Media
MSNBC’s L. O‘Donnell Loves Paul Ryan’s ‘Socialistic Notion’!
- Posted on January 26, 2011 at 12:25am by
Meredith Jessup
- Print »
- Email »
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (68)
awizard
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 7:04amWell, if you don’t have anything to say … just say something stupid.
Report Post »beckwill
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 6:57amIs Lawrence O’Donnell Niles from Frasier? Oh, I shouldn’t insult that little actor guy like that now should I?
Report Post »jedi.kep
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 6:43amWow. That was one big gathering of idiots all in one place. I‘m surprised a black hole didn’t open up or something.
Report Post »JROCCOD
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 6:34amAnd these moroms get paid to do this?????
Report Post »sandyn
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 5:55amWhy must we throw the bunch in the Pacific. Some of us like that ocean.
Report Post »dizzyinthedark
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 5:41amZZZZZZZZZZZ…..this show, these people need to go by the wayside. They are on the road though with their lame commentary only to be met at the dead end by their cronies, Rick Sanchez, Keith Olberman, Al Grayson, etc. welcoming them.
Report Post »NHABE64
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 5:18amMSNBC is a socialist station that supports Obama’s radical agenda. Most people know that. Paul Ryan is a very intelligent man who sees the future of America if we don’t make some quick smart changes. He is right on and it tears up the Left to hear the truth. America must listen closely to what he says or it might just be over for all of us. MSNBC, your nothing more than cockroaches barking at George Soro’s table for scraps and you know it and we know it.
Report Post »GIVEMETHEREDPILLPLEASE
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:30amNeed a soap box Troy?
Report Post »questionwithboldness
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:17amcondescending attitude
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 2:28amDid anyone notice that President Obama said: “By the opportunities for a better life that we pass on to our children.” tonight?
I immediately thought that he had finally come around to getting rid of the Estate Tax (Death Tax), and people that had built up a small business or farm could pass them on to the next generation.
Report Post »GONESURFING
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 4:09amWould be nice, but don’t bet on that one. Obama is as good a lier as Bill Clinton.
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:59amSuggesting that Paul Ryan is for Socialism isn’t funny – it’s just dumb.
Report Post »TRUTHSEEKINGAL
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 2:19amWhat a sputnik..run out of steam and spiral in a tailspin.
Report Post »Vunks
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 2:45amHe voted for all the bailouts, Fascist would be the correct name for him.
Report Post »GONESURFING
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:17amVUNKS, how does this make him a fascist ?, or are you talking about Obama ? Did he really vote for all the bailouts ? Not so sure about that. Paul Ryan, socialist ? fascist ? I don’t think so.
Report Post »Vunks
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 5:54amPaul Ryan voted for all the bailouts and the Stimulus,and the take over of GM. FASCIST!!!!
Report Post »henryKnox
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 11:49amSpeaking of fascism. Read ‘The Road to Serfdom’ by Hayek. It was written during the time of the National Socialists movement and it is sureal to see how we are repeating history. The amazing job that the Progressives have done to dumb down the American public so that we don’t understand the dangers of Socialism, Fascism and Progressivism. I wish this book was required study for all high school students.
Report Post »marklross
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:33amI wonder what O’donnel would have to say if he really knew the history of his hero Bismarck who first called his programs “practical Christianity” and only later accepted the label of “state socialism” applied to his programs by his more liberal opponents…What a douche “O’donnel is…
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:21amsigh. it just never frickin ends. we’d like to throw all those useless obama democrats and their trash in a stupid ”safety net” and throw it in the loony Pacific.
Report Post »Twinspeedr
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:21amTWO MSNBC HOSTS IN A ROW, IN THE SAME TIME SLOT ATTACKING BECK!!!!!! Are you kidding me?!!!!! What are the odds that this is a coincidence…?
Report Post »New-American-Saviors
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:20amBlah, Blah, Blah…anyone that tunes in to MSNBC is missing the point….America is making a resurgence and has NOTHING to do with the Government under Obama. We’re waking up …None too soon.
Report Post »FOX is the ONLY truthful source and I’ve seen them all.
Edgar Bennet
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:14amThink on your own guys. What O’Donell says is true. But I just hope Paul doesn’t really believe it, it’s pandering to the middle so as not to sound harsh (hopefully)
Report Post »1TrueOne55
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:10amWhat Ryan is alluding to is that if Republicans get their way is that younger people will get private accounts or SS will not be deducted from their paychecks so they could apply that money into a private savings account that Gov’t has not stake in. I have said that when I was 20yrs old that if the Gov‘t would let me keep my money and i put it in a private savings account I would have more money than if the Gov’t kept it for me. And my thoughts were true then and they are true now.
Report Post »Edgar Bennet
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:29am“and to help provide a safety net for those who cannot provide for themselves.”
Those words don’t translate to saving your own money. We don’t want to fall into the same traps of the left and make excuses or reinterpret the statements the representatives on OUR side are making. We can’t let ourselves be politically herded and used
Report Post »spirited
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:13amwill not get “ANY’ social security. …eh?
>safety net seems a contadiction
Report Post »reckless
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:11amOnly a devoted liberal socialist like O‘Donnell could take Ryan’s remarks and pull such a twisted analysis out of his ass.
Report Post »Quencher
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:06amA different delivery by Obama of the same communist goals as always. A little transparent spin but the same goal of destroying America as a free nation. Laugh at Paul Ryan if you choose, but he is the voice of reason and the voice of the huge majority of Americans as we will see as thing evolve in Congress.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:06amMSNBC with a full panel of extremist. How could anyone expect responsible and truthful statements? More radical propaganda. I think they were rated 28th in news programs. Oh yeah, FOX had the top 12.
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 7:40amMany of those who watch the MSNBC Pundits do so, like me, to see just how far these IDIOTS will go. I can’t take but so much so any one time I spend with them is “clicking through” ; as long as these guys spew their PROPAGANDA OF COMMUNISM with the venom and lies, we WILL have problems. It seems to me, they are “pushing” for conflict for by conflict they have their ONLY voice. And ALL attacks are ad hominem (against a person) rather than supporting their position with facts; and EMOTIONAL, exposing the appeal to “Crazies” who can’t think for themselves. “Wisdom is the principle thing; therefore get WISDOM and with all thy getting, get UNDERSTANDING”. Proverbs 4:7
Report Post »BoilitDown
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:05amWhen Matthews laughs at your ridiculousness, it’s time to take stock of yourself.
Report Post »O’Donnell is a true believer in socialism. No true believer (fundamentalist) of any ideology has the capacity for objectivity.
He knows very well that Ryan’s “safety net” has no resemblance to socialism. O’Donnell has shown that any time he can inject “socialism” into a comment, he is more than happy to do so.
Rogue
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:01amYou misinterpreted it, Mr. O’Donnell. Ryan said “Provide a safety net”, which is our duty as Americans for those who need a hand up… if it were meant to be a socialist design, he would have said “Provide a hammock”.
Report Post »Vunks
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 2:42amNo safety nets are against free narket, hence socialist.
Report Post »portague
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:14amI believe what he ment if i am not mistaken is a hand up not hand out
Report Post »hand outs are socialists agendas hand up is helping someone stand on their own
or the saying feed a man a fish feed him for a day teach him to fish feed him for life.
All entitlements fall under hand outs they do not trully help the person because they will back again with open hands asking for more. Where as a hand up the person seeks his own and is capable of doing it himself. So offering hand up would be more american and much more cheritable.
Vunks
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 5:54amI believe he is a lying fascist who should be thrown out of the Republican Party.
Report Post »scout n ambush
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:01amMsnbc’s whole news anchor line up sat around looking scared but defiant and talking about how obama needed to push forward with the progressive agenda .
Report Post »timeisnow
Posted on January 27, 2011 at 4:35pmYeah thats not going to work, didnt they see Novembers elections from their houses???LOL What a bunch of losers sitting like ducks in a row spew Progressive propaganda, what a waste of TV time… thank God i didnt watch them or Obama…
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 12:59amThat last sentence about safety net,
Report Post »I’ve heard Democrats say it all the time.
So are they socialists too or only Ryan is a socialist because he is a Republican ?
scout n ambush
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:18amYou have to admit watching the msnbc crowd after the speech by Big Owe and Paul Ryan was more fun than the SOTU speech itself they tried hard to grasp at straws and spin it for obama LOdonell is a admitted socialist .I got more laughs than watching Benny Hill show.
Report Post »taxed
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 12:57amWhat in the hell is he talking about??
And I thought Olbermann got fir…. oh, wait… that’s Maddow…
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:05amDithering idiots .. MSNBC has so many … one down …
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:10amO’Donnell is right about government funded safety nets: that’s Socialism.
We don’t need safety nets when “Race to the Bottom” meets “Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law”.
Report Post »taxed
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 1:16amI would prefer zero government subsidies, but helping people with very temporary and transitional assistance is not killing our budget.
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com
Report Post »GONESURFING
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 2:41amLooks like the O’Dumbell group to me.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 2:53amRespectful adjustment to Doctor’s Labor: We DO need safety nets. Private ones. We should all be wise enough to make room for things we can’t control in our plans. But since govt will ALWAYS mismanage those funds due to its fundamentally unaccountable nature, and then petulantly demand more money and more control as the solution to the problem it created, you‘re still right to point out the truth in O’Donnell’s socialism comment.
Report Post »taxed
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:22amMy point is temporary unemployment, etc., is like clipping your dog’s nails, while he has a 100 foot tapeworm…
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com
Report Post »GBMBulletsSKNRD
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 3:39amYou have got to be kidding me!!!!! I am not one to say shut down freedom of speech but how crazy are these numbnuts. I mean come on just 2 or months ago this guy was admitting that he was a Socialist.
Report Post »historyguy48
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 7:03amHis comment is correct. The “safety net” is a socialist mindset, not a part of the constitution. If we are to eliminate the cancer throughout our political system we must go completely back to the constitution. If a “safety net” is to be created it would require an amendment to the constitution.
Report Post »The problem is basic; this is just talk. There is no way an politician is going to spread has pixy dust, delete non-constitutional programs (almost all of this bloated mess) and stablize our currency by biting the (paper) bullet, doing away with the FED, and COINING money with value.
Ironmaan
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 7:04amProtection from foreign invaders and building roads are the only two socialized programs government should be involved in.
Report Post »http://guerillatics.com
Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 26, 2011 at 7:26amSuch a gathering of hate-mongers… I’m looking forward to seeing the viewers numbers on the SOTU night coverage.
Report Post »timeisnow
Posted on January 27, 2011 at 4:32pmWow what a Socialist group, altogether in one room…Typical MSNBC bunch of stupid Whack Jobs!
Report Post »