Men Interviewed for Anti-Romney Bain Movie Tell Megyn Kelly They Were Taken Grossly Out of Context
- Posted on January 18, 2012 at 5:57pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
The following revelation will likely cause an uproar among Mitt Romney supporters and bring significant heat on his detractors. The integrity of the “King of Bain” — a political movie which claims to tell the story of the former Massachusetts Governor’s time at Bain Capital – is being called into question after two men interviewed for the film claim that, not only were they unaware the film was about Romney or Bain Capital, their interview clips were taken grossly out of content.
So egregious was the alleged spin, according to UniMac workers Tommy Jones and Mike Baxley, that both men claim the clips in which they are seen talking about personal hardships were in fact references to incidents that came long after their time at Bain Capital. According to the interview subjects, the hardships they speak of in the film refer to a time when they decided to strike it out on their own by starting an independent business.
Fox News Insider adds:
In part of the film, Jones was featured talking about the fear of losing insurance, and he added, “We weren’t even talking about Bain or Mitt Romney.” In fact, once Bain Capital took over UniMac, Jones said he had no issues because everyone at the company received raises. He also received two promotions while they were in charge.
Baxley agreed and went on to say that he made it clear to the filmmaker that he was not saying anything about Bain during his interview and said, “I just think they did not want to use it as we were stating it, and decided to turn it around towards Bain.”
Jones and Baxley wanted to set the record straight, saying they were told this was a documentary about big corporations taking over small businesses.
According to reports, the movie was paid for by a Newt Gingrich Super PAC and paints Romney as a greedy, corporate raider.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 706 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 553 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 368 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 362 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 362 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 362 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 368 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 285 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 362 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (111)
bullcrapbuster
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:48pmNewt is a wolf in sheeps clothing. A cunning charlatan.
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:07pmYEAH……I saw this today on Fox……….that ad was very deceiving…..super pac or not…..these people don’t think anything is wrong with lying to the AMERICAN PEOPLE!
Report Post »VicksVaporub
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:30pmHow much did Romney pay Billybob and Slingblade to appear on Fox and lie?
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:56pmBain attracted… Conservative Investors to Risk… by acquiring faulty Businesses, fixing them, saving and creating Jobs… the Majority of the Time (where there is always some failure in any Venture)… returning Huge Profits.
We need more of these Ventures!
Report Post »GodWillPrevail
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 12:23amActually if you listen to what these men say. They say product quality went down from the first buyout to Bain buyout until the plant closed. Bain gave them raises but quality went down. The company Bain sold to did shortly thereafter close the plant. This was a very poor interview unless the purpose was to support Romney. Loved at the end when the one admitted he was a Romney supporter the other deferred to admit that. They both lost their jobs when the plant closed at least partially Bains fault who hardly created jobs there.
Report Post »fullblownjackass
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:17amOnce more Newton LEEEROY is proven to be a lying sack of dog snot
Report Post »http://voices.yahoo.com/article/9310001/newt-gingrich-conservative-futurist-10844011.html
Veteran Patriot
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:29amNewt does not bother with the sheep’s clothing, he is just a wolf. And because he feels that he is the smartest person in the room, he believes that nobody will care about the lack of disguise. In his mind it seems that he thinks that we’re not smart enough to differentiate between what he or any of the other candidates represent, the only thing that matters to anyone is that obama is out. He also shows a level of arrogance that rivals the current POTUS. He is a career politician that has come to believe that the american public is stupid. We do NOT need this man in office!
Report Post »Dcjones
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:53amThis will be old news anyways after tonight. NEWT IS DONE!!
DONE! GONE!
His ex wife is outing him tonight about this:
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/317440
””Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.
Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein. “””
Report Post »FormerLib
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:01amWhat? PR firms for politicians spinning the truth and manipulating facts? GTF outta here!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:33amThese are the same tactics we used in our 2010 “Revolution,” so we Taxed Enough Already should be mightily proud of how these winners will stop at nothing to advance their cause. If they were this feckless against DemonRat opponents and other trolls we would be cheering them on.
Remember, it’s not whether it is truth; it’s whether or not you destroy the enemy trolls!
TEA
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:46amRomney is a wolf in sheeps clothing. A cunning charlatan.
Add Messiah also. At least Obama doesn’t actually BELIEVE he is a GOD.
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:50amcjones
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:53am
This will be old news anyways after tonight. NEWT IS DONE!!
DONE! GONE!
________
Do you honestly think that if Newt is DONE that his people will vote for Romney? I like Newt. I liked Cain. I like Santorum but like Newt more. I voted for Ron Paul in the primary but will vote for anyone but Romney.in the general election.
There are MILLIONS who won’t vote for Romney.
When we vote for a Ross Perot 3rd party surrogate like we did in 1992 – if RINO Romney is the nominee, Romney WILL LOSE LOSE LOSE to Obama. So be it. Kick yourself for trying to force this LIBERAL RINO down our throats.
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:54amNewt will probably get elected! Remember we heard about Jennifer Flowers before Clinton was elected. With Newt whoreing around more than Clinton will make all the women voters vote for him.
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:29pmOld news from 2009 …
LastChanceToSaveOurRepublic said………”The Republicans promised Mitt the next nomination in 2008 to give McCaIn his shot at the office in payment for his long term republican party support.”
Please present proof of the above accusation. Hmm I thought so.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:36pmFalse. Completely. Where is your facts on them saying this. You assume to much and you know what that makes you?
Romney is the best for the job and even Tea Partiers are seeing that. His background and record shows he is the best for the position.
Remember the elite and establishment wanted Paul Ryan, Christie, Mitch Daniels, Jeb Bush. Romney is not the ‘establishment candidate.’ He is just the best choice and people are finding this out as they vet him and his conservative record.
Report Post »Custum
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:58pmThis comment is not directed at BULLCRAPBUSTER, for some reason I cannot respond to TEAPARTYFORROMNEY,
Now @ TEAPARTYFORROMNEY, How can the elite, and/or establishment want people that are not running, or willing to run for the presidency? That absolutely makes NO sense. The people wanted the candidates that you referenced, they chose not to run. The Establishment has chosen Romney, but Romney is running into “Free thinking”, American‘s that are not on the Media’s pay role. Good luck with your propaganda!
Report Post »Bush Hating Conervatives make me sick
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:50pm@ Custum You know the real funny thing is. Newt is somehow the outsider. He is MR WASHINGTON!! He is the definition of Establishment!! Career Politician. Former Speaker, who had to resign in disgrace!… Yet somehow Romney is the Establishment LOL
Report Post »Gnostyk
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 4:32amRomney, a conservative. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:15amRomney has pretty much an insurmountable hill to climb to beat Obama. Why? Because Romney can not come against Obama on Obamacare due to his own Romneycare. As a result one of the largest issues that could help beat Obama has been pi$$ed down the drain if Romney is the nominee.
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:54amThe Republicans promised Mitt the next nomination in 2008 to give McCaIn his shot at the office in payment for his long term republican party support.”
+______
I wouldn’t doubt it. McCain and Romney spent 2008 trashing Sarah Palin instead of Obama. Romney trashed her for YEARS because he feared her. He did a good job.
Palin (Like Hillary Clinton) then got in bed with her enemy and endorsed RINO McCain in 2010 in his senate race re-election. Why? She purchased an Arizona home in preparation for a run for the senate of her own later. You scratch my back. I can scratch yours is alive and well.
I would still vote for Palin. I will never vote for Romney.
Report Post »guntotinsquaw
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:43am@TeaParty…guess some of us TEA didn’t get the memo…I will NOT vote for Romney, Newt maybe a wolf…but at least he isn’t trying to hide the fact..what I see is what I get…I remember Newt as speaker..he is why I’m not a Repub…but I will vote for him..and I don‘t care how many wives he’s had, or what couch he sat on…he can carry the independent vote.
TEA
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:55pmI think there is a huge difference between actually advertising lies and being guilty of telling facts in such a way that inferences may tend toward an incorrect interpretation. For instance I heard a “Winning our Future” ad today that replayed Mitt Romney’s “I am dedicated to not changing a Woman’s right to choose…” And they stated following his quote, that “Romney thinks…“ As in present tense ”thinks“ as opposed to ”publically stated…” which would be more accurate. Romney has consistently made the case, not only with his mouth but also with his governing record that he is pro-life, he has admitted an evolution in his convictions, but has acted according to his current stance since he took office in Mass.
The ads aimed at Newt and even Santorum (once a convicted felon always a convicted felon no matter what “debt” to society has been paid) have not necessarily been nice, but they certainly were factual.
And although I have posted the following, it bears repeating. Romney has been consistently aloof from the actions of the Superpac (Restoring our Future) claiming not only to not be informed but more importantly to not be coordinating their efforts. Newt, on the other hand, announced the coming 27 minute expose on Romney’s record at Bain before it was released. He knew of it, about it, and was even bragging about its contents before its release. I would call that “coordination” between Newt and “Winning our Future.” to be continued…
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:01pmAnd, of course, Newt has been the most vocal about Romney having the ability to change what the Superpac is running in their ads, which, according to the law, he does not. Romney owns the issue when he stated that current Campaign Finance Reform is flawed and needs to be changed to allow for more responsibility. But the reality is, the ads coming from Restoring our Future have been vetted and the facts they publish are correct. Its Newt‘s and Santorum’s records that make them look bad, not the ads from Restoring our Future, which is legally not affiliated with any candidate. Typical spoiled brat mentality to attack and deny that a painful reality actually exists. They should have been better prepared to handle the disparity between their supporters and Romney’s. Unfortunately, what Newt has shown, if in fact he has had influence over “Winning our Future,” is that if he had more money flowing in he would simply peddle more garbage, innuendo, and slander without basis in fact. Shame on Newt, and shame on anyone buying into his temper tantrum.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:10pmI think Romney is starting to find his voice on these attacks. He just bit back at Gingrich and it is pure and true, everyone has to agree: http://url2it.com/lhqa
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:14pmRomney made Newt look like a fool in the debate. He first got Newt to say out loud that federal law indeed states that they cannot coordinate with their PACs. He then proceeded to talk about how Newt’s PAC has been putting out ads that are provably false, which Newt attempted to interrupt with “but I…” Romney went on to say that he has publicly said he hopes his PAC takes out any inaccuracies, which is exactly what Newt has done. He finished by stating that to suggest they have different standards concerning their PACs is ridiculous.
That was the best and most telling moment of the debate, but the media decided to focus on the ridiculous food stamp question. That was deliberately teed up for Newt to hit out of the park with his big orange plastic bat. In fact, almost every question given to Newt was set up for him to throw back red meat.
Report Post »Bush Hating Conervatives make me sick
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:44pmSee that’s the thing, Romeny’s superpact just pointed out the differences between Romney and Newt. Newt’s superpact has been exposed for being straight LIARS!! Newt’s a pig!! He’s also a spoiled baby! Is he done throwing his TEMPER TANTRUM!!
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:25pmBush hating conservatives make me sick as well. He is by FAR the best president of the 21st century.
Report Post »krjones
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:11pmNow thats funny
Report Post »DD313
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:43amActually, I think it’s sad,but true.
Report Post »glassbeadlady
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:35amPride cometh before the fall. Newt is the biggest cheerleader for himself, I don‘t care how good he is in the debates he is a PROGESSIVE and we can’t trade one for another. If Newt gets in we can welcome FDR’s CCC again to do busy work in our national parks.
Report Post »TxSon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:34pmIn too many cases Spin = Fraud. Thanks for exposing it.
Report Post »TJexcite
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:27pmGot something wrong that no one is looking at. “the movie was paid for by a Newt Gingrich Super PAC” When in reality it was paid for by front group, who was paid by another front group who was paid by Center for American progress and by the Tides foundation who was paid all paid big money by The Open Society.
This whole “movie” was made to be used by the DNC in September against Romney and do big damage as it would be to late to get context. When Newt went down the pass to attack Bain. They dusted this off and made the Super PAC just to release this movie.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:31pmIt is reassuring to see that the GOP top tier candidate, Gingrich has strong connections with the DNC.
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:39pmTJEXCITE
do you have links that track that money trail? I’d be interested
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:41pm“It is reassuring to see that the GOP top tier candidate, Gingrich has strong connections with the DNC.”
When conservatives think of great presidents, and they think of George Washington, Abe Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan. When liberals think of great presidents, they think of Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and Bill Clinton.
Newt Gingrich said that FDR was the best president of the 20th century (possibly in history), and that he considers himself a “realpolitik Wilsonian.” Furthermore, his crowning achievement is having worked closely with Bill Clinton as Speaker of the House. Hmm….
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:15pmTJex…….WOW IS THAT TRUE?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:20pmI’m wondering where the Paul supporters who think the Bilderberg group paid them or threatened their lives are
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:55pmLOL LOL LOL
Did anyone watch these two in that interview? They are dumb as dirt. It was embarrassing to watch. Their speech and mannerisms were of dumb yahoo’s. They weren’t play acting either. Viewers expected them to start scratching themselves in inappropriate places any moment.
LOL LOL LOL The best part came at the end of the interview when the fattest one (on the right) said he was leaning towards Romney’ as who he would vote for. THAT got me laughing harder.
These two dorks are older whiter versions of Julio Osegueda who was a 2008 Obama supporter. Remember him?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT9R9qvUn9w
When Obama picked him to ask a question the guy said “Oh it’s such a pleasure to see you Mr President. Thank you for taking time out of your day. Ohhh, gracious God thank you so much! Bless you! UAGGGGAAA”,
LOL LOL LOL These three dumb peas are of the same pod voting for Obama and Romney. .
The fat one on the end leaning towards Romney also said he was from Florida. We can all stop wondering who the low IQ Florida residents were who couldn’t figure out how to punch a ballot (hanging chad and said arrows were confusing) in 2000 when people for 50 years in over half the states never had a problem using these same ballots. You are looking at them. .
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:08pmNow that you’re done insulting their intelligence, what does it have to do with the fact that they were deliberately taken grossly out of context?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:11pmInsulting them doesn’t change the fact that they were deliberately taken grossly out of context.
What does it say about Newt when one of Mitt Romney’s supposed victims is leaning towards Romney?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:13pmHmm browser bugged out on the first post. How embarrassing.
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:14pmThey are too dumb to know what they said or agreed to.
I bet they can’t read well and signed their contracts in crayon.
Report Post »g4r4e0g
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:14pmYou’re calling other people dumb. LOL LOL LOL.
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:24pmFreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:11pm
Insulting them doesn’t change the fact that they were deliberately taken grossly out of context.
Report Post »_____
How do we know that? Listen to them. Can they even remember what they did yesterday? If they were taken advantage of, it would be easy to do. Did they sign a contract? If so, were they smart enough to get a lawyer to review that contract? Were they paid for their interview? Before they opened their mouths, they should have had a contract that said they reserved the right to preview/approve their image/statements before the film could be shown. If they didn’t protect themselves, it is a he said/he said situation and they lose.
aclawson
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:28pmCome on, man, you don‘t even know when to use an apostrophe and you think you’ve got the cred to say stuff like that about those guys? What a clown.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:29pmWow…….you are a real piece of work. They were unknowingly used by some Hollywood troll and you think that is funny and a reason to openly mock them.
Report Post »goldmind
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:42pmWhat is most disheartening, is how these idiots and idiots like you, must buy into any advertisement to assist you in your decision making. The real villains (who always emerge from these political slop operas with pockets full of money), are the media. They are specialists, in keeping the divisions in place and on top. I can do without the commercials, can you? The internet has more then adequate information about the candidates from both factions, so why do you need the drama? I’ll tell you why. You are insecure, a follower, intellectually stupid, judgemental, and in need of media affirmation. In essence, a Yo Yo, controlled by the whims of these media goons and their political counterparts. Like most in your depraved class, you need validation. Your votes are meaningless, because they are being bought…just as you are being bought like a crack whore for a dime rock. Think about it, the next time you fondle your remote and gaze into the idiot box that so humbly keeps you in check.
Report Post »since1629
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:52pmI don‘t get where you’re coming from here. Are all people with a Southern U.S. drawl “stupid” to you? Or is it because they use the word “ma’am”?
Maybe I’m a simpleton, but those guys sound like pretty decent dudes to me.
Report Post »ronlohnes
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:29pmWhat an embarassment…you wanna talk “dumb”, all one needs to do is read your comments. Unbelievable…
Report Post »amtsoundsmith
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:32pmAnd you’re an elitist pig. It’s okay though; you probably have an ugly wife and a sad, worthless life.
Report Post »FranciscoDAnconia
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 1:07amNOTVOTINGFORROMNEY-
I can hear your mom calling you to finish your chores. You better get on that so you don’t get grounded. Seriously, give your keypad a rest before you bust the keys.
Report Post »stagedlife
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:54pmI love how even Republicans are hammering someone for living the American Dream. Whether the assault is over how little they pay in taxes percentage wise or how they make their money. If we let it continue America won’t be America the land of opportunity it will be the land without opportunity.
Let’s all gang rape the successful. How ridiculous.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:51pmI am against the negative ads but I do like the vetting. Problem is that everyone’s ads are false. Gingrich‘s attacks on the social issues and tax ’hikes’ are false. GingrichPAC’s attack ads on Bain are false. Romney‘s PAC ads against Gingrich’s abortion record is wrong. Santorum‘s attacks on Romney’s social issues stances are false. Perry has also done plenty of attacking, especially, like Gingrich on capitalism and class warfare. The falsehoods need to stop but the negative true ads can stay. Gingrich, you are not sending out factual ads and they have been proven wrong.
Report Post »Notorrius
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:50pmThe problem seems to be the PAC s on all sides keep putting out junk. We as Americans need to make our own minds up. Every candiate has issues we don’t like so we have to pick and choose which one is closer to our beliefs. We were lied to about hope and change what we need to do as Americans is to Change not hope who will be our next Leader in Chief.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:42pmThis is lengthy, but worth the watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ARnzBOkKAiE
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:47pmI’ll vote for the first candidate with the balls to do a debate with an AR-15 slung over his shoulder the entire time.
Report Post »SingerGuy
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:35pmI can’t stand those “Winning Our Future” ads. This just strengthened that feeling. I’m not waving the Romney flag, or sporting the Romney bumper sticker, but the outright deceit of this group against him is maddening. I’m glad these guys came forward to tell their side of the interview. I’d love it if they had also shot some good B-roll they could put on YouTube to show the raw interview.
Report Post »mikellyusabr
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:33pmThe report above says, “the movie was paid for by a Newt Gingrich Super PAC.”
The video states that the Super PAC bought a movie that was already made by someone else. So the movie was actually paid for by that someone else, then sold to the Gingrich Super PAC.
That’s the way I understand it. But I would not have understood that from just reading the article. I would have understood that the Gingrich Super PAC hired someone to idealize the movie and funded the production.
Am I missing something?
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:00pmYes, the Super PAC was Newt Gingrich’s, as I understand it, but he had to give it up when he ran for election. Maybe I am wrong, but I was researching all about Newt Gingrich after my Mom lost her job as a result of Newt’s “consulting” work. Sheldon Anderson, the ***** behind financing this smear video is one of these guys that believes he can buy off any politician he chooses to get whatever he wants. Supposedly, this is how he got his casino license. Obviously, he couldn’t buy Romney, as I suspect nobody can, which was proven last election as McCain won the primary. These are the same guys who supported McCains campaign last election. They don’t care if these people are Democrats or Republicans, whoever they can buy to get the policy favoring them, is all they are concerned. I suspect Romeny really made them angry by denying them and this is his pay back. These are ruthless billion-airs and I am afraid that those of you who are allowing you bigotry ( and I am not saying you, just some) to feed into the idea that Romney is the establishment guy while Newt is some true patriot, are seriously off course. Romney has given away most all funds to charity or denied pay for his services all his life, while Newt has never worked a real job and is angry he can’t make more money just because he is so smart. We all know this type of intellectual elite most despise, yet, people are willing to let Newt off the hook. No explanation for it. At least go for Santorum who is a thief.
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:32pmThat’s what they get for opening their mouths. Keep your mouth shut and they can’t take you out of context.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:47pmIt is sad that they were misinformed as to WHAT they were being interviewed for.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:29pmWell I am SHOCKED >> I tell you SHOCKED … (sarcasm)
Report Post »blaster21996
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:26pmWho cares….. Mitt sucks ,,,,Newt sucks!
Report Post »mathews2113
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:43pmyou forgot paul, he sucks too…..
Report Post »SmallGovBigGuns
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:23pmhaha is anyone surprised this movie was garbage?
no one should be angry that investors buy up failing companies and rework them into profitable companies. they hire more in the long term, help the financial sector, and build more stores. ******** are so dumb
Report Post »masters11111
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:27pmwall stree journal comments everyone watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb-WKSX1MF0
Report Post »bajaman
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:21pmI think all this crap, digging into Bain, the attacks on Cain, attacks on whoever is going to get the republican nominee, is BS and empty words until someone finally holds Obama’s feet to fire and VET him! I mean he’s still getting a free pass!
Report Post »DD313
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:51amObama’s no VET, but he does have a free past!
Report Post »Rockyspoon
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:20pmThis “Winning the Future” bunch must be kidding themselves if they think lies like this will help their candidate. I was leaning toward Newt, but not in a million years, bozos. Not in a million years.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:12pmI have more confidence in Newt, Santorum than Romney to beat Obama. Could be wrong but that’s where I sit.
Report Post »FranciscoDAnconia
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:25pmSince Newt Gingrich supported the Massachusetts health care mandate along with the one and only HERITAGE FOUNDATION. Explain to me how Newt is more conservative?
Somebody please?
Report Post »ReaganBaby
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:30pmNewt is a HUGE liberal, wake up. Even his super PAC has to spin positive to false negative lies. He is a lying cheat, just ask his former wives and those who serve next to him in office. Newt cant win
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:51pmNewt is a progressive and his heroes are TR Wilson and FDR,all those men were progressives,like to like.He’s in favor of the individual mandate and he wants to have judges arrested who make rulings he disagrees with,sounds like a real constitutional conservative.
Report Post »DD313
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:54amWait until the interview with Newt’s ex airs, and his ship will hit the sand.
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:10pmYou mean there is corruption in leftist Hollywood?
Report Post »drobarts
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:07pmMitt Romney 2012! The only REAL and ELECTABLE choice!
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:11pmI beg to differ. He has no fire. Newt has it and if he keeps it going will win the nomination and beat Obama’s arse in debates.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:12pmI appreciated this report. IT was COMPLETE. IT told the WHOLE story. I hope that NEWT’S pac will stop this movie.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:16pmThat would certainly not bother me one bit.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 7:25pmAre you serious? or seriously ill? Are you a benefator of his proposed policy? a Croney? cause those are the only people that will benefit under his facist regime that he will establish once he holds the riegns of power!
WAKE UP!!!!!
Report Post »father_of_10
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:06pmYou mean someione lied in a campaign video? ARE YOU KIDDING ME!?!?!?!!
Report Post »Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:04pmLet’s take this moment to ask – if all the conservatives… you and me for instance…. think that Mitt Romney is the wrong choice for our candidate for president…. then who the heck is “voting” for him? Why is it that he is in the lead when EVERYONE I talk to says “There HAS to be someone better” ?? I smell a fish here. .. and I wonder who is behind this Romney push. I know that FOX is really slanted towards Mitt — (don‘t tell me I’m wrong) — so I have to ask…. am I being fed a load of crap from the RIGHT?? I already have had my fill from the left…. I don’t need seconds, thank you. — makes ya want to go “hmmmmmmm”…….. doesn’t it?
Report Post »jungle J
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:06pmmake up your own mind.
Report Post »father_of_10
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:09pmCould it be that the media is refusing to air any information about his supporters? If Obama and Pelosi WANT Romney to be the nominee, then why is everyone from Obama to Pelosi to Newt and even you trying to hard to make sure he is NOT the nominee?
I’m a Romney supporter. My wife and all of our family and friends except for the gay guys across the street are too. And I think secretly they are going to vote for him too. Obama and Co. are scared to death of Romney and that is why they are desperate to take him down as soon as they can.
Report Post »FranciscoDAnconia
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:23pmERIC THE RED STATE-
Are you kidding me? Fox news does not like Romney at all. They like Gingrich. None of the media protect or back Romney. When is the last time anyone defended Romneys religion? Never. Nobody cares that Romney gets baseless attacks. Where is this candidate that everyone wants? Jesus Christ is not running for President sorry so I guess we will have to settle for a human being. For a moment lets not pretend that every other candidate up there is somehow more conservative.
Report Post »LastChanceToSaveOurRepublic
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:46pmOld news from 2009 …
The Republicans promised Mitt the next nomination in 2008 to give McCaIn his shot at the office in payment for his long term republican party support.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:50pmFox News fervently and blatantly supported McCain last go round, then they gave their co-conspirator a job. They have been anti-Romney from the get go.
There has been a never ending narrative that nobody wants Romney, and that Republicans are dissatisfied with the field. It is simply a desperate tactic to try to wish away reality.
Look at how they try to spin his victory in New Hampshire, with 40% of the vote and a double digit lead over the next contender, into a loss. Then they try to say that it is just because the conservative vote was split… except the liberals and moderates voted mostly for Huntsman and Paul. Hmm….
I’d like to see how they would try to spin it if Romney carried all 50 states. “Looks like the Republicans settled on Romney, even thought they really don’t want him…”
By the way, Romney is a beast, no matter what the mainstream media says.
Report Post »ctw19
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:53pmNetworks want there to be a close race, because the uncertainty improves ratings. it also forces PACs to buy lots of airtime for their candidate. These campaigns are serious money makers for big media.
This is why there have been so many debates. They get good ratings!
Romney is winning in most states, this is just a sideshow.
Report Post »