Entertainment
‘Little Girl With a Dead Squirrel’: Is This ‘Bad Parenting’ or Just a Morbidly Cute Video?
- Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:08am by
Mike Opelka
- Print »
- Email »
This clip is screaming to be introduced by “America‘s Funniest Home Video’s” Tom Bergeron or possibly Dr. Phil as he launches into a show on bad parenting. Either way, it’s a winner.
A young girl is outside playing and sees the family dog kill a squirrel. It doesn’t shock or even frighten the young lady. She wants to show this trophy to her parents, whose first instinct is to run and grab the video camera.
Watch the clip that sparked a very broad reaction at the offices of The Blaze, then take the poll: (Content warning, mom’s language not for broadcast)
Little Girl Plays With Dead Squirrel – Watch more Funny Videos



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (280)
Gavinwcaf
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:36amGood Preperation for her first obortion, what sick parents.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:01pmaaaahahahahahah lol lol
Report Post »lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:15pmWay to jump the gun…
Report Post »Jedrin
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 3:38pmGavinwcaf, sort of sick in the head, is that what you think about all day? People are squirrels and squirrels are people too? I’ll bet life is all gray for you.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:35amToo bad Obama wasn’t there to bring it back to life.
Report Post »attleboro
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:16pmHuh?
Report Post »PrincessLocke
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 9:21amAdd your commentsLOL! “Uhh… uhhh…. are you alright little squirrel? Down in front here…could someone please get this squirrel a glass of water?”
Report Post »dottygoat
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:33amNot a good thing for a little girl to play with a dead animal. What were the parents thinking!
Report Post »MightyBee27
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:32amDid she say “respect”?!
Report Post »the dog wouldn’t even get near it!
Ailene Wright
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:32amChildren shouldn’t play with dead things unless they live in the middle east and play games with goat heads.
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:32amWow! Talk about over reacting people… Geez!
Report Post »RightWrite
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:32amIgnorance is bliss. Does everyone know what Toxoplasmosis is? Your cat is much more dangerous than any dead bird or squirrel. Look it up!
Report Post »biggreenboo
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:24pmForget Toxoplasmosis… Just talking to Sinistamace will make you insides come out your backside.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:29pmBigGreenBoo is a troll sent to try to discredit me with ad hominem attacks.
He is probably a police state goon who would love to be reincarnated as a flesh-eating virus in order to decrease the population.
Report Post »jcannon98188
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:39pm@Sinista
Report Post »Oh how I love you so! You complain about ad hominem and then proceed to spew forth attacks yourself.
Priceless.
Sinista MACE
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 6:54pmI haven’t made any ad hominem attacks.
He has already demonstrated the qualities I described, which are relevant to his irrelevant argument, making my comments not ad hominem, but an inferrence made from his demonstrated ad hominem attacks.
Report Post »USeless
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:31amI dont see what the problem is,that is unless you’re the squirrel…….
Report Post »kdzndogdad
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:29amHoly crap!!!!!!! How can this happen!!!!!! Quick – somebody call child protective services and get this child out of this terrible environment!!!!!
Report Post »VanGrungy
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:11pmbugger off loser…
Just think of the total awesomeness of a child growing up in foster care and group homes..
idiot
Report Post »lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:13pmThumbs up, VanGrungy.
Report Post »biggreenboo
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:18pmI think he/she was joking Van.
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:28am@ IMPEACHBHO….. Being disturbed by seeing a dead animal is a learned trait. How old was the child?? 3? 4?? While I wouldn’t want to see my child handling any dead animal, I hardly think her actions were disturbing. I think this is a non-issue.
Report Post »capecodsully
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:27amI raised a baby squirell with a little kitten bottle and formula, but when I first picked it up off the ground it was loaded with lice. Not for kids .Cute video though.
Report Post »Michael600r
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:24amThe parents should have taken the squrrel away from the chils and explained with dead animals are not toys, it’s disrespectful.
Report Post »Jedrin
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 3:35pmDisrespectful is 1. torture. 2. starvation. 3 bigotry. It is an animal, not a human. Bet you wanted Osama buried with a pig? The little girl was actually being very gentle. Not kicking it around or anything. Disrespect is in the eye of the beholder. When you can love the thing you kill you will understand god a little better. Everything kills, everything dies, animals, people, the sun. Do you bury a fly with a full service? Respect a dead fly? That is what it is, you can not change that.
Report Post »eat-more-bacon-USA
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:24amSomething is definitely wrong here.
Report Post »chronictap77
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 2:29pmDid the kid learn about life and death? Doesn’t look like it to me. And as far as the parents being good, it almost seems to me like they were to high to care about any consequence that could harm their child from this probably parasitic infested wild rodent. Whether any of this is true or not I don’t know, but I could never vote for this couple being good parents, especially considering that most people when knowingly on camera that will circulate the internet tend to try to make their normal behavior a little more paletable for the public.
Report Post »pappy1
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:24amThank you mommy for allowing me to be exposed to rabies.
Report Post »What a good mommy.
REALLY?…..
lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:11pmYep, cured that one, too.
Report Post »bellasbrat
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:14pmYou don’t get exposed to rabies by handling a rabid animal. There has to be fluid-to-fluid contact. (i.e. blood)
Report Post »TheGreyPiper
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:05pmYou mean like blood from a squirrel that has been recently chowed by a dog getting onto the hands and into the eyes and mouth of a 3 year old girl?
Report Post »staythecourse
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:27pmbellasbrat …you are very very wrong about the “blood” thing. Actually it is saliva that can cause transmission of rabies and yes, that child has potentially been exposed to rabies. Just because it was the dog that “caught” the squirrel doesn‘t mean that it doesn’t have rabies. Looking at a dead squirrel gives you no idea of whether or not there was a possible rabies contamination. The only way to determine that is to get a brain biopsy done. In addition to rabies, that little critter could also be harboring deer ticks (yep…they are on other things other than “deer”). These parents were really very stupid and the best thing they can do is to assume the squirrel actually DID have rabies since now no doubt they have destroyed any opportunity to have the squirrel tested.
Report Post »Jedrin
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 3:25pmstaythecourse, sort of over reacting, eh? Looked like a healthy animal to me. Your attitude is why it seems everything is illegal “to save the children”. And all the bigoted remarks throughout this site, the kid is clean and well fed, the parent looked clean, how could anyone know if they are good parents or not from a short video like this. It is an animal that died, not her mother. People and animals die all day long, it wasn’t tortured. God apparently set up a system where physical death is the end product of living, so blame god? Nice dog, didn’t even break the skin, perfect kill. If the mother was a crack ho and yelled at the little girl to put it down and lectured how bad it is to die and kill, then tell her about heaven with a glass pipe in her hand that would be better? Sometime it is better to let people be and look at what you are doing in your life, afraid to go outside for all the disease? Don’t be a bigot. That family is probably better neighbors than most of the hypocrites here.
Report Post »staythecourse
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 5:13pmYour attitude is why it seems everything is illegal “to save the children”.
Jedron:
I think it is you who are “over reacting. I say nothing about the parents being bad parents…I say they are stupid parents. Actually I am a very strong advocate for the rights of parents vs. gov control and have been speaking out strongly against the Fed government declaring that the state now is totally responsible for the “adult formation of children” (take time to read the health care act…it’s all there). What I am saying is that NO ONE SHOULD JUST PICK UP A DEAD ANIMAL SO CASUALLY. Rabies is very much a reality where I live. I spend a significant amount of my time out doors and in fact spent six months walking across this country in the woods and wilderness. I do believe that kids should be allowed to explore their world…play with critters…yes, even snakes…but you better teach them the difference between a black on red and red on black when they identify the snake they are going to be reaching for and the difference between a black racer vs. an indigo.
It is not about keeping kids away from natural curiosity and exploration..it is about teaching them about the world around them and encouraging that exploration…safely. And yes, “physical death is the end product of living”…believe me, I know that more than you could possibly understand…and if you are saying “death is not evil” I agree. “Death” is not something to be feared. Rabies however….
Report Post »staythecourse
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 5:14pmoh, and Jedrin… “looks like a health animal to me”???
The animal is DEAD… how is that healthy? Just asking…
Report Post »Jedrin
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 6:40pmstaythecourse Pardon my French in advance, Touché, I give you that one.
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 1:10am@staythecourse
Oh my lord, really? Deer ticks? You know how many deer ticks I’ve had, and I’ve never come down with whatever hysterically-deadly disease you’re wringing your hands over?
When the girl gets sick, take her to the doctor. Until then, let her expose herself to as many germs as possible. Sterilizing childhood environments leads to superbugs, weak immune systems, and hypersensitive allergies.
Report Post »a_lady_patriot
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:24amGot to love childhood innocence.
Report Post »Lucy Larue
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:25pmA LADY PATRIOT,
Yes…,I agree. The little girl acted in innocence. Who doesn’t love that?
But that is not the issue. It’s the IDIOCY of the parents!
This video was macabre. When she spun around the poor dead squirrel …UGH!
Doesn’t every creature deserve some dignity in death?
If either parent had an ounce of common sense maybe Dad could have videoed Mom explaining to the little girl what happened,then perhaps placing it in a shoebox or whatever and having a small burial ceremony. I believe that would be called instilling a sense of EMPATHY and COMPASSION in your child. Instead this child got a lesson in moral relativism.
Report Post »lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:10pmThat’s the moral equivalent of political correctness.
Report Post »NightWriter
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:26pmAs a child, I gathered up every deceased creature I came across, buried it and said a few words to help it get into Heaven. My kids did the same, and now the grandkids carry on the ‘tradition’.
I’m not even sure where I learned to do this, but somewhere along the line, I must have been taught.
I wonder what would have been said about me and mine… had there been ‘instant’ online video of our ‘wild animal graveyards’?
P.S. Babies – world wide – under 5 years old run around in their diapers/undies… every try to keep clothes on them?
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 1:07am@Lucy Larue
My lord, how do you even make it through life? I suppose my BBQ pork sandwich qualifies as “macabre” too…or swatting flies, we need a lesson on the horrors of fly holocausts lol…wow…some of you people truly are nuts.
Report Post »BrownEyedGirl
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 2:20am@NIGHTWRITER
Holy smokes, my two year-old is potty-training and I literally CANNOT keep a diaper on her. You’re so right!! :)
You gotta pick your battles as a parent. I personally will save my lecturing, angry voice for when my daughter comes home to late, gets bad grades, talks back to me, etc. I can’t get upset at a toddler for being curious about a cute fuzzy animal that is actually letting her pick it up! She’s sweet as can be and I just wanna hug her! After a bath of course ;)
Report Post »Rob
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:23amCan you say Bubonic? B-U-B-O-I-N-C…
Report Post »lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:09pmCan you say CURED THAT ONE? C-U-R-E-D T-H-A-T O-N-E…
Report Post »mocroft
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 5:34pmCured?
“In the U.S., plague cases are rare and relatively isolated; 10 to 20 human cases of plague are reported each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Plague is caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, which lives in rodents, and is transmitted by flea bites.
The fleas feed on wild rodents, such as the rock squirrel in the Southwest and the California ground squirrel in the Pacific states.
Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2011/05/10/first-case-of-bubonic-plague-in-2011-appears-in-new-mexico/#ixzz1MGq66GDU
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 1:04am10 to 20 cases per year, and yet, NOBODY DIES FROM IT.
You see, there’s this thing called modern medicine, and they’ve developed this substance called “antibiotics”.
Report Post »chronictap77
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 12:57pmThe Bubonic Plague is by the bacillus yersinia pestis (this is where the word pestilence is derived) carried by fleas and transmitted normally by rodents. The bacillus is extremely virulent. Laboratory mice die after being infected with just three bacilli – and fleas can disgorge up to 24,000 in one bite. Whilst rats were the most common carriers in medieval times other rodents, such as squirrels , have transmitted the disease in advanced Western countries, such as the USA in recent years. The plague is transmitted by the rodent buy the flea. The disease, when caught this way, travels through the lymph system causing the lymph glands to swell the lymph nodes and discolour and turn a black color – hence the descriptive name Black Death. The areas normally affected are the armpits and the groin. Modern antibiotics have a good chance of combating the disease but there is still a high mortality rate unless treated early. It has a 1-15% mortality rate in treated cases and a 40-60% mortality rate in untreated cases.
Report Post »chronictap77
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 1:02pmThe Pneumonic Plague : Yet again this is the same disease but in this instance is caught by breathing the disease from a contaminated animal or human. It rapidly damages the lungs and results in nearly a 100% mortality rate, even with today’s medical knowledge, if not treated
within the first 24 hours of infection
I would not let my child play with this thing.
Report Post »hochnessmonster
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:22amYeah…I noticed the F Bomb as well as the wife and husband freaking about something or someone seeing them outside. What was that all about? It’s absolutely disgusting!! Not to mention they’re letting their little daughter run around outside in her underwear.
Report Post »travlman77
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:21amSquirrels are just rats with a fuzzy tail and a good PR man.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:20amSquirrels carry diseases and parasites.
I haven’t seen a dog catch a squirrel before…they usually get away easily…
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:31amTrust me.. Dogs catch squirrels ALL THE TIME. Did you notice the kind of dog they had?? Fastest dog in the world? Weren’t they used for hunting rabbits and other small fast rodents in the Middle East?
Report Post »sbeejustsaying
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:43am@ Sinista MACE It’s a greyhound. Sighthound. Very fast!
Report Post »Lee_in_PA
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:20pmOur dog has caught four squirrels, three groundhogs, two possums and several bees. He’s not even a hunting breed, but he’s mighty quick.
Report Post »As for kids being curious, last possum the dog killed the neighborhood childlren wanted to SEE IT please? Who knows why, I would not let them.
lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:06pmHumans carry disease and parasites, too. It’s not as if she was playing with half decomposed remains.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:09pmI have experience only with pit bulls and dobermans.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:14pmBut humans usually don’t carry things like ticks and animal parasites that carry deadly disease.
Animals don’t neccessarily have to be decomposed to transmit disease, especially not rodents. Rodents are notorius for carrying deadly disease, that‘s why they’re considered vermin. Squirrels really are pests. Vermin/varmint/varmit.
Report Post »jeff714
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 3:58pmMy Akita catches squirrels,rabbits and opossums quite frequently!Most dogs can catch them they just won’t.
Report Post »BrownEyedGirl
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 2:15amPeople have diseases and parasites too. Can’t argue with me there! :)
Report Post »Mandors
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:14amHey, anybody pick up the F bomb from the wife at about 1:23?
Kinda creepy though.
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:22amF bomb noted and it sounds like this a regular part of her vocabulary in front of her child.
Report Post »777jenn
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:13pmYes..caught F bomb, and Yes–i bet she uses that filthy lingo all the time. What I did NOT catch was either of these “parents” at LEAST telling her to not put it near her mouth! Mom seemed more concerned about the dog…Losers.
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:13amStupid and irresponsible on so many levels. I hope they only feed her cold sandwiches.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:31amwtfe.
Report Post »LetUsReason
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 3:02pmI‘m not sure what Mevyn’s acronym is supposed to mean, but I suspect I would probably agree. I love all the people on here like, “Well I never!” It’s a cute video. Most children do goofy things when they’re little.
Report Post »walkwithme1966
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 4:46pmAt least they were going to bath her after the “filming” – but I know that my daughter at that age would have been extremely upset with the death of the squirrel. http://wp.me/pYLB7-Y6
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:13amWhen a child is not disturbed seeing the death of an animal – that is disturbing.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:30amIt’s called innocence. No reason to be disturbed unless you already have issues.
Report Post »sbeejustsaying
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:40amReally. When I was that age I would have been hysterical seeing anything like that. The poor little cute squirrel probably has a family. Bad dog! Bad dog!
Report Post »Ballgame
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:54amGrowing up in the woods and hunting all my life that dog would get a treat. Good boy…Hunt -em up!
Report Post »VanGrungy
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:07pmWhen a child is not disturbed seeing the death of an animal – that is disturbing.
========
no, that’s the beginning of a healthy outlook on life.. death is the final part of life.. Perhaps this child will grow up with a little less of an invincible feeling
Report Post »TRUMPER616
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:12pmI agree. I think the death of an animal (especially a cute squirrel) at the hands of her dog would normally be disturbing to a child. My children would have been disturbed and they didn’t have “issues”.
Report Post »She was almost giddy. Gee. I guess times are a changin’. I woouldn’t say her parents are bad, as noted , they didn’t over react, however I don’t think they handled the situation properly. They should have strongly discouraged her from touching (or in this case playing with) the animal because of the disease factor. Maybe they know something I don’t. Hillbillies eat squirrel road kill and live, I guess.
sissykatz
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:34pmI would have been disturbed myself. I am the one that would run and take the squirel away from the dog to keep it from hurting it. I would not let the child touch the squirell dead or alive because of germs and diseases.I think the whole thing is warped.My cats don’t even try to catch anything because in the past when they picked up a tiny snake or a chipmunk I take them away or say drop it and they do. They then get baths and their teeth brushed. They had rather not catch the animals so they don’t have to go thru that. lol
Report Post »lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:02pmWhew, good thing we had hand sanitizer for thousands of years or else we might not be here! The next time you eat eggs, remember that you’re risking salmonella.
Report Post »There are very important careers dealing with death.
Farmer GA
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:04pmWhy? I grew up on a farm and cannot remember the first time I saw a dead animal. Never bothered me. I didn’t grow up to go on a killing rampage or anything.
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 8:44pm3 year olds don’t understand death yet. Its called child psychology.
And I personally feel that anyone who is consumed by fear and dread at the sight of a dead squirrel needs their head examined. Its a squirrel. It is not diseased because the dog just killed it. Broken neck, most likely.
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 12:53am“My cats don’t even try to catch anything because in the past when they picked up a tiny snake or a chipmunk I take them away or say drop it and they do. They then get baths and their teeth brushed.”
LOLOLOL WHAT!?!?!? What the heck is wrong with you??? Cats hunt. They’re predators. Why would you deprive them of their instinct to hunt and eat? You’re nuts. Certifiable.
I hope you’re joking lol.
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 12:57amThe “poor little cute squirrel” would scratch your eyes out if it had the chance, you hand-wringing ninny.
Report Post »BrownEyedGirl
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 2:14amDeath is not disturbing, it’a natural. What the little girl did wasn’t “wrong” so why freak out and make her feel like he did something horrible? It‘s not like she killed the squirrel for heaven’s sake. My daughter is about the same age, and to be honest, she probably would have been scared and would refuse to go near it. But this little girl seems sweet, friendly, is tender with the dead squirrel and did exactly what her dad told her to do when he asked her to put it down and come inside for a bath. Pick your battles, folks.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:12amYeah, that would be my first reaction as a parent……
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:10amnever thought I’d see the word “cute” preceded by the word “morbidly”
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:19amYou’ve never read any Emily The Strange comics.
Why do parents let their little spawn run around outside in naught but panties anyway? Do they have no sense of decorum? No one but the local pedos wants to see that.
And yes, they should have had SOME kind of reaction other than just standing their slack-jawed and dumb. Take the squirrel away from the girl, tell you flatly that dead things are no play things, and then go give her a nice, hot bath in hopes she doesn‘t catch anything from the exposure she’s already had. They should not have prolonged the exposure like they did.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:29amWe live in a strange world.
Like your user name…….“My Utmost For His Highest”
Report Post »tloc13628
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:05pmResponse to lesbian packing Hollow Points..first she is not a spawn but thier daughter and if you had a child you would know that thier is nothing wrong and is quite normal to have our TWO and THREE year olds run around in their underwears playing.
Report Post »VanGrungy
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:06pm“No one but the local pedos wants to see that.”
are you speaking from experience?
Report Post »lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:57pmThe local pedos, I expect, wouldn’t care if she was or was not wearing a shirt. At that age, it’s perfectly socially acceptable for her to run around like that.
Report Post »Vie_En_Ras
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:30pmI won’t let my 3 year old run around in just panties and we live where it gets 100+ degrees in the summer! I think the only thing I was appalled by was the running around in just panties. I’d probably react like the mom if my daughter did that. As long as I knew how the squirrel died and it wasn’t hemorrhaging blood everywhere, no harm, no foul. Just inside and bathe. Though, I doubt she’d care much for a dead squirrel anyway.
Report Post »AmericanFaith
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:41pmIn the days when people were ignorant of touching dead things, people would die from decease. I didn‘t hear the parent telling the unlearned child that she shouldn’t be touching anything dead…and as for the panties, one word, pedophiles.
Report Post »LetUsReason
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 2:52pm@Lesbian
Since you have no comprehension of how little children behave, it‘s comforting to me to know that you won’t have any.
Report Post »USAMama
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 4:33pmI think anyone who refers to children as “spawn” has their own issues. My daughter is 3 and spends much of her time around the house in her underwear, I can dress her 100 times but within minutes she’s undressed again. Its just how children are, and most people with children know this. Another thing most people with children know is that you have to pick your battles and this is not one worth fighting over. If the kid wants to wear just her undies, so be it, save your energy for the bigger battles because with toddlers there are plenty.
Report Post »sbenton
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 6:20pmI was disturbed to see the young child videotaped in her panties. No problem with 2 and 3 year olds running around in their house with just underwear on, but when you put her in front of a camera and share it with the world, that’s a horse of a different color. The dead squirrel further shows the lack of judgement displayed by the parents. Dead animals have diseases, and are a health hazard. No instruction from Dad. Mom comes in foul mouthed. Put those two together, you might have a combined IQ of a small household appliance.
Report Post »chris3
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 9:56pmthank you vangrudgy and others it is fairly obvious who have or have had kids,to say what you said hollow point lez. says alot about you
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 1:18am@sbenton
What, do you have trouble controlling your pedophilic urges when seeing a 2 year old girl in her underwear? No sane, well-adjusted adult has any problem with toddlers running around in their most comfortable outfit.
You’re probably an only child who has no kids. That right there says it all.
Toddlers don’t like clothes. Clothes are the bane of a toddler’s existence. Like oil and water.
Report Post »Bob_R_OathKeeper
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 2:46pmLesbian Packing Hollow Head – Thank Goodness you’ll never have “spawn”, idiot.
Report Post »islandlady
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:10amThose microbiology classes in college paid off! If you could only see what grows in your kitchen.
Report Post »Of course this does remind me of a scene from Bones.
RightWrite
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:33amI think squirrels have Toxoplasmosis also.
Report Post »Secret Squirrel
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:35am.
“‘Little Girl With a Dead Squirrel’: Is This ‘Bad Parenting’ or Just a Morbidly Cute Video?”
Neither, it’s dinner if Obama is re-elected.
Report Post »BIGJAYINPA
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:42amFresh kill…fried squirrel and gravy for dinner tonight.
Report Post »CottonMPG
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:45amAt least it didn’t die of a disease. It appears healthy before the dog caught it. Kids are always touching gross things. I doubt the squirrel was more dangerous than the dog that killed it. The dog is probably carrying the same germs…at least it is now. I think it is a little yucky but harmless. I definitely think a lot of people overreacted to it.
Report Post »Veritas vos liberabit
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 11:56amYou might be a redneck if……
Report Post »VanGrungy
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:05pmwash hands.. that’s the next lesson.. no biggie
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:47pmTree RATS…Good eaten!!
Report Post »Dahart
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:49pm@SECRET SQUIRREL…..lol
I have some grate receipts for squirrel if you like
Report Post »lordcheeto
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 12:54pmI know exactly what grows in my kitchen, my bedroom, on my TV remote, etc. As far as germs go, what doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger. :)
Report Post »On a more serious note, though, it’s not as though she killed the squirrel. That would be cause for worry.
ShariO
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 1:30pmNone of those answers fit for my opinion. I’m sure she was carrying it when her daddy first saw her with it, so getting freaked out about her carrying it wouldn’t make much difference by then. I‘m sure she doesn’t understand the cocept of death yet, she just thinks she’s finally able to carry around one of those soft, cute squirrels. They can probably use it as a teaching moment if they choose. If not, oh well. There will be many more of those moments. That’s life. The mom in me thinks: At least she’s going to go take a bath afterward…
Report Post »Kansas Mom
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 3:55pmThis is seriously sick…this little girl is a serial killer in the making.
Report Post »AwakeAndReady
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 4:17pmIs it just me, or did anyone else catch onto the Dad noticing the mom’s anatomy and then zooming in and then quickly out again after he realizes that he needs the video to be “pure”?
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 4:22pmI remember years ago living on small acreage my next door neighbors let their little 4-5 yr. old daughter walk around all day with a baby calf (born dead) cradled like a baby. Made me sick, but I guess it happens when the child is looking for something to cuddle or save. Is that so bad?
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 4:41pmTo add to the dead calf story, this little girl ran around with only panties, and often her brothers undershorts. Yikes, and we had many farm workers around the neighborhood. Guess she was just lucky.
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 8:38pm@kansas mom
LOL are you nuts? Little kids under the age of 5 don’t fully understand death. I think its funny. She wasn’t trying to inflict pain on the squirrel, she was petting it and playing with it nicely.
This girl is perfectly healthy. lol lighten up!
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 8:47pmMy lord, no wonder we have so many superbugs these days, with all of you wringing your hands and having hemorrhages over touching a freshly-killed squirrel.
Getting dirty doesn’t kill you. Neither does touching a dead animal. Its not as if she exhumed the squirrel from its rotting grave lol. They gave her a bath afterward. She’ll be fine.
You people are silly.
Report Post »Eric Byler
Posted on May 13, 2011 at 10:04pmReminded me of the scene from Dumb and Dumber with the little blind boy stoking the dead bird while saying, “pretty bird…pretty bird”.
Report Post »Armed Patriot
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 11:04amAnybody allowing their child to play with a dead animal is just sick and disgusting. You need to bitch slapped.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on May 14, 2011 at 12:05pmI guess I’ll be one the “over reacting” parents…if my granddaughter picked up a dead squirrel…my first thought is…put that down…I couldn’t even finish the video…I wanted her to put it down!…yuck!
Report Post »thebarbarian
Posted on May 15, 2011 at 12:33am@ secret sqirrel
danmmmed, i thought a lib might have gotten to another conservative.lol
the parents needed to take care of this one. the squirrle may have been haosting a boat load of cute little pathogens.
Report Post »SamFox
Posted on May 16, 2011 at 2:12amNo big deal. The dad did say no more touching the squirrel after this & said the little girl had to take a bath.
To many people are afraid of every thing. Kinda hard to live inside a bleach bottle if ya ask me. .
SamFox
Report Post »