Health

MSNBC Host: ‘Gendercide’ Is a Constitutional Right

Interpreting the United States Constitution is an extremely thorny job, not to be undertaken lightly by anyone, and most certainly not by amateurs. Indeed, the job of interpreting the constitution is so difficult that American society has only deemed a grand total of 9 lawyers capable of doing it at any one time.

Unfortunately, even those lawyers haven’t always come to conclusions that follow from the document. Which has, in turn, led many confused people to believe the Constitution actually says things that in actuality were only dreamed up by judges. For instance, the “right” to an abortion appears nowhere in the text of the Constitution.

However, even the judges who supported that particular “right” probably wouldn’t have gone as far as MSNBC host Alex Wagner, who more or less implied that the “right to choose” implies the right to choose a child’s gender by systematically terminating any fetus that develops the wrong set of sex organs. Mercifully, GBTV’s S.E. Cupp was there to call her on it:

The brief, 30 second exchange can be summed up as follows. Wagner and Democratic strategist Patti Solis Doyle accuse the GOP of “fear mongering” by raising the subject of sex-selective abortion, claiming the fight over this was settled “20 years ago.”

In response, S.E. Cupp replies, with more than a hint of sarcasm, “I don’t remember having this fight. The fight over, ‘can you kill babies,’ yeah, but ‘can you kill them because you wanted a boy?‘ I don’t remember having this fight.”

“The fight over a woman’s right to choose was settled by the Supreme Court,” Wagner replies with enough smugness to kill a small animal.

“To choose the gender?” Cupp fires back.

“It‘s about a woman’s right to choose,” Wagner repeats, as though speaking to a child.

Now, one fact should be noted regarding this particular exchange, which occurred in a debate over a law that would have banned sex-selective abortions, and which failed to pass Congress today. However, had it passed, then it‘s far from clear that Wagner’s monomaniacal reliance on an existing Constitutional right would convince a court to strike the law down. This is hardly the first time an established constitutional right has been curtailed in the name of fighting private discrimination. In fact, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned businesses from discriminating on the basis of color, did precisely the same thing in curtailing the rights to assembly and property (rights which actually appear in the Constitution) as a method of fighting segregation. No Constitutional right is absolute, and it’s silly for Wagner to pretend that this one is.

Comments (187)

1 2 3 ... 5
  • freyou
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:56pm

    Women have the right to choose to kill future women, who could have a killing choice of their own. Irony?

    Report Post »  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:59pm

      Yeah, Rush pointed out today that this is just more of the Left’s War on Women.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:08pm

      If they keep killing girls all we have is gay marriage…….

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Dockta
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:10pm

      Look at this way, the Dems voted down a bill prohibiting selective gender abortions, Lib women want to abort their daughters, MSNBC supports it…let them. Are conservative women going to abort their sons or daughters, no. In essence, Democrats are killing themselves, maybe into extinction.

      Report Post »  
    • lisalake
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:19pm

      What say the hookers of “NOW”?

      Report Post »  
    • loriann12
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:21pm

      If they knew for sure that the baby girl would grow up to be a lesbian, would they let her live?

      Report Post »  
    • 000degrees
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:29pm

      Does God watch msnbc????

      Report Post »  
    • Cosmos102
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:42pm

      It’s still wrong to abort babies Dokta, but you made a good point.

      Report Post » Cosmos102  
    • dealer@678
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:48pm

      I have often wondered if their is a curse on women because of this abortion crap. Breast cancer seems like it strikes every family nowadays. Never used to hear about it. Just my thought

      Report Post »  
    • survivorseed
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 9:44pm

      If you’re against abortion, don’t have one. Simple

      Report Post »  
    • silentwatcher
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 9:54pm

      No,,,it is NOT a constitutional right. Where do you come up with this b*llsh*t?? do the liberal socialistic dummycrats have a different, handwritten copy of the constitution that the rest of America doesn’t have??? it really sounds like it. learn to read and get a life.

      Report Post »  
    • DeanoDean
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 9:59pm

      @survivorseed
      If I’m against abortion, don’t make me pay for yours. Very simple.

       
    • dealer@678
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 10:41pm

      Republicorp, I dont even wanna think about a world without women. My 2 best friends are my grown daughters.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 12:08am

      colt1860
      A newborn is living in the world not its mother’s body, so it can exercise free will, and because it is now perceiving the world through its senses the development of a human mind has begun.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 7:23am

      Oops, posted that in the wrong place and addressed to the wrong person. Sorry.

      Report Post »  
    • disenlightened
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 8:12am

      Homosexuals be warned: After 60 years of searching, scientists have yet to find the magic gay gene. But, what if they do? And what if prospective parents decide…we don’t want a gay child…rip it out! I think they will, too. In one generation, your species will be gone. Choose life, gay brothers and sisters! Hahaha.

      Report Post » disenlightened  
    • shiftingcargo
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 4:18pm

      Why is it that a woman has a right to kill her child but she does not have a right to be a prostitute? If a woman is in control of her body, why can’t she sell it for sex? Why can’t she sell a kidney? It is “her body” after all. The government tells women they cannot sell their bodies; they cannot sell a kidney. A woman can only kill her child. Not really many choices there ladies. One. Big whoop. When will women wake up and realize the government controls their body, not them.

      Report Post »  
  • momrules
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:54pm

    These self righteous, ignorant, arrogant people that think the murder of millions of babies will go unnoticed by God make me sad and angry.

    The murder of the unborn, whether for convenience or gender selection, is a sin against God. The people that preach that it is a woman’s right are just as guilty of that sin as the one who has the abortion or the one who performs it is.

    Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:08pm

      Nah, I was talking to God just the other day, and He told me that it’s not murder, and He has no problem with it.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:19pm

      James Wilson, a framer of the U.S. Constitution, explained as follows:

      “With consistency, beautiful and undeviating, human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law. In the contemplation of law, life begins when the infant is first able to stir in the womb. By the law, life is protected not only from immediate destruction, but from every degree of actual violence, and, in some cases, from every degree of danger.”

      In colonial America, abortions were prosecuted under the common law. After the Revolution, the new American states adopted the common law of England as the basis of their own law, including common law crimes.

      Report Post »  
    • tzion
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:21pm

      @Chet
      Why don’t you give me the legal or scientific definition of what makes someone a person? A satisfactory answer would specifically include how a newborn is a person but an unborn is not. While you‘re doing that why don’t you explain exactly how an unborn child is part of its mother’s body if:
      1. It has its own distinct DNA.
      2. It has its own blood and circulatory system (it has a heartbeat)
      3. It has its own central nervous system

      Report Post »  
    • Rajabear1
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:23pm

      I have to say, I am a bit confused.
      Why is it that the libs insist that conservatives or Christians don‘t ’believe’ in science, yet the more scientifically advanced we become and can determine factual things such as development of a baby in utero and no presence of a ‘homosexual gene’ they insist we are stupid even with scientific facts to back us up, but things like man made global warming and their theory of how life began is a closed subject even though there is no fact to conclusively back it up? Not even close.
      It’s as though they live in a la la land. Why do they hate science and facts soo dang much?
      I might be a big dumb-dummy, but when you start deciding to end a life based on gender, the thought of ending life based on hair color or race, class levels, political persuasions of the parents is not far behind.
      That a person could have this discussion w/o feeling a twinge of anything, may just prove how depraved their conscience and soul truly are.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:37pm

      Here are some scientific facts to consider also:

      “Day 22: heart begins to beat with the child’s own blood, often a different type than the mothers’.”
      nrlc.org/abortion/facts/fetaldevelopment.html

      “5 weeks: Also the placenta begins functioning, known as the chorionic villi and the umbilical cord, through which the baby will receive nourishment and oxygen.”
      baby2see.com/development/first_trimester.html

      “The placenta has been described as a pancake-shaped organ that attaches to the inside of the uterus and is connected to the fetus by the umbilical cord…The placenta is responsible for working as a trading post between the mother‘s and the baby’s blood supply. Small blood vessels carrying the fetal blood run through the placenta, which is full of maternal blood. Nutrients and oxygen from the mother’s blood are transferred to the fetal blood, while waste products are transferred from the fetal blood to the maternal blood, without the two blood supplies mixing.”
      americanpregnancy.org/duringpregnancy/fetallifesupportsystem.html

      Life is in the blood. Leviticus 17:11-14; Genesis 9:4, 6-7

      “All men are CREATED equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

      A child in the womb IS formed, or CREATED, with ALL HIS RIGHTS ATTACHED, as his Rights are UNALIENABLE, inherent, and NATURAL. The state cannot deny that which God has granted.

      Report Post »  
    • TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:53pm

      Republicans voting against the bill (PRENDA) were Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Charlie Bass (N.H.), Mary Bono Mack (Calif.), Robert Dold (Ill.), Richard Hanna (N.Y.), Nan Hayworth (N.Y.),

      aaaaaaaand of course…. Dr “NO”… Ron Paul (Texas).

      The bill’s author, Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said before the vote that whatever the outcome, the point would be made that “When people vote on this…,

      …the world will know where they really stand.”

      Report Post » TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 7:22am

      tzion
      Human intelligence is what makes someone a person. A newborn is living in the world not its mother’s body, so it can exercise free will, and because it is now perceiving the world through its senses the development of a human mind has begun. For the reasons you mentioned, a fetus is not truly part of the mother’s body, but it is also not yet a person. Just in case it does start to experience some form of sensory perception prior to birth, I consider it generally preferable to not kill a fetus in the last month or two of gestation.

      Report Post »  
    • tzion
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 8:18am

      @chet
      You’re arguing without knowledge. A newborn‘s mental development is so low it can’t even recognize faces for at least a month or two. All it perceives is undefined images and sounds, the same as before it was born. In fact, the Blaze even reported on an “ethicist” who said that if it is okay to abort a child it should be okay to “abort” a newborn.

      On top of that, your argument has farther reaching effects than you realize. What about people who through illness or injury have no upper brain function? What about coma patients or the elderly with dementia? And you still didn‘t explain how the mother gets to be the decision maker for life or death of a human life that by your own admission isn’t part of her body.

      Once again, you used the word “person” to make a point when there is no scientific definition for person-hood. I can test to see if a fetus is human, I can‘t test to see if it’s a person. How can you be certain it isn’t one?

      Report Post »  
    • tzion
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 8:27am

      One more thing Chet,
      If a woman can decide whether her unborn child will live or die, why are people not allowed to commit suicide and why is assisted suicide considered to be murder?

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:41pm

      tzion
      Obviously the formation of a human mind doesn’t happen overnight. I see birth as the point when the process really begins, and then say don’t abort for a month or two before that just to be on the safe side.

      What about people who through illness or injury have no upper brain function?
      Kill them.

      What about coma patient ..
      It depends, people do come out of comas sometimes. You have to make that call on a case by case basis knowing what caused the coma, how long have they been in, how deep is it, etc.

      the elderly with dementia?
      If they’re still speaking occasionally, then they are at least smarter than an animal, whether anything they say makes sense or not. If they get to the point when the have less of a mind than a newborn infant, then kill them.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 5:52pm

      tzion
      If a woman can decide whether her unborn child will live or die, why are people not allowed to commit suicide and why is assisted suicide considered to be murder?

      Who says people aren’t allowed to commit suicide? They do it every day. If you try and fail they hold you for three days, but you’re free to try again after that. I never said you aren’t allowed to commit suicide. Call me up in the middle of the night and all you’ll get is “Well, okay. It sounds like you have good and valid reasons. Go ahead.”

      Assisted suicide has to be illegal just because that’s the only way to keep people form murdering their relatives and claiming it was an assisted suicide. I favor giving the terminally ill access to firearms and explosives so they won’t have to ask someone else to do their dirty work.

      Report Post »  
  • garbagecanlogic
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:54pm

    After listening to the exchange, I can readily see where the parents of two female fetus’s should have been terminated and one of them is no Ms. Cupp.

    Praise Be To Obama. Psalm 109:9

    The U.S. Out Of The U.N.
    The U.N. Out Of The U.S.

    Report Post »  
  • usmc1063
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:54pm

    That is the most asinine thing I have ever heard. The minds at MSNBC are truly the sickest and most depraved on air today. No wonder their raiting are in the cellar.

    Report Post » usmc1063  
  • nighttrainno9
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:53pm

    These narsissitic liberals are commiting murder and nowhere
    in the constitution does it say you have the right to commit
    murder. I cannot believe how far down the morality pole
    the USA has slipped. This country is so entrenched in evil
    I’m surprised God has not disposed of it like he did with
    sodam & gomorrah. Murdering babies is basically the most
    wretched thing a human can do. If I was God, I would be pissed.

    Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:25pm

      “Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth: for the Lord hath spoken, I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me. The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master’s crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider. Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the Lord, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward. Why should ye be stricken any more? ye will revolt more and more: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores: they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with ointment. Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers… Hear the word of the Lord, ye rulers of Sodom; give ear unto the law of our God, ye people of Gomorrah… Woe unto the wicked! it shall be ill with him: for the reward of his hands shall be given him. As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths. The Lord standeth up to plead, and standeth to judge the people.”

      Report Post »  
  • krod2516
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:50pm

    These women are disgusting. They have shown there colors and may God have mercy on their soul.

    Report Post »  
    • Mtroom
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 3:22pm

      I’m sorry, but this part of women’s rights is B.S.. Because you have rights, doesn’t mean you can just fling you legs open to any guy you wish.. You are still responsible for yourself.. I was taught if I were to get a girl pregnant, I was to be a man and do the right thing.. I chose my partner carefully.. We are raising our child, together… Women, you need to be held to the same standard.. I bet if you look at the unwanted pregnancies before women’s rights passed, the difference would be staggering.. Now, I‘m not saying women shouldn’t have rights, but you need to use your rights responsibly… Put these women through the “Shotgun Wedding” paces.. Because you see women, you have never dealt with the fear of a girls old man once you got her pregnant.. Men still deal with that, even if you get an abortion… Women can blame men all they want, but they are holding the reset button.. And men will keep on playing, as long as they keep pushing it… Abortion, get the F outa here, and women up.

      Report Post » Mtroom  
  • neckcarjim
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:50pm

    I just don‘t get it according to progressives it’s ok to kill a unborn child because of it’s gender. But if I want to kill a kitten to make a nice set of gloves I should be arrested and charged with animal cruility.

    Report Post » neckcarjim  
  • smokeyridgerunner
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:47pm

    Why don’t someone kill you, you are a girl.

    Report Post »  
  • HKS
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:47pm

    Since when is any murder a constitutional right?

    Report Post » HKS  
  • NewLife56
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:47pm

    MSNBC: ‘Gendercide’ Is a Constitutional Right

    Evil has a new home…MSNBC

    Report Post » NewLife56  
  • Shasta
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:47pm

    SE said it was “killing babies”, in other words, murder. No one flinched. This country is doomed.

    Report Post » Shasta  
  • Oraclevoiceofreason
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:46pm

    the idiocy is sometimes too much for me to believe. Fine let them believe it’s OK ( constitutionally acceptable and supported ) to KILL babies – why don’t they just say what it is. we want to kill babies because we hate babies – woman should just be able to be whores and have sex with any dirtbag they want without any responsibility for another life… just kill it…ooooo especially if you don’t like the SEX – oh I mean gender of the child… but wait – what if they kill a baby boy but it’s really a baby girl – because that baby would be gender challenged if allowed to live and …

    Report Post » Oraclevoiceofreason  
    • Quack Addict
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:52pm

      I see why liberals don’t believe in God, they think they ARE gods! Pathetic.

      Report Post » Quack Addict  
  • kspatriot
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:45pm

    She “chose” to spread her legs, and when she got pregnant, the babies rights began. She has to take responsibility for the consequences of her “choosing” to spead her legs. That doesn’t include aborting a life.

    Report Post » kspatriot  
    • creepshow
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:49pm

      Alex Wagner has in effect just admitted she is a sociopath.
      Aborting a fetus because of sex is the act of a sociopath – period.

      Report Post »  
  • Tigress1
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:44pm

    Americans now have the “Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and gendercide”.

    Report Post » Tigress1  
    • justangry
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:13pm

      Well we don’t have the right to liberty for sure. Republican’s oppose liberty too, btw. More so than the Dem’s to be honest. Life… not really either because they can kill you with a drone and without due process. Republicans are fine with that too. Pursuit of happiness… unless a “Big Gulp” makes you happy. Genderside.. that’s where the Republicans FINALLY draw the line. Thanks Washington… you guys are GREAT!!

      Report Post » justangry  
    • Tigress1
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:47pm

      @Justangry, Republicans want are pro-drones? That’s news to me. Drones are mostly Obama’s babies. I don’t think they belong in America except for MAYBE on the border. Muslim countries – fine. They aren’t Americans. Democrats are afraid that Big Gulps kill people, but they aren’t afraid of … well… things that DO kill people such as ABORTIONS.

      Report Post » Tigress1  
    • justangry
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 9:10pm

      Domestic drone policy would not have passed the house if the Republicans didn’t want them. Check again, most of the RNC is fine with it. They’re also fine with those drones killing American citizens and the US considered a battlefield.

      Report Post » justangry  
  • MBA
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:44pm

    There are a lot of sick and disgusting people in this country. Liberals must be so proud of being depraved and dispicable just like Dr. mengele.

    Report Post »  
    • TurboCat
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 6:37am

      I don‘t think the word ’sick’ is the word I would use. Sick people are different from twisted people. Evil and twisted, because sick people means they have a physical or mental affliction. But these people have a spiritual or moral affliction. They are morally bankrupt. Not sick.

      Report Post »  
  • vyochum
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:44pm

    I dont recognize my own country anymore. Christians need to wake up soon. It doesnt matter what party you belong to. God is our moral leader and we have let him down. I pray everyday for the part I had in our country becoming this. I sat back and raised my children and didn’t pay attention to the things around me. I’m awake and hoping others are becoming more aware. We are lost sheep, the good news is, we can still turn this around. Get involved and tell your neighbors what is happening. I want God to be proud of America. I want God to know how thankful we are, instead of spitting at him. Please God help us and show us the way again.

    Report Post »  
    • smokeyridgerunner
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:51pm

      Because they are still at they’ll shell not kill. The Jews would still have nothing if they did not kill and a lot of the time it was God telling them to kill all the people in town.

      Report Post »  
  • HKS
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:43pm

    Liberals are what they are, baby killers. Calling them anything else is just lipstick on a pig

    Report Post » HKS  
  • JACKTHETOAD
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:42pm

    Drink lead paint and gasoline and die Alex Wagner – bitch-bastard PIG!!!

    Report Post » JACKTHETOAD  
  • gyro
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:42pm

    I cant speek my mind about what happens to 10′s of thousands of babys every year in INDIA

    Report Post »  
  • Doctor Nordo
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:41pm

    Ms. Cupp‘s argument doesn’t really hold much water. Aborting a baby because it’s not a boy or not a girl is no worse (in my opinion) than aborting because having a baby is an inconvenience or as a method of birth control. They are all despicable rationalizations.

    Report Post » Doctor Nordo  
    • Snidely
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:29pm

      That’s what I thought of this issue. I can’t think of any reason to kill an unborn baby. Abortion for convenience (”we just weren’t ready for a baby”) is every bit as appalling as abortion for sex selection. I don‘t understand why we’re supposed to be more outraged over this. I’m just as outraged over any abortion.

      Report Post » Snidely  
    • Nancys Red Diaper Doper Babies
      Posted on June 1, 2012 at 12:42am

      It’s true that the end result is the same but the intent is different, and much more malicious. The left has framed the arguement for abortion around the idea that the mother, or parents, don’t want to bring a child into the world that they can not, or don’t want to, take care of and thus by terminating it‘s life it’s one less child the Government has to provide for.
      However, when one chooses to terminate based on gender one must assume that the mother, or parents, are willing to have a child, just not one of a specific gender. That is a vastly different premise that the left’s original arguement. Unless females babies are more dangerous to deliver than male babie which lend itself to the woman‘s health arguement but I’d enjoy seeing someone make that case.
      Lastly, a woman would have to wait longer to abort if waiting for confirmation on gender which would also potentially cost the tax payer more in mediciad. There are moral and fiscal differences.

      Report Post »  
  • Laus Deo
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:41pm

    If the left wants a fight, I‘ll give ’em that fight.. Not all life is precious, as displayed by these sick SOBees. I’ll take the side of those in the womb.

    Report Post » Laus Deo  
    • creepshow
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:53pm

      You’ll “give ‘em a fight” huh? By doing what? Running your mouth while your a** is glued to the couch? STFU you ignorant Gomer.

      Report Post »  
    • mr.goodvibe
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 8:43pm

      I have always thought innocent life, that of a child, young or unborn is precious but when it comes to someone who wants to end mine for no reason then the value I place on them is 0.

      Report Post » mr.goodvibe  
  • ZomBrad
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:40pm

    I’m pro-choice too! It’s my right to choose NOT to go to work tonight, but still get paid……hey man….it’s in the constitution :D

    Report Post »  
    • LadyLibertykicksASS
      Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:57pm

      Just wait until these lovely people decide You just don’t measure up, my friend. The next thing will be
      retro-active Birth Control, mark my word !. Eugenics is coming.

      Report Post »  
  • Psychosis
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:39pm

    women have the right to choose

    what is arguable is WHEN THAT CHOICE OCCURS

    does it occur BEFORE you participate in an act that might end in pregnany

    or

    does that choice occur AFTER you have acted, and you are merely choosing the consequence

    i believe that womans choice comes BEFORE she decides to act, thus anything that happens AFTER that choice is called consequence, and she should learn to accept that

    choice

    action

    consequence

    liberals really really hate that last part

    Report Post » Psychosis  
  • Wilma
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:37pm

    Do the libs understand how barbaric they sound when they make these statements?

    Report Post » Wilma  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on May 31, 2012 at 7:37pm

    How do you sit with these wretches, S.E? Anyway, these ‘ladies’ are the saddest humans on earth. They will be equally sad in eternity if they keep this evil up.

    MSNBC, you are many things, but mostly wicked. May you fail sooner than later for the sake of the unborn and so many other people that watch your tripe.

    Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 5

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love