Low IQ? Socially Conservative? You Might Be Prejudiced, Study Says
- Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:26am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
Does having a low IQ and being socially conservative make you more likely to be…prejudiced? Yes, according to a head-turning new study.
LiveScience breaks it down:
The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.
In the study, researchers used two forms of intelligence tests and a series of statements to measure social conservative attitudes — statements like “family life suffers if mum is working full-time“ and ”schools should teach children to obey authority,” LiveScience reported. From there, they captured attitudes about race using statements such as “I wouldn’t mind working with people from other races.” Researchers found a correlation between having a low intelligence in childhood and holding prejudicial attitudes in adulthood, and the relationship linking the two was social conservatism. In a second data set, researchers also found a link between poor abstract reasoning skills and homophobia.
It’s important to note that the study refers to social conservatism, not political conservatism, and Hodson pointed out the researchers weren’t implying that all liberals are smart and conservatives are dumb.
“There are multiple examples of very bright conservatives and not-so-bright liberals, and many examples of very principled conservatives and very intolerant liberals,” he said.
Still, that doesn’t quite take the sting away, Brian Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of Virginia not involved in the study, told LiveScience.
“They’ve pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics,” Nosek said. “When one selects intelligence, political ideology and racism and looks at any of the relationships between those three variables, it’s bound to upset somebody.”
Regardless, Hodson said it’s a reasonable to conclude that a conservative ideology might appeal to those who have “trouble grasping the complexity of the world,” according to LiveScience.
“Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,” Hodson said. “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice.”



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (405)
Mr.Fitnah
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:18amFacts cause prejudice.
Report Post »joe conservative
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:24amExactly. You have to just love all the studies showing how there is something wrong with you if you aren’t a liberal. These people never give up, that’s why we have to stick together, and fight these nuts with everything we have. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jds7JMG1Ii8
Report Post »SEPARATENOW
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:28amIt’s a short trip from a study like this one to opening re-education camps. It’s called providing cover.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:38am@SEPARATENOW You got it that‘s probably the motivation for this ’study’,progressives will use pseudo science to push their agenda,a group of people has a low IQ so they need to be re-educated to get their mind right.
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:44amNeo-eugenics
Report Post »Cesium
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:13am@progressive slayer.. That is really easy for you to say isn’t it? Do you have any clue as to how scientific research is conducted? have you ever been involved in it? Do you even know any scientists? Do you understand the definition of the “null hypothesis” that drives all experimental design? Yea, sure, it’s all just a conspiracy.
Report Post »Mtroom
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:52amThey don’t need to open anything…They control education already…Prejudice is a triggered response to the brain from what an individual has experienced in his life time…Making it his own…No one else will have one like it, and no on can change it…You will flow into groups who think and act the same by instinct..Your friends are your friends…I can go on….The point is, it is your own view. No study can be applied.
Report Post »Lesterp
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:38pmCesium, You just proved what we are saying! “Do you have any idea”, leading right into. I am so much smarter than all of you. You tools don’t have a clue what makes the world go around, you just think it revolves around you!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:37pm@CESIUM Yes because scientists wouldn’t dream of having an agenda,kind of like the man made global warming fraud.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:17pm@Cesium
Report Post »Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:13am
@progressive slayer.. That is really easy for you to say isn’t it? Do you have any clue as to how scientific research is conducted? have you ever been involved in it? Do you even know any scientists? Do you understand the definition of the “null hypothesis” that drives all experimental design? Yea, sure, it’s all just a conspiracy.
======
For a ‘scientist’ you sure are uppety aren’t ya, oh that’s right most elitists have their heads up their arses anyway. You people all need to jump in a lake of fire – want some help?
From Virginia
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:43pm@Separatenow – No- not re-education camps. Death camps. Bill Ayers once said that they would need to kill one quarter of the hard cases (conservatives). At that time we had a population of 100 million – so he was talking about killing 25 million people. Don‘t think they won’t do it. They‘ve done in every place they’ve implemented their utopia.
Report Post »TAXLORDCOMETH
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 11:30amProgressives are deeply insecure in their ideology, which is why they always claim the intellectual high ground and denegrate their conservative opponent. It’s a defense mechanism. I’ve yet to meet a progressive that can last 5 minutes in a debate on any topic — especially health care. These people don’t know anything — but, of course, they had plenty of insults to try and intimidate me into silence.
Report Post »RisetovotesiR
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 11:44pmwhat facts are you speaking of?
Report Post »patriot308
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 12:02amI had no idea that the residents of DC, were so conservative. They have incredibly low IQ’s……. are as bigoted as anyone in the country. SO……. they are obviously, conservative! Wow the “study” must have merit……. Or maybe not.
Report Post »phil1765
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 2:55amCesium
Report Post »Why is it so easy for you to dismiss someones opinion just based on a study that is supposedly scientifically based? I guess you don’t think that science can be biased by ideology, but we have seen over and over again scientists skewing their research to obtain a desired result. I am sure that low IQ social conservatives are every bit as prejudiced as all the elitist liberals who feel the need to look down there nose at anyone with a southern accent or differing political leanings than themselves.
old white guy
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 6:53amyou want to study people with low iq go to detroit.
Report Post »angiea
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 10:48amAppears LiveScience is Prejudiced against persons with lower IQ’s and Conservatives. Live Science must be a handfull of Liberals of some sort.
Report Post »atechgeek
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 1:32pmThe Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanism and Social Drinking found that people who lean to the left of the political spectrum, aka Liberals, are genetically less able to be human but tend to party more with other people’s money.
Report Post »(Case Study : L388277SSH : Harvard University : Dept. of Genetics and Retardation : 2012
All Pro
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:17amConservative = progressive fascist
Report Post »Liberal = progressive communist
They’re both pin heads.
What’s the point of this article again?
BrotherWill
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:27amMe think you have no clue what a Fascist is, otherwise you wouldn’t of made such a retarded statement.
Report Post »SoupSandwich
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:40am@ALL BO
Report Post »Whaaah? Conserve=prog anything? See, this is why state sponsored drugs is bad juju. Dudely, put down the coolaide and grain, put the meth pipe back in the baby’s crib and wake up a lil before posting poop. We have already been over this while you were sleeping of last nights 27 Mickey’s Big Mouths. Libs have to lie. It is self preservation. It is ok. We understand you have nothing to stand on or by, so it is ok, for you. Don’t beat yourself up and down so much, it is yours and you can wash it as fast as you want, just be careful you don’t get a rash or pass out in the shower and hit your head, again and again and again. Oh, don’t get stuck on rinse, repeat either.
Bill30097
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:25amAll Pro Moron is more like it.
Report Post »tltmssc95
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:30amCheck out an excellent, well researched book called “Liberal Fascism” and I think you will learn that Fascism and eugenics and such were born in the liberal (progressive) movement. The idea that the intellectuals have a better idea of how the rest of us should think and live….in fact, whether we should live at all…is the greatest form of prejudice in the world.
Report Post »Marine25
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:57pm@TLTMSSC95
Report Post »Fascism was and remains a revolutionary form of racism/nationalism, one whose sworn enemies include Soviet communism, pluralist liberal democracy and the multi-cultural, multi-faith society celebrated by ‘progressive liberals’.
The book you reference, Jonah Goldberg‘s ’Liberal Fascism’, has been dismissed as propaganda by historians left, right and center. Goldberg begins by ‘defining’ his political and historical terms not only to suit his own soon-to-follow ‘argument’, but with definitions that have, in many cases, no resemblance to any actual historical or pedantic meaning of the words. Once that’s accomplished, Goldberg needed only to rely on the ignorance of his audience to spin any tale he wanted. He had Mussolini assassinated by right-wingers, Hitler riding about in a pickup truck canpaigning, and Italian fascists responsible for less than 1000 deaths. He was writing fiction. But as long as he wagered that his audience would be essentially uneducated and un-read, he could stretch their little imaginations however he wanted. Comic books work on the same premise.
Goldberg did nothing with that trash but provide adrenalin for the people who will actually shoot at us.
Jonah Goldberg, you can bet, wouldn’t disagree with the findings of this study. He depends on them.
Read Griffin, or Parker if you want to what fascism was and is. At least they don’t claim, as Goldberg did at the start, that they are writing for revenge. Didn’t that ti
UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:16amMy IQ just dropped after reading this article! Low IQ and extremism (left or right) may lead to prejudice but the biggest source of prejudice is “Ignorance”.
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:51amYou said it, ignorance causes prejudice. That is why all libs and progressives will for ever be racist, hate mongering morons that refuse to see the facts. Its all they have to stand on.
Report Post »BO_Bill
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:14amClearly it is an act of prejudice to note IQ Tables, and observe how the behavior and politics of peoples of different demographic groups correspond with different group IQs. In one simple analysis, we note that American whites average an IQ score of 102, Mexican-Americans in the low 90s, and American blacks around 85.
We then note the group voting patterns towards income redistribution correspond very closely with the inverse of IQ. In our example, let us consider that the Republican Party is nominally against State-enforced redistribution of income. Now again turn to numbers. The majority of American whites vote Republican, around 35% of Mexican Americans vote Republican, and around 5% of American blacks vote Republican.
American Jews have a high IQ but vote Democratic because they disproportionally populate the halls of the State and its related institutions, and financially benefit from a bloated central governing structure.
Everything makes sense, when you think about it.
Report Post »LeeroyJenkins
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:12amCool, thanks for the help in understanding myself. I guess it is safe to say liberals are not racist and more probable to work for a living. I presume that liberals are born with a golden stick up their a55 that props them to be self-righteous and arrogant.
My question is of the 21% of the liberals in the US. How many have jobs?
Report Post »tltmssc95
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:37amExactly. Isn’t it wonderful to see how all those liberal run cities like Detroit are flourishing. Most of us Bible Belt small town folk have jobs and take care our families and friends, but I guess it is just our low IQ that keeps us from moving to Detroit and the good life promised by our liberal intellectual surperiors.
Report Post »momsense
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:10amBlanket generalizations by Liberals are self servng–they only serve to make Liberal intolerance and prejudice justifiable. What can you expect from a person who obviously is teriffied of order and stablilty like most Liberals?
Report Post »NoBamaZombie
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:09amNot shocked that the ‘Peoples Republic of UVa’ would manipulate and distort this sort of info. Now for the facts—I know more people who call themselves “liberal” or “progressive” and really don’t know what that means, or saw it some sort of mind-numbing MTV, Comedy Central or someother Viacom reality type, sheepish programming. Those few that are intelligent enough to know and understand their political ideology are actually the most prejudiced. That’s whats so funny, the most condescending, arrogant, whining, finger-pointing, judgmental people, are those who use the guise of somehow penning themselves as open minded??? Liberal?? Perhaps some of these self described “free spirited” libs should review and find the actual definition of what liberal means. I’m pretty sure all these groups also consider themselves open minded and liberal…Occupy Wall St, PETA, N.O.W., Move-On.Org, ACLU, etc, etc. When history shows time and time again that though these are radicals, they are NOT tolerant nor open-minded. They are the contrary, just like most of the Hollywood demo/libby sheep who in fact are pretty dumb and out of touch with reality and would be highly intolerant of YOU, if do not condone their fascist, narrow minded ideology.
Report Post »SoupSandwich
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:22amLets not forget that the backyard of HOOville is the area where the 3rd graders did an OWS song, sort of, maybe, with some help of progressive liars, sort of, maybe, with a little help of liberal music wankers that cannot get employement outside of elementary school with a bongo. Beautiful area, but like Maryland, all full of socialists and liberals. It is what they do. Take an incredible area and people and reduce it to the crap they see in the mirror daily. Selfish people that are really ugly inside.
Report Post »bottlegnomesdolphin
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:04amSo lets see here conservatives are less intelligent but somehow are always the rich evil guy. And somehow lower intelligence in childhood leads to conservatism but I dont see that many republicans in the PJs. I guess all this study really shows is that you can skew studies to fit your ignorant stereo types.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:10amI see they did not test the Liberals in prison…
Report Post »beverlee
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:03amAnother study paid for by the Obama Administration. The Administration of SOME of the People…all the rest can go scratch.
Oh, and science…eggs are good for you, eggs are bad for you.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:52amYes .. anyone can make a “study” to get the desired outcome. And I am SICK of paying for them!
Report Post »Lord_Frostwind
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:17pmI continue to ask, why do we keep giving these people any credibility whatsoever? All they do is sit around and pontificate on how much better they are than the unwashed masses and why their theories are always right. So why do we even bother listening to these clowns wearing lab coats?
Report Post »ConservativesLie
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:22pmUmmmm……you know the study was done in Canada right? Perhaps more proof that the study was accurate?
Report Post »YouAreMistakenSir
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 5:16pmThis probably isn’t the right place to remark on blanket generalization and be taken seriously at the same time. Then again you did use the qualifier most so never mind I guess.
MONICNE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:58amIf the shoe fits, wear it.
TEA
Report Post »awiderview
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:58amIn contradiction to this study, I find many seemingly intelligent people posting on TheBlaze- not to mention Glenn himself. ;-)
Report Post »byehlik
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:06amSure, I’m socially conservative, AND Prejudiced, Against criminal trash no matter what color, social position, or sexual persuasion. Guess that gives me a low IQ? Better not tell my ops boss of my lowly IQ, Might not let play project engineer anymore. LOL! Nothing worse than a bunch of educated morons!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:11amMy IQ is so low i am voting for that nutjob Ron Paul!
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:54am“Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,” Hodson said. “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice.”
The study design is not so smart and neither is the progressive who is “interpreting” the “data”. Logical fallacies such as the one in quotes above are typical of progressives therefore my conclusion is that all socially progressive people contribute to the lack of order, structure and factual statements in pseudoscience, which was no doubt, funded by taxpayers.
Report Post »TxSon
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:52amNews Flash! Narrow minded, lazy researcher uses classic post hoc falacy to gereralize a false conclusion.
Report Post »PreacherMW
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:01am…perfect. I’m stealing this quote.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:04amPost hoc ergo propter hoc does not compute with taxpayer funded, government directed, poopy pants liberal elites.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:50amWell thank goodness yet another ‘scientific’ study has been completed and its results published. This study in particular means oh so much to America because many of us were beginning to worry that too many tax dollars were being wasted on social studies ‘research’.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:49amThen men like Jesse Jackson (who can barely speak the English laguage) or Joe Biden (who makes a fool of himself on a weekly basis) are highly intelligent?
Report Post »Dontbefooled
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:46amMore snobbery and condescension from the left but it’s the liberal policies that drive a society off a cliff and conservativ policies that give it a foundation for stability and growth. Who’s more intelligent, those that know how to make something work or those who know how to destroy it. Prejudice is a matter of the heart not the head!
Report Post »tbolt71
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:58amotherwise known as “educated idiots”
Report Post »kyredneck
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:44amOh well, what does it matter? I used to think that human intelligence was boundless in its ability to climb higher and higher. Now I think its more like a circle, one where liberals have managed to reach that point where they are actually the dumbest creatures on earth. Lacking the most basic instinct possessed by the lowest forms of life…………….the instinct to survive.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:56amExactly. They are called “useful idiots.”
Report Post »ConservativesLie
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:41amThis site really proves the study true!!!
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:45amHahaha, you are just so full of yourself. Of course we would call that dung.
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:49amOh I see your a liberal Idiot that thinks he or she has a high IQ – stay real heavy on the THINKS
Report Post »SoupSandwich
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:52amWow. Okay. Liberals poop in their pants. Really, studies show, that in formative years, then in waning years, liberals poop themselves repeadedly and often. Some languish in it, some play in it, some blame other people for placing poop in their pants. But, studies show, liberals are all poopy pants and the years in between they are mostly haughty, elitists, morons with no real friends or even a sense of religion to fall back on. Further, studies show that more poopy panted liberals commit suicide, yet no on could be found to conduct a study on said happy happenings. You really didn’t need this sight to tell you that though, did you poopy pants?
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:56amYou silly liberals really are unlearned and smug so continue to prattle on it’s so amusing.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:10amWell, you sure never came off as a member of Mensa. That’s for sure.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:15am@Conservativelie…At what University do you have tenure? Only a true genius like you could come up with such a scathing accusation….Did I spell all of that right? I dunno, I’m so dumb…
Report Post »bringiton
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:21pmName one lie, buttplug.
Report Post »RebelYell1862
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:56pm“CONSERVATIVESLIE” why don’t you run back to the huff post with your leftie buddies and find some more cars to crap on.
Report Post »ConservativesLie
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:24pmHahahaha!!!! Every post proves how right the study actually was!!! Thank you all for proving the point!!!
Report Post »Nanner-SW
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:03pmI am afraid I just have my personal experiences to go on rather than an intensive study. In my younger days the science teacher forced all of his students to take IQ tests. I pulled off something well above average (I do not believe it to be accurate d/t self-doubt). I am libertarian/conservative (freedom focused). My first room mate at college was a great deal more intelligent than me, a 4.0 English major who took many a opportunity to ridicule me d/t my religious/political beliefs. One of those socialist/liberal individuals who desired for all mentally handicapped babies to be aborted once the prenatal tests came in. She also happened to be the most racist person I meet during my stay, always talking about those gross, stupid, loud black girls. Oh how such a rarity my life must be to have met so many exceptions to this obviously unbiased study. Huh, I suddenly feel lucky . . . or blessed.
Report Post »theninthplanet
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:40am“Researchers found a correlation between having a low intelligence in childhood and holding prejudicial attitudes in adulthood, and the relationship linking the two was social conservatism.”
Was that to say dumb liberals aren’t bigoted?
I’m more interested in this stuff if its peer reviewed. Looks like this study was prejudiced from the start.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:29pmBe careful with the peer reviewed studies also. Libs often find like-minded “peers” to generate the results they desire (i.e. global warming, er….I mean climate change). Libs are so highly intelligent they certainly aren’t dumb enough to believe in God thereby they do not possess any kind of moral compass. Thus, libs don’t have to be too concerned with dishonesty, cheating or even producing flawed studies. Ah…..the intelligence of liberals.
Report Post »MiCurmudgeon
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:40am…And smart-assed Liberals aren’t?
Report Post »AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:38amBreathing? Have a racist A hole by the name of Barack Obama as a president? You might be prejudiced.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:37amHere we go again. Another university sponsored study that has it’s research strategically built around a desired outcome. All so the God hating, conservative hating, morality hating, drug loving, so forth and so on, left wing loons can pat themselves on the back and “feel good.”
Report Post »dmforman
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:59amHaving a husband who is a conservative college professor and constantly complains about research like this, I am not surprised by this .
Having worked in the inner city, I have found the liberal parents of the children that I worked with much more racist than I.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:34amDMFORMAN,
Report Post »I feel for your husband. I had to take a criminal psych course many years ago and if that female professor is anything like those who surround your husband I salute his strength to put up with them on a daily basis. From that point on in my continuing education I learned to never speak of my views and with some instructors just took the “garbage in, garbage out” attitude simply for the grade at the end of the course. My son is studying electrical engineering now and loves those classes since most are technical and the instructors rarely stray from the required subject. He does complain of his required periphery courses though. My wife and I warned him to be cautious and that some of these professors can certainly be vindictive. I barely made it through that course with a low but passing grade.
AJAYW
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:36amMaybe one should ask does a high IQ make you a idiot
Report Post »kyredneck
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:46amYES, maybe! I used to think that human intelligence was boundless in its ability to climb higher and higher. Now I think its more like a circle, one where liberals have managed to reach that point where they are actually the dumbest creatures on earth. Lacking the most basic instinct possessed by even the lowest forms of life…………….the instinct to survive.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:59amNO You need a IVY LEAGUE Education for that
Report Post »Harvard or Yale Preferably !
islamhater
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:35ami say bullcrap.
Report Post »HKS
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:29amWell, I guess a liberal professor can make a government sponsored study show what ever the government would like it to show.
Report Post »AgnosticRepublican
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 7:46amHe’s a professor at a college in Canada. If that tells you anything about him and his work.
Report Post »