Campus Shock: Michigan Professor Actually Takes Nude Pictures…With Students
- Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:29pm by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
EAST LANSING, Mich. (The Blaze/AP) — A Michigan State University associate professor’s nude photographs that show him posing with students — both clothed and nude — have prompted questions about art and ethics among some associated with the school.
Danny Guthrie’s work is well-known by campus officials, who have reviewed the issue, The Detroit News reported Wednesday. But coverage by The State News student newspaper drew recent attention at the East Lansing campus to Guthrie’s photos, which depict the 65-year-old teacher bare-chested in some photos, while in others he’s fully clothed. Guthrie poses with male and female students, faculty and colleagues and often is touching them.
In an email to The Detroit News, Guthrie, whose biography on the university’s website says he has been a faculty member there for 13 years, declined an interview and wrote: “It is not a great climate for being edgy in the area of sexuality.”
But, The State News did have an account from Guthrie about his work:
Guthrie said the photographs are based on famous works of art throughout history and represent how individuals interact.
“[The photographs are] about my loss of youth and impending doom,” he said. “Once you give up when you get older, you don’t live in a sexual arena anymore.”
[...]
Because he is retiring at the end of this year, Guthrie said he felt the need to seize his opportunity to work with students and decided to continue his work creating collaborative nude photographs.
“I want (viewers) to be compelled by the image and to care if they can get past any initial shock value,” he said.
The school has determined there’s a protocol in place so students do not feel pressured to participate, Heather Swain, interim vice president for university relations, said in a statement. She said Guthrie does not recruit students currently enrolled in his classes to model for photographs.
Here’s what The State News reported of how Guthrie acquires models:
To create his art, Guthrie said he approaches students he feels would be open to the project. He then emails images he would like to recreate for the student to view, and the student describes what poses he or she is comfortable with.
Reactions to Guthrie’s photography differ. Guthrie recalled one students’ anonymous comment declaring he or she would not enroll in a photography class for fear of having Guthrie as a professor. He said he isn’t surprised by the negative feedback but sometimes is hurt by the harsh level of the comments.
“I want people to think, but I don’t want them to get angry,” he said. “I don’t want to make my students uncomfortable.”
“Sometimes art, and the means by which it is expressed, evokes strong responses — both for and against it. In situations where the art relates to an academic activity, MSU’s main concern is to maintain the integrity of the teaching and learning environment,” Swain’s statement said.
Laura Merrihew of the southern Michigan community of Brooklyn has a daughter who attends Michigan State. She has been lobbying university officials to stop Guthrie‘s photos after a relative showed her a column written by a student challenging Guthrie’s work.
“This man has breached the bounds of the student-professor relationship,” Merrihew said. “His pictures are sexually motivated and they are taking advantage of the students. There are several with totally nude girls that he’s holding and touching.
“To think that he is participating in this and not thinking: ‘What good luck I have to be able to do this and get away with this.’”
Others, however, have defended Guthrie’s photographs. Henry Brimmer, an assistant professor in Michigan State’s Department of Advertising, Public Relations and Retailing, said those raising questions don’t understand that Guthrie is a serious artist.
“His work is gorgeous, it is beautiful, it is well done, it has significance,” Brimmer said.
Those who choose to participate are volunteers, Swain said, and they determine the extent of their participation and approve the final photographs. She noted in an email Wednesday that the university has not received complaints from participants.
“While we understand the shock value of Professor Guthrie’s art, it is not sexual harassment and does not violate university policies. Whether students, as adults, choose to model for him is not something the university can or should control,” she said.
Michael Hersrud, a former Michigan State assistant professor in graphic design, said he chose to pose with a female faculty member. Now an assistant professor for Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar, he said via email that Guthrie’s work challenges perceptions of art and media.
“A painting of a nude figure prior to photography was not always viewed as ”art,” but over time we have come to accept this nude painting as a work of art,” Hersrud said.
You can view more of Guthrie’s images on his MSU portfolio.























Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (420)
AmeriCat
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:11pmGross. Dirty Old Man……even when he was young.
Report Post »WhatReally
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:01pmDefinitely, Yuck! It feels like sanctioned pedophilia. If he is excited to show this level of “work”, it makes me wonder what he has kept hidden. Sad
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:32pmAre we creating a pedophile loop hole?? It will be okay, as long as pictures are taken, and those pictures are taken in an artistic manner….who will deem the pictures artistic??
Report Post »GREENDOG
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:34pmMaybe he can hook up with Jerry Sandusky. He looks like he would like that!
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:44pmNOW I understand! Jerry Sandusky was just creating ART like this sick genius. Too bad Sandusky‘s ’Students‘ were so old fashioned they didn’t appreciate the art they were creating.
Next we’ll be told we need to accept pedophilia as a free expression of “shock-value artistic expression” and free speech.
Report Post »Founding Father2
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:47pmTHIS GUY PROBABLY SENDS THRILLS UP MSNBC‘S CHRIS MATTHEWS’ LEG…
Did you see that Matthews is now setting the record straight on that thrill: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/nov/matthews_tingle_leg.html
Report Post »quicker
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 8:08pmThis guy is a pervert ,That only applies if you are not a liberal .A liberal it`s only art.I call BS on this crap and if this was my daughter I Would pratice my old farm hand skill of gelding.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 8:30pmBeyond gross.
Report Post »junkmaninohio
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 9:04pmThis guy is a predator.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 9:12pmIs that Ben Bernanke? Sure looks like a slightly older version Ben Bernanke. He’s cuddling with himself, the men, women and children in the photos just like Ben fondles with our money in a deviant manner. Just sick. Gives a new meaning to QE1, QE2 and the upcoming QE3…
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 9:23pmNo, I got it. That‘s Ben Bernanke’s Father. Like Father like Son. Stay away from our Children, our Money and our Government. Stop perverting the US monetary system. I look forward to seeing you on MSNBC’s Perverted Justice Mr. Bernanke or MSNBC’s life behind bars program. This is just sick and another example of what is taught in the progressive, socialist, Marxist Universities today. No wonder the 20 something’s have no idea about what is right and wrong.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 11:07pmThis may or may not be Art. What bothers me is that this is being doing at a public university; on the taxpayer dime.
Report Post »If this man truly believes this is Art then; either the work should stand on it’s own merits or he should secure private money patronage.
TexasKnight
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 11:22pmYuck, but he is not a pedophile. These were college students, not middle and elementary students like Sandusky.
Report Post »While I am opposed to him using tax dollars (state supported university) for this ‘art’, He is not a pedophile.
freeus
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 11:23pmLaw enforcement should look into this situation. Art? Con art.
Report Post »InversionTheory
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 11:36pmMy god…Will you people stop calling this pedophilia! Pedophilia is sexual interest in pre-pubescent children. Every single one of the people in those photos has gone through puberty and has reached the age of consent. I’d classify this as lousy erotica, not even pornography… He’s trying to portray sexuality with artist aspirations (even if he’s awful at it). If this arouses your disgust, perhaps there are some Renaissance masterpieces you’d like to see done away with… Some of those depicting Hell are FAR more graphic (and vastly superior as works of art) and there are depictions of naked children on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in the Deluge panel. Is that pedophiliac pornography? Shall we paint over it? Something….off-white perhaps?
Report Post »ghostsouls
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:00amJust like a democrat using the arts as a cover for lewd and lascivious conduct.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:37am@InversionTheory
Report Post »“My god…Will you people stop calling this pedophilia’
——————————————————————————-
I don’t call it pedophilia. I call it, “How to obtain AIDS 101, college style, from your promiscuous, old, has been, wants to stick his thing into anything he can, dirty old man, wants communism, socialist and Marxist to reign supreme, can’t get a job anywhere’s else as the Black Lady has her hand over her mouth as she giggles over the stupidity of this sexually repulsive stupid white man.
Kind of reminds me of Michele Obama sizing up Barney Franks.
Ded-Bred
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:46amAs an artist, poet & songwriter, I understand what the professor is attempting to accomplish. However, his own words convict him:
Report Post »“I want people to think, but I don’t want them to get angry,” he said. “I don’t want to make my students uncomfortable”, he says. But how can he expect this to be inoffensive to all. And refrain from causing discomfort to everyone? Sorry, I’m not buying that. More likely he is selfish & unconcerned about others’ feelings.
“Sometimes art, and the means by which it is expressed, evokes strong responses — both for and against it. In situations where the art relates to an academic activity, MSU’s main concern is to maintain the integrity of the teaching and learning environment,” Swain’s statement said.
The school’s stance is even more bogus: Integrity is not in any of this. Every parent allowing their children to attend this school much less pay for their “education” at this university should withdraw immediately.
lodgerat
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:11amJust another example of a leftist college professor promoting the moral decline in society and trying to make it something else. Crap is crap no matter what you call it. Gee I wonder how much students paid to attend his class. If it was more than a dollar they got ripped off. Sick puppy
Report Post »jollylama
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:17amThe parents of these students must be so proud.
Report Post »Suzee
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:55amThe decline of our civilization has accelerated. Once the closet door opened the stench has permeated every corner of what once was a moral & decent habitat.
Report Post »Jomil48
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:04amAll this guy is teaching is lascivious behavior, what a pervert.
Report Post »thestickman
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:00amThe other day it was men kissing. What in the world is up with the Blaze posting all this filth?
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:25amSchools… this is where the Pedophiles go legally to gain access to the children…
Can you spell pervert?
Report Post »Oil_Robb
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 8:05amtypical leftist sodomite
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 8:31amYou can do nudes without being overtly sexual. I wondered about the one in the background of him carrying a woman, that’s ALMOST art, but the others are too sexual. The hugging the guy is very homosexual, and you notice he’s pulling away from the black woman. The body language speaks volumes. If you compare the two side by side, it’s like he prefers white men to black women. I was an art major in college, and I wouldn’t call most of that art.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 9:04amProof that the envelope has not only been broken, its been dissolved.
Report Post »Wake up America, we’re being eaten alive by predators
PubliusPencilman
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 9:26amIt’s not pedophilia if the participants are over 18.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:05amAll I can tell you is that it’s GREAT we have parents in this country that will send their kids to the place where clowns like this work so they can be molested. Of course, there is a ‘fee’ (tuition/fees). Keeps them from the general population.
Report Post »Itchee Dryback
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:32amThat guy could be from ‘central casting’….he just oozes effete, metrosexual, Peter Pan professor who simply refuses to grow out of the 60′s mind set.
Report Post »Liberalism is a mental disorder.
bhohater
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:37amYou got that right. What a country, where do we go from here?
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:39amThis is the breakdown they’ve always been working towards…from the feminists to those at Playboy. The goal? To get our wholesome looking women to take off their clothes at the drop of a hat for sex and for exploitation…guess what? It worked! Women see nothing wrong with porn these days and everyone wants in to make a buck, thats prostituting ones self make no mistake about it.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:50amForgive me I’am just a dumb redneck but I know the art trap. Call it art and its OK . No its not. We are coming for you.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:56amI guarantee you this guy has an I Q of around 130. He has that dumb idea he is smarter than others and that stupid look on his face, he looks like a dixie chick all stoic. Damn hes easy to read. We ain’t buying what he is selling. If he had a real life and wife she would straighten his asz out. Hes so cool. Like Hell.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:57am1) Is this guy married?
Report Post »2) He is wearing a marijuana shirt – nice touch for the students
3) I always use art as a pretense – Hey Honey want to be in a movie – I am the director.
KOCHLEFFEL
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 10:58amAll your commends are stupid! As for pedophilia, you paying for it with your taxes
Report Post »to keep Afghanistan going where pedophilia is practiced.
Jezcruzen
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:17amIf it had been my daughter that he posed with, and I found out about it, he wouldn’t be able to pose any longer.
Report Post »ScienceIsNotEvil
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:33amBallot_Box_Revolution
Pedophile means you are attracted to kids before sexual maturity. Not sure if 18+ year old women meet that definition.
Report Post »jblaze
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:36amHe’s just a dirty old man! Sicko!
Report Post »drphil69
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:58am….but some are more equal than others…
Pedophiles are now sifted out of the Catholic church… so now they become college professors.
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:04pmSince in art appreciation we learn that it is the viewers, not the artist who determine what is art, we can therefore define this as NOT being aorks of art. “Artists” forget that and try then to say instead that they are simply excercising their freedom of speech. I would not call this nor flag burning freedom of speech. What message is relayed here? People actually pay tuitio to go to this college so they can participate in ancient Greece stylized “artwork” and “freedom of expression”. Speech is vocal… sign language is expression… expression is more inclusive. Seeing this sick twisted old man living by the inferred Def Leppard “I’ve got something to say, it’s better to burn out than fade away” mentality is vomitous.
Report Post »Roberto G. Vasquez
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:05pmIf the students are adults and volunteer, what’s the big deal?
Report Post »SouthSideLib
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:29pmThese are college students, not children. It is in no way pedophilia.
Report Post »RJO
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:34pmDirty Old Man? You’re too kind. Dirt Bag who makes big bucks off of the backs of Michigan taxpayers…are there any left?
Dung on a Crucifix of Christ….this “art” that is defended by the “enlightened” and the social “elite.” This activity and many other forms of it was going on – full tilt before the birth of Jesus and has re-appeared again. Nothing new here.
Report Post »RJO
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 12:37pmDirty Old Man? You’re too kind. Dirt Bag who makes big bucks off of the backs of Michigan taxpayers…are there any left?
Whether it be dung on a Crucifix of Christ…. “art” that is defended by the “enlightened” and the social “elite” or the latest boat-load of garbage from tax-funded Michigan State University. This activity and many other forms of it was going on – full tilt before the birth of Jesus and has re-appeared again. Nothing new here.
Report Post »Itchee Dryback
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:00pmScienceIsNotEvil
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:33am
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Pedophile means you are attracted to kids before sexual maturity. Not sure if 18+ year old women meet that definition.
_________________________________________________
The maturity level has fallen in the last 30 yrs.
Report Post »There is a good chance that a 18 yr old today has the maturity level of a preteen 100 yrs ago.
Itchee Dryback
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:11pmdrphil69
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:58am
….but some are more equal than others…
Pedophiles are now sifted out of the Catholic church… so now they become college professors.
___________________________________________
Actually…no.
Report Post »They have always been in education. As a famous bank robber said when asked why he robs banks…“Because that where the money is”.
And schools are where the kids are.
For every 1 Catholic priest that is accused sexual assault, there are around 40 teachers accused.
gravelgoose
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:16pmbet him an weiner was class mates, or weiner was one of his students
Report Post »cosette
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:54pmIn 1996 Robert Bork wrote a book- Slouching towards Gomorrah. I do believe we have arrived.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 2:16pmYea… Michigan: More Money for Teachers & Education!
Report Post »Itchee Dryback
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:08pmStoic one
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 11:07pm
This may or may not be Art.
___________________________________________
Its not art. Artists tend to not be a part of the art. If it was supposedly some kind of “statement” about age and its *angst* or some such tripe, why does the “artist” have to be in the photographs?..why all the touchy physical contact?
Report Post »The guys not right in the head.
Polwatcher
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:18pmI wonder if he is related to Anthony Weiner.
Report Post »joseph mitch nixon
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:12pmthe stupid dirty freak believe he is an ARTIST , he is not , just dirty tasteless staff . i do hate it .
Report Post »Highland
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 8:55pmAnyone but an “academic” would be fired a.s.a.p.
Report Post »motonutt
Posted on November 25, 2011 at 8:57amPLEASE BLAZE….Remove this story, every time I have to scroll by this freak it makes me sick!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on November 25, 2011 at 11:55amTypical old perv professor hiding behind “art” to get his jollies from students. And Gutrhie admits the photos are sexually charged while he tries to justify his thinly veiled lasciviousness by offering that the photos are his lamenting the loss of his virility as he ages? The man is an insult to the term “higher education”. He’s an old lech getting vicarious thrills from younger, dumber students who bought his subterfuge. And quite honestly…they’re not even good photos. He looks like an idiot.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on November 25, 2011 at 11:56amThe only thing this idiot Guthrie is challenging are the bounds of credibility.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on November 25, 2011 at 3:28pmwere these students 18?
Report Post »most likely….
I honestly don’t see the problem here.
Granted, he is “ copying” works that inspired him.
I am thankful he doesn’t look like Michael Moore.
…and lets remember Sandusky from Penn State..makes this look like Baby Einstein!
SLOWBIDEN
Posted on November 26, 2011 at 2:36pmThis guy obviously has some serious issues
Report Post »pandora
Posted on December 17, 2011 at 1:10amThis isn’t pedophilia. They are all over 18 and consenting adults. If they were minors, I’d throw him in jail. I don’t really like this type of photography. I am a professional photographer and I am ok with boudoir pictures, which has become very trendy, but this just doesn’t say anything to me. It doesn‘t seem like there’s an obvious statement or reason. Maybe that’s just me and others see something totally different, but I don’t care for it that much. I guess maybe the guy is retiring soon so he finally took his shot at seeing students naked. LOL
Report Post »blazingaway
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:11pmTHE PROFESSOR has a GOD complex …. thinks he’s some sort of messiah … just another sick intellectual jackass who needs to be committed
Report Post »quicker
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 8:13pmHe needs gelding
Report Post »iwalkalone
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 10:03pmThe last thing he needs is a gelding. beastiallity wont improve his teaching.
Report Post »What happened to the teacher student relationship prohibition. Out of all the things banned on campus they missed that one? Bohemians are always around but there are rules for professors and student relationships that are above and beyond mere morals(not misspelled). Why must he use students anyway? Arent there other more appropriate models available at his gay night club,strip bar, or day care, as the case may be.
chris.duncan
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 6:43amiwalkalone
if you have to point out (and do without first being prompted to do so) that what you‘re saying isn’t misspelled there‘s usually a good chance you’re only putting it in there to sound smarter than you really are.
stop trying to impress us, it’s a web forum, not a national debate
and just to stay on topic, all you people accusing this guy of pedophilia need to get lives, the people in his picture are fully grown (and clothed for the most part) adults who aren’t even really in sexual/provocative poses, i would barely even call this perverted, although it is creepy and unacceptable, generally if you want to make “art” it’s best not to use your students…. he must have missed the memo
Report Post »iwalkalone
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 7:39amchrisduncan
you sir are an idiot.
Report Post »Try minding your own business nitwit. In a battle of wits you are clearly unarmed.
I will let you know when I want the opinion of an idiot, you are the first one I will call.
Secessionista
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:03pmWait a second – there’s still people left in Michigan? Shouldn’t we organize some type of rescue operation or something?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:06pmLast one out … turn out the lights!
TEA!
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:12pmLol!
Report Post »AnAppealToGod
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:12pmTake a dump on a plate and call it art. That’s exactly what this is and so is most of “fine art”.
Report Post »Forced_Union_Worker
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:15pmThe only ones left are retires like me, and people on state aid
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:20pmI escaped years ago .. the first Granholm term was enough for me!
TEA!
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:17pmI heard Detroit is doing so bad that Haiti is throwing them a benefit concert.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 8:00pmDetroit can’t wait for this years first Blizzard, it will cause millions of dollars in improvements!
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on November 25, 2011 at 3:33pmI don’t think we should rescue them,
Report Post »look at the dude from the Detroit Lions, I hear they are un-sportsman like.
Which explains carl levin……………….
konakolina
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:03pmYet another liberal nut job on our college campuses. And we wonder why the kids are so screwed up? It’s pretty evident when you see who is teaching them.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:03pmIf He was just Joe Blow and had to pay models I would say it is his idea of art. I am surprised he has not gotten a $10000 grant or something from the Government. Then he could afford bull whips to insert in student’s orifices.
Report Post »p00gles
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:02pmUltra creepy pics.
Report Post »Secessionista
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:02pmMaybe he could do some pics with him and 10 year olds in a shower over at penn state? I am sure they would love such wonderful mastery of art there.
Report Post »last frontier
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:01pm“A painting of a nude figure prior to photography was not always viewed as ”art,” but over time we have come to accept this nude painting as a work of art,” Hersrud said
People in Germany got use to the treatment of the Jews as well, it‘s called Desensitizing and it’s not a healthy thing for society whats next professor and pony.
Report Post »barbaraw62
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 9:16pmI believe you “hit the nail on the head.”
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:00pm“Because he is retiring at the end of this year, Guthrie said he felt the need to seize his opportunity to work with students and decided to continue his work creating collaborative nude photographs.”
Old fart excuse to cop a few cheap feels with the youngsters in the name of art/photography. Guys like him put ads in papers all the time looking for similiar “subjects” for their own personal pleasure. Only difference with this guy… he‘s getting paid by MSU and it’s rationalized as “challenging and artistic.” Lol.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 8:45amThis is one of those cutting edge perverts.
Report Post »Secessionista
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:00pmShouldn’t he be at Zucotti park?
Report Post »usmc1063
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:57pmJust another dirty ole man trying to get his jollies.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:06pmHOLY H .. what has happened to old Moo U.
Would not have “flown” in the 1970′s .
Looks like porn to me.
Report Post »mattmo79
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:55pmJust another pervert working at a major U!!
Report Post »MommyNeedsMoreCoffee
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:54pmCan someone please explain the headline to me?
“MSU PROFESSOR‘S PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN NUDE STUDENTS HAVE ’SHOCK VALUE’”
Were the nude students taken? Were the photographs taken? Do the nude students have shock value? Is it missing the word “with”?
Report Post »nappy
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:59pmNO Kidding! Are we getting our headlines written in Russia now?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:07pmNo .. had to read the article to figure it out!
TEA!
Report Post »Tim Law
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:17amNope! China. cheaper labor.
Report Post »Mapache
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:54pmIf his art is so good, he can get non-student models to pose for him.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:51pmThat’s just creepy.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:57pmBig time creepy. I knew I shouldn’t have clicked this story. Does anyone know how to get vommit out of a keyboard?
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:08pmShopVac and Lysol……………
Report Post »goobert
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:49pmPorn is what I call it.
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:45pmAbsolutely….something is not right with this fellow!!!!
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 10:31pmI’ve worked in porn, & that‘s what I’d call it. This kinda stuff would be in the fetish section next to the Mr. Jeremy stuff. Nasty.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:44pmThings that make you go “hmmm…”
Report Post »orionreplay6607
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 5:08amThe thing is… we aren’t privy to the really good ones. They are described as being full nudity with the professor‘s head and hands touching students’ parts. Now me, as an art major with a graphic design degree 20+ years ago, this still strikes me as strange with a tinge of sad rolled in.
Clearly the students are of college age, they may even be of graduate school age. They are doing what they are doing of their own free will. Call it “art” if he wishes, but you know in the back of his mind he was hoping that this was a “turn on” to some degree for the students and it might just grow into something else… you know, in his last year in teaching.
People create art because of an emotional response to something happening in their lives. Sometimes they create art to produce an emotional response in the viewer. Sometimes they create art to have sex with the model(s).
Report Post »Thevoice
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:43pmAnother worthless Paper drgree pervert …
Report Post »AmericablessGod
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:42pmIs that John Corzine?
Report Post »Bekrhed
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:03pmWell of course you’re a bunch of Philistines.
Why does this not surprise me?
You’ve probably never set foot inside an Art Museum (or gallery).
Hahaha
Pathetic
Go back to the ‘boob-tube’ …it wants to sell you something.
Walkabout
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:12pmBekrhed
The Getty, the Louvre, the British art Museum & a few others. My, oh my, do you assume so much.
Report Post »conservativeamericanmom
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:40pmUm…yuck! How convenient for a dirty old man to be labeled as a professor!
Report Post »chips1
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:38pmOr a politician
Report Post »ZAP
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:39pmAnother pervert hiding in the art department.Must be a Democrat or Liber
Report Post »GODBLESSOURCOUNTRY
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:38pmArt schmart…
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:38pmOne more thing…the son leaves father photo…I have a son and he has his father…and they do not bond like this at all!
Report Post »PurrrpleMtnMajesty
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:53pmAbsolutely. Who LEAVES their parents home naked?
Report Post »Plus “Son leaves Father” looks more like, “Who farted?”
The prof pervert looks like he is ruminating while the boy is trying to not gag.
A Conservatarian
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:36pmActually they aren’t bad at all… as in the quality. There are hundreds if not thousands of other professors nationwide in Philosophy, Science, Mathematics and more that are nothing but a bunch of positivist leaning progressive tool bags that don’t even understand they are destroying young minds. This professor’s work is compelling, not the other way around.
Report Post »Komponist-ZAH
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:50pmWell…I don’t know about “compelling”, but I agree—not all that bad. Certainly there are worse pictures he could have taken….
Report Post »Steverino
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 6:10pmSpeaking as somebody that doesn’t really have a “horse in the race”, they strike me as being trite and nonchalant while being overwrought. That may not be very clear, but I can only compare them to someone “overacting” in a really poorly written movie.
Report Post »William Shatner would probably love them.
Bonus points for being in focus, however.
Steve
Walkabout
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:14pmIrrespective of the technical aspect or lack thereof, why does he have to be in all the pictures?
Is he mixing work & play?
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 2:47amLike I said … compelling. Does that mean the knowledge the pictures stir up will all be positive about this man? Nope. Why is he in every shot? Perhaps he‘s the type of director that likes to be in every scene which wouldn’t make for that good of a movie. Then again, watch the movie Aunt Mame, if the lead actress Rosalind Russel, that was in every scene, had been the director as well whew, what an amazing woman! Art has declined significantly since then, both in moving and still pictures – compelling yet again. Perhaps our professor is just self-centered with some delusions of grandeur; perhaps regret of a misplaced career all culminating in a spree before his retirement (he alludes to as much) – motivation for the creation of a piece of work, compelling again. What I do know is this isn’t perverted work. I can see some ready to press the censorship button, tisk tisk. Some of these shots are fairly artistic and made me think of other paintings and the idea to mimic those paintings in still shot is actually a pretty good idea, though I’m not sure if he came up with the idea. It makes me want to know more about where the idea came from. If all you see is perversion, well, the thoughts reside in your mind too, why do you think perversion right off the bat? Take a chill pill, you do not have to look at the works, you were not forced to click this link to the story.
Report Post »Disclaimer: The “You” in the foregoing post is to the ubiquitous 2nd person, none particular.
paperpushermj
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 1:29pmConservatarian
Report Post »You make valid points on the few examples given of his work. I do find his being the focus of the work Unsettling though. With each picture my eye is drawn to him first then to the rest of the content which I do not think from the grading of Good Art and Above should Do. He works should be called “Ode to Self”
godlovinmom
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:36pmOne word…PERVERT!
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 7:47pmAmen!!!
Report Post »ScienceIsNotEvil
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 11:35amAt least he isn’t using his position of authority over his charges to get them pregnant.
Report Post »