Politics

Mitt Romney Delivers ‘Top Ten’ on Letterman: ‘Newt Gingrich? Really?’

NEW YORK (AP) — What would Mitt Romney like to say to the American people? How about: “Newt Gingrich? Really?”

That‘s one of the playful messages Romney announced to laughter Monday night on CBS’ “Late Show With David Letterman.“ The Republican presidential hopeful delivered the nightly ”Top Ten” list in khakis, shirt and a blue blazer without a tie. Letterman asked the causally dress candidate, “How’d you do on the back nine?”

While Romney took a gentle dig at Gingrich, his main rival for the GOP nomination, he poked fun at himself too. “Isn’t it time,” he asked, “for a president who looks like a 1970s game show host?”

And: “I can do a lot, but even I can’t fix the Indianapolis Colts.”

Romney’s No. 1 thing to tell Americans? “It’s a hair piece.”

Comments (127)

1 2 3
  • Tagudinian
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:14am

    Watching Mitt Romney smile even as his thugs beat up on Newt Gingrich is so pathetic and disgusting. All these negative attacks launched by Mitt’s well funded campaign against one man – Newt Gingrich will backfire on him big time. American people do not like bullies specially the wealthy kind like Mitt Romney. Furthermore Mitt’s clowning around with this liberal bastard Letterman will not endear him with serious voters. Mitt Romney may know a thing or two about running corporations and companies but he doesn’t know much about anything else. We need a president who can articulate to the world American exceptionalism. We need a leader in the White House not a community organizer, liar, teleprompter reader, vacationer and apologist. Newt Gingrich is our man. Newt for POTUS 2012.

    Report Post » Tagudinian  
    • Top_Down
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:20am

      Funny I don‘t hear you complain about Ron Paul’s thugs/ads and Glenn Beck, and others coming out and telling the truth about Gingrich. The problem here is they are telling the truth about Gingrich and he can’t handle it. This is exactly what Obama would be doing, actually worse. How would Gingrich hold up against Obama when the $1 billion worth of attack ads come out against him, with more info than the GOP will let out. There are worse things in his background, do you remember when he was speaker, there are worse things.

      Also Romney hasn’t attacked Gingrich as much as the media likes to point it out. Paul and Bachmann are the worse attackers on Gingrich. And no Romney did not call Gingrich ‘Zany’ as I posted below, here are the videos from the interview proving that: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/dec/romney_gingrich_zany.html

       
    • DisarmoniaMundi
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:26am

      It’s so lulzy, especially after what he said in ‘07 about McCain being the establishment ’next-in-line’ candidate. Then when he said “repeal the bad, keep the good” in an interview about Obamacare, I chuckled….seriously? Does anyone REALLY think he’s going to repeal Obamacare?

      Because I have my doubts, I’m aware of his new found respect for the 10th amendment…
      and I still have my doubts.

      Only reason I don’t feel that Gingrich is the same as Romney, is because he doesn’t have handlers. Think about that for a moment. Either he is the most skilled sociopath in history, or he’s genuine.
      He certainly isn’t a result of “big GOP machinery”, I see the entire GOP lined up against him on ALL SIDES.( From Mark Steyn to the Sunday GOP pundits. )

      Otherwise, without the benefit of the doubt..Gingrich has his ups and downs, meanwhile the only solid UP I can think of regarding Romney is economy, nothing else. That’s just my opinion, though.
      I honestly don’t think Romney can beat Obama, he couldn’t beat McCain..and that’s sad.

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:36am

      Right On Tagu and Desi! Newt 2012. Give me West, Rubio perhaps Ryan as the Veep, unbeatable! Maybe we can talk Rand Paul onto the ticket to keep the Paulistinians from going third party and re-electing Obama.

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • Joey8
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:57am

      If Newt gets the ticket, I’m voting 3rd party. I’d rather have Obama the open socialist than Newt the wolf in sheeps clothing

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:01am

      If you see no difference between Newt and Obama, you need to loosen your headband!

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • Sagat
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:19am

      Sure, we should elect Newt Gingrich to the Presidency. It’s just what America needs. What better representation of America’s decline do we need than Gingrich, a frumpy, power hungry progressive and serial adulterer? His wife would be the country’s First Mistress. This is the same mistress that Gingrich was caught having sex with on the desk in his Congressional office. How could a man that was run out of Congress in shame for ethics violations be wrong for our country? And just think about how much money Gingrich will make from his inside dealings after he’s done with the office of President. He‘ll be able to afford all the best diamonds from Tiffany’s for his current wife/mistress and even for the new mistress that he‘s bound to acquire while he’s President. Ah yes, throw your support behind the Gingrich people. It may not be best for America, but it will be a boon for Gingrich.

      Report Post » Sagat  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:50am

      - As the economy gets worse
      - People are poorer, therefore
      - Because of our government programs, they become dependent on government programs
      - Entitlement and welfare rolls grow
      - We spend more money as a result
      - Even though the economy is worse, and the government does not have the money for these programs
      - Therefore the government prints and borrows more
      - Which makes the economy worse still
      - And the cycle repeats.

      What part of that don’t the candidates understand?
      (points taken from Ron Paul)

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:07pm

      Ann Coulter: I Would Prefer Ron Paul Over Newt Gingrich

      http://www.ology.com/politics/ann-coulter-i-would-prefer-ron-paul-over-newt-gingrich/12202011

      So would I!

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:21pm

      Vechorik, Reading your listed comment, I had this disturbing mental image; arms akimbo, eyebrows askew, a skeletal head rattling in a baggy collar with a squeaky dog toy voice saying “why shouldn’t Iran have nukes, every country has the right to own them”. Jeeesh, NEXT!

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • Clara88
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:35pm

      Gov Rick Perry for Commander In Chief
      http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2011/12/19/rick-perry-for-commander-in-chief/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • PJL
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:40pm

      Your calling Mitt a Bully? Wow, Compared to Newt, who cuts people of at the knees! Please.

      Report Post » PJL  
    • Clara88
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:48pm

      I Will Vote For Gov Rick Perry In S.C.

      http://www.redstate.com/coachfess/2011/12/15/i-will-vote-for-governor-rick-perry-in-sc/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:15pm

      Ron Paul is a 9/11 Truther and said that the Bush Administration was full of GLEE after 9/11
      SHAME ON HIM!!
      http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2011/12/20/yes-virginia-ron-paul-is-a-911-truther-and-a-coddler-of-racists/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • symphonic
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:40pm

      Aw fact is you never would have voted for Mitt in your lifetime. You are voting for the geek Gingrinch and he voted for global warming and sat on the couch with Nancy Pelosi, so you deal with that first.

      Report Post » symphonic  
    • nealb4zodd
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:16pm

      I think you and you Newters are pathetic. – -Newts damaged goods. .he’s tainted. . his hands are filthy with firty franny-freddie money. – -his immigration idea to allow people who’ve been in the country . .as he puts it .. “if they belong to a church” – -huh?? that’s so stupid. – - Here’s an idea. . if they are 60 years old . .been in the country for 40 years . .ILLEGALLY . .thats their fault. – - they need to go back . .file paperwork that proves they have lived here and have been good people. . and when they come through again, their paperwork will get looked at and approved . .then they can take the citizenship oath IN ENGLISH.

      Report Post » nealb4zodd  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:51pm

      Clara, are you going to just cut and past that post on every article? Remember that the symbol 88 is a Nazi symbol for HH or Heil Hitler.

      Looks like Letterman likes Romney, that should give Romney supporters a sign.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:57pm

      Clara, I posted this on another story where you gave this link you cut and paste person you. Paul is not a truther, he is talking about a possibility that the gov is covering up inept FBI agents that had intel on terrorists that were part of the 9/11 attacks wanting to learn how to fly but not concerned about learning how to land. He says you cannot always trust government investigations, which I agree with. You are just a Progressive on here trying to spread lies.

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • political junky
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:35pm

      I hope to God you’re right! It’s disgusting to me that some could get ahead by the disgraceful methods this guy and others have used to gain the White House.

      Report Post » political junky  
  • lukerw
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:04am

    Why… do Candidates… like to act as Court Jesters… for the Liberal King of Clowns?

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • CS Lewis FAN
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:00am

    funny

    Report Post » CS Lewis FAN  
  • Ron
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:58am

    I get the distaste for this kind of pandering, but this is what democracy looks like! When primaries are open they become a lot like a general and it’s largely about the independent voters who, by the way, watch Letterman. Hasn’t everyone been saying MItt needs to be more “human” anyway?

    Report Post » Ron  
  • Thatsitivehadenough
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:50am

    I must be the only person in the world who thinks candidates & politicians shouldn’t go on these t.v. shows.

    Report Post » Thatsitivehadenough  
    • DisarmoniaMundi
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:28am

      No, I agree 100%. It’s absurd and a waste of time.

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:41am

      It’s pathetic. When politicians try to be cool, they look really lame. Remember ol’ Joe lieberman wearing jeans? He acted like he was naked.

      Report Post » Ookspay  
  • Steelman2
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:43am

    Who takes letterman seriously or even watches letterman, anyway? The liberal lemmings that do,
    are getting the same thing he does to his interns.

    Report Post » Steelman2  
  • Rodster
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:40am

    Bill Clinton started this BS, playing his Sax on light night TV. This is what’s so wrong with politics and journalism. It’s all a show, it‘s all entertainment and it’s all about reality TV. It’s not about saving this country, it’s about being the most powerful person on the planet. The news media is the same. It‘s not news it’s entertainment. The only time it’s 95% news is when a disaster strikes. I love it how we get played from all sides.

    I‘m enjoying Tim Scott’s book “A Case For A New America”.

    Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:55am

      I’m enjoying my autographed copy of “Meltdown” by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

      Report Post »  
    • dakotachuck
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:06pm

      Richard Nixon appeared on Rowan & Martin‘s Laugh In several weeks prior to the ’68 election.

      Report Post »  
  • Cape_Lookout_RW_Extremist
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:39am

    Since the RNC didn’t get the message with McCain as the nominee, we’ll see if they do when half the conservatives writes in a name on the ballot.

    Report Post » Cape_Lookout_RW_Extremist  
    • Todd P
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 3:29pm

      If that happens, BHO is re-elected.

      Report Post »  
  • Byzantine_Catholic
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:20am

    So how is the Republican Foreign Policy workin’ for ya?

    –>total for wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan is at least $3.2-4trillion (Brown university)
    –>potential nearly $1 trillion in extra spending to care for veterans returning from combat through 2050 (included in 3.2T)
    –>An unfunded WAR that our kids and Grandchildren will be paying for with interest (included in 3.2T)
    –>nearly 4500 American soldiers dead (Iraq)
    –>nearly 32,000 American soldiers wounded many of them amputees (Iraq)
    –>Christians now persecuted in Iraq (USCIRF report states that the Iraqi christian population is down 50% from 2003 levels )
    –> Republican insistence of the nonexistent WMD in Iraq caused lack of faith in Gov and republican losses in 06 and to a less degree in 08

    Its time to Stop the Republican (and Democratic) WAR Machine

    VOTE RON PAUL

    Report Post » Byzantine_Catholic  
    • Zetareticuli
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:22am

      I’m sure the world would be a better place right now if Saddam Hussein were still in power. Perhaps you should ask the Iraqis if they’d like to go back to the way things were? How about the Kuwaitis?

      Report Post »  
    • Top_Down
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:43am

      The world is doing better than it would be under a Ron Paul administration. If the US wasn’t a force in the world, and I am not saying the police force in the world, just the presence, it would probably be a scarier place and the terrorists would be bringing it to the United States more than fighting in foreign lands like we have forced them to do.

      We would be in trouble and so would everyone in the middle of thousands of more Nukes, since we are the ones who have stopped so many countries from building them. Remember that many countries dropped their nuke plans after Saddam fell. Including Libya.

      Report Post »  
    • thewatcher93
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:04am

      It is actually ironic that your name says Byzantine_Catholic, and your a Ron Paul supporter. If that is the standard for republican foreign policy than it looks alot like a democrate foreign policy, and btw Ron Paul is a republican.

      Report Post »  
    • Sol Invictus
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:09am

      Byzantine Catholic? Intentional oxymoron?

      Report Post » Sol Invictus  
    • Sol Invictus
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:13am

      Sorry, I should explain, the Byzantine Emperor was head of the Greek Orthodox Church and a bitter rival of the Catholic Papacy in Rome. I know, I really should get out more.

      Report Post » Sol Invictus  
    • Ballot_Box_Revolution
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:16am

      I am a Ron Paul fan, and so far he has my vote, and I don’t see much changing my view. That being said you can’t call the situation we are in right now, at this very moment Republican foreign policy.

      I can’t stand McCain but I think if he were elected the situation would be a little different in that area. We would have been in it to win it. He would have most likely beefed up the size of government just like Obama…..They are the same, they just want it in different ways…

      Report Post » Ballot_Box_Revolution  
    • GilbertAcct
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:34am

      Google “Robert Pape” and watch him discuss his study of suicide terrorism (a study funded in part by the US Dept. of Defense). He explains that 95% of suicide terrorism is a result of occupation.

      On another note concerning Iran… here is a recent quote from a report by the US Dept. of Defense: “At present Iran‘s forces are sufficent to deter or defend against conventional threats from Iran’s weaker neighbors such as post-war Iraq, the GCC, Azerbaijan or Afghanistan but lack the air power and logistical ability to power much beyond Iran’s boarders or to confront regional powers such as Turkey or Israel.”

      In other words, Ron Paul’s statements on Iran agree with our own intelligence. It is the media and the big military politicians who are hyping the Iran threat… Just like they hyped the Iraq threat. It’s ironic that so many people who disagree with the war in Iraq and are disappointed that we went in based on false intelligence are the same people who say Ron Paul is crazy for giving the same warnings on Iran.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:59am

      I’m a Christian Catholic that supports Ron Paul. What has that got to do with anything?
      I know Ron Paul’s platform very well.
      It amazes me to see the GOP trash their own candidate with lies and fear-mongering.
      The war-machine has a very tight grip on the GOP and they don’t plan on losing it.
      I plan to give them a run for their money by voting Ron Paul.

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:30pm

      Vechorik actually said “It amazes me to see the GOP trash their own candidate”. Uh Vechorik, the good Dr. Paul is spending 10 MILLION DOLLARS, trashing Newt. And you are here on the Blaze all day, every day, basically trashing every republican except that sweet little man, Ron Paul.

      Ron Paul actually went on Leno and said that Michelle Bachmann “Hates Muslims”, “She wants to kill Muslims”. The guy is a frickin’ CRACKPOT!

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:54pm

      Because Bachmann LIED — how many “fact checks” do you have to see?!!?

      Report Post »  
    • CptStubbing
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:57pm

      Bachmann wanted to kill Awlaki who was a Muslim. She seems to wants to kill Ahmadinejad who is a Muslim. She also supports Obama’s continual use of drone attacks into a sovereign nation full of Muslims. Drone attacks that kill a lot more people than just suspected terrorists. She certainly wants to attack Iran a country full of Muslims, as well as Jews and Christians. She said she doesn’t “hate Muslims” but in the same breath she turns around and says that Iranians hate Jews. Never mind that 25,000 Jews live in Iran and freely worship in their own synagogues. So it’s okay for her to blanket an entire people with a statement of hate, but Ron Paul who only ever sees Bachman talking negatively about Muslims, or Santorum who feels it is necessary to racially profile people even though Islam is a religion made of people from all different cultures. How would one come to any other conclusion than these two seem to “strongly dislike” Muslims?

      Report Post »  
    • Ookspay
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:38pm

      Cpt Stubbing and Vechorik, Over simplification and gross generalizations are the hallmarks of Libertarians. This flaw is evident in both of you pos(t)ers! It is also the reason Ron Paul is not taken seriously, except by fringe simpletons.

      Using your logic regarding RP’s comments about Bachmann hating muslims, I will use a simple example: Last winter there were coyotes attacking and killing my chickens. So, I shot a few of those murderous dogs. Does this mean that I hate all dogs? Just ask my Yorkie Cody, my Blonde Lab Kapena, my Mixed Labs Charcoal and Wilson, I love dogs just fine.

      Report Post » Ookspay  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:37pm

      I don’t consider TRUTH and spreading FACTS “trashing”
      It’s more like EDUCATION.

      Report Post »  
    • c0mm0nsense
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 3:37pm

      Bachmann only hate Muslims and lies when she thinks she can pick up a few votes. “ABC News Michele Bachmann Says She‘s ’Not A Politician,’ ” She is done, only grasping at straws, she doesn’t even have enough money to leave Iowa. Where is her staff in NH ? Oh she does not have a staff in NH
      .

      Report Post » c0mm0nsense  
  • Blazen420
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:15am

    Romney talks the same crap that Obama did. They are the same.

    Report Post »  
  • mikenleeds
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:47am

    Screw you mitt… your no different than what we have in the white house now

    Report Post » mikenleeds  
    • Zetareticuli
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:20am

      When did Obama turn around multiple companies? When did he save the bankrupt Olympics? Obama has only shown a penchant for spending and waste. Romney has all the makings of an economic genius. I’ll take the guy with the proven track record thank you very much. To say they are the same thing is idiotic.

      Report Post »  
  • AmericanWomanFirst
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:35am

    When will they get it? We don’t need an entertainer, nor a comedian, or a rockstar. We need a LEADER! The country is going down the tubes and the world is on fire, but hey our so called wannabe leaders have time for crap like this. Keep it up you wannabees and you’ll end up with a 3rd party…American‘s don’t find you “funny”.

    Report Post » AmericanWomanFirst  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:59am

      I am with you…… I want George Patton and so far we’ve had Curly, Larry & Paul

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Zetareticuli
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:17am

      Politicians do this kind of thing in order to show people they have a sense of humor. I‘m sure Romney was advised to do it because everyone says he’s too stiff and robotic. They call him inhuman and too serious when he’s all business and another group criticizes him if he tries to appear more casual and light-hearted. It’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation. Personally, I think this kind of thing can help a candidate. I know that when Al Gore did it and made the joke, “Remember America, I gave you the Internet and I can take it away.” it was hilarious. I had more respect for him when he showed he could be self-deprecating.

      Report Post »  
    • Speaking_my_mind
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:40am

      Yes I agree! This country is on the verge of imploding and those clowns are on TV having fun.
      What a joke!

      Report Post »  
    • Speaking_my_mind
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:42am

      We need someone who ACTS like a president not who LOOKS like one…

      Report Post »  
  • whereareyourbrains
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:30am

    Has everyone forgotten that when Obummer complained about the money spent by Bush was excessive and he was a bad president for doing this? This president has double the amount of money spent by all presidents combined and not one candidate is bringing that up. We have been downgraded because of his spending. Romney is going to be the rich boy spending our money again.
    The gang up on Newt is telling me something. Wait till they ruin Newt, Romney will be next and no one will be left. Great tactics from the left and the Rebuplicans. They are shooting themselves in the foot.

    Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
    • smackdown33
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:53am

      I will not vote for Romney. And, I did not vote for Dole. Had McCain not had Palin, I would not have voted for him either… hoping for a William Henry Harrison moment.

      Report Post »  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:12am

    Why Republicans feel the need to appear on TV shows that mock and despise them is a mystery to me.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • smackdown33
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:24am

      It’s all about them. Altruism is a rare find in a politician, a very rare find indeed. They view themselves as would any entertainment figure reflecting upon themselves. Same arrogance and same expected privilege.

      Report Post »  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:38am

      I don’t think we will be seeing the likes of Marco Rubio doing the late night circuit.

      Report Post » biohazard23  
    • circleDwagons
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:12am

      we need a leader not a clown

      Report Post » circleDwagons  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:55am

      Romney thought he would fit right in with Letterrman’s Democratic audience. That’s why.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:01am

      biohazard23
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:38am

      I don’t think we will be seeing the likes of Marco Rubio doing the late night circuit.
      ——————————–
      We see West/Rubio voting for the antiPatriot act that led to the “indefinite detention” bill.
      That’s much worse than a late night show.
      They don’t support the Constitution.
      They promote fear as an excuse to trade freedom for “safety.”
      If we lose freedom — we’ve lost everything — we’ve lost America.

      Report Post »  
    • ILUVJESUS
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:47am

      Yes, I feel the same.

      Report Post » ILUVJESUS  
  • conservativeBC
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:11am

    Gingrich won’t be happy with that

    Report Post » conservativeBC  
  • conservativeBC
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:10am

    Rush hit him pretty hard too…

    Rush Limbaugh TKOs Gingrich For His Global Warming Book

    http://thebachmanncometh.blogspot.com/2011/12/rush-limbaugh-tkos-gingrich-for-his.html

    Report Post » conservativeBC  
    • whereareyourbrains
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:34am

      So what. A book on global warming…geeeze…..75% of the public has fallen for the global warming gimmick. That won’t keep me from wanting Newt as president. He won’t follow all the rules made by Washington. He will straighten out AMerica. Some will be unhappy and some will be glad. He will not ruin our credit rating and he will respect the citizens of USA

      Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:56am

      This is one thing that keeps me voting for Gingrich:
      2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
      http://www.gunowners.org

      Ron Paul A+
      Rick Perry A
      Michelle Bachmann A
      Rick Santorum B-
      Newt Gingrich C
      Mitt Romney D-

      Report Post »  
  • YepImaConservative
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:48am

    I think Letterman ‘ought to have Ron Paul on his to do a TOP TEN take’off from Paul’s “Racist Newsletters”, now THAT would be hilarious! Or not… depending on how you look at it. His supporters would find it hilarious and would definately agree with it’s content. The rest of America would probably be in the “Or not…” category and boo him just like he’s been booed on many other occasions on the national stage.

    Ron Paul could end it with… Me, Lew Rockwell, The Von Mises Inst., Murray Rothbard (now dead, but alive in the hearts of racists) Neo-Nazi’s, Stromfront, David Duke, Timothy McVeigh admiring militia grps., Truthers, Birthers, Conspiracy Theorists, Democrats, Leftists, Code-Pink- our anti-war, anti-military friends, Ron Paul Forums, my tin-foil hat and the racist newsletters would like you to support us for President…. “FREE BANANA’S” (Bad Lip Reading video quote, lol) Thank You!!

    Report Post » YepImaConservative  
  • Drakkhanlord
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:40am

    Conflict with iran incoming…
    judge rules iran connected to 9/11…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Fw5v-kkIix8

    Report Post » Drakkhanlord  
  • GadsdenGurl
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:39am

    Ron Paul is going to win Iowa anyway

    Report Post » GadsdenGurl  
    • JLGunner
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:28am

      aaaannnndddd? He’s still a kook.

      Report Post » JLGunner  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:29am

      Yes, they said Newt and Romney were tied for first? Do they not read polls?

      Return to the Constitution to stop the BS!
      Ron Paul 2012

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • GadsdenGurl
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:18am

      And in typical fashion you have nothing to substantiate that ad hominem attack.

      I like a kook who realizes that if we’re to fend off communism and global government it must be done from WITHIN.

      He is pro life
      He will CUT spending
      He will curb or cut departments like EDU which have no biz meddling in local issues
      He will get us out of the UN and not sign any treaties like Newt would
      He will secure the borders
      He will strengthen the militiary
      He will rein in the FED!

      I say PROGRESSIVE republicans are doing more damage than liberals.. and BECK agrees.

      Report Post » GadsdenGurl  
    • spankadonkey
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:58am

      GADS – Although Paul is a joke and you Paulbutz just can’t see it, in a small way, I hope he wins Iowa for two reasons. 1) It will show how irrelevant Iowa is, and 2) It will bring real scrutiny to Paul and he will finally crash and burn and be no more than a funny footnote in history.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:02pm

      The reason Ron Paul wins Iowa is that the campaign has educated a lot of people there. The rest of America hasn’t caught up yet — haven’t done their homework.

      Report Post »  
  • asybot12
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:32am

    Santorum/ Bachmann

    Report Post »  
  • asybot12
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:31am

    There is to me just one comment he made on the dec 19 interview on O”Rielly.
    Very early on he said he made a mistake about abortion. He said he made the mistake saying that laws change over time . Sadly enough I feel he would do the same thing to the Constitution. . This to is WAY to close what Obama has said and most if not all progressives!

    Report Post »  
    • spiritsmonger
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:54am

      I’m not a Mittens supporter, but I have to defend him on this one. I used to be pro choice in my younger days. I’m 40 now, with 2 kids and my views are radically different. People can change their mind. I know politics is dirty, but even on the best days in the best places, all you can do is take a man at his word. I’m a Ron Paul guy, but I believe Mittens on this one.

      Report Post »  
    • Zetareticuli
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:15am

      Way to take his comments out of context. He said that he has always been pro-life, but previously ran under the philosophy that he wouldn’t try and change the system. He said that was a naive position because he was faced with legislation which was trying to define when life began for the purposes of abortion. He was basically saying he tried to separate himself from the issue, but couldn‘t because it’s still an evolving issue with new laws being proposed. It can’t be ignored.

      Report Post »  
  • searching for the Truth
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:09am

    It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to run the country – but it does take one willing to go against the status quo and have fear of the Lord.

    Report Post »  
  • Damn the Taxes - Full Speed Ahead
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 5:22am

    With the political divisiveness as far apart as it currently is. And with the current crop of GOP presidential wannabes campaigning all over and with debate after debate, it is becoming more and more difficult to determine if they are in a sketch comedy show or in real life. It seems that the candidates real life campaigns are so satirical by itself that an improv group is not needed. It is funny enough on its own! I think that one of the TV networks ought to pick up this GOPTP presidential debate for a couple of new seasons. It has become one of the best TV reality-based sitcoms in TV history!!!! They, the GOPTP candidates, keep me laughing and keep me wanting more – two primary tenets of a successful TV show!!

    Report Post »  
    • whereareyourbrains
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 7:44am

      Yep NBC and CBS asked questions to make them argue with one another. Good for rating? Good for Obama. The networks are working for Obama and Soros…get it. You forget about the Democrat line ups for election. Al Gore was the best, the cheating on his wife that had cancer..what WAS his name? Clinton who had sex with an intern right in the WH and now Newt is the bad one? REALLY.
      I want the man or woman who is not in the pocket of the GOP party, but I want a GOP to win. Guess that leaves NEWT……

      Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:00pm

      You want someone who’s “not in the pocket” and choose Newt? Heck — Newt is in YOUR pocket — taking all he can!

      Selling access, Newt Gingrich:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRdqGKA782A

      Report Post »  
  • Robert999
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 5:21am

    Don’t forget how this Commie Letterman treated Gov. Palin and her daughter smearing them with the kind of immoral behavior he is guilty of. I guess now we know for sure what Romney is. Birds of a feather flock together.

    Report Post »  
    • chicago76
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:01am

      Amen brother. Romney is the establishment choice. The Wallstreet choice, like Obama was and is. They are paying both sides this time. With Romney we will get a continuation of Obama and Bush policies, no doubt in my mind. Wallstreet is antiAmerican.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:58pm

      Fox News said from the beginning “it’s Romney” and they‘re doing their best to make sure that’s true.

      Report Post »  
  • MonkeyBeagle
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 4:16am

    That was ok, still not a Romney fan, but he is better then Newt… maybe. If you want a good laugh you can watch this new christmas song. Tis the season to offend others http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3OP9RAA0Pc by saying Merry Christmas.

    Report Post »  
    • ConservativeCharlie
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 5:16am

      I agree monkeyb If I had to choose between Mitt and Newt it would be a coin toss. Thankfully we still have a few conservatives left in the race and we dont have to make that choice yet. Mitt Romney was much better then Perry on the tonight show. Thanks for the link to Monkey, I thought the video on the link was funny.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love