Teen Mom Calls 9-1-1 for Permission to Shoot Intruders Before Killing One Using 12-Gauge Shotgun
- Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:09pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »

Eighteen-year-old Sarah McKinley and her 3-month-old son were unharmed when two intruders tried to break into their home outside of Oklahoma City on New Year’s Eve. Her husband had died from lung cancer on Christmas Day, and when she realized intruders were attempting to break into her home she had nothing to do but grab her 12-gauge shotgun and pistol, and call 911.
She spoke with the operator for 21 minutes, making sure she had the right to shoot if the men forced their way in.
“I can’t tell you that you can do that, but you do what you have to do to protect your baby,” the dispatcher told her as she held the infant with a bottle, according to KOCO.
She ultimately pulled the trigger.
One of the men, 24-year-old Justin Martin, McKinley is believed to have been stalking her since her husband’s death. ABC news reports that McKinley barricaded herself in her bedroom with the baby and guns. When Martin kicked down the bedroom door, McKinley’s maternal instincts kicked in:
“When Martin kicked in the door and came after her with the knife, the teen mom shot and killed the 24-year-old. Police are calling the shooting justified.
‘You’re allowed to shoot an unauthorized person that is in your home. The law provides you the remedy, and sanctions the use of deadly force; Det. Dan Huff of the Blanchard police said.”
Martin died and the second suspect, Dustin Stewart, currently sits in jail. Investigators are searching Martin’s car for evidence that the home invasion was premeditated, KFOR-TV reported.
“I wouldn’t have done it, but it was my son,” McKinley told KOCO. “It’s not an easy decision to make, but it was either going to be him or my son. And it wasn’t going to be my son. There’s nothing more dangerous than a woman with a child.”
Amen.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (779)
ModerationIsBest
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:35pmSad someone had to die but I’m glad the woman was able to keep her and her baby safe.
Report Post »Lynn256
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:43pmGood for her, Hard telling what they would have done to her..reap what you sow..
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:43pmNot sad at all. This woman and her baby are safe and that is reason for everyone to be happy. As to the “stalker” he got exactly what he worked hard to earn.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:48pmAs the last word says..amen.
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:56pmWhat‘s sad is that you have to ask permssion to shoot someone who’s trying to kill you. 21 minutes before help arrived! And the left want to take our guns away! God help us all.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:59pmMOERATIONISBEST, I agree. I am thankful she had a gun and knew how to use it.
Report Post »rickgy53
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:00pmi guess my questions is, where does she live that the police couldnt get to her within 21 minutes.
Report Post »that seems like an awful long time to talk to a 911 operator.
Slayer
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:12pmNot sad that someone died in this case. Too bad the second intruder isn’t dead too.
Report Post »letsdoit
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:13pmNo, “ its not sad someone had to die”. We need more people like her to thin the heard.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:14pm“She spoke with the operator for 21 minutes, making sure she had the right to shoot if the men forced their way in.”
That is the best reason for firearm self defense there is, right there! 21mins???
Whats the old saying, When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
Report Post »Thats alot of minutes!!
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:14pm.
Report Post »When the W.H. finds out the dead guy voted for Obama, Holder will be on the first plane to OKC……
Jim Ed
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:15pmI actually grew up about 20 miles from Blanchard and I guess my question would be if she talked to the dispatcher for 21 minutes where the hell were the police? I mean it’s not a big deal the guy got what he deserved after all he brought a knife to a gun fight.
Report Post »letsdoit
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:16pmNo, Its not sad someone had to die. We need more people like to to help thin the heard
Report Post »mrqstixx
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:17pmNo. It’s not sad at all.
Report Post »betterthantv
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:19pmThere is nothing sad about this story! Good job mommy!
Report Post »000degrees
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:20pmHer child will one day thank mom for being responsible. Lefties could still find something wrong with that I’m sure. Not everyone has that much time to compose themselves. People should think about this scenario once and a while and put their plan together before the door gets kicked in.
ninetoesjudd
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:23pmGood point. He had to die.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:29pmThe only thing sad here is that the woman had to experience any fear or mental distress due to the actions of the vermin.
Otherwise, good outcome for all.
Report Post »gmoneytx
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:34pm“sad someone had to die”? You’re kidding, right? This guy came after her with a knife…what do you think he was going to do with the knife, make her a peanut butter sandwich? Geez!
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:35pmI understand that the president is going to award her a medal for bravery.
Report Post »BastiatsLaw
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:35pm@moderationisbest, you say it is sad someone had to die. Which is the same thing you would say if that poor woman had been killed by an intruder and did not have the capability of defending herself. Or what if she had been raped? What would you say then? Sad would not bring her back from the dead or restore her sanity after being raped.
Seriously? When someone attacks another human being with a knife and the obvious intent to harm or kill you say you are sad that they are dead? I’m thankful that she was armed and capable of defending herself.
What saddens me is that our culture creates predators like the decedent and bleeding hearts that are sad when he is killed for attacking an innocent women in her own house. Would you prefer she tried to talk it over with the guy as he was coming at her with a knife? Wake-up man!
Report Post »suffolkva
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:36pmNo, it’s not sad! The stupid b******d deserved what he got. Maybe the next guy that decides to invade a private dwelling will think twice!
Report Post »chfields62
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:53pmYou go girl!! Armed law abiding citizen 1 low life 0. 1 less low life the taxpayers have to support.
More proof as to why we have the 2nd amendment…………..and need to protect it…
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:58pmI live out in the stickes here in Oklahoma and it is about 25 minuets to drive in town. If my wife had to dial 911 she would get the volunteer fire dept. They would calll sherrifs dept and probably get there first. All the fire trucks have a 30-06 rifle in the cab and most of the guys have carry permits and are packing. While all this was going on my wife would have either got my Winchester 30-30 or got her Taurus 4510 Judge loaded with .410 gauge shells. All 3 of my daughter inlaws have carry permits and have a .357 that is loaded and ready to go.
Report Post »Bowlz
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:01pmGood for her. She did what any person or parent should have done. Those guys declared war when they tried to break into her house and they lost.
Report Post »Porkchop_sw
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:01pmOne less deadbeat jerk terrorizing women and children! Good for her.
Report Post »getalong
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:04pmEvery American has the right to defend themselves in the privacy of their own home. She did what she had to do. I am sure that it is not easy for her to have had to kill the young man. My prayers go out to her. Good job defending your baby and yourself!
Report Post »fertlmind
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:08pmJustice done,….Guy got what he deserved,….the dead guy is not a victim,…
Report Post »But if her late husband didn’t have a gun around for protection there would have been 2,…
21 MINUTES?…….Where the hell were the police?
Not a very good response time, but it’s what most of us can expect depending on where you live.
They must have been busy with MORE IMPORTANT CRY’S FOR HELP!!!!!!!!!!!
Just goes to prove that nobody can protect your family better than you!
Poor lady,…she has had a rough time of it.
I hope the anti gun crowd will leave her alone now,…but I doubt it.
Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:10pmWe need more store owners, whom are robbed by gunpoint, to do the same thing. That is how you decrease theft and robberies. If the criminals think that they would be shot and killed for B&E’s, chances are theyll reconsider committing the crime in the first place. “When seconds count, the Police are minutes away.”
A Sad loss for this deceased individuals family, but it was that persons decision to commit to a B&E.
A short lesson: Actions have reactions.
Report Post »johnannegalt
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:17pmAs an ex-911 calltaker/dispatcher in central Texas, I can tell you the calltaker/operator was correct.
Report Post »I once had an elderly woman who lived alone call, saying someone was trying to come in by breaking down the front door. She was also armed with a 12 gauge shot gun. She lived in the country, and was concerned that the officers might not get there before the assailant busted down the door. They didn’t. She yelled “I’m gonna shoot him!” and BAM.. she did. The officers from my understanding were impressed with her ability to handle a weapon when panicked as well as she did.
GBTVFan_Non_American_Overseas
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:41pmWhat bothers me the most is the fact that the intruder was stalking her since her husband died!!!….looking for a weak victim with a three months baby!!!…….This brave girl is a teenager, is grieving her very recently died husband, and is alone with her little baby…and this SOB was looking at her as a prey and stalking the house for more than a week…..Instant justice from heaven is what he got!!!
Report Post »jado1981
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:42pmConsider the guy dying a little bit of Bleach being added to the gene pool. Hopefully she got to him before he had a chance to procreate.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:46pmThe STUPID dispathcher said…”I can;t tell you it’s OK to shooy him, just do what you have to do”….God help us if we have police dispatchers that stupid!
Report Post »CanteenBoy
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:48pmNot “someone”. A giant P.O.S. died they way he deserved to.
Report Post »HoggKilla
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:48pmGlad to see the intruder died. Not sure of the laws there, but hopefully the other guy gets charged with his buddys murder. There is no more room for these animals. Kill’em. If the law permits.
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:49pmThur ya go! It is a complete falsehood that a rape victim is somehow morally superior to a unharmed woman with a shotgun.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:50pmMore People Now Own Heat For Protection
Criminals better start paying attention. Too bad the other intruder was not wasted. Now that Mother faces a big law suit after the other intruder gets to talk to a lawyer.
Report Post »BRONKO
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:51pmWhat is sad is your moronic thought that booohooo someone had to die!!!!
Report Post »the peice of garbage had a knife was prepared to use it…and you think it was too bad he had too die???????WHAT IS TOO BAD IS HE WAS NOT BREAKING INTO YOUR HOME SO YOU COULD HAVE WELCOMED HIM BY GIVING HIM YOUR WIFE OR CHILD…..AND WATCHING WHAT HE WANTED TO DO TO THEM!! YOUR SUCH A GOOD PERSON…
Rowgue
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:53pm@RICKYGY53
A twenty one minute response time is actually pretty typical. The guidlines that they work under say that only incidents with people actually dead or dying are emergency situations that require immediate response. Situations like this are categorized as non-emergency situations.
It‘s sad but it’s the result of the fact that the vast majority of calls to 911 are not emergencies, and they incorrectly work under that assumption.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:55pmNothing sad about a perp doing B&E and advancing with a weapon getting his just desserts. Nothing sad at all about it. Worth cheering over, in fact.
Report Post »Rejoice the mother and child are well- and especially that since the father just died and the family is left without a bread winner. That’s what there is to be sad about in this story.
Wolf
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:58pm@Ricky- 21 minutes isn’t so long a time- I‘m 21 minutes from the nearest town and it’s at least 30 before anyone would show up at my door.
Report Post »quicker
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:18pmWhat is also sad is the young lady has to live with this the rest of her life.It is never easy taking a life,but it is better to do what she did as the alturnative was worst.I just hope that she comes out alright.God bless her and her child.And I hope that after her pain of losing her husband is over she finds a good man to share in her life.
Report Post »greenherring
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:21pmGreat response bible quotin asshat……
HumbleMan
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:32pmThank god she was armed and knew what to do.
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:33pmIt’s not sad. It’s the result of a poor exercise in free will. The dead idiot made a poor decision that put two human beings (one fully defenseless, one not so much) in fear for their lives. Once this punk and his friend decided to invade another’s property, they (and others like them who intend to steal and do harm) have EXPRESSLY invited whatever response to stop the invasion the rightful landowner/target brings to bear. I’ve told my own children if they engage in such thievery, they deserve whatever bad thing comes their way. No sympathy here.
Report Post »Self defense is a basic right witnessed thoughout the animal kingdom. “Ware the UN and other bleeding hearts such as liberal national govts. that assert there is no such right BUT thugs have rights to protect them from due recourse. Such dangerous thinking usually indicates an unspoken ownership of all citizens. Don’t want those thralls gettin too bold, now do you? They might decide to challenge other thugs and thieves… like those in govt.
21 minutes on the phone debating this? To hell with that. I’m not a violent man, but that’s a < 21 second phone call telling authorities where to come so that they can remove the garbage from my property. After the interloper is down.
Waste no tears on this trash. I'm sure they and their kind wouldn't have bothered if roles were reversed. Good riddance. Some folks choose to act like wild animals… so be it.
Reconstructed leftist
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:43pmwhat the HECK is sad about one less sleazeball ruining society ?? I love the woman for shooting him and I hope she got him right in the eyeball. I hope she votes Republican too.
Report Post »ZZBlueComet
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:44pmHad we Govt. Gun Control, she’d be dead. Hey Liberals, the guy used a KNIFE and she defender herself with a GUN.
Report Post »DOXOLOGY
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:46pmHave we all replaced our heart for this young mother with ego? Are all those here who cheer for the killing of a human sharing of the same action? And take joy in it?
This girl is 18 years old with a newborn baby and a recently deceased husband. That’s difficult enough (believe me I know) and now she has to live with the memory of taking a life to possibly save a life in a moment of sheer terror. She will relive that moment her whole life, you won’t. She will always wonder what if, you won’t? Stop cheerleading for death, its insulting. Satan has enough power already.
Have you considered at all the possibility that she was on the phone asking for permission because she knows its wrong to kill? Trying desperately not to bring further violence to the situation? What if the police did show up and she let her guard down and was taken captive? What then?
WE DON’T KNOW! So forgive me for saying the obvious: we don’t get to have a say in this. It is between her and God now. Same for the dead boy and the prisoner. They made choices and we don’t get to judge. My heart goes out to this girl, one so young should not have to know of such things.
What has happened has happened and couldn’t have happened any other way. The problem is us, passing judgement where we haven’t the right.
We are not wise enough to apply the correct justice in an eye for an eye. I believe that is why God sent His son. BTW, Jesus never killed anyone…
My Two Cents
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:50pmThis is why we have the Castle Law in Texas. If and when the time comes, no US citizen should ever have to question whether or not they have the right to use deadly force in order to defend their lives and property.
Report Post »Paul -Indiana
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:55pmThis was a great outcome. Keep clinging to your guns and your religion.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:57pmWITHOUT THE SHOT GUN and her ability to use it, she and baby would be dead and law enforcement would be out looking for intruders. YOU GO GIRL. I hope SHOT GUN sales zoom this week.
NO ONE wants to shoot anyone but they were coming after her and GOD FORBID, her CHILD and they got what they deserved. Let’s pray for her that she finds PEACE and gets some normalcy back into her life after the death of her Husband…she’s has a really rough go of it.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:58pmRick Santorum is stonewalling gun owners.
He is refusing to tell gun owners in Iowa where he stands on important Second Amendment issues.
Despite repeated attempts for Rick Santorum to return his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey 100% in favor of our gun rights, he has time and time again remained silent.
Please call Rick Santorum right now and demand he return his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey — at once.
His Iowa office: 515-421-7224
Report Post »His South Carolina office: 855-206-7425
His New Hampshire office: 603-518-5199
derekcranex
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:12pmI’m not sad. He needed it.
Report Post »3hounddogs
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:13pmNo, it’s not sad. I love it when the good people win and the bad guy pays with his life.
Report Post »SWING HARD
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:23pmCull the heard
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:31pmShe did what needed to be done to protect herself and the baby.
1. She had a firearm.
2. It was not locked up, disassembled, or difficult to reach.
3. She knew how to use it.
Ladies, please consider how you might react in a similar situation. Do you know where your firearm is? Can you get at it easily? Have you ever “run a scenario” at home to see how fast you could react?
Report Post »Libertyordeath73
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:38pmI’m not losing any sleep over someone dying because of their own stupidity. If he broke in, he deserved it and I’m glad she did it. A lesson learned by the intruder, albeit a late one.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:43pm“I wouldn’t have done it, but it was my son…”
—–
Guess this is one of the few times I’m glad a girl that young is already a mother. Those filthy cowards were going to rape her, maybe torture her and definitely kill her. That’s why they had a knife.
What’s with people who feel sympathy for rapists and murderers?
Report Post »DocH
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:03pmIt takes courage to act like this mother did if we have to. If you happen to be concerned about the increase in random violence, try this: http://www.homedefenseschool.com
Report Post »FlamingFartSyndrome
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:14pmYour sad that a man who was stalking an 18 year old mother right after the death of her husband was killed while attempting to attack her and her infant with a hunting knife?
The only sad thing would have been if he lived and we were paying for his health bills, lawyers, investigators, prison, etc.
Report Post »9635kari
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:19pmWhy is it sad someone had to die? This piece of vermin should have thought about that when he entered with intention to do harm. It saved the tax payer money to house them, and I say God Bless Us Everyone!!!!
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:20pmSame thing goes for Nazis who try to arrest or detain without warrant.
Headshots, screw your vest.
Report Post »ptisme
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:28pmCan someone please explain to me why, during the 21 minutes she was on the phone with the operator, that the cops weren’t at her house?
Report Post »Grey Eagle
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:31pmI would have done the same thing without question.
Report Post »normbal
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:32pmRemember, when seconds count, the police are minutes to hours away.
God bless her.
Guns save lives.
Report Post »JayCee
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:40pmThe sad part was that her husband had just died on Christmas day.
Report Post »adoerfler
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:15pmOnly sad thing is that the young woman didn’t shoot them both. The perp is dead because he thought he had an easy victim. They were predators in search of prey – 2 men against one 18 year-old mother. If the police had arrived and shot him it would be police brutality. If he was only wounded or arrested he’d tie up the courts for months, wear a suit to court, get his mother to beg for leniency. And maybe his next choice for victim would be you.
Report Post »dholio
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:19pmThis is an amazing story with a very happy ending: The bad guy died, mom saved her and her child’s life, the only thing better would have been if the little bitty baby would have pulled out a gun and put a few rounds into that moron…
Report Post »forthepeople
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:31pmNot Sad…Happy day for US, we are tired of these ‘ perps ’ perpetrator getting any at all sympathy for these morons . He kicked two doors down and had a knife HE IS DEAD and this ‘ MODERATIONISBEST ’ thinks it sad ? They are sadly mistaken .
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:37pmAnother example of Social Justice at work. Killing sinners is required in order to improve quality of life.
Chronic corruption devalues quality of life until WE eliminate those who disobey Gods ways.
Report Post »FB247
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:38pmNot sad, She saved the tax payers over $16K per year for not having to incarcerate him.
Report Post »Favored93
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:52pmAll of us are a little bit safer because one dirt bag is off the streets and the ones still out there may think twice.
Report Post »I have a shot gun and my side arm stays with me for that very reason.
Trucker1313
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:04pmno it is not sad when a piece of garbage is taken out for good ,to bad the other one was not close enough to make it two for one
Report Post »Uranium Wedge
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:08pmAsk god to protect her from here on out.
Report Post »GeoInSD
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:13pmIt is unfortunate that someone died but I don‘t think it is sad because it was the consequence of the dead man’s CONSCIOUS CHOICE. It is sad when unfortunate things happen randomly or if that mother or child were hurt. I really don’t feel sorry for someone dying while making a conscious choice to hurt someone else.
Report Post »yiska8
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 11:08pmIt’s good to see a devoted and protective young, tough mother for a change. She’s a strong one after losing her husband. All she had was her child, and she fulfilled her main duty as a mother. Let this be a lesson to those thinking of doing the same criminal act. The most dangerous situation to be in is to go against a protective mother and her child. God Bless this young lady and her baby. .
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 11:10pmShe did the right thing. See why we must be able to protect ourselves? She could have been killed or raped in the 21 minutes had she not had a gun. Shotguns are great protection. I would not need permission from anyone, however, I would call 911 and have them stay on the line if I heard anyone trying to break in my home. I can use a gun, and would not hesitate shooting anyone breaking into my home. The person might break in, but would have to be carried out. In classes they advise you to tell the people in a loud voice that you have a gun and will shoot and the rest is up to them.
For those who are afraid of guns, take classes and learn to be responsible. Just look at how many people kill others with their cars, but they aren’t afraid of the car, so no need to be afraid of a gun.
Report Post »MetalPatriot
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 11:25pm21 minutes?!! Usually the potential victim is asleep and only has seconds to respond.
Glad he’s dead & wish the other were as well. More of this will deter crime like nothing else. Problem is, many of us are going to have to go to jail/prison for defending ourselves…at least here in Commufornia.
Report Post »conard3
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 11:44pmI’m not sad the guy died. I’m sad the lady had to shoot him. Screw him. He deserved it going into her house for over 21 minutes. She’s the one that has to deal with the emotions of killing someone (and her hubbys death). Don’t ever be sad for someone dying after they break into someones house and threaten their family.
Report Post »metalurgy
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 11:52pmDid everything right.
Grabbed the kid.
Grabbed the guns and observed the four rules of firearms safety.
Went to a safe room.
Called 911
Shot from behind cover.
Shot straight and true and destroyed intended armed target.
Sent perpetrator to suffer in eternal hell fire and demonic torment if God judges him guilty of unrepentant mortal sin.
Enforced the laws protecting her rights that the cops couldn’t.
Left the cops to clean up the messy pieces, which they are pretty much experts at these days.
Sent a message to would be criminal element in neighborhood: “You want some of this?”
Set a good example for local community on how to protect yourself within the law.
Did I miss anything?
Report Post »MetalPatriot
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 12:11amI can’t believe she actually had 21 minutes. Most intruders are in & you’re at risk within seconds…hopefully you’re not asleep to wake up groggy to make a decision…which is typically the case.
I’m actually GLAD the intruder is dead.
Still, 21 minutes
Report Post »Obamaisapileofshizzle
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 12:57amSad my ass! The son of a bitch deserved to die!!!
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 1:26amIf the UN gun control laws had been in force, she and her son probably would have been the ONES WHO WERE DEAD! AND THAT’S THE WHOLE AGENDA BEHIND FAST AND FURIOUS, TRYING TO PROVE THERE ARE TOO MANY GUNS IN AMERICA! Thank God she had those weapons and knew how to use them. God be with her and her son!
Report Post »Perhaps the death of a Border agent which brought that whole agenda public, was the one thing that gave her the legal right (they can never take away the moral or spiritual right) , still, to protect herself and her child.
Mil Mom
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 1:32am@turkey13
Report Post »Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:35pm
I understand that the president is going to award her a medal for bravery
****
And we’ll all Thank God, it’s not HIS POSTHUMUS MEDAL FOR SHOWING RESTRAINT!
proudamerican1990
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 1:42amI agree. I never want to shoot someone, but if someone threatens me, or any future children of me, I won’t have a choice.
Ms. McKinley, I am deeply sorry for the loss of your husband. It is truly tragic that your baby will grow up without a father.
Report Post »SC 11 BRAVO
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 1:44amNOT SAD AT ALL POS had to die,, YOU GO MOM!!
Report Post »TaraR42
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:26amThere are two sad parts to this story one it took over 21 minutes for help to arrive and the other is her husband passed just a few weeks ago!
Report Post »George Patton
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:57am@baddog Every time you post you reveal your ignorant youth. The dispatcher can’t tell a random stranger that it is ok to kill anyone who comes in her house. Go back to playing call of duty and leave the adults alone.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:15amThose guys werent there to do her laundry. They made a fatal mistake that one won’t be able to correct. This mom did the right thing and I praise her. No appologies.
Report Post »Iron_Man
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:23amAt what age did she get married? And was her husband sick when she married him? How old was he? How tough is she to deal with death and deal death before she is 19? Why is the drinking age 21?
Report Post »RedHarley
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:31amMore proof that when SECONDS count, the police are only MINUTES away (in this case over 21 minutes)
Report Post »Get a gun, and learn how to properly use it.
Jacque
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:39amTHe “sad” guy who died was attempting to murder someone…no sadness to me!
Report Post »cracklehip
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:11amwhats sad is some jerk thinking its ok to break in to anyone house!!! especially knowing shes vulnerable
Report Post »ARMY93P3HVET
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:08amNot sure how you can see anything sad about this story other than the young lady having to deal with the memory of the shooting. If every citizen was armed crime on the inocent would dissapear.
Report Post »bullrider
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:12amSad? Not at all. This man was stalking her knowing that her husband was now dead. She and her daughter are safe from the POS who is now dead, and his accomplice is in jail. Mom and daughter are alive and well, and the taxpayers have saved a fortune. Think how “sad” things COULD have been.
Report Post »jonrod
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:38amI don’t see anything sad about the killing of a worthless intruder who felt that he was entitled to break into a persons home. It‘s to bad that this doesn’t happen more often, and at least that creep isn’t around to do the same thing in someone elses house.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:58amShe obviously made the right choice because she has clear ‘vision’. Good shootn’ Tex. I’m proud of you. And so will your child.
Report Post »Jim & Donna
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:00amI‘m sad that she didn’t shoot them both. It would have saved the American people the cost of a trial and jail for the second attacker. He’s just going to attack someone else when he gets out. My family knows to 1) shoot till the gun is empty, 2) reload, 3) repeat. 21 minutes for the cops to get there? Does anybody still wonder why we feel the need to protect ourselves?
Report Post »Charles O
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:08amWhat is sad is that this child had to take such drastic action so soon after her Husbands death to defend her life and that of her baby from the vermin who prey on innocent people. I am sure that someone in this peice of garbages family will want to sue her for worngful death or some other such crap, it has happened before. When someone is trying to break into your home 21 minutes can seem like a lifetime. I am not sure of just how big the town of Blanchard OK is, but honestly 21 minutes does seem to me to be just to long of a time frame. When seconds count the police are minutes away. Yes it seems strange to many that the dispatcher told her that she could not give the girl permission to use deadly force, but had the dispatcher done so the Department could then have been sued by the next of kin of the perp.
Report Post »Harpotoo
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 12:05pm21 minutes???? Where the hell were the cops??? PS and GOOD FOR her!
Report Post »Robert Williams
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 12:30pmI’m not the least bid sad that someone had to die. The only thing that makes me sad is that both of the perps didn’t die. This story leads my list of the “Feel Good Story Of The Year”.
Report Post »Evon22
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 12:46pmHe got what he wanted. It’s good she dropped him dead. Now, We don’t have to spend a million to prosecute the POS!
Report Post »24 years old — Wonder if he would do it differently if he new his drug addled body was going to be dead!
Goodforall
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 1:40pmWhy is that sad? This animal deserved what he got-imagine what he would have done had he gotten his hands on her? Good for her for defending herself and her son.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 1:49pmOh you can bet a lawyer has already contacted the man’s family to file a unlawful death suit on her. They will say that if she had been somewhere else….like at her husbands gravesite she wouldn’t have been there…thus no shooting would have taken place.
Report Post »catfish777
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 2:22pmCan‘t say I’m sad……………takes another creep off the street.
Report Post »leedef
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 2:39pmThank goodness this didn’t take place in Chicago, New York or Washington DC where it’s illegal to own a gun (unless of course you are a city official, a cop or A CROOK). If so, the Mom would now be in jail and up on murder charges. You go girl!
Report Post »Mountain Mama Martha
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:02pm@SpankDaMonkey…Just on the news, some are wanting her charged with 1st degree murder. They say she should have waited to see if he was ‘serious’ about using the knife. These HAVE to be stupid liberals. I pray the law enforcement will not listen to these kooks.
Report Post »hairyputter
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:12pmCan’t be sad about removing some vermin from this world.
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:13pmThe intruder knew her husband had just died. He was ready to take advantage of her situation. What a brave young woman. Good for her. He got exactly what he deserved.
Report Post »shakenblake5432
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:43pmGBTVFan_Non_American_Overseas
Amen to what you said, brother. It’s despicable that anyone would do such a thing to her, especially after her husband just died. I‘m sure he’s regretting it even more now, if you know what I mean.
Report Post »Celeste.Christi
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:58pmYou’re Sad Someone Had to Die??? He didn’t have to die – he should have obeyed the law, but since he didn’t he paid with his life. The only person in this scenario that deserves pity is the young woman that had to shoot him. What a nightmare. As for his being dead? Well, one less violent criminal for America to feed, house, and pay legal fees. Good riddance.
Report Post »vehoae
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:14pmI agree with you, POLWATCHER! There’s nothing sad about defending oneself. This young woman had been through so much already, with her husband dying a week earlier, but still had the strength and calmness needed to protect herself, child, and home. This all reminds me of Obama’s ongoing efforts to implement a new award for soldiers, called the “Courageous Restraint Award. NOW THAT’S SAD!
Report Post »moonlight on the bay
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:40pmSad someone had to die??? Better HIM that her and her son! These two melon farmers had to get past the couch she was using as a barricade! They were determined to get in. The only SAD thing HERE is that they BOTH didn’t die. Sad? This is a story with a happy ending! There aren’t ENOUGH stories like this where the homeowner gets the best of the intruder. If there WERE more stories like this, maybe the other potential intruders would take up another “line of work”. These guys underestimated this little lady, rolled the dice, and LOST. They are apparently unaware of the “occupational hazard” that comes with their actions. These two creeps get not one molecule of sympathy from me. I wish this lady and her son all the best in the future. She had a rough time, losing her husband so recently. She didn’t need these two rectal orifices to make the situation worse.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:01amWhy hasn’t the president or his wife called to congratulate McKinley?
Report Post »TheRealYosemiteSam
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 7:48amYour username tells me that you really want to be politically correct. I believe that is exactly why the country is where it is today. ANY person with evil in their mind, must be dealt with in this manner. No ifs, ands, or buts; If this story is accurate, and the deadee was stalking her, he needed to be dead the instant he kicked in the door, knife or no knife. I simply wish that pc wasn’t such an issue, as to make her say “I didn’t want to do it…”. Fact is, we ALL should send the ultimate message.
Report Post »nobamamamma
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:29amThese guys were beyhond evil. On the local tv news here in Tulsa they reported more details. These creeps were stalking her and broke in because her husband just died of lung cancer on Christmas Eve and they thought his leftover pain meds might still be there. Also, she did not have to ask permission in OK, shooting him was fine.
With the way this young lady kept her composure, she should enter the police academy herself! Her bravery and calmness was amazing for an 18 year old new mom who just lost her husband.
Report Post »eddibebbi
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:47amGood for her. The more “victims” do this, the less willing the bad guys will be to break into homes.
Report Post »Ortho
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:15pmEvery female should know how to protect themselves with a gun. Crimes would drop………..
Report Post »theaveng
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:59pmEVERYBODY dies.
This intruder just did it half-a-century ahead of schedule. He made the choice and I don’t feel sorry for him at all.
.
Report Post »Smooth1970
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:50amFor Faith1029: You do NOT have to ask permission to shoot an intruder in your home in any state that has the Castle Doctrine enacted. Oklahoma has that.
Report Post »I am very proud of this young woman, and I hope her actions will make another idiot think twice before stalking and attacking anyone. You just never know anymore who is armed!
sasquatch08
Posted on June 10, 2012 at 5:19am@RICKGY53
Where my parents live (a development 9 miles outside of town) the average time for the Sheriffs office to get someone on scene is 18 minutes.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:34pmShotgun and a shephard. That guy really was a nut to want to break in. One less bad guy.
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:09pmKick’in…….
Report Post »Yes…and remember this incident down the road when a ‘man’ shoots an intruder, especially a “Black” intruder.
I always tell my daughter’s to shoot anyone who has broken into their home, as a woman protecting her children will not face prosecution.
The one in Maine is a good shot (very good!). Would not want to be on the receiving end while she protects my gr-son!
CanteenBoy
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:51pmI have a large German Shepherd dog and I was wondering what her dog was doing for 21 minutes? How about a bark or two, some snarling teeth, wild eyes and flying spit?
Eva, my GSD, is as calm and gentle as a baby, but if she notices something wrong or God-forbid someone appears to be threatening, LTFO!
Report Post »yancie
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:15amWont the other guy catch a murder charge now?
Report Post »TommyGuns
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:34pmMost liberals/progressives are under the impression that the the police, fire department, etc., have an affirmative obligation to protect them. That’s not true at all. If you are the victim of a crime, you have recourse against the offender if they are found, but not against the police or the state. If your house is on fire and the fire department doesn’t get there in time, tough luck. They are not liable. Fortunately this woman had the means and the intestinal fortitude to protect herself and her child. Makes you wonder just what we are paying so much in property and other taxes for when you have to wait for 21 minutes and then still have to take matters into your own hands.
Report Post »LondoMollari
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:43pmShe was on the phone for 21 MINUTES with the dispatch. That’s over 1/3 of an HOUR.
Where were the police? And do you think she could have warded them with a speech?
Report Post »Jean3841
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:46pmDon’t try to pretend you know what progressives/liberals think.
Report Post »Snidely
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:31pmThe small town she lived in was 30 minutes from the nearest populated area (Norman, OK) that would have had law enforcement. Rural areas often don’t have the luxury of having police or fire departments available within minutes.
Report Post »GeoInSD
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:36pmWhy are some people so shocked that 21 minutes went by w/o the police showing up. One of the lessons here is one cannot DEPEND on the government doing all that they, in theory, should. If you think the police should always be able to come to the rescue, you are deluded. And what about people who couldn’t make it to the phone? What if the intruder invading the home faster? I am sure 21 minutes to complete entry to a home is a VERY long time.
The lessons here are there are bad guys, the government can’t always protect you, and the most effective protector of yourself and your family from home invaders is a prepared yourself.
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:23amAll I can say is “hats off” to her late old-man. He had the foresight to at least leave his woman with a large-bore side-by-side.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:32pmhow does it take 21+ minutes for the cops to get there?
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:36pmIn NY they would of been there in an instant to arrest HER.
Report Post »gidilh
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:04pmIn New York City a) she wouldn’t have been allowed to have a gun; and b) the story would have read “18-year old with baby raped and murdered.”
Report Post »swinetango
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:57pmLook you guys,you shouldn’t be so hard on the police.Where she lives is a rural community.They don’t have that much money to hire enough officers to patrol every square mile all the time.I’m glad she did what she did,she protected her son herself and her property.That is what our“Make My Day Law”was passed for.Bless her and her son and may God have mercy on the bad guy’s soul.
Report Post »LadyLibertea
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:57pmshe lives in the country….nothing is a few minutes away.
Report Post »imagery
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:09pmThat’s a fairly normal response time for the police. If you are ever in trouble, always call the fire department first. They will respond much quicker and most people will run when that much attention is brought to the scene.
Or, you do as she did; arm yourself and protect your family. Don’t ever rely on the government to protect you.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 11:53pmSome people live in rural areas and the sheriff could be an hour or more away. Within the City, the police might be many minutes away as well. It’s not like in the movies where they show up the minute a crime is committed. We should be so lucky.
Report Post »\
Get a gun and take lessons for your own safety. I live in a “Make my Day law” state where we, who have a gun, don’t have to worry what to do about an intruder. Warn them and shoot if they keep coming. I’ve had the safety classes and know what I can do legally, but being an excellent shot is helpful. Like the girl in this story, use a shot gun if you’re aim is off.
patriot308
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 2:30amNot abnormal at all for country dwellers. The area I grew up in; to this day takes 30 minutes, traveling at 90MPH. Not that I would have any personal knowledge of how long it takes going 90 plus……
Report Post »retire2014
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:01pmSwanpy, it takes at least 30 minutes from the nearest sheriff or state police post to get to where I live in the U.P. of Michigan. Sooner if they are on patrol on the nearest highway which is 10.5 miles away. Everyone who lives out here would be naive to think the response time of police or firefighters could be less. People know this, so they have a firearm handy at all times.
Report Post »Hard
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:32pmAwesome story. Girls should to be taught to kill predators so they don‘t have wonder if it’s OK.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:20pmMy daughter is three. She has already asked me to teach her to shoot. I told her she had to wait until she was six. A single shot 20 guage and squirrel hunting until she’s ready to kick the bryar patch for rabbits. She’ll be an accomplished shooter by eight.
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:49pmMy 14 year old got a 22 rifle for Christmas. She, along with her big sis, myself and my husband will be the baddest gun slingin’ family this side of the Mississippi!!! : > )
Report Post »Oh, and BTW, all the boys know we are armed… keeps ‘em at bay if you know what I mean!!
ozchambers
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:52pm@Justangry: That’s cool. Just please be super safe and don‘t let her handle anything that’s too much for a young girl. Make sure it’s a firearm that you know upside down and backwards and that you personally know to be suitable.
Sometime back I saw a story of a father who let his son (who was older than 8) shoot a micro uzi and the muzzle climb caused the boy to shoot himself in the head. I hate to say it, but that dad is as responsible for his son‘s death as if he’d given him the keys to a 900 HP ferrari after letting him sit in his lap and steer while driving his Chevette around the neighborhood.
Report Post »SistaTriscuit
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:37pmJustAngry, our 5 year old has had a single shot .22 Cricket rifle since she was 3 years old. My husband & I shoot together frequently, & she shoots with us. She also attends many 3-gun shooting competitions with her daddy, & is not squeamish about hunting or shooting animals for food. She is quite able to load, aim, shoot, kick out the brass, & reload all by herself. We obviously do not just “turn her loose” with a gun, we are ALWAYS right there, knelt down next to her to insure safety. She is VERY respectful of guns at 5 years old & understands that were she to encounter a weapon at someone else’s house that she does not touch it – but because we’ve taught her about gun safety starting at a very early age rather than making it taboo as so many people do, I believe she has a leg-up in the safety department. She understands safe handling practices, not “sweeping” people with a weapon (loaded or NOT), & knows how to determine if a safety is on or not. Don’t shy away from teaching them early – just instill safety safety safety. That is the surest way to keep them & others around them, well, safe. I wouldn’t have it any other way for our family & the age she started learning at.
Anyway – kudos to you for being another parent that will start their child early & SAFELY.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:41pmGood point Oz. I neglected to mention that part of the deal is she pass a hunter’s safety course.
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:06pmThat the 911 operator equivocated and would not tell her outright that she had the legal right to shoot the intruder still shows that the balance of power is skewed against the victim.
Report Post »dholio
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:30pmIt’s sad that someone had to ask if it were legal to kill an intruder who is breaking into the home and threatening the lives of her and her child…This woman is a hero and her and her child would probably be dead right now if she had not done what she did…Anyone who disagrees is on the wrong side of the law in my opinion.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:48amRose wow! we agree! Everyone is so afraid of being sued and or going to jail.
Report Post »DeavonReye
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:48amI think parents, who are 2nd ammendment friendly, should teach their kids [boys and girls] gun handling and safety early on. Get them excited about them, yet fill them with the knowledge to be secure in their safety and use. The less female victims, the better.
Where it is too bad someone had to die, . . . that guy COULD have been at home watching a good TV show instead of breaking into someone’s house with a knife with the intent to cause [illegal] trouble.
Report Post »macpappy
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:31pmSometimes a gals gotta do what a gals gotta do. You need to move to Texas honey.
Report Post »TXMomma
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:36pmOklahoma is a suburb of Texas.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 12:29amI agree. I need to move to Texas. My grandpa taught me to shoot a single shot 22 rifle when I was about 8 yrs old and I’ve had a love affair with guns ever since. When I married, my husbands family hunted deer and I was given a wonderful rifle. In short time I could shoot more accurately than the entire family. So, I was given a 22 pistol and never missed a can. Hunting, I wore my pistol in a holster and carried my rifle on my shoulder. I took only one shot to take down a deer and they dropped instantly, so I never felt like there was pain involved. Plus, we always used the meat.
As years went by, and I was alone, I decided I needed to be more proactive. So I took classes and learned the safety (which I already knew) and the laws for our area. Now, I want to move to Texas where my grandpa lived years ago.
Report Post »ColdDeadHands
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:29pmThe police are searching for evidence of a premeditated breakin?? Who the hel.. cares?? The guys were in her home, uninvited, and she felt threatened! Good for her, only wish she’d gotten the other guy as well.
Report Post »Gorp
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:35pmWell, see, if it’s premeditated then the perp will be deader. If it wasn‘t premeditated then he’s just dead.
Report Post »Old Truckers
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:43pmHey, if someone breaks into your home, isn’t that itself evidence of premeditation?
Report Post »thekuligs
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:54pmThat evidence would be to get a longer sentence for the one she didn’t shoot–not the dead guy.
Report Post »kkentucky
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:58pmI am thinking if it is premeditated, his buddy sitting in jail will have some responsibility for the death. When there is a death while someone is commiting a felony, even if it is the bad guy, then everyone involved in the original crime are responsibile for the death.
Report Post »BastiatsLaw
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:40pm@THEKULIGS is correct. Premeditation makes the crime more severe as it relates to the prosecution of the dead man’s cohort.
Report Post »Kiba
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:47pmOh crap you either live in a state that has the Castle Law or one that has a Retreat untill last resort law. But either way a jury will set her free. Oh wait a minute, I was thinking about the old U.S. of A. , now a days she would prolly do life and her kid be sold to the circus.
Report Post »JohnGalt007
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:52pmFinding the act premeditated allows the state to charge the other person with felony murder. He will be guilty of killing the dead guy and be eligible for the Oklahoma Death Penalty. A two-fer for the mom.
Report Post »nobull14
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:27pmShe did the right thing protect your self and the baby !!!!
Report Post »geoteach
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:25pm…just remember–Fast and Furious was designed by the Justice Dept. to undermine the Second Amendment. Obama trying to take our gun rights away leaving most of us unprotected. When Sarah’s life was on the line the cops were only five minutes away
Report Post »Drakkhanlord
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:36pmactually , it goes back along ways…remember iran/contra.
Report Post »you are correct that obama and holder are directly attacking the 2nd …
treason and sedition…the facts are there.
RightUnite
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:24pmGood for her!
Report Post »pjmarshake
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:24pmGod bless her, but her priorities were wrong. Next time shoot first, then call 911.
Report Post »Brad Brzezinski
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:33pmShoot the perp, fire a warning shot at the ground, THEN call 911.
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:23pmShoot first, call 911 after.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:32pmCall Stanley Steemer, then 911…
Report Post »FEMALL
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:18pmThe point is to have the entire “event” recorded.
Report Post »The Scarecrow
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:23pmSome of these headlines seem like the 911 operator told her to shoot the intruders which makes it sound like they were making a choice for her. They told her to do what she felt like she had to do which was to make the decision for her self. She made the decision she felt was right. People in Oklahoma know they will are taking their life in their hands if they break into someones house.
Report Post »Lefty leaning right
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:19pmShe did the right thing and I hope my wife would do the same, you have a right to protect your family and self anytime any place. G-d bless the 12 gauge and the willingness to use it !
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:24pmGood woman.
Report Post »korbin
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:27pmThat would be GOD it’s okay your among friends here. May Jesus bless you.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:43pmKorbin writes:
“That would be GOD it’s okay your among friends here. May Jesus bless you.”
———————————————————————
That would be “you’re” as in you + are. It’s okay, you’re among friends here, even those who are so respectful of God that they do not spell out His name. Mostly Jews do this, but not always. Would Jesus have made this kind of underhanded and irrelevant dig? Way to evangelize my brother!
Report Post »Jezreel
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:19pmMore citizens need to not be afraid of being prosecuted for defending their lives. It is sick how the rights of the criminal are considered more than those they hurt and kill. Basically, I think that that most of us are fed up and sick and tired of this liberal progressive crap that takes care of criminals more than the decent law abiding citizens. It is because most liberal progressives are criminal types so they are just protecting their own.
Report Post »Good for her! Yeah! It is sad that something like this had to happen so soon after her husbands death and I am sure her husband would be proud of her.
Charles
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:04pmExactly. The degenerates on the left do not want us to be able to defend ourselves. They want degenerates like themselves, and her attacker to be free to do as they please. in new york or any of the other liberal enclaves this woman would be prosecuted for what happened. That she felt the need to “ask permission” of some authority figure before defending herself infuriates me.
Report Post »MooseyStuff
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:19pmGood for her, I hope they had to use a sponge to clean up the mess from the D-Bag criminal. Where are all you filthy gun-control liberals now? Where were the police while she was on the phone for 21 minutes?
Report Post »Jean3841
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:51pmGun CONTROL is not a ban on guns. Gun control is about not selling guns to people with a criminal background and keeping armor piercing rounds out of the hands of criminals who would use them to kill cops wearing kevlar.
But hey, let’s use a story about a woman using a shotgun, which is not a concern for most gun control activists, to make it easier for criminals to buy heavy weaponry that can be used against cops! That sounds like a great idea!
Report Post »Mad Engineer
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:13pm@Jean…Gun Control is about how steady you hold your weapon of choice…Disarmament is about politicians deciding what your weapon of choice can be. Please learn the difference before making another foolish statment.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 12:34amThis is a joke: ” Gun Control means, just don’t pizz me off.” Just a joke I think is funny.
Report Post »David, the Constitutional Libertarian
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:18pmWOW, even in a screwed up state like New York, Illinois or Chicago, they could not get a conviction if you shot someone that you thought was trying to kill you. If they even attempted to press charges, I would say someone would be justified in doing something to the prosecutor.
We have the RIGHT, to Life, Liberty and Property. NO ONE, including the government has the right to take away your GOD given right to self protection.
Way to go girl! Too bad the buddy was not laid to rest also!
Report Post »GandolfTheWise
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 9:59pmObviously you have not read about past events in New York City – If you kill some that is threatening you with a weapon, and you shoot them, you will go to jail. (unless you are a politician, police, or a friend of a politician or police) They will stick you in jail for the mere possession and use of a firearm, no matter what your reasons are!
Report Post »David, the Constitutional Libertarian
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:23amThat is why I said conviction. I made a mistake in my comment, Chicago should have been California.
All it would take for someone being arrested for protecting themselves, to get released, would be to get media attention. If it happened anywhere near me, in Wisconsin, I would be at the DA’s office and the Sheriff day and night until the person was released.
Report Post »stoptheliesbho
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:18pmLove it!!!! Go Mama!
Report Post »NOBAMA201258
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:30pmDoes she have an older sister?
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:17pmI wouldn’t go knocking on her door to find out!
Report Post »Sergei
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:17pmHell Yea!!
Report Post »angelcat
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:17pmIt is really sad when citizens are so worried about being prosecuted for defending themselves that they feel they have to call for permission to defend themselves. Thank goodness this woman had a gun, knew how to use it, and did so. It may have saved her life and that of her baby. I’m sure liberal think what she did was really wise – asking for permission to defend herself.
Report Post »Captain77
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:23pmI agree its sad the young lady felt she had to ask permission to defend herself, but I love how the dispatcher responded, “do what you gotta do to defend your baby.” Ya, she was wise enough to give this young mother what she needed to hear.
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:23pmApplause for Sarah’s courage and cool headed approach. The intruder “Martin” learned real quick that you don’t bring a knife to a gunfight.
Report Post »Roberto G. Vasquez
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:24pmWell, one thing is for sure, the bad guy won’t be attacking any other women!!!
Report Post »Stu D. Baker-Hawk
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:25pmIs there any better testament for protecting our 2nd Amendment rights than what transpired in this story? When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
To the dead intruder: May God Almighty have mercy on your worthless, evil soul.
Report Post »HONORQUEST
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:15pmAnd she waited in the place of last refuge. Good for her.
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 4:07pmYep. She kept calm, assessed the situation and made the right decisions all the way around.
Report Post »I’m proud of this young lady.
Fullmagazine
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 1:18pmShe did everything right including the pistol for backup.
Report Post »Plus, 18 years old, with a newborn, and a recently desaesed husband.
I have often thought of “drilling” my family to react to such a situation. It doesn’t seem so insane to do such drills these days. I hope she has some family and friends to consult with after all of this.
JawaJam
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:15pmToo bad she missed the other one. What do you bet he tries to sue her for “emotional distress.”
Report Post »BIGJAYINPA
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:19pmGotta love Oklahoma 911. Operator said do what you got to do to protect yourself and baby. Up north they tell please do not shoot the dirtbags, wait for the Police to get there in their own sweet time and they will make a nice report before calling the cororner to get your body. Way to go sister, one less dirtbag to clog up the leagal system. Looking forward to reading this incident in the Armed Citizen section of The American Rifleman…….Just sayin’
Report Post »DAVIDTHETANK
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:01pmHe’ll probably try to sue for a new pair of pants.
Report Post »Mad Engineer
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:08pmUnder Oklahoma law, the idoit…uh..I mean nice gentleman just coming to visit…has no legal recourse to sue her.
Report Post »Julianbf
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:27amIf this were England he would sue and get her house and kid and she would go to prison, it happened!!!
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:13pmI love her!
Report Post »jedi.kep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:16pmI love her too!
Report Post »pap pap
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:13pmSorry she had to go through that but she did the right thing not just protectng the child but herself also. I would do the same thing for my bassett hound. Not the same league but you get my drift.
Report Post »Docrow
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:23pmyup
Report Post »Freedom Keeper
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:13pmGod bless the Momma Grizzly
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:29pmAmen!
Report Post »