugh!! We need more honest men and women like you!!
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:48pmI’m not a Rush fan, but I must back him today against this slut and the disgusting pimp in the white house. He would look good in a pink Caddy with a velvet fedora
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:23pmLIBTARDIAN-REFUGEE, Like the pimp in Magnum Force?
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:07pmIf you are old enough like Huggy Bear in Starsky and Hutch
Report Post »GBTVFan_Non_American_Overseas
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:08pmHuggy Bear, that’s a classic……I also like Kramer as pimp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_zKCUG20xs
Report Post »pwatkins
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:38pmI love it when Rush tells it like it is. I always pray for his safety though and many others that use their freedom of speech in our left-wing media leaning America. Thanks to all people like Rush, Glenn, Palin. Hannity, and many others that try to get the truth out.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:37pmIf people have to pay for their birth control, then why not the gas to get to the store to buy it? Then why not other things that make it more pleasurable? Liberals are flat out insane! They are as insane and they are bullies and they create more bullies even with their anti-bullying programs which since they have initiated it there are even more bullies in the local school, and the programs don’t even solve bullying, which makes the children who get bullied feel as if the system is failing them.
Report Post »Rebltea
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:04pmyou forgot a few items that We the People should pay for…a home to have sex in as well as bedroom furniture suitable to hold up through repeated use complete with wine of choice and of course cigarettes after…anything I forgot?
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:37pmThere are more people than just Bill Mahar that OBAMMY should consider, as far as giving donations back. Hell, damn near all of his contributors from Hollyweird are card carrying commies! But of course, he won’t. Birds of a feather …
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:37pmLol go Rush! For the Communist Party USA aka Democrats this is not about “women’s health” it is about population control via the school of thought by Thomas Malthus. Malthus was a main inspiration to Margaret Sanger and her starting Planned Parenthood. The DUSSR are so full of crap!
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:29pmCimmunism cannot flourish in a nation‘s population that has large numbers of it’s citizens under the guidance (spiritually, morally) of religion. OIne of the first edicts of the new Soviet Gov many decades ago was to abolish the Orthodox Chruch in Russia. Religion was driven underground, chrucehs burned, many thousands murdered or worked to death is lsave labor camps….Communism cannot co exist with a rightious popoulace…they have to replace that in order to take full control. This is why you are now seeing the assault on religuous freedom…this is the first step in this particular aspect of the agenda.
Report Post »SoundStride
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:37pmThis story just keeps getting better Rush is right bet you this woman gets a cushy government job soon maybe a newly appointed Sex Czar.
Report Post »thejackal
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:36pmThe entitlement mentality of these people is truely appalling. “Waaaaaa I want that, and that and that….. waaaaaa I want it NOW!” Get a job whore, and pay for your own recreation.
Report Post »HowTruthHurts
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:42pmEXACTLY!! If you want to be a whore, well that’s your choice. However, be a whore on your own dime!!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:36pmBarry’s calling the ho to make sure she has enough condoms! You can’t make this stuff up,we have a Jerry Springer mental midget for a president.Barry‘s constantly sticking his big nose in everybody’s business,on the air 24/7 a constant reminder of the mistake so many naive people made in 08.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:40pmI thought he was calling her to get her Rolodex on the girls that have sex 2.74 times a day… I would think that would be a bargaining chip for the administration for Bill Clinton’s support.
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:07pm@ progressiveslayer ..you are correct..I enjoy reading your posts.we see alike on the issues..
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:48pmRemember at the heart of this issue is still the attack against religion and the contraceptive mandate…this side show with Sandra Fluke is a media trick to divert attention from the real issue..Sandra is stupid to participate,she’s now the poster girl for promiscuity …
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:30pmMCDAVE Yes indeed this is but a smokescreen for the regimes real agenda of religious persecution.
Report Post »bhelmet
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:35pmThe reason she cannot afford birth control is Georgetown is OVER $100,000 per year. Go and cry to Georgetown administration – we the taxpayer feel NO sympathy.
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:57pmHow about if Georgetown raises it’s tuition $3000.00?? then she can screw full time, she won‘t even have time to testify she’ll be screwing so much. Then when she graduates and becomes a lawyer, that’s when all that practice of screwing will make her valuable to a law firm. that’s alot of practice of screwing people
Report Post »bhelmet
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:17pmI feel most sorry for all those guys that wake up next to her – “coyote morning”. Nonetheless, I refuse to pay for it. Georgetown lowering rates to $3000/yr – how will they pay those “overinflated” salaries of their beloved “intellectuals” – who have done NOTHING in the “real” world, yet teach our kids what they need to do in the “real” world. How hypocritical again – that seems to be the world of the left. Their brains hurt too much.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:34pmSomeone else’s take…
“For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.”
Report Post »000degrees
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:48pmExactly…..set up and being played. This is the focus of the left’s energies. To function in this society you need to have a certain level of responsibility to go with your freedom. It does not exist on the left.
Report Post »DEFCON4
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:57pm@ time to end thanks for the post,the truth,and bringing me up to speed
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:35pmGloria Alred must be proud of this astro turf “house plant”.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:33pmDisagree with the mandate all you want; Rush is brash and rude. It’s his persona, and what he’s known for. When you need to relapse into calling women sluts and demanding they make porn (like Rush), implying they have sex 2.74 times a day (Bannister and Beck), you’ve gone far beyond the argument at hand and into playground name-calling.
If you believe making insurance companies cover contraceptives is wrong, then make that your argument. Leave the name-calling to those you consider inferior.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:53pmRush owns radio; let’s see a lib succeed they way he has. LOL!
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:59pmyou sound like a slut to me
Report Post »Bush Hating Conervatives make me sick
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:04pmI’m not a big fan of Palin, but where were you when Maher called her a slut. Where were you when, Letterman said between the 7 innings her daughter was getting pregnant. That’s right you liberal Fraud! HYPOCRITE
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:11pm@Tronin,
There‘s no doubt he’s successful, and I never implied he wasn’t. He’s a shock-jock with a conservative bent; he’s famous for crude language. My point was that if you’re assured of your position, you denigrate its legitimacy when you stoop to insults that a second-grader could throw out (or, in the case of Bannister and Beck, when you create a false argument for the express purpose of ridiculing someone and insulting women in general).
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:15pm@Bush
“I’m not a big fan of Palin, but where were you when Maher called her a slut. ”
When was that? A quick search online doesn’t reveal he did (Limbaugh himself said Maher used the “c-word”). Odds are I hadn’t found The Blaze at the time, or I would have commented on the article saying that he’s a crude piece of trash.
A quick search online also doesn’t reveal a Blaze article about the subject. Maybe you can do better and link it?
Report Post »thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:24pmDon’t worry…..STD‘s and other disease will eventually make you sterile and you won’t have to worry about contraceptives are what you are called.
Report Post »williamsocal
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:04pmIf a woman is having sex in which she spends a thousand dollars a year for condoms … (cost about a buck apiece), that would mean she is on average indulging in sex at lease twice a day…. what would you call her? What is a slut? what is a prostitute? I would enjoy hearing the “cute little sex kitten” explain her sexual habits.
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:24pmHe didn’t call women sluts, he called one woman a slut. A woman who’d demonstrated by her own figures that she was a slut. Or at least buying a slut’s worth of contraception.
Or simply LYING about her figures.
Explain to me, why is it that calling one woman a slut is apparently equivalent to calling ALL women sluts? Can you explain that to me?
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:06pm@William
“If a woman is having sex in which she spends a thousand dollars a year for condoms … (cost about a buck apiece)…”
Then we’d have a different story, wouldn’t we? Tell me: when you say you need healthcare, do you only refer to band-aids? No? Why then, when referring to contraceptives (Fluke’s argument), would you assume only condoms are being talked about (Bannister and Beck’s arguments)… especially when her specific examples referred to cases that did not actually involve sex?
Here’s a hint: it’s a strawman argument made up by Bannister and carried by Beck. Contraception and its related services include very much more than just condoms. I‘m surprised you didn’t realize that!
@Balthazor
“Explain to me, why is it that calling one woman a slut is apparently equivalent to calling ALL women sluts? Can you explain that to me?”
He called her in particular a slut, but his comments applied to all women who want their birth control paid through their insurance. Keep in mind, this isn’t the girl getting birth control for free; it’s getting it covered by the insurance that she herself needs to purchase anyway.
“If we are going to pay for your contraceptives and pay for you to have sex, we want something for it. And I’ll tell you what it is. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch.”
From the mouth of the man himself. You want your insurance to cover contraceptives? Show us some porn. You support that?
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:15pmHere’s the official response from the president of Georgetown:
http://www.georgetown.edu/message-civility-public-discourse.html
“In recent days, a law student of Georgetown, Sandra Fluke, offered her testimony regarding the proposed regulations by the Department of Health and Human Services before a group of members of Congress. She was respectful, sincere, and spoke with conviction. She provided a model of civil discourse. This expression of conscience was in the tradition of the deepest values we share as a people. One need not agree with her substantive position to support her right to respectful free expression. And yet, some of those who disagreed with her position – including Rush Limbaugh and commentators throughout the blogosphere and in various other media channels – responded with behavior that can only be described as misogynistic, vitriolic, and a misrepresentation of the position of our student.
…
If we, instead, allow coarseness, anger – even hatred – to stand for civil discourse in America, we violate the sacred trust that has been handed down through the generations beginning with our Founders. The values that hold us together as a people require nothing less than eternal vigilance. This is our moment to stand for the values of civility in our engagement with one another.
Sincerely,
John J. DeGioia
President
Georgetown University”
Now THAT’S how you respond to the matter.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:34pmWell that’s just dandy LOCKED..however…it wasn’t before a formal congressional hearing, it was before a group of congressional democrats Nancy Pelosi cobbled together for an ad hoc meeting. It was not official congressional business, Fluke‘s buffoonery isn’t to be taken seriously. Now that is how you respond to a disingenuous Harvard President, his activist students and a stuff shirt like like LOCKED.
Report Post »phunkejay
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:57pmLocked – you obviously are one of those people who doesn‘t understand Rush’s constant reminders that he is “demonstrating the absurd by being absurd.” His comment about her posting the video of her sex so we could all watch was his way of being just as absurd as her demanding we pay for her contraception. But if you REALLY listened to Rush you would have understood that. Instead, you’re one of those who feeds into the left-leaning medias sensationalized argument diverting sound bites, but in reality have no idea about the whole context of the things to which you react.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:15pm@Avengerk
“wever…it wasn’t before a formal congressional hearing, it was before a group of congressional democrats Nancy Pelosi cobbled together for an ad hoc meeting. It was not official congressional business.”
You’re quite right about the hearings! It was a response to not having a woman able to speak on the first day of the Congressional hearing. If you’re trying to mitigate the impact of her testimony though, I suggest you e-mail the writers of The Blaze; they’ve posted three times the articles about this girl than they have about the hearing itself. Apparently Limbaugh and Beck care about it more than you (and everyone else chatting about it) do!
I‘m not surprised you support Limbaugh’s comments though, Avengerk; your discourse is always peppered with insults :-)
@Phunke
” His comment about her posting the video of her sex so we could all watch was his way of being just as absurd as her demanding we pay for her contraception. ”
I listened to his diatribe, and as I already said: he’s a shock-jock, a Howard Stern cross-bred with Bill Maher who caters to the right. But don’t you think Maher is wrong when he makes his comments? I sure do! Why would you support such filth from someone who claims to be on the conservative side of the aisle?
The Georgetown president is obviously against the mandate, but has the class to keep the discourse polite and honest; Limbaugh, Bannister, and Beck have not done so. Doesn’t that seem wrong?
Report Post »thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:33pmLimbaugh is completely correct. The left hates it when he is correct and they are trying to attack him and the Catholic Church at the same time. Limbaugh and the Catholic Church are not connected but both have figuratively slapped obama in the face over this contraception issue. The government cannot force a religious institution who is against contraceptives to pay for contraception for it’s employees are anyone else. It is clearly against the constitution. I agree with Rush and also agree with his statement that ‘if we pay for her contraceptives then we should be able to see the videos’.
Report Post »Artreri
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:31pmIm not sure “Proud” is the first word that would come to mind if this was my daughter.
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:33pmCome on, let’s be honest about this. Rush is right in this instance: http://www.markamerica.com/2012/03/02/sandra-flukes-irrational-demand/
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:30pmRush Limbaugh is a disgrace to humanity. So sad that Republican leaders don’t have the cojones to publicly denounce Limbaugh the way they would like to do. But they can’t because of fear of backlash from the nut cases who make up their base.
The funny party is that Limbaugh can’t seem to stop this manic, woman-hating riff of his…which is making a lot of Republican leaders uncomfortable. The GOP is in enough trouble as it is and Limbaugh seems hell-bent on driving it off a cliff.
Report Post »HowTruthHurts
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:39pmTranslation: I have no rebuttal so I’m just going to insult him.
Report Post »Intense66
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:44pmBet you are a huge fan of Bill Maher…. UGH! Now that is vile…
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:45pmDear Lumber / Encimon / Monicne / What ever Nom De Plume you are using for the Center for American Progress / Media Matters / Daily KOS, etc. ad nauseum:
Rush has more integrity in his toe nail than you and your progressive, fellow travellers ! He is feared by the left because he is effective! You may try all sorts of ways to silence him but it will never work !
Report Post »Ultimately, he’s just a radio guy. He does not control the Military, the Police, the Courts, the Media, the Congress, or the White House. So have no fear ! On the other hand, your fellow marxists / narcissitic nihilists seem to be buried into those institutions quite well and destroying them from within like all 5th columns do ! Long live Stalin and Mao…..not.
nelbert
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:45pmWhile I wish Limbaugh had avoided this language (name calling like that only gives ammo to the left), I do think this story is being willingly twisted in the media. Ms. Fluke’s claim of $1000/year for contraception is simply absurd. The one case she went into was about using a medication that was normally used as a contraceptive but also could serve as a treatment for an ovarian cyst. Had that been Fluke’s focus, had that been her message, this whole issue wouldn’t be in the news. But that’s exactly why she spoke of contraception – to make this a big news item. Fluke wants this attention, and the left want to tar and feather Limbaugh. I’m sure they would love to silence him now right before the election.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:46pmHOWTRUTHHURTS…one sponsor, Sleep Train, has already pulled its ads from Limbaugh’s show. Others will likely follow…
Except for the loony fringe how do you expect any self-respecting woman to vote Republican in the fall if GOP leaders don’t denounce Limbaugh? You people are so cluless…like children, really.
Report Post »Annika2011
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:56pmHow about denouncing Bill Mahar for joking with his guests about how much
Report Post »Fun it would be to rape Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum, and Michele Bachman.
They howled with laughter!
How about denouncing Bill Clinton for the way he treated Juanita Broderick,
Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, and Linda Tripp. Their lives were DESTROYED
By the president and his media. Linda Tripp was just ‘a friend of’, but she had
to be completely destroyed by the President’s media. Don’t tell me democrats
Care about women. They are attacked and destroyed by the left if they don’t
toe the line. We women are only useful if we parrot the liberal line word for
word. And for pete‘s sake what’s a little rape, harassment or personal destruction.
among progressive ‘friend’s’. Yes, liberal progressives really care about women. NOT.
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:57pmThat’s right, LUMBAR; read the MSNBC talking points. You people lost in liberalism are so sad I bet.
Report Post »amsmith41974
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:58pmWithout the media, the left would never get away with these otherwise transparent amoral arguments. Only the extreme left wing can make an argument in her favor. A critically thinking adult can piece together the components of this speech. She has sex. She wants someone else, a person or group of people that she does not know, to pay for her to have sex. This would make her a prostitute or a government subsidized product/service like ethanol. Limbaugh has no more hatred of women than does the left, when the left made porn using the likeness of Sarah Palin did anyone on that side stand up and say it was wrong?
Report Post »BADDOGGYDESCIPLE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:59pmRight here is another example of “changing the narrative”. Pelosi parades this useful idiot in front of congress to make the claim that contraception cost her 3 grand over 3 years, I doubt it. Rush and others point out the innaccuracy (3,000 condoms over 3 years, average sex 2.7 times per day) insinuating that a woman would have to be quite promiscuous to have sex at that rate. This after the narrative is changed from “the catholic church objects to PAYING for contraception and abortion” to “all conservatives want all forms of contraception banned and Roe v. Wade overturned”. C’mon, which argument do you want to have. WHO EVEN BROUGHT THIS UP IN 2011? YOUR BOY DID BY NOT GIVING THE CATHOLICS ONE OF THE THOUSAND WAIVERS LIKE THE UNIONS AND MCDONALDS RECIEVED. The Catholics didn’t even want a waiver for the whole unconstitutional BS law. They just wanted out of PAYING for the killing of babies in the course of exercising their right of religion. When all of you “progressives” want to have an argument, HAVE AN ARGUMENT, one argument at a time. Changing the claim made by your opponent to enrage the masses is not argument, it’s simply lying. LONG LIVE BREITBART.
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:01pmDumbar; what did Rush say that was un true or hateful ??
Definition of: SLUT
Report Post »Noun:
A slovenly or promiscuous woman.
Synonyms:
trollop – strumpet – harlot – streetwalker – slattern
Lumbar Spine
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:05pmHave any of you actually listened to Limbaugh ranting about this woman? Have you heard the names he’s calling her? This goes beyond a discussion of any legitimate issues. Just listen to the things Limbaugh says on a daily basis and it’s easy to conclude that Limbaugh hates women. Maybe that explains why he’s been married four times…
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:07pmTRONINTHE MORNING…so you think Limbaugh’s woman-hating rants are helpful to the GOP in the fall elections? Clueless…
Report Post »HowTruthHurts
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:13pmI have listened to the discussion & RUSH IS ON POINT !!! That is why liberals keep replaying Rush’s words without replaying the entire dialog. With out the dialog Rush sounds like he’s just bashing women. Within the complete context, it’s CLEAR this chick wants us to pay for her whorish practices.
Report Post »EschatonNow
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:19pmLumbar, the beauty of this medium is that while you can ignore my posts and questions; I can still comment on yours !
Yes, Rush hates stupid, vapid, progressive, marxists, degenerate, and promiscous women ! Wow – you got us all there ! He came up with the term Feminazi about 15 years ago; fitting then as it is now!
Report Post »And why do care about the GOP and the election. By your own standards, you should want him to continue to speak, you should want to use snippets and partial, out of context sound bites to push your Media Matters / White House narrative. We all know your kind but what we don‘t know is how much you are paid to sit in your Mommy’s basement and post replies on the Blaze for Soros and Podesta ?? PS: Have you ever been to a Occupy (OWS) Crapsite ? Atheists Progressives Rule…not.
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:25pm@LUMBAR
Report Post »I’m pretty sure no matter what Rush or any other conservative radio presence says, would turn a lib into a conservative for the GOP. So, Rush is, for the most part; preaching to the choir. However, there are indies out there that are bone-marrow sick of this idiot president and will help decide the election. And most of them are not up for paying for some chick in Georgetown to sew her oats.
Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:00pm“Except for the loony fringe how do you expect any self-respecting woman to vote Republican in the fall if GOP leaders don’t denounce Limbaugh? You people are so cluless…like children, really.”
Well, two thoughts come to mind:
1) Maybe women aren’t a homogeneous hive-mind, and some may actually think for themselves and agree that sluts should be called slut.
1) Maybe women aren’t a homogeneous hive-mind, and some may not actually make contraception and abortion the center of their entire lives.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:18pmBALTHAZOR…liberal women will love Obama’s move. It‘s no secret he’s in need of motivating the liberal base and he’ll shake every tree for every lefty vote in the country. However with most of the country very concerned about government spending and the debt I don’t believe Obama will make any new friends with this blatant endorsement of useless government spending..male or female.
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:28pm@AvengerK: sure, the typical liberal woman is going to go orgasmic over all this. But then again, the typical liberal woman does, apparently, make contraception and abortion the center of their entire lives. And what’s more, the typical liberal woman wasn’t going to vote GOP anyhow.
I just find it incredibly ironic that these liberals are whining about Rush being sexist while in the same breath basically displaying their own belief that ALL women think exactly alike.
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:29pmOne more thing I’d add, my experience has been that women tend to both label sluts as sluts and to dislike said sluts dramatically more than men do. Most men kinda like sluts. :)
Report Post »nolefan2
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:14pmWhy don’t Democrat leaders denounce their spawn that say vile things about conservative women???? Could be that they are afraid of a backlash from their own base.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:15pmBALTHAZOR…they can accuse Limbaugh of whatever they want to…but Bill Maher has a court filing against him by an ex girlfriend who says he threatened her with a hammer. Another girlfriend has offered that he if he’d had his way, she’d have had her head covered and walked 10 paces behind him in the muslim tradition. Consider how many times Maher has used very coarse language about Palin.
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:18pmHey spineless, I’ll bet that my mother, both my sisters, my sister-in-law, and my four nieces will vote against the party of this trampy little knee-spreading slut!!
Report Post »broken1
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 12:30pmHey LUMBAR SPINELESS
Report Post »If you listen to Rush you would know dummy that he often illistrates the absurdity by you lib-nuts by being absurd. You twits cannot stand him because he has his own platform and is very effective against dopes like you this president and his horrid administration. You say that Rush cannot get over his women hating diatribes. What about that little sawed off runt billy maher. The things that he and others like you and him have called Sarah Palin alone should be cause for concern. But since it is Limbaugh the nuts in the media and trolls like you foam at the mouth with selective moral outrage. Is obummy going to give the 1 million dollars back to maher. I doubt it. It is pretty pathetic but then again consider the source.
CatB
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:30pmWhat is “inappropriate,” Mr. Carney … is the President of the United States calling up a 30 year old slut … and condoning her wanting others to pay for her to have SEX!
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:17pmI’m hoping Peelooski gets a gay guy in her “hearings” and he demands viagra for free
Has Obummer forgotten we have DEAD soldiers in Afghanistan???
OMG OMG 2012!!!!
Report Post »HKS
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:29pmPoor little college girl needs laid and can’t afford a pill, what’s one to do but call for help from Obama with your money. Something wrong with this picture.
Report Post »FRED BEAR
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:39pmgives new meaning to the word, Obama economy is helping her to get laid off, (like 3000) a month
Report Post »HKS
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:43pmSorry about that, it has now been reported that she is not a poor little college girl but a 30 year old democratic advocate (plant or the democratic party) working for free stuff for women. IE a freeloader. sorry for the representation. Judge that for what it is.
Report Post »JayCee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:49pmBut she can afford
Georgetown Law Tuition and Fees Per Semester
http://www.law.georgetown.edu/finaff/studaccts/tuition.html
plus books, well over $50K/year.
Report Post »