Michael Savage Offers Newt Gingrich One Million Dollars to Drop Out of Race
- Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:22pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
Writing that the Republican presidential field only boils down to two candidates — Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich — and that only one of those candidates — Romney — is capable of beating Barack Obama in the general election — conservative radio host Michael Savage has offered Gingrich $1 million to drop out of the primary race within the next 72 hours.
Savage posted the announcement on his website, a portion reads as follows:
NEWT GINRICH IS UNELECTABLE. MITT ROMNEY IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WITH A CHANCE OF DEFEATING BARACK OBAMA, AND THERE IS NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN THAT FOR FUTURE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THEREFORE, I AM OFFERING NEWT GINGRICH ONE MILLION DOLLARS TO DROP OUT OF THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE FOR THE SAKE OF THE NATION.
IF NEWT GINGRICH REALLY LOVES THIS COUNTRY AS MUCH AS HE SAYS HE DOES, IF HE REALLY WANTS WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICA, HE WILL SET HIS EGO ASIDE, CALL ME, AND ACCEPT MY OFFER. HIS CONTINUED CANDIDACY SPELLS NOTHING BUT RUIN FOR CONSERVATIVES, REPUBLICANS, AND ALL TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS. ONE MILLION DOLLARS IN EXCHANGE FOR PRESERVING THE NATION, NEWT. I SAY TAKE THE MONEY… AND DON’T RUN.
Savage also provided a bullet-point list of all the reasons why he believed Gingrich was incapable of beating Obama, including his marital infidelity and involvement with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Savage wrote that Gingrich will “look like nothing more than what he is: a fat, old, white man.”
While this may be nothing more than a publicity stunt for the radio host, many prominent conservatives have also voiced their concerns over a Gingrich run and feel the former House Speaker is less electable than Obama.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 706 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 554 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 370 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 362 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 370 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 286 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (279)
SHIPMONEY100TRILLION
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:49pmI think Savage should at least have the pleasure of Gingrich shooting himself in the foot live the show for that much money. Now that should be easy.
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:31pmToo bad Savage didn’t offer a million to Obummer NOT to run…….
Report Post »IMAWAKENOW
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:45pmFunny, Glenn said his pen or shoe could beat Obummer, But Newt can’t, really?
Report Post »AgentP
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:14pmI just about can’t stand Savage, but on this I have to agree. Newt beating Obama is longer odds than Dole beating Clinton
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:17pmDISGUSTING!
Gingrich Hits Romney from the Left
Newt Gingrich has adopted an anti-free market argument—a favorite of the political left—to criticize Mitt Romney. Gingrich accused his rival of making money by “bankrupting companies and laying off employees” in his years at Bain Capital.
Whether its investments were successful or not, Bain Capital was engaged in the rough and tumble of free market capitalism. Thus Gingrich’s criticism, coming from a conservative, was surprising.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/gingrich-hits-romney-left_611985.html
WAKE UP ALL YOU SO CALLED CONSERVATIVES? How do you explain this line of attack coming from your ‘CONSERVATIVE FUTURIST” Savior?
Dr. Savage is absolutely correct: Newt Gingrich must be defeated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moFsABsJNL4
Report Post »FlamingFartSyndrome
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:34pmWAKE UP AMERICA!
Neither Newt or Romeny will be able to beat Obama, because they are all big government progressives. Choosing between these three is like choosing between jumping of a bridge, jumping off a cliff, or jumping of a building.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:51pm@ ROMNEY2012
Report Post »“DISGUSTING!”
Kinda saz it all don’t it.
TH30PH1LUS
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 12:33amNewt & Obama are more alike than different when it comes to big government, and stained records.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 4:37am@ Buck,
I get the feeling you don’t like Romney and would prefer Newt. I am trying to figure out why. I will use a little deductive reasoning.
It can‘t be because Romney’s stand on global warming isn’t as conservative as Gingrich, just ask Pelosi.
It can’t be because Romney is by far the worst flip flopper in the field, I mean have you seen Newt’s videos?
It can’t be because you think Romney is more progressive than Gingrich, I mean have you seen Newt’s videos?
It can‘t be because you treasure Newt’s personal ethics and convictions above Romney’s.
It can’t be because you believe that Newt is somehow more adept at creating jobs than Romney.
It can‘t be that you think Newt’s closet is cleaner than Romney’s.
and It certainly can’t be because you think Newt looks more Presidential than Romney.
So I give up, but sooner or later I will be able to figure it out.
Report Post »Jomil48
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 7:13amNeither Gingrich or Romney are consertitives, both would follow the sociialist path that career politicians have put this nation on. May God have mercy on our country, I want my grandchildren to know what freedom is, not have to be told what it was like.
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 8:09amThe worst thing possible is happening. Every Republican candidate is being discredited. Republicans/Conservatives are fighting against each other. Democrates are winning because of it. Can we find one candidate and stand behind that person? What about Santorum? Is there something wrong with him too? All the others have been bashed. Who is left?
Report Post »jkjk
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 8:31amSavage should give that million to Newts campaign. Romney is as left as clinton, and I’d like to see Savages bullet points on how obummer could take out Romney. The fact is, this crap is happening again, and we should be all blasting the loser we have in the white house now, instead of the exact thing obummer and crew are laughing and watching unravel.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 8:35amI wonder what all the fools who sent Savage $ for his “Legal Defense Fund” think about his offer?
Report Post »Emrys
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 8:59am@NHWINTER
Relax, take a deep breath. Now, this happens in every primary, in both parties, and it’s fine. Hillary and Obama did it to each other, and one of them won the presidency. Bush and McCain did it to each other, and Bush became president. This is how primaries work, always have, always will. However, I think Newt has taken your advice and been the ‘nice guy’ for most of this primary season, and he’s risen to the top, although many have fallen to make way for him.
Report Post »1389AD
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 9:05amMitt Romney is very much a progressive, much more so than Gingrich or any other GOP candidate. Mitt will never repeal Obamneycare. Moreover, as head of Bain Capital, Mitt gutted US companies and offshored US jobs. He would continue doing exactly the same thing if he became CEO of the US.
Anybody who is capable of being elected in any New England state will automatically be too much of a leftist to be qualified to be President of the US. The mindset in that part of the country is alien to anything that we could possibly tolerate in the South or in Flyover Country.
And yes, Mitt Romney would sell us, and Israel, out to the Muslims in a heartbeat.
What Savage is doing is bribery: openly offering a large sum of money to a candidate to abandon his campaign. It is morally wrong, and for all I know, it might be illegal as well. I wonder whether Mitt Romney or possibly the Obama campaign is paying Savage to do this!
Report Post »123456beatriz
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 10:00amSavage IS RIGHT!
Report Post »Indy1776
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 10:10amElecting Newt Gingrich is like sitting down in front of a poorly prepared meal. You‘re thankful you’ve been offered a chance to eat at the table, but you’re forced to hold your nose with every bite due to the stinch. That’s how I view Newt Gingrich. He represents everything that is wrong with Washington D.C. Old, growing fat off the taxpayer and out of touch with the real America. He looks like a snake oil salesman. A salesman so ugly and high and mighty, no amount of lipstick or pancake makeup could ever make him look good. Remember the ad with Newt and Pelosi on the couch? Pelosi looked sexy as sin compared to Newt. And you know it’s bad when the ultra left-wing hag sitting next to you looks better than you do.
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 11:15am@ READRIGHTHERE
Report Post »Good post. Positive and polite.
Your conclusion is wrong. If either Mitt or Newt are the Republican candidate, then I must not be a Republican. I will not vote for either man.
In case you’re going to theorize further, I am not a Paulie.
I wold support Santorum, Bachmann, Paul, or Palin.
lukerw
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 1:10pmOne Million… is just Newt’s annual jewelry fund, just for his wife!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 7:44pmVeterans are supporting a VETERAN….Gov Rick Perry
Report Post »Our military deserves a Commander In Chief they can be PROUD of and RESPECT
GOD BLESS OUR BRAVE MILITARY AND OUR BELOVED BRAVE VETERANS
http://www.rickperry.org/veterans/
G.W. Dobbs
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 8:17pmGrin-rich is a lying, thieving politician in the very image of Jon Corzine who spent 63 million dollars to become Senator from N.J., then parlayed that into a Governorship of N.J. and found out he could steal the MOST money by getting into BANKING where ANYTHING goes and all one has to do is DENY and FORGET where the 1.2 BILLION dollars are hidden; OK, he probably only got half of it but still… Grin-rich LIES and says he changes his mind—HA…when he was Publically speaking for PROTECTION for Fannie and Freddie, we now learn that Grin-rich was PAID 1.2 MILLION dollars. And that is only ONE of his multiple hidden, sociopathetic dealings.
ALL CANDIDATES are CFR members except Ron Paul. ALL CANDIDATES will follow orders of the CFR except Ron Paul and “they” will have Paul MURDERED if necessary to protect the Federal Reserve. God Save America from Satan.
Report Post »jpndhouse
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:04am@1389AD:
You are wrong about Romney buddy. Just dead wrong.
Left as Clinton? Moronic.
Doesn’t support Israel? Moronic.
No other candidate has criticized Obama more for his stance on Israel than Romney.
Oh, and yeah…sure he is paying Savage for this. Moronic.
Report Post »BubbaCoop
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:49pmIf Mitt or Newt are the nominee, what was the point of the Tea party?
Report Post »dmforman
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:04pmRight now, with Newt being the lead nominee, I wonder what the point of the tea party is. If Newt is elected as the Republican nominee, Obama will most likely win. Newt has too much baggage that hasn’t even really surfaced. They got Cain out of the way with no real proof, because they knew that he’d beat Obama if elected as the Republican nominee. While this idea is really stupid. I do hope that it opens people’s eyes to what Newt is all about before the primary election season.
Report Post »stifroc
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:40pmNewt or Mitt are not tea party candidates.
Report Post »The tea party candidates are being marginalized by the media, the Dems AND the GOP establishment! The GOP doesn‘t want a tea party candidate in there because they can’t control a tea party candidate. The GOP doesn’t want to scale back government… the GOP wants their turn at the helm of this bloated beast!
So the GOP is going to give us who THEY want, not who WE want. Bottom line.
your sensei
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:49pmThat is a REALLY good question. What is the point/influence/future of the Tea Party?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:54pmSeems that the DNC thinks Newt is TEA …. watch this video ….
http://www.teapartynation.com/video/original-tea-partier
Report Post »Pouncing Porcupine
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:57pmI’ve got nothing against the “Tea Party” per se, but, it is not a bona fide political party. Most “Tea Partiers” are Republican/Conservative, just like most Occutards are DemocRAT/Commie. I would recommend that everyone who identifies themselves with the “Tea Party”, forget Romney and Paul, politely reject Rep. Bachmann, etc., etc…and vote for Newt. He is our Ronaldis Magnis. He can defeat BamBam, but only if he wins the nomination.
I can‘t do a damn thing until I’m elected!
-Ronald Reagan
NEWT 2012
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:19pm@SENSEI
All good things take time my friend.
Rome didn’t burn in a day, ya know?
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:24pmyour sensei
What is the point of OWS except messing up the supply chain for the few remaining factories in America & making the lives of the people who work there he ll?
Have any OWS people occupied Marthas Vineyard or the Hamptons when the Obamas visit & so many bankers are there too. Could the occupy puppet stooges at least write down the tail numbers of the private planes & list the people who are at those 1% enclaves when Obama is there.
Report Post »MatthewChapter24
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 12:31amThe TEA party is like the Israelites of the Old Testament…they keep developing amnesia!
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 12:49amThe point was we would vote conviction, not fear, and it’s possible if we have a little faith and stop being cowards who would rather have any repub, even a progressive than do what is right. That to me is what the tea party is all about.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 12:51amBUBBACOOP, regardless of who gets the nomination the Tea Party will continue and only grow stronger . Whether it is Obama, Hillary, or who ever the is chosen by the republicans we will not stop our work. Our reputation has been damaged but we will not be silenced. After 2012 we will be dilligent to have our voices heard. If you think we will fade away I assure you that you are wrong.
Report Post »mrnoparty
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 3:25amBecause the Tea Party only came up with morons like Michelle Bachmann who has no detailed plans other than to repeat the same platitudes over and over and simply telling us with a limited record she is the only one who can overturn Obamacare. Oh really! Then how about giving us a few facts for a change other than the gaffes you are so famous for like Guardasil causes mental retardation and not knowing Elvis‘s birthday from the date of his death or having such a limited conservative background that you fail to realize that all conservatives backed the individual mandate in the 1990’s to block Hillarycare. Or failing to acknowledge that all those conservatives including Newt ultimately decided that was not a good idea.
Or someone like Rick Perry who struggled to spell cat after being spotted the “c” and the “a”.
Or someone like Herman Cain who was so full of himself he saw nothing wrong with carrying on a 13 year relationship (regardless of whether it was or was not sexual) with a woman and giving her money behind his wife’s back. Tea Partiers who supported Cain have no basis for trying to assume moral superiority over Gingrich.
So all you are left with is Rick Santorum and Ron Paul. And santoum got his butt kicked the last time he ran and Ron Paul is like harold Stassen of the 1960′s running but without any chance of winning as long as sane people vote.
So like it or not TP’ers. You had your chance & found little for anyone to get excited about. So i
Report Post »DragoonChris
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 4:09amAre you serious? Do the names Marco Rubio and Rand Paul mean anything to you? How about the numerous Conservative Governors we now have after 2010? I swear you would thank that getting elected President is the end all of Politics in this country, just cause it‘s the most high profile political position does not mean it’s the most important. Get a grip folks.
Report Post »jujubeebee
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 4:36amI don’t think the Tea Partiers brains are all exactly the same. They agreed on wanting Obama and his policies out but for anyone to lump all Tea Party people into one mold is ridiculous. Newt or Romney will be better than Obama~way better. I think there are too many people judging Newt on 15-20 years ago. People on here want a blank slate like a Cain but if he were the Speaker of the House 15 years ago he’d have more to criticize. Isn’t that blank slate what got Obama elected? We don’t need a saint for president~we need someone who can get the economy booming again.
Report Post »Jomil48
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 7:19amExactly, two RINOs
Report Post »idarusskie
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:47pmNewt was forced of of the speaker-ship by his own party because of the self centered jerk he is. He is not a leader.
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:06pmNewt was rammed out because he forced balanced budgets and pissed off not only the liberal left democrats, but the progressive republican establishement. Newt did the unthinkable. He drove through….legally, tea party ideas against the democrats and his own party at the same time. The only thing that ****** me off about it is that the sheeple think that Clinton balanced the budget four years in a row. Gingrich drug Clinton along by the cuff of his shirt crying an screaming to make that happen. Clinton got to rewrite that history.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:13pmTired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:06pm
Newt was rammed out because he forced balanced budgets….
==============================================
…….with funds taken from the Social Security trust fund:
“More recently, Mr. Gingrich vowed during a campaign swing through South Carolina last week to stop Congress from borrowing Social Security funds to balance the federal budget, saying it amounts to balancing the books at the expense of “American workers” and “retirees.”
But he failed to mention that’s what happened on his watch as speaker of the House from 1995 through 1998, when lawmakers used more than $371 billion in Social Security funds to balance the federal ledger and produce the overall budget surpluses that he now uses as proof that he is ready to “profoundly change” Washington.”
Report Post »http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/15/gingrichs-2012-platform-at-odds-with-planks-from-p/?page=all
Tired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:24pm@kidcharlamagne. Washington Post? Seriously? Anyway, It was a poor compromise that Newt did not want to do back then, but did under the political pressure. I believe he has learned that one cannot compromise on core beliefs. I believe the core beliefs have been defined now, damned the politics. That is why the republican establishment is so desperately trying to get Romney in there.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:37pmTired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:24pm
@kidcharlamagne. Washington Post?
=================================
No…..read it again…..
It says “Washington Times” (not Washington Post).
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:01pmSavage is 100% right. The Dems want Gingrich. Pelosi almost showed her hand early when she alluded to the fact that she has lots of dirt on the guy. Think about it…he has been in Washington 40 plus years and he is as corrupt as they come. He was found guilty of ethics charges because he lied to Congress. The guy,excuse the phrase, but he was known to be quite the horndog who had several mistresses and wives of whom he lied to and divorced. Gloria Allred is going to have a field day with this line up.
People say they know of all of Newt‘s baggage but they don’t because there is so much of it and it is true.The Dems are not going to reveal this baggage until after he wins the nomination and then the neutering of Newt will commence. It will be day in and day out Newt News. It will be a long and slow painful death for the GOP’s 2012 presidential hopes.
I want Obama out so I am voting for squeaky clean Mitt because I want this election to be about the Obama Economy and economics is Mitt’s wheelhouse and he will destroy Obama with his knowledge.
By the way did anyone know that Mitt graduated as valedictorian from Brigham Young and he also graduated with Honors from Harvard with a Law degree and an MBA. Maybe we could compare Obama‘s and Romney’s Harvard Law transcripts. That in itself would be entertaining. Maybe Trump could tease Obama about concealing his college transcripts.
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:02pm@kidcharlemagne. You are correct. It was the washington times. I still withhold my debate that Gingrich was rammrodded back then by both parties because he was a forceful enough individual to do what he thought the right thing was. I mentioned compromise and how I don’t think Gingrich is going to do that again. I like that. Conservatives have compromised with the demorats to the point where we don’t even know where we started from…..and that would be the Constitution and that was clearly based on our Creator. My fundemental issue with every do gooder is how do we change things? You can’t just eliminate 100 years of progressive beuracracy. Gingrich is the only one who has stated it takes thought and incremental steps. Think about it. I appreciate your posts. It would be fun to have conversation with you like many on this site. Many are antagonistic and on purpose. If I have ever sounded that way, I apologize.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 5:44amNewt was forced out because he spent four years investigating the President and the only thing he could pin on him was that he had sex with a consenting adult and lied about it because he didn’t want his wife to find out – something he could never be questioned about anywhere except Congress since it isn’t illegal and had no relevance to the ostensible purpose of the investigation. That’s why the Republicans lost the midterm election even though they thought right up until election night that they were going to win big.
Report Post »pennswoods
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 10:27amSpeaker Gingrich was totally exonerated of the nearly 100 supposed “ethics violations” the Democrats dreamed up to try and destroy him. Gingrich‘s Special Orders Speaches he gave each night in the early 1990’s after the close of Congress each day on C-Span educated people about our history and curse of liberalism and the evil of the USSR and Commnism. During this period Gingrich was hated by the Republican establishment for his brashness as the leader of the so called “young Turks” (which included today’s MSNBC Joe Scarborough who was a Republican Congressman from Florida at that time and a friend of Gingrich). As a reward for his leading the Reagan Revolution and in the 1990′s helping to give the Republicans the House and Senate Gingrich is stabbed in the back by some so called “conservative” radio talk show hosts who wowuldn‘t have their jobs today if it hadn’t been for all Gingrich did to advance the conservative cause in the 80‘s and 90’s.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:44pmIf Americans can’t wake up to Progressivism then 20 years from now there will be no Stars and Stripes; no Star Spangled Banner; no Founding Father History taught. But hey, you can’t grasp that concept because you think no matter how bad you are that it will all be sunshine and lolly-pops in the end because as most of you were raised by your politically correct scared parents (which is Sharia-law), no matter how rotten you were through-out the year you still ended the year with a lot of presents under the Christmas tree, and so you think it all will end good because that’s how you have been conditioned. You have a deep seated arrogance, because that’s how you were built. Way, way back in the old days, thinking spiritual people put Presents in the Tree, rather than at the base of the tree.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:56pmAnd then Satan Clause came along, and the American form of Sharia-Law, and then no matter how rotten children were the parents were pressured to give gifts, and as it became more and more gifts the parents wrote the lie “Santa Claus” on all the presents at the bottom of the tree (which is unto the bottomless pit). And now you are all mostly dead inside, and you think no matter what it will end in sunshine and lolly-pops.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:04pmAnd truly that is not love, and it actually means that you hate your children, but you can‘t handle having negative thought’s neither the tolerance to correct the source rather than the symptom, because most people are already stocked up on negativity, and run around smiling although they truly don’t feel that way in their heart.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:24pmAnd the thing that annoys me the most is that while I know the truth I even still have to not practice the truth that I speak, or it will destroy my family, or I will make myself a target of the Jerry Springer generation. And it is like that, that you have me surrounded, but not for long.
Report Post »BonnieBlueFlag
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:35pmYou wish we had 20 years. I say 10.
Report Post »Jomil48
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 7:23amyour way too generous with 20 years, if things don’t change soon, we will sit down with our grandchildren some day and tell stories of how it was to be free.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:41pmI’m sick of us cannibalizing our own when the true enemy is in the white house. I’ll take any republican in the race over what resides there now.
Report Post »BubbaCoop
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:46pmI’m sick of Conservatives settling. If Santorum, Bachmann, or Paul aren’t nominated, I’ll find a third party candidate. I’m done toeing the line for progressive Republicans.
Report Post »survivorseed
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:50pmThe only person who can beat Obama in this climate is Ron Paul. Newt, Mitt and any other nominee with a stupid name has no chance in the general election. Ron Paul would be the only one who could garner votes from those who voted for Obama in 2008
Report Post »Al J Zira
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:56pmI would be careful with that method of choosing a candidate. While I’ll vote for anyone but Obama the only chance we have of getting this right is to get a candidate that has strong beliefs in the country and the constitution. Don’t listen to polls about whose leading the voting, those polls are posted by the people that gave us Obama and would love having a Gingrich in office if they can’t have Obama.
GIngrich is Obama light. http://vimeo.com/6445068
Report Post »Gcopp6
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:02pmSavage is wrong about his Gingriches un-electability, I believe.
Report Post »If Obama was elected with his radical, socialist progressive agenda, as well as his drug use and clear lack of experience and direct ties with murderers and terrorists,why would Newt not have a chance. Especially with Obama now having a record of failure and horrible leadership. A tree should win a land slide victory against Obama in 2012.
Gingrich is a progressive as well. Or an internationalist. Real scary stuff. Look it up and follow the information. His books and spoken words, as well as his associations tell it all. I liked him considering his ethical and moral mis-steps. I figured time and forgivness was a fair consideration for me. But then I really took some time and looked. And though I would vote for him if I had to( anyone but Obama I believe) it would be upsetting to me.
doglady
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:14pmYou are right the real enemy is Obama and I would vote for Cheetah the monkey before I would vote for him but I would prefer one of the true conservatives ie Bachman, Perry or Santorum.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:27pmRon Paul???? Laughable
Report Post »http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html
CatB
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:58pm@BUBBA .. it is thinking like your that OBAMA is counting on. I say OMG — Obama MUST GO!
I will vote for any of the R candidates .. you aren’t going to get someone perfect .. and change takes time .. the Marxists have been working for 100 years (Wilson) to get in Obama. We can’t / won’t change it back in one election .. but WE CAN CHANGE IT IF WE WORK HARD and Don’t give up!
TEA!
Report Post »Voice_ofFreedom
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 1:12amI‘m tired of people saying that because I don’t support bachmann, santorum, or paul, that I’m compromising or settling. I don’t want bachmann. I don’t believe for a second she has the strength and fortitude to stand strong against the establishments of both parties not to mention the washington bureaucrats. The same can be said for Santorum. In my view he has a few things he is strong on but he doesn’t have the sheer force of will to fight through this. As far as Paul he’s so nutty he could put peanuts to shame. His ideas about foreign policy are a joke. You can get mad at me all you want but if you Paul supporters really believe that if we just pull back and leave the rest of the world alone there won’t be any attacks on America, then you are also insane. So for the last time, I am not settling…I am not just picking someone I think can win…I am not rooting for someone “in the middle” to get more independent support…I am voting for who I want and nothing else. If everyone does the same Obama will be going back to Chicago and that my friends is priceless
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:41pmGod Bless Michael Savage!
· WHEN HE WAS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, GINGRICH FAILED TO DELIVER ON HIS SO-CALLED CONTRACT WITH AMERICA.
· HE MADE ADS WITH NANCY PELOSI PROMOTING THE FALSE THEORY OF GLOBAL WARMING.
· HE’S IN FAVOR OF AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS.
· HE’S TAKEN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FROM FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC, TWO OF THE MOST CORRUPT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN HISTORY.
· HE’S CHEATED ON TWO WIVES AND LEFT BOTH OF THEM WHILE THEY WERE BOTH SERIOUSLY ILL, WHICH WILL DESTROY HIS CHANCES AMONG FEMALE VOTERS.
· HE CALLED THE REPUBLICAN PLAN TO REFORM MEDICARE “RIGHT WING SOCIAL ENGINEERING.”
· IN A PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE AGAINST OBAMA, REGARDLESS OF HOW WELL HE DOES, ON TELEVISION, HE WILL COME OFF BADLY COMPARED TO OBAMA AND LOOK LIKE NOTHING MORE THAN WHAT HE IS: A FAT, OLD, WHITE MAN.
God Bless Newt Gingrich for finding God but his twice adultry disqualifies him being leader of the free world. We must restore integrity to the Presidency!
Mitt Romney is a man of Integrigy, Character, and PROVEN LEADERSHIP!
This is the most important election in a century.
Please people be open minded and do some homework about Mitt Romney:
http://whyromney.com/
Report Post »BubbaCoop
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:44pmhttps://www.facebook.com/RomneyTheRINO
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:55pm@ ROMNEY2012
Report Post »mad_hatter_ is that you?
CS_GUY
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:57pmYou are a liar and a subversive.
You personally know nothing about Newt except what you read in a bias newspaper somewhere.
Your opinions are worthless.
Unless you have proof stop repeating lies about people you’ve never met…..
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:00pmDr. Savage did make it clear that HE thinks that Newt is not electable because the liberal media will take those talking points you posted above (most of them not true) and use it against Newt.
So who do you vote for then? I like Santorum and Bachman the most. But, they are not electable right now. Everyone talks that the liberal media wants Romney still. Why is the liberal media so pissed that Newt is coming up? Same question for the Republican Progressive establishment. They want Romney. Why are the Republican establishement so freaked out by Newt? Things that make you go hmmmmmm.
Report Post »SUMTHINSTINKS
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:10pmGO NEWT!!!
http://www.NotMittRomney.com
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:23pmRomney is a democrat in Elephant clothing. He is a dedicated RINO.
Report Post »jsciai
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:31pmCS GUY–You are a liar and a subversive. reply
Report Post »You call romney2012 the above, but then offer no rebuttle to his FACTUAL statements–many that came strait from Newt’s own mouth. So, are you the kettle or the pot, eh? Instead of committing libel and slander, prove your point with facts. But you can’t, can you. So, you resort to the old democrat paybook(see ayres) of criticizing the messenger and not the message. Shame on you. But based on some of your other posts I suspect your problem with Romney is not political.
justafollower
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:35pmWell thank u blaze for finally covering Savage. holy crap. I almost had an aneurism when I saw Savage in the headlines. lol. I’ll tell you, if Beck was to find himself some more drastic credibility (and Beck is as credible as it gets so maybe it doesn’t matter) he should align himself with savage… but that‘s just one man’s opinion ^*^ hope u caught that one! Beck and Savage together would be unstoppable but Beck is not as educated in the formal sense and Savage is far too arrogant for that to ever really take off but… hey! it’s just an idea!
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:49pmIt is a FACT:
NEWT GINGRICH COMMITTED ADULTRY TWICE, ONCE AGAINST HIS CANCER STRIKEN WIFE!
I dont care if he has found God. I am a Christian but I dont think a criminal should be immediately released from jail for simply saying “I found Jesus”.
Obama and Bill Clinton have cheapened the office of the Presidency. We cannot put an adulterer and his aldultering wife in the White House.
Does Integrity mean anything to anyone anymore?
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:31pm@ ROMNEY2012
Report Post »“Does Integrity mean anything to anyone anymore?”
This coming from a Mitt Minion.
Integrity does mean something. Mitt doesn’t have any.
KAdams
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 2:53am@Romney2012:
If the LORD forgave Newt his sins, who are you to judge that he’s not worthy of forgiveness from you? Are you better, or something? That‘s what you’re saying, you know.
Report Post »tweet
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 5:38am@ROMNEY2012
Report Post »IT IS NOT A FACT! IT IS BS!
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20111120/OPINION02/711209969
His own daughter wrote an article talking about that very subject.
Unless your definition of “FACT” is different from mine!
Tankertony
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:40pmWe wouldn’t be having any of this angst if Sarah had run. The race would already be over.
Report Post »jsciai
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:34pmAnd lost, sorry. (I do like Palin but there is no way in God’s green earth she would get elected. Just to polarizing, and that’s the truth).
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:40pmYes, shine the light on the cockroach named newt! Maybe you rino’s here will see who he really is.
Report Post »floridacockleburr
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:38pmHere’s a newsflash – if you can’t win the nomination, you sure as hell can’t win the presidency.
Report Post »JustJ
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:00pmAddendum to your newsflash… Only registered Republicans can pick the nominee. You have to consider the Independent vote, because you won’t beat B.O. without it.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but us Independents put our candidates through a lot more scrutiny. Personally, if Newt is the candidate, I will hold my nose and pull the lever for him. But it would be foolish to think all the other Independents will do the same. (Remember, they’re the reason B.O. got elected in the first place.) Newt will lose against Barack Obama. Savage is absolutely right… skewering Newt would be all too easy for the DNC, which is why nobody on the left is worried about him. They WANT him as the candidate because they know it easily means another 4 years for their messiah. as for Mitt Romney, I would have to hold my nose to vote for him too… but he CAN and WOULD beat Obama.
Report Post »IhaveOneToo
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:38pmNewt 2012
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:37pmHere‘s Savage’s full announcement (hitting Gingrich HARD on his past)
http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2011/12/savage-offers-gingrich-1-million-to-drop-out-of-the-race-will-announce-on-show-today/
Report Post »CS_GUY
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:01pmLet‘s comb Michael’s past with a microscope and see what turns up……..tired of celebrities mouthing off to get ratings increases..
Someone tell us a juicy tidbit about Michael’s past and we will smear his name in a like manner…..its commonly known as slander.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:12pmCS Guy . . . It‘s not slander if it’s true. Thats why it’s virtually impossible to slander Newt. It’s all true.
Report Post »BubbaCoop
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:37pmMitt and Newt should BOTH drop out of the race. Otherwise what’s the point?
Report Post »sooner12
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:36pmAfter watching GB this afternoon, I agree that Newt is not our guy. The Tea Party needs to regroup, stick to it’s guns and nominate a true conservative. Now hear me, the previous statement does not mean I endorse Romney. And our vote could “nudge” the Republican Party into the right direction. It could be the Tea Party’s chance to co-opt the ingrained in the Republican Party.
Report Post »survivorseed
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:47pmUnless Glenn tells you to vote for Romney
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:52pmI have followed Glenn Beck for a few years and subscribe to his site. I agree with alot of what Glenn say’s. I don’t agree with everything. Glenn’s issue with Newt is one of them. Newt is on the record stating that if you small government leaning people are serious, then you had better become serious about how that is done. Yep, I like eliminating the Energy Department and the Department of Education. Newt is on board with that. But, he has also said, how do you dismantle that which is already in place? Can you just simply defund it and leave a vacuum? I don’t think so. Where are all those folks with their degree’s and promised retirements going to go? The private sector needs to be set up first. Newt is on the record stating that. So, now what? It’s going to be small steps. Set up vouchers for private citizens to opt out of the government mandated uneducation. Think about it. Take vouchers to allow your child to go to a private school of your choice. I can imagine catholic, lutheran, baptist, episcopilian, any other christian oranizations booming on setting up schools and the individual would have the choice to send their child there. No issues with we can’t pray at school. The like minded will be there. Suppose there will be athiest schools set up as well. I’m o.k. with that. In the long run, we can raise our kids how we would like. Newt has great ideas. I think he’s smeared by the liberal media and not a progressive. He works with reality.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:01pmCatholic schooled kids are no smarter than the rest, but I am struck with how much better they were prepared for the workload. They do have vastly superior study skills/habits, all done with less money and no teacher union………..
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:36pmHe’s wrong, and Romney won’t beat Obama because Romney embodies everything that America is sick of; everything Hollywood has brainwashed Americans against (the spit and polished suit) and he is also a Progressive, and Obama will win whether it is Gingrich or Romney.
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:51pm@Eliasim. You know what? I happen to be a hard core Lutheran Christian Conservative. You know that orignal Martin Luther and the Book of Concord thing? Anyway, I’m a man of forgiveness and reason. I would like for you to review much of what Gingrich has been stating for the past few years. It’s all on line on youtube. Newt is not perfect. I have a gut feeling Newt has recognized his past mistakes. We all have. As I have stated earlier, Newt was driven out by the establishment on both sides because he was far to conservative for both parties when he was the speaker of the house. 84 charges by Pelosi and Newt conceded on only one to stop the drama. Things that make you go hmm. I may be wrong. Don’t know. I do know that Bachman was a member of a very conservative side of my Lutheran Church and out of political expediency chose to drop that association and take the easy road so she would not be labeled as extreme right wing. I find that a failing. It comes down to as the orignal Martin Luther stated, what part of the Bible do you want to ignore for your own interest? I see Newt moving in the right direction, and, most importatnly, I see little compromise with the dems, who demand us conservatives compromise over and over and over again until the starting point is so far away that we don’t even know where we started from.
Report Post »asybot12
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 12:17amActually to Tired of code Names , so what is your real name? If you are so righteous tell us, My name is Tobias Smit (tobiassmit@hotmail.com).I have posted here before and generally enjoy some of the banter but in your case the horse is a little high (I have a ladder for sale).
Report Post »rockstone
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:34pmNewt’s a whore Mike. No question. But $1 million? I think he’s a little out of your price range.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:41pmIn 1994 wasn’t Gingrich worth over 7 million? Whatever — 1 million isn’t enough for ole Newt. He goes for the big bucks — like in this new Ron Paul ad — we’re talking big, big money!
“selling access” Newt Gingrich http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI4DNtkF8nU
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:33pmI’ll drop out if he will offer me 13 Trillion so I can use it to pay off our national debt!
Bet he doesn’t even know I am running, does he? HA!
newt is not your worst nightmare, m s.
WE THE REAL PEOPLE ARE.
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 12:54amThank god for some one saying it!
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:32pmSo Newt is unelectable, Mitt is a socialist in sane persons clothing, so why can’t we just find some conservative, any conservative. I’d rather loose by a billion votes, than run someone that is just a slightly more conservative progressive.
Report Post »dk7
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:15pmSo is there anyone here voting for Rick San Santorum? When I heard him on GB, he said everything I agree with but the tea party seems to dismiss him, well I think he is the most conservative in the group along with Michelle. From what I gathered he recognizes the true evil of the cult of Islam and will deal with them accordingly, is fiscally conservative and will nuke most of the worthless government departments. I have found no major issues with Rick. All of the “controversy’s” are actually things I agree with! Now Savage, he claims to be a “conservative” or does he, not when he’s saying vote for Romney goodness. I stopped listening to Savage years ago he needs to retire to his boat with his dog.
Report Post »jpndhouse
Posted on December 14, 2011 at 1:15amHow is Romney a “socialist”?
Because he signed into law a mandate that was promoted by the Heritage Foundation? Man people are so dumb…
Report Post »drago
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:31pmThats right, buy off one progressive in favor of another, savage, your an idiot.
Report Post »OneofMany
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:30pmi like Savage, but disagree with his premise. I think Newt is the probably the BEST debater of the group and can stuff Obama’s mouth full of his own mess. Romney is ok, and I don’t have a problem voting for him, but I don’t think Newt is unelectable. I’d rather have Allen West in there…or Marco Rubio (?)
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:55pmAllen West, the one Beck thoroughly trashed in an article today (didn’t you read it) for pushing the “indefinite interment” of American citizens? and the antiPatriot act that led to it!
And Marco Rubio who wanted to get Georgia into the UN so they’d make us go to war with Russia that Rand Paul had to stop? Rubio was for the antiPatriot act as well and also voted yes on the “indefinite internment.”
They are both media-pushed GOP war mongers as possible VP to carry FL (which is needed for the presidency).
Report Post »OneofMany
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:34pm@Vechorik:
Ok, you got me… I haven‘t heard Beck on Allen West and I don’t know much about the Georgia U.N. thing, so I can’t comment on that. But since you used the term war monger, it sounds like you might be Ron Paul supporter.
Well, I love Ron Paul EXCEPT for his foreign policy… it is MASSIVELY OUT OF TOUCH with the realities of the day. The Founding Fathers had no way of understanding the urgencies of modern transportation and communication…it has brought everything closer and that means what happens in Iran DOES affect us and we DO need to be involved. Also the founding fathers NEVER envisioned NUCLEAR weapons…. they death with bullets and bombs… conventional stuff that has a relatively small kill zone… isolating much of the destruction of war to areas where you decide you can tolerate it. Not so with nuclear warheads and missiles and cell phone detonators…etc.. dirty bombs…etc..
Ron Paul will not get elected because of foreign policy..plain and simple. i agree with him on virtually every other area but will not be voting for him because he is out of touch with modern realities.
Report Post »breedofthe45
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:30pmProgressives are everywhere, Take the money Newt!
Report Post »SILAS
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:30pmno comment
Report Post »Laus Deo
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:29pmSavage is 100% correct. Gingrich, the right-leaning progressive, does not have my support.
Report Post »jeezpeeps
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:12pmHey folks… vote your heart and mind.. “We the people” have to speak. I don’t necessarily agree with any of you…. nor Doc Savage… listen to his show regularly. As I try to do with Beck, Hannity, and Rush. Opinions vary. But whoever wins the nomination… Paul or whoever… If we do not unite behind the nominee… then Obama wins another 4 years. Then maybe, just maybe… your next Presidential vote may not even be counted… totally worthless. Vote for the nominee no matter who it is. Need I bring up the name Perot?
Report Post »Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:29pmMichael Savage is awesome. This should play out in a very interesting manner. This should help portray Newt for what he really is!
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:30pmMichael is pretty good & so is Jerry Doyle.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:28pmI will buy one of Savages books if he will shut up and leave the country.
Report Post »Pouncing Porcupine
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:42pmGood one. I’ll second it.
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 11:29pmThere is competition on the radio dial for talk at every hour of the day except between 12am to 5 AM it is pretty sparse. Point is you don’t have to listen to him.
Border, Language, Culture
Demoncats & Republicrats or as on newspaper columnist put it “The Combine”
Report Post »His_Way
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 2:48amDarmock
Is his direct yet old fashioned and entertaining truth frighten you? Or do you prefer the politically perverted amoral pink fog version?
BORDERS LANGUAGE CULTURE
Report Post »oldguy49
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 9:28pmwhat price will you sell out your country?………….
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on December 13, 2011 at 5:46amI million sounds about right. There are a lot of other countries that are nice places to live, and where a million will go a lot farther than it will here.
Report Post »