Middle School Sends Out Racy ‘Pajama Day’ Flyer Featuring Lingerie Model
- Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:32am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Parents in Pittman, NJ got more than what they bargained for when they opened up an e-mail announcement about the local middle school’s “pajama day.” Right next to a cute, cartoon-like picture of a boy in a his pajamas was a giant picture showing a buxom Victoria’s Secret model in a bejeweled bra.
“God, are you kidding me?” on parent exclaimed to local Philadelphia station. Fox29. And that’s probably a common reaction.
But after some digging, Fox29 found the mix-up stems from a virus attached to the cuddly image:
From Myfoxphilly.com:
The Pitman Memorial Middle School principal says his hardworking secretary Googled the image of a child with the slippers and teddy bear for the flyer, and the picture of Lima was secretly tagged along, unbeknownst to her.
The owner of the picture used a hitchhiker virus, which was embedded in the innocent host image.
The school had no idea the image was there until the phone started ringing off the hook with outraged parents.
The principal immediately sent out a message apologizing to parents.
Websites add hitchhiker viruses to stop people from stealing their stuff. So, for the school, this is certainly a lesson learned.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 706 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 556 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 370 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 362 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 370 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 286 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (113)
Liberty7
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:50pmWow……wear your pjs to school day…….I guess condoms are optional………..the whole concept of wearing your pjs school is ridiculous and the school deserves all the grief this idiotic ad is generating.
Report Post »JediKnight
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:45pmSorry folks, I don’t buy this at all.
I happen to be a network admin. Not once have I ever seen or heard of anything like this happening. Images don’t just suddenly appear out of nowhere, virus or not. Many websites will send images through email so they can verify an address when you open it, but I have never seen or heard of an invisible “rider image” that suddenly becomes visible after it has been sent.
The persons computer may have been infected with a virus, but in that case all of their emails would go out with the same thing attached. There’s more to this story.
Report Post »brickmoon
Posted on February 8, 2012 at 12:48amYep. If there’s any truth to this at all, I suspect that maybe they hot linked the image in the email, then when the host discovered what they were doing after getting a bunch of direct links, they swapped the photo with the one that included the model.
Report Post »brickmoon
Posted on February 8, 2012 at 1:02amAnd I just realized I responded to a post from nine months ago. Putting links to very old stories on the front page, are we now?
Report Post »CARBON HOG
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:21pmlooks like PJ MAN can go back to school now….at least for one day.
Report Post »Coralchristie
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:20pmWhy do schools have PJ days? It’s too informal and inappropriate for school attire no matter what the intent. No wonder learning in America takes a backseat to “fun”.
Report Post »just happy
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:20pmthis is what happens when your school district employees either steal peoples copy righted stuff or have not been trained to know that copy rights mean something. If indeed the school employee stole this cuddly image, the school could be subject to fines!
Report Post »Warphead
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:18pmMore firings are in order. If you tolerate this then it will grow into something perverse. By being “tolerant” you are basically holding the door open to all sorts of perversion. It won’t all come a knocking all at once, it will be a little here, a little there. That’s how the sickness works. That’s how the pervs get into the schools, the scouts, the church, etc, etc…. That‘s how the pervs become emboldened and that’s how your child gets abused. We need to adopt the Barney philosphy. “Nip It, Nip it, Nip It In The Bud”
Report Post »Jimbo
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:18pmJust read a good article: http://iseedanger.com/stories/a2-chapter-one
http://www.therangersclub.com Join, it’s free.
Report Post »ColoradoMaverick
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:17pmQuestion: Why are our schools wasting time putting on Pajama days instead of just teaching our kids? We never had pajama days, crazy hair days, crazy socks days and all of the other things that serve to distract kids from learning. I get the whole thing about making learning fun, bla, bla, bla, . Just do your jobs and teach the kids. They can have fun after school.
Report Post »edcoil
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:16pmSecretly attached to a cartoon. Ya, right.
Report Post »Jimbo
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:21pmPerhaps that is a picture of the Secretary. And where is this school :-)
Report Post »TheGreyPiper
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:07pmYeah, it happens frequently. Now go evolve thumbs.
Report Post »Jimbo
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:09pmO.K. the article wasn’t very clear but the PJ Day was for real, the girl in the bra was an attached virus that wasn’t known to the school. The PJ Day was an email that was sent to inform parents of the event.
Report Post »outpost13
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:56amShows you how stupid schools are how about copyright infringement.
Report Post »ShyMan
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:55amMore results from the Public School Socialization Project.
Get your kids out before it’s too late.
Report Post »Marylou7
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:54amIt appears many of you didn’t even read this story. IT WAS A VIRUS……………
Report Post »ShyMan
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:02pmSchool and Pajama day was all I needed to read.
Report Post »Jimbo
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:03pmPerhaps you should re-read this story, the only virus was the sexy girl added to the email. The PJ day was real. Double check.
Report Post »hi
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:13pmThey should have sent a test email.
Report Post »ramburner
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 7:23pmYes, The virus was the school’s cover story for the horny secretary who posted the comments in the email, begging children to come to school dressed sexy so she could fulfill her fantasies about the children she sees everyday. Read between the lines people! Yes, this is what they teach our children. That’s why the rest of the world is now laughing at the USA. It’s also why so many go for higher learning schools in another country. Our schools can only teach our children how to hate God, hate capitalism, and hate our parents, but they do teach sex education very well and we “all” support planned parenthood abortion clinics, right?
Report Post »chips1
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:53amThe child molester union teachers have taken over another school.
Report Post »Benbit
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:49amHow about a read a book day, PJ day! This school should have better things for kids than a dress up day.
Report Post »juggernaut
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:47amAdriana lima is soooooooooooooo hot……. just sayin
Report Post »CARBON HOG
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:46amis that what the teacher will be wearing?
Report Post »Jimbo
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:45amSchool, “aint what it use to be”. Hey anyone know why Fox news is the only news agency using the word Usama instead of Osama? Is it because of the Saudi influence on Fox News or what?
Report Post »TheGreyPiper
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:06pmNo its because the leftards think when Fox uses “Osama” it’s really a code for “Obama.”
Report Post »smak
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:09pmThey are also the only news agency to use that idiotic term homicide bomber
Report Post »teddrunk
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:42am….and to think…I remember how hard it was to fantasize, in parochial school, with the girls in the school wearing those ugly plaid jumper? dress/top combination, way below the knee with a white blouse. The color was a kind of dull gray designed to keep the little boys minds on something other than girls.
Report Post »Mandors
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:41amAnyone wondering why a middle school is having something as stupid as “pajama day”? Grammar school? Sure. Middle, not. It’s just the kind of cutie thing that teachers think kids will like, when in reality the majority of them think it’s lame.
Oh, and I love how the principal coated over how his “hardworking” secretary lifted copyrighted material off a web page. You can bet if a student did that he’d be taking plagiarism classes for weeks.
Report Post »Jimbo
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:48amWe have PJ day here in Middle School as well. I don’t like it. Wish they would put an end to it. Not only are some PJs not acceptable for school, but it encourages what I hate the most. Girls wearing PJs to the store. It’s so slack. What are we teaching our children!
Report Post »stephenb.net
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:39amSo what does a bejewled bra have to do with PJ’s anyway? It doesn’t even make sense.
Report Post »VLADTEPES
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:37amDam, I would of went to school more often for dat..
Report Post »ShyMan
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:53amWhat’s a “dat?”
Report Post »IvanK
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:12pm“dat” be what he got ouda da skool. He and his posse gots smartz!
Report Post »BIGJAYINPA
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:37amOoopps. Gotta hate those hitchikers. However I would have loved to be a fly on the wall when those parents opened the E-mail. The initial reaction must have been priceless….just sayin’
Report Post »Mackerel
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:37amProbably one of the teachers posed for the photo.
Report Post »orkydorky
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:44pmWhat does wearing your PJ’s to school have to do with learning???? Why would that be exceptable to any parent???? Have we totally turned our schools over to a bunch of sickos?????
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:35amSo…..Victoria’s Secret meets middle school. Ooops.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:42amI‘m sure a lot of the boys in middle school peruse Mommy’s VS catalog every time it arrives in the mail, which is about every 3 weeks. I just wouldn’t want to know what condition said catalog would be in when the boys finally return it to its intended recipient………
Report Post »Iswingright
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:42amWho are these people (sick liberals) that take every opportunity to sexualize our children?
Report Post »TexasTBone
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:44amthis is what happens when you take God out of our schools
Report Post »stifroc
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:51amIt’s public education… so it COULD have been a lot worse! It could have been 2 lingerie models making out, or 2 men kissing, or an Abercrombie & Fitch photo.
It fairly obvious American schools have nothing to do with educating our children to be intelligent, or even critical thinkers. Had some exchange students from Japan living next door last year. They laughed at our education system. The only ones who don’t think our education system is a joke… is a majority of Americans
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 11:51amsick bastards
Report Post »afishfarted
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:01pmI spose I’m a tad synical on this. Like one post said “take God outta school–”. God has been taken out of society all together. This picture isn;t anything different that what the kids see on tv every day. So why are the parents shocked to see it in an e-mail? See my point? if they’re not shocked at what the kids see every day in their own homes, the stop the phony shock from what they see in an e-mail. Honestly
Report Post »beekeeper
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:02pmSo, let’s work through the logic of this – there’s a site where the “hard-working” secretary improperly downloaded an image of a girl in PJ’s, but the owner of the site she downloaded the picture from employs a “hitchiker” virus to try and protect his images…by embedding an image that he improperly copied from Victoria’s Secret?
Why, oh why didn’t the “hard-working” secretary a) not steal an image from a random website (“for the children” isn’t really a defense in copyright cases), b) not proofread her email before sending it to all the parents.
PJ Day is a fine thing to do in school, done right it can be a lot of fun for the kids, esp. when they see their teachers in adult-size, cartoon footie PJs.
Report Post »1TrueOne55
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:09pmThat’s what you get when you want something for cheap to no price from a graphics site… Serves them right… Maybe if they would have had a student use a school computer in the graphic arts class they would not have had this problem… Or would they?
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:32pmLike the kids don’t see more of these models on Tv than in the picture? Bet the parents don’t call the Tv station and complain about the commercials.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:36pmDid anyone read more than the headline of this story? It was a virus attached to a cartoon picture, not like the school intentionally put in the model. Sheesh. Let’s at least blame then for what they are intentionally doing instead of making ourselves look like a bunch of self-righteous hippocrites.
Report Post »ISeeDanger.com
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:45pmWhere’s mine?
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:48pmBlame it on the IT dept.
Report Post »Who would Jesus bomb?
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:55pmNow if I just had some Viagra I’d be all set!
Report Post »VegasGuy
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:55pmSo let me see if I have this right. They blamed the sexy image as a an unintended result of taking an image from another website? Their defense is they stole the artwork from another website? Unbelievable!
Report Post »coladude
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:59pmI remember this garbage from when I was a kid.
http://politicalbowl.com – Political Videos
Report Post »Mannax
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 12:59pmWhere was this when I was in school?
yes, I said it, you know that about half the guys on here thought it.
Report Post »TheGreyPiper
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:04pmUm, could some of you dingbats actually read the story and understand it wasn’t done on purpose?
Report Post »smak
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:06pm@VegasGuy
Report Post »So let me see if I have this right. They blamed the sexy image as a an unintended result of taking an image from another website? Their defense is they stole the artwork from another website? Unbelievable!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did you create that flag image?
the_zazzy
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:08pm@BIOHAZARD23
Report Post »Are you saying all middle school boys are horny pervs? That’s crazy talk!
sooner12
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:15pmAside from the obvious story, my question is why is the principal promoting a PJ day at school. How’s that learning?
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 1:57pm@the_zazzy, from what I remember, YES!! And frankly, despite moving up in years, some of them still are. Tee hee!!! :)
Report Post »Susan Harkins
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 2:13pmAnd more importantly…
What the “flick” do night clothes have to do with “a public education”?
What is being “learned” here?
ABOLISH THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION! Its very name is a farce! Either do this or, rename the dept to more adequately convey its intended role….say, um: “THE MINISTRY OF CORRUPTION”
Report Post »VegasGuy
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 2:25pmDid you create that flag image?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@ SMAK
I get your point. Nice try but you failed. The Gadsden flag has been around for a couple of hundred years, well beyond any copyright issues. It is now in the public domain.
Report Post »the_zazzy
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 2:37pm@BIOHAZARD23:
We can’t help it…it is engrained into our DNA!!
Report Post »TedsOfBeverlyHills
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 2:47pmYou idiots. The school employee isn’t a sick sexual freak. The secretary is a THIEF. And not a very smart one.
Report Post »KewlBigDan
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 4:25pmOK so it begs a few questions…
Report Post »1. Did no one at the school notice the Racy Photo when it was printed? Did they not double check the printed copy??
and
2. Did the website break copy-write laws by embedding a Victory Secret Photo with their cartoon. Do they have the right to distribute that photo?
3. How many middle school girls would have shown up dressed like that? and how many boys fantasies have now been dashed?
KewlBigDan
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 4:42pmok Re-reading it, I see it was an email and not a printed copy. My bad for not reading every word.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 4:47pm@ZAZZY, and that’s why we girls love you!
Report Post »Cesium
Posted on May 19, 2011 at 10:32pmIf you watch the video you see that this is a mistake…. it is not intentional
Report Post »jackrorabbit
Posted on May 20, 2011 at 1:16pmWait, I thought “sexting” was bad. Now we send home underwear ads with our kids? If my child was in this school, they would be home schooled the next day.
Report Post »