Miley Cyrus Incites Rage After Tweeting About ‘Forget Jesus’ Photo
- Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:37am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Teen idol Miley Cyrus knows a thing or two about controversy. The 19-year old singer and actress has a penchant for finding herself at the center of contentiousness. In recent months, Cyrus made headlines for creating a pro-Occupy song and music video. Additionally, there are those non-stop, pesky rumors about marijuana and drug use.
Earlier this week, the performer, once again, found herself at the center of yet another controversy — this time, it was a spat involving science, religion and Twitter.
The Huffington Post has more about how the incident unfolded:
The 19-year-old pop star and actress recently came under fire for tweeting the word “Beautiful” and a photo of theoretical physicist Laurence Krauss, with the quote: “You are all stardust. You couldn‘t be here if stars hadn’t exploded… So forget Jesus. Stars died so you could live.”
Cyrus’ haters and fans alike became enraged and wondered if the singer has given up her Christian faith, with some even telling her to go to hell.
Here’s the controversial image that Cyrus was commenting on:
The actress then went on to respond to her critics by asking, ”How can people take the love out of science and bring hate into religion so easily?” She followed this tweet up with an Albert Einstein quote and a statement regarding how saddened she is by the way the world operates when it comes to addressing science and religion.
“It makes me sad to think the world is this way. Like Einstein says ‘Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind,’” she wrote.
It seems Cyrus’ response is an attempt to merge science and religion, while railing against “hate.” Of course, simply calling something beautiful doesn’t mean she was endorsing it. But the fallout from her very simplistic tweet is certainly worth noting.
(H/T: Huffington Post)
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 706 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 557 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 371 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 362 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 371 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 287 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 363 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (684)
Moshy1
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:30amThis little girl never had any Christian faith to give up.
Report Post »chameleonx
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:34amWho gave you the right the say Who‘s Christian and who’s not. When I was younger I was a Christian and I gave up my faith for logic and reason.
rowdygirl
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:44amThat’s exactly right.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:46amNo, you gave it because of ignorance and lies spread by the left. If you look at EVERY policy pushed by the left, you will find at the heart a lie. Why would you think the Big Bang Theory, evolution and gay genes are any different?
Report Post »kcares
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:46amI was stupid when I was young too. Give her a break, atleast she is trying to read and learn and question. How many of you have always been a “perfect Christian”. What did Jesus said to the men trying to stone the woman?
SquidVetOhio
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:47amCHAMELEONX
You were never a christian. You pretended to be one, or perhaps thought you were. Going to church does not make one a christian. If you were a christian, you could not ever stop being a christian. Illustrating you vast ignorance of basic christianity.
Also, there is nothing illogical or unreasonable about christianity. I put down straw men like you daily. I grow tired of it honestly but, it’s my cross to bear.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:49amJust goes to show that at the center of every Religionist heart is a tiny core of hate. All it takes is one little mindstorm for the coronal mass ejections of vitriol to spout. If Miley had done the exact same thing, but replaced the word “Beautiful” with the word “Stupid”, what would the reactions have been? I submit that the turbo-Christians, who are now calling for her head, would believe her to be expressing solidarity with them, and the Scientificly minded people would just be like, “… who’s Miley Cyrus again? Meh.”
We don’t call for the death of someone who calls us stupid, or calls religion beautiful! But, to call for the death of someone who calls science beautiful or calls religion stupid, that requires religious faith.
BTW, Laurence Krauss is brilliant! I love him and I love that quote.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:53amAlthough, I will take issue with one word in that Laurence Krauss quote. That word is “all”. Not all elements are produced in exploding stars. All but one are produced in exploding stars. Hydrogen is the original fuel from which stars make all of the other elements. As such, stars cannot produce hydrogen. Hydrogen was produced by the universe as a whole as it cooled after the big bang and subatomic particles became cool enough to link up and form hydrogen themselves.
Report Post »Katydidnt
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:55amLogic and reason work because the universe was built in an intelligent manner. Logic and reason help us comprehend what is already there and already created. Each cell of our body, each strand of DNA, the very atoms themselves are so incredibly complex yet follow set rules.
Report Post »If you were to come across a lost civilization with a massive central library, sophisticated government which allowed feedback from every member but absolute dictates from leader, an ability to chemically breakdown just about anything and transform it into food, a medical system that adapted to new bodily threats, you would never ever say that this civilization happened by chance. Your own body is much more complicated than that.
We can split an atom and destroy an entire city, but only God can take all of that destructive energy place it in something as small as a hydrogen atom. God is not the author of the unexplained. He is the author of the explained and the yet to be known.
1956
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:01amSorry, but we all have our own faith journeys to travel. I was once a Christian teen. Then I went out on my own, and I allowed the world to corrupt me and turned my back on what I knew to be truth. But as I grew older, I began to realize that the ways of the world were killing me and making me into someone I didn’t want to be. I had to look back over my life to realize that God was there all along and that all I needed to do was return to God.
If Miley had had any Christianity in her… I pray that she finds her way before she ends up doing to herself even one tenth of what I did to me. As a Christian, Pray she will find her way. Don‘t assume she isn’t at odds with herself. If she is doing drugs, I can guarantee you she is fighting demons.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:03amActually, I guess the word I had a problem with was really “Every”.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:15am@ Katy Didn’t:
Actually, those rich sets of rules is what you would expect from a universe that was created mechanisticly, not by intelligent design. In intelligent design, that ancient library you mentioned would have many, many design flaws. Wings that juuust don’t match up with the geometry of the wings with which they are supposed to be perfectly symmetric. The books stored on their shelves, even and especially if they are not printed on paper, will have typoes and misplaced words, and poor word choice where other words would have communicated the author’s intent far, far more effectively.
These detailed flaws, tiny though they be, cannot be replicated by “a simple set of rules”. They require intelligence, which makes mistakes. The very precision with which the universe is put together belies the idea that it was intelligently designed. Rather, its precision augurs for mechanistic construction.
And the varying levels of perfection we find in biology also gives lie to the idea that we were designed by a higher intelligence, rather than evolved to fit our environment. The human eye has a blind spot. The cephalopod eye has no blind spot. Why would a loving god give his human creations a worse eye than that which he designed for the octopus and squid? The answer is, he didn’t, because he didn’t design us. We evolved through a finite set of rules to fit our savannah environment. The octopus evolved separately, but by the same rules, to fit its aquatic environment
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:24amInteresting points by Miley…interesting because the more that science investigates how the world really works, the closer they get to realizing that some concepts within the various religions are a factor in how our reality functions.
Einstein is right, and it appears that Miley is basing her own belief system not just on the blind belief of old religions, but on the verifiable FACTS being found in science.
To those who would chastise her for that, I call you hypocrite.
To Miley, I would hope that you’ll continue on this path and expand your mental horizons as you are doing now.
Report Post »chameleonx
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:28am@SQUIDVETOHIO: I would have to respectfully disagree. I was a “true” Christian who had faith in religion. Throughout the years I destroyed anything critical of Christianity and I forced myself to become a slave to my faith. When I left I was very rebellious. But as I matured I decided that I’m happy being secular.
Report Post »DeavonReye
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:31amSquid, please list the requirements for salvation, according to the bible, . . . not your denominational doctrines.
Report Post »Katydidnt
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:40amHollowPoints – It proves it wasn’t made by human intelligence which is indeed flawed. Things that are mechanical are created by something intelligent. Toolmaker was an important step from paleolithic culture to the neolithic culture.
Report Post »The mechanical qualities of the universe speaks towards a supreme and perfect intelligence. the sheer breadth of the universe and the fact that all rules still apply speak to enormity of the rule maker. If things were truly by chance there than they do here.
It was also not made by nature. Nature ever tends towards decay. That things are ever being recreated out of what was, speaks again to a powerful creative life force. With the exception of a few trees, just about nothing alive today was alive in 1776. We take the ability of life forms to recreate themselves as a given but to create life is one thing, maybe randomly occured with a lightening bolt, but for that life form to be able to reproduce is not chance.
proudinfidel54
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:43amChameleonx, sounds to me like you never had any faith and what you gave up was logic and reason.
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:54amDingbat …
Report Post »AmazingGrace8
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:54am@1956
Agree! I will pray for her!
Report Post »chameleonx
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:59am@PROUDINFIDEL54: Everyone has the right to their own opinion. In my opinion I had faith and I lost it. Now I see if there is evidence to support religion then I will believe in it.
Report Post »lynskinners
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:59amMiley, like many others in this world is searching for the truth. Truth exists independent of one’s ability to understand it. But it does exist. The truth is God. Hopefully she and the others will find the truth. http://www.questionreality.org/id13.html
Report Post »jdog777
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:03amChameleox…. What part of macro evolution, abiogenesis, and the big bang is logical and reasonable. ALL SCIENCE that counters these myths is drowned out. Where is the Scientific method in their political, progressive, humanist, and dare I say atheist agendas??
Report Post »remnantofjoseph
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:07am“And what will ye do in the day of visitation and in the desolation which shall come from afar? to whom will ye flee for help? and where will ye leave your glory?”
Report Post »Laymen
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:12amHey chameleonx, to your remark – “Who gave you the right the say Who‘s Christian and who’s not”; Jesus Himself instructed believers on this.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
There is your answer, weather accept it or not is your choice.
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:23am@chameleonx
IF you were a “true” christian, you would have God’s Holy Spirity indwelling you. You could not be converted as Jesus said, “those why my Father put in my hand, no man can pluck out”. Becoming a christian is a physical, spriritual event that takes place. That is why so many of us don’t believe christianity to be a “religion” it is a state. If you truly repent and convert, God indwells you for the rest of your life. You could never not be a christian. Because you may have believed in Him does not make you a christian. “Even the demons fear and tremble”.
I can’t tell anyone if they are a christian but I can tell you that there is no such thing as a former christian based on scripture.
Still awaiting the unreasonable and illogical tenants of christianity……
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:24am@ Lesbian Packing Hollow Points – you wrote: “Just goes to show that at the center of every Religionist heart is a tiny core of hate.”
Wrong. Talk about generalizations! Or do you truly belive you live on a planet where 99% of the inhabitants are hateful? I took you for a more reasonable poster.
While the vast majority of humanity falls under your umbrella of “religionists”, and while every religion at some point in history has got its hands dirty with shedding innocent blood – far and away the most proficient group of people at slaughtering humanity has been the “anti-religionists”. Though smaller in number, and only existing for a comparatively short time in history, political Athiests have killed multiplied millions of people.
One other notable difference: when a person claiming to be a Christian treats humanity with disdain – he has operated against the principles of Holy Writ – which teach that ALL mankind is made in the image of God, and also that the blood of Christ was shed for mankind’s redemption. Therefore ALL human life is inestimably valuable. BUT when an atheist mistreats humanity, he is doing no wrong – for his teachings claim that the unborn are just a clump of cells, that humanity is nothing more than a complex animal, and that life itself is a cosmic accident, and has no eternal value or meaning.
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:39amTo my christian friends a word of advice. When debating an athiest or an agnostic, when you hear the words, “How can a loving – God…..” you have won the arguement and there is no need to proceeed. This is ancient fall back argument when all else has failed. It is a straw man argument that is void of any understanding of the Biblical God. God is loving but, he is also holy and just. A holy God can not tolerate sin or else by definition, He would no longer be holy or just. He is also merciful, but on His terms not ours. They will not accept these truths so, if you make them, understand that it will be for someone elses benefit. They are not interested in logical debate. They are interested in persecuting our Lord like their predecessors. But, we still have to love them. That’s the irony. If my Lord can love those nailing Him to the cross. I can love those that mock me. But loving is not capitulating!
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:47amSo where did that exploding star come from and was it made of nothing and how could it have created atoms if it was made out of atoms. An exploding star didn’t create atoms. That’s why this guy is a “theoretical” physicists. Real physicists stick to what they actually know.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:48amabsolutely NO evidence that we are the result of stars exploding, going into super nova etc. There is absolutely no residual, theoretical or demonstrable evidence for spontaneous generation and for this to take place you need the right elements. Every lab that has said they can demonstrate spontaneous generation has had to use “help” from already available elements not around at the time they were required for any spontaneous generation to take place. Then we’ve got that little problem for evolutionsists…“the Cambrian explosion”. In a very short amount of time a huge burst of more complicated life (for the time) sprung up with no evidence of a mechanism to illustrate why.
Report Post »DeavonReye
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:49amIt’s interesting how he holds us to perfection. . . when he isn’t.
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:50amA real physicist knows that you can’t create something out of nothing. Even in theory this guy is incorrect. He says we came from an exploding star. … Where did that star come from? It wasn’t made of nothing, so how was it made and what was it made of?
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:55amAnother spawn of Samiramis is thrust upon us. She’s the child of the devil for this alone.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:56amLet’s be completely honest here. This is what’s really happening…Cyrus is reacting to words and sentimentalities, not actualy concepts. She sees “we’re all stardust” and in her female adolescent mind it’s a statement that is all “lovey” and “romantic” and gooey and treacly. This is why she was compelled to put “Beautiful” with it. Honestly…when we start looking to Miley bloody Cyrus for thoughts on cosmology, we are a culture in a lot of trouble. You cannot connect the explosion of stars to spontaneous generation there’s too many gaps to fill and too many convenient “let’s says”..it’s hypothesis and not anywhere near demonstrable.
Report Post »Jim S
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:01am..enraged?..really?…I thought only ******* reacted that way….sounds like another “broken news” report…keep stirring it, God forbid a thought different than yours be thought…that’s why God gave us a brain and reason…to not use them
Report Post »hereandnow
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:04amSilly girl… must have missed the teaching “remember man that you are dust, and unto dust you shall return”. Dust is dust, whether from a star or from the back closet.
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:31am@CHAMELEONX
These people are silly.
They will take someone who was raised a Christian, prayed to Jesus every day, read the Bible everyday, grew up in a Christian home, accepted Jesus as their savior and then in the process of studying to become a preacher, turn away from Christianity and say, “OMG HE WAS NEVER A CHRISTIAN.”
It’s just a way to protect themselves and their own faith which is understandable.
The problem with Christianity nowadays is that they care too much about someone else’s faith. OMG, it sounds like BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY!!!
Rick Santorum said Protestants were,“gone from the world of Christianity”……PROTESTANTS!
It’s a sick joke how loosely some people wield the sword of judgment. Amazing how despite all of their wayward swinging, their own judgment has never struck themselves.
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:50amLESBIAN PACKING HOLLOW POINTS
Report Post »I know you enjoy reading your own posts and feeling like you straightened us Conservatives out but no one here really cares what you think because you are confused with a liberal mindset. Do us a favor and move over to Kos. They’ll appreciate you far more than the rational folks here.
DeavonReye
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:53amMod, you are absolutely correct. . . . . And I keep asking them to provide the steps necessary for a person to be saved, . . . yet they don’t reply. I think it IS because down deep they know that a person CAN be saved, yet realize later that it was all a lie. Remember that “being saved” is an act of a person’s own WILL. Their ability to come to a decision about something they believe to be 100% correct. That is why “faith” is the only thing going for them, knowing that there isn’t any evidence for their beliefs.
So what has recently come up are preachers that tell their glassy eyed laypersons that “if you fall away, you were never saved in the first place”, . . . .which is a poor argument for their congnative dissonance.
Report Post »ConnecticutMusket
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 12:07pmWe can hardly blame her for her flip attitude on faith. She wasn’t raised to believe in a higher power. She’s the byproduct of todays culture. People need to take notice–greater notice— of the degradation of today’s youth. She’s a microcosm of the problem. Young celebrities and musicians have an enormous number of followers. So the degradation spreads easily and quickly. Other musicians do it daily. She’s no different. There’s even musicians promoting not just anti-faith, but anti-american sentiments on websites. Mr. Limbaugh mentioned this one a while ago: http://www.americagiveup.com. Total and complete garbage.
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 12:29pm@chameleonx
God gave us the freedom for @Moshy1 to speak his mind. However, since you are an atheist we’ll settle for the freaking US CONSTITUTION gave @Moshy1 to speak his mind.
You didn’t give up faith because of logic. You were simply brainwashed out of your faith.
Report Post »JGraham III
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 12:32pmIn the beginning God created the heavens and the earth….guess that stardust has God’s fingerprints all over it. It isn’t His problem if mankind wants to dispute the origin of all things, nor is it His problem if mankind wants to reject Him and His free provision for them. It does grieve Him at His heart however. Critics have come and gone and most of them have already returned to that “stardust” the oh so wise philosopher has declared is his origin. I prefer not to set my sights so low as that. It is far easier for me to take God at His Word than to descend into the turmoil that godless humanism unleashes on the poor unfortunate ones who embrace it.
Report Post »Ms Cyrus likely heard enough to believe but for whatever reason chooses not to follow it. Her decision; her responsiblilty to accept the consequences.
Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 12:42pm@ Treaty:
No thanks. This Conservative Libertarian Capitalist would fit in at the Daily Kos even less well than she does here on The Blaze. And my positions positted here are all Conservative in nature. Tolerance for Atheists, conserving religious freedom. Tolerance for LGBT people, conserving sexual freedom and the freedom of association.
It’s the hyper-religious who have a big-state, big-government mindset. “Let’s use the might of our majoritarian rule to make the lives of non-Christians and non-heterosexuals miserable. It’s easier to convert them that way than to take any efforts to step outside of our narrow frames of reference and understand a people who are different from us. Grrrr.” That’s a Liberal mindset for ya.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 1:28pm@lesbian… As you know, I frequently defend you from those who pass judgement on you.
Report Post »Now, however, I feel I must point out, “me thinks thou dost protest too much.”
I’m not debating you, though I disagree wholly with your big bang theory. I’m simply pointing out the lengths to which you are going on this subject, seem extraordinarily lengthy, relative to your usual posts.
I pray for you and for others. But it is not our place to judge, only to tell others of God’s word and plan for us all. It is up to each of us to accept Him, or to reject Him.
You will only ever find love from here,
Tom
NWWADD
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 1:41pm@ CHAMELEONX – You gave it up because I’m sure it did not fit your life style.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 1:43pmOh well now here we go…..I had many many questions regarding science, faith, and “hatred” but thankfully all my questions have been answered by Miley Cyrus, a 19 year old Disney has been. Wow what arrogance fame can produce in people. Most teens and young adults haven’t got a clue these days. Every time they open their collective mouths they might as well say, “Hey, lQQk at how stupid I am even though I think I know everything!” Billy must be so proud…..
Report Post »Leopold
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 1:55pmThis Lawrence guy has a few screws that need some tightening. And he probably worships his own “oh so beautiful” words. The really really sad part is that there are so many people who think this idiocy is “special”.
It’s amazing how many people cannot differentiate a religion from a person named Jesus Christ.
Christians do not follow any religion no matter what the name of the church one belongs to.
Christians only follow Christ and Him alone.
Report Post »woodyl1011fl
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:24pmmoshhy1 you are quite correct and chameleonx never was a Christian and now is given over to a loss reason and the irrationality of atheism.. Jesus Himself defined who is a Christian, John3:1-21; 14:21-24 and Paul in Romans 12:tells us what is imperatively important for us to do. It obvious that chameleonx has done what Paul in Colossians 2:8 warns us against. See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ. In 1 John 2:19 tells us what make believe Christian does.
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:26pmIt’s not us that she has to worry about. She will have to take it up with the Creator. If you don’t believe in Him then you will have to take it up with Him also.
Report Post »sdavidson
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:30pm@CHAMELEONX. who gave the right to say who is Christian or not? Scripture does. 1 John 2:19 says These people left our churches because they neveer really belonged with us; otherwise they would have stayed with us. When they left us, it proved that they do not belong with us.
A person cannot determine what is in another persons heart but we can certainly make an assessment by the fruits of the spirit.
Was she ever a Christian to begin with? It seems she professed to be one but there is no evidence now.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:48pmNo one really much cares what she thinks actually, as for her beliefs, let them stand. As for her Occupy support, I chalk it up to her youth, confusion, and wealth at an early age. However it isn’t too early for her to learn a valuable business lesson—her support of Occupy alone would keep me from handing her a dime on her movies, music or anything else. She tends to forget her core audience gets most of their money from their hard-working parents. That can be cut off in a heartbeat.
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:51pm@2SDAVIDSON
So you’re calling Miley Cyrus an Anti Christ?
Report Post »little big man
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:52pmMiley Cyrus—–she should do porn.
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:10pmWhat people DO NOT KNOW IS that her Father is a devout Christian, Billy Ray Cyrus.
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:14pmI don’t fault Miley Cyrus for being bamboozeled by big words – she’s just a kid. Albeit, a kid with millions and fame to boot.
Laurence Krauss, on the other hand, is a grown adult – whose reputation is based on his mind. Unfortunately, he is playing word games with religion in order to hype his own platform. More the mark of a desperate man than a brilliant one. Laurence intentionally marginalizes Jesus as less-than the fiery balls of gas we call stars, when the Scripture teaches that Jesus created the universe and everything in it, and also sustains it. See John 1:1-2, John 8:58, Colossians 1:17, etc.
By taking a swipe at Jesus in order to make himself look brilliant – Laurence shows himself to be uneducated about religion, and also possessing a fragile ego. Romans 1:22
Miley, you’re young, and you’re a songwriter – so I understand how you are drawn to verbal imagery… but if you are going to ever be credible as someone with a mind and who claims to have faith… I hope you commit yourself to digging deeper, so that you can discern error even when it sounds pretty.
Report Post »Pucci
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:14pmWhen I eat a great meal- I thank the Chef. I don’t worship the ingredients for “magically” coming together.
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:19pmchameleonx and anyone else who feels comfortable being who they are:
KNOW THIS: God is a loving God and HE WANTS YOU TO CHOOSE FOR YOURSELF WHOM YOU WILL SERVE. And, no matter who you serve, HE WILL STILL LOVE YOU UNTIL YOUR VERY LAST BREATH. So, if you had difficulty reconciling with your faith, it could be because the devil somehow used someone or something to twist it and ruin it for you. PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE and they will always err, even if they are good and righteous people. Why else would Jesus go to the cross? Yes, he went to the cross for me, who is still growing (still a Christian after over 30 years) and learning, but I also know that people can try to dissuade you from the truth. And those of you who have run from your faith, GOD WANTS YOU BACK – not man – God wants you back. HE is your Savior. Because we can make our own choices, the people who hurt you will have to answer to God, but in the meantime, ignore them and talk to God and get your faith straightened out. Pray and ask HIM to lead you to a good Bible-believing faith-filled church. OR, just read your Bible daily and pray for guidance. MOST OF ALL, ASK GOD FOR HIS WISDOM IN WHATEVER YOU DECIDE. And you still decide you do not want to follow God, HE WILL STILL LOVE YOUR DEEPLY. You may not get the rewards that follow those who do follow HIM faithfully, but KNOW that HE STILL LOVES YOU, EVEN NOW.
RIGHTEOUSNESS MEANS IN RIGHT-STANDING WITH GOD. Think about who you want to be.
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:20pmI agree with the quote, but having Faith is not a bad thing either..
Report Post »To Me being Christian is, treating everyone the same way you
wish to be treated, show respect and compassion.. but this is
Not seen much, in todays World..
the wireworker
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:28pm@ very hollow points you make
Actually, those rich sets of rules is what you would expect from a universe that was created mechanisticly, not by intelligent design.
It’s funny that you mention this because by your very post you admit to intelligent design. Anything that works mechanically has a schematic design behind it, a set of rules that it has to follow to perform the function it was “DESIGNED FOR”
1. These detailed flaws, tiny though they be, cannot be replicated by “a simple set of rules”. “FIRST YOU HAVE TO GET ME TO ACCEPT THE PREMISE THAT THE RULES ARE SIMPLE, AND YOU ARE RIGHT IN THE FACT THEY CANNOT BE REPLICATED BY MANS “INTELLIGENCE” ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY USE WORDS LIKE “MECHANISTICLY” They require intelligence, (DIVINE INTELLIGENCE) which makes NO mistakes.
Report Post »2. The very precision with which the universe is put together belies the idea that it was intelligently designed. Rather, its precision augurs for mechanistic construction. YOU’RE MAKING A CASE FOR AN OMNISCIENT, OMNIPRESENT AND OMNIPOTENT MECHANICAL ENGINEER
And the varying levels of perfection we find in biology also gives lie to the idea that we were designed by a higher intelligence, rather than evolved to fit our environment. The human eye has a blind spot. The cephalopod eye has no blind spot. HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT OUR BLIND SPOT DOESN’T KEEPS A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF LIGHT OUT OF OUR EYE TO KEEP US FROM GOING “TOTALLY” BLIND. by design a human sees what it needs a cephalo
Scott15sb
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:40pmLogic and reason dictate that God must exist. Everything there is, did not come from nothing.
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:44pmAnyone who thinks that science has all the answers is unscientific and possibly stupid. The more scientists learn, the more they find that they don’t know. At some point in the not to distant future, scientists will come to the edge of the knowable and realize it. What will they do then? Our senses cannot see, feel, or touch other dimension(s). Religion may become the real answer for scientists at that point.
Report Post »troymac20
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:45pm@ Littlebigman
Damn right she does.
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 4:25pm@POLWATCHER
You say that at some point Science will come to the point of the unknowable?
And that there is proof of a God?
If you are saying a God created everything…..then you are saying you know the unknowable….but then it’s not unknowable….it’s knowable.
Report Post »neffy812
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 4:25pmI love how hateful and judgmental The Blaze readers are. When I have kids of my own, in order to make sure that they remain atheist I’ll just have them read through the comments on articles like this. You definitely learn a lot more about the true beliefs of the average Christian by reading through these comments than you ever would from sitting in a pew for an hour every week.
Report Post »PickingCotton
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 4:51pmHere,here.
Report Post »the wireworker
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 4:52pm@ PUCCI
Report Post »very well stated, precise and to the point!
winterhead
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 4:56pmLesbianwithhollowpoints:
I’ve always asked this of Big Bang Theorists, what was here before and who lit the fuse and built the thing?. Steven Hawkins last month said that before the big bang time did not exist. Hmmm? There are a lot of unanswered questions here and both sides’ opinions are based on faith. But only one side admits it.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:07pmMay God forgive you little girl. Hope your father can forgive you.
Report Post »dudironimis
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:12pm@Swampy Big Bang Theory and Evolution I could see why people wouldn’t believe it, but the gay gene? Have you looked at gay people? Most of them don‘t even need to speak before you know they’re gay. People don’t look gay by accident, there is something in their genetics.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:25pmI have found, especially here on The Blaze, that there is a lot of hypocricy with Christians. Take for example the Christians on here that believe we need to preemptively strike Iran because it may be trying to get a nuke. It seems that Christians do not follow the teachings of Christ as he taught the Golden Rule. He said to love your brothers and enemies as you love yourself and to do unto others as you would want them to do unto you and most on here think the oppostite, that is to say, do unto others before they have a chance to do unto you. The opposite of Christ is Anti-Christ. Which are you?
Report Post »jcfmbjj
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:30pmThe truth of a creator has more logic and reason then you can even start to comprehend chameleonx. Dont believe me study Toptenproofs.com(at least listen to the samples, which im sure you wont because your scared of the truth) most atheist are.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:43pmThis issue with Molly’s tweet is that the phrase states, “Forget Jesus”. This is an obvious anti-religious statement. However, she tries to back out by stating the attackers are not using both faith and science. Well, dear, neither did Laurence Krauss find the beauty in both religion and science, as he is an Atheist and feels the two should be held separate.
Therefore, her defenses are quite contrary to the beliefs of the man she quoted and the meaning of his quote The fact that she calls it beautiful, means she is subscribing to the same beliefs. She now wants to demonize those for demonizing her. *Sigh*
She really is being quite pathetic. May be she would study religion, specifically the study of the Old Testament and theories of Rabbis regarding the duality of the nature of God and the fact that most religions think physical of an entity that is purely spiritual and energy. Why does it claim looking upon the face (not physical face like human – study Hebrew – the word means to be presented in front of too) they would go blind. She can also study on Ain-Soph-Aur (Hebrew for limitless light to which the force that is called God dwells). When seen as a force/power that brings creation and allows all things to exist, you see that God and science can be held hand and hand. It is all energy, which may or not be intelligent. The fact is that matter is neither created nor destroyed. It will exist regardless. However, it can be converted to energy.
Report Post »we.r.done
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:45pmMiley without her small talent is a never was, Nerver Was a Miley would be a great world
Report Post »Leader1776
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:55pm@Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Sorry but many of your points are hollow. First and probably the one that covers many of your others is assigning the term perfection to biology. Where did that come from? Biology has no basis in perfection. It just is. So when attempting to use examples in either the plant or animal kingdoms as examples of no divine intervention …………… the logic breaks down immediately.
Even laws of the physical world are subject to change. We recently have SOME evidence of being able to travel faster than the speed of light. Al may have been wrong. At this point it is safe to say (as stated in our former defense secretary’s last book) we don‘t know what we don’t know.
Report Post »Fried Okra
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:55pm@TomFerrari Very nice comments towards @Lesbian Packing Hollow Points I agree with you 100%.
I’m more of a lurker here at the Blaze… but, I do enjoy reading you both.
@Lesbian Bam Bam I just put in for my CCW and you seem like a person I’d like to have a beer with and shoot the cans after that (hehe).
cheers my blaze friends!
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:59pmYou combine this with the theories that the closer to the speed of light someone becomes… the more infinite the mass of the person would become. So, the amount of energy needed is infinite. This in mind, could this light and what is beyond be the infinite light of which Rabbi’s feel is the realm of “God”. This energy is infinite so it is always present and in everything. This is why Jews view there is no real hell as to speak of. there is only direct closeness to this source called “God”.
It is these philosophies that are beautiful, not someone who simply replaces a divine entity with only things they can see, touch and theorize in math. What is “God” is what is beyond their math. It is in Quantum Physics that tells us of the presence of chaos in a universe of scientific order. Where everything exists, and infinite probability is achievable. God does play with dice, and quite frequently. However, the dice are not as random as Einstein believed. It is random to the human which has a hard time dealing with probability based on physicality and not spirituality (IE what is beyond the limitless light and is infinite in nature). God will always lie in the unknown, as physicality can never explain it as it is beyond that.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 6:00pmSorry Miley not Molly… I am not a fan.. lol
Report Post »Quiata
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 6:34pm@LESBIAN PACKING HOLLOW POINTS (you means the points you’re making? Just wondering…)
Here’s another point to ponder for ya, babe:
“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass, GOD is waiting for you.”
Report Post »Werner Heisenberg, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Onowicit
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 6:38pm“The poet only asks to get his head into the heavens. It is the logician who seeks to get the heavens into his head. And it is his head that splits.”
― G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy
Atheism =Entertaining Fools
Report Post »cousanewa
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:22pm@at all of you.
Report Post »first of all i want to say i am 100% christian and don’t shoot me down or anything like that for saying it. i just want to say that for the most part some of you are right, but i will say that even in the rightness of it all it is still flawed. One can be a christian a real christian and then not be, but yes it does bring the question if they were really one or not. the answer is if they really did believe and repent and have faith then yes they were and still are saved, but have just hardened there hearts to what truth. and yes Chame everyone can have there own opinion, but someone may have the opinion of this blog articular not really being on this webpage weather that may be completely false, but there is a such thing as a wrong one.
If any of you say that the bible is in accurate that is false just for the fact that there are all the places and all the architectural city that have been found (such as Jericho) that just prove even more that it is true history proves that.
and the hate thing yes most “faiths” as you put it have a “hate” if you put it that way, but it is not the faiths it is the people we are all raised on certain beliefs that play into how we think weather or not we want it too.
and to say that evolution is real or Darwin’s theory is. i would say is flawed since by the end of it all Darwin himself said that there is a good chance that his theory is wrong. and as for evolution in general it to to a logical person well not make senc
cousanewa
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:57pm@at all of you (continued)
just for the fact that out of randomness and chaos (disorder) you cannot make order. it is just no possible and why have no scientist been able to remake the Big Bang, and if it is such a low posses for it all to happen over billions of years then how does a fish gill develop into a lung when any variations of it would kill it. and the same goes for a giraffe it would have died off with in the 1st 5 days of them being “Evolved” since there is no way for them, with there super long necks would have killed them there heart and arterys in there neck are designed in such a way that they will slowly let the blood go to there head and return other wise the massive pressure would instantly kill them when they get a drink. (it is just impossible) please e-mail me or contact me if you want to talk more (im getting tired and have many other examples and things to say and will be glad to talk i try to have a pleasant attitude so it wont be bad)
E-mail: u4itstars@gmail.com
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:07am@ Tom Ferrari:
Odd. I thought I was being rather measured in my participation under this thread. Being as I was not rising to every morsel of bait people tossed at me. My usual “post” is 2-3 posts of ~1500 characters in rapid succession.
@ The Wire Worker:
I choose my words with almost surgical precision. Mechanisticly is not the same as mechanicly. Mechanicly does, indeed, refer to physical mechanisms, but even that does not imply an invented mechanism with an intelligent inventor. When a flowing river finally erodes the last of the support out from under a tree, the tree falls. If the roots still have some purchase, the tree may pivot on its way down. Such pivotting would be a purely natural mechanical event… no intelligent design. The only intelligent design I admitted to was to the previous poster‘s ancient advanced civilization’s library.
In order for us to see an intelligence behind the design of nature, we would have to discover an actually designed mechanism in nature, such as an animal that had evolved any kind of rotary (multiple, full revolutions) body part, like a hummingbird powered by a turbine engine-like thrusting device. Other than that, we can only see mechanistic, of or like a mechanical devices, operations dictated by the set of rules we call Physics.
The rest of your post is purely grasping at straws.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:21am@ Winter Head:
I haven’t really delved into String Field Theory much. For that, I direct you to Michio Kaku. But according to the mathematical physics, the equations only truly become “simple sets of rules” for an 11-dimensional universe. Okay, so we truly live in an 11-D reality, but then why can we only see in 4-D? Three physical dimensions plus time. There is quantum indeterminancy even in the 11-D realm. When random events take place, some of them give rise to bubbles. These bubbles can have any subset of the 11-D space. Ours happened to take four. Like a Milliken oil drop experiment that forms a sort of physical 2-D “universe” on the surface of water. We could just as easily have had a 2-D, 5-D, 8-D universe, and out there in the greater multiverse, there no doubt are those universes.
So, we are living in a universe that had a cause, but that cause does not reside within this universe, just as the dropper that dropped the drop of oil into the water whose surface is covered with lycopodium powder does not exist within the 2-D oil bubble that results. When these bubble universes floating in the larger 11-D multiverse come in contact, they can produce more reactions. Some of which could result in new universes being created. There need not have been one Big Bang. There could be an infinite number of Big Bangs, each forming a completely new bubble universe of <11-D.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:39am@ Leader 1776:
CONGRATULATIONS! You’re the 100th person to try that insult.
yeah
It didn’t work the other 99 times either.
I do not believe I ever called any given example of a biological organism “perfect”. I referred to the different levels of perfection. I also don’t define perfection in this context the same way you define perfection in a religious context. Evolution doesn’t care about perfection. Evolution just cares about good enough. But even in this we can define the concept of perfection. If an organism evolves into a new form which is better suited to life in its particular niche, we say that its new form is “more perfect” than its previous form. And for the hard of thinking, no. We are not talking about a single organism, only the offspring of the offspring of the original organism through time. Is there some ideal, perfect, future form for the organism to which it is evolving? Probably not. To get a better answer than that, go read up on Plato’s Cave.
That which is better for an organism’s survival and reproduction is more perfect. That which is worse for an organism’s survival and hampers reproduction is less perfect. Since these things are highly dependent on environment, they are as fluid as the environment. What was good for an organism in one environment can become bad for the organism if that environment changes, so perfection is an ever moving and ever elusive target, but it is a valid target nonetheless.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:41am@ Fried Okra:
Report Post »Ummm. I think I’ll hafta take a pass on that offer, if you don’t mind. I’ve spent a lot of time in the lab, but I’ve never gotten alcohol and gunpowder to mix well, such that the results were anything you’d want.
Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:50am@ Quiata:
Aaaaaand number 101.
Don’t try to out-quote me, babe.
“Locke denies toleration to those who entertain opinions contrary to those moral rules necessary for the preservation of society; as for instance, that faith is not to be kept with those of another persuasion, … that dominion is founded in grace, or who will not own & teach the duty of tolerating all men in matters of religion, or who deny the existence of a god (it was a great thing to go so far—as he himself says of the parliament who framed the act of toleration … He says ‘neither Pagan nor Mahomedan nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the Commonwealth because of his religion.’ Shall we suffer a Pagan to deal with us and not suffer him to pray to his god? Why have Christians been distinguished above all people who have ever lived, for persecutions? Is it because it is the genius of their religion? No, its genius is the reverse. It is the refusing toleration to those of a different opinion which has produced all the bustles and wars on account of religion.” — Thomas Jefferson, “Notes on Religion” (1776)
I know wikiquote-fu.
Report Post »DuckHawk
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 1:11am@hollow points
Please explain how evolution produced the Golden Plover.
Report Post »Steve0218
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 4:00amI am not sharing this to comment on the Miley Cyrus controversy, it speaks for itself. However, as I read the article I found it very interesting what the physicist, scientist Lawrence Krauss states in this quote ‘we are made of dust’ and to ‘forget Jesus’. Often the statements that scientist make to deny our creator, actually confirms and corroborates Him. In Genesis 2:7 the LORD told Moses that He formed us from dust. How did Moses know this thousands of years before we had the scientific capabilities to know it? Moses never saw a car, plane, train or any fuel powered engine or anything of that sort, but he knew the form of our bodies-dust. How did he know? Lucky guess or divine revelation? With this in mind I can’t take the position of Lawrence Krauss to ‘forget Jesus’, but I choose to take the position of King David in Psalm (103:14-22)
Report Post »14 “For He Himself knows our frame; He is mindful that we are but dust.
15 As for man, his days are like grass;
As a flower of the field, so he flourishes.
16 When the wind has passed over it, it is no more,
And its place acknowledges it no longer.
17 But the lovingkindness of the LORD is from everlasting to everlasting on those who fear Him,
And His righteousness to children’s children,
18 To those who keep His covenant
And remember His precepts to do them.
19 The LORD has established His throne in the heavens,
And His sovereignty rules over all.
20 Bless the LORD, you His angels,
Mighty
Ayla_me
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 6:08amSo…..Who made the stars?? Who chose Earth to be in exactly the right place to be both protected and fascillitate knowledge of the universe? Who set the stars in their patterns, to be signs for people on Earth? Who made our star to be exactly the right dimensions and seperation from the Earth? How do DNA know what cell they need to replicate next? How can a DNA molecule have “evolved” if it needs everything it contains to begin with? How can the Earth be so balanced iin nature, i.e. plants need butterflies and bees to pollenate, birds spread seeds after eating fruits and berries, etc. etc., and yet each “evolved”??? Where did the nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, helium, etc come from in the beginning??? Please….someone with some intelligence answer these questions in a logical way, and I MAY consider Evolution as a true Theory.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 6:49am@ Duck Hawk:
Report Post »I don’t know, and unlike a Religionist with their own, revealed cosmology, I don’t pretend that I do. I’m a physicist. Go as a Zoologist that question.
JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 10:11am@ Ayla_me
The answer is that you are looking at the final stage of evolution up to this point in time. The plants, bees, birds, flowers, all evolved to be co-dependent based on hundreds of thousands of years. Because the flowers rely on the bee is not a sign that intelligent design is the answer and not evolution. Evolution is the mutation of cells over time as they adapt to their environment. This is evident in the different races (IE skin colors) and skeletal remains of humans over thousands of years. The remains show alteration in the human genes over the course of time, like less pronounce forehead, straighter stance in walking, and lose of hair (because our habitat is changing for outdoor to sheltered lifestyle).
In fact, the story of the Garden of Eden is not a factual tale (sorry – but in my studies Rabbis have stated this and I think them to be a better authority of this subject matter). It is a metaphorical story of man’s evolution, what sets man above animals. Our morality and the conflict between the nature of man (IE instinct) and the intelligence of man.
“Maimonides, one of the great rabbis of the Middle Ages, wrote that if science and Torah were misaligned, it was either because science was not understood or the Torah was misinterpreted. Maimonides argued that if science proved a point, then the finding should be accepted and scripture should be interpreted accordingly.”
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/jewsevolution.ht
Report Post »SteelRight
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 10:28amTrue.
Report Post »Concernd4USA
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 10:47am@cham Christianity is about a relationship with Christ. If you had one you would not go back to being secular, Because you would know that the relationship was true. You cannot just turn off the relationship and pretend it never existed. You probably had religious experience which is not the same.
As far as reason, I have news for you reason and logic do not lead to a secular conclusion, unless you deny scientific principles to do so.
I happen to be very well taught in the sciences 2 degrees and a 3rd one in the works. 2 are science related Engineering, and Physics. Both point to a universe of order not chaos. When there is order there is a designer, we call that designer God. To deny order is to not look at the universe properly. The reason science works is because there is order. Gravity for example is not random there is a mathematical equation that describes it precisely, this is why we can design planes and rockets that fly.If Gravity was chaotic you could not design a system that would work every time.
It is too bad that crusaders pretending to be scientists like dawkins spend more time dis proving something rather than improving things.
Report Post »jim1flyer
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 11:03am@LPHP: I usually read your opinion on this site and find some of it to be insightful and thought provoking. I don’t always agree, in fact I rarely agree with your comments but you’re entitled to your opinion. But to make a statement that at the core of every religious is hate, that is just ignorant and insulting. You always come on this site and preach to people they shouldn’t lump people into categories and then you make a stupid statement like that, shame on you. Guess I’ve been reading the wrong post all this time.
Report Post »WeNeedTermLimits
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 11:45amActually MOSHY1 and SWAMPY, it sounds ignorant to never question anything related to religion. Always blindly believing what you’ve been told and hating anyone who questions these things throughout their life to better understand their own faith and truth is the height of ignorance. What is wrong with reason and logic when it comes to God? Remember this quote from Thomas Jefferson:
“Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.”
Report Post »Quiata
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 11:46am@LESBIAN POSITING HOLLOW POINTS
fu?
Must have touched a wee nerve there. Here’s a nice thought-provoker for ya:
“For those who believe in God, a higher power or something larger than themselves, no explanation is necessary; for those who don’t…. no explanation will suffice.” -unknown
Toodles~
Report Post »Quiata
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:02pm@LESBIAN PACKING WIKIQUOTES
Allow me to defer to the quote-a-queen….deep bow.
Report Post »GodisaFarce
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:07pm@Watchtheotherhand What an arrogant statement you have made. All she was doing was tweeting about about this poster and saying it was beautiful. She was not trying to make a political or religious statement. But you people have turned something nice into something awful. That is showing complete stupidity.
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:18pmYou can merge science and religion.
Gee wonder why people of religion are turned off by science?
- “a star exploded and they released oxygen and other elements therefore, God doesn’t exist.”
- scientists DISCOVERED (enter hypothesis here), therefore, we are smarter and prove that God doesnt exist.
- We are the center of the universe, no wait… the moon is… nope ah… the sun ya ok, oh just a solar system? ok… oh its a black hole? oh dear… well alrght… well then the world is flat no wait wait… round and … ok the sun is not the center of the universe… ok and… ah…ah… we have 3… no …5 … no 7….wait… 9! We have nine planets! … oh crap actually its 10 maybe 11….. oh nevermind we have 8. Big Rip, Big Bang, Big Swallow?
Black holes… no wait grey matter… hold it its anti matter….
AND WE ARE RIGHT JUST HANG ON WE’LL FIGURE IT OUT!!!!
Oh and the Bible…. Pffft…. you know the world is going to be swallowed by the sun right? LOL I guess that proves your Bi… What? It says the world will be destroyed by fire?
… Its a myth….”
LOL
In short: Once you toss out the “therefore God doesn’t exist” crap, you find there is a TON of awesome stuff to learn. But its controlled, hand fed and supported by everyone that insists that God doesn’t exist (At least in the US it is). With their own history of learning about science, they deep down KNOW they are wrong to make such an abrupt assumption/conclusion. But they cant get
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:19pmTheoretical Physicist:
Report Post »Oh I wish I saw that, that’s new term for
Critical Thinker isn’t it?
(Translation: Communist idealist)
The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:21pm@kcares
if it was Obama it would be:
Report Post »“READY!!! AIM…. Oh shoot the cameras… uh.. He who is uh ..without sin… uh…”
ThatLeprechaun
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 2:07pmAnd what a shame because in doing so you lost all 3!
Report Post »Doris
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 3:16pmShe is an idiot. Always has been.Dads no better. Let her be an adult with a pea brain
Report Post »the wireworker
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 3:19pm@ hollow points
surgical precision…ha you gotta first learn how to spell before you can become a literary surgeon. that was my point relating to your library theory.
have you ever heard of a flagellum? it’s the beautifully designed rotary engine that you requested on a hummingbird, but actually it’s too small it can only propel certain cells. and anyhoo hummingbirds don’t need thrusters they have wings to propel them by design!
your tree theory is intelligent design, it’s called the circle of life.
i do not use straws so i do not need to grasp at any…
Report Post »mlimberg
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 4:03pmShe needs to give up the drugs, get a conserative education and ponder what the real world is like….
I’d say “education” in general, but there are too many Liberal in the University system to allow me to say you sould learn anything useful at a University anymore. It’s not the same as when this fossel went to college….
Sorry for the net few Generations…. it’s going to be their mess to clean up.
Report Post »survivorseed
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 4:34pmMiley, you’re not meant to understand you just have to blindly follow and ask no questions
Report Post »jeromy6979
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 10:46pmshe is not a christian. A christian does not deny Jesus
Report Post »SaveOurConstitution
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 11:36pmYeah, it’s sad that a person with this platform and audience has to be such a looser. I really admire Taylor Swift on how she lives her life. She realized when she got popular that girls looked up to her and proceeded to make sure she did the best to show how one should present themselves. She is one class act, and even though I am not a fan of her music she is number one in my book.
Report Post »SaveOurConstitution
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 11:45pmIdiots can say what they want. Didn’ scientists once say the earth was flat? The question for them is; if everything was created from stardust, where did the elements in stardust come from?
Report Post »SamFox
Posted on March 10, 2012 at 1:04amStardust? Lawrence acts more like he’s on angel dust.
He has no credibility till he explains First Cause. He is correct up to a point. In fact he agrees with the Bible, from dust we came & to dust we shall return. But he loses it by not answering the following Q-
So, Larry, where did the stuff that exploded come from? C’mon, some one can explain First Cause…
Can’t you?
As far as the young lady, those who call themselves Christians need to repent if you made any nasty comments about her. Some one left a quote by Gandhi that you nasty ‘Christian’ posters need to read & pray about. There is a lot of truth in it. If you call yourself a follower of Jesus [Yeshua] re-read the love chapter in Corinthians.
I am a Christian & some of these posts are appalling.
SamFox
Report Post »IntelligenceIsNotContagious
Posted on March 10, 2012 at 8:56am@ Lesbian Packing Hollow Points:
“Just goes to show that at the center of every Religionist heart is a tiny core of hate.” Every? Maybe by Religionist, you mean those who only care about religion as a club to hit you with, but those who truly are followers of Christ do not ‘hate’ in any way.
“We don’t call for the death of someone who calls us stupid, or calls religion beautiful!” Ok, so those Hollow Points you are Packing are just for show, right? You don’t intend to shoot them at anyone, nor to intimidate or threaten with your name…that’s just us right-wingers…
Discourse is wonderful, and I fully support your right to Pack those Hollow Points, by the way. Can we (both sides) stop the name-calling and the pigeon-holing? For either side of any issue to immediately state the talking points, means that we have not thought about the subject for ourselves.
On the point at hand, Miley’s comment: It sounds beautiful, it really does, poetic even, until you come to the ‘forget Jesus’ part… Let me walk you through an independent thought. Assume for a moment, that I were to say something opposite like: “God created the universe, and every atom in it. Forget Science, without God, Science is pointless.“ Saying something so dramatic as ”Forget Science”, would be met by the same outcry. The truth is, you can’t forget either Science, or Jesus, though you may try mightily. May I close with a non-hate-filled thought: Jesus loves you whether
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on March 10, 2012 at 3:21pm@ Qiata:
A play on “I know kung-fu.” I bit of humour which apparently eluded you.
Do you realize how stupid you sound when you continue flagellating the deceased equine and continue attempting to poke fun at my screen name?
Here you go for another religion quote. “Science without religion has no heart. Religion without science has no brain.” To which I would add, “But if my heart gives out, science can create for me an artificial heart. When a Religionist’s brain gives out, religion cannot create for them an artificial brain.”
@ Intelligence is not Contagious:
The hollow point rounds I pack in my sidearm are for bodily defense. They defend my corporeal body from harm by reminding bad people who would injure it that they possess a corporeal body of their own which can likewise be injured in kind. As these interactions between us take place on a website, vicariously, through our words, no such threat could possibly be construed as real or actual.
I could only intimidate my fellow Blazers, should I ever decide to do so, with my intellect, for it is the only part of me which survives the passage from my environs to yours through this medium. I, myself, can never be intimidated by the intellect of those who build their arguments on Bible quotes, which is the case more often than not when these “news” stories of science/religion come up.
Report Post »Quiata
Posted on March 10, 2012 at 10:07pm@INTELLIGENCEISNOTCONTAGIOUS RE: LESBIAN’S POINT ABOUT HATE
Ms. “I would like to really try and intimidate you but I’m respectably holding myself back” still hasn’t figured out (or won’t admit) the universal truth that EVERY human being has a primal core deep inside; to indulge Ms. Intimidating Intellect’s argument, we’ll call it the potential for “hate”. No one is immune. Even atheists, despite their lofty self-appraisals and proclaimed monopoly on logic, have the same human hardware and subsequent failings.
Apparently this sweet, kind woman needs to look in the mirror before applying that broad brush.
@LESBIAN PRESENTING HERSELF AS A BADASS Lighten up.
Report Post »felix
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:28amunion,communist teachers have done an excellant job on our idiot youth !!
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:32amWell said.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:42amBefore the begining of the Universe… there was TimeLessNess… then, Time began… and Energy came from the TimeLessNess to create what exists in the Universe… where the Source to the Universe is not In The Universe… and where, in Time, a Begining means all must End (where every Atom has a HalfLife). So, GOD (Infinite; Eternal) provided SOUL to preserve what HE Created!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:01amMiley Cyrus is clearly going through that phase Britney Spears went through. Cyrus wants to “bust out” from the clean, wholesome image that got her where she is today. But unlike Spears, her handlers keep her somewhat under control and keep her business away from the media while Spears became a complete and utter sl@g.
Report Post »ConnecticutMusket
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 12:08pmHere, here.
Report Post »bitter.clinger
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:15pm“We are stardust…” looks like this physicist clown listened to a little too much Crosby, Stills & Nash and Joni Mitchell. Science needs to stick to spreadsheets…stray from your equation and you’ve lost your persuasion. God made it all…God gave you the brain to peel the onion, but never forget that all your little pea brain can do is nibble around the edges of The Infinite.
Report Post »texasbeta
Posted on March 9, 2012 at 12:31pmYeah, and believing the magic man in the clouds created everything with a slight of hand is logical and makes more sense than tangible evidence. How classic. Oh, and your magic man is right and everyone else’s magic man, throughout the course of thousands and thousands of years, is wrong. yeah…totally logical. FAIL
Report Post »xoke
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:25amStop getting stories from HuffPo, Blaze. You’re killing my breakfast.
Report Post »single stack
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:20amI don’t really care what the little pea brain says about anything but the Krauss quote got me thinking. I’m well educated, having studied botany in college, my in-laws were professors at the same university, so I’ve been around a lot of very highly educated people. I have always been amazed at how shallow many of them are. They think they’re smarter than anyone else. They rarely are, they’re just more educated than most. That definitely doesn‘t mean they’re smarter.
Report Post »1956
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:06amMy question to Krauss would have been: Where did all those atoms to create the stars come from? Something had to create it before it became…. so how did it happen?
Something out of nothing. A lot of physicists will tell you the more they learn about the universe, the more they come back to God. Only those who think they already possess the mind of God will be arrogant enought to think they know bettter.
Report Post »happ77
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:28amSingle stack
Report Post »They may be more educated but like Reagen said, “most of what they know is wrong”
spirit of freedom
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:18amthe best way that there is to get way of track as a Christian is to hold your “education by man and of man” in the highest regard.. as the comments on here from some people prove. they are very Self important.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:17pmWhen I was in college, I met a lot of people who thought they were smarter than everybody else just b/c they were going to college but they really weren’t smarter than anybody else. College people just tend to be snobbier than everybody else. They were also very anti-Christian and left wing. But then once they got out of college, they either didn‘t find a job or found a low paying job and whined about how life isn’t fair and how they were owed something just b/c they graduated from college.
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:24pmI believe the word you want to use is WISDOM. They may be educated, but do they have GODLY WISDOM? Only true followers of Christ and those who believe in God almighty have true Godly wisdom. And, I will take HIS wisdom over man’s/SCIENCE wisdom, as man’s wisdom WILL ALWAYS FAIL……ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS.
Report Post »Nemo13
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:17amSell Hollywood, all the stars, pop tarts, liberal kooks to China. Give them a real reason to hate us.
Report Post »APD847
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:16am“Stars died SO we could live” seems to imply purpose.
In order to have purpose, the re must be a purposer to even speak ofa purpose.
However, this is the very thing young Miss Cyrus – and the egghead -are denying.
Sounds fishy from here. But then, I am just a human. Who am I to argue with
a star – celestial or terrestrial, used-to-be of a wanna-be?
Too bad she reads and believes her own press. bet she didn’t start this way.
Report Post »DeavonReye
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:27amIt doesn’t imply “purpose” at all. It is cause and effect. A star has a life cycle.
Report Post »sickoftalking
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:21pm@DEAVONREYE:
A cow **** on the ground to fertilize your food, and some of the atoms in your food came from ****, and now that **** is now a part of you. So you can say, a cow **** so you could live. And your hand is made of **** atoms. Its important to understand how the universe is all connected, but saying your atoms came from stars isn’t really any more poetic than your atoms came from ****… but its a staple of a kind of argument that deifies the cosmos, Carl Sagan
Report Post »JQCitizen
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:13amI really don’t think parents who allow their kids to “idolize” other kids are making a wise move in the first place. They shouldn’t be so disappointed when a distant pre-teen who’s been “taught” by her parents that the biggest life-value is making money acts without regard for things larger than herself. Where is THEIR influence? What investment have THEY made in THEIR kids to produce a respect for God, and His place in their lives?
These are the things they should be concerning themselves with.
Report Post »RationalLogo
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:40amagreed
Report Post »LukeSixFortyOne
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:58amI agree that parents shouldn’t encourage or even allow their kids to idolize other young, famous, and still impressionable children. It’s like putting your child in the care of a ticking time bomb because child stars are surrounded by enablers, yes-men and -women, and wanna-be hangers-on. First of all, most (not all) child stars don’t pursue higher education. Why should they if they‘re making millions of dollars and love what they’re doing? All one has to do is look at the long line of former child stars to see that the transition into adult acting isn’t an easy one. Start with Drew Barrymore (drinking and drugs at 9, rehab by 13), then go to Britney Spears (bipolar manic episodes of tattoos and shaved head; losing custody of her two boys, rumors of bulemia), and then to her sister Jaime who got pregnant at 16. There’s Macauley Culkin, Edward Furlong, Mary Kate Olsen, and the tragic Lindsay Lohan. Finally, the latest star with an eating disorder, self-mutilation, and anger issues is Demi Lovato, who seems to be recovering nicely. Now look at Miley herself. She’s fairly uneducated, her home life is unstable, and she’s got the freedom of an adult. She’s had tattoos since before she was old enough to, she’s been sharing provocative pictures of herself on the internet for years, and, most recently, she was videoed calling herself a stoner and photographed with her face up next to a penis cake. Not a great role model, but she’s just a 19 year old idiot. Let her be an
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:13amWhat kind of star do you think a soulless Disney start would create. For the record someone needs to let science know that the big bang is science fiction …not fact. Fact is no one knows or well ever know how it all came to be. How about ending the studies of a billion years ago and move it on to present problems. We have thousands of problems today and more to come as our population grows. focus on things like stronger more duriable crops for the future. Better affordable energy efficent products,renewal energy,…YOU STUFF THAT ACTUALLY MATTERS,.
Report Post »HOW OR WHY WE ARE HERE IS IRRELEVANT…WE’RE HERE AND THERE ARE PROBLEMS SOLVES THOSE BEFORE PONDERING THE WHAT IFS AND WHAT MIGHTS HAVE HAPPENEDS.
JQCitizen
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:22amYes, I agree. After all, he is named in the picture a THEORETICAL Physicist. I could postulate MANY Hypotheses starting from that point.
Report Post »Calm Voice of Reason
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:15pm@Smith: The thing that gets me about your comment, about finding ways out of our energy problems, is that new sources of energy are a large part of the reason that we are studying these physics. The discovery that large stars fuse lighter elements into heavier ones has a direct application in nuclear energy.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:47pmcalm voice of reason,
Report Post »There you go again that theory has nothing to due with Nuclear power or uramium fueled steam power to more precise. Observation from millions miles away on how a star burns are limited guesses.
I find no redeeming purpose short of establishing some sort of astroid defense and monitoring system for theorical astro physic. It‘s a great hobby who doesn’t like looking at stars and heavenly objects and he77 of job so is fortune telling especially if you’re predicting 20 30 years down the road.
Mr.Fitnah
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:08amTwitter getting peoples panties in a wad since whenever.
Report Post »Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.
grandmaof5
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:08amTake a look and a listen, we are watching the future Lindsay Lohan. All those years her parents appeared to hover and keep watch on the little darling, only to have her jump with both feet off the deep end. They had better take this as a wake up call or she will drown in the same pool as Lindsay.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:37amYou’re normally a pretty good poster here. Too bad you want to throw Ms. Cyrus on the ash heap merely because she doesn’t believe the way you do. She has a looooong way to go before she would become the drug addled moron that Lindsay Lohan became, and that‘s because Miley did have a proper upbringing which seems to keep her out of the majority of the problems you would wish on her because she doesn’t believe as you do.
Report Post »Livia
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:01amNo one is trying to throw her on the ash heap. Miley is doing it herself, and doing a great job of it. She is doing drugs that has been seen numerous times. It’s not a matter of her believing like I do, I don’t care about that part of it. In fact what this little trollop does or doesn’t do is nothing for me to worry about.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:16amSCHWER…GRANDMA is likely right. As Cyrus has emerged from her “tweenie” idol success she’s embraced pot smoking, has made raunchier videos and appears to be trying to “bust out” of the image she made her success from much like Britney Spears did. Will it take Cyrus storming into a beauty salon and shaving her head to convince you? For someone so willing to accept “out there” hypothesis you deny what’s in plain sight and demonstrable?
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 1:54pmC.SCH, I really am not concerned with her personal beliefs, they belong to her. Lindsay did not start out a drug addict, she became one over time; and as a mother and grandmother I hope Miley’s family (who hovered over her in her younger years) will intervene before she jumps into the same pool as Lindsay Lohan did. Country is my thing and I just want what is best for a very talented young lady.
Report Post »fourscoreand7
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:06amShe is 19, and high. There is another universe in the atom on your finger nail, didnt anyone learn from Animal House? Old man Cyrus has to be proud of his little nut. Isnt she due for a sex tape anyway?
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:39amInteresting points. Miley makes a few points based on her limited knowledge of the world, and you proceed to infer that she’s a slut…very CHRISTIAN of you!
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:06amI wonder how much she knows about quantum physics. /sarcasm
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:32amEvidently she knows more than the wacko religious extremists posting here.
Gonzo
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:05amJust another child star starting her journey into obscurity and missing attention she once had.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:58amShe’s a music and TV idol. Who really cares what she thinks?
… oh yeah, apparently fanatics who follow her twitter.
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:57amPhysisists work only in things very few understand? How do we know when no one understands it? No one understands Gibberish either and the crud they espouse is nothing but theory. Period. Theory only THEY understand which means it could be complete BS and no one would know the difference is what that means to me when guys like this and Hawkings ‘speak’.
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:59amoops Physicists .. doh.
Report Post »Calm Voice of Reason
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:07am@ Wrecking Crew: Many, many people understand the physics going on at the leading edge. If it sounds like gibberish to you, perhaps you should take the time to get to know it. Ignorance is not an excuse, nor is it a good place from which to launch criticism.
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:12amI didn‘t say I didn’t understand it so read a little better next time, you trolling leftist sack of shiite dumbazz.
“Member Since: December 20, 2011″ That makes you a johnny come lately troll to me and nothing more. Come back when YOU’RE educated a little bit troll.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:29am“I didn‘t say I didn’t understand it so read a little better next time, you trolling leftist sack of shiite dumbazz.”
I am compelled by your flawless argument and refusal to fall down to insults rather than educated discourse. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Although, please note that when you say it’s theory only “THEY” understand, it would imply that “YOU” are not part of “THEY” and thus do not understand it.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:56amYes, it seems there are some real problems starting to show their ugly heads showing the BBT is way more hopeful thinking than fact, yet the schools all teach it as law.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:48amThen I would recommend that you divest yourself of all the tools that these unknowing scientists have given you…starting with that computer that obviously shouldn’t work because some scientist spouting “gibberish” invented the principles under which it opperates. And you should throw away your CD and DVD player because the laser which is required to read the information on the laser enscribed disc you don’t believe in was invented by scientists who spout gibberish about such moronic things as “quantum mechanics”….the science upon which the invention of the laser is based. Throw away your current car and get a pre-70′s model since all modern cars are operated by computer…oh, and throw away your cell phone too since that’s nothing but “gibberish” too. In fact, WHY DON’T YOU JUST STRIP NAKED AND SIT IN A FIELD SINCE EVERYTHING YOU OWN TODAY WAS EITHER INVENTED BY, OR TRANSPORTED TO YOU BY A DEVICE THAT YOU CONSIDER TO BE “MERE GIBBERISH!”
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 11:08amPlease SCHWEHR….you know and I know there’s no credible evidence for what Krauss is offering. It’s not demonstrable and sits firmly and squarely in the realm of hypothesis. He might as well say little green men flew over the primordial earth and spinkled fairy dust into the slime and goo and VOILA..”we’re all stardust”-which by the way..some “scientists” do postulate on..with again..absolutely no evidence for it.
Report Post »goahead.makemyday
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 12:36pmA lot of times that “gibberish” leads to new technologies and discoveries that help humanity. And I agree they use of they means that you aren’t part of it.
Report Post »Calm Voice of Reason
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:18pm@Avenger: This statement is entirely demonstrable and is an everyday occurrence in particle accelerators all over the world.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 3:41pmNo CALM VOICE…it is not demonstrable. NO ONE has been able to demonstrate pan spermia or spontaneous generation. The labs that have said they can use elements that are available to today to “help” them but were not available for the life to generate originally. atom smashers do not demonstrate either of these at all. Get better material sport.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 6:49pmTo summarize @Avengerk
“Just because labs can recreate it doesn’t mean it happened! Get better materials, sport!”
Report Post »Nemo13
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:56amWho cares about this goofy looking bint? She’s just another pot head.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:53amAnd you know this how???????
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:45amHe probably knows it because she said she was.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:55am.
Report Post »I bet she leaves a Snail Wake…………….
mccracken
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:58amThey all do according to you.
Report Post »txwheels
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:54amSomeone care to explain why anything this dumb twit says means anything…
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:51amIt doesn’t….Ms Cyrus made a personal comment and it’s evidently a slow news week here.
Report Post »ilikai
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:53amSounds like someone has been able to fill her head with Liberal Mush, like the rest of the youger generation.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 1:39pmbetter than ending up being a mindless Christian robot like Kirk Cameron, at least she is thinking for herslef and not allowing a book compiled 1,500 years ago, based on myths told by nomadic goat herders do the thinking for her.
Git-R-Done
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 2:35pmEncinom – You’re not capable of thinking for yourself in the first place.
Report Post »Stevsea
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:53amUnfortunately, she will end up destitute like most child stars do.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:52amThe Dope is using dope. She is going to be another Whitney Houston. Godd riddance would be all I would say.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:16amDOGGY. Your hero Ron Paul would defend her right to use dope and be a dope. Both pretty much go hand in hand.
Report Post »DeavonReye
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:17amThere’s the love of god for ya.
Report Post »Obama>Jesus
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 5:39pmHow very Christian of you, criticizing and wishing death on another. I feel a Gandhi quote coming up.
Report Post »“I like your Christ. I dislike your Christians. They are nothing like your Christ.”
Dirty Harry
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:48amDitz.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:53amShe‘s ackey breaking her daddy’y heart.
Report Post »000degrees
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:55amAAAHHHH Molly who?????
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:47amLittle hiefer has a LARGE opinion of her own significance!
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 8:07amIn that regard she reminds me of Meghan McCain, fat, stupid and nothing if their daddy‘s didn’t pave their road to celebrity. They wouldn’t even matter to the left or anyone else, just like everyone else to the Chairman MaObama regime.
The lefties think they’ll get a seat at the Politboro if they carry the water but they”ll get whacked once the heavy lifting is done, then their idiocy is no longer useful and not tolerated by the regime like every other dictatorial state.
And lefties only dig em because their parents are conservatives or at least claim to be so they use em to defame their own fathers beliefs and these dumb TW__Ts fell hook, line and sinker. Like shooting walrus’s in a barrel!! ;)
Report Post »chameleonx
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:45amI cannot say if Cyrus is a Christian or not; however she has the right to her opinion. Personally I would support her if she would become more secular and critical of religion. I cannot agree with her on Einsteins quote about religion and science.
Report Post »Xyskalla
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:17amExactly. All the insults and name calling amaze me. People think they are defending Christ, but their un-Christlike behavior dishonors Him more than anything some atheist scientist said.
BTW, we don’t know the mechanism by which Jesus created us, it could have been star dust for all we know. But the minute Laurence Krauss says “forget Jesus”, he has left the realm of science, (since it can not be verified or disproved) and is now peddling his philosophy. If he claims that he’s being scientific, that’s bad science, since science can’t even address the issue.
Report Post »piper60
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 7:44amSomebody needs to help her. She seems to have been living inside a celebrity bubble for way too long. Perhaps a couple years at Hillsdale College.
Report Post »