Media
Mark Levin Would Support Either Bachmann or Santorum If He Were Voting Today
- Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:16am by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
Writer and radio host Mark Levin said on his Friday show that it doesn’t really matter who he supports for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination, and will support any of the candidates when they become the Republican nominee against President Obama. That said, Levin tells listeners that if the primary were being held today in his state, it would come down to either Michele Bachmann or Rick Santorum. For him, they represent the most “consistant conservatives,” have a high level of character, and are people that he would trust in the oval office to “do the right thing.”
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 706 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 548 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 367 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 361 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 367 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 281 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (134)
Frodo RinosBane
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:02amBoth of them together are a dream ticket. The way the RINOs put it, we can only win with someone who has changeable values.
Report Post »PatriotNAmerica
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:28amI’m sure he would. As a card carrying memeber he probably approves of putting the Israeli’s interests before Americas. That’s why he detests Ron Paul.
Levin is no friend of America. No matter how many Patriotic books he claims to have written. You don’t put the interests of another Nation ahead of America and then claim to be Patriotic. No matter who they are.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:33amI took one of them online tests for which candidate your views are closes to and to my surprise Santorum came in 2nd and Bachmann was way down the list. Does anyone here have a good interview of Santorum I mean a good one, talking about the issues. I would love to take a look. Here is an example of what a good interview.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onJ25hE2yQ8
hauschild
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 11:06amBachmann, absolutely.
Report Post »Rush_Baby
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:20pmGlenn Beck interviewed him a while back, just youtube it.
Report Post »Shiroi Raion
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:37pmBachmann/Santorum 2012!
Report Post »Allow the free market to work (no more cronyism). Stop ignoring the Constitution. Stop over-regulation. Secure the borders. Overturn the Supreme Court ruling on the 14th Amendment which allowed non-citizen women to have children in America in order to claim citizenship. DEFINITELY stop using the failed Socialist entitlement policies of Europe, China and Russia. Overturn the current mistranslation of “separation of church and state” and use it as it was intended – the government cannot control the church. It’s not only the courts and the Senate can have pastors and bibles. Phase out the Fed. End the Dept. of Ed. and give education back to the states and localities and end their subsidies. I bet that would drastically reduce the cost of education. Overturn Obamacare. Tort reform. So many wrongs to undo… How did we allow this to go on for so long?
FreedomWitness
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 7:32pmpatriotnamerica, that is the dumbest thing that I have read about Mark Levin, ever. And of course it is completely false to boot.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:51pmBachmann would have my vote in a heart beat!!!
Report Post »George Patton
Posted on December 5, 2011 at 9:39am@PATRIOTAMERICA well it didn’t take long for a paulbot to come out with the typical “if you aren’t for ron paul you hate America” crap. Thanks, for your insightful commentary. Paulbots are in a race with obama for who Americans are most tired of.
Report Post »ACLUHater
Posted on December 5, 2011 at 7:27pmSorry but Gingrich and Romney are fakes. But in the GOP world, fake conservatives are better than real liberals!
Report Post »TheCenturion
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 9:29amReagan for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IF, IF, IF, Gingrich would consider the opportunity placed before him, he would realize that he COULD go down in history right next to Reagan. Will he do it? Don’t know, but I have my doubts.
Report Post »jginmt
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 9:56amI would plug my nose if I had to vote for Romney or Gindrich.
I just don’t understand Ron Paul supporters. What is with their almost religious support? He will never get the nomination.
This week I have sent money to both Bachmann and Santorum.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:20am@Jg
Report Post »Maybe I can shed some light on why Dr. Paul Supporter will not hold there nose.
A lot of us have been holding our nose for a life time. We do not see a difference between OB and the rest of the Republican field. We want our Country, our Liberty, Freedoms and Constitution Back.
Mahtoska
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:37amSarah won‘t run at the top of the ticket but I’ve had a feeling that Newt might pick her as his VP…interesting choice but perhaps too polarizing. Don‘t get me wrong I LOVE Sarah Palin but I’m not sure if she’s electable; same problem with Michelle Bachmann, I LOVE this lady–character, integrity, grit and brains, but she simply doesn’t have the campaign budget to compete; sad really, I think she has what we need in a leader…
Report Post »BrianBDB
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:10pmIt’s the difference between voting FOR a candidate and voting against BHO. If I were to vote for someone besides Ron Paul, I’d simply be voting against BHO.
Call it religious if you like, but that’s what it comes down to.
Mrs Bachmann is preferable to Mr Santorum (to me). But both are so far down, they’re less electable than the “unelectable” Dr Paul.
If you see virtue in simply finding someone electable to run against that dolt, I suggest you seek out someone who lived in Ohio during the Bob Taft years. The guy was a train wreck. And he taught me how totally useless, nay, dangerous, a “moderate” Republican is.
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 3:48pmThose who says that they “don’t see the difference” between our current joke of a President and ANY ONE of the Presidential candidates is either a liar or a fool.
My main choice was Cain. Now I’m leaning toward Bachmann (it really depends on who has the initiative to visit Great Britain and/or Israel and vow to repair our Obama-broken relationship with our two greatest allies)… but anyone who labels themselves a Conservative or a Republican who SITS HOME if their candidate doesn’t get the nod is showing their approval of the evil this administration and the Progressive movement has infested America with.
And you will be just as guilty for any future evil they do if re-elected.
Report Post »James
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 7:45pmYea it looks like I’m gonna have to lean towards Bachmann and Santorum right now.Definetly not Romney nor Putty Newt.
ESQ
Report Post »LIBS-ARE-DINGLEHEADS
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 8:45amGOP field……as of now.
1. Romney: RINO…RomneyCare……serious hamstring(s)…..
2. Gingrich: Too polarizing. Too arrogant. Can you see mainstream America voting for him? ….neither can I
3. Ron Paul. The only candidate making sense. Telling the truth. That alone….won’t get him elected.
4. Rick Perry. Too “Bush”…..to the dumbed down masses.
5. Bachmann: Too fringy. Too tasered a look for the shallow populace. Great woman. 10 cent head.
6. Santorum: Give up Rick. I have more of a chance at the oval office than you do.
7. Huntsman: His daughters are the main draw here. Other than that….a vapid rich guy.
8. The rest of the field: A distraction.
Summation: BHO for 4 more years……..sad to say.
Report Post »TheCenturion
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 9:42amA Palin/Gingrich ticket would be great. Perhaps we should start a write-in campaign.
Report Post »Look4DBigPicture
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 9:45amWOW … aren’t you just a bucket full of cheer this morning. With an attitude like that, no one wins. Every one of these candidates is an excellent choice and will make a far better president than Obama.
We need to quit looking for the movie star and find the one who will get us back to our conservative roots. I tend to agree with Levin and Beck … Santorum and Bauchman will point us in the right direction … and we need to make sure conservatives take over both the Senate and the House in 2012. Otherwise, we’re doomed.
Report Post »dcart888
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:30amFor all conservatives especially those who have never lived in state of MA and have not educated themselves on who designed MA Healthcare plan aka Romneycare I would suggest you go to Heritage Foundation http://www.heritage.org/Events/2006/01/Massachusetts-Health-Care-Reform?query=Romney+at+Heritage:+Massachusetts+Health+Care+Reform and watch video of Heritage Pres Feulner praise Romney and the plan Heritage helped design. MA Healthcare is very different from Obamacare. We want (R) governors in blue states and then when we get one and they do the best they can with 6/7 dems to 1 gop in state house and senate we scorn them………… We need to stop putting senators and congressmen in oval office they are use to making group decisions/legislating not executive experience. Look in the mirror pompus conservatives who judge Romney are you perfect? Please explain how it was ok for Reagan to evolve to conservatives ideas after leaving CA but Romney is horrible? Gingrich will make Bush43 look conservative. Keep blasting Romney we‘ll end up with Gingrich and Obama’s second term!
Report Post »saywhaat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 12:24pmYou’re way toooooo Negative about the GOP field. No one is perfect. Most of the GOP candidates are almost perfect.
Report Post »But, you’re wrong about another 4 years for BHO. Never gonna happen!
hazmat2010
Posted on December 5, 2011 at 10:59am@LIBSAREDINGLEHEADS, noticed you really didn’t have anything against Santorum. Unfortunately for us the liberal media is once again choosing which candidate you will be allowed to hear. If they have a strong conservative record, they won’t get air time. I’m tired of RINOs and voters too stupid to realize they are wearing media provided blinders!! Pick the two strongest conservatives and pray we’ll get the Next 16 years! It‘s gonna take a long time to clean up o’Bummers mess!
Report Post »RJO
Posted on December 5, 2011 at 9:36pmUnbelievable how self-described “conservatives” parrot the talking points produced by liberals/progressives in their character assassination attempts.
Disconnect from the crap and think for yourself.
What’s scary is how effective the “framing” of conservative candidates has been.
Report Post »skiz
Posted on December 7, 2011 at 9:33am@ LIBS ARE DINGLEHEADS~Please tell me you are not going to vote for BHO. Please vote GOP they are all we have.
Report Post »Grace1798
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 7:27amMark does not KNOW Santorum. Talk to people in PA and you‘ll find out what he’s really like. You do NOT want him as President of USA. Believe me!
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 7:44amWhat is it we should know about him that supports your statement?
Report Post »Photochick
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 12:17pmYes, please explain? Seriously, if you’re going to say something like that back it up with truth. Remember trurth? Seems to have lost all importance these days. (jeez, now I’m starting to sound like my parents!)
Report Post »tzion
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:57pmUm I live in PA and I would certainly consider him.
Report Post »mrsalvage2
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:45amSamtorum and Bachman, both parts of the problem.
Santorum is part of the problem as he has comprimised with the enemies of THE PEOPLE when he was a Senator.
Bachman is part of the problem as she is proud of her work with the IRS.
The Taxcode is not part of the Problem, as the U.S. Supreme Court stated in Stanton v. Baltic Minimg that ‘the 16th Amendment gave no new power of taxation’ to the Congress.
This means that all of these years you have been raped by thugs. And Bachman is proud of that.
The system requires that you do nothing to educate yourself by reading the law and websites that have been banned by the government, and do not demand THE PEOPLE be left alone (McCoullouh v. Maryland) while your neighbor gets Raped, Pillaged, and Plundered, to support the value of your dollars in savings, and to suport Big Business Corporate Welfare running your sole proprietorship into the ground via unfair competition by their Tax exempt status contrived by who, MORE LAWYERS!.
I said no to this in 1991, and I continue and will forever say this.
I say no to Bachman, and now know why they Played the Song Lieing B***h fopr Bachman. If this was not the reason, they are justified in hindsight,
That is enough.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 7:07amOne thing’s for sure…If U.S. trade policy which promotes off-shoring of manufacturing does not change, the economy will NEVER recover.
Report Post »Our “Free trade euber alles” policies are killing us, and virtually every candidate supports the status quo.
DaytonConserve
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 7:12pmI suggest you read her book, Core of Conviction, to learn more about her than what you offer here.
Report Post »Endstatism
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:44amI would not vote for Santorum for one reason. His voting record on gun rights. Santorum went wobbly on the Second Amendment in his last two years in the Senate.
Were it not for Ron Paul`s convoluted and ill advised foreign policy views, I would vote for him because of his stand on constitutional governance.
Report Post »BrianBDB
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:22pmRon Paul’s “convoluted” foreign policy flows from the same understanding of the constitution. We have no business occupying foreign countries without a treaty or a declaration of war.
Some people want to have it both ways. But honestly, if you’re bound by the constitution, you’re bound by it in every way. Not just the ones that suit your views.
Report Post »Endstatism
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:39amI can say with certainty if Newt or Mitt gets the nomination, Obama will get a second term. We cannot afford to run another RINO. America needs principled leadership, not more business as usual and bandaid solutions to our debt and spending. I would be happy to see Bachmann get the nomination, but if not her, then we need to start a draft Sarah Palin, Marco Rubio, Allen West or Paul Ryan movement.
Report Post »marthasusan40
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 8:43amGood Post, I am starting to feel exactly the way that you do….run Sarah, run….
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 9:13am@ENDSTATISM, Please can I borrow your crystal ball ? You can say for certainty.. lmao, you’re a dope..
Report Post »saywhaat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 12:15pmI like your thoughts and choices. It’s heartwarming to hear rational comments.
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:30amRegardless of who gets the nomination I would hope both Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum would get high level positions in the new administration. Both of these candidates are true Americans I trust and can believe what they say.
Report Post »We need more people in Washington that are there to serve the people of America. Congress is it for themselves, the commie in chief is in it for the puppet master and his new world order.
Gary747
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:28amBachmann and Palin are two respected women who can make men WANT to give them money. And by chance, they exemplify the American spirit I yearn for. Love em both!
Report Post »Mahtoska
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 10:39amAmen Brotha!!!
Report Post »TheHillbillyCapitalist
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:03amThis is why Levin’s book went to Goodwill and the Beck subscription got shut off. I am so let down, I cannot explain. We have this thing called the Constitution. The aforementioned are ignoring it, just like Obama. I could cry, but I won’t. I know what liberty is. Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »Gary747
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:19amWhat are you talking about?!! What Constitutional issue is being brought up here? Levin simply stated whom he would vote for today. Geesh.
Report Post »Photochick
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 12:19pmThen why are you on the Blaze?
Report Post »Jaimo
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 7:41pmWow, you’re all upset with the rest of us yet you support an anti-semite like Ron Paul. Have you purchased your lifetime supply of tin foil and coat hangers for when “they” come for all the Ron Paul supporters? Freakin nutjob.
Report Post »sbroiles
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 5:12amHey, Levin, get off the air, ya big dope!
Report Post »sadmanwhossane
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:42amim only in it for the money. ever pondered that?
Report Post »sadmanwhossane
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:40amwho cares. they are all dyed in the wool new world order anyway. lest ron paul. but a sane man aint got a chance with a dyed in the wool my way or the highway mentality. newt is a new world order neocon and mitt is as aloof as the current. it is pathetic how we choose sides, draw lines for political reasons. there aint nobody on this slate that gives me slightest bit of confidence. WE ARE DOOMED!
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:19amHey DrSavage24, Ron Paul SUCKS!!!!
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:11amBachmann and Santorum are the only two true conservatives running at the moment. Either one of them can get my vote.
Report Post »ramburner
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 5:59amI agree! The rest are RINO’s and this country needs people who will not turn coat when they get elected. Newt, Perry and Romney would be no better than the current Speaker of the House, Boehner. We MUST clean house starting in this upcoming election. Anyone who has more than 2, 4 yr terms must be eliminated and replaced. We must never allow our representatives to feel that our vote does not matter again. Any candidate who forgets their constituents must be reminded that they WILL BE replaced at the next election. Any candidate who willfully forgets the Constitution, will also be replaced. We don’t need a Ron Paul to go back to our founding principles. Bachmann/Santorum in 2012
Report Post »eternalhostility
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 9:07pmbachmann voted for the patriot act. how do u explain that?
Report Post »wwwjr
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:00amAnybody, including Obama, except Ron Paul. That man is seriously a dangerous human being. If he is ever elected to anything again it is guarantee that there will be a nuclear detonation on American soil. He is the worst person in America today.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:43amSo you’re saying you would sacrifice your liberty for the promise of security? Didn’t Ben Franklin warn about this? You‘re an idiot if you’d prefer Obama to Ron Paul. You‘d be perfectly okay with massive government strangulation of the private sector and injecting itself into your life at every turn just as long as he’s willing to bomb Libya, Uganda, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc?
On the other hand, Ron Paul would cut the size of government at home (meaningful cuts, not just lower increases in spending) and secure our borders with the troops he brings home from our 900 bases in 130 different countries. Maybe Ron Paul is right that if we got out of the Middle East it would take away a major recruiting tool for the terrorists and eventually they’d be neutralized. Got news for ya, WWWJR, we‘ve been fighting these wars for 10 years now and we’ve had the Patriot Act for much of that time and still we had a Muslim radical shoot up a military base, another one assassinated an Army recruiter, and others tried to detonate bombs on airplanes. These attacks all somehow were not prevented by all these laws meant to “protect” us. The bombers only failed because of alert citizens, not law enforcement.
But you keep buying into the conservative talk radio garbage that Ron Paul is a kook because he would maximize our individual freedom and have a humble foreign policy.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:51amWatch the same Republicans (like Limbaugh) who lecture us year after year that 3rd party is not the solution go and support a 3rd party candidate if Ron Paul wins the nomination. Anything is possible if we have “conservatives” willing to support Barack Hussein Obama over Ron Paul.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 3:00amThat makes… Beck & Levin… for Bachmann!
Report Post »chevy68
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:39amHave you heard Bill Clinton is endorsing Gingrich. Likes his amensty stand. Another reason not to vote for the marshmellow man
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 3:37amLOL Clinton endorses Gingrich. Now that’s funny.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:05amYou mean, Bill Clinton is not endorsing Obama?
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:14amI am so glad I was reminded of the Pelosi/Newt global warming affair. I remember saying then that I would never vote for Newt after that. Unfortunately, I forgot about it and I gave money to his campaign but that will not stop me from voting for someone else. The scary thing is that some of Newt’s positions (illegals and global warming) actually make Mr. Slick look better. I want Bachmann or Santorum.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:15amRon Paul is an Obama-type campaigner. He is stoking up a kind of religious fervor for his ideals.
AmeriCat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:18amAgree. Still donating to Michelle Bachmann.
Report Post »We would trust Michelle with the future of our dear Country.
Santorum is also a fine candidate.
Thank you ever brilliant Mark Levin, for taking a stand!
Gorp
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:32amNow both of them would sure make a good team. Michele Bachmann for President and Rick Santorum for Vice President. Now there would be a ticket worth voting for!
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:55am@ GORP….agree, completely agree.
Report Post »Bachmann and Santorum, together on the same ticket….!
ramburner
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:05amAgreed. @GORP; agreed Vote Backmann/Santorum in 2012. Also, implement Term Limits; 2 Terms, 4 yrs each for each of the House and Senate. Let us clean house this election. Anyone who has had more than 2 terms is out!
Report Post »ramburner
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 6:08amAlso; somehow we need to start an uprising to change the polls for Newt, Perry and Romney. These three RINO’s are all OWNED by the GOP/Progressives and they MUST NOT win the nomination.
Report Post »Al J Zira
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:45amI don;t listen to Mark Levin’s show or much care about his opinion but Santorum and Bachman are my top two choices.
Report Post »Pouncing Porcupine
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:04amLevin‘s endorsement isn’t a big deal. Herman Cain’s endorsing of Newt will be a big deal. As will Palin’s. Newt will be the nominee barring any revelation that he ever murdered someone or commited armed robbery.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:17amIf Palin comes out and endorses Newt (or Mitt), her star will fall quickly. Many of her fans (myself included) are onto Newt’s big government tendencies and his big failures when it comes to sitting on a couch with Pelosi talking about global warming and being in favor of the individual health insurance mandate before he was against it. If she throws in with him many of us will be done with her. I‘m a Ron Paul guy so I’m hoping she makes a huge splash and endorses him, but I’d still respect her if she endorsed Bachmann or Santorum.
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:24am@ Al J Zira….If your top choices are Santorum and Bachmann….
then you would LOVE listening to Mark Levin’s show.
Report Post »If you can’t listen live, you can replay past shows on the internet, for free!
Mil Mom
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:27am@Pouncing Porcupine
Report Post »Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:04am
Levin‘s endorsement isn’t a big deal. Herman Cain’s endorsing of Newt will be a big deal. As will Palin’s. Newt will be the nominee barring any revelation that he ever murdered someone or commited armed robbery
***
Newt’s whole “Big Tent Republican” thing causes him to say and do some pretty crazy things, (Think Pelosi on the Couch) so nobody feels left out. Sure he’d make a good President, IF WE WEREN’T HALFWAY OFF THE CLIFF! At this point we don’t need a “Middle of the Roader, we need someone who’s going to slam on the brakes and throw this country in Reverse! And stay there until we get back to the road our Founders laid out for us. THAT IS EITHER BACHMANN OR SANTORUM (They’ve both consistantly proven that!! (Palin’s still my first pick, but maybe one of them could convince her to run with them.)
Pouncing Porcupine
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:36am@MIL
Report Post »I didn;t say I thought Newt is the best man for the job (that’d be Huckabee), I said he is going to be the nominee. Yes, Bachmann or Santorum could be a better choice than Newt, but since the only two realistic possibilities are Mitt and Newt, it’s a “Mewt” point. It is between those two. All other votes don’t matter.
NOT A CRAZY
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:16amI wouldn’t think someone with a Muslim name WOULD care about what a Jew has to say, huh Al. I love most of what he has to say. I am not on board with his Savage-like animal-rights crap but beyond that I am almost 100% with him.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 9:22am@AMERICAT, Idiot, he is saying he doesn’t like Mark Levin Why the hell would he want to listen to him.. What part of his post didn’t you get ?
Report Post »saywhaat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 12:38pmListen to Mark Levin. He really IS a brilliant Patriot, even if he appears to be angry and yelling. He is a very Pationate Patriot !! You’ll see
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:01pmI don’t believe Newt is “clearly” going to win the nomonation at all. Remember at about this time in 2007 when it was “clear” that the two people running against each other would be Rudy Guliani and Hilary Clinton?
The ONLY opinion polls that matter happen on second Tuesdays.
Report Post »korbin
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:41amnone of the candidates ever talk about the agenda 21 either. This is a huge issue which most of the country has no idea what it is, even though many partake in it everyday at their jobs. Its community building smart meters, no property ownership, loss of travel privileges, corralling us all into the cities where they have more control over all aspects of our lives. look how much land is being taken by the federal government, national parks will soon be off limits with no go buffer zones. watch this video from a stark left wing lesbian, tree hugging democrat if you want the truth. democratsagainstagenda21.com you will chi t ur self.
Report Post »Scottsman
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:57am…therefore Levin should back Ron Paul.
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:27amBachmann has spoken of Agenda 21, and does not like it!
Report Post »korbin
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:31amThere’s not a better more knowledgable Constitutionalist on earth. Mark has more insight on one finger than the entire congress. That’s why neither of those he chooses will get nominated. It is just not meant to be. I believe this country is over as we know it. The corruption is so deep the only way to redeem ourselves is to clear the entire Government, set 2 term limits, no more lobbyist and 1,000,000$ limit on campaign adds. Each candidate must meet every two weeks for a 2 hour debate without an audience live. Each candidate must answer each question, and if caught lying or stretching the truth by the next debate automatically are disband from office for ever. Won’t happen. Congress is full of people that have lost their morals if they ever had any. Lastly any bill they pass they must comply with and no special exemptions i.e.; Obama care. the only way to get our Constitutional republic back is for each of us to clear our eyes hold each and every official 100% accountable, none of this Charley rangel censorship where they get slapped with a wet napkin. Higher standards must apply.
Report Post »Scottsman
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:34amIf Levin was really a constitutionalist, he would back Ron Paul. Ron Paul has the record to prove it. Bauchman and Santorum come in a pale second and third at best.
Report Post »korbin
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:46amI like Ron myself, we don’t have a second chance here. this admin is so comfortable and blatant they know something we don’t. the president does nothing to help our country and everyone knows it. whatever they have in store is such he believes no matter what he will be re elected. we may not have elections. I don’t dis agree w you, just think he’s considered a little off by the masses.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:12amKorbin, it’s talk radio that makes him out to be a lunatic. Hell, even the MSM treats him with more respect than people who should be his allies. You‘re incorrect that he’s considered off the reservation (only by conservative elitists). Barack Obama and the left wants to divide and conquer us, right? Well, Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin make a great living with a divided country, too. It’s in their interests to see candidates in the race who will polarize the country. Ron Paul, on the other hand, very well could UNITE the country. Perhaps that is why he is so hated by influential conservatives. He’d be bad for the talk radio business b/c they’d have less to b*tch and moan about. The left would love his stance on ending the wars, abolishing the un-patriotic act, and legalizing drugs so innocent people can stop being killed on our southern border and in Mexico. The right would love his economic policies and hands off approach to government, making it as small as possible. He’s not out there, he’s the one candidate in the race that the country could rally around.
Instead of focusing on defeating liberals and fighting with them, we should try to convince them that our way is the best way, come to our side. Yes, we need to defeat liberalism, but we’ll have to do it by changing hearts and minds. Ron Paul is best able to do that, since he‘ll already have the liberals’ ear when it comes to foreign policy and the failed drug war.
Report Post »Scottsman
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:26amTry backing your buddy Ron Paul, instead of Ken and Barbie, you fake!
Report Post »korbin
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:33amIf you would pay attention to the facts you too would see some major flaws with Ron paul. He has the most constitutional knowledge and will over the other candidates, but he is not electable due to our older folks afraid of some of his policy statements. Just my opinion.
Report Post »Scottsman
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:39amEvery time some one says “facts”, they need to go smell their own BS.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:43amRon Paul on 911
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KKAJL9DNNk
DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:44amMark Levin is a fraud who rips off his listeners by telling them to buy gold from Goldline, which gouges its customers with huge mark-ups. You can buy gold at several other places for a fraction of the cost Goldline charges.
I used to respect Mark Levin, but as I’ve grown to be more of a fan of Ron Paul, I’ve become disgusted with his treatment of Paul. If Mark Levin was such a great constitutional genius, then he’d have no problem letting Ron Paul supporters onto his show to debate him. Instead, he shouts down his opponents (remind you of the left at all?) and name-calls….I’ve heard him refer to Ron Paul as “Ru-Paul”, a freak, and a lunatic, among other things. He treats Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney with infinitely more respect than Ron Paul. Levin would acknowledge that Paul is right on just about every domestic issue and the economy, but he smears him as a freak because he disagrees with him on foreign policy. I guess you‘re an okay Republican as long as you’re willing to maintain 900 military bases in 130 countries and fight an endless war against a tactic (terror), regardless of whether you’re a big flaming lib on every other issue. Question for the constitutional genius Mark Levin: Why have I never heard you call the RINOs Gingrich and Romney names and completely disrespect them? Mark Levin treats RINO fraud Republicans with more respect than he treats honest, principled Libertarian Republicans. That’s all you need to know about this fraud.
Report Post »Scottsman
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:45amThese “unelectable” comments about Ron Paul are a bunch of bu!!$it. Look at all the ‘former’ GOP front runners people like you thought were electable. People are afraid of Paul because he means what he says, and will do it.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:08amRon Paul is an idiot and won’t win the presidency……AGAIN!!
Report Post »No matter how much you broken record Paulistinians troll the websites.
DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:14amRationalman…that‘s exactly what I’m talking about. You can’t debate on substance (like the left), so you smear and call names. It tells people more about you (and Mark Levin) than it does about Ron Paul. You disagree with Paul on something, make your case instead of acting like a child and name-calling.
Report Post »texanpatriot
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:23amAmen Mark! I would to if we had a say.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:45amI also agree with Mr. Levin. My next choice would be Gingrich. What ever happens we have to support the candidate that gets the nomination. We HAVE to get the Democrats OUT. However we Have to hold the Republicans accountable if we do win. Our fight will not end with this election whichever way it goes. We have to be as organized and prepared as the Progressives are regardless. I am worried and I believe that if in fact we can win the election we will still see the same old greed and corruption coming out of Washington and the mainstream media. I just hope and pray that we have an election.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:20amPamela, are you aware that Gingrich was a sponsor of the fairness doctrine? The guy is just another liberal passing himself off as a conservative because he put his finger in the wind and found it blowing to the right in this country.
http://race42012.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-co-sponsored-fairness-doctrine-bill/
You still for Newty?
Report Post »reform
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:42amDr. Savage did you happen to watch the debate Mike Huckabee put on? Your candidate Dr. Paul once again bumbled his way on a very simple question. The question was what amendment to the Constitution if any would you do away with, his answer was the prohibition act which was reversed. Then he continued to ramble on about the Bill of Rights and this and that with no cognitive thought, I’m in agreement with one in only one of his thoughts that being to audit the Fed. Personally people don’t give Michelle Bachmann the credit she deserves if you really listen to her she is quite intelligent and knows facts. I’ll say this again Dr. Paul did not lead the charge about Obama care this is a Dr. that once brought children into the world and knowing it was wrong and unconstitutional.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 4:35amReform, are we voting for a debater/speaker in chief or a commander in chief? If we’re just going to vote for the best speaker/debater, then let’s coronate Newt Gingrich right now. Who cares if he was for the individual health care mandate, the fairness doctrine, and climate change legislation? He gives one hell of a speech.
I can tell you one thing about Ron Paul and this goes to what Glenn Beck often preaches about, which is we need people who say what they mean and mean what they say and who are people of honor and integrity. Ron Paul fits that to a ‘T’ regardless of whether you like how he debates. It’s easy to stumble in a debate. Personally, I was hoping he’d say the amendment creating the income tax is a bad one, but when you‘re on the spot you don’t always think of exactly what to say. I know that when he says he would seriously cut the size of government, he would do it. Who else is offering $1 trillion in real cuts their first year in office? Who else would cut 5 useless departments on the spot?
Being from Minnesota, I love Michele Bachmann, too, and she definitely led the charge against Obamacare, which makes me wonder how she could have so little support compared to frauds like Gingrich. But she’s not perfect constitutionally. Her voting for the Patriot Act is a real problem with a lot of Paul supporters. I also have a big problem with Obama’s assassination of Al-Awlaki and she supported that too. She’s good, Paul is better.
Report Post »leftCAforTX
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 1:21amMark’s as bright as they come. Now, lets just get 51% of the country to see it this way and we’ll be in great shape.
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on December 4, 2011 at 2:42amAgree!
We The People, the 9.12ers, those who Restore Honor,
along with those who cling to their guns and Bibles….
are more than that 51%.
We CAN make Bachmann and Santorum rise in the polls,
but even more important, regardless of the polls,
we CAN bring one of them to victory for the GOP Primary!
Bachmann’s life story is incredible and truly an inspiration.
Report Post »Her book, “Core of Conviction,” arrived today.
A great read for young women….it has everything!
Consider this for your daughters, granddaughters, nieces at Christmas.
We all need role models and heroes….now more than ever!