‘Militant!’: Current TV Host Goes Nuclear on Obama Admin for al-Awlaki Drone Strike
- Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:23pm by
Becket Adams
- Print »
- Email »
During a Tuesday broadcast of Current TV’s “The Young Turks With Cenk Uygur,” the show’s host had something of a mini-meltdown as he discussed the details of the military drone strike responsible for the deaths of top al-Qaeda official Anwar al-Awlaki and al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son.
“Would you believe me if I told you that there was a U.S. teenager who grew up in Denver, who was executed without a trial with a drone strike?” Uygur shouted.
“Well, you might believe me if I told you ‘yeah, he was Muslim and he happened to be in Yemen and he was 16-years-old and he was the son of Anwar al-Awlaki.’ Now does that make it any better?” he, again, shouted.
Uygur then showed a Fox exclusive video of the 16-year-old boy.
“Militant?” the Current TV host yelled. “Militant! And you’re going to give a medal to the guy who killed him for bravery? When he was sitting in New Mexico or wherever he was and when he pushed the button?”
Seriously, do Uygur’s headphones need to be turned up? We can hear just fine. Please stop shouting.
“You know our government won’t even tell us if we meant to kill him or not!” he added.
“When Eric Holder was asked to explain [why a 16-year-old was killed in the drone strike] he said ‘well, it’s okay. We don’t have to give these guys trials. Due process is not necessarily judicial process,’” Uygur said. “‘In other words, we got together at the executive branch and decided bombs away!’” he added.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (129)
Verceofreason
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:40pmIf I was his father I’d keep him out of Yemen.
Report Post »akairey
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:58pmI agree with you! The “father” should NOT have had his son with him knowing that he himself is in danger and yet put his son dangers way. Because of the choice he made, his son dies as well. ALSO if you have your AMERICAN passport, I’m paraphrasing here “if you take up arms or join an foreign military, you relinquish your citizenship.” So as far as I’m concerned, Anwar al-Awlaki is no longer an AMERICAN citizen, so he’s free game!!
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 4:45pmIt’s call guilt by association! The son was getting on the job training. I’m sure the guy that sent in the droan would rather have a bonus on his pay check than a stupid medal. At Johnson & Johnson we had machine operators making $7.50 an hour and other operators making $15.00 an hour – it was called a incentive system and it worked pretty good. This was in Texas back in the 80′s.
Report Post »GlezeleVayne
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 5:40pmYou certainly are paraphrasing. Being guilty of treason is much different than relinquishing one’s American citizenship, especially for a 16 year old. Our constitution is all about due process.
I don’t know if Al-Awlaki’s son was an American who had taken up arms againtst America. Too late to find out now, isn’t it?
It’s easy to give free speech and due process to Americans we agree with or like. Once we deny those rights to American’s we have difficulties with, we deny them to ourselves.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 7:15pmThis liberal is a idiot. That said, flying drones and killing people with drones as you sit in some bunker on US soil is not a brave act. People who fly drones should not be given medals for battlefiled bravery. If you wanna call Afghans who use IED’s cowards (which is a fair statement) then the people who kill with drones are also cowards.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 7:24pmAnwar al-Awlaki dined at the Pentagon right before 911. He was INVITED TO HAVE DINNER AT THE PENTAGON. RIGHT BEFORE 911.
Dont believe me?
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-6978200.html
911 was an inside job.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on July 13, 2012 at 1:43amBigBrother (Socialist Liberalism)… alike “1984”… demands a Perpetual Enemy to fight… in order to Protect the people… and in SECURITY take away their FREEDOM! No Dirty Hands; No Dirty Energy; No Dirty Troops; No Dirty Pictures…
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:35pmI have ambivalent feelings about this. I understand the constitutional question of killing an enemy combatant who is American and his son without due process. My son is on active duty in the Army. I would not trade his life to apprehend al-Awlaki and al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son.
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:43pmHe could have been tried in absentia. If they had done that I would have gone after him myself. But this is nothing more than murdering a US citizen. No hearing. No trial. No evidence. No conviction. Just ONE man’s say so.
Report Post »Smoke ‘em and if anybody else dies in the process then they must be guilty by association.
German Dude
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:46pmBased on the direction of the current administration, today‘s patriot may be redefined as tomorrow’s enemy. We have to stand on principal even when it goes against what feels right.
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:33pmYou only have the rights you are willing to fight and die for. The constitution is irrelevant. The bill of rights is irrelevant and ‘conservatives’ are applauding the death of the constitution. Rex84, John Warner defense act, Patriot act, Homeland security act, National defence authorization act.
None of you will figure it out until they come for YOU! and they will.
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out–
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out–
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out–
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me
Report Post »AUsername
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:44pmI think so far first its the Muslims and than its the liberty lovers and than everyone else. this is the case in America right now.
Report Post »Leader1776
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 5:35pm@AUSERNAME
Report Post »Try again. Muslims, by this administration are a protected class
WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 7:18pmAUsername
If you think “liberty lovers” are bad. Then I am your enemy. I will do whatever it takes to get the word out and stop people like you. If I missunderstood your comment, im sorry. If I did not. Then again, you are my enemy. And a enemy of the republic.
Report Post »forthepeople
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:24pmThe Mafia successfully used family members ( no matter who ) to make people think twice against turing . All is far in love and war ! We did not start this thing , but will put and end to them and there misery .
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:28pmSo you’re advocating the Govt. act like the mafia? Nice! Which wars did you get your opinion that all’s fair from?
Report Post »snapperman
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:20pmThe guy who killed the 16 year old was – and is – sitting int he Oval Office, not in New Mexico. Is Uygur planning to vote for his reelection?
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:13pmkilling them is the easiest way out, put them on trial and prove them guilty and than put them in with big bubba, but the power to kill people without trial makes the president have the power of a dictator.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:18pmThey would have had Bush up on war crimes trial if he had used drones the way Obama has, or had the Obama policy of if they surrender, shoot them anyway.
Report Post »Wesley
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:09pmWhen you declare war on the USA and show that you’re serious by murdering several thousand innocent civilians, well you may suddenly find that bombs fly both ways. Anwar al-Awlaki a high ranking member of Al-Qaida showed that he was a coward, he was hiding in his 16 year old son’s shadow. Cenk Uyngur may be an idiot.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:27pmYou might consider the DHS report that came out around Independence Day and who the government believes are terrorists these days.
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:38pmWHERE is the evidence? Who is the judge that pronounced him guilty?
Report Post »The department of homeland security says that YOU are a terrorist.
The National defence authorization act says you don’t have a right to a trial.
See you at club Gitmo if you’re lucky enough to make it there.
justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 5:20pm@All pro, I got dibs on a bottom bunk.
Report Post »Nevermind
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:04pmSnowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Obama assassinated a US Citizen w/o any procedures of due process before the legitimate courts of the land; thus he is guilty of murder in the first. Impeach him and bring him to justice.
*****
First off Obama didnt assassinate anyone, he gave an order. Second, you lose your rights as a citizen the moment you wage war on the USA as part of a forien country or group. So while he was born a citizen once he joined Al Queda those rights are lost. But hey , I am sure the next time they can just capture themn and release them strapped wiht bombs in your backyeard and you would welcome them wiht open arms, right?
Seems you all Hate Obama more than you love this country. I dont care if you were born at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave , you wage war agasint the USA you lose your rights and deserve to die.
Report Post »German Dude
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:09pmThis is not a “declared” war. Current administration thinks it is John Wayne.
Report Post »rickinpa
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:28pmNEVERMIND First Off BY YOUR LOGIC Obama didn’t kill Osama either but he takes credit for that all the time. Secondly I don’t have a problem with killing terrorists and understand there will be collateral damage, but I believe this person is claiming Anwairs son was NOT A TERRORIST but an innocent American citizen who’s father was a terrorist. I don’t have a problem with that but would think the anti-torture libs would be going nuts. Thirdly the problem I have with all this was when Bush was doing similar things to protect American lives the Libs and OBAMA where constantly harping about terrorist rights etc. Remember Obama was going to close Gitmo? Remember Obama and his justice department wanted to give terrorists trials in NY? I don’t particularly hate obama I HATE ALL HYPOCRITES.
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:39pmThere is no war. If you say there is then produce the congressional declaration of war.
That’s what I thought you said.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 4:42pmOrdering the murder is the same as committing it. Just ask many of the mafia bosses in prison and murder for hire convicts.
Report Post »Hillbillybone
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:58pmI am a Hard Core Conservative and I am retired Military spending a majority of my time hunting terrorists clowns down, BUT I must agree with this story… I have said it before and will say it again, Alawki was an AMERICAN citizen who has rights of due process. Now my idea is bring charges on him, invite him to court, if he does not show up, that is his CHOICE, bring up the charges against him, either find him guilty or innocent, then if guilty, sentence him, if to death then go shoot amissle at him, and if there is collateral damage, well they knew they were riding with a man sentenced to death….BUT at least he would have due process!!! Alot of my military friends disagree with me on this, but as an AMERICAN, I would hope I would get due process before the gov. send folks to get me, which is what may happen in the future when they want to disarm or silence desent…
Just my opinion on this, and NO it owuld not matter if the President who ordered this was Dem, Rep, Ind, Lib, Green whatever party, I would still think the same way…….
Now let the name calling begin.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:07pmI think you sound like a good patriotic American who gets it. That‘s the name I’d call you.
Report Post »German Dude
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:08pmSpoken by a true American.
Report Post »jman-6
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:09pmAlawki wasn’t due,due process as he declared war on America,however his son did have a right to due process!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:19pm@Jman-6, If that‘s the way you feel then you reject god’s/natural law. It‘s a dark day in America that the people don’t understand freedom and liberty. Declare war on a TACTIC then kill PEOPLE without due process is wrong and a cop out.
Report Post »Polarized America
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:19pmHILLBILLY
Report Post »I agree with just about everything you said with one exception, Anwar al-Awlaki 16 yr old son was killed in a separate Drone strike ““Two weeks”” after his dad was killed. i don‘t know the details behind that strike but it doesn’t sound like collateral damage.
progressiveslayer
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:26pmPROGRESSIVESLAYER
Report Post »Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:08pm
Patriot
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:45pmHillBilly
I think you have it right. My son is on active duty. I would not trade his life to apprehend al-Awlaki and al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son.
I don’t know what I feel about the son. I have called in fire on a ville before knowing civilians were present. Collateral damage is a nonsense phrase. War happens.
Report Post »Coonshine
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 6:48pmI think you’re right on this. When the government doesn‘t want you around it’s time to look over your shoulder [can you say Ruby Ridge and Waco]. As for me, I’m wating to see who will be the victim of the first drone strike in the USA……..
Report Post »christhefanatic
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 8:00pmDue process of law? What”s that? What about Waco, Texas? …about 80 dead American citizens. What about “ fast and furious”?…more that 300 Mexicans dead and a couple of Americans as well.
Report Post »Face it…there is no law. Too bad about the kid but those drones are over our heads now.
blackyb
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:55pmLet him kill all of them. He ought to be good for something. Who cares, it means at least those two are not going to be plotting and plannin how to use this “American” Muslim to kill real Americans. It would not bother me one bit if they cleaned the whole region out and just camels were left and those who are loyal to America (if there are any.)
Report Post »lukeshop
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:54pmBottom line – - If you turned your back on the “16 year old boy” – - He would kill you!!!! His religion
Report Post »dictates so!! this is a no brainer….
WakingSheep
Posted on July 13, 2012 at 3:16pmIn that case we should have just turned him in to the ministry of truth.
THOUGHT CRIME!!!
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:53pmWhat is an American doing hanging around the enemy for? Why is this boy an American anyway? I don’t give a rats butt, myself.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:53pmAnwar al-Awlaki should have be captured, tried and then put to death. If he resisted upon arrest and was violent our office could have killed him as a result of self defense.
We don’t send bomb on our own US civilians. He had the right to due process than to be executed after a trail. This can not be justified. Not even mention the 16 year youth who was being indoctrinated and giving no chance to refute or repent from his fathers leadership.
This is not right.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:03pmI’d argue that the right to due process is a human right not reserved for Americans, but you’re right for the most part.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:08pmPatriot
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:51pmThis “long legged mcdaddy,” as James David calls Obama should not be over anything. He is as dumb and ignorant as Joe Biden and God help us to get rid of this liar and deceiver for his is an abomination to people.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:50pmAll of this cheering for having a president with the power to order a ‘hit’ on anyone anywhere is all fun and games until they start whacking American citizens on U.S soil.We’ve created an imperial presidency and some future president will eagerly kill a U.S citizen on U.S soil,no need for a trial they‘re so tedious and if you look like a terrorist that’ll be good enough to seal your fate.
The patriot act and NDAA are cheered for buy RINOS and dems and anybody else who doesn‘t understand the constitution and hey if some future president deems his political opponent a ’terrorist’ well……………….it might be a good idea to do your campaigning from a bunker,you won‘t win but you’ll still be alive.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:50pmHis father sure didn’t protect him from being a muslim. Was it “Take your son to work” day?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 6:45pmWhy wasn’t the son with his mother ? Why was he with his father ? Was he being trained by dear dad to be a future militant ? Let me guess…
Report Post »Salamander
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 7:14pmNothing more than unfortunate collateral damage! If you hang out with a terrorist, you might just share the fate of the terrorist! I doubt they were targeting the son in the car!
Report Post »Best_Patriot
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:46pmYou’d all be cheering if a Republican president authorized this.
A bunch of disingenuous bottom feeders up in here.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:54pmIt’s very dangerous to be a terrorist. Where was OSHA?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:54pm“You’d all be cheering if a Republican president authorized this.”
So true brother. Principles above party
Report Post »German Dude
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:55pmYou are clueless. Just like you lefties to think for me. Whoops that is what are current president is doing.
Report Post »TheEDGE
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:58pmB*tthead.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:00pmWrong answer horses A hole,the constitution applies to everyone R or D.
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:01pmHow nice of you to speak for the masses, fool
Report Post »Cavallo
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:05pm“up in here”?
Report Post »Yo, g-dog funky funk, Sup wit da street jive? If you noticed quite a few of the posters have no problems bombing his Jihadist butt. The amusing part of the story is that Current TV does have a problem with it, when normally they would be waiting in line just to have the chance to brown nose the first Gay Dog Eating President.
Gonzo
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:15pmWrong. I would be cheering if a Republican POTUS had captured him and stuck his head under water until he started talking. My ony problem with using drones to take out enemies bent on our destuction is that we get no intelligence from them before they die.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:31pmAmen GONZO. HORSIE speaks out of part of the picture he leaves out . The horse’s arse.
Obama created a dilemma for himself when he postured to the left about closing Gitmo and never closed it. Where’s he going to put these high value prisoners when they come over from Rendition (yes Barry preserved the policy he railed against Bush for)? There’s no other place to put them but Gitmo but if he puts them in there he looks like a laughing stock. So “tough guy” Barry chooses to kill them instead..depriving us of potentially valuable intelligence. Without being privy to the military’s decisions I suspect this is why Barry ordered “kill not capture” on OBL.
Report Post »This is why David Axelrod attended the “kill list” meetings. What possible reason does a campaign advisor have to be attending those high level meetings other than using them for political reasons?
helmuit_7
Posted on July 14, 2012 at 3:53amI know I have puposly been trying to ‘avoid’ alot of the news. Just to take a few steps back from it, to allow for a broader perspective of everything. But, what happened to cause the president to want gay dogs??? I haven’t heard the slightest thing about this… Did they start getting “fertalizer” from Blue Plains again? Did he find out about it after eating something from Michele’s garden and make a comment like, “Next you alls gonna be having me eat gay dogs” or something to that effect?
Report Post »Cavallo
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:44pmCurrent TV is still on the air? When do they plan on folding up shop due to their financial problems?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:49pmUncle George will float them a few hundred million to keep the afloat at least until the election is over.
Report Post »TheEDGE
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:42pmCheck this dirtbag out on U-tube. He foams at the mouth with hatred for anything close to conservatism. Scratch that. Anything remotely pro-American. Can you say terrorist?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:41pmObama assassinated a US Citizen w/o any procedures of due process before the legitimate courts of the land; thus he is guilty of murder in the first. Impeach him and bring him to justice.
Report Post »Cavallo
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:49pmYou have to try him in the Senate. He could murder a small asian child on the front lawn of the white house on camera and the senate is still unlikely to convict him.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:53pmHe is guilty of murder but the congress and Marxist regime in power are relying on two unconstitutional laws,NDAA and patriot act to justify their illegal actions.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:30pm@ progressiveslayer
He is guilty of murder but the congress and Marxist regime in power are relying on two unconstitutional laws,NDAA and patriot act to justify their illegal actions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Exactly. But remember, with this Marxist regime it only matters that “the ends justify the means”. It’s stuff like this that (I believe) is being used to change the thinking of people to “more accept” the NDAA and the Patriot act. I relate it to the taste of coffee. When most people first taste it, it seems bitter…..but after a while not only is it a necessity for normal function, it becomes acceptable. Put more bluntly, it may be difficult for some people to see through the bad principle because of the Muslim aspect.
Now, if the kid was what they say he was then we should have been able to make a better case and reasoning to achieve the same result through lawful principle without relying on the convenient, but unconstitutional dictates.
We are all getting to taste test and approve of our own potential poison.
Here a nudge, there a nudge……….soon, anyone who’s a “prepper” will be designated as a domestic terrorist and “Muslim” won’t have any bearing on the decision to attack or apprehend indefinitely.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:43pm@TSUNAMI-22 We are simpatico on this issue and these are scary times indeed,this government has way to much power and control over us because we’re headed for some nasty **** no two ways about it.
Report Post »piper60
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:39pmThe kid was with his father, the target. In the war on terror, there’s no such thing as “innocent civilians”. In point of fact, they haven’t existed since WWII.
Report Post »All Pro
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:53pmThree drone attacks in Yemen Friday night killed seven suspected militants including Anwar Al-Awlaki’s son, a security official said.
Carried out in the Shabwa district, where the younger Awlaki had been holed up for more than eight months, the attack comes just weeks after the September 30 strike that killed the senior Al-Awlaki.
The attack was confirmed by a senior security official in Yemen through CNN, who said he had first hand knowledge of the deaths, but was not authorized to speak to the press.
President Obama hailed the September attack as a “major blow” against the al Qaeda terrorist group, but has not yet made an official response to yesterday’s attack.
Read more: http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-10-15/news/30282831_1_anwar-al-awlaki-shabwa-yemen#ixzz20RKm1Ire
Report Post »cookcountypatriot
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:39pmcenk is dank
Report Post »edcoil
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:36pmIf you are born and raised in the USA and leave to fight against her – you deserve what you get.
You give up the Constitutional protection, you get the ones for the side you fight on.
Fight America – Die foreigner. Maybe you should have fought for our rights.
Report Post »RandomMan
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:43pmIt was the same results for the American-Germans that left Wisc to fight for the Germans. Like you said they asked for it.
Report Post »TYM
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:30pmLeave it to this mental midget to complain about the only thing the Obama administration has done right in the past 4 years.
Report Post »German Dude
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:28pmIt does not matter who is in the White House. This is wrong. American citizens deserve due process and this is not it.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:33pmHe was deprived his rights. I don’t know he was guilty. I know the liar in the WH said he was. Such blatant disregard for natural law by today’s politicians is disturbing.
Report Post »German Dude
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:42pmNo judge, no jury, no justice.
Report Post »Richiemond
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:45pmGerman Dude – your are a moron. Get a grip. Did the people in the twin towers get due process. Go to Yeman where you belong.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:52pmAgreed. Anwar al-Awlaki should have be captured, tried and then put to death. If he resisted upon arrest and was violent our office could have killed him as a result of self defense.
We don’t send bomb on our own US civilians. He had the right to due process than to be executed after a trail. This can not be justified. Not even mention the 16 year youth who was being indoctrinated and giving no chance to refute or repent from his fathers leadership.
This is not right.
Report Post »German Dude
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 2:53pmRichiemond, did Anwar al-Awlaki deserve to die. You bet, but this used to be a country based on law. That law was ignored for his 16 year old son. Doubt that we would have executed him here for the act of his father when he was 5. When they whiz the missile in your window because the current president decides in his eyes that you are a terrorist, hope your fellow citizens are good with it.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 3:02pmRichiemond, Did the people slaughtered at the Boston Massacre get due process? No, but the founders believed the British soldiers who were responsible deserved a fair trail. It’s a right, dude. “I know that justice is indivisible. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” . You mind has been warped by evil men, I suggest you think long and hard about your position.
Report Post »