Politics

Millionaire Elizabeth Warren Claims She Is Not a Wealthy Individual Who Owns a Lot of Stock

Millionaire Elizabeth Warren Claims She Is Not a Wealthy Individual Who Owns a Lot of Stock

AP

Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren turned a few heads after she appeared on MSNBC Thursday and declared she isn’t a wealthy individual who owns a lot of stock.

“I realize there are some wealthy individuals – I’m not one of them, but some wealthy individuals who have a lot of stock portfolios,“ Warren said on ”The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell.”

The issue with that statement is that Warren — who’s running against Republican Scott Brown — could be worth as much as $14.5 million, Buzzfeed pointed out. Financial disclosure forms show she and her husband own between $100,001 and $250,000 of IBM stock, and between $2.8 million and $7.9 million in TIAA-CREF funds, the Boston Globe reported. A Harvard professor, Warren earned about $700,000 last year, including book royalties and consulting fees, and lives in a house worth $5 million.

Warren was making the point that members of Congress either should not own stocks or should have them in a blind trust in order to avoid a conflict of interest.

Warren spokesman Kyle Sullivan told the Globe she was referring to not having a wide stock portfolio in individual companies, which many members of Congress do. He said Warren’s sole individual stock is in IBM, which she has held for decades. In an email to Buzzfeed, he said she would get rid of her IBM stock if elected.

(h/t Gateway Pundit)

Comments (189)

1 2 3 ... 5
  • miren
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:34pm

    Owning Stock is NOT EVIL. WTF???? It’s Business as usual. It’s the way companies grow. What’s evil is Ms. Warren declaring everybody successful owes ( I guess the Gov’t ) a percentage of their income. Well, that’s what taxes are for. Since Ms. Warren is RICH, who is she giving her money to for “them” helping her make her rich??? Let’s think about her double standards here.

    Report Post » miren  
    • bernbart
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:52pm

      The difference between rich Democrats and rich republicans, is a willingness to pay their share of taxes.
      There is nothing wrong with having stocks and earning wage good wages, or being rich, but there is something very wrong with paying only 12-15% in taxes. Besides most people with a brain understand the difference between net worth and actual wealth.

      Report Post »  
    • turkey13
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:11pm

      I‘m glad I haden’t taken a drink of Giner Ale when I read this or it would be all over the place. The last person that was poor than ran for Congress was Charley Rangle and you saw what happened to him when Nancy Polesi drained the swamp. I figure he was tainted before a year was up. They give you a mentor and they explain how Washington works.

      Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:11pm

      Owning stocks is not evil…Trying to fool voters by saying you are not rich when you are…Really evil. I hate liars…Like her opponent Scott Brown and how he lied to get my 100.00 last time he ran. If he is a conservative, that must make me God…

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • LIBSALWAYSLIE
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:45pm

      A liberal caught in a lie??? Of course, a lie is a liberals best friend, the truth is a liberals worst enemy.

      Report Post » LIBSALWAYSLIE  
    • notreally
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:24pm

      Owning Stock is NOT EVIL. WTF????

      If you’re a socialist — I mean demcrat, it is evil, even if you are filthy rich.

      Report Post »  
    • NowFrankly
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:30pm

      To Mr Berndfart:
      “The difference between rich Democrats and rich republicans, is a willingness to pay their share of taxes.” Really? I think that any rational person will seek to minimize payment for any good or service. Of course this for people who are able to make good decisions for themselves: like not playing in traffic or getting married before having children. Common sense stuff.

      You can improve your understanding of federal taxation. Do you know your effective fedreal rate? A married couple with a modest mortgage, filing jointly with an income of $122K, pay an effective rate of 10% to 12% in federal income tax. Variance in the effective rate results from itemized deductions for that filing year.

      PS: net worth and wealth are the same thing.

      Report Post »  
    • barber2
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:36pm

      BERN: Fuzzy Democrat math as usual. The capital gains rate versus regular income issue. Heard that parroted spiel before. Just so important for Democrats to stoke that class warfare issue ! ( Look at their urban militias : the anti-capitalist Occupiers . Marxists always want to punish the ” evil rich !” Did it in all of their past revolutions From the Bolsheviks to Castro . ) If all rich Democrats want to pay more in taxes, they certainly are able to NOW. Just send those checks in ! That is just the usual divisive rhetoric from the Democrats : 99% fuzzy math and 100% Class Warfare/ character assassination .

      Report Post »  
    • I.Gaspar
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:47pm

      Burnbart:
      That part about having a brain is something you’ll never have to worry about.

      Report Post »  
    • jenk99
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:59pm

      @Bernbart. Are you suggesting that rich people are paying a lower tax rate on capital gains, than poor or lower level incomes are paying on capital gains? That is simply not the case. Capital Gains rates are what we are discussing. The fact is, on Long Term Capital Gains, the two lowest income brackets pay a 0% rate, the rest of the income brackets pay 15%. With Short Term Capital gains, the rates are progressive, just like the regular income tax rates. Those with the highest income pay the highest rate. If John Doe makes $50K a year and has some stock to sell, no matter how you slice it, he will pay a LOWER rate than Warren Buffett or Elizabeth Warran.

      It is frankly a lie because they are comparing two different types of taxes. Some rich people do not have regular income, so they only have capital gains. So what? Their capital gains rate is going to be higher than capital gains rates of someone who makes $50K. Also, this whole argument suggests that lower level incomes couldn‘t possibly have capital gains and that rich people don’t have regular income taxes. Which is also untrue. for example in the Buffett secretary issue. They completely leave out that Buffett ALSO receives a salary for his position of CEO @ BH.

      Finally, the rich will ALWAYS pay more in taxes. While the rate may be a different kind, it ALWAYS more $$ than the lower income brackets are paying…ALWAYS. I guarantee that no secretary in this country is paying above $10Million in taxes.

      Report Post »  
    • georgiavietvet
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:05pm

      democrats LIE. thats all they can do. they never argue their position on the merits of their ideas. they LIE…………………………..

      Report Post »  
    • mountainmover101
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:08pm

      To Bernbart Humm Really? Might I submit the names of Warren Buffett, Timothy Geithner, Charles Rangel or Al Sharpton to name a few. These owing anywhere from a billion to thousands in taxes. All of which are Democrats. I don’t think one can make such a blanket statement as did you. I wouldn’t say that ALL Democrats were tax cheats and crooks based on these examples. I don’t condemn Ms. Warren for having wealth, making money or owning stock, but I’m not a liberal and certainly not a Democrat.

      Report Post »  
    • Komponist-ZAH
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:35pm

      “…there is something very wrong with paying only 12-15% in taxes”

      Why??

      Report Post »  
    • RightThinking1
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:40pm

      Will you folk never learn that BernFart is just here to stir the pot? For the love Mike, stop responding to it. It is your RESPONSE that it (he/she) is after, not thoughtful retort. Nothing that you might say will cause the scales to fall from its eyes. It does not CARE what you say, it only cares that you rise to the bait.

      Report Post »  
    • Unix
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:41pm

      This woman is a liar and a communist, she will get her just desserts! We will throw the liberal communists out of office on their ears.

      Report Post » Unix  
    • beekeeper
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:41pm

      @BERNBART wrote:

      “There is nothing wrong with having stocks and earning wage good wages, or being rich, but there is something very wrong with paying only 12-15% in taxes.”

      There is nothing wrong with paying 12-15% in taxes, if it’s done according to the rules.

      Warren Buffet an his secretary pay the same tax rate for long- term capital gains and income. As we‘ve recently learned Buffett’s secretary ears over $200K/yr, so she is paying the top marginal rate in her income (last dollar), just as Buffett is (I assume Berksire Hathaway pays Warren a salary that is at least equal to what they pay his secretary, over $200K/year, plus various other income from seats he holds on boards of directors and others).

      Warren Buffet pays 15% on all income derived from long-term investments, the same rate his secretary pays on any long term capital gains she earns.

      The only disparity is that Buffet earns the lions share of his income from investments, while his secretary earns the lions share of her income as wages.

      There is no indication that either Mr. Buffett or his secretary are cheating on their taxes – they are simply following the rules as spelled out in the tax code.

      Report Post » beekeeper  
    • doomytram
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 7:27pm

      Granny Bernbart – Sharpton don‘t won’t pay no taxes. Mark Pryor – John Kerry – Granny is wrong again. She spouts off get’s her ears handed to her and keeps coming. Your premise is refuted from jump again. Can you make less broad generalizations granny?

      Elizabeth Warren is an insider commie who has made money from Inside Government. She is going to get her ears handed to her in this senate race.

      Report Post » doomytram  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 7:27pm

      @BERNBART,
      There is no excuse for you Buddy. Filthy lucre is filthy lucre. What in the hell are You talking about?
      Elizabeth Warren is an insane Progressive…., AND she’s a 1%er! Tres HILARIOUS!
      She is one of the myriad of President Dunham’s posse who says,“Wealth for me but not for thee”.

      Stop with your inane posts a’ready. Got it?!
      Do you not understand Bernbart?! Your complete ignorance of reality lurks behind EVERY post you make!

      Why do you waste your malignant energy?

      Report Post »  
    • davrob1
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 7:32pm

      Bernbart below is a Communist.

      Report Post » davrob1  
    • TEXASGRANNY73
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:25pm

      Lets think about she was Obama adviser and he was going to appoint her a one man band Consumer Protection Agency where with she would be most powerful person in US with noone to moniter her except him. During Congressional hearings she told those questioning her she “had an appointment” and had to leave if I recall correctly. There was a dust up and it wasn’t pretty. (On the order of a Barbara Boxer moment–after she was called ma’am by a high ranking General). The Republicans called this woman a liar. This argument is not about money. It is about POWER. Obama wants that seat back and of course Scott Brown isn’t a conservative–it’s Massachusetts. I may not have agencies names correct but this woman according to Hayek would be a Marxist in my opinion. Remember how they always tell us we NEED to have their ideas explained to us? I may not be the brightest bulb in the box but I darn well know a snake when I hear or see one.

      Report Post »  
    • Weiners Wiener
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:27pm

      @MIREN — You completely missed the point. The article makes it clear that what is at issue here is the potential conflict of interest for any elected politician who is a shareholder of a given company’s stock. It has already been proven time and time again that our officials in Congress have a great deal more access than we do to the innerworkings of publicly traded companies, and that sets up an environment for unfair stock trading advantages we the public do not have. You need to read the whole thing before you start blasting comments out.

      Report Post »  
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:11pm

      Elizabeth Warren is a piece trash. Who in the right mind wold vote for such a nasty looking lady. Mean evil looking. GET LOST!

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
    • Jinglebob
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:56pm

      Lier, lier…panties on fire.

      Report Post » Jinglebob  
    • country_hick
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:20pm

      BERNBART;

      1 – Define “fair share” for me.

      2 – Capital Gains are taxed at what percentage rate by law?

      Report Post »  
    • bbhouston
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 12:31am

      Holy Moley….everyone is so embarrased to be living the American Dream. Everyone is trying to outdo everyone to be the ‘everyman’. Republicans and Democrats. And they are doing this just to get a vote. Where is the leadership….the proud American not trying to be something he/she isn’t? This country is drowning in political correctness, hypocrisy, and general BS.

      Report Post »  
    • loriann12
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 8:27am

      I thought it was the American dream to get rich enough that you could live off the interest? Capital gains had to be taxed the first time around, so when investment money makes you more money, it’s being taxed a second time at a lower rate.

      the problem here is the hypocracy. If Mr. Buffet wants to pay what his secretary pays, he can up it on his own, or pay his secretary less so she drops down to what I pay in taxes…about what, 12%?

      Report Post »  
    • Mateytwo Barreett
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 8:34am

      @Bernbat
      There is something wrong with payng 12-15% in taxws. Not nearly as much as riding the system for 25-35%!!!!

      Report Post » Mateytwo Barreett  
    • Jim S
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 11:06am

      mmmm, let’s see now, she a worth millions but can’t add and wants to get her hands on trillions of taxpayer money….she doesn’t know her own worth and wants control of the nations….yep a Democrat…

      Report Post »  
    • bdMarco
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 11:14am

      There is nothing wrong or evil about paying between 12-15% taxes on income made from investments, as long as that is the amont any individual is legally required to pay. Those rates were set to encourage investment, and it is the same percentage I pay, you pay or wealthy people pay. It also has to be remembered that people most often make investments with disposable income that they make after paying income taxes. In other words, most people already paid income taxes at a higher rate, took money that was left over, invested that money, made money, and have to pay taxes again.

      Report Post » bdMarco  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 11:35am

      She hopes to get in with Pelosi and Reid to increase her Net Worth..
      Nancy increased hers by 64% in ONE YEAR.. Tell Me they are
      working for US again !! Public Servants, MY AZZ !!!!!

      Report Post » MIBUGNU2  
    • jakartaman
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 3:54pm

      There is something really wrong about lying about her wealth!
      But that’s the democrat way – Remember Kerry and boat tax!
      hypocrites

      Report Post »  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 4:41pm

      Bernbart-
      The 15% capital gains tax is in addition to their income tax both state and federal. Maybe rich people should stop giving to charity and hand the money over to washington to waste on turtle tunnels and the like. The government is not a good steward of the money they collect, It is better for the ricj to give to organizations that actually help people and their communities.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • ishka4me
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 6:26pm

      This creepy lady is carpet nagging in Massachusetts. She seems to be on msnbc all the time now and she gives a creepy image. There are a few conservative talk radio shows that her mind numb robots call and make Howard stern type remarks. Lots of out if state professional campaign people in mass working for her. Would love to see more of her on tv because when people seeker of her foaming at the mouth spewing anti American hate

      Report Post »  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on January 30, 2012 at 1:32am

      My first thought was to call her a Bimbocrat, but that is really an insult to well meaning bimbos everywhere.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
    • THETAXMAN
      Posted on January 30, 2012 at 10:22am

      “Fair” is in the eye of the beholder.
      Low tax rates on capital gains is associated with the risk involved in obtaining the gain and in the time value of money(now dollars vs then dollars). We apparently do not measure risk “fairly” since the amount of risk involved in much of what is called capital gains is low and the time value differential is also often low. However, if we remove the reward for taking risk, we will suffer the consequences of the rich merely parking their money in some safe place where risk is nil (even though tax rates are higher). This will slow business startups to a snails pace and business startups is where “new” employment is found.

      Report Post »  
    • julias
      Posted on January 30, 2012 at 11:49am

      BERNBART, I’ll bet if you were rich, you’d be singing a different tune about “fair share”.

      Report Post »  
    • Noonien_Soong
      Posted on January 30, 2012 at 11:52am

      Elizabeth Warren in reality doesn’t have a chance to win the senate seat occupied by Brown.

      Report Post » Noonien_Soong  
  • workinghard
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:23pm

    Oh, it’s all relative. What she means is all of her friends are richer, so in comparison it‘s kinda like she’s poor.

    Report Post »  
    • CultureWarriors
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:29pm

      She’s a liberal Democrat. The only thing they know is lying. I look at her and all I see is a monster. I know she is educated so, that means she is well aware of many of the horrific atrocities that the Democrat party is responsible for. Atrocities such as slavery, abortion, segregation and the KKK. She KNOWS that is what the history of the Democrat party is and yet she still calls herself a Democrat. As a liberal Democrat she is a lying, racist monster!

      Report Post » CultureWarriors  
    • jenk99
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:03pm

      Some of these people actually believe their owns lies. Their reality is actually a fantasy, therefore they believe everything they say, because that is how it is in their “reality.”

      Report Post »  
  • mohavegreen
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:16pm

    Another “Limo Liberal” wanting to get to the congressional trough and get really become a “Fat Cat” in an empty suit. Listening to her is listening to Nancy Pelosi, neither letting the truth or facts get in the way using Montana jaw juice.

    Report Post » mohavegreen  
  • TreeTrimmerJim
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:16pm

    Which citizen of the United States of America is the most important? One citizen would have to be more important to have a class of citizens that are less important. The news is filled with “Middle Class”. Says who? The guys who wrote “We the People….”? Were the people who wrote those words using racial code or monetary code or educational code that included some and excluded others? Or did they say “We the People…” because they believed everyone got their rights from their Creator and believed their Creator endowed each with the right to pursue their choice of happiness. Is there an implied some people get to pursue happiness according to their class or any one can pursue their choice of happiness as they choose with the effort they choose to apply?

    Report Post » TreeTrimmerJim  
  • tbolt71
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:15pm

    as Rush pointed out the other day….the liberal rich just keep giving enough to the DNC to protect and prop themselves up from being targeted….look at warren buffet

    Report Post »  
    • jeann
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:59pm

      oh my gosh….well said……she‘s a radical Marxist and I hope people wake up before it’s to late.

      Report Post »  
  • Danzig
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:12pm

    She is NOT one of the 1 percenters. She is a 0.001% ‘er. Her professor husband earned $700K as a faculty member. No wonder tuition at that elitist university is so expensive. Those MA folk are so gullible if they vote for her.

    Report Post »  
    • AhLeahIris
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:19pm

      Hey, Massachusetts folk have been known to be gullible. Barney Frank and Teddy Kennedy come to mind, but also this guy, who was against McCain before McCain endorsed him: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-2gh

      Report Post » AhLeahIris  
  • barber2
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:06pm

    Just hope all of this anti-rich hate speech comes back to bite the Democrats ( many of them are , ironically, loaded) . They have created a division in this country over class/ wealth which is ugly and destructive. And, hopefully, they will be taught a moral lesson about the results of hate .

    Report Post »  
    • PATTY HENRY
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:14pm

      IT’S REALLY SIMPLE FOLKS: Ask Elizabeth Warren this: IF the RICH PEOPLE IN AMERICA got rich because they used the facilities that ALL of us paid for (Schools, roads etc) then …

      why

      aren’t

      all

      people

      rich?

      Could it possibly be that some tried harder? Some took more risks? Some worked more hours? Some were more careful in how they spent their money? I mean, if what you are saying is true…that the RICH PEOPLE GOT RICH USING the COMMON FACILITIES…then …then…then…why aren’t ALL people rich?

      See what she says to that…She has no logic; she is Socialist/Marxist/Atheist this explains her inability to connect the dots. SHE is part of the group that wants to destroy AMERICA and take our assets our very lives. This the THE GOOD vs. EVIL fight we’ve all heard was coming, folks. AMERICA is and has been GOOD…the best of HUMANITY. Satan wants to corrupt it and destroy it and he uses drones like this pathetic woman to do it. EVIL abounds now. BEWARE!!

      Report Post » PATTY HENRY  
    • UBETHECHANGE
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:28pm

      @PATTY HENRY Preach sister! God, truth, and love will prevail!

      Report Post »  
    • AmazingGrace8
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:16pm

      @pattyhenry
      great post!

      Report Post »  
    • Free2speakRN
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 8:18am

      barber2,

      These people are ‘lost to themselves’. They love money. They Love power! Their clouded minds are a menace to ‘common sense’. “The don’t care.” Once we ‘Know’ that, we know… anything’s possible. They simply don’t care. ‘End justifies the means. Silence and Ricicule.’ SA

      When it comes to these progressives, they could be billionaires, and they’ll cry poor. Hypocrites. Liars. And of course, scratch a liar, find a thief. When the rubber hits the road, don’t put them above Che, Mao, or Stalin. First they quote them…..

      Report Post »  
    • THETAXMAN
      Posted on January 30, 2012 at 10:26am

      Patty
      Will you marry me.

      Report Post »  
  • Netsurfer2
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:04pm

    Where’s Bill???

    She only has millions, but that still makes her poor??? Go figure! Yeah, right! Bill Gates senior also influences the government with his money and power! Like all Liberals who are rich, its the “We know what’s good for you!” syndrome!

    Report Post » Netsurfer2  
  • BIGGUNS
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:03pm

    Please understand these charity groups they support are family members or friends where they get it back under the TABLE!………..vacations around the world, high dollars dinners, gifts etc!

    Report Post »  
  • Wdawg
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:01pm

    Why are commentators so trashy on this site?

    Report Post » Wdawg  
    • bringiton
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:19pm

      Oh, I don’t know. ‘ cause commies exist?

      Report Post »  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on January 29, 2012 at 11:48am

      Why is this Administration so corrupt ????
      Do You like the Hope and Change ????

      Report Post » MIBUGNU2  
  • RightThinking1
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:00pm

    He, he…, I‘ll bet one of ’Lizabeth’s funds has/had some Freddie/Fannie..
    Perhaps we can get Wolf Blitzer to ask about that….

    Report Post »  
  • Look4DBigPicture
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:59pm

    What a hypocrite … but not surprising. She’s always seen herself as being above all others, while pretending to be concerned about those beneath her. The sad thing is … there are actually people out there dumb enough to believe her.

    Report Post »  
  • South Philly Boy
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:57pm

    She is a poor lady… Oh my

    Report Post » South Philly Boy  
  • barber2
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:56pm

    Expecting something different from the Crazy Math (99/ 1 % ) Crowd ?? She is a Democrat ! They tell Big Lies. The Dominant Media never challenges them. So they keep telling those Big Lies…..

    Report Post »  
  • edie1945
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:54pm

    The people of Mass do think right?????????

    Report Post »  
    • Komponist-ZAH
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:43pm

      “When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental — men whose whole thinking is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack or be lost… All the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.”
      —H.L Mencken

      Report Post »  
  • mcorbin
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:54pm

    Is it just me, or are other people sick of being taken for complete idiots by these elitists?

    Report Post »  
    • barber2
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:01pm

      Agree. Also sick of of all the anti-rich hate speech. Since when did it become a sin to work hard and to prosper ? Answer: When Barry/ Barack Soetoro / Obama was elected ! On that day America really “ changed” ….

      Report Post »  
    • Rowgue
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:01pm

      The real problem is, most people are complete idiots. It’s the only explanation for how the incompetent fools from both parties keep getting elected.

      Report Post »  
  • PJL
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:52pm

    I bet she gave it all to charity….Right?

    Report Post » PJL  
  • MJR
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:51pm

    No, she would hide her stocks, typical lying commie.

    Report Post »  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:30pm

      Maybe Lizzie Warren hid her stocks on John Catsup Kerrys YACHT?????

      Report Post »  
    • barber2
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:17pm

      Maybe she hid them with Obama’s school records. ( Seems as though no one will ever see those.) …Amazing.

      Report Post »  
  • vtxphantom
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:50pm

    And the truly poor people are really not poor, they are just material minimalists.

    Report Post »  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:49pm

    Yeah, Liz–now you may fool yourself but gee whiz, then there’s reality.

    Report Post »  
  • Stoic one
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:46pm

    NOT wealthy????
    Are people is that state so very gullible?

    Report Post » Stoic one  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:51pm

      LOL .. she wants to be part of the “99” … give it all away .. another liberal hypocrite!

      OMG 2012

      Report Post »  
    • Welcome Black Carter
      Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:13pm

      Michael Moore must have crafted her speach for her.

      Report Post » Welcome Black Carter  
  • drago
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:42pm

    “I”m not rich, i swear”, trying to save her sorry ass from the ows zombies, when they come, such a pathetic loser…..

    Report Post »  
  • HKS
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:42pm

    Looks like a one per center in disguise to me,

    Report Post » HKS  
  • TomFerrari
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:42pm

    “NO ! NOT ME !!! You’re supposed to hate the REST of the 1 % !!! ”

    LOL @ libs who think they can get RICHER by getting us regular people to hate rich people !
    LOL
    We don’t hate rich people, elizabeth. Only libs hate rich people, and you’re trying to get them to vote for you? LOLOL

    ” NO, NO ! Hate the OTHER rich people ! ”

    Now, if I were to parse her words, I find that she said some rich people have LOTS OF PORTFOLIOS.
    Perhaps she only has a FEW, MASSIVE portfolios. That would make her statement technically correct.

    Report Post » TomFerrari  
  • UBETHECHANGE
    Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:42pm

    This article states otherwise: http://www.boston.com/Boston/politicalintelligence/2012/01/elizabeth-warren-salary-topped-over-two-years/7WBGJxCbpYuENukiAE6N6J/index.html

    Elizabeth is a political opportunist and liar, but so are most politicians on both sides of the aisle! Do your homework on this radical marxist!

    Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 5

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love